NYC: Two accused of hate attack on imam deny all bias charges

It's the defendants' word against the plaintiff's and that of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). They say they were in a scuffle with the imam after one of them bumped into him and he scornfully refused to shake his hand. He says they shouted slurs against Muslims and attacked him gratuitously.

Of course, if they really did that, they'd have every reason to deny it and fabricate an alternative story. But surely the imam wouldn't have any reason to fabricate his charges against them, and make up a bias attack against himself, would he? Well, actually, there is abundant precedent. Hamas-linked CAIR and other Muslims have not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating "hate crimes," including attacks on mosques. CAIR and other groups like it want and need hate crimes against Muslims, because they can use them for political points and as weapons to intimidate people into remaining silent about the jihad threat.

So what happened here is anybody's guess. But both sides, not just the defendants, have ample enticement to lead them to make up their stories.

"2 accused of NY subway station hate attack on imam," from Associated Press, December 9 (thanks to JCB):

NEW YORK - Two men attacked a Muslim religious leader in a hate-fueled assault in a subway station, with one hurling slurs along with a fist, prosecutors and Muslim advocates said Thursday.

But defense lawyers said the incident was a fight spurred by an accidental bump, not bias.

Eddie Crespo, an officer with a transportation police force, and friend Albert Melendez were charged Thursday with robbery and assault, both as hate crimes.

The allegations rapidly sounded alarms from Muslim advocates, who added the incident to what they say is a spike in anti-Muslim violence this year. But lawyers for the men said authorities had miscast a straightforward dispute as a hate crime.

"This was certainly not a racially motivated attack. Judge, these are trumped-up charges," Melendez's lawyer, Angel Soto, said at his client's arraignment.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations said the victim was an imam but declined to identify him.

AP gives no hint, of course, of the fact that CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several of its former officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. Two of its other officials have made Islamic supremacist statements. CAIR also was involved in the Flying Imams' intimidation suit against the passengers who reported their suspicious behavior.

Melendez and Crespo -- the boyfriend [of] Melendez's sister, according to Crespo's lawyer -- crossed paths with the imam on a subway train early Wednesday, according to a court complaint.

According to the court complaint, Melendez, 30, declared "I don't like Muslims," and used an insulting term for Muslims or Arabs, before trying to kick the imam and grabbing him as he got off the train at a lower Manhattan station. CAIR said one of the attackers also smeared all Muslims as terrorists.

Amid a scuffle, Crespo, 28, grabbed the imam to help Melendez, according to the court complaint. Ultimately, Melendez punched the imam in the face and threw his kufi -- a prayer cap -- onto the subway tracks, the complaint said.

"The imam's prayer cap being thrown on the subway tracks, coupled with the religious and racial slurs, indicates that the motivation behind the violent attack was hatred towards the entire Muslim community," said Aliya Latif, the civil rights director for CAIR's New York chapter.

Defense lawyers said the fight began after Melendez and the imam bumped into each other and the imam scornfully refused to shake his hand.

Crespo tried to break up the scuffle and tend to the injured man afterward, said Crespo's lawyer, Arnold Keith. He said Crespo didn't even see the man's cap.

"This is a nightmare for him," Keith said in an interview.

Crespo, a Metropolitan Transportation Authority bridge and tunnel officer for five years, has been suspended without pay, the agency said....

CAIR hasn't compiled an exact tally of anti-Muslim incidents nationwide this year, "but anecdotally, we've seen a real uptick," particularly since debate flared this summer over plans for a mosque and Islamic center two blocks from ground zero, said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the group's national office....

Could it be that Honest Ibe Hooper doesn't have an exact tally because the figures show that hate crimes against Muslims are actually rare?

| 37 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

37 Comments

| Leave a comment

I find it very suspicious that mosques are supposedly bombed or vandalized by 'infidels'! And then followed up by the usual VICTIMIZATION propaganda lies that "Islamophobia" is the cause of it! The Police must investigate throughly to ensure that such perpetrators are who are caught are really the 'infidels' - so as not to let Muslim fanatics and terrorists to win by stealth jihad strategy! After all, look at regular occurence - Muslims have been killing each other and bombing mosques like in Afghanistan and Pakistan what more to stop them from bombing mosque in the West to force the West to kneel down further like slaves to their goal. Including to stop our 'infidel' freedom of speech, in the Arabic-Islamic evil goal of colonizing the West/Judeo-Christian civilization!

OT

Police in Kohat avert ‘massive’ attack
http://www.dawn.com/2010/12/11/police-in-kohat-avert-%e2%80%98massive%e2%80%99-attack.html

PESHAWAR: Police in northwestern Pakistan’s Kohat city on Saturday seized a vehicle carrying a tonne of explosives, averting an attack that they said could have caused massive destruction.

Dilawar Bangash, a local police chief, told AFP that the attackers intended to use the explosives to target religious processions in Kohat.

OT

Hardline clerics launch hate campaign against Mughalpura Ahmedis
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\12\11\story_11-12-2010_pg13_9

LAHORE: A number of hardliner clerics from various sects have launched a wide-scale joint hate campaign against Ahmedis, and especially those living in Mughalpura are being targeted.

The campaign is mainly launched by local clerics from Shah Kamal Mosque in Ganj Bazaar Area of Mughalpura in collaboration with hardliners from the Deoband, Barelvi and other sects. They are targeting the local Ahmedis by provoking the youth and other people not only to boycott the community but are also urging them to kill Ahmedis in the name of religion.

I'm not going to comment on New York subway "etiquette", however defence of the free world in the face of izlamic jihad is NOT a hate crime.

"Could it be that Honest Ibe Hooper doesn't have an exact tally because the figures show that hate crimes against Muslims are actually rate?"

Yes, it could be that, and most likely is. CAIR is desperate to hang the label of "anti-Muslim" hate crime on any minor incident involving unpleasant contact between Muslims and infidels in order to deflect attention away from far more numerous incidents of real hate crimes directed by Muslims against infidels.

"CAIR and other groups like it want and need hate crimes against Muslims..."

Nice allusion to Jack Nicholson's phrase in his famous speech on the stand in "A Few Good Men." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hopNAI8Pefg

Col. Jessup (Nicholson) voiced some harsh truths in that speech, truths the Liberal Left tend to sneer and laugh at. Unfortunately for him, the man-boy hero of the movie (Tom Cruise), representing Hollywood's political correctness, won the case and Nicholson is led away under guard immediately following this speech. It is ironic, and probably a little unnerving to Liberals, that the speech itself is about the only thing that is notable about this movie.

Two men attacked a Muslim religious leader in a hate-fueled assault in a subway station, with one hurling slurs along with a fist, prosecutors and Muslim advocates said Thursday...


Sorry, but shouldn't that say allegedly attacked? Or, are we to presume that any incident involving a muslim means the infidel is guilty until proven innocent? Also, where are the witnesses to this case...somebody surely must have heard and seen this incident. I would much rather hear there side of the story since both parties are apt to, let's say, twist the truth a little to support their claims. Regardless of the intent, any incident involving a muslim and non-muslim will immediately be labelled a bias crime (against the muslim of course) because cair will not stand for anything less so they can keep record. I can only hope the truth prevails and the trial is not some PC shame that limits real facts. It's a shame that this article presents this case as some sort of foregone conclusion that the infidels are guilty of a biased crime and the imam did nothing wrong.

+++++ OT breaking +++++

Car bomb explosion among Christmas shoppers in Swedish capital of Stockholm +++ two blasts +++++ one dead, two injured

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/11/ap/world/main7140906.shtml

http://tundratabloids.com/ (with picture of blazing car)

of a lesser note ... just the touching of a scholar by an "infidel" is an offense ... something about greater and lesser in status ... something about contamination and defilement of a pure one by one not pure

stop SHARIA. this body of law gives a false impression about what is right and not, like keeping purity by demeaning others

OT

Malaysian Minister Refuses to Review Child Marriage Law http://www.medindia.net/news/Malaysian-Minister-Refuses-to-Review-Child-Marriage-Law-77852-1.htm#ixzz17qBHw5xG

Malaysian Muslims below the age of 16 are allowed to marry as long as they obtain the permission of the religious courts. Sharia law runs in parallel with civil law in the multi-ethnic country.

Nazri Aziz, a minister in the premier's department in charge of legal affairs, said the government has no plan to review laws allowing for underage marriages because the practice is permitted under Islam.

"If the religion allows it, then we can't legislate against it," he told a press conference.

Obviously Americans are still very racist and intolerant, so my advice is that for the time being, until the Americans evolve beyond their current cultural development stage, the borders should be closed to further immigration as the violently intolerant nature of the American culture makes the American environment too dangerous for the immigrants, particularly Muslim immigrants who are too peaceful and tolerant for the intolerant Americans too tolerate, being such a different culture.

But seriously, I'm afraid anti-Muslim crimes will indeed rise in the west in general. It's almost inevitable. In every poll I've seen so far from different western countries a majority of the population opposes mass immigration. In an American poll I've seen about a year ago also most minorities in the US opposed mass immigration. In other words, mass immigration is imposed on the people by the elites. And while many Muslims are peaceful law abiding citizens who wouldn't harm a fly, too many Muslims are seriously misbehaving. The mass immigration policy has become irrational and doesn't serve the interest of the country in any way. Unlike the Jews in the past and the Roma in the present, most of the immigrants have their own states. There is good reason to allow Roma immigration since, like the Jews in the past, they were expelled from their country and have been wandering throughout the world and were often persecuted and still are in some places. Muslims, however, have 50-60 Muslim majority states where too often non-Muslims are persecuted. In many western countries Muslims are over-represented in crime and welfare, not to mention lethal terrorist attacks. And while secular people of Muslim background, Muslim reformists and other such categories willingly integrate into the democratic liberal society, the Islamic religion as is professed by most Muslims today is incompatible with liberal democracy. Therefor there simply isn't any compelling reason for continued mass immigration.

But regardless of these facts, and regardless of the opposition to mass immigration by majorities in all western countries, mass immigration continues, and in most countries the people find themselves powerless to change this self-destructive policy through democratic means since any and all opposition is branded "racist", "Islamophobe", "far-right" and the like, and in some places laws have been legistlated to ban and criminalize the opposition as hate speech, all while many people who expressed such opposition or criticized Islam, whether politicians, authors or caricaturists, live under dead threats from radical Muslims, some have become actual prisoners to these threats, living in safe houses or secret addresses with 24/7 security and body guards, some even had to addopt new indentities to escape the deadly wrath.

This combination of a self-destructive policy the majority opposes and the powerlessness of the people to change it by democratic and legitimate means is bound at some point to lead people to take the law into their own hands.

Well I think the two men are guiely of than hate crime than they lawyer is covering up for them. Since the cop is suspence from the force they must think he is guiely too.

More on the two Stockholm-blasts (obviously one car and the pious Mohammedan himself):

Suicide Bomber had six pipebombs, backpack filled with nails and explosives:

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article8265883.ab

From the article: "Enligt vittnen på plats ska mannen ha ropat något på arabiska innan bomben detonerade" = Witnesses said the man sremed somthing in arabic when the bombs exploded.

Bet you it was Allah Akbar.

More on a threat ten Minutes before the blast (google translator):

http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.svd.se%2Fnyheter%2Finrikes%2Fman-sprangde-sig-sjalv-i-stockholm_5802915.svd

About ten minutes before the explosions sent an email to TT, also addressed to the Security Service, where a man turns to "Sweden and the Swedish people". He refers to the Swedish silence on Lars Vilks paintings, the Swedish soldiers in Afghanistan, saying that "now is your children, daughters and sisters die same as our brothers and sisters and children are dying."

– As long as you do not stop your war against Islam and degrading to the Prophet and your stupid support for the pig Vilks, "says the man.

He ends the message with yet another call for "all the mujahideen in Europe and Sweden":

– Come up with whatever you are although it is a knife and I know you have more than one knife to come by. Fear not, fear not a prison, do not fear death.

There is nothing in the audio files of the man who speaks belong to any organization. However, he said he had been in the Middle East and he would ask his family for forgiveness because he lied to them.

– I never went to the Middle East to work or earn money, I went there for jihad, "said the man.

SAPO has not wanted to comment on the content of TT or confirm if you received the email, which contains audio files where both Swedish and Arabic are spoken.

Defender, you idiot! Anyone in an official capacity is suspended (often with pay) pending investigation and adjudication of the case (look those words up, if you can).

Besides, this was clearly a case of Kuffar-hatred by the imam. Hate-crime charges should be filed against the imam for "scornfully" refusing the Kuffar's handshake. This was clerly an act of hatred and contempt for the entire American Community from an arrogant, bullying imam. CAIR should likewise be charged for contributing to the tense atmosphere with their hate-filled, anti-American rhetoric. No doubt the ACLU will get right on this!

How about it, defender, a hate-crime charge against the imam, eh? What's good for the goose...

And, isn't there some law about imams not being allowed on subways anyway? Oh, there isn't? Well, I'd surely vote for it!

Impeachment is a permitted technique used principally by attorneys, usually on cross examination, to test the veracity or believability of a witness.

Taqiyya, Islamicly-authorized lying, is an accepted part of Islam. In cases where one party is alleging, as here, bias on the part of his attackers, Islam becomes directly involved, meaning the judge "should" allow the attackers to bring into evidence the existence of the practice of taqiyya as it bears directly on the worthiness of this imam's testimony.

It will then be left to the fact finder, judge or jury, as to which witnesses to believe.

When a Muslim says "yes" or "no" the testimony cannot be taken at face value.

Sorry, in second paragraph, should be, "This was clearly..." (not "clerly")

But perhaps the defender will better understand it in the original form...

Confirmed: Swedens first suicide bomber.

Here are three videos (scroll down a bit):

http://www.pi-news.net/2010/12/selbstmordanschlag-in-stockholm/

I read about this story a couple of days ago. Seems the retelling of events have been filtered through CAIR to trump up charges and the msm is running with it. Can’t have FBI stats about non-existent hate crimes against muslims continue. Trump up the charges.

Published reports do not mention any other witnesses to the altercation. Given this event took place during the ungodly hours of a midweek morning (Wed. 3:25 am), it’s highly unlikely this imam encountered a crowd in this subway car.

"The clash between Melendez and [imam] Peterson was sparked by a “bump” on the subway – not bigotry, said Melendez’s lawyer, Angel Soto. He said Crespo, who is engaged to Melendez’s sister, tried to break up the fight, never saw the kufi and stuck around to help the imam."

Sounds to me as if this kufi wearing imam was less than cordial or recklessly clumsy with fellow passengers on the northbound A-train platform at 3:25 a.m. Wednesday. This 'imams' rap sheet (see below) indicates his credibility should be questioned. For instance, he claims he was mugged. Mugged? For what . . .his kufi? Poppycock. At that ungodly hour, was this 'imam' heading out in preparation for first morning call to prayer or was he stressing for an excuse to convince his baby-mama [see note below, he's daddy to several children] of plausible delay [headlined hate crime fiction] instead of fessing up to straying to the latest booty call beyond curfew?

Note: Rod Peterson, an imam from Queens is a married father of several children. He has a rap sheet that includes arrests for burglary, robbery and criminal possession of a weapon.

Lan Astaslem

Nothing like blowing up infidels during X-mas shopping (the Stockholm-site where the Mohammedan exploded himself - obviously too early):

http://gfx.aftonbladet-cdn.se/multimedia/dynamic/01349/Bild_7_1349726t.jpg

Suicide bomber in central Stockholm http://www.stockholmnews.com/more.aspx?NID=6412

(Updated 3) A car exploded at the busy shopping street Drottninggatan in central Stockholm. Then there was another explosion some distance away and one man died. According to news agency TT, a man had blown himself to death. He carried six interconnected pipe bombs but only one exploded. He also had a backpack full of nails, according to newspaper Aftonbladet.

According to witnesses, the man shouted something in Arabic before the bomb detonated.

In the film a man addresses to "Sweden and the Swedish people". He, among else, refers to the Swedish silence on artist Lars Vilks paintings of the muslim prophet Mohammed, the Swedish soldiers in Afghanistan, saying that "now shall your children, daughters and sisters die as our brothers and sisters and children are dying."

I think the '2 accused' in the headline or an 'alleged' robbery & assault both mean the same thing. However, the '2 accused' could be a veiled presumption of guilt designed to endear AP readers to the 'alleged' victim.

What I would really like to know is: Where do they come up with 'robbery' for tossing a 'kufi' on the subway tracks?

It seems to me the most they should be charged with is unlawfully disposing of hazardous waste.

CAIR should be charged with interfering in a criminal investigation. If this case ends up favoring the '2 accused' men, I hope they both sue this imam, CAIR & the city for violating their civil rights.

To Ibrahim 'the Muslim who cried WOLF!' Hooper:

'Anectdotally' implies information garnered by gossip. It is hearsay, unreliable, untrustworthy, & is based on faulty logic as is CAIR itself.


Meeeooooow... !

@sean, zulu

As we all know here, the genderized, socialized, feminized Swedes stuck in political correctness had it coming (as any other European country still has it) and it was just a matter of time: Year after year they swept the growing mohammedan problems under the carpet, pretended all was well and viciously attacked and silenced the Sverigedemokraterna for pointing at the elephant in the room.

Interesting days aead. I bet appeasement will sink to new lows as it gains even more momentum. Slowly the Stockholm news here in Germany reach the MSM. All comment sections turned off.

I have quite a few friends who live in Stockholm, so it will be interesting to hear their reaction to this event tomorrow.

Beating the daylight out of a brainwashed zombie of islam, or any constitutional saboteur , Nazi or KKK bastard is an act of love for America, the West and humanity. The quran is the all time mother of all hatred.
Kudos for these righteous New Yorkers for their patriotism hand shake or not.

Islam is at war with us

I'm at war with islam.

Terror bombing in Sweden - revenge over Lars Wilkes Mo cartoons:
http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=199005

He was suspend without pay which mean they believe him guiely of the crime. Pass criminal record cannot be use in case like this to attacker the accuer.So you broke the law Geogre again.

Eddie Crespo, an officer with a transportation police force, and friend Albert Melendez...

A police officer from New York? Maybe he lost buddies on 9/11/01? I think we really ought to take a sympathetic and understanding tack with this poor, misunderstood fellow...

It doesn't mean a thing, defender. If he's found not to have committed a crime, he'll get his back-pay. How's your low-life imam going to prove any of this without witnesses? And I haven't broken any laws at all, fool.

But, what about you, defender? Are you supporting a man with arrests for burglary, robbery and criminal possession of a weapon? Is this the kind of man you want for your imam? Or does your imam already have an arrest record like this nice man? Well?

"Pass criminal record cannot be use in case like this to attacker the accuer"

Oh yes it can. it is the defendant's past criminal record, if any, that cannot be considered during the trial prior to the verdict. It is only introduced during the sentencing phase following a guilty verdict.

In the U.S., when an individual is prosecuted by the state, all advantages as to the presumption of innocence, including prior criminal record, go to the defendant. The defendant may confront his accuser, and that confrontation can include introducing the accuser's past criminal record.

Your writings are really ignorant.

Keep spinning that litany of anecdotally anti-muslim incidents, Iblis Hooper. We can't tolerate debate flaring-up everywhere that Muslims merely practice their deen by spewing shapnel and flames, now, can we, Doug?

Keep spinning that litany of anecdotally anti-muslim incidents, Iblis Hooper. We can't tolerate debate flaring-up everywhere that Muslims merely practice their deen by spewing shrapnel and flames, now, can we, Doug?

This incident occured in a subway station, therefore, there must be CCTV footage. Why has that not been mentioned?

Judge can stop the use of pass criminal record in other cases it the record is old than the person reform. If than person was arrested for stoplifting at 20 year old and someone breat him up afew months later the accue cannot use the stoplifting arrest of the victum under any cirectiom. So what law school did you goto. In Michael Jackton trail the mother of the boy that accue him of crime try to do it in the past to get money from than store so the judge have to allow that to be brought up as it have than bearing on the case. It is you Islamoprobic Hater who want to bring it up to discredit than victum of than hate crime, I just ingore that type of remarked by hater like you. All of the tralking heads incudeing some far rightwing racist who hate black never watch the whole trail on CNN like I did. I would have voted not guiely as the State didnot prove they case. I wore leather gloves in the winter than they didnot get smaller when wet than then where dry.

Yes, we non-believers are wrong all of the time - and we are becoming proud of that! We know your game and and we know its game-time. You will lose!

I am so sick and tired of moslems being allowed to say and parade whatever hateful slogans they want to but once us Kuffars do so, we are slammed with race hate allegations.

Just think of the lurid, hateful posters moslims have held aloft, threatening death and violence to non-believers. Posters saying that islam will take over the world and their hate-fuelled fanatics saying that Buckingham Palace will fly the islamic flag from its turrets and, if our Queen Elizabeth wont convert to islam, she can leave the Country!!! Where are all the sanctions which could have been taken against these hate-mongers?

But any leftwing ideology is fawned over these days and it is the cowardly politicians way to fawn over moslems.

Actually, I resent being called a non-believer. I believe. I believe in the one true God who created the universe. To me, moslems are the non-believers.

TThe Islamic apologists are waiting for, hoping for, the eternally-hyped "backlash" against Muslims here in the West. My understanding of Islam is that --once the
Islamists can show there's some kind of de facto "war against Islam"-- then they can righteously demand that ALL Muslims in whatever country rise up to "defend Islam"
against the attacking Infidels.

Of course, the buttheads don't know how terrible (for them) such an uprising would be. They think our tolerance of their encroachments on our culture mean we're weak (and they probably think it's a sign that Allah is protecting them in their quest to spread Islam). They don't "get it" that it's the innate civility of the liberal West which is protecting them. When that "liberal Western civility" has been stretched to the breaking point, I would not want to be a Muslim anywhere in the West.

That leads to The Big Tragedy of this whole thing: our governments & elected "leaders" are abdicating their implicit responsibilities according to the "Social
Contract" theory and are thus dumping the responsibility for dealing with Islamic encroachment/ aggression onto their individual citizens. (Same sort of universal law
as with the deficit: whether or not government acknowledges the problem, the debt WILL BE PAID SOMEHOW.) Government and political leaders are NOT acknowledging there's a problem with Islam, they're NOT defending their citizens against the enemy they've allowed into our societies, they label it "hate speech" and (in many countries) are actually prosecuting citizens when they point out the costs to the West of importing
rabid anti-Westerners by the millions.

What happens when the "Social Contract" breaks down? What happens when citizens realize that their governments won't --or can't-- enforce rule-of-law when it comes to Muslim violence; when it becomes evident that only "native citizens" are expected to abide by cultural norms (ie, "act civilized") while the "restive Muslim immigrants" are not held to the same civilized standards?

Western society will come to a tipping point when our assumption of civility and goodwill and compromise-for-mutual-benefit is shattered. Let me quote from an essay by Bill Whittle (*see link below): "When a tipping point is reached [...] the system swings to a different stability mode [...] and Screw the Other Guy becomes the only rational choice." And if/when we make that cultural shift, to a point-of-view in which we no longer assume goodwill on the part of our fellow citizens, we don't think they'll "play fair", we think cooperation is for suckers, and that the only rational course of action is look-out-for-number-one and screw everybody else, then Western Civilization is dead.

THAT is what our policy-makers (throughout Europe, and here in the USA and Canada) are risking with their refusal to acknowledge and address the problems they've caused by
allowing huge numbers of Muslims to immigrate.

(*)
---see Bill Whittle's May 2007 essay on Game Theory -The Prisoner's Dilemma- as applied to cultures, at:
http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/2007/05/21/you-are-not-alone-part-1/

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter