Sikhs under attack in Pakistan: “It was a war situation, we were screaming to each other, ‘let’s go, run, now. We have to go’.”

This report notes that the Taliban have demanded an exorbitant payment of jizya, the punitive protection racket run against dhimmis — non-Muslims who have been subjugated under Islamic rule and are supposedly “protected” as long as they stay in line with respect to the whims of their overlords.

But this article refers to this practice as “the medieval tax levied on non-Muslims in an Islamic state.” While the demand for the jizya tax is “medieval” in the colloquial sense of being as backwards as it is severe, this description most importantly implies the jizya tax is an innovation, some relic of the past that came well after Muhammad and is out of step with his wishes for tolerance.

It is not. The jizya is demanded of unbelievers in Qur’an 9:29, which commands Muslims:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Allah never told them to stop. This is Islam’s “tolerance” of unbelievers. This demand has always been part of Islam since the moment the “revelation” of the verse was announced, and it always lies in wait to be implemented once again, as is now happening to the Sikhs in Pakistan.

“Pakistan: The Embattled Sikhs in Taliban Territory,” by Rania Abouzeid for Time, December 4:

In Peshawar’s noisy and manic Dabgari bazaar, bearded men weaving in and out of the curbside stores are a ubiquitous sight. (There are few women in the market). Most of them wear round, white Pashtun hats, a fixture in these parts. But there are a substantial number of merchants who, though also bearded and dressed in the traditional shalwar kameez, are adorned with the intricately wound and colorful turbans of those who profess the Sikh religion. Many of them live just a few streets away from the market, where the noise and rubbish-strewn streets fall away and are replaced by a warren of winding narrow alleyways, swept clean, and lined by brick homes, many of which despite being caked in decades of dust and disrepair still maintain a haughty grandeur. This is Jogan Shah, the Sikh neighborhood of Peshawar.

Sikhs and Hindus are tiny and embattled communities in Pakistan. As small, non-Muslim populations, especially in the volatile, religiously conservative northwest, they were easy prey for the Taliban. That’s why the population of Jogan Shah has spiked in recent years. Sikhs like Darsha Singh, displaced from his village of Orakzai in the war-ravaged tribal territories further northwest, have sought refuge with their co-religionists in Peshawar, which now hosts some 500 families, the largest Sikh population in Pakistan.

9:29 in action: Conversion, subjugation, or war:

In Darsha’s hometown, which was once Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud’s base, the insurgents demanded that the small indigenous Sikh community either convert to Islam, leave the land of their forebears or pay a 12 million rupee ($140,000) jizya – the medieval tax levied on non-Muslims in an Islamic state. The Taliban then provided incentive: forcibly occupying Sikh-owned shops and houses, demolishing almost a dozen homes and kidnapping several men, beheading two. The community banded together and managed to come up with about a quarter of the amount demanded by the Taliban.

Darsha and a handful of Orakzai’s 50 other Sikh families, escaped from their homes, fleeing a Sunni region to friendlier Shi’ite area. Although Orakzai is the only one of the seven federally administered tribal areas that doesn’t border Afghanistan, that didn’t shield it from the influence of the war across the border. The local Taliban quickly capitalized on the agency’s simmering, decades-old sectarian conflict between the majority Sunnis and the 10% of the population that are Shi’ites, widening the rift. The Sikhs knew who their friends were. “The Shi’ites let us into their community because Sikhs aren’t involved in terrorism,” Darsha says. “Our grandfathers lived here. They know us. We have lived together for generations.”

But they don’t live together anymore. Singh, along with all of Orakzai’s Sikh population, hastily fled just days after the military moved in to take on the militants last spring. “We left at 5 a.m.,” Darsha says, leaning forward away from the marble wall of the Sikh temple, his crossed legs sinking deeper into the ornate ruby red and deep navy patterned carpet adorning the wide, empty floor of the main hall. “It was a war situation, we were screaming to each other, ‘let’s go, run, now. we have to go’. We didn’t even bring any clothes with us.”

Now Darsha, who used to be a businessman, is unemployed and spends most of his day meeting friends near the temple, walking through the bazaar and “waiting for peace.” He hasn’t received any government assistance. The Gurdwara has provided displaced families with accommodation, three daily meals, and a one-off payment of 3,000 rupees, all funded through private donations, says Sahab Singh.

A few weeks ago, Darsha was buoyed by news that he had been waiting almost two years to hear. In late October Nadir Zeb, the inspector general of the paramilitary Frontier Corps, told a news conference that almost 90% of Orakzai had been cleared of Taliban, and that the 32,000 families that were forced to flee the agency could “return tomorrow.” Despite it being the second time in as many months that the security forces had announced that Orakzai had been pacified, Darsha and others Sikhs were reassured by the agency’s political representative that this time it really was safe enough to go home. So in early November some 26 vehicles, each car ferrying the menfolk of a particular Sikh family, headed out from Peshawar to Orakzai. It was so safe that the convoy only needed an armed Pakistani military escort of more than a dozen jeeps to secure its path.

But there was little to celebrate upon arriving in Orakzai. “There’s nothing left of my house,” Darsha says. “It’s destroyed and everything has been looted. I couldn’t retrieve anything and I don’t have enough money to start a new business.” It was the same story for the other Sikh families. “We wanted to stay but we had nothing to stay for,” says Ameer Singh, 30, a textiles merchant and the father of two. “Nothing is left of those eight rooms,” he says, referring to his home. “Nothing.”…

Pakistan: Misunderstanders of Islam murder 50 in twin jihad/martyrdom attacks
Pakistani government helped Mumbai jihad group evade UN sanctions
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    “nothing” is what Islam has to offer…”nothing” is what Islam will leave you and “nothing” is what Islam will allow you to have and to keep….and that includes your life…

  2. says

    Can somebody please explain what differentiates the Ummah from an Organised Crime ‘Family’?

    Because, frankly, I find it very hard to see any distinction at all.

  3. says

    Push back the Ummah. Otherwise they will attempt to make us dhimmi. This is not a religion. It is a dstructive criminal syndicate robbing their neighbors under the guise of religion. It has the code of Omuerta (not sure), ie., death to anybody who leaves the family and loyalty only to the family. The law of the land does not apply, only their codes. Really the more one thinks about the parallels are all their. And to call this a religion under a boss (pus be upon him)….. Yikes.

  4. says

    The Jihad against Hindus and Christians in Pakistan is becoming more widespread and violent all the time”no reason to believe that Sikhs would be spared.

    From the article:

    Sikhs and Hindus are tiny and embattled communities in Pakistan. As small, non-Muslim populations, especially in the volatile, religiously conservative northwest, they were easy prey for the Taliban. That’s why the population of Jogan Shah has spiked in recent years. Sikhs like Darsha Singh, displaced from his village of Orakzai in the war-ravaged tribal territories further northwest, have sought refuge with their co-religionists in Peshawar…
    ……………………………..

    Anyone who has read history should be deeply alarmed by this. This is the pattern of every persecution and pogrom against vulnerable minorities.

    The same thing is happening in Iraq, with Christians congregating in Baghdad or fleeing to the (formerly) somewhat more tolerant area of Mosul; with Christians in Egypt leaving villages where they have lived for 2000 years for the marginal safety of Cairo; with the miserable remnant of Jews in Yemen being removed to Sa’naa by the government “for their own safety”; with Chinese and Hindus in Indonesia pulling up stakes from outlying areas for Jakarta; with Christians in the “Palestinian territories” first crowding into neighborhoods in Bethlehem as the villages become too dangerous, then finally fleeing the region altogether in every increasing numbers.

    I could go on and on citing examples all over the “Muslim world”.

    Islam is increasingly spreading throughout sub-saharan Africa and infiltrating the West. At the same time, there is a growing effort by the Ummah to render greater and greater swaths of Dar-al-Islam empty of any other faith.

    Afghanistan and Somalia are two states”formerly lands of many faiths”that are now virtually entirely Muslim except for a handful of imperiled converts. They are also”no coincidence”probably the most violent and backward of “nations”, along with virtually all-Muslim Yemen.

    Pakistan seems well on its way”in stark contrast to multi-faith India”to murdering or pushing out all non-Muslims.

    I would say they are rendering such areas “Juderein””except that it applies not just to Jews, but to Christians, and Hindus, and Sikhs, and Jains, and Baha’i, and anyone else who doesn’t belong to the “Religion of Peace”.

    The terrible pattern is quite clear, and yet I don’t believe I have heard any Western politician or pundit refer to it.

  5. says

    http://newstime.co.nz/robert-spencer-what-about-the-violent-passages-in-the-bible.html
    VIDEO of excellent explaination of 9:29 by Robert Spencer

    The essence of Islamic teachings to live as a dhimmi
    (2nd class citizen) with NO rights (see Armenian Christians who refused to pay jizyah anlonger 1.5 millions Genocide by Ottoman Turks)

    only for the “People of the Book” (Bible) for “corrupting” it

    Quran 9:29 jizyah: protection tax
    Ali Sina Page 166 “…this is how the mafia operates”

    “no doubt” in the Quran (2:2)

    “You’re Cherry-Picking Verses Out of the Quran”
    http://schnellmann.org/http___www.jihadwatch.org_islam101_.pdf
    Islam 101 pdf 680 KB

  6. says

    dumbledoresarmy,
    The only distinction is that it’s an organized crime family AND insane cult in one. As you know.

    Sikhs and other non-Muslims should be admitted to the United States and Europe. Europe needs immigrants, so long as they are non-Muslims.

    Muslims, whose politico-religious system is fundamentally seditious to free societies, should be kept from immigrating to the West.

  7. says

    DDA, you may care to check out the latest piece of antisemitic ugliness in Melbourne.

    http://www.australiansforpalestine.com has put a BDS “manual” on their website. (I thought you would want to look at it in case you have trouble with your er digestive system…)

    In other words, they and their terrorgroupies will now stalk and harass businesses stocking Israeli products.
    Terrorism and Nazism growing in Melbourne…

    Might be time for a buycott a la Ahava in London.
    Should you need a new pair of shoes, i can now highly recommend Naot casual footwear. recently bought a pair and they are awesome. I have heard they are awesome for years, but this year was the first year I found something suitable.

  8. says

    I do not think they should attempt at all to fight the Taliban, who vastly outnumber them. That would be suicide. I mean, think about it. If the US+NATO forces have not been successful in wiping out the Taliban in eight years, what are 50 Sikh businessmen families.

    Secondly, the [almost entirely muslim] population of the area would not be accepting of Sikhs fighting their co-religionists even if they are Taliban.

    IMO, the Sikhs should leave Pakistan for India. Let the muslims sort things out among themselves in their Islamic way.

  9. says

    The Sikhs are so few in number, they have no hope of making a real improvement in their situation.

    They should leave for India asap, but publicise why they have to, to shame the Muslim world.

    Frits Bolkestein, a member of Geert Wilder’s party said very much the same, “For Jews recognizable as such I don’t see a future here, because of the anti-Semitism among Moroccan Dutch, whose number keeps increasing”.

    http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2010/12/lesson-worth-remembering.html#disqus_thread