"There is no society that has received large numbers of Muslims that has not soon been confronted by an Islamic defiance of existing societal norms"

Such is the extreme arrogance of these Turkish Muslim fanatics Trojan horse - the nerve of still conquering Cyprus and not recognizing the Armenian Genocide! Imagine, having the nerve to hold EU at ransom to force the EU to open its door to Islamic-rule and suspected Saudi-Iran backed Turkey, Bosnia and Albania- no wonder the Muslim fanatics are confident that EU will be again Ottomanized-Arabicized in another 10 years (such horror for Western/Judeo-Christendom civilization is sickening!)! Even in Germany here, it's so strange to have these migrants or refugees who claimed to be Armenians, Iranians, Azerbaijans, Romanians or Bulgarians - and yet they all speak Turkish! Thus we can see how Turkey has infiltrated into all the European/Western countries by stealth! And in recent news, Turkey is expanding aggressively into Bosnia especially Bosnia is getting EU membership. But do I blame these Muslim fanatics completely - no! It's the treacherous Western Left (esp. Socialist & the Green parties) leaders who have pushed for dominant Islamic migration into the West until it's beyond repair now, that is to fundamentally be blamed - in order to secure votes and dominant power for them! After all, lefty Socialist Hitler loved Islam!

I say AMEN (that I agree) to the above article!

Afraid of stepping in their own trap concerning the label racist no doubt plays a role in their ignoring the truth, but also, I think, not wanting to cast light onto the world's most treasured lie: all cultures are equal.

Here's an example of the Turkish influence on South St. Louis.

Look at once natural resources rich Christian-majority Africa - even in cocoa/oil-rich Ivory Coast (the pattern of targeting any oil-rich Islamic populated by suspected alliance of Saudi-Iran-Turkey's power is obvious, we can see how large Muslim refugees/migrants were able to transform the once Christian-dominated Ivory Coast into becoming an Islamic nation, with suspected backing of their Trojan horse Hussein Obama! See - FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
Outsiders trying to install Muslim in power
Obama's African buddy working to arrange departure of Ivory Coast president

Posted: January 04, 2011
9:32 pm Eastern

© 2011 WorldNetDaily

....Gbagbo, an openly practicing Christian, has his major backing from the southern Ivory Coast, while Quattara, a Muslim, has his main support from the Islamic-dominated northern part of the country.

Three presidents of the Economic Community of West African States, or ECOWAS, are to visit Gbagbo and urge him to leave power and give way to Quattara, possibly suggesting Gbagbo even leave the nation. They will be joined by African Union envoy and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga....It was Obama who barnstormed on behalf of Raila Odinga, the socialist who hails from the same tribal heritage, the Luo, as Obama, when Odinga was seeking the presidency in Kenya.

Appearing with Odinga at campaign stops, Obama gave speeches accusing the sitting Kenyan president of being corrupt and oppressive.

Then on Aug. 29, 2007, Raila Odinga signed a secret Memorandum of Understanding with Muslim Sheikh Abdullah Abdi, the chief of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya. In exchange for Muslim support, Odinga promised to rewrite the Kenyan constitution to install Shariah as law in "Muslim declared regions," elevate Islam as "the only true religion" and give Islamic leaders "oversight" over other religions, establish Shariah courts and ban Christian proselytism.....

(at - http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=247569)

Sometimes I think if we go down, they'll know we didn't surrender without a fight. We didn't go quietly into that good night, as the poem goes. But then again I think, who will be around to know ? Even if we put up a brave fight against stealth jihad, in the end even our struggle will be forgotten. It's a scary thought.

Excellent article by Kevin Myers! May it be read far beyond the Irish Independent.

For those who may have wondered about the reference to the "Greek wall", here's more information:

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/221196/Immigration-Greek-wall-to-stop-the-migrants

"GREECE has unveiled plans to build a giant 128-mile long wall along its border with Turkey to keep out illegal immigrants."

Sounds rather like the US border fence. Let's hope it's more effective.

Turkish Muslims are illegally pouring into already beleaguered Greece at an alarming rate.

"Athens complains that Turkey is not doing enough to stop the illegal migrants." No sh*t.

The fact is that for more than a millennium, Muslims have lived almost exclusively in Muslim majority states. Unlike, say, the Jews, Muslims have no cultural history as a minority. Indeed, according to their theology, THEY are the superior beings and, by right, should dominate the unbelievers.

It is no surprise, therefore, that wherever they find themselves in a minority position, the natural response is (depending on their relative numbers) to push for independence, autonomy, or special rights. And violence in pursuit of those aims is deemed completely legitimate as a "defense of Islam" and a striving for "justice".

Kudos to Kevin Myers for a great article. The last paragraph is particularly insightful.

It needs to be understood that Islamic society is unique and unparalleled among the other civilizations. Islam is sui generis and singular. Whatever resemblance to European civilization which it presents to us is a disguise, a false-front facade constructed by Muslims to camouflage themselves. They camouflage and mask their true nature in order to hide their true intentions; jihad. There is no such thing as one universal civilization of which Islam could be an example.

"defiance of existing societal norms". This is why the left supports these people. The last thing the left wants is any remnant of societal norms to remain. They are destroyers, so is Islam.

Excellent article! We will not have lost the war because the barbaric Islamic hordes, now sweeping the civilized earth, because of their dark will or even numerical superiority but because we chose to surrender the torch of Western Civilization to evil. We will die a quiet death not because we fought valiantly but because of apathy and the absence moral resolve.

The liberals in Washington certainly know this. The only reason for allowing large numbers of Muslims into this country it to dilute the Judeo-Christian vote with an anti-Judeo-Christian vote. It helps the Godless liberals to further their agenda.

Even worse than Islam is Western ignorance and timidity. A strong, resolute and enlightened West would be more than a match for all the Islamic world. Sadly, the West is in decline and this decline has been led by the forces of modern liberalism, none more hypocritical among these forces than Western feminists, who are, in effect, female jerks.

The cause of women's equality is a great one but it has, with deep irony, been derailed by modern feminism. One can easily be for women's rights while at the same time largely against the modern feminist agenda. My mother, sister and wife serve for me as examples of how a woman can be resolute and wise while disdaining the extra special idiocy which is modern feminism, itself a subset of a larger problem, i.e., modern liberalism.

I have a feeling that Islam is going to in the end conquer the whole world by the end of the next century. The battle is probably over already. The next generation of Americans have been prepared to accept Islam. We can't use physical force anymore because our military has already been infiltrated.

That the West hasn't mounted any response to the threat means that the West is almost dead. Any remembrance of our former freedom will be gone by the third generation. Since Islam can't make it without a host to consume, the world population will implode and humans will then go extinct.

None of my friends have any understanding at all, and one of my friends doesn't believe that we even have a right to kill others in self-defense. Westerners are hobbled by guilty feelings that no others humans have. And humans are not equipped to deal with future threats.

Kevin Myers is probably the only straight talking columnist in the British Isles. But he is lucky to write in Ireland as such an article in the UK press would finish him.

The last paragraph is dynamite. Speaking about the extinction of former Greco-Roman and christain civilizations in what are now Muslim lanmds. Here is the money quote. "What remains of them? The remains remain." Love it.

PMK, Scutum, Spirit:

How defeatest you sound! I for one, and anyone I can find, will NEVER acquiesce to Islam. The West and freedom-loving people the world over have ALWAYS, in the end, prevailed. Good will always prevail over evil. It doesn't necessarily happen over night, but it does, and will, happen. Islam is a self-defeating ideology and cannot survive forever. Even if it were to conquer the entire world, at some point democratic ideals would eventually re-emerge, and we would start all over. Keep the faith, brothers; all is not lost, and it's never over till the weight-challenged individual of the female persuasion sings!

Ima

Myres is a constant thorn in the side of liberals in Ireland, long may he continue.

http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/kevin-myers-cead-mile-failte-to-hell-mr-israeli-ambassador-2304976.html

In 1492 Spain brutally kicked Muslims out of their culture, ending centuries of unsuccessful Christian attempts to accomodate Muslims in order to retain its Christian culture. Is there any other historic example of a non-Muslim culture successfully saving its culture, other than by "kicking them out"? Was Spain guilty of ethnic cleansing? It saved their culture. How else can it done? Is that our only viable choice, to brutally "kick them out"?

In India - Islamic rulers were defeated repeatedly though not always conclusively.

In Southern India (roughly corresponding to the present states of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh) the Hindu Vijayanagar kings defeated Islamic rule, but Islamic forces reorganized and reconquered Karnataka a few centuries later. Likewise, numerous Hindu kings in Western Punjab resisted Islamic invaders for almost two centuries before being defeated. As did numerous Hindu chieftains in the Gangetic Plain. Just prior to the victory of the British East India Company in Bengal, Sikhs had managed to defeat the Islamic Mughal empire in Punjab and all of Punjab and Sindh (now in Pakistan) was under Sikh rule. Jat Hindus had overturned Islamic Mughal rule in parts of Northern India near Delhi. Hindu Marathas had defeated Islamic rulers in much of Western and Central India by the 18th C.

But this Hindu ascent was reversed by the British colonial rulers who sided with the reactionary Islamic elites against the Hindu masses and even oppressed sections of the Hindu nobility that resisted colonization.

The British elite collaborated with Islamists in the creation of Pakistan. Even today, Hindu nationalists are treated as pariahs by the liberal West.

Although Hindu India could not keep the Islamic invaders from winning battles and conquering territory - they resisted repeatedly and the vast majority of Hindus refused to convert. It was India's Buddhists who were the most defeatist - and it is they who converted in the largest numbers. Hindus had to be coerced and threatened into converting.

Hindus, Christians, Jews, Buddhists, and all thinking atheists and agnostics need to unite to defeat the menace of Jihadi Islam worldwide.