March 2011 Archives

March 31, 2011

When else are they going to get the West to actively and directly assist in installing Sharia regimes? You could almost say it's like Christmas for jihadis, except that would be awfully haram. "Islamist extremists 'elated' over Arab unrest," from the New York Times, April 1:

ANWAR AL-AWLAKI, pictured, the Yemeni-American cleric who is a propagandist for al-Qaeda, said Islamist extremists had gleefully watched the success of protest movements in the Arab world against governments they had long despised.
''The mujahedeen around the world are going through a moment of elation,'' he wrote in the English-language al-Qaeda magazine Inspire, ''and I wonder whether the West is aware of the upsurge of mujahedeen activity in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Arabia, Algeria and Morocco?''
A handful of al-Qaeda leaders have made statements countering the common view of Western analysts that the terrorist network looks irrelevant at a time of change unprecedented in the modern Middle East. In ousting the rulers of Tunisia and Egypt and threatening others, secular-leaning protesters have called for democracy and generally avoided violence - at odds with al-Qaeda's creed, aimed at instilling rigid Islamist rule.

And many in those countries and in the West are being played for fools by those who will promote and use "democracy" as a vehicle to impose Sharia.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That is the purpose of jihad in all its forms: the imposition of Islamic rule. When one peels back the layers of excuses du jour and claims of "underlying causes," that is what remains. "Al Qaeda Declares Southern Yemeni Province An 'Islamic Emirate'," by Grace Wyler for Business Insider, March 31 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has declared Yemen's Abyan province an "Islamic Emirate" and banned women from going outside, according to Eurasia Review and accounts from Yemeni journalists.
AQAP, which has established full control over the southern province, made an online statement Wednesday declaring Abyan an Islamic Emirate governed by Shariah.

First on the chopping block? Women's rights:

The statement said women in the province should not go out except under necessary circumstances, "and she who urgently needs to go out, should be with one of her male relatives, and should have ID with her."
AQAP's announcement comes just a few days after jihadists looted an ammunition factory in Ja'ar, a city in Abyan province, killing 150 people in an apparently accidental explosion. Al Qaeda militants have also taken control of local communications facilities in the province.
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

HizballahBunkerMap.jpg

And the world yawns at Hizballah's country-within-a-country, complete with "the strongest armed force in Lebanon." "Israel releases army map showing nearly 1,000 purported Hezbollah underground military sites," from the Washington Post, March 31 (thanks to all who sent this in):

JERUSALEM — The Israeli military on Thursday released a map detailing what it says are nearly 1,000 underground bunkers, weapons storage facilities and monitoring sites built by the militant Hezbollah guerrillas in southern Lebanon.
Many of the sites on the map are located south of the Litani River in Lebanon, the zone where Hezbollah is banned from keeping weapons under the U.N.-sponsored truce that ended Israel’s summer 2006 war with the guerrilla group.
An article on the military spokesman’s website says Hezbollah has set up some 550 bunkers, 300 monitoring sites and 100 weapons storage facilities. The facilities are located in 270 villages, and many are located near hospitals, private homes and schools, the military said in a statement published on its website.

Where's the outrage? Not in Washington, apparently, where the Obama administration is considering reaching out to "nonmilitary components" in Hizballah and Hamas that they suppose "can be drawn into a dialogue."

Israel and Hezbollah went to war after the Lebanese guerrilla group killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two others in a cross-border raid. Although Israel inflicted heavy damage on the group, it was unable to prevent it from firing some 4,000 rockets into Israel during the monthlong conflict.
Since then, Israel has accused Hezbollah of repeatedly violating the U.N.-brokered cease-fire by restocking its arsenal and covertly moving forces into south Lebanon, near the Israeli border. The map released Thursday was meant to provide new evidence against Hezbollah.
Israel believes Hezbollah now has more than 40,000 rockets, nearly three time the pre-war level, including more powerful weapons capable of reaching Israel’s Tel Aviv heartland.

Remember also that in 2004, U.N. Resolution 1559 demanded the disarmament of all Lebanese militia groups. Hizballah is the only group from Lebanon's civil war that failed to do so. They have had seven years not only to ignore this resolution (just like almost everyone else has where Hizballah is concerned), but to build an even larger army in defiance of it.

The militant group, which controls the strongest armed force in Lebanon, did not acknowledge or deny that the Israeli map was accurate and accused Israel of employing scare tactics....
| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On one hand, of course, everything is a Zionist plot. But on the other hand, let's stop and think about that for a moment, Bashar. Why would Israel plot to potentially have an even more unstable and hostile regime next door?

But that's the handy thing about conspiracy paranoia: it doesn't have to make sense. "Defiant Assad blames country’s turmoil on ‘Israeli plot’," by Oren Kessler for the Jerusalem Post, March 31:

Addressing his people for the first time since popular unrest erupted nearly two weeks ago, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Wednesday blamed a foreign conspiracy for the unrest and made no substantive pledges on implementing much-awaited reform.
“Our enemies work every day in an organized and public fashion to hurt Syria,” he told parliament. “Our enemies’ aim was to divide Syria as a country and force an Israeli agenda onto it, and they will continue to try and try again.”
Assad said Deraa, a southern city near the Golan Heights, where some of the bloodiest clashes with protesters have taken place, “is in the forefront in confronting the Israeli enemy and defending the nation.”
After the speech, hundreds took to the streets of the coastal city of Latakia – another hotbed of revolt in recent weeks – chanting “Freedom!” Several residents said they heard gunfire as security forces clashed with demonstrators.
Assad said he supported the principle of reform, but offered no specifics on changing Syria’s repressive one-party system.
“Implementing reforms is not a fad. When it’s just a reflection of a wave that the region is living, it is destructive,” he said.
“Syria today is being subjected to a big conspiracy, whose threads extend from countries near and far,” Assad added, without naming any countries. [...]
In Israel, analysts tried to envision the shape Syria might take in a post-Assad era.
“The idea that these regimes will be replaced by liberal democracies is too good to be true,” Moshe Maoz, a Syria expert at Hebrew University told Reuters. “If he stays he might prove more pragmatic.
He wants the Golan Heights from Israel. His father lost it... and the prestige involved is very important to him.”
“Any new regime is not going to be able to compromise its legitimacy by reaching any agreement with Israel,” said Gabriel Ben-Dor, of Haifa University....
| 57 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That detail mentioned in passing in the story below, but certainly deserves a wider hearing in the broader discussion of our undeclared war in Libya. "Bahrain hardliners to put Shia MPs on trial," by Adrian Blomfield for the Telegraph, March 31 (thanks to Zulu):

The kingdom’s parliament effectively stripped 11 MPs from the Wefaq party – a quarter of the legislature’s sitting members – of their immunity from prosecution, signalling a further hardening of the ruling family’s position.
Western human rights activists also accused the regime of torturing wounded protesters being held in a hospital in the capital Manama.
Bahrain has declared martial law and called in troops from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states to quell protests that have left at least 24 people dead.
Saudi officials say they gave their backing to Western air strikes on Libya in exchange for the United States muting its criticism of the authorities in Bahrain, a close ally of the desert kingdom.
Ali Salman, the Shiite opposition head has warned Iran and Saudi Arabia against using his country as a "battlefield" in a proxy war.
"We don't want Bahrain to turn into a conflict zone between Saudi Arabia and Iran," he said. "That's why we object to the Saudi intervention. We call for immediate withdrawal of the troops, and we reject Iranian interference."
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Creeping Sharia in action. Islamic law forbids the public expression or propagation of faiths other than Islam. But hey, let's try it in the West anyway, and no, really, this time it'll be different.

An update on this story. "Malaysian Christians say no to discriminatory government slogans on Bible," from AsiaNews, March 31:

Kuala Lumpur (AsiaNews / Agencies) - The Christian Federation of Malaysia has rejected the Government's proposal to release 35 thousand Bibles with “For Christianity” printed on the cover. The books, written in Malay, have been under lock and key since 2009 in the port where they arrived. The government had earlier decided to release them, but wanted to stamp a serial number and the slogan "Only Christians” on the cover. The controversy stems from a government decision to ban the use of the word "Allah" to refer to God by non-Muslims. The judiciary has decided against the government on this point, but a [date] for the appeal hearing has yet to be fixed.
The Malaysian Christians argue that there should be no "restrictions, prohibitions and proscriptions" in the use of the sacred books. The government wants to impose an inscription on the Bible, printed in Indonesia, to reduce the risk of Muslims converting.

Their paranoia makes them look weak.

The Bible Society of Malaysia, which imports and distributes Bibles, took charge of a shipment of five thousand Bibles "defaced" by the government writing on March 28. The general secretary of the company, Simon Wong, said that they "can not be sold to Christian buyers" in their current state. "Instead they will be respectfully kept as museum pieces, a witness of the Christian Churches in Malaysia." The president of the Christian Federation of Malaysia, Bishop Ng Moon Hing, said that "there is a systematic and progressive reduction of public space to practice, profess and express our faith. The freedom to wear and display crosses and other religious symbols, to use religious terms and to build places of worship has been progressively restricted. "
| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But, of course. Where would the jihad be without a massive sense of entitlement to reprisal and retribution? More on this story. "DFAT warns of Bali violence," from the Australian Associated Press, March 31 (thanks to Twostellas):

The federal government is warning the arrest of alleged Bali bomber Umar Patek could spark a violent response from extremists in Indonesia.
It is believed Patek, suspected of playing a key role in the 2002 nightclub bombings that killed 202 people, including 88 Australians, was arrested in Pakistan earlier this year.
Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd has hailed the arrest as a major win in the fight against terrorism.
But Mr Rudd's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is warning the arrest could spark a violent backlash.
"The reported arrest in Pakistan of Umar Patek ... may increase the risk of violent responses in Indonesia in the short term," DFAT says in its latest travel warning.
"On some occasions where high profile extremists have been detained or killed, there has been a strong response from some supporters in Indonesia, including acts of violence."
Recent information indicates terrorists may be planning attacks in Indonesia which could take place at any time, DFAT says.
Any terrorist attack is most likely to focus on places where large numbers of Westerners gather, it warns.
DFAT's overall level of advice for Indonesia remains "reconsider your need to travel".
Patek is suspected of having served as Jemaah Islamiah's deputy field commander for the Bali bombings.
The 40-year-old was the final senior planner of the 2002 attack still at large.
He is wanted in several countries, including Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United States.
He is believed to have trained in Afghanistan and Pakistan during the 1980s and 1990s and has been linked to al-Qaeda.
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just to put things in context, Rehman Malik is the same official who, just this past January, ordered the blocking of "un-Islamic" websites and text messages. He's also the one who said he would shoot a person who committed blasphemy against Islam in his presence. But no, Interpol, so long as it is not concerned with enforcing Sharia, still has more pressing matters to deal with. Like counterterrorism -- something Pakistan's ongoing duplicity and selective enforcement have allowed to grow into a monster that threatens the long-term existence of the country. Priorities.

More on this story. "Pakistani Minister calls on Interpol and the Pope to condemn Florida Koran burning," by Jibran Khan for Asia News, March 31:

Islamabad (AsiaNews) - The Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik - on the recommendation of President Asi Ali Zardari - has sent a letter to Pope Benedict XVI and the Secretary General of Interpol Ronald Nobel, in which calls on them to condemn the burning of the Koran and take action against the instigator, the American pastor Terry Jones. The Senate in Islamabad has also intervened on the episode, unanimously passing a resolution urging the U.S. to bring the controversial preacher to justice.
The mad act of Pastor Wayne Sapp, who last March 20 in Florida burned a Koran under the supervision of the evangelical preacher Terry Jones, has sparked controversy and violence. The initiative has been repeatedly strongly condemned by Christian leaders in Pakistan and India, defined as "an insane and disrespectful act” by a U.S. citizen that has nothing to do with the Christians of Pakistan. However, the burning of the Koran has sparked the reaction of Islamic fundamentalists who, in the space of a few days, have attacked three churches and killed two people, fueling the climate of fear and distrust within the Christian community.

What easily gets lost in this discussion is that offended Muslims do have the free will to control themselves if they so choose. It is telling how, in so many reports, the automatic, violent exercise of Muslim outrage is taken for granted, as though Jones and Sapp went out into the woods and poked a beehive with a stick.

And again, the intensity of attacks and ease of organization of this latest anti-Christian violence point to a rampage waiting for one pretext or another. In connecting their acts with the Qur'an burning, the attackers are seeking sympathy and a free hand to act as they please.

The letter addressed to the head of Interpol, explains Rehman Malik, demands that the matter be treated as a case of "violent crime" and that urgent measures be taken for the future, to ensure such episodes are not repeated. The resolution adopted unanimously by the Senate, as well as requiring urgent action against the pastor Terry Jones, calls on all Muslim countries to express their indignation against the United States and the United Nations to register a "shameful act" towards Islam.
The interior minister also condemns attacks on churches and the burning of some copies of the Bible, the work of Islamic fundamentalists. Malik explains that he has instructed security forces to investigate the matter and take "appropriate measures" to "safeguard the rights of minorities, their properties and sacred places."
In recent days, the Christian community has repeatedly emphasised that there are no ties between the United States, Pastor Terry Jones and Pakistani Christians, who "were born and belong only to the motherland." Bishop Anthony Rufin of Islamabad / Rawalpindi, has repeatedly reiterated that "we should not be equated to the Americans." Fr. Anwar Patras, a Catholic priest, has added that the Christian community, first of all, belongs to Pakistan: "We were born in this land and we will be buried here, we have no connection with Pastor Terry Jones and his sick ideas."
| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

So, don't tell anybody, ok? Good. We don't want that getting out while we're not sure if we know or care who it is we're arming. Despite the headline, this story has been widely reported by a number of news organizations. "Exclusive: Obama authorizes secret help for Libya rebels," by Mark Hosenball for Reuters, March 30:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, government officials told Reuters on Wednesday.
Obama signed the order, known as a presidential "finding", within the last two or three weeks, according to government sources familiar with the matter.
Such findings are a principal form of presidential directive used to authorize secret operations by the Central Intelligence Agency. This is a necessary legal step before such action can take place but does not mean that it will.
As is common practice for this and all administrations, I am not going to comment on intelligence matters," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a statement. "I will reiterate what the president said yesterday -- no decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any group in Libya."
The CIA declined comment.
News that Obama had given the authorization surfaced as the President and other U.S. and allied officials spoke openly about the possibility of sending arms supplies to Gaddafi's opponents, who are fighting better-equipped government forces.
The United States is part of a coalition, with NATO members and some Arab states, which is conducting air strikes on Libyan government forces under a U.N. mandate aimed at protecting civilians opposing Gaddafi.
Interviews by U.S. networks on Tuesday, Obama said the objective was for Gaddafi to "ultimately step down" from power. He spoke of applying "steady pressure, not only militarily but also through these other means" to force Gaddafi out.

"Other means": Commence "Operation Barry Manilow?"

Obama said the U.S. had not ruled out providing military hardware to rebels. "It's fair to say that if we wanted to get weapons into Libya, we probably could. We're looking at all our options at this point," he told ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer....
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 30, 2011

My, but he's "misunderstanding" Islam far from home. But the goal of jihad in all its forms is, after all, to impose Islamic law. That is why we find jihadists in "local" conflicts far removed from one another finding common cause and joining forces. "Bali bombing suspect Umar Patek 'arrested in Pakistan'," from BBC News, March 30:

One of Indonesia's top terror suspects, wanted in connection with the 2002 Bali bombing, has been captured in Pakistan, reports say.
Umar Patek, a suspected member of the militant group Jemaah Islamiah (JI), was detained earlier this year, local and foreign intelligence sources say.
Jakarta is sending a team of police officers to confirm his identity.
The 2002 attacks on nightclubs in the Indonesian tourist hub left 202 people dead, many of them foreigners.
The US, which lost seven nationals in the attack, was offering a $1m (£625,000) reward for his arrest.
Umar Patek is the only major suspect for the attack who has not been killed or arrested, says the BBC's Kate McGeown in Jakarta.
As well as the Bali bombings, he is alleged to have been involved in at least three other attacks in Indonesia - and to have links with militant groups in the southern Philippines and al-Qaeda members in other parts of Asia, our correspondent says.
There are no details about where or how the arrest was made, nor what he was doing in Pakistan.
Sidney Jones of the International Crisis Group told the BBC that his arrest could yield important information.
"Umar Patek is critical to understanding the terrorist networks in South East Asia. And because he appears to have been arrested in Pakistan, he's also going to be critical to understanding the networks between South Asia and South East Asia," she said.
"He's in a position to know more than almost anyone else in the region exactly what the strengths, networks, contacts, finances and so on of each of these groups is."
Jemaah Islamiah (JI), which has links to al-Qaeda, has a long track record of bomb attacks in Indonesia.
A suicide bomb attack in July 2009 targeted two luxury hotels, killing seven people.
JI's goal is the establishment of an Islamic state in Indonesia and in other parts of South East Asia.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

You never know. Maybe he'll claim his prayer "In the name of Allah The Beneficient, The Merciful. Nitro [urea] explosive is more powerful than T.N.T." was really just part of his Interior Spiritual Struggle. An update on this story. "Student pleads not guilty to bomb plot," by Betsy Blaney for the Associated Press, March 29:

LUBBOCK, Texas (AP) - A Texas college student from Saudi Arabia accused of buying chemicals and equipment to build a weapon of mass destruction has pleaded not guilty.
Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari entered his plea at his arraignment before U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Koenig at the federal courthouse Monday in Lubbock. Koenig set a May 2 trial date.
If convicted of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, he faces up to life in prison.
Court documents allege he hatched plans to attack various U.S. targets, including New York City and former President George W. Bush's Dallas home.
Authorities arrested Aldawsari on Feb. 23.
Court records indicate authorities traced his online purchases, discovered extremist online posts he made and secretly searched his apartment, computer and e-mail accounts and read his diary.

Excerpts can be found here, including his deliberate efforts to be placed in the U.S. in a study-abroad program.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On his way to Somalia. "Police make Toronto airport 'terrorism' arrest," by Julie Gordon for Reuters, March 30 (thanks to VQ):

TORONTO (Reuters) - A man was arrested for "terrorism-related offenses" at Toronto's international airport just before he was about to board an airplane bound for North Africa, Canadian police said on Wednesday.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) said 25-year-old Canadian citizen Mohamed Hassan Hersi was headed to Somalia to join al Shabaab, which police said is a hard-line Islamist group that has ties to al Qaeda.

"Al Shabaab is a listed terrorist entity," said RCMP Inspector Keith Finn at a press conference. "Any participation in that group would constitute an offense."

Hersi was arrested Tuesday evening at Toronto's Pearson International Airport, moments before he was to board a one-way flight to Cairo via London, the RCMP said. They said Hersi planned to travel to Somalia from Cairo....

"The issue of radicalization, and of people from Canada traveling overseas and receiving that type of indoctrination and training, remains a concern to the RCMP."

Good to know!

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This kind of thing arises from the Qur'an's requirement that four witnesses are required to establish a sexual crime, i.e., adultery, rape, etc. This is the Qur'an's chapter 24, where it unfolds this way: in verses 11-20 Allah furiously castigates a group that has “brought forward a lie” (v. 11) against a chaste woman, without producing four witnesses (v. 13). The deity scolds the believers as well, for crediting this obvious slander (vv. 12, 16). This is a most serious matter (v. 15), but the Qur’an doesn’t tell us what it’s all about. This hadith fills in the details. Allah had recently ordered the veiling of women (a command that is transmitted in v. 31), so Aisha, when she accompanied Muhammad to a battle, was carried in a curtained howdah on the back of a camel. The caravan stopped and Aisha got out to answer “the call of nature.” While returning she lost her necklace, and stopped to search for it. Meanwhile, her attendants, forbidden to look at her or speak to her, loaded the howdah back onto the camel without realizing that she wasn’t in it. “At that time,” Aisha explains, “I was still a young lady,” and what’s more, “women were light in weight for they did not get fat.”

And so the caravan left without her, and Muhammad’s favorite wife was stranded. Presently a Muslim warrior who was traveling behind the army came along, and was considerably startled to find Aisha alone. “I veiled my face with my head cover at once,” Aisha insisted, “and by Allah, we did not speak a single word, and I did not hear him saying any word besides his Istirja’” – a prayer spoken in times of distress. The warrior carried Aisha on his camel to the Muslims’ camp – and almost immediately the rumors started. Even Muhammad was affected by them. Aisha explains: “After we returned to Medina, I became ill for a month. The people were propagating the forged statements of the slanderers while I was unaware of anything of all that, but I felt that in my present ailment, I was not receiving the usual kindness from Allah’s Messenger which I used to receive when I got sick.”

Aisha was deeply distressed: “I kept on weeping that night till dawn, I could neither stop weeping nor sleep, then in the morning again, I kept on weeping.” Ali bin Abi Talib, who later became the great saint and hero of the Shi’ite Muslims, ungallantly reminds Muhammad that there are “plenty of women” available to the Prophet (Aisha never forgot or forgave this, and after Muhammad’s death, warred against Ali herself.) But Ali also advises Muhammad to ask Barira, Aisha’s slave girl, if she has seen anything, and Barira maintained that Aisha had done nothing wrong. Muhammad left the matter in Allah’s hands, telling Aisha: “I have been informed such-and-such about you; if you are innocent, then soon Allah will reveal your innocence, and if you have committed a sin, then repent to Allah and ask Him for forgiveness, for when a person confesses his sins and asks Allah for forgiveness, Allah accepts his repentance.”

Muhammad then received a revelation from Allah, as Aisha watched: “So there overtook him the same hard condition which used to overtake him (when he was Divinely Inspired) so that the drops of his sweat were running down, like pearls, though it was a (cold) winter day, and that was because of the heaviness of the Statement which was revealed to him. When that state of Allah’s Apostle was over, and he was smiling when he was relieved, the first word he said was, ‘Aisha, Allah has declared your innocence.’” Allah had revealed vv. 11-20.

Aisha, however, was still angry: “My mother said to me, ‘Get up and go to him.’ I said, ‘By Allah, I will not go to him and I will not thank anybody but Allah.’” Yet she was amazed by the revelation: “By Allah, I never thought that Allah would reveal in my favor a revelation which would be recited, for I considered myself too unimportant to be talked about by Allah in the Divine Revelation that was to be recited.”

But she was. And the false accusations against her brought about the requirement that four male Muslim witnesses must be produced in order to establish a crime of adultery or related indiscretions. Islamic law still requires the testimony of four male witnesses to establish sexual crimes (v. 13).

Consequently, it is even today virtually impossible to prove rape in lands that follow the dictates of the Sharia. Even worse, if a woman accuses a man of rape, she may end up incriminating herself. If the required male witnesses can’t be found, the victim’s charge of rape becomes an admission of adultery. That accounts for the grim fact that as many as seventy-five percent of the women in prison in Pakistan are, in fact, behind bars for the crime of being a victim of rape. When the Musharraf government instituted measures removing the crime of rape from the sphere of Islamic law and establishing that it be judged by modern canons of forensic evidence, a group of Islamic clerics were furious. They demanded that the new law be withdrawn: it would turn Pakistan into a “free-sex zone.” Clerics thundered that the new law was “against the teachings of Islam,” and had been passed only to appease the West.

So this is yet another element of the Sharia that only greasy Islamophobes oppose in America.

"Woman Jailed for Being Raped in Muslim Country Sues," from FoxNews, March 29:

An Australian woman is suing a five-star UAE hotel after she was drugged and raped by co-workers - but ended up in jail for eight months for having sex outside marriage.

Alicia Gali, 29, had her drink spiked and was raped by four co-workers at the luxury Le Meridien Al Aqah Beach Resort in the United Arab Emirates in June 2008.

She is seeking compensation from her former employer for breaching its workplace duty of care after she reported the assault to authorities, only to be jailed for eight months on an adultery charge.

Ms Gali spent eight months in prison as it is illegal as having sex outside marriage in the UAE is illegal....

| 46 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Facebook's record of pulling anti-jihad groups and leaving pro-jihad groups in place is well established. But this one was just too egregious even for the Leftist dhimmis who run Facebook.

"Facebook drops 'intifada' page for promoting violence," from the BBC, March 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Facebook has removed a page calling for a new Palestinian uprising against Israel after more than 350,000 people signed up to it.

The page which appeared on the social networking site was called Third Palestinian Intifada after two previous uprisings against Israeli occupation.

It was removed for featuring calls for violence, a company spokesman said.

Israel had raised concerns about the page. Facebook has helped spread calls for protests in Arab states.

The Third Palestinian Intifada page had called for an uprising after Muslim prayers on Friday 15 May.

"Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once the Muslims have killed all of the Jews," a quote from the page read....

Funny thing: when I quote that hadith, Islamic apologists claim it's inauthentic and that no Muslims believe it. And yet somehow these Facebook genocide fans didn't seem to get the memo.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

English translation of an op-ed piece that Geert Wilders published today in the Dutch magazine “HP/De Tijd.”

To know why Islam is a mortal danger one must not only consider the Koran but also the character of Muhammad, who conceived the Koran and the entirety of Islam.

The Koran is not just a book. Muslims believe that Allah himself wrote it and that it was dictated to Muhammad in the original version, the Umm al-Kitab, which is kept on a table in heaven. Consequently one cannot argue with the contents. Who would dare to disagree with what Allah himself has written? This explains much of Muhammadan behaviour, from the violence of jihad to the hatred and persecution of Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims and apostates. What we in the West regard as abnormal, is perfectly normal for Islam.

A second insuperable problem with Islam is the figure of Muhammad. He is not just anyone. He is al-insan al-kamil, the perfect man. To become a Muslim one must pronounce the Shahada (the Muslim creed). By pronouncing the Shahada one testifies that there is no god that can be worshipped except Allah, and one testifies that Muhammad is his servant and messenger.

The Koran, and hence Allah, lays down that Muhammad’s life must be imitated. The consequences of this are horrendous and can be witnessed on a daily basis.

There has been much analysis of Muhammad’s mental sanity. In spite of all the available research, it is rarely mentioned or debated. It is a taboo to discuss the true nature of the man whom one and a half billion Muslims around the world regard as a holy prophet and example to be followed. That taboo must be breached in the West, and here in the Netherlands.

Ali Sina is an Iranian ex-Muslim who established the organisation for apostates of Islam Faith Freedom International. In his latest book he posits that Muhammad is a narcissist, a paedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter (*). Sina has offered 50,000 dollars for the one who can prove otherwise. Nobody has claimed the reward as yet. And no wonder, as the description is based on the Islamic texts themselves, such as the hadiths, the descriptions of Muhammad’s life from testimonies of contemporaries.

The historical Muhammad was the savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina. Without scruples they looted, raped and murdered. The sources describe orgies of savagery where hundreds of people’s throats were cut, hands and feet chopped off, eyes cut out, entire tribes massacred. An example is the extinction of the jewish Kurayza tribe in Medina in 627. One of those who chopped off their heads was Muhammad. The women and children were sold as slaves. Confronted with the lunacy of Islamic terrorists today, it is not hard to find out where the lunacy comes from.

In Vienna the women’s rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was recently sentenced to paying a fine for insulting a religion by calling Muhammad a paedophile. However, that is the truth. Numerous hadiths contain testimonies by Muhammad’s favourite wife, the child wife Aisha. Aisha literally says: “The prophet married me when I was six years old, and had intercourse with me when I was nine.”

According to the historian Theophanes (752-817) Muhammad was an epileptic. Epileptic crises are sometimes accompanied by hallucinations, perspiration form the forehead and foaming at the mouth, the very symptoms which Muhammad displayed during his visions.

In his book “The other Muhammad” (1992) the Flemish psychologist dr. Herman Somers concludes that in his forties the “prophet” began to suffer from acromegaly, a condition caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland, a small organ that is situated just below the brain. When the tumor in the pituitary gland causes too much pressure in the brain, people start to see and hear things that are not there. Somers’s psychopathological diagnosis of Muhammad’s condition is: organic hallucinatory affliction with paranoid characteristics.

The German medical historian Armin Geus speaks of a paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenia. A similar analysis can be found in the book “The Medical Case of Muhammad” by the physician Dede Korkut.

In his book “Psychology of Mohammed: Inside the Brain of a Prophet” Dr. Masud Ansari calls Muhammad “the perfect personification of a psychopath in power.” Muhammad had a unhinged paranoid personality with an inferiority complex and megalomaniac tendencies. In his forties he starts having visions that lead him to believe he has a cosmic mission, and there is no stopping him.

The truth is not always pleasant or politically correct. On the basis of the research referred to above it can be argued that the Islamic creed obliges one and a half billion people around the world, including the one million living in the Netherlands, to take Muhammad as their example. There is no turning back once one has become a Muslim. For even though article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every person has the right to “change his religion or belief,” in Islam there is a death penalty for leaving the faith.

Anyone who voices criticism of Islam and Muhammad is in grave personal danger – as I have experienced. And whoever attempts to escape from the influence of Islam and Muhammad risks death. We cannot continue to accept this state of affairs. A public debate about the true nature and character of Muhammad can provide insight and support to Muslims all over the world who wish to leave Islam.

Apostates are heroes and more than ever they deserve the support of freedom loving people all over the world. Party politics should not be at play in this matter. It is time for us to help these people by exposing Muhammad.

Geert Wilders is an MP in the Netherlands. He is the Chairman of the Party for Freedom (PVV)

This article was published in the Dutch weekly magazine “HP/De Tijd” of March 30, 2011

(*) http://www.jpost.com/Home/Article.aspx?id=104835

| 87 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic apologists in the West routinely claim that the dhimma is a thing of the past, and that only greasy Islamophobes think otherwise. Muhammad Hassan must be a greasy Islamophobe. "No 'Revolution' for Egypt's Christians," by Raymond Ibrahim in FrontPageMagazine.com (via RaymondIbrahim.com), March 22:

On March 5, Muslims attacked, plundered, and set ablaze an ancient Coptic church in Sool, a village near Cairo, Egypt. Afterwards, throngs of Muslims gathered around the scorched building and pounded its walls down with sledge hammers—to cries of "Allahu Akbar!" Adding insult to injury, the attackers played "soccer" with the relic-remains of the church's saints and martyrs and transformed the desecrated church into a mosque (a live example of history, which witnessed countless churches seized and transformed into mosques). As a result of Christian girls being abducted and raped and overall terrorization of the Coptic community, thousands fled the village. (See this letter to Egypt's military leadership signed by twenty congressmen discussing this and similar anecdotes.)

This latest church rampage was initiated by Muslims killing each other over an affair between a Christian man and a Muslim woman—and then transferring their violence onto the Copts of the region and their church.

Radical sheikh Muhammad Hassan, who was commissioned to investigate the incident, recently shared his "findings" on Egyptian TV. After insisting to Coptic viewers that "Islam is a religion of peace, mercy, and justice," he said that the "Muslim youth" who attacked the church never intended to do so; rather, they went there searching for a Coptic man. After invading the church, they discovered ancient liturgical books in the Coptic script, and papers with the names of Muslims. These were interpreted as "sorcery"—hence, they destroyed the church. (The fact is, some Muslims venerate St. Mary and often submit their names at churches for intercession.)

Not once did Hassan condemn the Muslim perpetrators. He even referred to the Copts as "dhimmis" and "pact-holders," prompting outrage among Egypt's indigenous Christian population, or as one Copt put it: "Hassan wants to make Dhimmis out of us… I thought we were living in [a] country with a constitution and a police force and not in Mecca or Medina, 14 centuries ago. Or maybe this is a first step to later subject Christians to Jizya for protection."...

Read it all.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 29, 2011

Common sense cutting through the enveloping fog of politically correct disinformation. "GOP senator turns the tables at Muslim rights hearing," by Stephanie Condon for CBS News, March 29:

Defenders of Muslim civil rights went to Capitol Hill today to ask the federal government to stem what they say is a rising tide of anti-Muslim discrimination. Yet for one Republican senator, the real question was whether Muslim advocacy groups are doing enough to help the government curb Islamic extremism.

Today's Senate hearing, led by Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), is the first in Congress to explore Muslim civil rights. It is intended to show that most Muslim Americans "are patriotic, law abiding people who simply want to live their life as we do," Durbin said today.

Republican Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), however, questioned the need for the hearing and suggested one of the groups testifying could do more to cooperate with the government.

"I'm a bit perplexed by the focus" of the hearing, Kyl said, in light of the fact that most religious hate crimes in the United States are committed against Jews.

"The point is, all bigotry is to be condemned," Kyl said. "Selective indignation is not helpful."

Today's hearing comes about three weeks after a controversial House hearing on the radicalization of Muslim Americans that critics said unfairly portrayed the Muslim community. Farhana Khera, the executive director of the group Muslim Advocates, testified in today's hearing that "in the last several months, anti-Muslim rhetoric has reached a disturbing new level." He said political leaders have jumped into the fray with sweeping, critical statements about Islam.

While Khera whines about rhetoric, Muslims are brutalizing and persecuting Christians in Egypt, Pakistan, and elsewhere. But that receives no notice from the likes of Khera.

Kyl defended the hearing over Muslim radicalization today, saying, "Political correctness cannot stand in the way of identifying those who would do us harm." He questioned whether Khera's organization was committed to helping root out extremist elements of Islam, given that its website advises Muslims to consult a lawyer before speaking with the FBI about violent extremism.

"I would think Muslim Americans would feel a special obligation to help in such investigations," Kyl said....

One would think!

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I agree: even one case of bullying, violence or workplace harassment against an innocent person goes beyond what Americans should accept. But apparently it is not also true that even one case of jihad terrorism or Islamic supremacist bullying and demand for accommodation of Sharia goes beyond what Americans should accept. When Muslims commit acts of jihad terrorism or demand that non-Muslims change the way they do business in order to accommodate Sharia, if non-Muslims complain, that becomes blaming all Muslims for the evils done by a tiny minority.

"Senators decry anti-Muslim violence," by Kelly Kennedy for USA Today, March 29:

WASHINGTON — Republican and Democratic senators at an anti-Muslim discrimination hearing Tuesday agreed on one point: Even one case of bullying, violence or workplace harassment goes beyond what Americans should accept.

"Those who use this type of rhetoric, who burn Qurans and who engage in other forms of bigotry and discrimination may be few in number, but their bigoted conduct and remarks violate the spirit of our Bill of Rights," said Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin, D-Ill., chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights.

But while commitee [sic] Democrats said special attention should be paid to hate crimes committed against Muslims in the USA, Republicans argued that Muslim Americans have not done enough to fight radicalism in their own communities.

"Get in this fight," said Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C. "You're going to have to help your country. You're probably uniquely qualified, compared to anyone else, to understand what's going on and fight back."

We've been waiting almost ten years for this, since 9/11. How long?

The hearing comes two weeks after Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., conducted a controversial House hearing looking into how extremist groups lure American Muslims to become violent. A number of Muslim Americans felt their community was singled out for the terrorist acts of a few....

A lot of non-Muslim Americans feel their communities are singled out by the terrorist acts of a few Muslims that the other Muslims don't seem interested in reining in or teaching against or resisting in any way. Indeed, they grow offended when one asks them to do so.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It certainly would be convenient for Pitts for a Bible-quoting Christian terrorist to emerge, to balance out the hundreds of Qur'an-quoting Islamic terrorists (click on the links below). If one ever did emerge, we'd never heard the end of it -- but until then, old Tim McVeigh, an atheist anarchist to all appearances, will have to keep on being dragged out to serve this purpose "Pop quiz | Bible or Quran: which is the violent book?," by Leonard Pitts Jr. in the Pioneer Press, March 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

OK, put your books away. We're having a pop quiz.

Below are four quotes. Each is from one of two sources: the Bible or the Quran, although, just to make things interesting, there's also a chance all four are from one book. Two were edited for length and one of those was also edited to remove a religion-specific reference. Your job: identify the holy book of origin. Ready? Go:

# "...Wherever you encounter (non-believers), kill them, seize them, besiege them, wait for them at every lookout post ..."

# "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword."

# "If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, 'Let us go and worship other gods' ... do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. You must certainly put him to death."

# Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."

All right, pens down. How did you do?

If you identified the first quote as being from the Quran (9:5) and the other three as originating in the Bible (Matthew 10:34, Deuteronomy 13:6-9, Numbers 31:17-18), I congratulate you on that degree in theology. If I have guessed correctly, most people will not have found it easy to place the quotes in their proper books. If I have guessed correctly, most people will have found a certain thematic similarity in them.

Yes, there is a point here: I wish people would stop cherry-picking warlike quotes from the Quran to "prove" the evil of Islam. You see this stuff all over the web. Just a few days ago, some anonymous person, angry with me for defending "Fascist/Nazi Islam" the writer says is trying to kill us all, sent me an email quoting Quranic exhortations to violence to prove that Islam is a "religion of hate and murder."

I, too, wish that people would stop cherry-picking warlike quotes from the Qur'an -- people like bin Laden, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and Feisal Shahzad, and Abdulhakim Muhammad, Khalid Aldawsari, Baitullah Mehsud, and Roshonara Choudhry. If Muslims like that would stop quoting the Qur'an and Islamic teachings to justify violence against unbelievers, I promise to stop pointing out that they're doing so.

As rhetorical devices go, it is a cheap parlor trick, a con job to fool the foolish and gull the gullible and for anyone who has spent quality time with the Bible, its shortcomings should be obvious.

If not, see the pop quiz again. The Quran is hardly unique in its admonitions to take up the sword.

It is not my intention here to parse any of those troubling quotes. Let us leave it to religious scholars to contextualize them, to explain how they square with the contention that Islam and Christianity are religions of peace. For our purposes, it is sufficient to note that, while both Christian and Muslim scholars will offer that context and explanation, only Christians can be assured of being taken at their word when they do.

It also may help, Mr. Pitts, that there are no Christians committing or advocating violence by reference to those Biblical verses today, but an abundance of Muslims worldwide committing and advocating violence by reference to Qur'an verses.

Christians get the benefit of the doubt. Muslims get Glenn Beck asking a Muslim congressman to "prove to me that you are not working with our enemies."

Because Christianity is regarded as a known — and a norm. Muslims, meantime, have been drafted since Sept. 11, 2001, to fulfill the nation's obsessive, historic, paranoiac and ongoing need to rally against an enemy within. We lost the Commies, but along came the Islamofascists. The names change. The endless capacity for irrational panic remains the same.

Is it really irrational to be concerned about what motivated Muslims like Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and so many other jihad murderers and would-be murderers? Is it really irrational to wonder if there's something about Islam when all of them and more point to Islamic texts and teachings to justify their attacks and plots?

As in people who send out emails insisting upon the rightness of holding over a billion people — that bears repeating: "over a billion people" — responsible for the actions of, what ...? A few hundred? A few thousand?...

Pitts is here retailing common Islamic supremacist talking points -- that the idea of "collective responsibility" is wrong, and that Muslims as a whole cannot and must not be made to bear any kind of responsibility for jihad attacks by other Muslims. In reality, no one with any sense is blaming all Muslims for anything that any individual Muslim has done; the problem lies in the Islamic texts and teachings that are used to justify such acts of violence. There is ample justification in the Qur'an, which calls upon Muslims to fight Christians until they "feel themselves subdued" (9:29), and the Sunnah, in which Muhammad tells his followers to offer non-Muslims conversion or subjugation, and to go to war with them if they refuse both, for jihad attacks. Muslims who oppose such attacks need ultimately to confront the existence of these Islamic teachings and work honestly to blunt their force, but non-Muslims need make no apology for recognizing that this is not being done within the Muslim community now, and making a realistic appraisal accordingly, and taking what steps must be taken to defend themselves and their way of life.

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pamela Geller has the details here of how Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group CAIR is trying to get her dropped from hearings in Alaska tomorrow about anti-Sharia legislation. (CAIR doesn't know who else is testifying, or they'd be sending out another flurry of lie-filled press releases.)

This is a group that consistently opposes anti-terror measures, has misrepresented the political and supremacist nature of Sharia in efforts to combat anti-Sharia legislation, and more. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements.

This is the group trying to dictate to Alaska legislators on their choice of speakers, and defaming a freedom fighter in the process. Free Americans should not let this unsavory Hamas-linked gang of thugs get away with this. Contact Rep. Gatto’s Chief of Staff Karen Sawyer to request that Pamela Geller be retained as a witness. E-Mail: karen.sawyer@legis.state.ak.us, Copy to: info@cair.com and director@jihadwatch.org. Tel: 907-465-5025

Please be polite and respectful, and thank Sawyer for allowing voices of truth and freedom to be heard. Urge her not to give in to this subversive Hamas front.

Pamela Geller has more here, including responses to Hamas-linked CAIR's libelous charges.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Many in the West will assume equal rights for Christians will happen more or less automatically, or are not truly an issue under Sharia law, which apologists portray as a complex system that shape-shifts like the goop in a lava lamp the moment some skeptical non-Muslim observes something unpleasant about human rights.

Outside of the West, non-Muslims know better, and they know from experience as well as the content of Islamic texts: Sharia is a vehicle for Islamic supremacism and the subjugation of non-believers. Therefore, constitutions that set Sharia as the supreme law of the land (as with Article 2 of Egypt's constitution) have written inequality for non-believers into their national DNA, so to speak.

Archbishop Sako has warned before that the West indeed cannot fully grasp the dangers of Islamization, a danger heightened by blind faith in "democracy" alone to ensure respect for human rights. "True Democracy in Muslim Countries Only If Christians Are Equal Citizens," Says Assyrian Bishop," by Joseph Mahmoud for Asia News, March 29:

Würzburg -- "Aid to the Church in Need" organised a world conference titled "Welt Kirche in Würzburg", in Germany on 18-20 March 2011, on the situation of Christians in Muslim counties. Many bishops from Egypt, Pakistan, Iraq and Nigeria and elsewhere took part in the event. Mgr Louis Sako, archbishop of Kirkuk, was among them. He expressed serious concerns about how 'Jasmine Revolutions' were developing in many countries of North Africa and the Middle East.
The Chaldean prelate saw few signs of optimism in the events now unfolding in Arab countries, like mass protests and popular unrest, which have front-page in newscasts, newspapers, magazines and websites. The sight of crowds praying or shouting slogans gives the impression of a wave of extremism.
Media are always talking about Islamic parties. Many Muslims want an Islamic state. After the collapse of regime that lacked a direction and vision, questions abound. Will things improve? Will there be security? Who comes next? Who is pushing these masses of young people? Who is funding the movement? I hope things will evolved differently in Iraq.
The bishop described the situation in Iraq, where for the past eight years, "we have lived with different kinds of oppression. Establishing freedom and democracy takes time and education, especially a separation between politics, which is based on interests, and religion, which is based on ideals that cannot be compromised."
"Democracy cannot function if Islam is not updated. We must work together for a civilian state in which the only criterion is citizenship," he said.
"In Iraq, the post-Saddam government, and the people, have proclaimed democracy, but democracy cannot be imposed by pushing a magic button. Eight years after the US invasion, we do not have democracy in Iraq. Indeed, we have groups fighting each. Instead of democracy, we have a growing sectarian problem, with expulsions, abductions and attacks."
"We Christians are at a disadvantage, socially and religiously discriminated. More than half of the country's Christians have left, but others are leaving as well. The exodus is never-ending. If Islamisation continues, there will be no Christians left. A million Christians used to live here; now 400,000 are left. Christians certainly respect Muslims, but Muslims must also recognise Christians are real citizens, not as second-class citizens. There must be a clear and courageous decision by the state, as well as Muslim authorities."
In fact, Mgr Sako issued an appeal to Muslim authorities. "It is necessary," he said, "that Muslim religious leaders get involved in dialogue to build a multicultural and multi-religious society and reduce inter-religious tensions and conflicts so as to build true coexistence. Sectarian and provocative speeches do not help humanity's development and are contrary to the universal religious message of 'Peace on earth'."
"We must work together for a civilian state in which the only criterion is citizenship. The government, police, army, courts and all institutions should uphold the law and maintain order among all citizens."
| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The ease of organization, intensity of these attacks, and disregard for the complete and obvious lack of affiliation between Pakistani Christians and one man's congregation in Florida show this wave of anti-Christian violence was a rampage waiting for an excuse. If Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp had not burned a Qur'an, the attackers would have found another opportunity to seize upon. After all, accusing local Christians of damaging Qur'ans is a popular pretext for violence across the Muslim world. In connecting their actions with the Qur'an burning, they are seeking sympathy and an excuse to act as they please.

They hope that people will blame Jones more than the people torching churches (at the price of implying that Muslims do not have the free will to restrain themselves), thereby tacitly endorsing the notion that the burning of one Qur'an is equivalent in magnitude to a yet undetermined number of burnt churches.

An update on this story. "Third church attacked as Pakistani extremists declare war over Florida Koran burning," by Jibran Khan for AsiaNews, March 29:

Islamabad (AsiaNews) - An armed group of seven people attacked the Catholic Church of St. Thomas in the military district of Wah, about 45 km from Islamabad. The attack took place at 6.30 pm yesterday, while the security guard was absent. The extremists hurled stones, damaged the building and tried to set fire to it, but they did not shoot. Yesterday's was the third attack against a church in Pakistan less than a week. The escalation of violence is a result of the mad act - repeatedly condemned by Christians in Pakistan and India – of pastor Wayne Sapp, who last March 20, in Florida burned a copy of the Koran under the supervision of the evangelical preacher Terry Jones.
The caretaker of the church of St. Thomas confirmed that the attack occurred yesterday, at about 6.30 pm, taking advantage of the absence of the security guard. A group of six or seven armed men broke through a small door and started throwing stones at the windows, smashing the small lamps and tried to break the door. The caretaker called the priest and the police, he is currently still in shock and does not intend to make statements.
The extremists were armed, but did not open fire. Unable to break down the door, they tried to set it on fire. The parish priest, Fr Yousaf, rushed to the scene of the attack and tried to reassure the small Christian community. "It's a reaction - the priest told AsiaNews - to the desecration of the Koran in Florida, although the Catholic community has condemned the act. We pointed out clearly that we have no link with the Americans. At the time of the attack there were no guards, the police are present only on Sundays. "
Pastor Tariq Emmanuel, who lives near the church, added that the assailants did not open fire "because it is a high security area" and the military would have reacted immediately in the event of gunfire. "The forces of order – he adds - have asked to install closed circuit security cameras and private guards of the Christian faith", the only available. Christians now "no longer believe the promises of protection" of the police, especially after the murder of Salman Taseer and Shahbaz Bhatti.
Msgr. Anthony Rufin, Bishop of Islamabad / Rawalpindi, strongly condemns the latest attack on the Christian community of Pakistan and once again distances the church from the burning of the Koran in the United States. "We have already explained – says the prelate - we are Pakistani Christians, not Americans. We have repeatedly reiterated that we should not be equated to the Americans. " He adds that the police "have started to investigate”, but in the past the parish "had not received threats of any kind. "
The bishop of Islamabad points the finger at what he calls the "most troubling" part of the story. "The church of St. Thomas – he points out - is located near a high security zone, which is the only ammunition dump located in Pakistan, and as a result reinforced area. In addition, there are 4 barriers at the entrances of the military district of Wah, which means the assailants did not come from outside. " The prelate calls to take urgent action and anticipates the intention to arrange a meeting with Christian leaders, from the Anglican Church and other Protestant denominations to examine the current situation "of minorities. The young Pakistani Christians, in fact, do not see any reason for hope in the future.
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

UK_MAC_Royals.jpg

This is the same group that provoked public outrage by disrupting the traditional Armistice Day moment of silence and burning large replicas of the poppy, Britain's symbol of remembrance and respect for fallen soldiers, while chanting "British soldiers burn in hell," and holding banners proclaiming that "Islam will dominate."

If you're not exactly charmed by that sort of behavior, you'll like it even less knowing the man charged and fined for disturbing the peace in that case works only part-time and takes in £792 a month in state benefits.

For their next act of interfaith dialogue, they're targeting the royal wedding. With such behavior and propaganda like the graphic shown above, it is easy to ask: why are you even in Britain? If it's so awful, why not leave? But there are two answers to that: first, they are there to dominate, to remake Britain into an Islamic republic. The second answer: Why would they stop when they are being rewarded with womb-to-tomb benefits, all the while threatening and cursing the kuffar with their mouths full?

From Muslims Against Crusades (thanks to Watling):

On 29th April 2011, what is probably one of the most anticipated events in recent years will be due to take place at Westminster Abbey; Prince William and Kate Middleton, will soon exchange matrimonial vows, in the presence of a global audience.
Unfortunately, Britain's continued interference in Muslim lands is showing no signs of abating; the plundering of resources, the murdering of innocent (Muslim) men, women and children and the forced indoctrination of the satanic democratic creed have become hallmarks of a brutal regime led by a very brutal dictator.

"Innocent (Muslim)." We read you loud and clear.

In the backdrop of all this, we find that one of the biggest advocates of British imperialism, Flight Lieutenant Prince William, wishes to enjoy an extravagant wedding ceremony, ironically at the expense of the tax-payer.
His direct involvement with the murderous British military and eagerness to inherit the reigns of a kingdom built on blood and colonialism clearly demonstrate what type of legacy he wishes to leave.
In light of this, sincere Muslims have decided to organise a forceful demonstration, to once again highlight that as long Britain continues in its quest to occupy Muslim land and wage war against the religion of God (Allah) that we too shall continue in our efforts to undermine their regime and condemn all of their representatives, military or otherwise.
We strongly advise Prince William and his Nazi sympathiser, to withdraw from the crusader British military and give up all affiliation to the tyrannical British Empire.
We promise that should they refuse, then the day which the nation has been dreaming of for so long will become a nightmare and that it will inshaa'allah (God willing) eclipse the protests in Barking, Downing Street and the events of November 11.

One more charming graphic from their site:

UK_MAC_burningCrown.jpg

| 66 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Five Iranians are listed as wanted by Interpol for the bombing of the community center. Argentina was apparently prepared let that all slide, deciding that writing off the loss of 114 lives in the two attacks was cheaper than losing a trade deal. "Israel angered by Argentine 'deal' to stop Iran terrorist inquiry," by Robin Yapp for the Telegraph, March 29:

President Cristina Kirchner's government allegedly indicated it was prepared to suspend inquiries into attacks on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the Argentine Israeli Mutual Association in 1994, that killed 114 people.
Ali Akbar Salehi, the Iranian foreign minister, is said to have written to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to tell him Argentina "is no longer interested in solving these two attacks, but would rather improve its economic relations with Iran."
The memo, which was leaked to the Argentinian newspaper Perfil, was apparently written after Hector Timerman, the Argentine Foreign Minister, met with Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, a close ally of Iran, in January.
The July 1994 car bomb attack on the seven-storey Jewish centre in Buenos Aires, killed 85 people and left up to 300 injured, making it the country's worst terrorist attack.
Two years earlier a bomb had destroyed the Israeli embassy in the capital of Argentina, killing 29 people and injuring more than 240.
Argentine officials, the United States and Israel have all blamed Iran for orchestrating the two bombings, which they say were carried out by Hezbollah.
Ahmad Vahidi, Iran's defence minister, is one of five people wanted by Interpol for the 1994 bombing.
Iran has denied involvement in the attacks.
An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman said that if the claims about Mr Timerman were true, "then it would be a display of infinite cynicism and a dishonor to the dead."
He said he was awaiting an official comment from Argentina amid reports that Israel could postpone a visit Mr Timerman is due to make there next week as a result of the claims.
The Argentine Foreign Ministry has not made any statement on the matter.
Trade between Argentina and Iran is currently worth around $1.2bn (£750m) a year.
| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Durbin.jpg


In Human Events today, I discuss the PC charade of the Durbin hearing:

The FBI reports that anti-Jewish hate crimes are nearly eight times more common than anti-Muslim attacks—yet Sen. Richard Durbin (D.-Ill.) announced last week that he was going to hold a Senate hearing not on the resurgence of anti-Semitism, but on “anti-Muslim bigotry.”

For the truth-adverse Left, it was just another day at the office.

Compounding the irony was the fact that as Durbin announced his plans for this orgy of Muslim victimhood posturing, Islamic jihadists set off a bomb at a bus stop in Jerusalem, murdering at least one woman and wounding 30, while other Islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two Christians who had committed the crime of attending a church in Pakistan. And don’t ask Egyptian Christian Ayman Anwar Mitri what he heard about this: Muslims in Egypt cut off his ear last week for the crime of having an affair with a Muslim woman (which he denies). Islamic law forbids Muslim women to marry non-Muslim men, and so as his Muslim attackers severed Mitri’s ear, they told him: “We have applied the law of Allah, now come and apply your law.”

No doubt Durbin’s Islamic supremacist puppet masters told him nothing about any of this. They were intent on making sure he retaliated for the hearings recently conducted by Rep. Peter King (R.-N.Y.), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-Muslim human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and terror analyst Walid Phares.

Durbin’s retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy Rep. Keith Ellison (D.-Minn.), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief operating arm in the U.S. Ellison used the bully pulpit King gave him to paint a lurid picture of Muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country during the last two years.

Durbin can’t top Ellison, no matter which Muslim leader he brings in and coaches on how to shed crocodile tears....

There is more.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Losing our Sons" is a documentary film investigation into the first successful homegrown jihad terrorist attack on American soil. This is the story of a young African-American man from Memphis who converted to Islam, went to Yemen for terrorism training, and came back to murder a young Marine in Little Rock, Arkansas.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 28, 2011

Two were Christians were just killed outside a church in Pakistan last week, and now two more have been killed because a Qur'an was burned in Florida. Note that we have never seen anything approaching this kind of rage over the alleged "hijacking" of Islam by jihadist "extremists."

I'd rather that the Qur'an be read than burned, but the murderous rage that the burning of a book has inspired should be illustrative, and should be condemned by Western authorities as the insanity that it is.

"Two Christians killed, churches burned: extremists respond to Florida Koran burning," by Jibran Khan in Asia News, March 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Islamabad (AsiaNews) - Two believers killed, churches attacked, copies of the Bible burned: the Christian community in Pakistan is once again the victim of violence by Islamic fundamentalists, who have targeted places of worship in the country. The extremist violence was triggered by the insane act - repeatedly condemned by Christians in Pakistan and India – of the pastor Wayne Sapp, who last March 20, in Florida burned a Koran under the supervision of the evangelical preacher Terry Jones. The escalating violence has raised alarm over the fate of Asia Bibi, a symbol of the abuses committed in the name of the blasphemy law. The bishop of Islamabad / Rawalpindi defines the US pastor a "fanatic" who encourages followers to a "violent ideology", the consequences of which have an impact "on innocent Christians" across the world.

On March 25, a mob of Islamic extremists attacked a Pentecostal church in Hyderabad, killing two Christians and burning some copies of the Bible. Eyewitnesses said that the fundamentalists stormed the place of worship looking to set it on fire, but a group of believers defended the church. Security forces have fled the scene, leaving those present at the mercy of the crowd. The attackers hurled anti-Christian slogans and a feeling of anger toward the religious minority has spread. in the city The pastor of the church reports that "despite the condemnation of the burning of the Koran" the community "has come under attack because they think that we are linked to the Americans." He emphasizes that "we are Pakistanis, who were born in this land and we do not have any kind of relationship with the United States." "What fault did those two innocent people have – he ends - who were not Americans, but only Pakistani Christians?".

In a second incident, the Full Gospel Assembly Church, in the Badami Bagh area of Lahore, was attacked. Again fundamentalists burned the church, threw copies of the Bible into the street and accused the Christians of blasphemy, claiming they found pieces of the Koran, not far from the church. During the attack some security guards were injured.

Meanwhile, the weekend demonstrations were repeated against the burning of the Koran wanted by Pastor Terry Jones in different cities of Pakistan - among other Peshawar, Lahore and Islamabad. The demonstrators, who burned his picture and chanted slogans and chants against the United States, called for the death of U.S. preacher. Extremists also threatened reprisals and other targeted attacks against Christians, if the U.S. government fails to take action against Pastor Jones....

| 136 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia is nothing in particular, say Islamic apologists in the West, and certainly nothing to be concerned about. One problem with this claim is that wherever we see Sharia put into practice, it has the same character, and it institutionalizes the oppression of women. Sharia Alert from Afghanistan: "Helmand sacking over female singers without headscarves," by Bilal Sarwary for BBC News, March 28 (thanks to Twostellas):

The deputy governor of Helmand province has been sacked for organising a concert that featured female performers without headscarves.

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai took the action against Abdul Satar Mirzakwal after tribal elders complained that it was inappropriate.

The concert attracted about 12,000 people and was hailed as a success by local authorities....

The concert featured two female singers - Farzana Naz and Rita Wagma - who appeared on stage without headscarves.

But officials in the country's Supreme Court said that Mr Karzai took action after hearing complaints from tribal elders.

"Women do not appear in public without wearing a burka and niqab in an Islamic country like Afghanistan," one official, who wished to remain unnamed, said.

"Mirzakwal should have ensured respect for Islamic traditions."...

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I've been traveling so much (gave a seminar to a military group last week, but Hamas-linked CAIR will have to find out which one on its own) that I am a bit late with this, but Raymond Ibrahim's devastating observations on Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Keith Ellison's weepy histrionics at the King hearings have new relevance in light of the Durbin hearings. "Weeping and Other Hysterics: Have Muslim Apologists Nothing More to Offer?," by Raymond Ibrahim in Hudson New York (via RaymondIbrahim.com), March 14:

From Congressman Keith Ellison's emotional breakdown to Congresswoman Jackie Speier's accusations of "racism," last week's hearings on Muslim radicalization have made it clear that those who oppose the hearings have little of substance to offer. Still, the tactics used by such apologists—namely, appeals to emotionalism and accusations of racism—are influential enough that they need to be addressed and discredited once and for all.

For starters, though it would have been unheard of generations ago and seen as a sign of instability, public crying is the latest rage for politicians. A 2007 Associated Press report puts it well: "Tears, once kryptonite to serious presidential candidates, today are more often seen as a useful part of the political tool kit"—and are thus indicative of an increasingly therapeutic society, one more interested in a show of catharsis than facts.

Yet, tears aside, if we wish to be objective for a moment, Ellison's testimony—culminating with his choking up and leaving the hearing—contributes nothing to the topic of Muslim radicalization in America. Instead, it raises more questions about Ellison—a former Nation of Islam leader, mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood front-group CAIR, and critic of the U.S. Constitution.

Indeed, arguing that "suit-and-tie" Islamists have penetrated Western societies and are manipulating the legal system to their advantage—including by imposing aspects of Islamic law, winning special privileges for themselves, and, of course, shutting down criticism of Islam—Daniel Pipes has singled out Ellison as representing a far greater threat to Western civilization than Osama bin Laden.

Did Ellison feign an emotional breakdown during his opening remarks to leave the hearing and evade follow-up questions from Congressman Peter King and others—concrete questions about Muslim radicalization that he preferred not to respond to—or were his tears sincere? Either way, it is not clear which is worse: a dime-a-dozen obfuscating politician, or a politician whose emotions so dominate him that he cannot carry out his responsibilities.

While we are on the topic of strategic-weeping, it is relevant to note that authoritative Muslim scholars, such as Ibn Hajar, recommend deceiving infidels with crocodile tears: "Revealing one thing while secretly planning another is the essence of deception; moreover, the hadith incites [Muslims] to take great caution in war, while [publicly] lamenting and mourning in order to dupe the infidels" (The Al Qaeda Reader, p.142). This is not to conclude that Ellison is taking lessons from Hajar, but that even the most rabid jihadists—not just American politicians—are aware of the power of tears as a ruse....

Read it all.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pamela Geller explains what's wrong with this:

First off, it is not next door. Not nearly. The proposed Anne Frank Museum will be located on 100 Church Street. That is not next door to or near 45 Park Place. Funny how the Islamic supremacists say the Ground Zero mosque is not near Ground Zero, but the Anne Frank museum is next door.

So it is vile for the media (or whoever is behind this bogus meme) to attempt to use the holocaust to advance the Ground Zero mosque, especially since the leader of the Muslim world, Mufti al-Husseini, was an ally of Hitler's and was responsible for the deaths of over 400,000 Jewish women and children during the holocaust. (Scroll and read.) The Muslim world has never apologized for or owned up to their role in World War II. Unlike Germany and Japan, they escaped penalty.

"Imams' girl next door: Anne Frank museum to be GZ mosque neighbor," by Annie Karni in the New York Post, March 27 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

They're strange neighbors.

A museum commemorating the world's most famous Holocaust victim is planning to move across the street from the proposed Ground Zero mosque, The Post has learned.

The nonprofit Anne Frank Center USA, a partner of the Anne Frank Museum in Amsterdam, offers educational programs about the Holocaust and the history of World War II. The group is poised to sign a lease in the 20-floor, glass-and-steel tower at 100 Church St., sources involved in the negotiations confirmed.

The windows of the 1 million- square-foot office tower overlook Park 51, the planned 16-story, 125,000-square-foot Muslim community center and mosque at 45 Park Place, two blocks from Ground Zero.

The museum, which currently rents loft space at 38 Crosby St. in SoHo, took out ads last year seeking a larger home in order to re-create the "secret annex" where the doomed Jewish teen wrote her famous diary while hiding from the Nazis with her family in Amsterdam between 1942 and 1944.

The move would be more evidence that lower Manhattan is becoming a Mecca for religious and cultural groups of all stripes....

How ironic to call a place featuring "religious and cultural groups of all stripes" a "Mecca," since Mecca itself only allows one such group within its confines.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad against infrastructure. "Suicide bombers kill 20 in Afghanistan's southeast," by Elyas Wahdat for Reuters, March 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

KHOST, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Three suicide bombers killed 20 people in an attack on a construction firm in a restive province in southeastern Afghanistan, government officials said on Monday, with the Taliban claiming responsibility for the assault....

The attackers forced their way into the company's compound in the Bermel district of volatile Paktika province on Sunday night after killing a security guard, and then detonated a truck laden with explosives, the Interior Ministry said.

"As a result, 20 employees of the construction company were killed and 50 others were injured," it said in a statement.

Mohebullah Sameem, governor of Paktika, earlier put the death toll from the attack at 13.

He said the dead and wounded included employees of the firm and other civilians. Construction crews and others working on infrastructure projects are frequently targeted by insurgents....

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments by David G. Littman: representative for the World Union for Progressive Judaism at the United Nations in Geneva and statements at the 16 Session of the Council on Human Rights
* * * * *
Follow-up to ‘Martyred Christians of the Middle East’ / Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws (23 March)

Below is WUPJ’s oral statement under items 6; and under 7 (both read for me) and our written statement : A/HRC/16/NGO/134, with fuller details on the unchanged 1968 PLO Charter.

* * * * *

WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM
UN Human Rights Council – 16th Session (28 February-25 March)
Statement by David G. Littman 18 March (pm)
Universal periodic review of countries (item 6)

Thank you, sir. I have been asked to read this statement for Mr. David Littman who is unfortunately indisposed. Mr. President, we are gravely disturbed by the general level of self-satisfaction we see in the UPR process and the partiality shown to dictatorial regimes. We wish to present four disturbing examples from recent UPR reports to highlight grave omissions and to show how political and religious correctness has influenced delegates and the working group.

From the Report on Libya [A/HRC/16/15: 4 January 2011 – and reactions to Libya’s glorified Report] we learn wonders about Qadhafi’s Great Green Book. We read that “Palestine praised the country for the Great Green Document...” The Libyan ‘Presentation’ concludes by affirming that: “Justice was achieved in accordance with divine law and the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya must refer to what was stated in the holy Koran...”

We see that Lebanon’s 2010 Report mentions neither the murder of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, nor Hezbollah, nor suggestions on these matters from delegates.

Egypt’s 2010 Report is equally farcical, especially some comments from Saudi Arabia, the Sudan and other OIC countries. The unstinting praise even includes appreciation for “steps taken to combat female genital mutilation”, which is still above 90% in Egypt; and its “active role in the Human Rights Council” – active, indeed, in consistently trying to prevent some NGOs speaking.

As for human rights education, our written statement gives details on the teaching of Jihad in Egyptian schools, which is even worse in Saudi schools: [E/CN.4/Sub./2004/NGO/27: Jihad and Martyrdom as taught in Egyptian schools]. Iran’s 2010 UPR Report contains no mention of the marriage of 9 year-old girls, and the Iranian delegation rejected 28 entirely reasonable recommendations.

[The words of Shirin Ebadi and Wole Soyinka speaking on the 60th anniversary of the UDHR are a pertinent warning in this UPR context – they denounced all forms of ‘cultural relativism’ and ‘any form of religious human rights declaration’.]

Sir, in light of the appalling travesty of the UPR report on Libya, may we now hope that States and NGO delegates may adopt a more factual & less self-laudatory approach to the UPR process?

Thank you, Sir.

WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM
UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL – 16th session (28 Feb. – 25 March 2011)
Statement by David G. Littman (read for him by an NGO colleague) 21 March (pm)

The PLO Charter still precludes the possibility of a peaceful solution

Thank you, sir. I have been asked to read this statement for Mr David Littman who is unfortunately indisposed.

Sir, Israel is surrounded by states calling for its destruction, which has created a climate of fear for all Israelis.

Despite many calls for the 1968 Fatah Charter to be changed, the main principles remain: (1)

– In the Palestinian state only Jews who lived in Palestine before 1917 will be recognized as citizens [Article 6]:
– Only the Palestinian Arabs possess the right of self-determination, and the entire country belongs to them [Articles 3 and 21].
– Any solution that does not involve total liberation of the country is rejected. This aim cannot be achieved politically; it can only be accomplished militarily [Articles 9 & 21].
– Warfare against Israel is legal, whereas Israel's self-defence is illegal [Article 18]. (2)

All public promises since 1989 to amend the Palestinian National Charter have led nowhere. This was confirmed in 2009 [Fatah’s 6th General Conference] by Central Committee member 'Azzam Al-Ahmad: “The movement's charter remains as it was, without any changes.” (3)

The Palestinian Authority thus still refuses to recognise the historic reality of a “Jewish State of Israel” – even the term ‘Jewish’ – in less than 20% of its ancestral homeland, thereby denying Israel’s international legitimacy for 64 years. (4)

We appeal to the Council to ask why the 1968 PLO Charter calling for the destruction of Israel and the massive exodus of 99% of its Jewish population has still not been amended by the Palestinian Authority, despite official promises to that effect for over 20 years. And we appeal to the Council to examine the 1988 genocidal Hamas Charter, since Hamas is the de-facto government in Gaza. So long as these two Palestinian Charters remain valid – and without any olive branches offered by either side – any peace negotiations, and a two state solution, will remain problematic.

Thank you, sir.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A four-hour-long orgy of victimhood posturing and deflection of attention from jihad terror activity and Islamic supremacism. "500 attend Muslim tolerance luncheon," by Melissa Hayes for The Record, March 28:

When Mohamed Younes selected "Religious Freedom and Tolerance" as the theme for the American Muslim Union's annual brunch, it was long before New York Rep. Peter King decided to hold hearings on "radical Islam."

Younes, president of the union, said the luncheon Sunday at the Glenpointe Marriott in Teaneck came at the right time.

"It just happened to be the right subject for the right moment," he said.

Younes, who founded the Paterson-based grass-roots organization in the hopes of serving the American Muslim community and promoting equality, told the roughly 500 attendees that religious freedom is a constitutional right.

"With the wave of hate speech we hear too much these days, I hope it does not destroy the fabric of our nation and to turn one American against the other," he said. "We need to put the doubt behind us for good in order to participate and to contribute with the well-being of America, our homeland."

See, for Younes, King's hearings were "hate speech," and somehow threatened his religious freedom. This is pure victimhood posturing, as substanceless as it is offensive. Younes, like so many other Muslim leaders and the useful idiot politicians and media figures who carry their water, have essentially nothing to say about Muslims like Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and so many other jihad murderers and would-be murderers. By this talk of tolerance, religious freedom and "hate speech," they are trying to give the impression that for any non-Muslim to be concerned about what is going on in the Muslim community in America because of such people and others like them is bigoted and hateful.

This would be a lot easier to accept if they balanced their cries of victimhood with genuine action against jihadists and Islamic supremacists in their midst; i.e., genuine programs in mosques and Islamic schools teaching against the jihadist understanding of the Qur'an and Sunnah. But there are no such programs, and will not be. But the fact remains: no one is trying to restrict Muslims' religious freedom. No one is promoting hatred of Muslims, except perhaps people like Younes, whose disingenuousness is obvious, and arouses suspicion. People are understandably concerned about jihad terror activity in U.S. mosques. If Younes were to address that in some honest and effective manner, he would win trust. Instead, he only raises suspicions not only about himself, but about the useful idiot politicians and law enforcement officials who attended his event:

Politicians, former judges and state officials including Bergen County Executive Kathleen Donovan, state Sen. Brian Stack, Sen. John Girgenti, U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman, Bergen County Prosecutor John Molinelli, as well as representatives from Homeland Security and the FBI sat alongside community members and religious leaders from various faiths.

Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, jokingly thanked the Muslim community for welcoming a short Jewish woman with open arms.

"It is important for us to grow understanding with one another and to continue the dialogue," she said.

On the theme of religious freedom, Ambassador H.E. Youssef Zada of the Egyptian Consulate noted that during the recent protests in Egypt, it was Christians who guarded the Muslims as they prayed in Tahrir Square.

Somehow I doubt that Ambassador H.E. Youssef Zada mentioned that Christians are routinely victimized in Egypt: that Islamic groups told voters to votes yes on the recently approved Constitutional amendments if they wanted to keep Coptic Christians out of government; or that the government may have joined Islamic supremacist groups in planning the New Year's church bombing that killed 21 people; or that just two weeks ago the army killed nine Christians while firing on a monastery. No, from Christians guarding praying Muslims in Tahrir Square we are supposed to glean some message of religious freedom. For the Christians in Egypt? No, of course not. For the Muslims.

During the four-hour event, many speakers referenced the House Homeland Security Committee hearings earlier this month.

Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-Paterson, said he didn't have a problem with the hearings because he "knew there would be no evidence presented at the hearings that would embarrass anyone in any shape or form from the Muslim community."...

This was because King was cowed into not calling anyone who might have even come close to presenting such evidence.

Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, disagreed with Pascrell's view.

"These hearings are just the most recent example of a troubling pattern of unwarranted scrutiny on American Muslims," she said.

"Unwarranted." One wonders how many jihad terror attacks and plots would have to take place before Jacobs would ever accept any scrutiny of Muslims in the U.S. as "warranted."

Jacobs said that unfortunately in America, the oppressed groups are the ones who must fight to bring about change.

"It falls on you to redefine American Muslims in the eyes of the public," she said.

Indeed. But you aren't going to do it by crying that you're being victimized by legitimate law enforcement concerns about jihad activity. You're only going to do it by working against jihad activity yourselves in a demonstrably honest and genuine manner.

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Secular democracy on the march! Here is another I-Tried-To-Tell-You Alert: "Egyptian Cleric Muhammad Hussein Yaaqub: Results of Egyptian Referendum Were in Favor of Islam, and Whoever Is Unhappy about It Is Free to Leave to Canada or the US," from MEMRITV, March 21 (thanks to John):

Following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Egyptian cleric Muhammad Hussein Yaaaqub, which was posted on the Internet (accessed on March 21, 2011): [...]

Muhaamad Hussein Yaaqub: This was an [Islamic] raid – the raid of the ballot boxes. [...] They have begun saying: "From now on, Islam will enter every aspect of our lives." What is our response to them?

Crowds: Yes, it will.

Muhaamad Hussein Yaaqub: They were the ones who said that it would be decided by the ballot, weren’t they? Isn't that what their democracy is all about? The people said "yes" to Islam, right?

Crowds: Right.

Muhaamad Hussein Yaaqub: The people have said that they want religion, and whoever says he cannot live in such a country anymore is free to go. Go in peace. After all, they have visas for Canada and America. They are free to go.

[..]

Sometimes, when your sheik tells you to vote "Yes," you vote "Yes" – even if it contradicts what you want....

| 47 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 27, 2011

Pakistan's ambassador to the UN condemned "this reprehensible act" as "the work of extremists." He didn't mean, of course, any of the recent jihad attacks or plots. What he had in mind was the burning of the Qur'an in Florida, which, as you can see in this story, the OIC is exploiting to renew its jihad against the freedom of speech in the West. The OIC is bent on compelling Western states to criminalize criticism of Islam, which will criminalize any honest examination of the ways in which jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to recruit for jihad among peaceful Muslims, thus preempting the formulation of any effective strategy to counter that use.

"OIC to ‘send’ strong condemnation," from the Daily Mail (Pakistan), March 27:

NEW YORK – Reposing complete confidence in Ambassador Abdullah Hussain Haroon, Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations, the OIC decided that the Ambassador of Pakistan along with Ambassadors of Tajiskistan (OIC chair), Morocco (OIC Coordinator for Human Rights), Iran and Egypt would meet with the UN Secretary General to convey OIC’s strong condemnation and ask him to take the lead towards promoting inter-faith harmony.

It was decided in OIC ambassadorial meeting which convened here the other day to discuss the recent desecration of the Holy Quran in Florida last week.

The meeting approved the proposals of Ambassador Haroon and his Iranian counterpart that OIC Chair and Observer Mission will draft a strong condemnatory letter on behalf of OIC with the assistance of Pakistan and Morocco to be sent to the UN Secretary General, President UN General Assembly, High Commissioner for Human Rights (HCHR) with the request to circulate it as an official document....

Reiterating the President of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari's clear expression of sentiments of the people and extreme provocation and seriousness of the issue, and his call to the United Nations to take immediate action on the subject, Ambassador Haroon the first Speaker from the member states voiced strong condemnation of this sacrilegious act.

He assured that Pakistan would continue playing its active and constructive role in promoting inter-faith harmony and peaceful co-existence.

On March 22, Ambassador Haroon had written a letter to the UN Secretary General, where he drawn UN attention towards this despicable act of desecration of the Holy Quran by Wayne Sapp and Terry Jones in Florida.

He voiced Pakistan's profound regret and deep concern at the increasing acts of "Islamophobia and growing trend of intolerance and hatred towards Muslims as well as insults to their religious symbols and personalities".

The letter further said, "While this reprehensible act is the work of extremists and is evidently designed to provoke dissent and discord among communities and peoples across the world, such sacrilegious acts also go against the very concept of inter-faith harmony and threaten the multicultural fabric of the societies and the brotherhood of the United Nations".

The Ambassador urged the United Nations to play its important role in ensuring peace and harmony among peoples of the world. He said Pakistan has full confidence in the UN's leadership and hoped that it would take all steps to fight such tendencies and promote intercultural and inter-faith harmony that is basic to coexistence of mankind.

Recalling Pakistan’s initiative on Interfaith Dialogue and participation in the Alliance of Civilization, Ambassador Haroon stated that Pakistan has always stood for promoting peace and harmony among people and nations of the world.

He regretted that while OIC has always supported peace initiatives in all regions of the world including tolerant and constructive engagement during last year’s Islamophobic incidents i.e. threats to burn the Quran and opposition to construction of Islamic Center in New York, attacks on Islam, its symbols and holy personalities continue unabated.

The Ambassador proposed that the OIC group should write a letter to the UN Secretary General (UNSG) asking him to issue a strong condemnatory statement and take concrete action to protect multiculturalism and promote peace and harmony in the world....

| 63 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

CNN allows a rare voice of common sense to break through amid its recent barrage of Islamic victimhood posturing stories and Islamic supremacist propaganda. "Don't overstate anti-Muslim bias," by William J. Bennett and Seth Leibsohn for CNN, March 26 (thanks to AINA):

(CNN) -- Almost two weeks after the House Homeland Security Committee hearing on radicalization in the Muslim community in America, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin has announced he will hold a hearing in the Senate. But, rather than focus on the problem of radicalization in the Muslim community, Durbin's panel will be directed to another subject: anti-Muslim bigotry in the United States.

Senator Durbin has said anti-Islamic sentiment in America is on the rise and that, "It is important for our generation to renew our founding charter's commitment to religious diversity and to protect the liberties guaranteed by our Bill of Rights." The hearing, scheduled for next week, follows a CNN special to air this Sunday, "Unwelcome: The Muslims Next Door." [...]

Despite what may have gone on in Murfreesboro with the mosque its adherents have wanted to build, the larger story of anti-Islamic bias in America does not hold water.

Let's start with the national numbers: 8.4 percent of religious hate crimes in America were anti-Muslim in 2009 (the most recent date for which statistics are available). By contrast, that same year, nearly 72 percent of religious hate crimes in America were anti-Jewish (Muslims in America faced 107 incidents of bias in 2009; Jews faced 931).

This pattern has remained fairly consistent over the past decade. For example, in 2002, 10.5 percent of the religious bias crimes in America were anti-Muslim while 65% were anti-Jewish; in 2006 (just to pick another post- 9/11/2001 year), 11.9 percent of the religious bias crimes in America were anti-Muslim while 65.4 percent were anti-Jewish. (It is worth noting here that exact statistics on the Muslim population in America are hard to assess -- estimates range from 2.6 million to 7 million, a number President Obama cited -- the Jewish population is generally agreed upon at about 6.5 million). [...]

So what is that larger story? Bigotry is, of course, abhorrent. But given that America has been targeted by a great deal of terrorism in the name of Islam over the past decade -- targeted by terrorists who say they are acting in the name of Islam -- America has not over-reacted in a wave of anti-Muslim bigotry.

Whatever may be the case in Murfreesboro, notice the rest of the story out of Tennessee: Muslim leaders in cities from Chattanooga to Knoxville to Memphis say they have "experienced no hostility."...

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Afghan doughnut shops decimated. "Taliban militants abduct 50 policemen in Afghanistan," from Reuters, March 27 (thanks to Ima):

ASADABAD, Afghanistan (Reuters) – Taliban insurgents abducted around 50 off-duty Afghan policemen in an ambush in a volatile province in northeastern Afghanistan, the militant group and provincial officials said on Sunday....

The policemen were abducted by militants in the Chapa Dara district of remote northeastern Kunar province after returning from neighboring Nuristan province where they had traveled to collect their salaries, Nuristan governor Jamaluddin Badr said.

"The policemen were in civilian clothes and had no weapons with them," Badr told Reuters from Nuristan.

Mohammad Farooq, a senior police officer in Nuristan, confirmed around 50 policemen had been kidnapped by insurgents.

In an email statement sent to media, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said the Islamist group was holding 50 policemen and the group's military council for the area would decide their fate.

Kunar and Nuristan are remote and mountainous provinces that share a porous border with lawless areas of neighboring Pakistan, where insurgents are said to have safe havens from which they launch attacks into Afghanistan....

More indication of the reliable anti-terror aid we have bought with all those billions we've given to Pakistan.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I am writing this in an airport lounge somewhere in the United States, and Fareed Zakaria is on CNN explaining it all for us at high volume on the TV overhead. I was doing my best not to pay attention, but I just heard him say, in a piece asserting that al-Qaeda's influence is waning in the Islamic world, that the recent uprisings all over the Middle East show that Muslims there "want modernity, jobs and democracy more than they want an Islamic caliphate."

I'm not really surprised that the mainstream media is still peddling such corrosive drivel, but Zakaria might have been kind enough to take even cursory notice of recent stories such as these:

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

Muslim Brotherhood rising in Libya, envisions government on "Qur'anic principles"

Muslim Brotherhood takes leading role in post-Mubarak Egypt

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Terry Jones is neither a priest nor a Catholic, but the Islamic Republic's Ahlul Bayt News Agency cannot be expected to have mastered the intricacies of Christian sectarianism. But note in any case that we have never seen such outrage and indignation from Islamic ambassadors or any other Muslims regarding any of the jihad terror attacks and plots against non-Muslims in the U.S. or Europe. These so-called "hijackings" of their peaceful faith never seem to move them to this kind of outrage. Note also that the ambassadors are trying to use this incident to attempt yet again to restrict the West's freedom of speech regarding Islam, jihad and Islamic supremacism.

"Islamic countries ambassadors to Vatican condemn insult to Holy Quran," from the Ahlul Bayt News Agency, March 26 (thanks to Tom):

Islamic countries ambassadors to Vatican in a statement condemned insult to Holy Quran by an American priest.

In a joint statement, the ambassadors condemned insult to the holy book and called the action disgusting.

Iran's ambassador to Vatican, in a letter to foreign minister of Vatican, by expressing deep sorrow over such indecent act, called for immediate action in taking stance and condemning the measure by Vatican.

An American priest, in a disgusting act, put Holy Quran on trial in a church in southeastern state of Florida, USA, and then burned it as, he declared, an element of killing and terror.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The mask drops yet again, but no one in the West will particularly notice or care, as always. "Abbas adds a new condition for "peace": Release all terrorists!," from Elder of Ziyon, March 26 (thanks to Inexion):

Mahmoud Abbas, that intransigent leader that the world considers "moderate," had added another condition for "peace" with Israel:

Abbas now demands that Israel release every single Palestinian Arab prisoner.

This includes, of course, the most heinous terrorists - those that have murdered and slaughtered Israelis - that have been captured by Israel. Abbas is not distinguishing between prisoners with "blood on their hands" and those who merely planned or facilitated terror attacks.

Abbas is saying that peace depends on Israel releasing murderers. Not only that, he is implicitly threatening to support terrorism against Israel until every last of those prisoners are released.

Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Secular, pro-democracy forces nowhere in evidence, but no doubt -- if we are to believe the learned analysts -- certain to triumph. "Islamists Clash With Security Forces In South Yemen," from AGI, March 27 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

(AGI) Sanaa - There have been clashes between Islamist groups and Yemeni security forces attempting to regain control of buildings occupied by militias in Jaar, in the southern province of Abyan. According to witnesses, a soldier was killed during an attack. Yesterday, key buildings in the city were attacked and occupied by a coalition of Islamist groups. Faced with weeks of protests Yemen's president Ali Abdullah Saleh has reiterated in an interview with Al-Aribya that he does not intend to "remain attached to power", and launched an appeal to avoid the country falling into a civil war.
| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Stop Al Jazeera’s expansion in the United States" in the Daily Caller, March 26, Pamela Geller explains why al-Jazeera should not be allowed an expanded presence on American airwaves:

Al Jazeera is planning to expand into the United States, and the chattering classes are treating it as a simple free speech matter. Let’s not let the Islamic supremacists once again invoke the freedom of speech to kill our freedom of speech. The ruse of using freedom of speech to allow propaganda broadcasts over our airways is another stealth attack on the United States of America. The issue of the expansion of Al Jazeera into the United States can only be likened to an expansion of Goebbels’s media network into the U.S. at the height of World War II.

Remember: the Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, was aligned with Hitler and lived in the lap of luxury on Hitler’s dime during the height of World War II, while he made weekly addresses to the umma and all the Axis countries, spewing the most vile incitement to slaughter Jews, quoting Muhammad, shrieking Qur’an verses, demanding the rout of British and American forces. These “holy” speeches whose content came directly from the Qur’an incited violence across the Axis world and helped al-Husseini raise Muslim armies in Bosnia. Al-Husseini’s actions resulted in the deaths of 400,000 Jewish women and children. Would you have the likes of al-Husseini go up against Katie Couric?

Because this is what we are suggesting. The overtly covert — or is that covertly overt? — propaganda war against the West is being waged on all fronts, but no organization has done as much to spread hate, lies and incitement to violence as Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera is the leading terrorist propaganda organization in the world. Jihad murder mastermind Anwar al-Awlaki has praised Al Jazeera, and several years ago one of its most prominent reporters was arrested on terror charges. Al Jazeera also has for years been the recipient of numerous Al Qaeda videos featuring bin Laden, Zawahiri, and American traitor Adam Gadahn. Yet they never seem to be able to trace where these videos are coming from. They have repeatedly been set up at the point of attack right before a bomb went off, so that they could take the picture of the slaughtered, dismembered bodies.

How did they know? Who was their Roger Ailes? A Ouija board? They don’t report news. They spread poison. They are no different from Al Manar, the “broadcast” station for Hezbollah. And Al Manar is designated a terrorist organization by the State Department. And yet freedom-loving people have to listen to the Katie Courics and the Matt Lauers and all the other schmucks in the mainstream media laud the coverage of Al Jazeera, while slamming and smearing Fox News. [...]

This cannot stand. Look at your calendars and join me April 1 in Washington, D.C. at the National Press Club: Cliff Kincaid, the president of America’s Survival, Inc., has put together an explosive event that you cannot afford to miss: “Al Jazeera, Global Jihad, and the Suicide of the West.” I’ll be speaking, along with Kincaid, news analyst Charles K. Ortel, independent television producer Jerry Kenney, and investigative journalist Lee Kaplan.

Do not accept the Goebbels network of the Fourth Reich. Join me in fighting this scourge.

Read it all.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Assad too will discover the appeasement only emboldens those who see the world only in terms of strength and weakness. "Mourners burn building in Syria," from Reuters, March 27:

DAMASCUS - Thousands of mourners at a funeral for a Syrian killed in anti-government protests burned a ruling Baath party building and a police station on Saturday as authorities freed 260 prisoners in a bid to placate reformists.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was facing the deepest crisis of his 11 years in power after security forces fired on protesters on Friday in the city of Deraa, adding to a death toll that rights groups have said now numbers in the dozens.

Hundreds gathered in the southern city’s main square on Saturday chanting for freedom. Three young men climbed on the rubble of a statue of late President Hafez al-Assad which protesters had pulled down on Friday in a scene that recalled the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue in Iraq in 2003 by U.S. troops.

The men had cardboard signs reading “the people want the downfall of the regime”, a witness said.

In nearby Tafas, mourners in the funeral procession of Kamal Baradan, who was killed on Friday in Deraa, set fire to the Baath party building and the police station, residents said.

A human rights lawyer said that 260 prisoners, mostly Islamists, were freed after completing at least three-quarters of their sentences. Protesters have been demanding the freeing of political prisoners and the lifting of emergency law....

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 26, 2011

The hudna is never intended to last, and can be called only when it is in the jihadists' interest to take a break, regroup, and re-arm. "Gaza militant groups agree Israel ceasefire, says Hamas," from BBC News, March 26:

Militant groups in Gaza say they will agree to a ceasefire if Israel stops attacks on the Palestinian territory.
The move was announced by the Hamas group that runs Gaza following a meeting between its leaders and insurgent groups.
In the past week at least 10 Palestinians, including several civilians and children, have been killed by Israeli attacks.

Never mind Hamas' track record of actively positioning their military assets to put civilians in harm's way for propaganda purposes. They are also known to inflate civilian casualties, all the more to downplay their losses of jihadist personnel.

In the same period, militants have fired 80 rockets and mortar shells.
BBC Gaza correspondent Jon Donnison says the past week has seen some of the most serious violence in and around Gaza since the end of Operation Cast Lead - Israel's major offensive here more than two years ago.
But in a statement released after a meeting with all militant groups in Gaza, Hamas said the insurgents were "committed to calm as long as the occupation (Israel) commits to it".
Khader Habib, an Islamic Jihad leader, told Agence France-Presse that "everybody confirmed that they respect the national consensus by calming things with the Zionist enemy".
He added that the truce depended "on the nature of Israeli behaviour, and we insist on the need to respond immediately to each escalation by the occupiers"....
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No one supports actual religious discrimination, but the OIC is dedicated to quashing all honest discussion of jihad and Islamic supremacism under this rubric. Hence their happy reaction to this resolution. More on this story. "OIC commends resolution on religious discrimination," from Arab News, March 26:

JEDDAH: The UN Human Rights Council unanimously adopted a new resolution on the elimination of forms of discrimination and violence based on religious beliefs.

The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents the Islamic group at the council participated in the March 24 discussion. The United States and the European Union too were represented.

Informed sources in the OIC General Secretariat here said that the new resolution related to combating religious intolerance and negative stereotypes, stigmatization, discrimination, and incitement to violence, and violence against individuals based on religion and belief is not a substitute for an earlier resolution adopted by the UN on combating defamation of religions, which the Human Rights Council had adopted many times in the past several years.

The sources stated that the new resolution is a qualitative breakthrough because it was adopted unanimously, adding, it gives the widest margin of freedom of expression, with the rejection of discrimination and incitement and stereotypes used by the other or against the symbols of the followers of religions.

The sources emphasized that the OIC approved the new resolution from a position of strength, particularly after the adoption of the Human Rights Council resolution on defamation of religions over the past four years with a clear majority.

However, the sources stressed that the issue of acceptance of the new resolution comes as a goodwill gesture by the organization in order to reach the necessary consensus, bridge the gap, and partner with the West in addressing the anti-Islam sentiments that prevailed in some Western communities toward Muslims.

There is no discussion in this context of Islamic jihad terrorism and supremacism as having something to do with the alleged "anti-Islam sentiment" in "some Western communities." That connection is precisely what the OIC is trying to obscure.

The new resolution came after the OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu proposed last year, a number of proposals on the possibility of reaching a common ground toward a solid platform for its adoption.

According to informed sources, the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had invited the OIC to lead, along with both Washington and the European Union, the efforts to draft a new resolution to ensure the foundations adopted by the previous resolution, giving a wider margin of freedom of expression.

The sources confirmed at the same time that the decision regarding defamation of religions has not been abandoned.

This is the most contentious of the resolutions, because in countries with strong protections on speech and other forms of expression, the idea that a religion can have the same defamation protections as living individuals is considered an affront to individual rights.

But the OIC is dedicated to overcoming that obstacle.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Apologists for Fethullah Gulen such as Mustafa Akyol insist that the Gulen movement is benign. But the contrary evidence continues to mount.

Islamization of Turkey Update: "Manuscript raid in Turkey draws international criticism," by Sera De Vor for Hürriyet Daily News, March 25 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

ANKARA - International and domestic press organizations condemned Friday recent police raids in Turkey targeting the manuscripts of an unpublished book, incidents that Turkish organizations described as “censorship.”

“Preventing a published book from being distributed is one thing, but forbidding the very possession of a draft book that has not been published sets a very dangerous precedent,” Johann Bihr from Reporters Without Borders told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

A week after Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said the issue of press freedom in Turkey was being blown out of proportion, Istanbul police raided a printing house and a daily newspaper in search of an unpublished book, confiscating print copies and destroying all digital traces of the manuscript.

The book in question is by jailed journalist Ahmet Şık and deals with the alleged organization founded within the Turkish police by the Fethullah Gülen Islamic community.

Reporters Without Borders is “really astonished” by the police confiscation of Şık’s manuscript, Bihr said.

“Whatever its content, Şık’s draft book represents a piece of work by a writer and journalist, not a weapon or drugs. Seizing all private copies of it and threatening those who don’t hand it over with prosecution is in complete contradiction with the principle of freedom of expression,” he said.

“Reporters Without Borders is really worried by these searches and the associated threats, which unfortunately take the Turkish judiciary one more step away from European and international standards,” Bihr added....

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a glimpse into the reality behind the benign picture of Sharia that Islamic spokesmen in the West are busy painting now as more and more states consider anti-Sharia laws. "Muslims Attack Christian in Egypt, Cut Off His Ear," by Mary Abdelmassih for AINA, March 26:

(AINA) -- A group of Muslims attacked Ayman Anwar Mitri, a 45 year old Christian Coptic man in the Upper Egyptian town of Qena, cutting off his ear. The Muslims claimed they were applying Sharia law because Mr. Mitri allegedly had an illicit affair with a Muslim woman. The Muslims called the police and told them "We have applied the law of Allah, now come and apply your law," according to Mr. Mitri in an interview for the Egyptian Human Rights Organization.

Mr. Mitri, a low grade administrator at a secondary school, from elHasweya, in Qena, 492 KM from Cairo, had rented his flat to two Muslim sisters, Abeer and Sabrin Saif Al-Nasr, through an agent. After nine months he learned the sisters had been indicted for prostitution, so he asked them to leave and they did.

On Sunday, March 20 Mr. Mitri was informed by a friend via a phone call at 4 AM that the flat where the Muslim sisters lived was on fire; he went to the flat. While waiting in the torched flat a Muslim named Alaa el Sunni came and berated him for renting his flat to prostitutes. "I tried to calm him down," said Mr. Mitri, "and told him I knew nothing about the two women since they came through an agent." Alaa suggested they would go somewhere quiet to clear the misunderstanding. They went to the flat of Mr. Mitri's friend Khaled, a policeman, where 12 Muslims were waiting for him. They started beating him and saying "We will teach you a lesson, Christian" and "This serves your right for renting your property to prostitutes."

Believing this was the end of the episode, they asked him to call the Muslim woman, so that they would send her to her father. When the woman refused to come, they asked a female Muslim neighbor to call her, saying that her belongings are with her. The woman, Sabrin, came and was told to say that she had a relationship with Mr. Mitri. "At first the woman refused, but after being beaten, she agreed," said Mr. Mitri.

Remembering his ordeal, he said that they sat him on a chair and a Muslim named elHusseiny cut his right ear off. "I felt so shocked that I do not even know what tool he used." They also made a a 10cm cut at the back of his neck, cut his other ear, his face and his arm (video showing wounds). Mr. Mitri said they wanted to throw him off the fifth floor but Khaled objected, saying he would get into trouble for just being there, since he is a policeman.

Mr. Mitri said that the Muslims tried to convert him to Islam, but he refused. The Muslims then called the police and told them to come and get the Copt saying "We have applied the law of Allah, now come and apply your civil law."...

At first Mr. Mitri said he wanted full compensation for his losses and even wanted revenge by cutting off the ear of the Muslim who cut his ear off. However, it was reported that a "reconciliation" meeting was made in the presence of Colonel Ahmed Masood, Vice military ruler of Qena, whereby Ayman Mitri and the Muslims came to an "agreement." Mr. Mitri had to withdraw the police report he filed against the Muslims....

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Geert Wilders's speech at the Annual Lecture at the Magna Carta Foundation in Rome on March 25:

Signore e signori, ladies and gentlemen, dear friends of the Magna Carta Foundation, molte grazie. Thank you for inviting me to Rome. It is great to be here in this beautiful city which for many centuries was the capital and the centre of Europe’s Judeo-Christian culture.

Together with Jerusalem and Athens, Rome is the cradle of our Western civilization – the most advanced and superior civilization the world has ever known.

As Westerners, we share the same Judeo-Christian culture. I am from the Netherlands and you are from Italy. Our national cultures are branches of the same tree. We do not belong to multiple cultures, but to different branches of one single culture. This is why when we come to Rome, we all come home in a sense. We belong here, as we also belong in Athens and in Jerusalem.

It is important that we know where our roots are. If we lose them we become deracinated. We become men and women without a culture.

I am here today to talk about multiculturalism. This term has a number of different meanings. I use the term to refer to a specific political ideology. It advocates that all cultures are equal. If they are equal it follows that the state is not allowed to promote any specific cultural values as central and dominant. In other words: multiculturalism holds that the state should not promote a leitkultur, which immigrants have to accept if they want to live in our midst.

It is this ideology of cultural relativism which the German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently referred to when she said that multiculturalism has proved “an absolute failure.”
My friends, I dare say that we have known this all along. Indeed, the premise of the multiculturalist ideology is wrong. Cultures are not equal. They are different, because their roots are different. That is why the multiculturalists try to destroy our roots.

Rome is a very appropriate place to address these issues. There is an old saying which people of our Western culture are all familiar with. “When in Rome, do as the Romans do,” it says. This is an obvious truth: If you move somewhere, you must adapt to the laws and customs of the land.

The multicultural society has undermined this rule of common sense and decency. The multicultural society tells the newcomers who settle in our cities and villages: You are free to behave contrary to our norms and values. Because your norms and values are just as good, perhaps even better, than ours.

It is, indeed, appropriate to discuss these matters here in Rome, because the history of Rome also serves as a warning.

Will Durant, the famous 20th century American historian, wrote that “A great civilization cannot be destroyed from outside if it has not already destroyed itself from within.” This is exactly what happened here, in Rome, 16 centuries ago.

In the 5th century, the Roman Empire fell to the Germanic Barbarians. There is no doubt that the Roman civilization was far superior to that of the Barbarians. And yet, Rome fell. Rome fell because it had suffered a loss of belief in its own civilization. It had lost the will to stand up and fight for survival.

Rome did not fall overnight. Rome fell gradually. The Romans scarcely noticed what was happening. They did not perceive the immigration of the Barbarians as a threat until it was too late. For decades, Germanic Barbarians, attracted by the prosperity of the Empire, had been crossing the border.

At first, the attraction of the Empire on newcomers could be seen as a sign of the cultural, political and economic superiority of Rome. People came to find a better life which their own culture could not provide. But then, on December 31st in the year 406, the Rhine froze and tens of thousands of Germanic Barbarians, crossed the river, flooded the Empire and went on a rampage, destroying every city they passed. In 410, Rome was sacked.

The fall of Rome was a traumatic experience. Numerous books have been written about the cataclysmal event and Europeans were warned not to make the same mistake again. In 1899, in his book ‘The River War,’ Winston Churchill warned that Islam is threatening Europe in the same way as the Barbarians once threatened Rome. “Mohammedanism,” Churchill wrote – I quote – “is a militant and proselytizing faith. No stronger retrograde force exists in the World. […] The civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.” End of quote.

Churchill is right. However, if Europe falls, it will fall because, like ancient Rome, it no longer believes in the superiority of its own civilization. It will fall because it foolishly believes that all cultures are equal and that, consequently, there is no reason why we should fight for our own culture in order to preserve it.

This failure to defend our own culture has turned immigration into the most dangerous threat that can be used against the West. Multiculturalism has made us so tolerant that we tolerate the intolerant.

Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake: Our opponents are keenly aware of our weakness. They realize that the pattern which led to the fall of Rome, is at play today in the West. They are keenly aware of the importance of Rome as a symbol of the West. Over and over again they hint at the fall of Rome. Rome is constantly on their minds.

• The former Turkish Prime Minister Erbakan said – I quote: “The whole of Europe will become Islamic. We will conquer Rome”.
• Yunis al-Astal, a Hamas cleric and member of the Palestinian Parliament said – I quote: “Very soon Rome will be conquered.”
• Ali Al-Faqir, the former Jordanian Minister of Religion, stated that – I quote: “Islam will conquer Rome.”
• Sheikh Muhammad al-Arifi, imam of the mosque of the Saudi Defence Academy, said – I quote: “We will control Rome and introduce Islam in it.”
Our opponents are hoping for an event that is akin to the freezing of the Rhine in 406, when thousands of immigrants will be given an easy opportunity to cross massively into the West.
• In a 1974 speech to the UN, the Algerian President Houari Boumédienne, said – I quote: “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” End of quote.
• Libyan dictator Kadhafi said, I quote: “There are tens of millions of Muslims in the European continent today and their number is on the increase. This is the clear indication that the European continent will be converted into Islam. Europe will one day soon be a Muslim continent.” End of quote.

Our opponents are aiming for a repetition of the fall of Rome in the 5th century and want to use exactly the same methods. “The strategy of exporting human beings and having them breed in abundance is the simplest way to take possession of a territory,” warned the famous Italian author Oriana Fallaci.

However, the situation today could be worse than it was when the Roman Empire fell. The Germanic Barbarians who overran Rome were not driven by an ideology. After having sacked Rome, they eventually adopted the Judeo-Christian civilization of Rome. They destroyed Rome because they wanted its riches, but they realized and recognized that Roman civilization was superior to their own Barbaric culture.

Having destroyed Rome, the Germanic tribes eventually tried to rebuild it. In 800, the Frankish leader Charlemagne had himself crowned Roman Emperor. Three hundred years later, the Franks and the other Europeans would go on the Crusades in defence of their Christian culture. The Crusades were as Oriana Fallaci wrote – I quote – a “counter-offensive designed to stem Islamic expansionism in Europe.” Rome had fallen, but like a phoenix it had risen again.

Contrary to the Barbarians which confronted Rome, the followers of Muhammad are driven by an ideology which they want to impose on us.

Islam is a totalitarian ideology. Islamic Shariah law supervises every detail of life. Islam is not compatible with our Western way of life. Islam is a threat to our values. Respect for people who think otherwise, the equality of men and women, the equality of homosexuals and heterosexuals, respect for Christians, Jews, unbelievers and apostates, the separation of church and state, freedom of speech, they are all under pressure because of islamization.

Europe is islamizing at a rapid pace. Many European cities have large islamic concentrations. In some neighbourhoods, Islamic regulations are already being enforced. Women’s rights are being trampled. We are confronted with headscarves and burqa’s, polygamy, female genital mutilation, honour-killings. “In each one of our cities” says Oriana Fallaci, “there is a second city, a state within the state, a government within the government. A Muslim city, a city ruled by the Koran.” – End of quote.

Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake: The multiculturalist Left is facilitating islamization. Leftist multiculturalists are cheering for every new shariah bank, for every new islamic school, for every new mosque. Multiculturalists consider Islam as being equal to our own culture. Shariah law or democracy? Islam or freedom? It doesn’t really matter to them. But it does matter to us. The entire leftist elite is guilty of practising cultural relativism. Universities, churches, trade unions, the media, politicians. They are all betraying our hard-won liberties.

Ladies and gentlemen, what is happening in Europe today has to some extent been deliberately planned.

In October 2009, Andrew Neather, the former advisor of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, confirmed that the British Government had deliberately organized mass immigration as part of a social engineering project. The Blair Government wanted to – I quote – “make the UK truly multicultural.” To achieve this end, 2.3 million foreigners were allowed to enter Britain between 2000 and 2009. Neather says this policy has “enriched” Britain.

| 73 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Indeed. They are so hell-bent on "building bridges," as if that would fix everything, that they prostrate themselves to cover up the chasm between Western standards of human rights and acceptable behavior, and those of Sharia. They expect us to do the same. "Newt Gingrich: President Obama won't confront radical Islam," by Kendra Marr for Politico, March 25 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Newt Gingrich on Friday blasted the Obama administration for what he labels a refusal to confront radical Islam.
“Until you replace this president and until you have the Congress and the new president replace large parts of our bureaucracies, we’re going to continue to be dominated by a secular, anti-Christian and anti-Jewish elite, which is seeking to impose on us rules that make zero sense,” he told religious conservatives at the American Family Association’s pastors’ policy briefing in Iowa.
Gingrich, answering a question about challenging Sharia law on U.S. soil, said the country’s leadership was “so afraid to tell the truth” and “timid” that it didn’t swiftly prosecute the Pakistani immigrant who was sentenced to life in prison last year for planting a bomb in Times Square. And he pointed out that the federal government has sued a school district for denying a Muslim middle school teacher unpaid leave to make a pilgrimage to Mecca.
“I simply suggest that every church in the country announce there is a new principle that visiting Bethlehem every year for three weeks is an important part of your devotion,” he said to applause.

Or Key West. Have yourself a Parrot-Head pilgrimage.

“The whole thing collapses,” he added. “It’s an absurdity. It’s part of this desperation of our secular elites to do everything they can to prove they are not anti-Muslim.”
Gingrich insisted that he’s not anti-Muslim himself, but that he is “deeply opposed” to the religion’s radical wing that represses women, homosexuals and Christians.
“I think it’s time to have the courage to stand up and say that we represent an insistence on modernity,” he said. “And we represent a decisive opposition to those who would kill us for the purpose of imposing our beliefs on the rest of us. And we are prepared to say an act of terrorism is an act of jihadism.”
| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

For now. We will see this business again when they think they have an opening and the time is right. At the moment, they may have decided they have bigger fish to fry, with opportunities emerging to install Islamic regimes in multiple countries (under the pretense of democracy). They will also try to leverage that situation with regard to Israel, as we have already seen renewed attacks on Israel aimed at drawing it into a conflict for which it will then be roundly condemned in the Wide World of Useful Idiots, who will appeal, of course, to the U.N.

And for that matter, Islamic groups need at this moment to be able to appeal to concepts like freedom of speech to advance their agenda across North Africa, Yemen, and beyond. Making a fuss over insults right now might look a bit funny.

Even so, they have left themselves a loophole: "However, diplomats from Islamic countries have warned the council that they could return to campaigning for an international law against religious defamation if Western countries are not seen as acting to protect believers."

And you know which "believers" they mean. "Islamic bloc drops U.N. drive on defaming religion," by Robert Evans for Reuters, March 25 (thanks to Alexandre):

(Reuters) - Islamic countries set aside their 12-year campaign to have religions protected from "defamation", allowing the U.N. Human Rights Council to approve a plan to promote religious tolerance on Thursday.
Western countries and their Latin American allies, strong opponents of the defamation concept, joined Muslim and African states in backing without vote the new approach that switches focus from protecting beliefs to protecting believers.

No one wants to name names, as with the EU's document of "stuttering timidity" against the persecution of Christians by Muslims.

According to a report by the British Catholic group Aid to the Church in Need, 75% of religious persecution in the world is committed against Christians. And the report shows how much of that is Muslim persecution of Christians, just over a span of two years. But because protecting Christians does not make for a hip, fashionable cause, the world yawns.

Since 1998, the 57-nation Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) had won majority approval in the council and at the United Nations General Assembly for a series of resolutions on "combating defamation of religion".
Critics said the concept ran against international law and free speech, and left the way open for tough "blasphemy" laws like those in Pakistan which have been invoked this year by the killers of two moderate politicians in Pakistan.
They argued that it also allowed states where one religion predominates to keep religious minorities under tight control or even leave them open to forced conversion or oppression.
But Pakistan, which speaks for the OIC in the rights council, had argued that such protection against defamation was essential to defend Islam, and other religions, against criticism that caused offence to ordinary believers.

Note the perfunctory mention of "other religions." But, no thanks, some of us have thicker skin than that.

Islamic countries pointed to the publication of cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed in Denmark in 2005, which sparked anti-Western violence in the Middle East and Asia, as examples of defamatory treatment of their faith that they wanted stopped.

Whose prophet? Partial credit for the lower-case "prophet," at least.

However, support for the fiercely-contested resolutions -- which the OIC had been seeking to have transformed into official U.N. human rights standards -- has declined in recent years.
The new three-page resolution, which emerged after discussions between U.S. and Pakistani diplomats in recent weeks, recognises that there is "intolerance, discrimination and violence" aimed at believers in all regions of the world.
Omitting any reference to "defamation", it condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that amounts to incitement to hostility or violence against believers and calls on governments to act to prevent it.

That will be in the eye of the beholder, and can still potentially cause problems.

The U.S.-based Human Rights First campaign group said the new resolution was "a huge achievement because...it focuses on the protection of individuals rather than religions" and put the divisive debates on defamation behind.
However, diplomats from Islamic countries have warned the council that they could return to campaigning for an international law against religious defamation if Western countries are not seen as acting to protect believers.
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 25, 2011

I tried to tell you. "Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links," by Praveen Swami, Nick Squires and Duncan Gardham in the Telegraph, March 25 (thanks to Jonathan):

Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited "around 25" men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are "today are on the front lines in Adjabiya".

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters "are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists," but added that the "members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader".

His revelations came even as Idriss Deby Itno, Chad's president, said al-Qaeda had managed to pillage military arsenals in the Libyan rebel zone and acquired arms, "including surface-to-air missiles, which were then smuggled into their sanctuaries".

Mr al-Hasidi admitted he had earlier fought against "the foreign invasion" in Afghanistan, before being "captured in 2002 in Peshwar, in Pakistan". He was later handed over to the US, and then held in Libya before being released in 2008.

US and British government sources said Mr al-Hasidi was a member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG, which killed dozens of Libyan troops in guerrilla attacks around Derna and Benghazi in 1995 and 1996....

| 39 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A "lucrative and active human smuggling ring." "Prosecutors: Somali Smuggled Jihadists into U.S.," from IPT News, March 25:

A lucrative and active human smuggling ring brought an undetermined number of potential Somali jihadists into the United States through Brazil, federal prosecutors say in court papers.

Those prosecutors are asking a federal judge in San Antonio to give the maximum sentence to a Somali man who pleaded guilty in November to two counts of making false statements on a 2008 asylum application. Ahmed Muhammed Dhakane failed to report his connections to Al-Ittihad Al-Islami (AIAI) and al-Barakat, both specially designated terrorist organizations.

When he is sentenced April 28, prosecutors want U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez to factor in a series of related and disturbing actions spelled out in this memorandum, including the human smuggling of potential terrorists. They intend to call several law enforcement witnesses and three people Dhakane smuggled into the country.

The smuggling was run through Brazil, aided by bribes paid to immigration authorities there, from June 2006 through March 2008. Dhakane instructed those he smuggled on how to make false asylum claims....

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But they meant "peace and tranquility," doncha know. "Islamic Clerics Call Kurdish Protestors to 'Jihad' Against Their Leaders," by Wladimir Van Wilgenburg in Rudaw, March 25:

The city of Sulaimani is known for its secular image in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, but now young religious clerics are taking a central role in the ongoing anti-government demonstrations there by leading the protest’s Friday prayer sessions and speaking out against governmental corruption.

“We are especially inspired by the events in the Middle East and Egypt,” said Mullah Mohammed Nasrullah, one of the first clerics to lead the public prayers that have become a focal point of the Sulaimani protests.

Inspired by the revolution in Egypt, protestors have, since February 17th, continuously demonstrated against the Kurdish Regional Government in Sulaimani’s central Bar Darki Sara Square, which they have renamed Maidani Azadi (“Liberation Square”) in tribute to Cairo’s Tahrir (“Liberation”) Square. In addition, as in the Egyptian protests, religious clerics are now playing a central role in the political debate.

Jihad against corruption

Nasrullah, an outspoken cleric, is playing an especially significant role in the anti-government demonstration by, for instance, calling it a “jihad” (“holy struggle”). Although protestors have generally been enthusiastic about this label, some fear this was a call for violence, which Nasrullah denies.

“I did not call for violence, but for demonstration and the solving of problems, for peace and tranquility,” the cleric said.

Nasrullah admits his actions have been inspired by theologian Sheikh Qaradawi, who led thousands of anti-government protesters in prayer in Egypt.

“In Egypt – a big Islamic country – we saw thousands of people come onto the streets to pray with imams,” said Nasrullah. “We want to support our people, who came out in support of the demonstrations. Our country needs us in these difficult times.”

Nasrullah, who studies religion in Baghdad, says the events in Maidani Azadi are something new for the whole of Iraq.

“It never happened before that people prayed on the streets, but everything that’s new also results in problems,” he said, referring to the threatening and temporary detention of some of the clerics who supported the protests.

Clerics are part of society

Demonstrators interviewed by Rudaw in the square welcomed the new role of religious clerics in the protests.

“We feel supported by them,” said Nian Farez Mohammed. “They have the right to express their opinions.”

Osman Ali Achmed, the uncle of 16-year-old Rezwan Ali, who was killed by security forces in the protests, agrees the clerics have a right to participate.

“They are a part of the society,” said Achmed. “If the people have problems, everybody participates, and so do the imams. Mullahs have the right to participate in protests.”...

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Criminal asks government to stop police. "Report: Hamas calls on UN to halt Israel's strikes on Gaza," from Haaretz, March 25 (thanks to Alexandre):

Hamas called on the United Nations on Friday to put an end to the "crime of the recent attacks on Gaza," referring to the stepped up Israeli air strikes on the Strip which have come in the wake of increased rocket fire, the pan-Arab daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi reported.

The report, which was carried by Israeli media, also said that Taher al-Nunu, a spokesman for the Hamas regime, called on the Arab League to work urgently to stop "recent Israeli aggression."

Israel must be prevented from "exploiting the instability in the region and world to carry out massacres against the Palestinian people," Taher said....

Projection Alert!

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Following up on her piece Wednesday on Senator Richard Durbin's upcoming Muslim victimhood hearings, in "Durbin’s Dedition and Dawah: Let the Pandering Begin" at Big Government today, Pamela Geller reveals more about what is wrong with Durbin's hearings:

When Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced Tuesday that he will hold a hearing next week in the Senate Judiciary Committee on the civil rights of American Muslims, everyone thought it was a joke. No other group gets the extraordinary, unconstitutional special status that Muslims enjoy. The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization whose stated goal is to destroy and eliminate America from within, has accessed and secured extraordinary power at senior levels of the Executive branch, the Department of Justice, Department of Defense, State Department, Homeland Security, etc.

One can point to Alger Hiss or Benedict Arnold for like historical antecedents. The difference between then and now is that we didn’t know that Hiss et al were seditionists whose objective was to overthrow the government. We know who and what the Brotherhood is, but the political elites, the chattering classes and the media elites have taken up their considerable weapons against those who are exposing this century’s Nazis.

Dick Durbin’s hearing – with the Orwellian title “Protecting the Civil Rights of American Muslims” – is intended to serve as a counterpunch to the much more sensible and logical (although still toothless, as I explained here and here) House Homeland Security Committee hearing led by Chairman Peter King (R-NY) two weeks ago on the radicalization of Muslims in the U.S. Senator Durbin’s press release announcing the hearing said that it was being triggered by a non-existent “spike in anti-Muslim bigotry in the last year.” Apparently, the numerous acts of terrorism committed by American Muslims, and the warnings that have even come from the Obama Administration about the homegrown radicalization of Islamic jihadists, are to be deliberately ignored in deference to Islamic demands and supremacism.

In my previous oped piece on the Durbin debacle, I thought that a hearing on “Muslim rights” would be a good idea if it addressed the increasing surrender of secular law to Islamic law, and the assertion of Islamic supremacism over the rights of all others. We need hearings on the Florida circuit court judge who just ruled that a case be decided according to Sharia law.

We need hearings on the special rights being afforded Muslims at the expense of everyone else. We need hearings on the Obama Justice Department’s suing a school district for not allowing a Muslim woman to take nearly three weeks off during the school year to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca.

We need hearings on taxpayer dollars being used to fund Islamic finance (thereby funding jihad and the prohibition of whole American business sectors). We need hearings on the violation of the separation of mosque and state in the public schools, in the workplace, in the courtroom and in foreign policy. We need hearings on the violation of the Constitution in regards to Muslims — no longer are equal rights sufficient, now it’s special rights for a very extra special class, Muslims.

But no, these hearings will be an attack on free speech and the few, the brave who speak candidly about Islamic jihad and the hundreds of thousands who have been slaughtered in jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilations and enslavements.

Durbin is pulling out all the stops to ensure that the hearing is little more than a pathetic exercise in dhimmitude with only one viewpoint represented, that of the Islamic supremacists. Indeed, the four scheduled witnesses are (i) Muslim activist Farhana Khera, the President and Executive Director of Muslim Advocates in San Francisco; (ii) Catholic Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington, DC; (iii) Tom Perez, the Justice Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and resident militant leftist who has advocated openly for the non-enforcement of federal immigration laws; and (iv) Alex Acosta, the Bush Administration top civil rights official and current dean of fourth-tier Florida International University Law School, a notorious hotbed of left-wing academics. I’m surprised that Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideological point-man on sharia law, didn’t make the cut....

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is, of course, the mainstream media. This is the mainstream media that celebrates and lauds people like Feisal Abdul Rauf, Daisy Khan, and Sharif El-Gamal. So this is no surprise. It also is yet another indication of how the American action against Libya is aiding the jihadists there.

"CNN Oddly Celebrates Hero Libyan Suicide Bomber," by Josh Clark at How Stuff Works, March 25 (thanks to Ray):

So I like to think it’s pretty tough to disgust me. But a piece last night on the Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer on CNN managed to come pretty close. The piece in question, which has been thoroughly buried, meaning I can’t dig it up, was a human interest segment on a suicide bomber in Libya. The weird thing, it was done in the same way Western media approaches stories on American troops who jump on grenades to save the rest of their platoon or a the normal guy who loses his life rescuing a kid from a burning building. Except, as I’ve said, this was a suicide bomber.

What made him courageous rather than despicably zealous, as suicide bombers are customarily portrayed in the West, was that this guy, Ahmed Al Mehdi, a 49-year-old oil worker, packed his car full of explosives and drove it as fast as he can into a guard barrier for the interests that Americans are rooting for — namely freedom, namely oil.

The reporter interviewed the man’s children, his wife, and sat with them. They caught up with his best friend, who carried what was left of Al Mehdi from the site of his martyrdom. In the piece, he was called a number of times a “hero.”

From the transcripts:

“This is where Al Medhi Zu (ph) gave his life. It’s the old military barracks here in Benghazi. It’s pretty much demolished today. But on February 19, rebel fighters had surrounded it, and they were facing heavy fire power. They were trying to get inside these military barracks. They couldn’t. They needed something to shift their momentum.

What Ah Mehdi did was pack his car full of plastic car fuel containers and cooking gas cylinders. And witnesses say he parked his car right over there where the SUV is and prayed and read the Koran for about 30 minutes, and then he sped towards the main gate where he blew himself and his car up.”...

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I tried to tell you. "Energized Muslim Brotherhood in Libya eyes a prize," by Paul Cruickshank and Tim Lister for CNN, March 25 (thanks to Ray):

(CNN) -- Dr. Abdulmonem Hresha knows first hand how Moammar Gadhafi's regime works. He says the seeds of his opposition were sown when he was age 10....

The prominent member of the Muslim Brotherhood now lives in London, and anticipates the group could become an important player in a post-Gadhafi environment.

As in Egypt and Tunisia, the Brotherhood in Libya has been energized by the sudden upheaval sweeping the Arab world.

It says it has no organizational links with the Brotherhood elsewhere, but shares the philosophy of the pan-Arab Islamist movement founded in Egypt in the 1920s.

Largely drawn from the devout educated middle classes and university campuses in Tripoli and Benghazi, the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood was founded in the mid-1950s.

Islamist opposition to the Libyan regime gathered force in the late 1980s, as part of a wider Islamic awakening or "Sahwa" in the region and in reaction to what many saw as an attempt by Gadhafi to hijack and interpret Islam for his own purposes.

While jihadists launched a brief but unsuccessful campaign to overthrow Gadhafi in the 1990s, the Brotherhood focused much of its efforts on clandestine preaching and social welfare efforts in Libya.

In 1998, Gadhafi's security services launched a crackdown against the group that saw more than 200 members imprisoned and hundreds more forced into exile, including Hresha.

Despite years of repression, Hresha claims the Brotherhood still has thousands of members scattered across Libya, with chapters in almost every single town, including Sirte, Gadhafi's birthplace on the coast west of Tripoli.

In 2006, its leaders were released after reconciling with the Libyan regime. But now the Brotherhood is siding with the rebellion....

Al-Amin Bilhaj, a leading figure in the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood and the President of the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) recently traveled to Benghazi, the headquarters of the rebel movement, according to Hresha.

Other Brotherhood exiles have returned to help treat the wounded in hospitals, according to Kemal el Helbawy, the Egyptian founder of the British association.

There is little or no overt presence of the Brotherhood in Benghazi, according to CNN's Arwa Damon, who has been there for most of the month.

But in the longer term, in a country where the political space has been dominated by Gadhafi for more than 40 years, the Brotherhood's organization and nationwide presence may afford it an advantage.

The West has nothing to fear from the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya, according to Hresha.

Like their counterparts in Egypt, they would embrace multiparty democracy.

"I've lived for many years in Canada and the UK, and that's exactly the political system that we want," Hresha said.

Hresha says that if his organization forms a political party, it would seek to legislate according to Koranic principles, which would include, for example, a continued ban on the sale of alcohol.

"Why shouldn't we be able to press our point of view -- we are humans too," he said.

Hresha said the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood welcomes airstrikes in Libya, a startling turnaround for a movement that previously supported jihad by Iraqis against U.S. forces occupying Iraq.

"I salute and am very grateful to the Americans, French and British governments for stopping the killing," he said. "I will never forget this."

Hresha said he hopes a post-Gadhafi Libya will be a close friend to the West.

A more prominent role for the Brotherhood in Libya could dent support for al Qaeda and other jihadist groups, especially in eastern provinces that have witnessed significant radicalization in recent years.

But Libya's deeply tribal structures -- unlike Egypt and Tunisia -- may complicate its efforts to build a national base.

And hardline "Salafi" preachers have gained influence in neglected towns like Derna -- on the coast near the border with Egypt.

"Conservative imams (in Derna)," a U.S. diplomat wrote in 2008, "deliberately sought to eliminate the few social activities on offer for young people to monopolize the social and cultural environment."

But in the end, the reach of the Brotherhood may be most limited by the emergence of secular forces at the forefront of the rebel movement.

The Interim National Council in Benghazi -- a 30-member opposition leadership -- is mostly made up of lawyers, doctors, intellectuals and former political prisoners with a secular bent.

In a statement Monday, the Council stated the ultimate goal of the revolution was "to build a constitutional democratic civil state based on the rule of law, respect for human rights and the guarantee of equal rights and opportunities for all its citizens including ... equal opportunities between men and women and the promotion of women empowerment."

Guma el-Gamaty, a Libyan academic based in the UK who has emerged as a key liaison between the Libyan opposition overseas and the Benghazi Council said no Muslim Brotherhood leaders had yet been appointed to the Council, and played down their influence.

Hresha, the long-time Brotherhood member, expects that to change.

"We've been working secretly till this moment," he said.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Of course their anger is completely justified. Who ever heard of mosques being used to recruit jihad terrorists? In recent years we have seen mosques used to preach hatred; to spread exhortations to terrorist activity; to house a bomb factory; to store weapons; to disseminate messages from bin Laden; to demand (in the U.S.) that non-Muslims conform to Islamic dietary restrictions; to fire on American troops; to fire upon Indian troops; to train jihadists; and so we know they're places of peace, and anyone who suggests otherwise is a greasy Islamophobe.

"Kenya: Imams Deny U.S. Claims On Isiolo Mosques," from The Nation (Nairobi), March 24 (thanks to Twostelas):

Nairobi — Imams and preachers in Isiolo have denied claims that four mosques in the area were used for recruiting youths for al-Shabaab.

Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims Isiolo branch chairman Mohamed Abdikadir led the leaders in condemning the allegations, terming them as falsehoods.

They demanded an immediate apology from the US government and warned against such allegations in future.

"It is unfortunate that US officials can mislead their government and the world by reporting such baseless claims against a religious centre," Mr Abdikadir said.

The chairman wants the US ambassador to Kenya to visit Isiolo to ascertain the truth about such allegations.

"We fear that the government might take action on innocent Kenyans on baseless claims by the foreigners," said Mr Abdikadir.

The leaked cables state that four mosques in Isiolo, Masjid Hidaya, Masjid Taqwa in Bula Odha and two other unnamed mosques located in the county were responsible for recruiting fighters for the militia group....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Don't they realize that Islam respects the People of the Book? More on this story. "Thousands of Christians Displaced in Ethiopia After Muslim Extremists Torch Churches, Homes," by Diane Macedo for FoxNews.com, March 24 (thanks to Twostellas):

Thousands of Christians have been forced to flee their homes in Western Ethiopia after Muslim extremists set fire to roughly 50 churches and dozens of Christian homes.

At least one Christian has been killed, many more have been injured and anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 have been displaced in the attacks that began March 2 after a Christian in the community of Asendabo was accused of desecrating the Koran.

The violence escalated to the point that federal police forces sent to the area two weeks ago were initially overwhelmed by the mobs. Government spokesman Shimelis Kemal told Voice of America police reinforcements had since restored order and 130 suspects had been arrested and charged with instigating religious hatred and violence.

Prime Minister Meles Zenawi said the Islamist group Kawarja is believed to have incited the violence.

"We believe there are elements of the Kawarja sect and other extremists who have been preaching religious intolerance in the area,” he said at a Saturday press conference. “In previous times, we have cracked down on Kawarja because they were involved in violence. Since then they have changed their tactics and they have been able to camouflage their activities through legal channels."

The string of attacks comes on the heels of several reports of growing anti-Christian tension and violence around the country where Muslims make up roughly one-third of the total population but more than 90 percent of the population in certain areas, 2007 Census data shows.

One of those areas is Besheno where, on November 9, all the Christians in the city woke up to find notes on their doors warning them to convert to Islam, leave the city or face death, a Christian from Besheno told FoxNews.com on condition of anonymity.

“Under the Ethiopian constitution we are supposed to have freedom of religion, but Muslim leaders in our town don’t allow us that right,” the source said....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Walid Shoebat, Zuhdi Jasser and I discussed the possibilities of reform in Islam on ABN Tuesday night.

And in case you missed my ABN debate with Marvelous Moustafa Zayed about whether Muhammad taught that non-Muslims should be warred against and subjugated, here it is again:

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In FrontPage this morning I discuss the latest challenge to the freedom of speech in Britain:

Last week British columnist Melanie Phillips wrote a blogpost at the Spectator entitled “Armchair barbarism,” discussing the brutal jihad murders of the Fogel family in Israel. Her references to the “moral depravity” of the Arab “savages” who committed the crime have gotten her in hot water with Britain’s hyper-PC Press Complaints Commission, which has launched an investigation.

Phillips is being investigated, ironically enough, for writing that “the moral depravity of the Arabs,” as she chose to term the murderers of the Fogels and those in Gaza who celebrated those murders, “is finding a grotesque echo in the moral bankruptcy and worse of the British and American ‘liberal’ media.” And as if on cue, the watchdog organization in Britain of that liberal media swooped down upon her.

The irony was compounded by a further statement in Phillips’ column: “Overwhelmingly, the media have either ignored or downplayed the atrocity – or worse, effectively blamed the victims for bringing it on themselves, describing them as ‘hard-line settlers’ or extremists.” In this case, however, they were not blaming the victim, but blaming the columnist who spoke forthrightly about the nature of the murderers.

After the column was published, the P.C. Commission received two complaints about it: one from Engage, a group that is dedicated to advancing Muslim participation in British society, and from one of Britain’s most prominent Muslim leaders, Inayat Bunglawala, the chairman of Muslims4UK. Bunglawala fumed that Phillips’ words “went far beyond just denouncing the killings. It was a far more generalised racist outburst against Arabs as a whole.”

Ignoring the fact that Arab Muslims commit jihad terror attacks on a virtually daily basis, and that there is no equivalent among Jews, Bunglawala claimed that “if you insert the word ‘Jew’ or ‘Jewish’ where she has referred to Arabs then I am sure she would have no doubt that those words would be antisemitic. Just as she abhors antisemitism it is important that she maintains the same vigorous anti-racist stance against Arabs. It is just unacceptable to use that kind of language.”

Yet Bunglawala and Engage were ignoring one undeniable fact: the Islamic jihadists who murdered the Fogel family were savages, as were those who celebrated their murders in Gaza. I would say this while standing in the middle of Trafalgar Square, and if Britain’s PC Commission had any residual sense of shame, it would drop its investigation of Phillips immediately....

There is more.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 24, 2011

I was on so many shows during the Egyptian uprising with American analysts who confidently asserted that the Muslim Brotherhood had little power and influence in Egypt, and that the post-Mubarak political landscape there would feature the flowering of a secular, pro-Western democracy. When I said that on the contrary, the Brotherhood was popular and powerful and would be in the driver's seat in Egypt once Mubarak fell, Juan Williams told me I was "fearmongering." Everyone knew that few Egyptians actually supported the Brotherhood, and James Clapper said they were "secular" anyway, so what was the big deal? Well, we'll see what the big deal was, and what substance the group's new pretensions to moderation really have.

"Islamist Group Is Rising Force in a New Egypt," by Michael Slackman for The New York Times, March 24 (thanks to Courreges W):

CAIRO — In post-revolutionary Egypt, where hope and confusion collide in the daily struggle to build a new nation, religion has emerged as a powerful political force, following an uprising that was based on secular ideals. The Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist group once banned by the state, is at the forefront, transformed into a tacit partner with the military government that many fear will thwart fundamental changes.

It is also clear that the young, educated secular activists who initially propelled the nonideological revolution are no longer the driving political force — at least not at the moment.

As the best organized and most extensive opposition movement in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood was expected to have an edge in the contest for influence. But what surprises many is its link to a military that vilified it.

“There is evidence the Brotherhood struck some kind of a deal with the military early on,” said Elijah Zarwan, a senior analyst with the International Crisis Group. “It makes sense if you are the military — you want stability and people off the street. The Brotherhood is one address where you can go to get 100,000 people off the street.”...

About six groups from the ultraconservative Salafist school of Islam have also emerged in the era after President Hosni Mubarak’s removal, as well as a party called Al Wassat, intended as a more liberal alternative to the Brotherhood.

In the early stages of the revolution, the Brotherhood was reluctant to join the call for demonstrations. It jumped in only after it was clear that the protest movement had gained traction. Throughout, the Brotherhood kept a low profile, part of a survival instinct honed during decades of repression by the state.

The question at the time was whether the Brotherhood would move to take charge with its superior organizational structure. It now appears that it has.

“The Brotherhood didn’t want this revolution; it has never been a revolutionary movement,” said Mr. Zarwan of the International Crisis Group. “Now it has happened; they participated cautiously, and they realize they can set their sights higher.”

But in these early stages, there is growing evidence of the Brotherhood’s rise and the overpowering force of Islam.

When the new prime minister, Essam Sharaf, addressed the crowd in Tahrir Square this month, Mohamed el-Beltagi, a prominent Brotherhood member, stood by his side. A Brotherhood member was also appointed to the committee that drafted amendments to the Constitution.

But the most obvious and consequential example was the recent referendum on the amendments, in the nation’s first post-Mubarak balloting. The amendments essentially call for speeding up the election process so that parliamentary contests can be held before September, followed soon after by a presidential race. That expedited calendar is seen as giving an advantage to the Brotherhood and to the remnants of Mr. Mubarak’s National Democratic Party, which have established national networks. The next Parliament will oversee drafting a new constitution.

Before the vote, Essam el-Erian, a Brotherhood leader and spokesman, appeared on a popular television show, “The Reality,” arguing for the government’s position in favor of the proposal. With a record turnout, the vote was hailed as a success. But the “yes” campaign was based largely on a religious appeal: voters were warned that if they did not approve the amendments, Egypt would become a secular state.

“The problem is that our country will be without a religion,” read a flier distributed in Cairo by a group calling itself the Egyptian Revolution Society. “This means that the call to the prayer will not be heard anymore like in the case of Switzerland, women will be banned from wearing the hijab like in the case of France,” it said, referring to the Muslim head scarf. “And there will be laws that allow men to get married to men and women to get married to women like in the case of America.”

A banner hung by the Muslim Brotherhood in a square in Alexandria instructed voters that it was their “religious duty” to vote “yes” on the amendments.

In the end, 77.2 percent of those who voted said yes.

This is not to say that the Brotherhood is intent on establishing an Islamic state. From the first days of the protests, Brotherhood leaders proclaimed their dedication to religious tolerance and a democratic and pluralist form of government. They said they would not offer a candidate for president, that they would contest only a bit more than a third of the total seats in Parliament, and that Coptic Christians and women would be welcomed into the political party affiliated with the movement.

None of that has changed, Mr. Erian, the spokesman, said in an interview. “We are keen to spread our ideas and our values,” he said. “We are not keen for power.”

He would not comment on whether the Brotherhood had an arrangement with the military, but he said the will of the people to shift toward Islam spoke for itself and was a sign of Egypt’s emerging democratic values. “Don’t trust the intellectuals, liberals and secularists,” Mr. Erian said. “They are a minor group crying all the time. If they don’t work hard, they have no future.”...

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Al-Jazeera, one of the global jihad's chief propaganda arms and the only one that masquerades as a news network, is working to expand operations in the United States. And on April 1 from noon to four at the National Press Club in Washington, an important conference will be held about why every American should oppose Al-Jazeera's U.S. expansion.

Pamela Geller, who is one of the featured speakers, explains: "Jihad murder mastermind Anwar al-Awlaki has praised al-Jazeera, and several years ago one of its most prominent reporters was arrested on terror charges. Al-Jazeera also has for years been the recipient of numerous al-Qaeda videos featuring bin Laden, Zawahiri, and American traitor Adam Gadahn. Yet they never seem to be able to trace where these videos are coming from. It's clear to any objective observer that al-Jazeera is sympathetic to the global jihad, and may be complicit in its activities."

Speakers at the conference "Al-Jazeera, Global Jihad, and the Suicide of the West" include:

* Pamela Geller, leader of the campaign against the Ground Zero Mosque and author (with Spencer!) of The Post- American Presidency
* Cliff Kincaid, the nation's leading media critic of Al-Jazeera.
* Charles Ortel, Managing Partner of Newport Value Partners, L.L.C.

This is a crucial and much-overlooked issue. Be there. Pamela Geller has more here.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What would it take for you to commit mass murder in the name of Allah?

Would you do it for money? For love? Out of a sense of justice? Out of a sense of religious duty?

Absurd as they may seem, these are serious questions, for as jihad mass-murder plots are being uncovered in the United States more frequently than ever, those accused of perpetrating them, and several Islamic groups, increasingly are charging entrapment: that overzealous FBI agents pushed poor innocent Muslims into taking part in a jihad plot that otherwise would never have existed.

"Nobody was pushing them," said Raskin. "They did it because they wanted to do it."

Of course they did.

Islamic Chutzpah Alert: "NY judge asked to toss temple plot conviction," by Tom Hays for the Associated Press, March 24 (thanks to Block Ness):

NEW YORK (AP) -- Lawyers for four men in a terror plot to blow up New York City synagogues and shoot down military planes sought to convince a judge Thursday that their convictions - and even the case itself - should be thrown out because they were entrapped by a paid FBI informant posing as an Islamic extremist.

Prosecutors argued the defendants were ready and willing to attack Americans.

The daylong arguments in a Manhattan federal court centered on the government's attempts to thwart homegrown terrorism by monitoring mosques and other locations for potential militants and, if necessary, using elaborate sting operations to neutralize them before they can do any harm.

In one of several pointed exchanges, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon noted that the scheme detailed at trial was phony from the outset.

"The plot was created before our very eyes in this courtroom," she said.

Responded Assistant U.S. Attorney David Raskin: "The law allows that to happen."

A jury found the men - alleged mastermind James Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams and Laguerre Payen - guilty last year of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and other charges....

Prosecutors alleged that in meetings with Hussain, Cromitie hatched the scheme to blow up the synagogues in the Bronx with remote-controlled bombs and shoot down cargo planes at the Air National Guard base in Newburgh with heat-seeking missiles. They say he also recruited the other men to be lookouts with promises of money. Onta and David Williams are not related....

In one of several videos played at trial, the men were seen inspecting a shoulder missile launcher in a bugged warehouse in Connecticut two weeks before the planned attack. At the end of the tape, Cromitie, two of his cohorts and the informant bow their heads in prayer.

Jurors also heard tapes of Cromitie ranting against Jews and U.S. military aggression in the Middle East

"I'm ready to do this damn thing," Cromitie said on one tape. "Anything for the cause."

The defense renewed arguments that the FBI overreached by targeting desperate, down-and-out dupes who were only in it for the petty cash and meals the informant gave them. Cromitie wavered for eight months - and even disappeared for six weeks - before finally agreeing to go forward with the plan, said defense attorney Vincent Briccetti.

"He talked the talk, but when it came to walking the walk, he didn't - until he was entrapped," he said.

Bricetti also accused authorities of misconduct by losing control of the informant - "an out-and-out total liar" - and allowing him to incite Cromitie to kill Jews.

"The government created the criminal and then they manufactured the crime," he said.

Raskin countered that the evidence showed Cromitie was the instigator, approaching the informant at the outset and later confiding unprompted that being a terrorist would fulfill a childhood ambition.

"Nobody was pushing them," he said of the defendants. "They did it because they wanted to do it."

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And AP shills for the jihadists. "Gaza militants fire rockets deep into Israel," by Aron Heller for Associated Press, March 24 (thanks to JCB):

JERUSALEM – Palestinian militants in Gaza fired a new wave of rockets that landed deep inside Israel Thursday, defying Israeli retaliatory attacks and threats.

As the violence threatened to escalate the day after a deadly Jerusalem bombing, Israel got a boost from the visiting U.S. defense chief, who said no country could tolerate the "repugnant" attacks on its soil.

Police said Gaza militants fired 10 rockets and mortars toward Israel Thursday, including two rockets that exploded north of the city of Ashdod, a main Mediterranean port city about 20 miles (30 kilometers) north of Gaza — a first since Israel and Gaza's Hamas rulers reached an unofficial truce following a three-week war that ended in January 2009. Israeli airstrikes hit a number of Gaza targets in retaliation throughout the day.

Neither side reported injuries or said they wanted a new fight. But the new hostilities could easily spin out of control, especially if civilian deaths mount.

Wednesday's bombing killed a British tourist, and five members of a Jewish family were slain while they slept in a West Bank settlement earlier this month. Israel has blamed Palestinians for both attacks.

Who else might be responsible, AP? Was Tim McVeigh seen in the area?

Also this week, Israeli shelling killed three children and their uncle in Gaza. The army said it was targeting militants....

Note AP's relentless pro-jihad bias. Do they speak about the well-established practice of Hamas of launching attacks from civilian areas, so as to draw retaliatory fire that can be used for propaganda purposes? Of course not.

Israel says Hamas has used the lull to rearm with longer distance rockets that can reach as far as Tel Aviv, about 30 miles (50 kilometers) from Gaza....

On Thursday President Barack Obama called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to offer condolences. The White House said Obama reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to Israel's security....

Sure, while expressing condolences for the Palestinian jihadists killed in Israeli defensive efforts.

Abbas, who rules on in the West Bank, has rejected violence and condemned Wednesday's bombing.

AP reports this with a straight face despite the manifest involvement of Fatah jihadists in numerous violent attacks against Israel.

Hamas, which violently wrested control of Gaza from Abbas loyalists in June 2007, sees the diplomatic standstill as proof that only an armed struggle will win the Palestinians a state.

Their own violent intransigence and determination to destroy Israel utterly couldn't have anything to do with it. Oh, no.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Below the first report is a story on the same topic from from Iran's English-language propaganda network. There is notably softer language in the latter report: in particular, there is no mention of the concept of fitna, a topic of great concern in the Qur'an as a cause for warfare. More on this story. "Hezbollah Calls Burning the Qur'an a "Crime"," from al-Manar via Translating Jihad, March 24:

Hezbollah Calls on Churches to Take the Appropriate Position on Pastor Jones' Crime of Burning the Qur'an
Commenting on Pastor Terry Jones' crime of burning a copy of the Noble Qur'an, Hezbollah issued a statement which points out that, "The crime of burning the Noble Qur'an by Pastor Terry Jones in the United States comes as part of a campaign which, through its various forms, expressions, personalities, and times, expresses hostility towards religion and divine laws."
Hezbollah expressed its "Sharp condemnation of this abominable crime," regarding it as "a call to fitna and religious strife, and a masking of the true conflicts between the arrogant and the oppressed."
Hezbollah held the American adminisration "Responsible for this crime, for it serves their arrogant designs in fomenting conflict and sectarian divisions, at a time when Muslims and Christians need cooperation and integration."

Assume the position:

Hezbollah also called on "Every religious institution to push aside these nefarious acts which serve the designs of sowing fitna in the world," appealing for "churches to take the appropriate position in regards to what was done, which serves the wicked purposes of the great conspiracy."

And now: "Hezbollah condemns Qur'an desecration," from PressTV, March 24:

Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah has condemned the recent desecration of the Holy Qur'an as an attempt to provoke sedition and religious conflicts.
"The crime of burning the holy Qur'an by Pastor Terry Jones in the United States comes as part of a campaign which is taking various forms of expression… It reflects enmity towards religion," said a Hezbollah statement on Tuesday, quoted in a Press TV report from Beirut.
The resistance movement also denounced the sacrilegious act as a call for disputes over faith and religion. “It seeks to deviate global public opinion from the real conflicts between arrogant powers and the world's oppressed people,” the Lebanese political party noted.
Hezbollah also held the American administration responsible for the crime, noting that the desecration of Muslims' holy book serves hegemonic intentions at the time Muslims and Christians must collaborate with each other.

... to do the bidding of Hizballah and their puppet-masters in Tehran.

| 59 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Those who intend to fund jihadist attacks would find all too many willing mujahedin already on British soil, and all too many of a Tiny Minority of Extremists who would celebrate a successful attack. "Libyan expats plot revenge terror attacks on UK streets over Gaddafi bombing raids," by Tom Kelly, Tim Shipman, and Ian Drury for the Daily Mail, March 24:

MI5 has warned that Libyan expats are plotting terrorist attacks in Britain in revenge for bombing raids on Colonel Gaddafi’s regime.
The threat was exposed after intelligence officers monitored hundreds of conversations between Libyans in the UK who have ‘maintained connections with Tripoli’.
It raises the spectre of a new atrocity such as the 1988 Lockerbie bombing which was ordered by Gaddafi after U.S. air raids on his palace, launched from air bases in Britain in 1986.
MI5 sent a dossier to its allies on Friday just hours before the first bombs were dropped on Libya. It warns that Islamic extremists could be bankrolled as terrorists by wealthy and respected Libyan businessmen living in the UK.
One suspected plotter was overheard saying: ‘Wherever we are, we’ll do it. We have to fight. We must be dedicated to give support.’....
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Seven years after the bombing, authorities are still working to untangle the web of Misunderstanders of Islam that made the attack possible. "4 suspected Islamic militants set to go on trial in Spain," by Al Goodman for CNN, March 24 (thanks to Twostellas):

Madrid, Spain (CNN) -- Four suspected Islamic militants are due to go on trial Thursday afternoon in Madrid for allegedly aiding fugitives from the Madrid train bombings of 2004, a National Court spokesman told CNN.
Prosecutor Miguel Angel Carballo, at Spain's National Court, seeks sentences of eight to 13 years in prison against the four male suspects, who include a Moroccan, an Algerian, a Tunisian, and a fourth man whose nationality was not immediately disclosed, said the spokesman, who by custom is not identified.
The prosecutor alleges the suspects provided clandestine lodging in Madrid and in a Barcelona suburb, as well as other aid to various fugitives who "were directly implicated" in the Madrid train bombings that killed 191 people and wounded more than 1,800, the spokesman said.
Spanish courts already have convicted 14 Islamic militants for their roles in the train bombings, along with four Spaniards, the latter for trafficking in explosives used in the attacks.
Additionally, seven other prime Islamic suspects in the attacks blew themselves up three weeks after the train bombings as police closed in on their hideout in a Madrid suburb. That explosion also killed a police officer and wounded various others.
The seventh anniversary of the train bombings was two weeks ago on March 11.
Last February, Spain's Supreme Court overturned a lower court's conviction of five other men for Islamic terrorist activities that included aiding fugitives from the Madrid train bombings and planning other attacks, according to the court order made public March 2.
The National Court in January 2010 had convicted the five other men --- three Moroccans, an Algerian and a Turk --- for collaborating or belonging to an Islamic terrorist group and sentenced them to prison terms from five to nine years....
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Detroit can't seem to catch a break: even jihadists are taking advantage of its depressed economy. Thankfully, the area was spared the economic damage that likely would have come with a successful jihadist attack. "For al-Qaida, Detroit was just the cheapest flight," by Adam Goldman and Matt Apuzzo for the Associated Press, March 24 (thanks to Block Ness):

WASHINGTON (AP) -- When an admitted al-Qaida operative planned his itinerary for a Christmas 2009 airline bombing, he considered launching the strike in the skies above Houston or Chicago, The Associated Press has learned. But tickets were too expensive, so he refocused the mission on a cheaper destination: Detroit.
The decision is among new details emerging about one of the most sensational terrorism plots to unfold since President Barack Obama took office. It shows that al-Qaida's Yemen branch does not share Osama bin Laden's desire to attack symbolic targets, preferring instead to strike at targets of opportunity. Like the plot that nearly blew up U.S.-bound cargo planes last year, the cities themselves didn't matter. It's a strategy that has helped the relatively new group quickly become the No. 1 threat to the United States.
After the failed bombing and the arrest of suspected bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the question of why Detroit was targeted had gone unanswered. It was previously reported that Abdulmutallab did not specifically choose Christmas for his mission.
Abdulmutallab considered Houston, where he attended an Islamic conference in 2008, current and former counterterrorism officials told the AP. Another person with knowledge of the case said Abdulmutallab also considered Chicago but was discouraged by the cost. All spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.
While the target and timing were unimportant, the mission itself was a highly organized plot that involved one of the FBI's most wanted terrorists and al-Qaida's go-to bomb maker, current and former officials said. Before Abdulmutallab set off on his mission, he visited the home of al-Qaida manager Fahd al-Quso to discuss the plot and the workings of the bomb....
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The situation ended non-violently, and will be spun by local Muslims as a "peaceful" resolution. Cooperation. Dialogue. Name your buzzword.

This incident is reminiscent of forced "reconciliation" meetings in Egypt where, of course, the Copts get the short end of the stick. It is another of many ways in which, if one supposes there is "no compulsion in religion" (Qur'an 2:256), the means of subtle and not-so-subtle coercion -- of finding ways to make life difficult, unpleasant, and ultimately dangerous for the subjugated non-Muslim -- are still limited only by the overlord's imagination.

"Christians pressurised into signing so-called 'peace deal' with Muslim clerics in Lahore," from Asian News International, March 24 (thanks to Twostellas):

Lahore, Mar 24 : Muslim clerics and hardliners, who tried to attack a church in Lahore's landmark Badami Bagh, have agreed to avoid doing so on a condition that the church authorities would suspend its activities, especially at the time when Muslims living in the area offer prayers.
The “peace deal” was reached through the efforts of the Badami Bagh Police Station SHO, who organised a peace committee comprising 14 people- including four Christians and ten Muslims- to settle the matter, the Daily Times reports.
However, local police sources revealed that the peace deal was signed after “posing threats and putting immense pressure on local Christians who simply succumbed to the pressure for being left alive and untouched, hence promising to follow the SHO’s and the peace committee’s directions”.
“It was quite ironic that the same people, who were members of the peace committee, also led mobs against Christians, one of them being a cleric Zubair from Madina Mosque, who called on local Muslims to unite and attack the church over accusations that the church had deliberately burnt papers containing Quranic verses, which were found on a nearby garbage heap on Tuesday morning,” they added.

Convenient: they "were found."

The local people alleged that a Christian in the area kept reciting verses from the Bible while passing through streets, and demanded that he should be barred from doing so in order to ‘ensure peace of mind’ to Muslim residents of the area.

That turn of phrase, intended or not, says a great deal. It makes Muslims' faith look weak and unstable if they are so threatened and thus so determined to suppress other expressions of faith.

Meanwhile, Christian representatives in the peace committee told the newspaper that they were very happy with the decision of the committee and local police authorities, as their on-time intervention had avoided a big chaos.

What would happen if they said they weren't happy?

Christians would never want to come into a conflict with their Muslim brothers, as they believed in peace and harmony as per Christ’s saying of “putting the second cheek forward if somebody slaps you on the first,” they added.

In citing this verse, there may be a subtle criticism of the Muslims' behavior, setting up a contrasting picture of how the religions' respective scriptures tell them to behave. For that matter, there is no "Meccan" or "Medinan" period in Christanity, no abrogation of this verse such that they could behave otherwise once politically strong enough.

The verse they quoted certainly does set the stage for a more stable, civilized society than, say, "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued" (Qur'an 9:29).

The SHO said that he did not file any cases against the clerics as per the requests of the Christian locals and church leaders, keeping in mind the possibility that such an action could have further instigated the mobs instead of calming them.
He also said that the police was closely monitoring the situation in the area although there were no chances of any riots or violence in the area anymore.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In FrontPage this morning I discuss the latest attempt to whitewash Islam and jihad and deflect attention away from Islamic supremacism and violence:

On a day when Islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in Jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when Islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two Christians outside a church in Pakistan, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in “anti-Muslim bigotry.”

Durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-Muslim human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and terror analyst Walid Phares.

Not only was the timing of Durbin’s announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood ‘s chief operating arm in the U.S.

Ellison used the bully pulpit King gave him to paint a lurid picture of Muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can Durbin top that?

The irony of Durbin’s hearings becomes even more acute when one notes that according to the most recent FBI statistics (covering 2009), anti-Jewish attacks account for 70% of hate crimes, and anti-Muslim attacks for only 9% of crimes thus classified. Durbin is preparing to hold hearings about an “anti-Muslim bigotry” that is almost completely nonexistent.

The fact of its near-nonexistence is extremely inconvenient for the Islamic victimhood industry that is now manipulating Durbin; consequently, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Muslims have not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating hate crimes, including attacks on mosques. CAIR and other groups like it want and need hate crimes against Muslims, because they can use them for political points and as weapons to intimidate people into remaining silent about the jihad threat....

There is more.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 23, 2011

In "Durbin is wrong about Muslim rights" in the Daily Caller today, Pamela Geller explains what's wrong with the PC hearings scheduled by Senator Durbin:

In the wake of Rep. Peter King’s largely toothless hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin is now scheduling Senate hearings on “Muslim rights.” According to the Washington Times, Durbin claims that “there has been a spike in anti-Muslim bigotry in the last year that demands closer attention.”

The Times also noted that “in 2009, the latest FBI statistics available, anti-Islamic hate crimes accounted for 9.3 percent of the 1,376 religiously motivated hate crimes recorded. That’s far less than the 70.1 percent that were anti-Jewish.”

“Our Constitution protects the free exercise of religion for all Americans,” Durbin said. “During the course of our history, many religions have faced intolerance. It is important for our generation to renew our founding charter’s commitment to religious diversity and to protect the liberties guaranteed by our Bill of Rights.”

But all that is off the real point. Muslims are freer in this country than in any other country in the world, and frankly, no one gives a fig what they worship. The problem arose when thousands were slaughtered in the name of Allah and for the glory of jihad.

We are entitled to our lives, Mr. Durbin. We are entitled to our security, Mr. Durbin. We are entitled to keep our babies safe, Mr. Durbin.

That is all.

Frankly, I might agree with a hearing on “Muslim rights” if it addressed the increasing surrender of secular law to Islamic law, and the assertion of Islamic supremacy over the rights of all others. We need hearings on the Florida circuit court judge who just ruled that a case be decided according to Sharia law. We need hearings on the special rights being afforded Muslims at the expense of everyone else. We need hearings on the Obama Justice Department’s suing a school district for not allowing a Muslim woman to take nearly three weeks off during the school year to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca....

Read it all.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad attacks on Israeli civilians, and Israel's military retaliates, and Obama pretends they're morally equivalent. Unconscionable, but not unexpected from a president who has immense difficulty saying anything good about Israel or anything remotely negative about any Muslim entity. "Obama calls for restraint by both sides?," by Jennifer Rubin in the Washington Post, March 23 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Shortly before 1:00 p.m. the White House released this statement:
I condemn in the strongest possible terms the bombing in Jerusalem today, as well as the rockets and mortars fired from Gaza in recent days. Together with the American people, I offer my deepest condolences for those injured or killed. There is never any possible justification for terrorism. The United States calls on the groups responsible to end these attacks at once and we underscore that Israel, like all nations, has a right to self-defense. We also express our deepest condolences for the deaths of Palestinian civilians in Gaza yesterday. We stress the importance of calm and urge all parties to do everything in their power to prevent further violence and civilian casualties.

This is tour de force of moral equivalence. He can’t simply issue a single declarative statement condemning the brutal attack by Palestinians in the heart of Jerusalem. (So much for the notion that it’s all about the West Bank.) He has condolences for both sides. And by the way, where is the condemnation for the Gazans’ attacks on Israeli civilians today? More birds chirping.

The final sentence is the most noxious: “We stress the importance of calm and urge all parties to do everything in their power to prevent further violence and civilian casualties.” If Israel were blowing up buses with children on them, he might have a point. But his fixation on creating equivalence where there should be none is morally obtuse and frankly echoes the demand Israel’s enemies use for “proportional response.” [...]

UPDATE (1:24 p.m.): If you want to know how poor Obama’s statement is, compare it to the U.N. Secretary General’s: “The Secretary-General strongly condemns a bomb attack today adjacent to a bus stop in West Jerusalem, which has reportedly killed one woman and injured over thirty Israeli civilians, some of them seriously. Such attacks are unacceptable. The Secretary-General is deeply concerned and calls for an immediate cessation of acts of terrorism and violence against civilians in order to prevent further escalation and loss of life.”

I’ll quibble with using non-existent “West Jerusalem” (there is just “Jerusalem”), but when the United Nations’ moral compass is more accurate than the White House’s you know how terrible this administration’s Israel policy is.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments and UN Council on Human Rights statements by David G. Littman: representative and spokesman for the World Union for Progressive Judaism at the United Nations in Geneva.

While at home and in hospital for treatment on and off over the past months, I managed to read books and prepare five oral statements and one written statement for the 16th session of the UN Human Rights Council, which began on February 28 (with a week of ‘higher segment’ speakers) and will end on Friday, 25 March – with the usual ‘clusters’ of resolutions. As usual, I propose to share with your readers these five brief statements on several ‘sensitive’ subjects, which were all delivered without the speaker being stopped on a ‘point of order’ by dictatorial states’ delegates. Things are even changing at the Council after widespread uprisings throughout the Arab world!

I was able to deliver my 1st WUPJ statement on the ‘Martyred Christian Minorities in the Middle East and the Blasphemy laws of Pakistan’ – our verbatim text March 11 text is printed below. The UN webcast link for readers to view this 2 minute delivery is provided here.

Another bout of prior pneumonia sent me back to hospital the next day and a good friend kindly offered to read my two oral WUPJ statements under items 6 (March 18) and the ‘Palestinian’ item 7 (March 21). After ten days I was home & ‘kicking’ and managed to deliver – even with a croaking voice – two crucial oral statements yesterday (Tuesday, March 22) on ‘violence against women’ and on ongoing Blood Libel accusations – with a special Appeal to Pope Benedict XVI to have removed the infamous 1840 Father Thomas plaque, still on display in a Damascus church.

These four additional oral statements and the written statement (with the two UN webcasts of me speaking yesterday) will follow during the next days, to allow interested Jihad-Watch readers to take one bite at a time and not be overwhelmed with too much material on one posting.

* * * * *

WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM
UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL – 16th session (28 Feb. – 25 March
2011)
Statement by David G. Littman, spokesman for the WUPJ

Promotion and protection of all human rights ... minority issues (item 3)

Dwindling Christians in Middle East / Blasphemy laws in Pakistan and at the UN

Sir, on Christmas Day we renewed our Appeal to the High Commissioner for the martyred Christian minorities of Iraq. [1]

The grave human tragedy of Middle East Christians is worsening weekly. Since 1986 we have reminded delegates of a well-known Middle East saying: “After Saturday comes Sunday”: after the dhimmi Jews have been expelled from Arab lands [2], it will be the time of the dhimmi Christians. The hazardous position of Muslim minorities in most Muslim-majority countries should also be condemned.

In a 1998 written statement to the Sub-Commission we detailed the tragedy of John Joseph, Bishop of Faisalabad [3], who killed himself to protest Pakistan's blasphemy laws against non-Muslims. [4] His suicide was related to the “blasphemy” case of Ayub Masih. [5] Asma Jahangir [6] secured the release of two other Christians in 1995 on similar blasphemy charges & was also involved in Masih’s case.

A few hours before his tragic death, Bishop Joseph publicly declared that all the charges were false and were concocted to force 15 Christian families to drop a local land dispute with Muslim villagers. He urged religious leaders and all segments of society in Pakistan to support the campaign for the repeal of the iniquitous blasphemy laws. [7] Nothing has happened since then.

A year earlier [8] at the 1997 Commission, the Organization of the Islamic Conference described as ‘blasphemy’ a true passage on Arab-Muslim Antisemitism quoted in the Special Rapporteur’s Report on Racism [9]. Two months ago, Punjab’s Governor Salman Taseer, who opposed the blasphemy laws, was shot by his own bodyguard; and only 10 days ago Pakistan’s Christian Minority Minister Shahbaz Bhatti was slaughtered by the Punjabi Taliban. [10] His assassins left leaflets promising to kill those who followed in his path “With the blessing of Allah, the mujahideen will send each of you to hell.”

Sir, it is time for this Council to recognise the growing danger worldwide from “jihadist” killers, who consider all non-Muslim minorities as inferiors, refusing equal & universal human rights to ‘infidels’ and ‘dhimmis’. Let Pakistan explain what it plans to do to end its egregious blasphemy laws, targeting Christian and other minorities – which clash with the International Covenants.

------------------------------

[1] Cf. the High Commissioner for Human Rights statement (7 January 2011), condemning religious attacks worldwide.

[2] Only a remnant of Jews remain, c. 5’000 from 950’000 in 1948 (½ of 1%); c. 30,000 in Turkey & Iran (c. 200’000, 1948).

[3] Chairman of Human Rights Commission of Catholic Bishops' Conference of Pakistan; d. 6 May 1998.

[4] http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G98/131/77/PDF/G9813177.pdf?OpenElement; Written text:
E/CN.4/Sub.2/1998/NGO/3: 14 July 1998 (available): Blasphemy legislation in
Pakistan’s Penal Code

[5] He was incarcerated in solitary confinement & sentenced to death by Session
Court Judge Rana Abdul Ghaffar (27/4/98).

[6] She became the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief from
August 2004 to July 2010.

[7] In his last circular letter published on 7 May 1998 in the Lahore edition of the
newspaper Dawn.

[8] 18 April 1997 at the Commission on Human Rights; and on 27thAugust
1997 at the Sub-Commission on Human Rights.

[9] The Report was by the then Special Rapporteur on Racism (until 2002), Maurice Glélé-Ahanhanzo (Benin).

[10] In December 2010 Minister Shahbaz Bhatti recorded a statement and asked that it be sent to the BBC in the event of his death. It was thus seen worldwide after he was slaughtered: “I am living for my community, and for suffering people” he said, gazing directly at the camera, “and I will die to defend their rights. I prefer to die for my principles, and for the justice of my community rather than to compromise.” No fellow Muslim minister dared attend his funeral and many lawyers publicly supported his killers.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will the jihadist savages celebrate this murder, as they did the Fogel family murders, or will their PR handlers instruct them to tone it down this time so as not to wake up the ever-gullible West?

An update on this story. "Woman Dies of Wounds in Jerusalem Bombing," from Israel National News, March 23 (thanks to Tziona):

A woman who was critically wounded in the bombing in Jerusalem on Wednesday afternoon has died of her injuries, doctors at Hadassah Ein Karem hospital report....
| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And that sums up the difference between the civilized man and the savage -- i.e., Israelis and "Palestinians." More on this story. "Jerusalem bus bombing injures 30," from Reuters, March 23:

A bomb has exploded near a bus stop in a Jewish neighbourhood of Jerusalem, injuring at least 30 people, police and medics said.

Police described the explosion as a terrorist attack, Israel's term for a Palestinian strike. It was the first such bombing in Jerusalem in seven years....

"[We believe] the device weighed about one to two kilograms. It exploded in a small suitcase on the sidewalk next to the bus stop," internal security minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch told Israel's Channel 2 television.

A paramedic said he had been meeting colleagues in an office nearby to discuss the dispatch of a medical team to disaster-hit Japan when they heard a loud explosion....

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmi and proud. An update on this story. "Judge issues opinion in Islamic law case," by William R. Levesque for the St. Petersburg Times, March 23 (thanks to Twostellas):

TAMPA — A Hillsborough judge under withering attack from conservatives for saying he will use Islamic law to decide if an arbitration award was correct apparently wants to explain himself.

Circuit Judge Richard Nielsen took the unusual step of issuing an opinion Tuesday even though the 2nd District Court of Appeal has stayed proceedings in a lawsuit against the Islamic Education Center of Tampa filed by four ousted trustees.

The opinion does not add anything that isn't already in the court file nor does it make any finding of law. But Nielsen appears to take great pains to explain the reasoning behind his controversial decision.

The issue involves whether an arbitration award in the case by an Islamic scholar, called an a'lim, was proper. The a'lim ruled Dec. 28 that the mosque's ex-trustees were ousted improperly, a decision that, if it sticks, might wrest control of $2.2 million from the center's current leaders....

"The court has concluded that as to the question of enforceability of the arbitrator's award the case should proceed under ecclesiastical Islamic law," the judge wrote.

The judge noted in his opinion that he must hear further testimony to determine whether "Islamic dispute resolution procedures have been followed in this matter."...

The judge's March 3 ruling saying he would use Islamic law, known as sharia, to decide the arbitration issue was quickly appealed by the mosque's attorney to the 2nd DCA. The mosque argues that state law should decide the issue and to inject religion into the case violates the U.S. Constitution.

The mosque's attorney, Paul Thanasides, also wants to take deposition testimony from the a'lim, who lives in Texas.

In an irony probably not lost on some of the litigants, the a'lim's attorney has filed a motion with a Texas judge to prevent Thanasides from deposing the a'lim.

What does the attorney think bars testimony by an arbitrator?

Texas law.

Ironic indeed.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will the Islamophobia never end? "Two Christians gunned down by armed Muslims outside Church in Pakistan," from AsiaNews, March 23 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Karachi (AsiaNews / Agencies) - Two Christians were gunned down and two others are in serious condition after young Muslims attacked them outside a church in Hyderabad on the evening of March 21. Christians living in Camp Hurr, in Hyderabad, in Sindh, were celebrating the 30th anniversary of the founding of their church and the Salvation Army when a group of young Muslims gathered outside the church, playing loud music and annoying the Christian women who entered the church.

Younis Masih, 47, Siddique Masih, 45, Jameel Masih, 22, and a youth named Waseem came out of a church to ask the Muslims to respect the people and place. An argument ensued. Shortly afterwards the Muslims returned armed with guns. Witnesses say that Muslims opened fire immediately, killing him instantly Younis Masih and Jameel Masih, and seriously injuring the other two Christians, who were transported to hospital in Karachi. Younis Masih leaves a wife and four children; Jameel only married a month ago.

The attitude of the authorities has exacerbated the Christians. Jameel's mother, Surraya Bibi, says: "The police acted as if it was not important. They didn’t file the report until late at night when we blocked the main road of Hyderabad, with the two dead bodies for several hours". So far police have not arrested any of the accused, who are still at large. They instead arrested some teenagers who are not involved in the crime.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Watch for this to be an orgy of Muslim claims of victimhood and demonization of freedom fighters trying to defend Constitutional freedoms against Islamic supremacism. "Senate to hold hearings on Muslims' rights," by Stephen Dinan for the Washington Times, March 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Just weeks after House Republicans held a hearing looking at the dangers of radical Muslims in the U.S., Senate Democrats are countering with a hearing of their own, scheduled for after Congress returns from a 10-day vacation, to examine Muslims' civil rights.

Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, announced the subcommittee hearing Tuesday, saying there has been a spike in anti-Muslim bigotry in the last year that demands closer attention.

“Our Constitution protects the free exercise of religion for all Americans,” Mr. Durbin said. “During the course of our history, many religions have faced intolerance. It is important for our generation to renew our founding charter’s commitment to religious diversity and to protect the liberties guaranteed by our Bill of Rights.”...

In 2009, the latest FBi statistics available, anti-Islamic hate crimes accounted for 9.3 percent of the 1,376 religiously motivated hate crimes recorded. That's far less than the 70.1 percent that were anti-Jewish.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

APbias.jpg


Shameful. (Thanks to Multisync.)

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As the savage jihad against Israel heats up again. Initial reports are conflicting.

"Dozens of casualties in Jerusalem explosion: police," by Jeffrey Heller for Reuters, March 23 (thanks to Ima):

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - An explosion on or near a bus in Jerusalem on Wednesday caused dozens of casualties, police said.

Scores of ambulances converged on the area, near the central bus station and a city conference hall in a Jewish neighborhood of downtown Jerusalem.

"Explosion rocks Jerusalem bus stop; 25 wounded," from AP, March 23 (thanks to JCB):

JERUSALEM – A bomb exploded at a crowded bus stop Wednesday in central Jerusalem, wounding at least 25 people in what appeared to be the first militant attack in the city in several years.

The blast could be heard throughout Jerusalem and blew out the windows of two crowded buses.

Rescuers were seen removing bloodied people from the area on stretchers.

Israel's national rescue service said 25 people were wounded, including 15 seriously. No deaths were reported....

"Terror attack in Jerusalem," by Omri Efraim for Ynet News, March 23 (thanks to Tziona):

An explosion occurred near a number 74 bus as it passed before the Jerusalem Convention Center. Magen David Adom rescue forces declared a mass casualty event and ambulances were alerted to the scene.

So far paramedics say there are 20 injured people at the scene, suffering wounds ranging from moderate to severe.

Police say the explosion was caused by a device placed at a telephone booth, which was later found nearby. Officers are searching for additional devices while trying to clear passers-by from the scene, yelling that it could still be dangerous....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

“This is a political lawsuit to placate Muslims.”

"Justice Department sues on behalf of Muslim teacher, triggering debate," by Jerry Markon in the Washington Post, March 22 (thanks to Twostellas):

BERKELEY, Ill. — Safoorah Khan had taught middle school math for only nine months in this tiny Chicago suburb when she made an unusual request. She wanted three weeks off for a pilgrimage to Mecca.

The school district, faced with losing its only math lab instructor during the critical end-of-semester marking period, said no. Khan, a devout Muslim, resigned and made the trip anyway.

Justice Department lawyers examined the same set of facts and reached a different conclusion: that the school district’s decision amounted to outright discrimination against Khan. They filed an unusual lawsuit, accusing the district of violating her civil rights by forcing her to choose between her job and her faith.

As the case moves forward in federal court in Chicago, it has triggered debate over whether the Justice Department was following a purely legal path or whether suing on Khan’s behalf was part of a broader Obama administration campaign to reach out to Muslims....

Considering that Khan was under no obligation, Islamic or otherwise, to make the hajj at that time, it seems clear that this is part of Obama's relentless, consistently pursued policy of appeasement of Muslim demands.

The lawsuit, filed in December, may well test the boundaries of how far employers must go to accommodate workers’ religious practices — a key issue as the nation grows more multicultural and the Muslim population increases. But it is also raising legal questions. Experts say the government might have difficulty prevailing because the 19-day leave Khan requested goes beyond what courts have considered.

“It sounds like a very dubious judgment and a real legal reach,” said Michael B. Mukasey, who was attorney general in the George W. Bush administration. “The upper reaches of the Justice Department should be calling people to account for this.”

His successors in the Obama administration counter that they are upholding a sacred principle: the right of every American to be free of religious bias in the workplace. “This was a profoundly personal request by a person of faith,” said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights, who compared the case to protecting “the religious liberty that our forefathers came to this country for.”...

Perez denied any political motive in the Berkeley lawsuit, saying it was pursued in part to fight “a real head wind of intolerance against Muslim communities.” People in the rapidly growing Muslim community in Chicago’s western suburbs praised the Justice Department’s involvement.

“It rings the bell of justice that they will fight for a Muslim wanting to perform a religious act,” said Shaykh Abdool Rahman Khan, resident scholar at the Islamic Foundation mosque near Berkeley. “That certainly can win the hearts of many people in the Muslim world.”...

Yeah, like all those roads and hospitals and schools in Afghanistan have made the Afghans love us so.

The support for Obama’s Justice Department is much more mixed. Government lawyers, said longtime village President Michael A. Esposito, are “targeting a small community.”

“The school district just wanted a teacher in the room for those three weeks. They didn’t care if she was a Martian, a Muslim or a Catholic,” said Esposito, a political independent. “How come we bow down to certain religious groups? Why don’t we go out of our way for the Baptists or the Jehovah’s Witnesses?”

Why indeed?

Khan, 29, who grew up in North Carolina and Arkansas, was happy in the job, said her lawyer, Kamran A. Memon. But she longed to make the hajj, one of the five pillars of the Islamic faith, which Muslims are obligated to do once. It would not have fallen on her summer break for about nine years.

She would be 38 then. Clearly way too old to make the hajj.

“This was the first year she was financially able to do it,” Memon said. “It’s her religious belief that a Muslim must go for hajj quickly . . . that it’s a sin to delay.” Khan declined to comment.

Islamic scholars generally say that Muslims who have the ability to go on the hajj but delay it for no specific reason are committing a major sin. Is the fact that Khan has work obligations a specific reason to delay her hajj? Certainly.

In August 2008, Khan requested an unpaid leave for the first three weeks of December that year. The district said the leave was unrelated to Khan’s job and not authorized by the teacher union contract, according to court documents. Khan resigned in a letter to the school board.

“They put her in a position where she had to choose,” Memon said. “Berkeley has qualified subs. She didn’t feel her absence would cause any problem at all.”

He attributed the criticism of the lawsuit, in part, to “anti-Muslim hostility.”

Of course. That's what it always is, right? It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that her request is entirely unreasonable. Oh no! It's just all about anti-Muslim hate! You'd think that Islamic supremacists would grow ashamed of constantly playing this card in the most outlandish of contexts, but they don't appear to be capable of shame.

Federal intervention

In November 2008, Khan filed a religious discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and last year, the commission found cause for discrimination and referred the case to the Justice Department.

Justice lawyers sued in December, the first lawsuit in a pilot project to increase coordination on employment discrimination between the department’s Civil Rights Division and the EEOC.

The suit argued that the district violated the Civil Rights Act by failing to accommodate Khan’s religious beliefs. By “compelling” Khan to choose between her job and religion, the lawsuit says, the district forced her discharge. The government is seeking back pay, damages and reinstatement for Khan, and a court order requiring Berkeley schools to find ways to accommodate religious practices.

A trial date has not been set.

Berkeley school officials declined to comment but said in court papers that Khan’s request was “unreasonable” and would have imposed an “undue hardship.”

Obviously.

Federal law requires employers to “reasonably accommodate” religious practices unless doing so would impose such a hardship. The Supreme Court has interpreted the provision narrowly, saying accommodations should be granted only if they impose a minimal burden on employers.

Hans von Spakovsky, a Justice Department civil rights official in the Bush administration, said, “No jury anywhere would think that a teacher leaving for three weeks during a crucial time at the end of a semester is reasonable.”

“This is a political lawsuit to placate Muslims,” he said....

That sums it up.

A few miles away at the Islamic Foundation, support for Khan was uniform.

"Uniform"? Don't these greasy Islamophobes know that Islam is not a monolith?

“If she was a Jew, would they treat her the same way?” Nabih Kamaan of Bloomingdale, Ill., asked as he arrived for Friday prayers.

Answer: yes. But not Kamaan's reflexive Islamic antisemitism.

“What if she was sick? What if she had a baby?” said Kamaan, who added that the lawsuit “is the right thing to do.”

Getting sick and having a baby is not the sort of thing one can ordinarily schedule with precision. The hajj, on the other hand, must be made once in a lifetime. Why did she have to make it right then? To establish and reinforce the point that non-Muslims must always accommodate Muslim demands, no matter how unreasonable. And now Khan has Obama's help to do that.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Takfir is the declaration that a fellow Muslim, by acting against Islam in some way, has become an unbeliever. Here it is in action. "Insurgents kill 3 Muslims in south of Thailand," from Reuters, March 23 (thanks to Twostellas):

YALA, Thailand - Suspected insurgents shot dead three villagers, including a paramilitary guard, in Thailand's restive Muslim south, police said on Wednesday, the latest violence in the region bordering Malaysia.

At least 10 gunmen, believed to be separatist rebels, stormed a house in Narathiwat province on Tuesday night and opened fire on a Muslim couple and their neighbor as they watched television, Police Lieutenant Pairat Kiatjaroensiri said.

Among the victims was a 33-year-old defense volunteer, one of hundreds trained by the government to provide security in villages across Yala, Narathiwat and Pattani provinces, where ethnic Malay separatists are waging a bloody rebellion against the Thai state.

The paramilitary guards are often viewed as government spies and are prime targets for assassination by insurgents.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But deep down, they really, really want peace. "Desecration, attacks at ancient Jewish cemetery," by Josh Lederman for the Associated Press, March 23 (thanks to Bill):

JERUSALEM (AP) -- A wide patch of steep hillside overlooking Jerusalem's Old City holds row after row of graves. Biblical prophets, revered rabbis and a prime minister are buried there. Yet many of the tombstones have been smashed, litter is strewn around and tethered donkeys defecate on top of graves....

The cemetery is believed to hold the graves of biblical prophets Haggai, Malachi and Zechariah. The list of modern Jewish figures buried there includes Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the father of modern Hebrew, and Nobel Prize laureate Shai Agnon.

Rabbi Avraham Kook, the chief rabbi of British Mandatory Palestine, and Rabbi Shlomo Goren, a former chief rabbi of Israel, are also buried there.

Some Israelis claim Palestinians from surrounding east Jerusalem neighborhoods attack visitors two to three times a week, sometimes stoning funeral processions. They accuse Arabs of building illegally on top of graves, using tombstones as goalposts for soccer games and lobbing firebombs to desecrate the cemetery.

At a recent visit to the cemetery, Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, said he's heard from hundreds of families in the U.S. who can't visit buried relatives without protection from armed guards.

"If you hear the families, the pain and the fact that they're afraid to come here, what does it say?" Hoenlein asked. "In Jerusalem, Jews can't go and visit an ancient burial site that is supposedly sacred?"...

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And he don't mean no interior spiritual struggle. "Jihad against India only solution to Kashmir issue: Nazria Pakistan Trust," from ANI, March 23:

The Nation's editor-in-chief and Nazria Pakistan Trust (NPT) Chairman Majid Nizami has reiterated that Pakistan must wage jihad against India to 'free' Kashmir.

"I ask every Pakistani who acts upon the spirit of Islam to make oneself ready for Jihad," The Nation quoted Nizami, as saying while presiding over a sitting at Aiwan-e-Karkunan Tehrik-e-Pakistan.

He said that Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah had termed Kashmir a jugular vein of Pakistan and had ordered the then army chief to send Pakistani forces into Kashmir for its independence, but the latter had refused to follow Jinnah's order.

Since that day, no army chief even tried to please the Quaid-e-Azam's soul, he regretted, adding that jihad is the only solution to the Kashmir dispute.

Nizami also said that there must be a war between Pakistan and India on water issues.

"India is constructing dams at rivers' flow from Kashmir to Pakistan, conspiring to turn our land into waste, " the NPT Chairman alleged, adding that the country would convert into desert if it fails to free its jugular vein from Hindus.

Former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief Lieutenant General (retired) Hameed Gul, who was the chief guest on the occasion, observed that India wanted to deprive Pakistan of water with the support of international imperialists, but their actual target was the country's atomic assets....

Gul may be retired, but his spirit lives on at ISI.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Seeing as how I was brought to you by these genocides, it seemed only fitting and proper that I should speak. "Armenian, Greek, Assyrian Genocides Commemoration in NYC," by Apostolos Papapostolou in the Greek Reporter, March 17:

A tribute to the victims of the Greek, Armenian and Assyrian Genocides will be paid in New York on April 6, 2011, the Hellenic League of America said in a media alert. This year’s commemoration is organized and hosted by Panthracian Union of America ‘Orpheus’ and supported by the Hellenic League of America, HLA. It will feature such guest speakers as two time New York Times bestselling Author and Director of Jihad Watch.org, Robert Spencer; Editor and Publisher of Atlas Shrugs and Executive Director of Freedom Defense Initiative and Stop Islamization of America, Pamela Geller; First Vice-President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, Professor Alex Hinton; President of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, Elias Tsekerides and President of the PanPontian Federation of U.S.A. and Canada, Dimitris Molohides.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Symposium: The Mismanaged War Against Libya" at FrontPage today, a panel including Michael Ledeen, Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa, Walid Phares and me explores what American — and Western — interests are served by the coalition’s war against Libya. The answer: none.

Robert Spencer, let us begin with you. What is your position on the coalition campaign, with U.S. involvement, against Gaddafi?

Spencer: As the U.S. fired over one hundred Tomahawk cruise missiles into Libya Saturday, the objective seems clear. Barack Obama declared that “we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy.” He explained: “Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world.” But he didn’t explain how acting forcibly to remove Muammar Gaddafi would indeed be in America’s interests. And that is a case that is not as easily made as it might appear to be.

How could removing Gaddafi not be in America’s interests? It is unlikely that he will be succeeded by Thomas Jefferson. The fact that Gaddafi is a reprehensible human being and no friend of the U.S. does not automatically turn his opponents into Thomas Paine.

Obama has affirmed his support for “the universal rights of the Libyan people,” including “the rights of peaceful assembly, free speech, and the ability of the Libyan people to determine their own destiny,” but he has never specified who in Libya is working to uphold and defend those rights. He has praised “the peaceful transition to democracy” that he says is taking place across the Middle East, and yet the countries where uprisings have taken place have no democratic traditions or significant forces calling for the establishment of a secular, Western-style republics.

Eastern Libya, where the anti-Gaddafi forces are based, is a hotbed of anti-Americanism and jihadist sentiment. A report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center reveals that over the last few years, more jihadists per capita entered Iraq from Libya than from any other Muslim country – and most of them came from the region that is now spearheading the revolt against Gaddafi.

That may explain why Libyan protesters have defaced Gaddafi’s picture with the Star of David, the hated symbol of the Jews, whom the Koran designates as the “strongest in enmity” toward the Muslims. There has been a notable absence among the protesters of anything equivalent to “Don’t Tread On Me” flags or other signs that what the uprising is really all about is establishing the ballot box and the give-and-take of open-society politics. The Libyan protesters have chanted not “Give me liberty or give me death!,” but “No god but Allah!”

Abu Yahia al-Libi, a Libyan who heads up al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, has warmly praised the uprising in his homeland, calling on Libyans to murder the tyrant and crowing: “Now it is the turn of Gaddafi after he made the people of Libya suffer for more than 40 years.” He said that removing Gaddafi as well as other Middle Eastern autocrats was “a step to reach the goal of every Muslim, which is to make the word of Allah the highest” – that is, to establish a state ruled by Islamic law.

And America’s Tomahawk cruise missiles will have helped bring about such a state in Libya.

Pacepa: I fully agree with Robert Spencer.

There are few people on earth who want to see Gaddafi removed from power more than I do. I could write a book about my reasons, and maybe someday I will. Here I will just say that, after I was granted political asylum by President Carter (1978), Gaddafi set a $2 million bounty on my head because I had revealed his secret efforts to arm international terrorists with bacteriological and other weapons of mass destruction. But my personal animus against Gaddafi is my own policy, and it should not have anything to do with the policy of the U.S. Nor should the personal hatred for Gaddafi on the part of other Americans, such as those whose relatives he killed at the La Belle nightclub in West Berlin (1986), in the Pan Am Flight 103 at Lockerbie (1988) or elsewhere, be raised to the level of U.S. foreign policy.

The U.S., policy toward Libya—and any other country—should defend and promote only the interests of the United States. Unfortunately, the current events taking place in Libya show that our administration does not have any coherent foreign policy toward that country, and that U.S. foreign policy simply blows with the prevailing wind. [...]

Ledeen: A week ago I wrote a little blog wondering what Obama might do to prevent everyone from concluding he’s a wimp. I confessed that this thought worried me quite a bit, as it had in the 1970s when Carter’s name became inseparably tied to “wimp.” Every author falls in love with his own words, but I hope to be forgiven for saying that I was right to worry.

I quite agree with both Robert Spencer and General Pacepa, both of whom remind us of my grandmother’s famous bit of folk wisdom, “things are never so bad that they can’t get worse.” Indeed, both of them raise the truly paradoxical and terrible possibility that we may “win” in Libya, only to find that we have made things worse: worse for American interests, worse for the Libyan people, worse for the whole region, which hardly needs to get even worse. [...]

Phares: [...] I do agree with Mr. Spencer that many jihadists have been recruited from Libya, and particularly from its eastern provinces. I also agree with General Pacepa that Western policies towards Gaddafi’s regime were incoherent. And I certainly agree with Dr. Ledeen that US policy should support true democratic forces and uprisings in the region from Iran to the Arab world.

In short I would have advised for a different set of US global strategies in the Middle East. We should have backed the Iranian Green Revolution in 2009, the Cedars Revolution as it struggles against Hezbollah, and Darfur in its liberation drive against the Jihadist regime in Khartoum. In Egypt, we should have clearly sided with the secular youth and Copts, as they asked for a new constitution. In Iraq, we should have been clear in supporting reformist and secular forces. [...]

Read it all.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 22, 2011

Muslims can only be victims, and Jews can only be aggressors. Anything that could possibly arouse sympathy for those "strongest in enmity" to Muslims (Qur'an 5:82) is bad for business, and clearly Hamas cannot tolerate that. Toward the end of the report, we find out the Palestinian Authority can't, either. And they're supposed to be the "moderate" guys.

"Hamas protests UN plans to teach Gazans about the Holocaust," from the Associated Press, March 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The United Nations has launched a new plan to teach the Holocaust in Gaza schools, drawing fierce condemnation from Gaza's militant Hamas rulers, school teachers - and even the body tasked with peace negotiations with Israel.
If implemented, it would be the first time most Palestinian children learn about Jewish suffering. But the outcry underscores how sensitive the issue is to Palestinians.
"Playing with the education of our children in the Gaza Strip is a red line," Hamas Education Minister, Mohammed Asqoul told a website of the group. He said Hamas will block attempts to teach the Holocaust regardless of the price.
The uproar erupted after a UN official told a Jordanian daily in February that UNRWA, the main UN agency serving Palestinian refugees, would introduce a short case study about the Holocaust to Gaza students as part of its human rights curriculum.
"Instead of pre-emptive accusations, it is important for Palestinians ... to fully understand the tragedies and suffering that happened to all people through generations, without divvying up facts and taking things out of context," the official, Sami Mushasha, was quoted as saying.
UNRWA representatives refused to comment on the record, but one official said the agency was committed to introducing the curriculum for the next school year, beginning in September.
He added that officials were hesitating because they feared Hamas would incite loyalists to damage UN schools or harm their teachers if they introduce the materials. He requested anonymity because he was barred from discussing the matter with the media.
Hamas frequently accuses the UN of spreading immorality, and unknown assailants have attacked the agency's property in the past, including the torching of summer camps last year.
Since Hamas seized power of Gaza in 2007, it has viewed the UN as the main challenger to their influence in the coastal territory. Officials have tried to limit the international group's vast influence in Gaza, where it operates schools for some 200,000 children.
But the controversy over teaching the Holocaust in Gaza is more than a power struggle between the UN and Hamas, whose militant officials frequently deny the Nazi genocide of European Jewry ever occurred.
Many Palestinians are reluctant to acknowledge Jewish suffering, fearing it would diminish recognition of their own claims. Views range from outright denial to challenging the scope of the Holocaust.
Even Hamas' bitter enemy, the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which rules the West Bank, reacted angrily to the UN plan. And the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the chief body tasked with negotiating peace with Israel, rejected the idea.
"Teaching the Holocaust to Palestinian students in UN schools is unacceptable," said Zakaria al-Agha, a member of the PLO's executive committee.[...]
Yet even if the UN moves ahead with the plan this year, it could face another obstacle: its own schoolteachers. In about a dozen interviews, they said they did not want to teach the materials and warned of rebellion.
"The agency will open the gates of hell with this step," said one schoolteacher, Sami. "This will not work."
| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

70% of Oklahomans voted to ban Sharia last November, but an ignorant Leftist judge, Vicki Miles-LaGrange, bought Hamas-linked CAIR's deceptive line that Sharia was just private religious law, and ruled against the will of the people. The obvious problem with her ruling is that no one cares if Muslims choose to practice Islam; the only difficulty arises when they infringe upon the rights of others in that practice. The political and supremacist elements of Islam that contradict the U.S. Constitution were the point of the Oklahoma law, not Islamic laws regarding prayers or ablutions or the Ramadan fast and the like.

The new law (thanks to Ron) is more pointed and doesn't mention Sharia, but accomplishes the purpose.

SECTION 1 (C) Any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, rule, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions.
| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Libya.jpg


Obama's bombing of Libya is aiding the jihadists. Confirmation from an unlikely source of what I wrote here. "U.S. Bombs Libya, Helps... Jihadists?!," by Tim Dickinson in Rolling Stone (of all places), March 21:

America is now at war to protect a Libyan province that's been an epicenter of anti-American jihad.

In recent years, at mosques throughout eastern Libya, radical imams have been "urging worshippers to support jihad in Iraq and elsewhere," according to WikiLeaked cables. More troubling: The city of Derna, east of Benghazi, was a "wellspring" of suicide bombers that targeted U.S. troops in Iraq.

By imposing a no-fly zone over Eastern Libya, the U.S. and its coalition partners have effectively embraced the breakaway republic of Cyrenaica. As you can see on the map above, Libya is a mashup of three historically distinct provinces. As recently as the 1940s, Cyrenaica was an independent emirate, with its capital in Benghazi. [...]

Flash forward to 2008: A West Point analysis of a cache of al Qaeda records discovered that nearly 20 percent of foreign fighters in Iraq were Libyans, and that on a per-capita basis Libya nearly doubled Saudi Arabia as the top source of foreign fighters.

The word "fighter" here is misleading. For the most part, Libyans didn't go to Iraq to fight; they went to blow themselves up — along with American G.I.'s. (Among those whose "work" was detailed in the al Qaeda records, 85 percent of the Libyans were listed as suicide bombers.) Overwhelmingly, these militants came "from cities in North‐East Libya, an area long known for Jihadi‐linked militancy."

A WikiLeaked cable from 2008 explained that Cyrenaicans were waging jihad against U.S. troops as "a last act of defiance against the Qadhafi regime." After the U.S. normalized relations with Qaddaffi in 2006, Cyrenacians believed they no longer had any shot at toppling him:

Many easterners feared the U.S. would not allow Qadhafi's regime to fall and therefore viewed direct confrontation with the GOL [Government of Libya] in the near-term as a fool's errand.... Fighting against U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq represented a way for frustrated young radicals to strike a blow against both Qadhafi and against his perceived American backers.

The epicenter of Libyan jihadism is the city of Derna — the hometown of more than half of Libya's foreign fighters, according the West Point analysis. The city of 80,000 has a history of violent resistance to occupying powers — including Americans, who captured the city in the First Barbary War.

A surprisingly readable cable titled "Die Hard in Derna" makes clear that the city "takes great pride" in having sent so many of its sons to kill American soldiers in Iraq, quoting one resident as saying: "It's jihad — it's our duty, and you're talking about people who don't have much else to be proud of."

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Only 18 years? Why? Would more have been "Islamophobic"? "‘Honour killing’ dad faces 18 years in prison," from The Local, March 21 (thanks to Joseph):

A man in Sweden has been sentenced to 18 years in prison after being found guilt of murdering his daughter in a so-called honour killing.

Subhi Othman, who admitted to stabbing his daughter to death in November last year, was sentenced Monday to 18 years in prison by the district court in Nyköping, south of Stockholm.

After killing his daughter on the stairs of the family home, Othman gave himself up to the police.

When police arrived on the scene, they found his daughter lying in the foetal position at the bottom of the stairs. She had been stabbed 53 times.

During questioning, Othman claimed he saw no other solution as his daughter was leading what he viewed as an ‘indecent’ lifestyle.

According to tabloid Aftonbladet, Othman began hating his daughter after her husband had filed for divorce. Behind this was a rumour of infidelity....

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This fatwa is noteworthy since Islamic apologists in the West routinely deny that Islamic law forbids non-Muslims to build new houses of worship or repair old ones. Not only does Sheikh Sa'id 'Abd-al-'Athim affirm that, but he also explains why it's different when Muslims are forbidden to build mosques in Italy -- which, of course, isn't even happening. "Fatwa: On Resembling the Infidels," from Translating Jihad, March 22:

Translated from al-fath.net, the website of Egyptian Shaykh Sa'id 'Abd-al-'Athim, 7 Dec 2010:

Title of the fatwa: The ruling on building and repairing churches for Christians in the lands of Muslims

Fatwa number: 7

Fatwa date: 7 Dec 2010

Question: Peace be upon you, as well as the mercy and blessings of Allah. Our eminent shaykh, I read in one of your fatwas on this good and blessed website that it is not permissible for Christians to build or repair churches. What is the evidence for this? Is there evidence in the Qur'an or Sunnah which says that it is forbidden to build churches, or does that only come from jurisprudence?

Answer: In the name of Allah, to Allah be the praise. Peace be upon the Messenger of Allah, as well as upon his family, companions, and whoever follows him.

This is explained in detail in the book, "The Rulings for the People of the Dhimma [i.e. Jews and Christians]" by Imam Ibn Qayyim. It should also suffice you to review my book, "Calling the People of the Book to the Religion of the Lord of Mankind," for there are useful things in it. I previously answered your question, and explained to you what they do with the Muslims in some European countries like Italy, in regards to preventing them from building mosques there. The shari'ah does not treat equally things which are different, nor does it treat differently things which are equal. This is the justice by which oppression is removed. For example, when a person of the Book congratulates me on my holiday, he is congratulating the truth, but when I congratulate him on his holiday, I am congratulating falsehood, for holidays are one of the greatest signs of the religion. Wherefore the infidels, even if they have to spend a great deal of money, would like for Muslims to participate with them in their holidays. There is the saying, "Whoever resembles a people is of them," and also, "Whoever loved a people will be gathered with them." Similarity on the outside leads to similarity on the inside...

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

LibyaBombs.jpg


Human Events entitled my latest piece "U.S. Bombs on Libya May Backfire," but it's hard to see how something that lacks a clear objective in the first place can backfire.

As the U.S. fired more than 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles into Libya on Saturday, the objective seems clear. Barack Obama declared that “we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy.” He explained: “Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world.” But he didn’t explain how acting forcibly to remove Muammar Gaddafi would indeed be in America’s interests. And that is a case that is not as easily made as it might appear to be.

How could removing Gaddafi, who is undeniably a tyrant and fanatically anti-American, not be in America’s interests? The simple answer is that it is unlikely that he will be succeeded by Thomas Jefferson or John Adams. The fact that Gaddafi is a reprehensible human being and no friend of the U.S. does not automatically turn his opponents into Thomas Paine.

Obama has strongly affirmed his support for “the universal rights of the Libyan people,” including “the rights of peaceful assembly, free speech, and the ability of the Libyan people to determine their own destiny,” but he has never specified exactly who in Libya is working to uphold and defend those rights. He has praised “the peaceful transition to democracy” that he says is taking place across the Middle East, and yet the countries where uprisings have taken place have no democratic traditions or significant forces calling for the establishment of a secular, Western-style republics.

In fact, there is considerable evidence to the contrary. Eastern Libya, where the anti-Gaddafi forces are based, is a hotbed of anti-Americanism and jihadist sentiment. A report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center reveals that during the last few years, more jihadists per capita entered Iraq from Libya than from any other Muslim country—and most of them came from the region that is now spearheading the revolt against Gaddafi....

There is more.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on that little slice of insanity based in Pennsylvania. "Meet 'the Most Dangerous Islamist on Planet Earth' He lives in Pennsylvania," from Canada Free Press, March 21:

The latest documents from Wikileaks shows growing concern among U. S. officials over Fethullah Gulen’s attempts to create a New Islamic World and the “braining washing of students” that takes place at his charter schools within the United States and throughout the Muslim world.
The cable that speaks of the “brain-washing” was written in 2009 by James Jeffrey, the U. S. Ambassador to Turkey.
In the cable, Mr. Jeffrey describes Gülen as a “political phenomena” in Turkey even when he resides “in exile” within a mountain fortress in Pennsylvania. He says the Gülen movement has gained control of Turkey’s government and dictates Turkish policy which has become increasing anti-Israeli and anti-American. It points out that the leaders of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma or AKP) who now govern Turkey, including Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul, appear to serve as Gulen’s puppets.
Other newly released cables state that Gulen’s disciples now direct the country’s 200,000 strong police force - - a force that remains in conflict with the military, which sees the group as an enemy.
In recent months, Turkish military leaders, and other critics of the AKP, have been arrested in the dead of night and whisked off to detention cells.
According to NurettinVeren, who served as Fethullah Gulen’s right-hand man “There are imam security directors; imams wearing police uniforms. Many police commissioners get their orders from imams.”
“It is not possible to confirm the Turkish police are under the control of the Gülen community members, but we have not met anybody who denies it,” one cable said. The most dangerous Islamist on planet earth
Gulen has been labeled “the most dangerous Islamist on planet earth,” although he has failed to attract the attention of U. S. counter-terrorism experts and the national media.
Gülen is a student and follower of Sheikh Sa’id-i Kurdi (1878-1960), also known as Sa’id-i Nursi, the founder of the Islamist Nur (light) movement. After Turkey’s war of independence, Kurdi demanded, in an address to the new parliament, that the new republic be based on Islamic principles. Kurdi turned against Atatürk and his reforms and against the new modern, secular, Western republic and Gulen has followed his militant mentor’s example.
Hailed as an outstanding educator by Graham Fuller and other CIA officials, the reclusive Gulen is semi-literate and lacks a high school diploma.
In 1999, he was driven from his native Turkey because of his attempts to overthrow the secular Turkish government.
Objectives of transforming Turkey into an Islam republic and of creating a New Islamic World Order
In his sermons, Gulen has stated his objectives of transforming Turkey into an Islam republic and of creating a New Islamic World Order. In one sermon, he said:
“You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria … like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it … You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey … Until that time, any step taken would be too early—like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all—in confidence … trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here—[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here....

Read it all.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a handy summary of why the MSA is not your average campus group, as you may have suspected by now. "Muslim Student Group a Gateway to Jihad?," by Erick Stakelbeck for CBN News, March 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):
...The MSA bills itself as a resource and support group, a place where Muslim students can network and help grow the association.
Terrorism expert Patrick Poole, however, told CBN News his investigation of the organization shows it's being used for another purpose.
"The Muslim Students Association has been a virtual terror factory," said Poole. "Time after time after time again, we see these terrorists -- and not just fringe members: these are MSA leaders, MSA presidents, MSA national presidents -- who've been implicated, charged and convicted in terrorist plots."
The roll call includes Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda cleric linked to terror plots from Fort Hood to Times Square and beyond.
Awlaki, now a target for assasination by the U.S. government, was president of the MSA at Colorado State University in the mid-1990s.
Then there is Ramy Zamzam. Before his conviction in Pakistan last year for attempting to join the Taliban and kill American troops, Zamzam was president of the MSA's Washington, D.C., council.
Omar Hammami, a leader of the al-Shabaab terrorist group in Somalia, is another MSA alum. He was once president of the group's chapter at the University of South Alabama.
And the list goes on.
Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was national president of the MSA during the 1980s, was al Qaeda's top fundraiser in America and is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence.
Radical Islam Incubator
The MSA is a supposedly "mainstream" group that has long operated on college campuses from coast to coast. Yet a 2007 New York Police Department report identified the organization as an "incubator" for Islamic radicalism.
Former FBI Special Agent John Guandolo told CBN News that the problem can be traced back to the group's roots in the Muslim Brotherhood -- a jihadist movement that seeks to establish Islamic Sharia law worldwide.
"The MSA serves as a recruitment tool to bring Muslims into the Brotherhood," Guandolo said. "Which was its original purpose: to evaluate Muslims and to bring them into the Brotherhood and to recruit non-Muslims into Islam as a dawa entity, giving them the call to Islam."
Guandolo worked on several major terrorism cases for the FBI. He calls the MSA the "focal point" for the Muslim Brotherhood in America.
"Their goal, both from their senior leaders, presidents of MSA's around the country, national leadership, is to implement Islamic government here in the United States," he explained. "And they say that."
Founded in 1963 at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, the MSA quickly spread to other campuses in the Midwest.
"There were really three leaders, three Iraqi guys: Jamal Barzinji, Ahmed Totonji, and Hisam Altalib, who really set it up, who are known, identified Muslim Brotherhood leaders," said Poole. "And from there, MSA became the mother ship of all the Muslim Brotherhood front groups."
Rabidly Anti-Israel
In 2004, the FBI uncovered an internal Muslim Brotherhood document in which a Brotherhood leader identified the MSA as one of "our organizations and the organizations of our friends."
Part of the MSA's on-campus strategy is to aggressively confront pro-Israel speakers.
The Muslim Students Union at the University of California-Irvine, an MSA affiliate, was suspended by the school after members repeatedly heckled Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren during a speech in 2010.

That video and recent coverage can be found here.

Another MSA member endorsed genocide against Jews in May 2010 during an exchange with conservative commentator David Horowitz at the University of California-Davis.
"I am a Jew," Horowitz said. "The head of Hezbollah has said that he hopes that we will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against it?"
"For it," the MSA member answered firmly, in front of a stunned crowd....
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Qur'an-burning (or not burning, and then eventually burning) in Florida was a relative side issue in the broader struggle against the global jihad until it became an issue of double standards concerning the First Amendment right to free speech. After all, if pastor Terry Jones had burned a Bible, or an American flag, most of the world might have taken a momentary glance and gone about its business. Now, he's finally done it, and it is as if most of the mainstream media has gotten the issue out of their collective system; the novelty has worn off, and coverage so far has been quite muted. And the resistance to the jihad goes on, having outlasted this and other stories that only hold the national attention span for so long.

At least one jihadist group has taken notice, though, offering an instructive bit of ranting about "Zionists" and "crusaders," and against free speech. This, by the way, is the same Pakistani paper that suggested the assassination of Shahbaz Bhatti was the work of a vast conspiracy by the U.S., Israel, and India. "Holy Quran desecrated in Florida church," from The Nation, March 22:

Condemning the sacrilegious burning of a copy of the Holy Quran by devilish American pastor Terry Jones, Jamaat-ud-Dawa ameer Hafiz Muhammad Saeed on Monday called it a conspiracy of the zionists and the crusaders working in collusion to disrupt peace and order in the world.
Hafiz Saeed urged the Muslim world to unite against the intense sacrilegious act of the controversial pastor who, he said, acted at the behest of the US government and military. He called upon the government of Pakistan to take the initiative of mobilising all Muslim states to devise a collective strategy on the platform of the OIC.

The Organization of the Islamic Conference itself has expressed its desire for a "legally binding institutional instrument" at the UN to shield Islam from insults.

In a statement, the Dawa chief said the UN Security Council and other international organisations have double standards for Muslims. On the one hand they trumpet religious tolerance and coexistence, but on the other, they turn a blind eye to such blatant extremism. He said Pakistan must not be complacent in the face of such fanaticism carried out under the Obama administration.
Separately, addressing a Jihad Conference in Jamia Masjid, Qadisiya Town, the Dawa chief said America, India and Israel are scared of Jihad. The Muslim must understand that Jihad is the key to their survival.
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The only place that Hizballah is truly compartmentalized in such a way is in the fantasies of Washington officials. The rationale appears to boil down to: "It worked this one time, so let's try it here."

Claiming to pursue "dialogue" -- feel-good term that it is in American politics -- can easily become a cheap way of looking busy and scoring some attractive photo ops. But taking that approach also assumes two parties are communicating with one another as more or less equal participants (does Hizballah deserve that?) and in good faith (are we gullible enough to trust them?).

"Report: U.S. considering strategic outreach to Hezbollah," from Haaretz, March 21 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama is considering reaching out to the political elements in Hezbollah, the Washington Post reported on Friday, stressing that the at this stage it was an intelligence effort, not a policymaking one.
In an opinion piece appearing on the newspaper's online edition, columnist David Ignatius indicated that Washington was considering an effort similar to the one the U.K, implemented "during the 1990s with Sinn Fein, the legal political wing of the terrorist Irish Republican Army."
"That outreach led to breakthrough peace talks and settlement of a conflict that had been raging for more than a century," Ignatius wrote, adding that several U.S. officials were expected to endorse dialogue with political elements of both Hezbollah and the Taliban in an upcoming intelligence report.

Again: assuming compartmentalization where there is none. They will be played for fools.

Writing of the effect recent Mideast turmoil may have had on Obama's decision to accept these recommendations, the Washington Post writer said that the "political time bomb ticking away in the [intelligence report] is the question of whether the United States should seek some kind of direct or indirect engagement with Hezbollah — at least with its political wing."
"Officials who support this course argue that the organization is like the IRA or the PLO — with nonmilitary components that can be drawn into a dialogue," Ignatius added.
Ignatius quotes in his article one intelligence official, John Brennan, known for supporting a move toward dialogue with the Lebanese militant group, as saying that while "Hezbollah started out as purely a terrorist organization back in the early ’80s," it has "evolved significantly over time."

It has gotten better organized and stronger. The armed jihadist mission remains central to Hizballah's nature.

"The bottom line," the Washington Post article concluded, "is that after a decade of American wars in the Middle East, the Obama administration is increasingly looking for ways to talk with adversaries and draw them into a process of dialogue."
"The world is changing, and perhaps so should U.S. policy," he added.
| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 21, 2011

The prize they sought to protect in any future revision was Article 2 of the current constitution, which reads: "Islam is the religion of the state. Arabic is its official language, and the principal source of legislation is Islamic jurisprudence (Sharia)." That, of course, enshrines the second-class status of non-Muslims in the constitution itself. Railroading the referendum through as quickly as possible favored the former ruling party and Muslim Brotherhood by not allowing opposition groups the chance to organize, campaign, and be heard. And the deck has been stacked from the beginning. In February, it was reported:

"The committee appointed by the army to amend certain articles of the Constitution includes a Brotherhood-affiliated lawyer, and a Coptic rights group has argued that Christians are under-represented on it."

More on this story. "Egyptian Constitutional Referendum Passes Amid Reports of Voting Irregularities," by Mary Abdelmassih for the Assyrian International News Agency, March 21:

(AINA) -- Over 18 million Egyptians cast their ballots on March 19 in a referendum on a controversial package of constitutional amendments to nine articles from the previous Constitution. According to the Election Commission, 77 percent of the voters (14 million) voted in favor of the referendum, 22.8 voted against. There were reports of election rigging by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), the Salafists and former members of the Mubarak's National Democratic Party (NDP).
"This result came as a shock to those who wanted the amendments defeated," said Coptic activist Wagih Yacoub. "The youth movement, figures such as Presidential candidates Amr Moussa, the outgoing Arab League chief and Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei, liberals and Copts opposed the referendum, while the army, the NDP and the Islamic movements supported it."
The amendments changed the rules for the qualifications for the office of the president, the period of the presidency, as well as the office of the vice-president. The rules for the judicial supervision of elections, State of emergency and terrorism were also amended. But opposition figures said this would still make the president "another Pharaoh," and open the way for a quick election by September, which would benefit the MB and NDP, who are established political parties which can quickly mobilize resources and field candidates.
Manar Mohsen, who was a poll monitor for the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights, said that Islamic groups claimed that voting yes is a "religious duty" and were telling voters they should vote yes to keep Article Two of the constitution, which states that Sharia is the principal source of Egyptian law.
"They also told voters to approve the amendments if they wanted to keep Coptic Christians out of government," Mohsen said.
Dr. Naguib Gobraeel, head of the Egyptian Union of Human Rights Organizations, said the "The situation is a tragedy." He said his organization received 39 complaints of voting irregularities by mid-morning on referendum day, and called on people to report rigging incidents to him so that he would present it to the office of the Attorney General on Monday. This video appears to show a polling station official marking empty ballots with "yes."
Dr. Gobraeel said that he himself was subjected to such an incident in Shubra district of Cairo, where he went to cast his vote. "After I filled the ballot, the official there asked me to put it in a certain box, I refused and threw it inside the box I chose. As I was about to leave I saw that the official was opening the box and had my balloting ticket in his hand. The team of activists who accompanied me quickly went and caught him. The supervising judge intervened only because the team took photos of that official caught red-handed."
EUHRO is an approved NGO and had over 200 election monitors at polling stations. EUHRO reports in many polling stations ballots did not have the required official stamp; illiterate voters were taken advantage of by being directed to cross yes when they wanted to vote no. Many stations had a section for Copts and another for Muslims for no obvious reason. In areas of heavy Coptic presence, the polling stations opened late or the number of stations was reduced so that not all Copts would be able to vote before closing time. The Copts in Abu Heness, numbering 20,000, had only three voting stations. Also a Muslim election judge mocked the Copts by saying "Your church told you to vote no."

Meanwhile, as reported below, mosque loudspeakers were used to order people to vote "yes."

Mr. Hany elGezeiry, of the Million Center NGO, said in some areas of Cairo polling stations were excellent. However, in poor areas, people's poverty was taken advantage of to influence their votes. The NDP bought votes while the Muslim Brotherhood gave those who voted yes one kilo of fresh meat. He said in the city of Zagazig, 47 miles north-northeast of Cairo, food and money were paid by Islamist if they voters voted yes.
Activist Sarwat Milad said Copts participated in the Referendum to achieve equality of citizenship while the Muslim Brotherhood participated to take over Power. "The MB did not start the January 25 Revolution but wants to steal its fruits. They joined forces with the NDP against the people of the Tahrir Revolution."
The TV program Inside Egypt Today reported that mosques claimed that Christians want to make Egypt a Christian country and want the removal of the 2nd Article.of the Constitution.
Bishop Kirollos of Nag Hammadi said ballot boxes in a school in Bahgourah, a town affiliated to the Bishopric of Nag Hammadi, were opened. A staff member of the school discovered many no ballots which had been torn. The staff member collected the ballots and brought them to the Bishop as proof of rigging of the referendum.
The Bishop also said that polling station of the village of Shusha in Abu Tisht had been closed all day yesterday and did not open until six o'clock in the evening, which prevented many of the Copts from voting. He said, that mosque speakers were warning people not to vote no.
In some areas voters managed to force Imams to remove their religious propaganda for the yes vote. The leftist Tagammu party in Qena filed a report with prosecution accusing the Muslim Brotherhood of trying to influence voters as they entered the polling station in Qos to vote yes and of inciting Muslims against the Copts by claiming that Copts will vote no because they want to change the second article of the constitution.
ElYoum7 daily reported that thousands of protesters are presently congregating in Tahrir Square. The protesters are refusing to recognize the results of the referendum, and are expressing anger by holding slogans, casting doubt on the integrity of the referendum.
Some political entities have called for a protest against the constitutional amendments to be staged in Tahrir Square on Friday, March 25.
| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He is still choosing his words carefully, and still essentially saying he approves of the no-fly zone, but not so much the enforcement of it. Only now, he is limiting his remarks only to his approval of the no-fly-zone.

It may indeed be the case that he is altering his remarks based on the intended audience. Yesterday, the British Foreign Office "said Moussa claimed he had been misquoted, or had put his criticism more strongly in Arabic than in English." Apparently, in English at least, all is well for now. "Arab League chief: We respect UN resolution on Libya military action," from Reuters, March 21 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Arab League chief Amr Moussa said on Monday that he respected a UN resolution that authorized military action on Libya, after earlier comments suggested he was concerned by actions taken by Western powers.
"The Arab League position on Libya was decisive and from the first moment we froze membership of Libya ... Then we asked the United Nations to implement a no-fly zone," he told a news conference with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
"We respect the UN resolution and there is no conflict with it, especially as it indicated there would be no invasion but that it would protect civilians from what they are subject to in Benghazi," he said.
The UN-mandated intervention to protect civilians caught up in a one-month-old revolt against Muammar Gadhafi had drawn comments from Moussa on Sunday suggesting he questioned the need for a heavy bombardment that he said had killed many civilians.
"It is for protecting civilians and that is what we care about," Moussa said, speaking at Arab League headquarters in Cairo.
Western powers launched a second wave of air strikes on Libya early on Monday after halting the advance of Gaddafi's forces on Benghazi and targeting air defenses to let their planes patrol the skies over the North African state.
"We will continue to work on the protection of civilians. We urge everybody to take this into consideration in any military action," Moussa said....
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Human rights activists and ordinary Indonesians are sounding the alarm, warning the country is slowing turning into a Pakistan-style ‘Islamised’ state in which extremist movements sow terror to gain power."

The government's response has been inconsistent, thereby rewarding the pious thugs. Like Pakistan, they have sought to leverage Islamic supremacist sentiment where they find it useful, particularly against Ahmadis and Christians, and have looked the other way from jihadist activity. And they will also find, like Pakistan, that they have created a monster that has grown beyond their willingness or ability to control. More on this story. "Explosive books to set up an Islamic state in Indonesia," by Mathias Hariyadi for Asia News, March 21:

Jakarta (AsiaNews) – Radical Muslim groups are thought to be behind mail bombs recently delivered to prominent figures and security officials, including Christians, in various places in Indonesia. Human rights activists and ordinary Indonesians are sounding the alarm, warning the country is slowing turning into a Pakistan-style ‘Islamised’ state in which extremist movements sow terror to gain power.
Although the authorities have not made any public statement on the matter, many believe that extremist groups are behind a recent spate of attacks involving books containing explosive sent by mail. Inspector Ansyaas Mbai, head of the anti-terror department, blames radical Islamic movements, like Jemaah Islamiyah, the Islamic State of Indonesia and the Mujahedeen Kompak.
The recent bombings were carried out by “old players within the old terror network”, based on their modus operandi and the evidence collected at the sites where attacks occurred, which are “closely related to their (political) ideology,” he said.
The anti-terrorism expert noted that Muslim extremists used similar methods in the past, during sectarian clashes between Christians and Muslims in Poso (central Sulawesi) in 2006.
“The only different thing is the packaging. Now, they use books as bomb cover; in the past torches were commonly used. When the torchlight was set on, the bomb went off,” Mbaai explained.
Targets are another major difference. They include Indonesians seen as close to or puppets in the hands of the Americans and the Israelis.
Targets are labelled “common enemies”, people opposed to the introduction of Sharia, Islamic law, or to the establishment of an Islamic state in Indonesia.

The goal of jihad in all its forms is to impose Islamic law.

The fear is that some Indonesians now favour a Pakistani-styled Islamist shift in which government leaders, officials and security forces become the hostage (if not the target) of terrorist groups.
Last week, terrorists targeted the former chief of police and current anti-drug boss, General Gories Mere, a Catholic. Another would-be victim was former West Java police chief Is Sukandar.
Indonesia’s first radical Muslim group appeared in 1959, a secessionist-oriented group called Darul Islam, whose military wing, the Tentara Islam Indonesia, launched a guerrilla campaign against the government of then President Sukarno. Their goal was the creation of an Islamic state....
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mugged by reality into opposing the multiculturalism that is aiding the Islamization of the Netherlands. "Harrassed [sic] Gay Couple Takes Mayor to Court," from NIS News, March 22 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

UTRECHT, 22/03/11 - A gay couple from Utrecht is holding the municipality, the police and central government liable for the financial and emotional damage they suffered as a result of intimidation and violence of Moroccan youths.

The couple have made official police reports to the Utrecht police eight times in the past years. On no single occasion was a suspect arrested. Meanwhile, the two men have moved to another municipality.

The men are holding the municipality, the police and the State liable. They want to force a damages settlement from the three bodies via civil proceedings. In separate proceedings, they also want to compel judges to force the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM) to prosecute the perpetrators.

Between the summer of 2009 and 2010, the men were continually intimidated. Windows of their house were broken and their car was damaged. Because police there said they could not take action against this, the men eventually found themselves forced to sell their home at way below its estimated value.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Today's universities are hopeless: ideological agreement is prized far more than academic integrity, which is sorely lacking. And this story shows that academic integrity is by no means the most important thing that is lacking. "University Downplays Student's Jihad Threat," from Fox News Radio, March 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Montreal police are investigating a student who made threats against a conservative club at McGill University, even though university officials determined the student’s threats about jihad and wanting to “shoot everyone in the room” were harmless.

A spokesman for the Montreal Police Service told the Toronto Star they take the threat allegedly made by Haaris Khan seriously.

Khan attended a viewing of the documentary “Indoctrinate-U,” sponsored by Conservative McGill, a student organization affiliated with Canada’s Conservative Party. During the viewing, Khan is accused of making death treats using his Twitter account.

“I should have brought an M16,” he allegedly wrote. “I’m watching a Zionist/Conservative propaganda film at a secret Zionist convention, in case anyone’s confused.”

“Indoctrinate-U” is a documentary exposing political correctness on university and college campuses. It explores free speech issues on campuses and how schools sometimes punish people for what the filmmaker calls “mild speech.”

“My blood is boiling,” Khan allegedly tweeted. “I want to shoot everyone in this room.”

The following day, he allegedly tweeted, “The jihad begins today.”

Alexandre Meterissian, a member of the conservative organization, filed a complaint with campus security.

“I found it really disturbing that he would write those kinds of things,” Meterissian told Fox News Radio. “Those kinds of things are serious. It’s not funny. You have to be held liable for what you say on the Internet.”

Khan’s only comments on the incident were published in the student newspaper, the McGill Tribune.

“Whatever comes into my mind, I say it on Twitter,” he told the newspaper. “It’s kind of my outlet.

Khan apologized and said his tweets had been taken out of context, noting that he did not own a gun and he was not particularly religious.

Meterissian said he was more upset over the university’s response.

“The university really hasn’t been taking this seriously,” he said. “They didn’t deem it a big enough threat to inform the students or even consider suspending or expelling the student.”...

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The convoluted, Rube Goldberg-worthy process described below, which affords preferential treatment to those who invoke Sharia, lends itself to any number of foreseeable abuses. Here is one. "Islamic law used to dodge stamp duty," from the Daily Express, March 21 (thanks to Twostellas):

Sharia law is being used by house buyers posing as Muslims to dodge stamp duty, it was revealed yesterday.
A scheme, brought in by Labour in 2005, allows followers of Islam to buy property without paying the tax.
Paying interest is banned under Sharia law, so Muslims are allowed to buy a house and then sell it on to an offshore financial company.
They then lease the house from the company instead of taking out a mortgage, which would include interest payments. Stamp duty, which is applicable to all properties worth £125,000 and over, does not have to be paid on properties which are immediately sold on.
But the loophole, which costs the Treasury £40million a year, is now being used by some who pretend to be Muslim.
Sultan Choudhury, from the UK Islamic Finance Secretariat, said: “It was certainly not envisaged that some tax advisers would manipulate the legislation on behalf of their clients to avoid paying stamp duty at all.”
| 60 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not exactly what James Hetfield and Co. were going for with Master of Puppets. "FPI sets its eyes on underground music," by Irawaty Wardani for the Jakarta Post, March 21:
Hot on the heels of its campaign against the dissolution of Ahmadiyah, the hard-line Muslim group Islam Defenders Front (FPI) is now setting its eyes on underground music, which its members believe carry messages that would lead young Muslims astray.
In a public lecture at the FPI headquarters in Petamburan, Central Jakarta, senior FPI member and purported Islamic music “expert” Farid Budi Fahri alleged there had been concerted efforts to turn young people away from Islamic teachings through a variety of underground music.
“There has been a conspiracy. A war launched by the underground community [against mainstream Islamic teaching],” he told FPI members who came to the talk last week.
Farid traced the roots of the underground music to a Zionist movement.
He said that a group of people adhering to Zionist ideology has used the medium to conceal their objectives of world domination.
“At the end of the day, it will sow conflict among Muslims themselves,” Farid said.
He went on to speculate that the underground music community, which initially developed as a resistance towards the mainstream industry by independently producing and distributing music, has been subverted by the Zionist movement to spread ideas that would contradict Islam.
“Are these musicians carrying out a Zionist mission? I would say no. The conspiracy is within the music, the lyrics which carry messages and the ideology which would create a lifestyle and counter culture in the end,” Farid said.
He cited the lyrics of John Lennon’s song Imagine as Zionist music, although Lennon was not Jewish and was not considered an idol of the underground music community.
“People keep singing his songs without realizing the meaning behind it,” he said.
He suspected that the song — about a hypothetical state of the world where religion, state and ideology did not exist — carry a pure Zionist message.
Farid also said some underground musical outfits had promoted Satanic messages. He said bands like Sepultura, Metallica and Lamb of God were satanic bands that could turn young Muslim fans away from religion.
The FPI has thus far tried to extend efforts to reach out to punk communities in the city to spread the message of Islam.
“So far we have tried to approach punk communities in Pulo Gadung and Blok M bus terminals so that they can return to the true Islamic teachings,” Farid said.
He said FPI would soon expand its anti-underground initiatives.
“We expect that we can be done with the Ahmadiyah case soon so that FPI can concentrate on other issues like dealing with heresy that is rampant in the underground community,” Farid said....
| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One will recall that the recent wave of moves to ban Ahmadis from the public practice of their religion and even identifying themselves as Ahmadis began with the savage murder of three members of the sect.

Authorities, who regard them as a heretical Islamic sect, essentially blamed the victim for causing trouble by existing. And so the allegedly modern, moderate, tolerant Indonesia continues its slow purge of the group. "Demands to ban Ahmadiyah flare across archipelago," by Slamet Susanto and Jon Afrizal for the Jakarta Post, March 21:

Demands to ban Ahmadiyah have increased in a number of regions amid recent calls from some US congressmen asking the Indonesian government to revoke laws that discriminate against the Islamic sect.
In Yogyakarta, some 300 people from different Muslim organizations grouped under the Islamic Peoples’ Front (FUI) staged a rally on Sunday demanding the provincial administration ban Ahmadiyah in the province.
Riding on motorcycles, the protesters traversed the main streets of Yogyakarta — a city that has long been respected for tolerance. The demonstrators reportedly shouted anti-Ahmadiyah sentiments in a rally that was said to be orderly and peaceful.
“Please remember Islam teaches peace. So don’t become easily provoked by the enemies of Islam by contributing to anarchy. March in two rows so you won’t disrupt the traffic,” protest coordinator Abu Almer told participants.
The protesters expressed support for the Indonesian Ulema Council’s (MUI) edict declaring that Ahmadiyah must be disbanded because of heresy and blasphemy against Islam. “Ahmadiyah must be disbanded unless they no longer use the name and symbols of Islam,” Abu Almer said.
The group also urged the provincial administration to implement the joint ministerial decree on banning Ahmadiyah activities and to issue a bylaw banning the sect.
The group symbolically closed the Ahmadiyah office in Kotabaru by attaching a piece of cloth with the word “sealed”. “This is a symbol of our demand,” Abu Almer said.
Yogyakarta Governor Sri Sultan Hamengkubuwono X has repeatedly said he would not issue a special bylaw to ban Ahmadiyah, arguing that the province was peaceful and tolerant and that the authority to ban the sect lays with the central government.
In Padang, West Sumatra, Governor Irwan Prayitno said that he was ready to issue a gubernatorial regulation banning Ahmadiyah activities in the province within two days.
Irwan also said his administration would try to send a letter to the President urging a ban of Ahmadiyah since regional administrations could only ban the sect’s activities.
“In other countries such as Pakistan and Malaysia, Ahmadiyah has become a cult and not a part of Islam,” Irwan told a Cult Surveillance Coordinating Agency (Bakorpakem) forum on Friday evening.
In Palu, Central Sulawesi, the provincial branch of MUI also expressed support for the ban of Ahmadiyah activities. “Ahmadiyah is heretical because it has turned away from Islamic teachings,” MUI branch chairman Saggaf Aldjufri said, as quoted by Antara news agency on Saturday.
Central Sulawesi Governor H.B. Paliudju has previously called on local Ahmadis to return to Islamic instruction and not influence other Muslims with their teaching.
“I call on Ahmadis to temporarily stop their activities until further decision is made by the central government regarding the existence of Ahmadiyah in the country,” the governor said....
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story mentions the Boko Haram ("Western education is sin") sect, but does not tie this attack to them directly. Perhaps this one was the work of "Reading the Manual is Sin."

In all seriousness, though, this story demonstrates that jihadist attacks on churches are continuing in Nigeria, and they will certainly try again. "Two Killed in Explosion Outside Church in Jos. Nigeria," by Sam Olukoya for Bloomberg, March 20 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Two people were killed in a bomb blast outside the ECWA Church, Nasarawa Gwom in Jos, a city in Nigeria’s Plateau state, a region beset in recent months by sectarian violence, a government official said.
“We suspect the two men were trying to plant a bomb outside the church while Sunday service was on when the bomb exploded, killing both of them,” Gregory Yenlong, the Plateau State commissioner for information in a telephone interview. “A major tragedy was aborted today, because there was a very large congregation.”
More than 200 people have died in reprisal attacks by Christian and Muslim groups in the Plateau region, according to New York-based Human Rights Watch, since multiple bomb blasts in Jos city on Christmas Eve killed 80 people. A radical Islamic sect known as Boko Haram, or “Western education is a sin,” claimed responsibility for the explosions....
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"It was reported by a professor that he wrote some blasphemous remarks in the answer sheets of Physics and Islamic Studies papers."

And so authorities threw the book at Syed Samiullah, complete with recourse to a handwriting expert and psychiatric evaluations. The latter may save him from the blasphemy laws' death sentence, but mark him for the rest of his life as "mentally ill" at only 17. An update on this story. "Blasphemy suspect’s trial to start on 29th," by Ishaq Tanoli for Dawn, March 20:

KARACHI, March 19: A judicial magistrate on Saturday treated an interim charge-sheet filed against a teenage blasphemy suspect as the final one and sent it to the district and sessions court (east) for trial, which will commence on March 29.
The court had granted two opportunities to the investigation officer of the case, but he failed to submit the final charge-sheet.
The suspect, Syed Samiullah, has been booked in a case pertaining to allegedly making some blasphemous remarks in answer sheets of his intermediate examination in April last year.
The investigation officer of the case, Additional Superintendent of Police Misal Khan, submitted the interim charge-sheet under Section 173 of the criminal procedure code in court on March 10.
The IO sought more time to file a final charge-sheet as reports of a handwriting expert and a medical examination to determine the suspect’s mental condition had not yet been received. The magistrate allowed his plea and granted four more days. [...]
The suspect is likely to be indicted by a sessions court on March 29.
According to the interim charge-sheet, the controller of examination of the Board of Intermediate Education, Karachi (BIEK) in his written complaint stated that the suspect appeared in the first year science group annual examination 2010 and it was reported by a professor that he wrote some blasphemous remarks in the answer sheets of Physics and Islamic Studies papers.

CSI Karachi:

It stated that a writing sample from the suspect was collected in court and sent it to the handwriting expert along with the copies of the answer sheets for an analysis. An initial medical examination of the suspect was conducted in the psychiatry ward of the Civil Hospital Karachi since one of his uncles said that the suspect was mentally ill, it added.
The IO further stated in the interim charge-sheet that he also made a request to the court concerned for shifting of the suspect from prison to a hospital for his proper medical examination.
He placed 16 prosecution witnesses in the interim-charge-sheet.
The 17-year-old suspect was picked up by the police from his Malir residence on Jan 28.
A case (FIR 165/2011) was registered against the suspect under Section 295-C (use of derogatory remarks in respect of the Holy Prophet) of the Pakistan Penal Code at the Sharea Faisal police station....
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The amendments in Egypt's referendum were "meant to amend the current Constitution just enough to allow fair elections before a new document is written." What they did not begin to touch, not surprisingly, was Article 2 of the current Egyptian constitution, which reads: "Islam is the religion of the state. Arabic is its official language, and the principal source of legislation is Islamic jurisprudence (Sharia)." As one Coptic Christian rightly noted in a march demanding a secular government in February, "This provision is the source of discrimination in Egypt."

Almost no one in the West dares admit that; it is an article of politically correct faith that it is interpretations or implementations of Sharia that are problematic, but not Sharia itself. Non-Muslims will continue to suffer as a result. More on this story. "How Egypt's historic referendum could now bolster Islamists," by Kristen Chick for the Christian Science Monitor, March 20:

Egyptians voted overwhelmingly in favor of proposed constitutional amendments Saturday, paving the way for parliamentary and presidential elections to be held within months.
Final results announced Sunday show that 77.2 percent of voters backed the changes in what was the freest vote in Egypt in more than half a century, despite reported irregularities.
The outcome sets the stage for a quick transition to a new government, as advocated by the military council that's been ruling Egypt since former President Hosni Mubarak was toppled by popular protests last month. But the truncated timeline means the new parties emerging in Egypt after decades of oppression could struggle to organize in time to find success in the elections. And opponents of the amendments say that the result gives unfair advantage to the two political groups that gained the deepest roots during Mr. Mubarak's regime: the Muslim Brotherhood and the former ruling National Democratic Party.
The vote is disappointing for Egyptian Christians, who had campaigned against the amendments, and could further strain sectarian tensions. They worried that a yes vote would allow the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists to gain a strong position in the coming parliament. The Muslim Brotherhood made a large effort to mobilize voters to cast ballots in support of the amendments.
Emad Gad, an analyst at the Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, says Islamist factions will likely do well when parliamentary elections are held. “We can deal with this option if they will continue in power for four years only,” he says. “The main problem here is the next parliament will write the next Constitution. So then the fanatics and the Muslim Brotherhood will govern us for decades.”
The approved amendments, meant to amend the current Constitution just enough to allow fair elections before a new document is written, will limit the president to two four-year terms, force him to appoint a vice president, and curb his power to rule by emergency law. Opponents had argued that the changes don’t go far enough, and wanted a completely new Constitution before any elections were held.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The message: Thanks for all your help. Now, get out of our way. "Hundreds of Islamists stone Egypt's ElBaradei," by Mona Salem for Agence France-Presse, March 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

CAIRO — Islamists hurled stones and shoes at Mohamed ElBaradei, Nobel Peace laureate and a secular contender for Egypt's presidency, as he tried to vote Saturday in a referendum on constitutional amendments.
ElBaradei was hit in the back by a stone thrown from the crowd of hundreds but managed to escape unhurt and slammed as "irresponsible" the holding of a referendum without adequate law and order.
"We don't want you," the mob shouted, throwing stones, shoes and water at the former UN nuclear watchdog chief as he turned up at a Cairo polling station, five weeks after president Hosni Mubarak was ousted by mass protests.
"He lives in the United States and wants to rule us. It's out of the question," one of them said.
"We don't want an American agent," said another.
ElBaradei beat a retreat to his car and left without voting at the polling station in Muqattam, a largely poor district in south Cairo.
"Went 2 vote w family attacked by organized thugs. Car smashed w rocks. Holding referendum in absence of law & order is an irresponsible act," he wrote on Twitter.
ElBaradei's brother Ali said he was unhurt. Muqattam is close to the scene of recent deadly clashes between Egypt's Christian Copt community and Muslims.
Members of the crowd interviewed by AFP before the assault identified themselves as Islamists without elaborating on their precise allegiance.
An official from the Muslim Brotherhood, the largest and most organised opposition movement, denied members of his group were involved....
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 20, 2011

They're going to tear down this building anyway, so what do they care about damage to its facade? This is just another Islamic supremacist attempt to bleed the kuffar. "Suit over Burlington 'damage' to GZ mosque site," by Dareh Gregorian for the New York Post, March 20 (thanks to Her Royal Whyness):

The Burlington Coat Factory was in such a hurry to distance itself from a former storefront that’s now a highly controversial proposed mosque near Ground Zero that it severely damaged the building when it ripped its old signs off, the property owners charge.

In papers filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, 45 Park Place Partners and 51 Park Place LH LLC say the chain’s “animus and hostility to the inclusion of the mosque in the development plans of the building” resulted in the company “illegally and forcefully” removing its massive signs, destroying the owners’ property and causing them “economic injury.”

The suit seeks a total of $4.1 million in damages.

A rep for Burlington Coat Factory declined comment....

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Had Western powers done nothing, they would have been accused of sitting idly by, indifferent to the suffering of a Muslim population. Having done something, they are accused of doing too much, and chances are good that at some point, calls for revenge over the supposedly "indiscriminate" loss of Muslim life will then be converted into a reason for more "defensive jihad" -- which is ultimately jihad waiting for an excuse.

In all of this, the sense of entitlement of Amr Moussa and the Arab League to order around other nations to do its dirty work -- and take the flak, in all senses of the word, for the military intervention -- is staggering. One is reminded of the appalling remarks attributed to King Fahd in 1993:

"I summon my blue-eyed slaves anytime it pleases me. I command the Americans to send me their bravest soldiers to die for me. Anytime I clap my hands a stupid genie called the American ambassador appears to do my bidding. When the Americans die in my service their bodies are frozen in metal boxes by the US Embassy and American airplanes carry them away, as if they never existed. Truly, America is my favorite slave."

That seems to be more or less the attitude at work here. The word out of the British Foreign Office about Amr Moussa is not surprising, though, combining two tactics we see a great deal of: complaining that controversial comments have been misquoted, and claiming something fell through the cracks on the way between Arabic and English.

An update on this story. "Gaddafi may become target of air strikes, Liam Fox admits," by Patrick Wintour and Ewen McAskill for The Guardian, March 20:

America, France and Britain – the leaders of the coalition's air attacks on Libya – were struggling to maintain international support for their actions, as they faced stinging criticism about mission creep from the leader of the Arab League, as well as from China and Russia.
Critics claimed that the coalition of the willing may have been acting disproportionately and had come perilously close to making Gaddafi's departure an explicit goal of UN policy.
Russia, which abstained on the UN vote last week, called for "an end to indiscriminate force".
Despite denials from coalition forces, Alexander Lukashevich, Russia's foreign ministry spokesman, said that the coalition had hit non-military targets.
He suggested that 48 civilians had been killed. "We believe a mandate given by the UN security council resolution – a controversial move in itself – should not be used to achieve goals outside its provisions, which only see measures necessary to protect civilian population," he said.
The Arab League secretary general, Amr Moussa, also startled western governments when he denounced the air attacks only a week after the league had called for creation of a no-fly zone.
Moussa, who is a candidate for the Egyptian presidency, said: "What has happened in Libya differs from the goal of imposing a no-fly zone and what we want is the protection of civilians and not bombing other civilians."
The Foreign Office later said Moussa claimed he had been misquoted, or had put his criticism more strongly in Arabic than in English. "We will continue to work with our Arab partners to enforce the resolution for the good of the Libyan people," the FO said.
The Arab League had, though, been called to an emergency session to discuss the scale of the attacks.
The British defence secretary, Liam Fox, said the scale was in line with UN resolutions that had been "essential in terms of the Gaddafi regime's ability to prosecute attacks on their own people". He also said it was possible that Gaddafi himself could become a target of air attacks if the safety of civilians could be guaranteed.
Ahead of a Commons debate and vote tomorrow, leading figures in David Cameron's cabinet were under pressure to clarify whether the explicit purpose of the attacks was to render Gaddafi's regime so powerless that it collapses.
Speaking on the Politics Show, Fox said: "Mission accomplished would mean the Libyan people free to control their own destiny. This is very clear – the international community wants his regime to end and wants the Libyan people to control for themselves their own country."
He then added: "Regime change is not an objective, but it may come about as a result of what is happening amongst the people of Libya."...
| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Secular democracy on the march. An update on this story. "Egyptians Voters Approve Constitutional Changes," by Neil MacFarquhar for the New York Times, March 20 (thanks to Barbara):

CAIRO, Egypt — Egyptian voters overwhelming approved a referendum on constitutional changes that will usher in rapid elections, with the results announced Sunday underscoring the strength of established political organizations and the weakness of the nascent liberal groups.

More than 14.1 million voters approved the constitutional amendments while 4 million voted against them. The turnout of 41 percent among the 45 million eligible voters broke all records for recent elections, according to the Egyptian government....

President Hosni Mubarak was forced from power last month, 18 days after demonstrations began on Jan 25 against his nearly three decades in power. The result of the referendum paves the way for early legislative elections in June and a presidential race in August. That is the rapid timetable that the ruling military council had sought in order to insure its own speedy exit from running the country.

The Muslim Brotherhood and remnant elements of the National Democratic Party, which dominated Egyptian politics for decades, were the main supporters of the referendum. They said their position was to insure the swift return to civilian rule.

The liberal wing of Egyptian politics was heavily against the measure, saying they did not have enough time to organize into effective political organizations. They said early elections will benefit the brotherhood and the old ruling party, mean their dominance of the next parliament will mean it will write a constitution much like the old one....

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Is Wendell Marsh of Reuters clueless, or complicit?

"Islam is all-American for one U.S. Muslim leader," by Wendell Marsh for Reuters, March 20:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - - Al Azhar, the centuries-old center of Islamic learning in Cairo, is a world away from Oklahoma City where William Suhaib Webb grew up.

But it was not until the American Muslim leader immersed himself in Islamic studies at Al Azhar that he realized just how American he was, regardless of his religion.

"I didn't really have enough comfort as a young convert to really be who I was ... I adopted different cultural constructs that I had not grown up with," he told Reuters in a telephone interview from Santa Clara, California, where he is an imam at a mosque and runs a website aimed at Muslim youth.

Named in 2010 by an Islamic think-tank as one of the 500 "Most Influential Muslims in the World" for his work with youth over the last decade, Webb is now arguably the kind of moderate Islamic leader Congressman Peter King said the country needs when he chaired hearings on Muslim militancy this month.

Webb's positions on issues such as women's rights and religious community involvement are near the American mainstream. He denounces violence in the name of Islam, and encourages U.S. Muslim youth to be comfortable with their American roots....

The Reuters story never mentions it, but Suhaib Webb is actually affiliated with the Muslim American Society.

And what is the Muslim American Society? The Muslim Brotherhood. "In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004, via the Muslim Brotherhood's English-language website, Ikhwanweb.

The Muslim Brothers "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

Imagine if a Jewish or Christian leader was affiliated with a group that was, according to one of its own documents, dedicated to "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house" so that Jewish or Christian law would replace the U.S. Constitution. Would Wendell Marsh of Reuters be writing a glowing puff piece about the moderation and wisdom of such a leader?

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday, Marisol wrote: "Tomorrow, or soon, they will pillory us again as the 'world's policeman.'" And here we are. These strikes against Libya are disastrously wrongheaded and play into the hands of Islamic supremacists, but that doesn't stop the Arab League from using them to play the victim card and try to stir up a little defensive jihad.

"Arab League criticizes allied airstrikes on Libya," from AP, March 20 (thanks to JCB):

CAIRO – The head of the Arab League has criticized international strikes on Libya, saying they caused civilian deaths.

The Arab League's support for a no-fly zone last week helped overcome reluctance in the West for action in Libya. The U.N. authorized not only a no-fly zone but also "all necessary measures" to protect civilians.

Amr Moussa says the military operations have gone beyond what the Arab League backed.

Moussa has told reporters Sunday that "what happened differs from the no-fly zone objectives." He says "what we want is civilians' protection not shelling more civilians."...

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will the Muslim spokesmen in the West who insist on pain of charges of "Islamophobia" that we all must believe that Islam is tolerant condemn this action by the Islamic Republic?

I didn't think so.

Islamic Tolerance Alert from the Islamic Republic of Iran: "Iran arrests Bahai followers for proselytising faith," from Reuters, March 15 (thanks to Daniel):

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iran’s Intelligence Ministry has arrested a number of adherents of the Bahai religious minority for proselytising their faith in schools, student news agency ISNA reported on Saturday quoting a court official.

The arrests were the outcome of nine months of undercover investigation in the capital Tehran and the city of Bam, in south-eastern Iran, said Mohammad Reza Sanjari, the prosecutor-general of the revolutionary court in Bam.

He did not indicate how many and when the arrests were made.

“The investigation indicated the existence of a wide and intricate network, members of which undertook measures at the order of a central organisation,” he said.

Sanjari said the adherents of Bahai, which Shi’ites consider a heretical offshoot of Islam, took advantage of a powerful earthquake that rocked Bam in 2003 killing thousands and destroying 70 to 90 percent of homes and schools. Bam is 610 miles southeast of Tehran.

“The abuse by the Bahai organisation of the 2003 post-earthquake in the city of Bam, which was in need of cultural, social and educational measures is very obvious,” he said....

Exiled Bahai leaders say hundreds of followers have been jailed and executed since the 1979 Islamic Shi’ite revolution. The Iranian government denies it has detained or executed people for their religious beliefs.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"It is widely assumed that quick elections would give an advantage to the well-established Muslim Brotherhood." I tried to tell you.

"Many Egypt Christians vote 'no', fearing Islamists," by Sarah Mikhail for Reuters, March 20:

CAIRO (Reuters) - Many Egyptian Christians say they voted on Saturday to reject proposed constitutional amendments in a referendum because they fear hasty elections to follow may open the door for Islamist groups to rise to power.

If the amendments are approved, parliamentary elections will take place in late September followed by presidential elections in December, giving scant time for new parties to organise, including ones representing the aspirations of Christians.

Foremost among these aspirations is the creation of a civil state where religion is not a basis for legislation.

It is widely assumed that quick elections would give an advantage to the well-established Muslim Brotherhood, a group founded in the 1920s which has emerged as the best organised political force since Hosni Mubarak was toppled from power.

"I fear the Islamists because they speak in civil slogans that have a religious context, like when one said he believed in a civil Egypt but at the same time no woman or Copt should run for president," said Samuel Wahba, a Coptic doctor....

Coptic Christians also want the new constitution to do away with Article 2, which says Islam is the religion of the state and Islamic jurisprudence the main source of legislation -- a point of tension with Islamists....

"I see we should say 'no', because such amendments are not valid to build a modern civil state. That isn't our opinion alone but also that of any moderate Egyptian who wants a civil state," said Father Metyas, a priest in a Coptic Orthodox Church.

"Anyone is free in one's opinion, but our role as those responsible for enlightenment is to tell people that these amendments serve the Brotherhood's ideology," he said.

Egyptians took pride in the Christian-Muslim solidarity displayed during the revolution that toppled Mubarak on February 11 and hoped the uprising had buried tensions that have flared up with increasing regularity in recent years.

But these feelings were dampened in March after an interfaith romance sparked the torching of a church by Islamists, which led to sectarian clashes leaving 13 people killed.

Copts staged an unprecedented sit-in for nine days in front of the state's television building demanding the destroyed church be rebuilt. Some Muslims also joined in.

"I voted 'no' because, as an Egyptian, I want a new complete constitution...it's not based on the 'yes' of Islamist groups," said Ramy Kamel, a Coptic lawyer.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadists who murdered the Fogel family are savages, as are those who celebrated their murders in Gaza. I would say this while standing in the middle of Trafalgar Square, and if Britain's PC Commission had any residual sense of shame, it would drop this proceeding immediately.

It is also worth noting, however, that it may have been a lingering politically correct impulse on Phillips' part that played into the hands of the Islamic supremacists who complained about her piece. For she refers to "Arabs" again and again, when the murderers of the Fogels were killing not because they were Arabs, but because they were Muslims, and Islamic jihadists. So many Western analysts will call jihadists anything -- anything -- so as to avoid calling them what they are, devout and observant Muslims. They just can't bear the idea that religious teachings might really have something to do with this conflict. Yet to characterize the Itamar murderers again and again as "Arabs" may have made it easier for the execrable Bunglawala to characterize what she wrote as a "generalised racist outburst." On the other hand, since resistance to jihad violence and Islamic supremacism is routinely described as "racism" also, if she had referred to the killers as jihadists or Muslims it may not have made any difference.

In any case, note the moral inversion from the complaining Muslims -- a moral inversion that is now so common that we may not even notice it. Bunglawala and the other complainers are full of righteous indignation against Melanie Phillips for her words, but where is the indignation of these supposed "moderates" against the jihadists who murdered the Fogels? Which is worse? Phillips's allegedly "racist" remarks, or the cold-blooded killing of a family sleeping in its home?

And if Bunglawala and co. has issued some pro-forma condemnation, deploring, "Islam forbids..." eyewash, what are they doing to back it up with real action? What programs have they instituted in mosques and Islamic schools in Britain to teach against the beliefs and assumptions that led Muslims to believe that it would be a good and righteous act to murder the Fogels in the first place?

Free Speech Death Watch Alert from Absurd Britannia: "PCC investigates Melanie Phillips' Spectator blog," by John Plunkett in The Guardian, March 18 (thanks to Phil):

A Melanie Phillips blogpost on the Spectator website which referred to the "moral depravity" of Arab "savages" is being investigated by the Press Complaints Commission.

The online comment piece, headlined "Armchair barbarism", focused on media coverage of the murder of five members of a Jewish family in the West Bank settlement of Itamar by Palestinian militants earlier this month.

"The moral depravity of the Arabs is finding a grotesque echo in the moral bankruptcy and worse of the British and American 'liberal' media," wrote Phillips.

"Overwhelmingly, the media have either ignored or downplayed the atrocity – or worse, effectively blamed the victims for bringing it on themselves, describing them as 'hard-line settlers' or extremists.

"To the New York Times, it's not the Arab massacre of a Jewish family which has jeopardised 'peace prospects' – because the Israelis will quite rightly never trust any agreement with such savages – but instead Israeli policy on building more homes, on land to which it is legally and morally entitled, which is responsible instead for making peace elusive. Twisted, and sick."

The column, which also referred to coverage of the murders by CNN, the BBC and the Guardian – part of the group that publishes MediaGuardian.co.uk – prompted two complaints to the press watchdog, one of them from Engage, a group promoting Muslim engagement in British society.

Inayat Bunglawala, chair of Muslims4UK, said: "Her words went far beyond just denouncing the killings. It was a far more generalised racist outburst against Arabs as a whole.

"If you insert the word 'Jew' or 'Jewish' where she has referred to Arabs then I am sure she would have no doubt that those words would be antisemitic. Just as she abhors antisemitism it is important that she maintains the same vigorous anti-racist stance against Arabs. It is just unacceptable to use that kind of language."

Bunglawala said he had also complained to the police about the column....

| 65 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"These revolutions are the will of the people." He seems confident that if the will of the people in Libya and elsewhere does indeed find expression, that what will result will not be pluralistic democracies guaranteeing the rights of their people and friendly toward the West, but Islamic states bristling with hatred for the Great Satan.

Doesn't he know that these are secular, pro-democracy uprisings? Hassan Nasrallah must be some kind of Islamophobe.

"Hezbollah calls on Arab rebels to be patient for regime change," from DPA, March 19:

Beirut - Hezbollah on Saturday called on rebels across the Arab world who are fighting for regime change to be patient and confident of their eventual victory.

'God will grant you victory if you persist in your jihad,' said Hezbollah secretary general Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah during a rally in Beirut's southern suburbs. He referred to the popular uprisings in Bahrain, Yemen and Libya.

'These revolutions are the will of the people. They express awareness, enthusiasm and willingness to sacrifice. This should not be forgotten by the regimes that are facing these people,' Nasrallah said....

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Now, ruling America is a black man from our continent, an African from Arab descent, from Muslim descent, and this is something we never imagined – that from Reagan we would get to Barakeh Obama." -- Muammar Gaddafi, April 2010

Gadhafi, who has ruled Libya for 41 years, said the international action against his forces was unjustified, calling it "simply a colonial crusader aggression that may ignite another large-scale crusader war." -- March 20, 2011

Yet once again we have a military action that will almost certainly aid Islamic supremacist pro-Sharia forces being labeled a "Crusader" action. Eastern Libya, where the anti-Gaddafi forces are based, is a hotbed of anti-Americanism and jihadist sentiment. A report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center reveals that over the last few years, more jihadists per capita entered Iraq from Libya than from any other Muslim country – and most of them came from the region that is now spearheading the revolt against Gaddafi.

They stand to be the most likely beneficiaries of this "Crusade."

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 19, 2011

"Western and Arab allies were coordinating the use of military assets to thwart Gadhafi's offensive."

Curse the infidels -- er, uh, wait: help us out, infidels! Better yet, how about you do it! A major update on this story. Tomorrow, or soon, they will pillory us again as the "world's policeman." "U.S. launches first missiles against Gadhafi forces," from CNN, March 19:

Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- The U.S. military has launched its first missiles in Libya against Moammar Gadhafi's forces, a senior Defense Department official said Saturday.
Earlier, French fighter jets deployed over Libya fired at a military vehicle on Saturday, the country's first strike against Moammar Gadhafi's military forces who earlier attacked the rebel stronghold of Benghazi.
U.S. Tomahawk missiles have landed in the western area around Tripoli and Misrata, the American military official said.
"He's clearly been on the offensive," the official said of Gadhafi. "He said that he was going to do a cease-fire and he continued to move his forces into Benghazi."
The military official said the attacks on Gadhafi's forces will be part of a multiphase approach in a sequential and deliberate manner.
"The U.S. will be at the front end of this, providing the unique capabilities that the U.S has," the official said.
While French jets launched the first attacks on Gadhafi's forces, Americans jets will be part of the enforcement. "When this commences, we'll have American aircraft involved," the official said.
The French Defense Ministry said its attack aircraft being used to take out tanks and artillery have deemed Benghazi and the surrounding area an "exclusion zone."
The French are using surveillance aircraft and two frigates in the operation to protect civilians. The aircraft carrier Charles De Gaulle will soon depart Toulon, France.
"Our air force will oppose any aggression by Colonel Gadhafi against the population of Benghazi," said French President Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking after an international, top-level meeting in Paris over the Libyan crisis.
"As of now, our aircraft are preventing planes from attacking the town," he said, calling the intervention a "grave decision."
The international show of force is much welcomed by besieged rebel forces who have called for backup to help them stave off a government offensive against their positions in Benghazi and other rebel-held enclaves
An opposition spokesman in Benghazi said Gadhafi forces that assaulted the city earlier Saturday are now positioned outside the town. However, the forces are preparing for more attacks.
Western and Arab allies were coordinating the use of military assets to thwart Gadhafi's offensive.
Canada will be one of four principal partners helping to enforce the no-fly zone over Libya. Six Canadian CF-18 fighter jets are en route to an Italian base in Sicily and the HMCS Charlottetown will be in position to help with the naval blockade against Libya.
British officials held a crisis meeting Saturday evening.
The United States continued to broadcast the message that it is a member of, and is assisting, the coalition, rather than taking the lead role.
"America has unique capabilities, and we will bring them to bear to help our European and Canadian allies and Arab partners to stop further violence against civilians including through the effective implementation of a no-fly zone," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.
Sarkozy said Gadhafi still has time to stop its activities. As of Friday, France, Britain, the United States and Arab League nations passed along a warning for Gadhafi to stop his operations immediately....
| 88 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Malaysia_AllahMarch.jpg

That is exactly how Malaysian authorities are proceeding: the content of the Bible is now a controlled substance. Which is easier to score in Malaysia nowadays -- hydrocodone or a shipment of Malay-language Bibles?

Once again, Qur'an 29:46 does say "Our Allah and your Allah is One, and unto Him we surrender," but it is a talking point for Islamic proselytizing, and a one-way line of discourse in a manner in which a non-Muslim would be prohibited from preaching to a Muslim under Islamic law.

The intention of this Islamic supremacist game is twofold: first, as always, there is the general desire to remind unbelievers who's boss. But if Malay-speaking Christians relent and cede their right to the name of God in their own language, it will also make it that much easier for Muslims to portray them as polytheists, creating excuses for further hostility and oppression. "Churches in Malaysia reject Bibles held up and desecrated by the government," by Debra Chong for Asia News, March 17:

KUALA LUMPUR, March 17 — The Christian community said today that it is appalled by what it says is the Najib administration’s desecration of 5,100 holy books shipped in from Indonesia and has flat out refused to collect the Port Klang shipment.
The Christian Federation of Malaysia (CFM), which represents over 90 per cent of churches in the country, insisted that Putrajaya immediately drop the conditions imposed for the release of two shipments of Malay Bibles totalling 35,000 copies seized from Port Klang and Kuching port.
Last night, the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) was told its shipment of 5,100 Alkitab—as the Malay Bibles are called—were stamped with the Home Ministry’s official seal, as per the conditions imposed for the release issued two days ago, without its prior permission.
The first requires the importers to stamp directly on the cover of each of the 35,000 copies the following words: “Peringatan: ‘Al Kitab Berita Baik’ ini untuk kegunaan penganut agama Kristian sahaja. Dengan perintah Menteri Dalam Negeri”
The cover of the Bibles would be stamped with the department’s official seal and dated as well.
The second condition requires the importers to stamp a serial number on each copy as if to demarcate copies from the released shipment and to enable the book to be traced back to the port of import.

Such paranoia makes the faith of Malaysia's Muslim establishment look fragile and weak. The message they send in being so afraid of a book -- of being afraid of the availability of the Bible -- is not one of temporal or spiritual strength.

“This means that the Bahasa Malaysia Bible is now treated as a restricted item, and the Word of God has been made subject to the control of man. This is wholly offensive to Christians,” the CFM said in a strongly worded statement today signed by its chairman, Bishop Ng Moon Hing.
The umbrella body refuted government claims it had reached a compromise, saying it had never agreed that its holy books should be endorsed to say, “It is only for Christians”.
“Any person who respects the Holy Scriptures of any religion would be appalled by this action. We will never accede to any desecration of the Bible since the Word of God to us is sacred,” it said.
Pointing to a 1982 order issued under the Internal Security Act (ISA), the CFM said nowhere in the law is it stated that any form of words had to be endorsed on any copy of the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia. “Given that copies may already have been endorsed, we will not take delivery of those endorsed copies,” it added.
The CFM said it also wholly rejects the federal government’s argument that the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia is “prejudicial to the national interest and security of Malaysia”. It condemned the government’s treatment of its holy books as “subversive publication”.
The CFM said Christian Malaysians have always acted in good faith and with great patience to reach a peaceful end to religious dispute that would not compromise their beliefs. “But that good faith has not been reciprocated by the government,” it said.
It further accused Putrajaya of having moved the “goal posts” over the years “through a systematic imposition of unreasonable conditions and restrictions”....
| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Qur'an 2:256 says "there is no compulsion in religion." There are, however, innumerable means of coercion intended to make life so inconvenient, unpleasant, intolerable, and dangerous as to wear down unbelievers over time into converting or abandoning their ancestral homes. That strategy is enshrined in Qur'an 9:29, which offers non-Muslims conversion, subjugation, or war.

Muhammad wished for the Arabian peninsula to be purged of non-Muslims (Sahih Muslim 19.4366). To borrow a term from modern real estate, this vision stands as the "model community" of Islam's aspirations for the future even outside of that area in places like Iraq and beyond. The institution of dhimmitude is intended first to contain non-Islamic belief, and secondly, and consign it to a slow, quiet death as it is marginalized and expunged from the broader society.

Where dhimma laws are relaxed and fall into disuse (as inherently illogical, unnatural laws often do), unbelievers must nonetheless live in apprehension of the day that fervor for Islamic law renews hostility against them. And compliance with one's dhimmi status is always in the eye of the oppressor/beholder, leaving the dhimmi to wonder which innocent "provocation" or rumor (rumors of desecrated Qur'ans or "blasphemy" are wildly popular), will create a pretext for renewed abuse.

In Iraq, that time is now, as it also is in Pakistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia, to name a few. The common thread in all of them is, again, an increased fervor for Islamic law, which, one might have noticed, never brings an increase in tolerance or protection of civil liberties. Funny how that keeps happening.

"Time is Running Out for Iraq's Christians, Says Archbishop," from Assyrian International News Agency, March 19:

Iraq's ancient Christian community has run out of time and will disappear soon, a senior Iraqi churchman has said.
Archbishop Bashar Warda of Erbil made his alarming prediction at a press conference for the launch of the Aid to the Church in Need report on oppressed Christians abroad, Persecuted and Forgotten?
Speaking in Westminster yesterday, alongside Archbishop Vincent Nichols, Archbishop Warda said that there were fewer than 200,000 Christians left in Iraq and "the time for waiting" was running out.
Declaring that figure to be "optimistic", he said: "From what we have seen so far our people have lost patience. The past is terrifying, the present is not promising. All is left is the very limited choice of emigration, to Jordan and Turkey."
He cited Mosul, one of the most dangerous cities in the world to be a Christian, where hundreds were driven out in October 2009, saying: "In 2003 there were 4,000 Chaldean families, 1,000 Christians from other churches, and 11 active Chaldean churches. Now six churches have been closed, and if it goes this way, it won't be this long before certain areas of Iraq are evacuated.
"We have freedom of worship, but not freedom of religion, that is not allowed, in any Islamic state."
The 41-year-old archbishop was previously rector of St Peter's Chaldean Catholic Seminary in Dora, a Christian neighbourhood of Baghdad before the 2003 invasion. The seminary had to move to Erbil, in Iraqi Kurdistan, last year due to violence. Islamists have cleansed Dora almost entirely of Christians. The archbishop plans to build a Catholic University and Church-run hospital in Erbil, which will be open to all.
He described how many Christians in Baghdad and Mosul had received warnings through text messages or bullets, sometimes delivered by policemen. Some clerics received three bullets, one representing murdered priest Fr Ragheed Ganni, another for the murdered Archbishop Rahho, and another for the intended victim.
He said that, although Christians were safer in the Kurdish-controlled regions of northern Iraq, they still lacked economic security and were so impoverished some had resorted to prostitution. Some 5,000 Christian families had fled to the Kurdish-controlled region and yet, he said, the Iraqi Government cared so little for them that they had demanded European governments paid for their resettlement.
"It was a strange statement," he said of the Government's demand: "They are not some group who have emigrated from Europe. They do not come from Europe!"
Aid to the Church in Need's report found that persecution was intensifying in two thirds of the worst countries, and that many Christian communities in the Middle East faced extinction within a generation. Archbishop Warda thanked the charity and asked Christians in the west to raise awareness and making politicians aware of what was going on.
"We need to bear the cross," the archbishop said, "but it is getting heavy."
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Resuming their jihad while the world's attention is elsewhere. "Hamas fires dozens of rockets at Israel," by Ian Deitch for the Associated Press, March 19 (thanks to JCB):

JERUSALEM – Palestinian militants in Gaza fired more than 50 rockets into Israel on Saturday, the heaviest barrage in two years, Israeli officials said, while Hamas police beat up and confiscated equipment from reporters.

A Hamas official was killed and four civilians were wounded when Israel hit back with tank fire and air strikes, said Gaza Health Ministry spokesman Adham Abu Salmia....

Note how the shameless AP highlights the Palestinian casualty claims of the Hamas spokesman.

Israeli police spokesman Tamir Avtabi said Gaza militants fired 54 mortar shells at Israeli border communities within 15 minutes. He said two Israeli civilians were lightly wounded by shrapnel and residents were advised to stay at home or in bomb shelters.

Hayim Yellin, head of the Eshkol region where the mortars exploded, said they were the same type as those intercepted on a cargo ship last week loaded with weapons Israel said were sent by Iran to Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said he will file a complaint at the U.N. after Saturday's unusually large barrage of rockets. In a statement, Lieberman said the Palestinians "primary goal is destroying Israel."...

Of course.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Tell me again how the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Students Association is not a subversive organization.

Video thanks to Christopher.

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The beneficiary will be the pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist forces in Libya and elsewhere. "Military action launched against Libya," from CBS, March 19 (thanks to Mackie):

French fighter jets soared over a rebel-held city besieged by Muammar Qaddafi's troops on Saturday, the first mission for an international military force launched in support of the 5-week-old uprising against the Libyan leader's rule.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said after an emergency summit in Paris that French jets were already targeting Qaddafi's forces. The 22 participants in Saturday's summit "agreed to put in place all the means necessary, in particular military" to make Qaddafi respect a U.N. Security Council resolution Thursday demanding a cease-fire, Sarkozy said.

Qaddafi had tried to take advantage of the time lag between the U.N. resolution and the launch of the international operation, making a decisive strike on the Benghazi, Libya's second-largest city and the first major stronghold of the rebellion.

Crashing shells shook buildings, and the sounds of battle drew closer to the city center as its residents despaired. A doctor said 27 bodies were brought to the hospital by midday. By late in the day, warplanes could be heard overhead.....

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Watch for him to burst into tears any minute: Ellison comments on the fact that some people noticed the reptilian nature of his tears at the King hearings. "Keith Ellison Shrugs Off Conservative Mockers," by Evan McMorris-Santoro at TPM, March 17 (thanks to James):

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) isn't sweating the mocking his emotional testimony before Rep. Peter King's (R-NY) hearings on Muslim extremism last week generated from the right.

Asked by TPM Wednesday about the drubbing he's received from conservative pundits since he teared up before King's panel, Ellison basically said, what else is new?

"Well, you know, I don't anticipate some people will appreciate everything that I say and stand for," he said. "But I'll say this: American people realize that when we say freedom and justice for all, that means all. You know, Muslims too."

I'm all for that, of course. That's why I oppose Sharia in the U.S., since it would institutionalize oppression of women and non-Muslims. Since Rep. Ellison is all about "freedom and justice for all," I am confident that he is ready to endorse the anti-Sharia initiatives being considered now in various states. I look forward to your statement to that effect, Congressman.

Ellison said it's open season on the right when it comes to Muslims.

"Open season"! Poor choice of words, whether Ellison or the journalistic tool Evan McMorris-Santoro is responsible. One need only look at people like Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and so many other jihad murderers and would-be murderers, and easily conclude that there is open season on non-Muslims. But open season on Muslims? That's just Leftist/Islamic supremacist fantasy.

"Look there is an organized anti-Muslim industry in the United States," he said. "It's Pam Geller, it's Robert Spencer, it's Steve Emerson...it's Frank Gaffney. They're well-known entities."

"They sell books doing this, they tell people they're counter-terrorism experts, and you know," Ellison added. "But what does that have to do with the whole economic discussion we've been having?"

Yeah, let's have that economic discussion. Let's have a discussion about the $13,350 Ellison accepted from the Muslim American Society to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca.

And what is the Muslim American Society? The Muslim Brotherhood. "In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004, via the Muslim Brotherhood's English-language website, Ikhwanweb.

The Muslim Brothers "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

Imagine if a conservative Congressman had taken a trip that had been paid for by a Christian group that was, according to one of its own documents, dedicated to "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house" so that Christian law would replace the U.S. Constitution. I expect we would hear more of an outcry than we are hearing about this.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As Western economies continue to sputter, this kind of thing will become increasingly common, and will lead to Saudi purchases of many other things (as of course it already has done). And with Saudi money comes Saudi dictation. "Dalhousie medical school to sell Saudis 10 seats," by James Bradshaw in the Globe and Mail, March 17 (thanks to Rosine):

In an urgent bid to plug a hole in its budget, Dalhousie University’s medical school will sell 10 vacant first-year seats to students from Saudi Arabia for $75,000 annually.

Dalhousie’s medical dean, Tom Marrie, says a reduction in provincial grants last year left the program underfunded, and that generating money from empty spaces is crucial to balancing the books.

The scheme is a targeted, stopgap solution, and may not be repeated. But most Canadian universities, including Dalhousie, are trumpeting Canadian education and looking to increase their foreign student enrolment as global competition for top talent – including those with deep pockets – heats up....

The Saudi students will pay considerably more than their domestic counterparts, whose tuition and government funding amounts to less than $40,000, but Dr. Marrie said “that’s not unreasonable” when compared with other international fees. The 10 students are expected to return to Saudi Arabia for their residencies.

“We’ve got to find a way to run the place. This is one of those ways,” he said. “We just need this money to function.”...

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And rightly so. "Revolts: Netanyahu Wants Democracy, But Fears 'New Irans,'" from ANSAmed, March 18 (thanks to Insubria):

(ANSAmed) - TEL AVIV, MARCH 18 - Israel confidently hopes that, in perspective, the winds of protest that started to blow in various Arab countries can lead to a major democratic change across the whole Middle East. But at the same time he warned the West about the ''nightmare'' involving, in the near future, the emergence of ''new Irans'' here and there, to the complete benefit of the regional ambitions of Teheran's Islamic-radical regime, the sworn enemy of the Jewish State and others.

The warning was lastly renewed, with the usual tones, by premier Benyamin Netanyahu, in a lengthy Cnn interview distributed today in Israel by his press office. (ANSAmed).

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
AslanMar20112.jpgAn unskillful propagandist


Reza Aslan is an ongoing Jihad Watch case study in how the media elites are either ignorant of or complicit with the Islamic supremacist agenda. Aslan, despite his pretensions, has revealed himself to be a arrogant gutter-minded adolescent who appears clownishly incapable of staking out or defending a coherent intellectual position and instead retails tired and oft-retreaded Islamic supremacist talking points about Muslim victimhood.

Nonetheless, he is a vaunted media-saturated "moderate" Muslim whose Islamic supremacist ties and proclivities are becoming more ill-concealed by the day. And here we go again, with an ironically (given its title) fact-less propaganda piece by Aslan last week in the Washington Post: "On Muslims, King has reached his own fact-less conclusion," by Reza Aslan in the Washington Post, March 11:

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, will begin holding hearings Thursday on "the extent of the radicalization of American Muslims." Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, has characterized the hearings as "a witch hunt." Are they?

How interesting that Aslan doesn't bother to mention that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements.

But that is no surprise when one remembers that Aslan is a Board member of the National Iranian American Council, a group that genuine Iranian pro-democracy forces regard as an apologetic vehicle for the Islamic Republic of Iran. He has tried to pass off Iran's genocidally-minded President Ahmadinejad as a liberal reformer. He has called on the U.S. Government to negotiate with Ahmadinejad himself, as well as with Hamas -- that is, with two of the most barbaric and murderous adherents of Sharia. He has even praised the jihad terror group Hizballah as "the most dynamic political and social organization in Lebanon," as well as the Jew-hating, women-hating, kuffar-hating Muslim Brotherhood.

He has also spoken at events sponsored by the Muslim Students Association, a Brotherhood group, and at an event co-sponsored by the Los Angeles chapter of Hamas-linked CAIR, and moderated by the notorious Edina Lekovic, the Muslim Public Affairs Council flack whom Steve Emerson caught lying on national television, denying she was editor of a Muslim student publication that praised Osama bin Laden as a great mujahid. Emerson produced copies of the rag showing Lekovic's name on the masthead as editor on the very same page on which the praise for Osama appeared.

In light of all this, it's clear that CAIR and Aslan are on the same side, and it's clear which side they're on.

King also has said he believes the "self-radicalization" of American Muslims represents "a very small minority" of the overall community. What are the potential consequences of singling out one religious group?

Well, whatever they may be, I doubt they will be as costly in lives as the continued tendency of Islamic jihadists to single out non-Muslims for jihad attacks, both in the U.S. and around the world.

All one needs to know about what is behind the King hearings can be gleaned by Peter King's own statements regarding Muslims in the US.

How does Rep. King feel about Islam in the United States?

"Unfortunately, we have too many mosques in this country. There are too many people who are sympathetic to radical Islam. We should be looking at them more carefully. We should be finding out how we can infiltrate [them].

How does King know so much about radicalization in the US? From a single source more than decade ago.

"The only real testimony we have on it is from Sheikh Kabbani who was a Muslim leader during the Clinton Administration, he testified back in 1999 and 2000 before the State Department that he thought over 80 percent of the mosques in this country are controlled by radical Imams. Certainly from what I've seen and dealings I've had, that number seems accurate."

King's single source, Sheikh Kabbani, is a Sufi Muslim who has advocated for peace and tolerance in Islam but who by his own admission is not an authority on Islam in America and who has admitted to simply stating his personal opinion - an opinion that has been contradicted by both the FBI and by every scholar who has studied the matter. Oh, and by the way, Sheikh Kabbani has also claimed that any Muslim who advises the US government is also "an extremist." But King is not interested in facts. He just feels like it must be at least 80%.

"It was 80 percent back in 2000. Based on the radicalization since then, it has to be -- I have no doubt, I have problem at all in saying it's 85 percent. If it's not 85, it's still 80."...

Aslan then defames the great anti-terror researcher Steven Emerson, and adds:

Of course, King could try to speak to American Muslims himself. But it seems he has already reached his own, fact-less conclusions....

Actually, it is Aslan's conclusions that are "fact-less." On December 6, in a post about Aslan, I supplied evidence to back up the estimate that King later repeated. Yet on March 11, he felt free to continue to pretend in the Washington Post that King had no evidence. If the Post were any kind of real journalistic outlet, they wouldn't let him get away with this, but the WaPo cares not for truths that don't fit its political agenda.

In any case, Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani's 1998 study was not based on his personal opinion, as Aslan claims. Kabbani actually visited 114 mosques in this country before giving testimony before a State Department Open Forum in January 1999 that 80% of American mosques taught the "extremist ideology." Has Reza Aslan investigated 114 mosques in the U.S.? Then there was the Center for Religious Freedom's 2005 study, and the Mapping Sharia Project's 2008 study. Each independently showed that upwards of 80% of mosques in America were preaching hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity ultimately to impose Islamic rule.

Not only that. Also, I challenged Aslan five months ago, on October 4, to provide any evidence that any of these studies had been debunked by anyone. He has not done so, and cannot do so. Obviously, he doesn't care to do so, because to address this data would interfere with his deceptive agenda.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

If this man is a Muslim, he may have been trying to "strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah" (Qur'an 8:60). If he is not a Muslim, he is just an idiot looking for attention and finding a pathway to it by aping one of the most common news stories of the day; he almost certainly doesn't realize that by doing so he has just committed "Islamophobia."

"Man charged for playing Jihad bomber," from CITN, March 18:

(Grand Cayman - CITN) - A 35-year-old man has been charged and is expected to appear in court this morning (Friday, 18 March) following a bomb hoax incident.

On Monday afternoon (14 March 2011) a man called the 911 emergency communications centre claiming that he was a member of Jihad and had planted C4 in the Cayman Islands.

Later that day following a police operation in the West Bay area a 35-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of making a bomb hoax....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Malik Jalal Sarhadi Qatkhel of the North Waziristan Peace Committee (remember, Islam is the Religion of Peace™!) says that suicide attacks are permitted against Americans as part of this jihad. Yet still we don't see any of the Vast Majority of Peaceful Muslims journeying to North Waziristan to correct this widespread misunderstanding of Islam. Where are Honest Ibe Hooper and Boy Reza Aslan when you need them?

"North Waziristan elders declare jihad against US as revenge for drone attacks," from ANI, March 19:

A jirga of tribal elders from Pakistan's North Waziristan Agency has said that they would wage jihad against the United States to avenge those killed in drone attacks.

A US drone attack killed at least 44 people, most of them tribal elders, in Datta Khel area, North Waziristan on Thursday.

Malik Jalal Sarhadi Qatkhel, head of the North Waziristan Peace Committee, said that the tribes would wage a jihad against the US as well as Pakistanis who are helping them carry out the Predator drone strikes.

He said that they had allowed their youths to carry out suicide attacks against the Americans.

"There is no Al-Qaeda and Taliban presence in North Waziristan, while the Americans themselves have acknowledged that around 70 per cent of Afghanistan is under the control of militants," the Express Tribune quoted Qatkhel, as saying.

"Unlike [those] who pardoned the killer of two Pakistanis for dollars, we will take revenge for our dead and the world will see it," he added.

He also said that they would avenge the killings "even if it takes a hundred years".

"We want to avenge the killings. We never forgive our enemy. I allow suicide attacks on Americans," Qatkhel said.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 18, 2011

What was that Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacist groups were saying about how it was utterly fanciful that Sharia would ever be used to judge cases in American courts?

HillsboroughFLCase1.jpg
HillsboroughFLCase2.jpg

Thanks to all who sent this in.

| 183 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The fact that Gaddafi is a reprehensible human being and no friend of the U.S. does not automatically turn his opponents into Thomas Paine. "U.S. to deploy more ships to support Libya planning," by Phil Stewart for Reuters, March 18:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will deploy additional amphibious ships to the Mediterranean, the military said on Friday, as part of the Obama administration's plans for responding to ongoing violence in Libya.

The USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group will deploy on March 23 "ahead of its original schedule in order to relieve units from the USS Kearsarge (Amphibious Ready Group) currently positioned in the Mediterranean Sea," it said in a statement....

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mosque.jpg


It's a Friday afternoon and the world is on the brink, so what better time than now for a Jihad Watch contest? The above photo was snapped by a Jihad Watch operative. Of course, there are many similar mosques all over the world, but this one is to the best of my knowledge the largest one of its kind in the nation in which it is found. If you are the first to name the city in which this particular mosque is found, I will send you one of the few remaining Jihad Watch t-shirts, from back in the halcyon days when the Jihad Watch T-Shirt Factories were still employing thousands and churning out t-shirts twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The remainders, all size XL, now reside in the parts of the Jihad Watch offices not destroyed by flooding (most of the stock that survived the closing of the Factories went down in the floods, but there are a few left).

So where is that mosque? Riyadh? Karachi? Dar es-Salaam? Somewhere else? (This is not a multiple choice question -- the mosque could be anywhere.) And for a t-shirt autographed copy of one of my books, specify what it is the largest example of. Answer in the comments field.

| 79 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But it is a secular, pro-democracy movement, doncha know. Abboud al-Zommor was released from prison and may enter politics? So what could go wrong? It isn't as if Islamic supremacists enjoy any popular support in Egypt! "Sadat killing mastermind mulls politics after release," from International Business Times, March 18:

The mastermind behind the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981, who has been released from prison since the fall of Hosni Mubarak regime, has plans to take part in post-Mubarak political future of Egypt, according to reports.

The son of a Sudanese mother and Egyptian father, Anwar El-Sadat became president in the fall of 1970 after the untimely death of Gamal Abdel Nasser. Sadat’s eleven-year reign was extremely eventful for it included a purge from the government of Nasserists, the October 1973 war with Israel, the Arab oil embargo, the 1977 bread riots and ultimately the peace treaty with Israel in 1979. That last act likely cost him his life as he was murdered two years later by assassins from his own military.

Islamic Jihad leader Abboud al-Zommor was the brain behind the killing of Sadat, who made peace with Israel and signed the Camp David peace treaty under the aegis of the United States. Al-Zommor was released last week after spending decades in Egyptian prison.

"Now, after the ouster of former president Hosni Mubarak's government, al-Zommor plans to take part in mapping out the future of Egypt," the Doha-based Al Jazeera has reported.

The report said prisoners who have been released after the fall of the Mubarak regime are planning to form political movements. Thousands of people had been detained, most illegally, during the regime of Mubarak who strongly opposed the right wing Islamic groups in the country.

Note the mainstream media's usage: groups that want to impose Islamic law are "right-wing," and groups that oppose Islamic law, such as our own Stop Islamization of America (SIOA), are also "right-wing." This has become a term entirely lacking in content. At this point it only means "A person or group that the media elites think is bad."

After the regime change, hundreds of illegal detainees have been released. Al-Zommor's 'Jihad' group was working for the overthrow of the secular government in the country and the establishment of an Islamic state, the report says.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On this the FBI is far more realistic and open-eyed than the White House. What a surprise. More on this story. "Hamas-associated CAIR applauded by White House," by Neil Munro in The Daily Caller, March 18 (thanks to Mackie):

White House officials have applauded advocacy efforts by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, even though top FBI managers refuse to meet its leaders, the council has been judged by courts to have been associated with the Islamic terror group Hamas, and several of its employees and members have been jailed or expelled for jihadi-related terrorist offenses since 2001.

CAIR was publicly applauded at a Mar. 10 White House event by Valerie Jarrett, senior advisor and assistant to the president for intergovernmental affairs and public engagement, for its work with MTV to counter “bullying.” “Bullying can be prevented if we all take action,” said Jarrett, as she cited the MTV project, and named CAIR as a partner.

After lauding the National Education Association, Cartoon Network and a litany of other Democratic-affiliated advocacy groups and companies that are part of the White House’s “anti-bullying” campaign to reshape children’s opinions, Jarrett thanked MTV for “launching a new coalition that will work to fight bullying and intolerance online.” The coalition partners include the Hispanic advocacy group, “the National Council of La Raza, the Anti-Defamation League, and the [Council on] American-Islamic Relations, GLAAD and many others,” Jarrett said.

“There’s no controversy,” said Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR’s press secretary. To advance CAIR’s causes, including “cyber-bullying,” he said, “we do what we think is necessary…what other people do is up to them.”...

"...and if they cross us, we will destroy them," he might have added under his breath.

Like many other activists in the White House’s campaign, Hooper conflated physical bullying and intimidation with routine spoken and online criticism of ideas and behavior, and suggested that CAIR’s critics were violent. “There’s a cottage industry of ‘Muslim-bashers’ who seek on a daily basis to marginalize American Muslims and to demonize Islam,” said Hooper.

Honest Ibe Hooper must know that the ones who are actually demonizing Muslims are people like Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and so many other jihad murderers and would-be murderers who justify their murders by reference to the texts and teachings of Islam. They demonize Muslims far more effectively than anything any non-Muslim, no matter how genuinely hateful, could ever possibly accomplish.

The ‘-basher’ phrase was first used by gay-advocates to tar their critics as violent, and is now routinely used by Hooper and other Islamist advocates to portray their critics as violent. ‘Muslim-basher,’ Hooper said, is “colloquial American-English for someone who rhetorically bashes Muslims.”

When asked about CAIR’s view of Hamas, Hooper sent a statement saying “we unequivocally condemn all acts of terrorism, whether carried out by al-Qa’ida, the Real IRA, FARC, Hamas, ETA, or any other group.” However, CAIR’s statement is ambiguous because Islamists describe Israeli military operations as “terrorism” and their attacks on Israeli civilians as justified “resistance” or “jihad.”...

Good on you for noticing that, Munro.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The courageous ex-Muslim Nonie Darwish expands on criticisms that Pamela Geller and I have made of the unfortunate politically correct cast of the King hearings on Muslim "radicalization."

"Former Muslims Excluded From King Hearings," by Nonie Darwish in FrontPage, March 17 (thanks to Inexion):

I have admiration and respect for Congressman Peter King and I salute him for holding hearings on the “Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and that Community’s Response.” However, as a former Muslim I have not seen anyone testifying on our behalf in the hearings. At least one former Muslims should have been there to tell America of our plight. To tell them why we left Islam right here in America. How we had to choose between Islam and loving America. How radicals and jihadists followed us right here after we immigrated to the US to try to force us back into the same old culture of jihad, hatred and anti-Semitism — that we had escaped from in the first place. How radicals who want to deny us our freedom of religion under the US constitution threaten our lives and civil rights daily.

Most former Muslims in the US started by going to mosques but we soon discovered a political and jihadist agenda. In mosques I was told not to assimilate in America, to have more children and to wear Islamic clothes even though I never wore it in the Middle East before coming to the US. We were encouraged to pray wherever we wanted and do that with assertion even if we have to inconvenience others at airports, baseball games or at work. We soon found out that many mosques in America, as they are in the Middle East, are more of a political organization than a place of worship. We noticed that the more pious Muslims in the mosque were the ones seeking confrontation with American culture, such as getting offended if Americans have dogs or alcohol when riding cabs with Muslim taxi drivers.

Muslims are told openly in mosques that they have a mission in America and that is to make Islam the law of the land. Lying to America and getting offended to cover up the jihadist aspiration was encouraged, and became a perfected art and a religious obligation, which further alienated Muslims from American culture.

Many of us former Muslims have left the religion precisely because of the radicalization we confronted in America. But when we dared to stop going to mosques and left Islam altogether our lives turned into a nightmare. Many former Muslims contact me looking for shelter after their lives have been threatened. Just a couple of days ago I was contacted by a young 21 year old Muslim man telling me he left Islam years ago and has to hide the Bible from his family and friends after his own brother told him he was going to kill him if he does not return to Islam....

Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not that they're anything but secular pro-democracy protesters, doncha know.

"Bahrain crackdown enrages Shiites across region," by Barbara Surk for The Associated Press, March 18:

MANAMA, Bahrain — Bahrain's army on Friday demolished the 300-foot (90-meter) monument that had become a symbol of a monthlong Shiite uprising against the Sunni monarchy in the Gulf nation.

The destruction of the six white curved beams topped with a huge cement pearl underlined the resolve of the Sunni regime to root out any dissent in the kingdom, now under emergency rule.

The structure was built in Pearl Square as a monument to Bahrain's history as a pearl-diving center but became associated with the protests that have roiled the majority Shiite nation. Security forces overran a protest camp at the square on Wednesday, setting off clashes that killed at least five people, including two policemen. At least 12 people have been killed in the month-long revolt.

Bahrain's foreign minister, Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa, told reporters in Manama that the army brought down the monument because "it was a bad memory."

"We are not waging war, we are restoring law and order," Khalid said at a press conference in Manama....

Shiites account for 70 percent of the tiny island's half-million people but they are widely excluded from high-level posts and positions in the police and military of the country, whic is home to the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet.

Shiite anger rose sharply around the Mideast on Friday as large crowds in Iran and Iraq cursed Bahrain's Sunni monarchy and its Saudi backers over the violent crackdown on protesters demanding more rights.

Amateur video footage of security forces shooting and beating protesters has spread across the internet and fueled fury in predominantly Shiite Iraq and in Iran, where a senior cleric on Friday urged Bahraini protesters to keep going until victory or death.

"Brothers and sisters" in Bahrain should "resist against the enemy until you die or win," Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati told worshippers at Friday prayers at Tehran University, a nationally televised forum seen as expressing the views of Iran's ruling Shiite clergy.

Worshippers chanted angry slogans against Saudi Arabia's royal family, which has sent troops to back Bahrain's king.

"There is no God but Allah, Al Saud is God's enemy," some chanted in Arabic. One Persian banner read, "Death to Al Saud."

Across Iraq, thousands rallied in mostly Shiite cities in the country's largest demonstrations since a wave of dissent spread across the Middle East in the wake of Tunisia's overthrow of its autocratic president.

Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani — Iraqi-based Shiism's highest ranking cleric in the Mideast — suspended teachings at religious schools across Iraq on Friday in a show of solidarity with the protesters.

A representative of al-Sistani warned during his Friday sermon in the holy city of Karbala that the brutal images of what is happening in Bahrain will inflame passions and lead to sectarian problems in the region.

"I am ready to sacrifice by my soul, blood and money to support and help our brothers in Bahrain," said one protester in Baghdad, Younis al-Moussawi....

The United States bases the 5th Fleet in Bahrain partly to counter Iran's military reach around the region.

At least for now.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

CAIR's ties to Hamas are "ongoing," say the feds. Yet the mainstream media keeps going to that amiable stomach-stapled beekeeper, Honest Ibe Hooper, as if he really were the spokesman for a civil rights organization. It would rather like CBS interviewing Josef Goebbels and identifying him as a "civil rights activist" in a 1942 broadcast.

"FBI chief confirms ties cut with U.S. Muslim group: Agency bans outreach due to terrorist links," from WorldNetDaily, March 18 (thanks to all who sent this in):

In stunning testimony on Capitol Hill, the head of the FBI explained his agency has cut off ties to the most influential Muslim organization in America due to concerns over its leaders' association with terrorism.

Since the Justice Department linked the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations to a 2008 terror-finance case, the FBI has refused to work directly with the group's national office or any of its 30-plus chapters across the country.

Wednesday's hearing held by the House Judiciary Committee marked the first time FBI Director Robert Mueller has narrowed down the cause of concern to CAIR's "national leadership."

"We have no formal relationship with CAIR because of concerns with regard to the national leadership," Mueller testified.

CAIR's current executive director is Nihad Awad.

Wiretap evidence from the Holy Land Foundation terror-finance case put Awad at a Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charity. Wiretaps also record them stating the need to deceive Americans about their true aims.

The secret meeting, held in the 1990s at a Courtyard by Marriott hotel, was called to order by CAIR founding chairman Omar Ahmad. Both he and Awad launched CAIR not long after the meeting.

Mueller acknowledged the wiretap evidence during the House Judiciary Committee hearing.

The Justice Department designated Ahmad and CAIR as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land trial, the largest terror-finance case in U.S. history. A federal jury convicted Holy Land's leaders on all 108 counts.

Ahmad stepped down from CAIR's board of directors shortly after his federal designation.

Among other evidence collected by the FBI, the names of both Ahmad and Awad – who remains at CAIR's helm and regularly appears on Fox News and other media – appear in a secret phone book alongside key Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk, whom the government says directed and coordinated Hamas terrorist attacks on civilians in Israel. Hamas also has murdered more than 17 Americans and has been listed as a U.S.-designated terror group since the 1990s.

During the Holy Land trial, U.S. prosecutors alleged that CAIR's ties to Hamas are "ongoing." In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI Assistant Director Richard Power suggested Ahmad and Awad remain under federal scrutiny....

This month, for the first time, both the Associated Press and Washington Post published stories confirming CAIR's links to terrorism and its federal designation as an unindicted co-conspirator.....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

MPAC's al-Marayati concludes this piece by saying that "we must earn our respect as Muslims by working for the prosperity of our societies. We must seek essential reforms that, along with our own honorable actions, will protect and exalt the name of Islam. The Quran provides a response to defamation in general: 'Good and evil are not equal; so repel evil with something good and better so that the one with whom there is enmity will become a close friend.'"

That's Qur'an 41:34, but al-Marayati himself has not been consistent in following this principle; I've "debated" him on several shows and found him to be a remarkably unpleasant man, an energetic practitioner of the usual Islamic supremacist "debating" tactic of sidestepping all substantive issues and instead engaging in venomous personal attacks against his opponent. Even in a field dominated by arrogant, contemptuous deceivers given to vile ad hominem assaults, al-Marayati stands out. I am sure, of course, that he is nonetheless trying valiantly but failing to live up to the Qur'an's sterling admonition to work to make friends with "one with whom there is enmity" -- and I certainly hope he is likewise failing to live up to other Qur'anic admonitions such as the one to "slay the pagans wherever you find them" (9:5) and suchlike.

But in this article, he sounds all the right notes: he condemns Pakistan's blasphemy law, he notes how susceptible it is to abuse, he speaks out against the murders of Salman Taseer and Shahbaz Bhatti, and he calls for "essential reforms." He even denounces the OIC's campaign against the freedom of speech. What could be wrong with this? The main thing is that he misrepresents Muhammad's words and actions regarding people who insulted him, and Islamic law regarding insults to Muhammad or Islam. And so once again: is al-Marayati a reformer or a deceiver? Wouldn't a genuine reformer be honest about the elements of Islam that he considers in need of reforming, rather than claiming that those elements don't even exist? Is that really too much to ask?

"Blasphemy Laws Are Against Islam," by Salam Al Marayati in the Huffington Post, March 16:

Blasphemy laws or laws prohibiting defamation of a religion are incompatible with Islamic thought and philosophy. The concept of Defamation of Religions denies a person their free will to choose -- one of God's greatest gifts to humanity -- and deprives individuals of their right to free speech and expression. It also creates a climate of intolerance that can breed discrimination and violence.

This was the message I delivered last week during a Human Rights First panel discussion in Geneva, where the United Nations Human Rights Council is expected to discuss a resolution seeking this week to criminalize "defamation of religions," as it has done several years for the past decade. However, this year's debate comes at a unique and particularly tumultuous time.

Earlier this month, Pakistan's Minister for Minority Affairs, Shabbaz Bhatti, was murdered for speaking out in favor of amending the nation's blasphemy laws. His assassination came less than two months after the murder of Governor Salmaan Taseer, who was assassinated by one of his own body guards. Taseer's killer tried to justify his act by citing Islamic law. Taseer was an outspoken defender of a Christian woman who sentenced to death in Pakistan after being accused of blasphemy. The assassin, now in custody and facing murder charges, has been called a "hero" by a vocal and influential minority of Pakistanis who echo his misguided reasoning and support brutal blasphemy laws.

Blasphemy laws were first introduced to Muslim countries during the days of colonialism and are now a major obstacle to Islamic reform.

Al-Marayati implies here that the colonialist powers introduced blasphemy laws from Christian Europe into an Islamic world that had hitherto been peaceful and tolerant. He makes no mention of the fact that the death penalty for blasphemy is universal in Islamic law, and has existed as long as Islamic law has existed.

Often used to restrict freedom of expression and to settle personal scores, these laws have led to devastating consequences for religious minorities and others whose views differ from the majority. It has become all too common and acceptable to file an accusation of blasphemy, claims that can include insulting the Quran or Prophet Muhammad, and to condemn those who speak out against such abuses.

Those who support the "Defamation of Religions" resolution first introduced at the United Nations over a decade ago by the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), argue that it serves to combat the rise of hatred and discrimination against Muslims in the world. They are wrong. In fact, this resolution does the opposite. Its implementation would illustrate Muslim suppression of Western standards of freedom of speech[.]

The Quran mandates "there shall be no coercion in matters of faith" (2:256). This Quranic injunction is meant to protect freedom of religious belief and expression for all people; it is also meant to prohibit any government or group of people from intruding on the private lives of its people. Islam calls for the freedom, not for the suppression, of free speech and it condemns violations of fundamental human rights.

Actually Islam mandates death for non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state who mention "something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam" ('Umdat al-Salik, o11.10).

In fact, the Quran documents the criticism of Islam by poets and political leaders at the time of its revelation. Though the Prophet was accused of sorcery and mania, in each and every case, God did not order him to punish the blasphemers. Instead, His order to the Prophet was to respond to their hate speech with good speech and good work. In other words, Islam calls for freedom of speech and for competing freely in the marketplace of ideas. No one has the right to play the role of God on this earth.

This is where al-Marayati must know that what he is writing is not true. There are several celebrated incidents in which Muhammad lashed out violently against his opponents, ordering the murder of several poets, including Abu ‘Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess ‘Asma bint Marwan. Abu ‘Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad's question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, ‘Umayr ibn ‘Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop ‘Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, ‘Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)

Then there was Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf. Muhammad asked: "Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?" One of the Muslims, Muhammad bin Maslama answered, "O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?" When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab)." Muhammad responded: "You may say it." Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka'b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Sahih Bukhari, volume 5, book 59, number 369)

If al-Marayati had mentioned these incidents, even to explain them away in some way, he would have a much greater case to be trusted.

In the Quran, there is no provision for the absolute protection of (any) religion nor any punishment mandated for those who defame religion. Just like current standards of international law, the Quran calls for the protection of individuals and their rights. It is this protection that should be at the heart of any resolution proposed to combat religious intolerance and discrimination....

The proposed U.N. resolution on "Defamation of Religions" will certainly not prevent discrimination against Muslims, nor will it fight religious intolerance. Its passage would only further fuel anti-Muslim stereotyping and hatred.

We must earn our respect as Muslims by working for the prosperity of our societies. We must seek essential reforms that, along with our own honorable actions, will protect and exalt the name of Islam. The Quran provides a response to defamation in general: "Good and evil are not equal; so repel evil with something good and better so that the one with whom there is enmity will become a close friend."

Hope you work on that, Marayati.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Did anyone at British Airways ever think twice about hiring Rajib Karim? Of course not! That would have been "Islamophobic." Better a plane gets blown up than that.

"Terror plot BA man Rajib Karim gets 30 years," from the BBC, March 18 (thanks to Paul):

A former British Airways software engineer has been jailed for 30 years for plotting to blow up a plane.

Rajib Karim, 31, from Newcastle, used his job to access information for an al-Qaeda preacher based in Yemen to target BA's flights in the US.

Sentencing him at Woolwich Crown Court, Mr Justice Calvert-Smith said he was a committed jihadist who planned offences "about as grave as could be imagined".

The judge said he had worked "incessantly" for terrorist purposes.

Karim, a Bangladeshi who had sought a British passport, had kept his true intentions secret from colleagues at BA, Mr Justice Calvert-Smith added.

He said Karim was a "willing follower" who could have brought serious harm and death to civilians had his planning with others come to anything....

The judge told the court: "The offences were of the utmost gravity. You are and were a committed jihadist who understood his duty to his religion involves fighting and, God-willing, dying and then being rewarded in the afterlife.

"It is a feature of this case that none of those who worked with you at British Airways had even the slightest notion of what was going on."

The court had heard Karim hid his hatred for the West from colleagues by joining a gym, playing football and never airing extreme views.

At the same time he was using his access to the airline's offices in Newcastle upon Tyne and at London's Heathrow airport to pass on sensitive information....

He and his brother had contacted radical preacher Anwar al-Awlaki, a key figure in al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, saying they wanted to fight jihad overseas.

But Awlaki, a US-born preacher, persuaded Karim to stay at BA and find a way of getting a bomb on a plane, saying the IT worker could be the breakthrough al-Qaeda was looking for.

Karim agreed to work with Awlaki and said he would also look at whether he could crash BA's computer systems, bringing chaos to international travel.

The father-of-one, who was raised in a middle-class family in Dhaka, was described as "mild-mannered, well-educated and respectful"....

I'm sure he is a decent fellow.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is so-called because its leader is former prime minister Nawaz Sharif. The party is "struggling for a peaceful world for a humane and socially just society with equal opportunities for all in light of the universal principles of Islam." Here, it expresses that ever-present source of Muslim rage, the feeling of humiliation in the wake of the blood-money (paid by whom?) release of CIA contractor Raymond Davis.

More on this story. "Raymond Davis's release a national tragedy: The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz," from IANS, March 18 (thanks to Twostellas):

Islamabad, March 18 : The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has said the release of CIA security contractor Raymond Davis was a "national tragedy".

"The bargaining conducted by the federal government will be remembered as national tragedy in the country's history," the PML-N Leader of Opposition, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan was quoted as saying by The News International.

Davis, 36, shot dead two Pakistanis on a motorcycle in Lahore Jan 27 in what he described as an attempted armed robbery. He claimed he acted in self-defence.

A court in Lahore Wednesday acquitted Davis after he reportedly paid compensation to the kin of the dead.

"They (the government) have sold the dignity of the nation only to save a foreign national," Khan said.

Khan asked those who took "such a big decision" to show moral courage and accept their responsibility before the nation.

He said the days of the rulers, who have no sincerity in national interest, were numbered, and that the PML-N would launch a protest in parliament against Davis's release.

"They have put national interest at stake," he said....

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 17, 2011

IrumAbbasi.jpgAbbasi hard at work claiming victim status


Irum Abbasi may have been wrongly singled out. Nonetheless, the involvement of Hamas-linked CAIR in her case is just one of many red flags. In reality, no one should be shedding any real tears for Irum Abbasi, especially Irum Abbasi. She says, "I have lived in the United States for 10 years. I am a U.S. citizen." So if she is a loyal U.S. citizen, she should understand that what happened to her is an unfortunate consequence of the fact that devout, observant Muslims worldwide, including hijab-wearing women, have carried out jihad terror attacks in the name of Islam, and so people who are entrusted with the safety of airline passengers have every reason to err on the side of suspicion. Those who are thus inconvenienced should consider it a small price to pay in order to head off the next terror attack.

I speak from experience. More than once I have been held and questioned at airports because of my work. Once I was working on this website on my laptop, someone saw "jihad" on my screen, and presently I was surrounded by police and large dogs, and hauled off for questioning.

Another time I was in an airport, having hurried from a venue where I had just given a talk. I don't ever speak from a written text, but I do carry notes -- a page or two of quotations from various Muslim Brotherhood operatives, etc., including jihadist and Islamic supremacist statements by some putative American moderate Muslims, as well as quotations from the Qur'an and Hadith, etc. I had this material in my suit pocket, and it dropped out when I took off my suit jacket to go through security. So a few minutes later I was again in the friendly presence of police and TSA personnel. One gentleman was holding up my notes and asking me why I had this material. I started laughing, because I realized that there was absolutely nothing in the notes to show that I actually opposed what was written there -- and realized that it might take awhile to straighten the whole thing out.

And it did. But I didn't mind. Because I knew what they were doing. I knew they weren't holding the bearded, swarthy fellow with notes full of jihad and hate because they were racists and bigots, and didn't like people of Middle Eastern descent, or hated Muslims, or what have you. They were doing their job, which was to protect the American people. Irum Abbasi and Hamas-linked CAIR should realize that, and I think they do. They should also realize that we are on to them.

"Muslim removed from flight wants crew disciplined," from the Associated Press, March 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

SAN DIEGO — A Muslim woman said Wednesday that she wants a Southwest Airlines crew disciplined for removing her from a flight for wearing a headscarf.

Irum Abbasi, 31, told reporters at a news conference outside San Diego's airport that she was forced off a San Jose-bound flight in San Diego on Sunday because a flight attendant found her to be suspicious.

Abbasi said she was told that a flight attendant overheard her say on her cell phone words to the effect of: "It's a go."

The mother of three, who is originally from Pakistan, told reporters that she said, "I've got to go," before hanging up because the flight was about to depart. She believes the flight attendant made the assumption about her comment because she was wearing an Islamic head scarf.

After patting down her head scarf and talking to her, Transportation Security Administration agents recognized the mistake and told her it was not necessary to inspect her purse or cell phone, Abbasi said.

But they refused to let her back on the plane, telling her the crew was uncomfortable with her on the flight, according to Abbasi. She was booked on the next flight.

"I was in tears," Abbasi said. "I was just crying. I have lived in the United States for 10 years. I am a U.S. citizen."

Southwest spokesman Chris Mainz said the airline has apologized to Abbasi twice, including the day of the incident. The airline also gave her a voucher for another flight, he said.

Abbasi said she gave the voucher to someone else and at this point does not want to fly Southwest again. She said she wants a written apology and a guarantee that the crew will be disciplined.

Abbasi, who is originally from Pakistan, said the verbal apology "doesn't make me feel better. This time they said we weren't comfortable with the head scarf. Next time, they won't be comfortable with my accent or they won't be comfortable with my South Asian heritage."...

Hanif Mohebi, director of the San Diego chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said his group believes she was targeted because of her head scarf and wants to meet with the airline to ensure it does not happen again.

Abbasi attributed her removal to growing anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. and said that it was a direct result of the congressional hearing called by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., on the radicalization of U.S. Muslims....

The same day Abbasi was removed from a plane in San Diego, pilots on an Alaska Airlines flight from Mexico City to Los Angeles locked down the cockpit and alerted authorities when a flight crew grew alarmed at the behavior of three men who were conducting an elaborate orthodox Jewish prayer.

FBI and customs agents along with police and a full assignment of fire trucks met the plane at the gate at Los Angeles International Airport, and the men were escorted off. After questioning from the FBI, the men were released without being arrested.

Are the orthodox Jews demanding an apology? Holding press conferences? Claiming Judeophobia?

| 99 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Slavery is taken for granted in the Qur'an, so Saeeda Khan probably didn't see anything wrong with what she was doing at all.

"Brit-Muslim woman convicted of trafficking woman she used as slave," from ANI, March 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

London, Mar 17 : A former hospital director in Britain has been convicted of trafficking a woman from Tanzania and using her as a "slave".

Saeeda Khan had brought Mwanahamisi Mruke, 47, to the UK with the promise of a domestic service visa, 120,000 Tanzanian shillings a month (50 pounds), and also 10 pounds a month pocket money.

Mruke, who was desperate to fund her daughter Zakia’s college education, agreed.

But when she arrived in Britain in October 2006, Mruke was forced by Khan to work around the clock and sleep on the kitchen floor of her home in Harrow, London, for the next three years.

Mruke was fed just two slices of bread a day, ordered around by a bell, which her captor kept in her bedroom, and prohibited from leaving the house.

Her passport was also taken away, and Khan made threats about her relatives in Tanzania, and although the payment arrangements were initially honoured, Khan stopped paying Mruke after one year.

The jury at Southwark crown court found Khan guilty of trafficking a person into the UK for exploitation.

She was sentenced to nine months in prison, suspended for two years, and ordered to pay 15,000 pounds towards police and prosecution costs, plus 25,000 pounds compensation to Mruke.

Judge Geoffrey Rivlin QC said Khan had told “a pack of lies” during the trial.

“Your behaviour was callous and greedy,” the Guardian quoted him as saying.

Speaking after she was convicted, Mruke said she would “never forgive” the person who had imprisoned her.

“I felt like a fool, I was treated like a slave. Even the money I was promised, I was never paid. I feel terrible about this,” she stated....

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Let's have a look at one example of how Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, spread compassion among the nations. As I explain in my book The Truth About Muhammad, Muhammad led a Muslim force against the Khaybar oasis, which was inhabited by Jews -- many of whom he had previously exiled from Medina. When he did so, he was not responding to any provocation; he encountered the men of Khaybar going out to work their farms, with no idea that they were about to be attacked. One of the Muslims later remembered: "When the apostle raided a people he waited until the morning. If he heard a call to prayer he held back; if he did not hear it he attacked. We came to Khaybar by night, and the apostle passed the night there; and when morning came he did not hear the call to prayer, so he rode and we rode with him....We met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, 'Muhammad with his force,' and turned tail and fled. The apostle said, 'Allah Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed. When we arrive in a people's square it is a bad morning for those who have been warned.'"

The Muslim advance was inexorable. "The apostle," according to Muhammad's earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, "seized the property piece by piece and conquered the forts one by one as he came to them." Another biographer of Muhammad, Ibn Sa'd, reports that the battle was fierce: the "polytheists...killed a large number of [Muhammad's] Companions and he also put to death a very large number of them....He killed ninety-three men of the Jews..." Muhammad and his men offered the fajr prayer, the Islamic dawn prayer, before it was light, and then entered Khaybar itself. The Muslims immediately set out to locate the inhabitants' wealth. A Jewish leader of Khaybar, Kinana bin al-Rabi, was brought before Muhammad; Kinana was supposed to have been entrusted with the treasure of the Jewish tribes of Arabia, the Banu Nadir. Kinana denied knowing where this treasure was, but Muhammad pressed him: "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" Kinana said yes, that he did know that.

Some of the treasure was found. To find the rest, Muhammad gave orders concerning Kinana: "Torture him until you extract what he has." One of the Muslims built a fire on Kinana's chest, but Kinana would not give up his secret. When he was at the point of death, one of the Muslims beheaded him. Kinana's wife was taken as a war prize; Muhammad claimed her for himself and hastily arranged a wedding ceremony that night. He halted the Muslims' caravan out of Khaybar later that night in order to consummate the marriage.

Muhammad agreed to let the people of Khaybar to go into exile, allowing them to keep as much of their property as they could carry. The Prophet of Islam, however, commanded them to leave behind all their gold and silver. He had intended to expel all of them, but some, who were farmers, begged him to allow them to let them stay if they gave him half their yield annually. Muhammad agreed: "I will allow you to continue here, so long as we would desire." He warned them: "If we wish to expel you we will expel you." They no longer had any rights that did not depend upon the good will and sufferance of Muhammad and the Muslims. And indeed, when the Muslims discovered some treasure that some of the Khaybar Jews had hidden, he ordered the women of the tribe enslaved and seized the perpetrators' land. A hadith notes that "the Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives."

Compassion!

"Armstrong: Islam came to spread compassion among the nations of the world," by Siddeek Tawfeek for Islam Online, March 17 (thanks to Jan):

As part of its cultural events, Georgetown University’s CIRS (Centre for International and Regional Studies), School of Foreign Services in Qatar, invited professor Karen Armstrong to deliver a lecture titled, The Core of Our Religious Traditions on 13th March 2011.

Professor Armstrong started her lecture by saying that religion has a main role in that it can provide a major contribution to build a global community where people can live in peace and harmony. She said that some believe that religion is the cause of violence and wars throughout history, refuting this concept by saying that wars and violence are motivated by greed and power. Each religion has its own particular and exclusive insights, but all religions have a thing in common, and that is the belief in the Supreme Being who is God. Words stop and fail when we begin to define God. Professor Armstrong summed up the situation by quoting in Arabic: “Allahu Akbar” (God is greater).

She pointed out that religion teaches us mainly to worship Allah and to do good, and the Qur’an calls for good actions. She quoted the Arabic word: (al-salihat) which includes doing whatever good to help people, be it kindness to orphans, and giving alms to the poor. In other words, The Qur’an calls for compassion, and compassion is the core of the Golden Rule which says: “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.” This is the bond of suffering. Professor Armstrong quoted the hadith (prophetic saying) of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), where he says: “None of you will be a true believer until he desires for others what he desires for himself.”

Professor Armstrong said that after the September 11th event, the Muslim communities in the West have been exposed to a lot of suffering inflicted upon them. Such a treatment is too far from the Golden Rule of compassion. As a reaction to this injustice toward Muslims, cities in different parts of the world have developed campaigns to promote community compassion among its residents, where Muslim youths are significantly participating in these campaigns, especially in Amsterdam, Holland. The city of Seattle in north-western United States, leads the list of compassionate cities. On the other hand, Professor Armstrong cited Afghanistan and Iraq as examples of venues where compassion is non-existent.

It is doubtful that Professor Armstrong mentioned such inconveniently non-compassionate post-9/11 (and indeed, quite recent) Muslims as Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; or Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; or Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; or Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; or Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; or Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; or Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber. Mentioning them might have interfered with her narrative of Muslim persecution in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

“Just like a mother has compassion for her child, Allah has compassion for man. There was a time when Allah’s revelation to the Prophet (PBUH) stopped and the Prophet (PBUH) felt desolate, abandoned, and depressed” she added. Later, revelation returned and the Prophet (PBUH), feeling that the grace of the Lord was proclaimed, he went public in his message. The first Sura (chapter) that was revealed to him from Allah was “Al Duha”, whose opening Ayas (verses), Professor Armstrong quoted from memory: “By the morning hours, and the night when it falls. Your Lord has neither forgotten nor forsaken you. And the hereafter is better for you than present life. And verily, your Lord will give you so that you will be pleased.”

Furthermore, Islam came to spread compassion among the tribes, and consequently among the nations of the world. Compassion is very well testified when Allah ordered the Prophet (PBUH) prayers five times a day and not fifty times. This also indicates another aspect of compassion and that is to be moderate in order to be tolerant. The Qur’an preaches compassion by avoiding the infliction of pain upon others; compassion makes us closely akin to God....

Professor Armstrong is well versed in The Qur’an and has intimate knowledge of Islamic discourse and the life of the Prophet. Whenever she mentioned his name, she followed it by the phrase: Peace Be Upon Him (PBUH)....

That's interesting. Has Karen Armstrong finally converted to Islam? Does she believe Muhammad was a prophet?

In an interview with Bill Moyers published on March 2009 at Public Broadcasting Service site, Armstrong states that "Islam is a religion of success.… Mohammed was not an apparent failure. He was a dazzling success, politically as well as spiritually, and Islam went from strength to strength to strength." Armstrong argued that “until the 20th century, Islam was a far more tolerant and peaceful faith than Christianity. The Qur’an strictly forbids any coercion in religion and regards all rightly guided religions as coming from God; and despite the Western belief to the contrary, Muslims did not impose their faith by the sword”.

Armstrong is referring to the dhimma, which was so much more tolerant and peaceful than anything Christianity offered that at the dawn of the twentieth century, there were sixteen to seventeen million Jews in Christian Europe, and one million Jews in Islamic lands. And yes, Islam did not spread by the sword; non-Muslims were subjugated as dhimmis, and made subject to so many deprivations and legalized hardships that they freely converted to Islam just to have a chance at a better life. But no, no one forced them!

In another interview, Armstrong states that "Muslims should try to use the media; they have got to have a Muslim lobby. This is a jihad, an effort, a struggle, that is very important. If you want to change the media, then you have got to make people see that Islam is a force to be reckoned with politically and culturally."

They're doing that quite well already.

| 111 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Obama Administration is considering coming to the aid of America-hating Islamic supremacists. "Libyan rebellion has radical Islamist fervor: Benghazi link to Islamic militancy:U.S. Military Document Reveals," by Daya Gamage for the Asian Tribune, March 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

Well known to the United States policymakers in Obama White House and Clinton State Department along with the National Security Council but not widely known to American mainstream media, the U.S. West Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center document reveals that Libya sent more fighters to Iraq’s Islamic militancy on a per-capita basis than any other Muslim country, including Saudi Arabia.

Perhaps more alarmingly for Western policymakers, most of the fighters came from eastern Libya, the center of the current uprising against Muammar el-Qaddafi.

The analysis of the Combating Terrorism Center of West Point was based on the records captured by coalition forces in October 2007 in a raid near Sinjar, along Iraq’s Syrian border.

The eastern Libyan city of Darnah sent more fighters to Iraq than any other single city or town, according to the West Point report. It noted that 52 militants came to Iraq from Darnah, a city of just 80,000 people (the second-largest source of fighters was Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which has a population of more than 4 million).

Benghazi, the capital of Libya’s provisional government declared by the anti-Qaddafi rebels, sent in 21 fighters, again a disproportionate number of the whole.

If the 2007 captured records revealed the Eastern Libyan participation in the anti-coalition forces militancy in Iraq one could imagine the Banghazi-Darnah export of Islamists since then.

“Libyans were more fired up to travel to Iraq to kill Americans than anyone else in the Arabic-speaking world,” Andrew Exum, a counterinsurgency specialist and former Army Ranger noted in a blog posting recently. “This might explain why those rebels from Libya's eastern provinces are not too excited about U.S. military intervention. It might also give some pause to those in the United States so eager to arm Libya's rebels.”...

Indeed.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "King Blew It," in The American Thinker today, Pamela Geller discusses how Peter King's hearings on the "radicalization" of Muslims in America fell short of what they could and should have been:

Investor's Business Daily editorialized Monday that Congressman Peter King (R-NY) "blew it" in his hearings on "Muslim radicalization," and that he "didn't even come close to delivering what he advertised with his investigation." IBD criticized King for calling as a witness Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison (D-MN), a "close ally" of the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Ellison, says the IBD editorial, "stole the show when he broke into tears while retelling the story of a Muslim paramedic who died in the World Trade Center.  Ellison used the victim as an example of the "witch hunt" against Muslims in America by claiming he was falsely accused of involvement in the 9/11 plot."

It gives me no pleasure to be right, again. But I wrote on January 18 that King was over his head. I criticized King for calling Ellison and not terror expert Steven Emerson or Islamic expert Robert Spencer, and wrote: "Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, infamous for his pro-Hamas rallies and his pilgrimage to the Hajj in Saudi Arabia, paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, is testifying, but Emerson and Spencer aren't? What can King achieve?"

All this has been proven correct. The entire enemedia coverage was all about Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Hakim Mohammed (aka Keith Ellison)'s bawling and crocodile tears over a fictitious tale. Hakim claimed that the Muslim paramedic killed on 9/11 was accused of terror ties when he went missing after that day, until his remains were found. In fact, the only mentions anywhere of his being accused of terror ties are in leftwing publications criticizing the right for these accusations - but there is no record of anyone on the right ever actually making the accusations. Also, the media never reported that Hakim Mohammed's hajj was paid for with $13,350 by the Brotherhood, that Hakim was a vocal supporter of the vile Louis Farrakhan, or that Hakim has long time ties Muslim Brotherhood and is a vocal pro-Hamas supporter. King's hearings should have been designed to expose stealth jihadists like Hakim, aka Ellison. But they fell far short of that....

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As far as Sharia supremacists are concerned, Sharia is justice, no matter how unjust it may appear to the unaided eye. "Malaysian Christian lawyer barred from Shariah courts," from the BBC, March 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

A Christian lawyer in Malaysia has failed in her attempt to be allowed to practise in the Muslim Shariah courts.

Victoria Jayaseele Martin said she wanted to appear for non-Muslim clients fighting in such courts, to provide them with fairer representation.

An increasing number of cases heard in the Islamic courts involve both Muslims and non-Muslims.

Malaysia runs two parallel legal systems.

The civil courts cater to its non-Muslim citizens while the Islamic system decides issues affecting the fate of the country's Muslim majority....

Ms Martin's lawyer, Ranjit Singh, said it was difficult for non-Muslims to find legal counsel, who may not want to defend cases that conflict with their own faith.

One of the lawyers for the Federal Territories Islamic Religious Council, Mr Abdul Rahim Sinwan, said it was "not a problem" for non-Muslims to find Muslim lawyers to defend them.

"It goes one step further because it's a question of faith. Because when the Muslim holds the opinion held by the judge, it's a question of faith, in which non-Muslims doesn't (have it)," he said.

The BBC's Jennifer Pak says he added that there was a "misunderstood perception that non-Muslim cannot find justice in the Shariah court", calling it a "fallacy."...

Of course! Sharia mandates a second-class status for non-Muslims, but why should that mean that they can't find justice?

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us


After opening to an SRO crowd at CPAC and a packed house at the St. Luke's Theatre in Manhattan, we are proud to announce a screening of The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks tonight at 7:30 p.m. at the Studio Cinema in Belmont (right outside of Boston).

Pamela Geller and I will be joined by 9/11 family members. For directions to Studio Cinema, call (617) 484-9751. For more information about the event, contact Rachel Miselman at (617) 959-2617 or via email at knowledgeinBoston@gmail.com.

The West Coast premiere will be April 9: The San Fernando Valley Patriots will co-host the West Coast premiere of The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks with special presentations by Pamela Geller and me. For information and to purchase tickets, click here.

More screenings will be announced soon.

Pamela Geller has more here.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Including nuclear warheads. "Malaysian police seize parts for weapon of mass destruction," from Cargonews Asia, March 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

Malaysian police said they have seized dismantled equipment that were meant for producing a weapon of mass destruction, including nuclear warheads, from a vessel in the country's major port, reported Xinhua.

The equipment was found in two containers on a Malaysian-registered vessel bound for Iran....

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet more indication of Turkey's abandonment of its pro-Western secularist stance, including its alliance with Israel, and embrace of the Islamic world. More on this story. "Turkey refused Israeli request to intercept cargo vessel bound to Gaza Strip," from KUNA, March 16 (thanks to Carl In Jerusalem):

GAZA, March 16 (KUNA) -- Israel affirmed Wednesday that Turkey refused an Israeli request to intercept the "Victoria" cargo vessel which, according to Israeli sources, carried weapons being smuggled to help Palestinian activities in the Gaza Strip. According to Maariv Israeli newspaper, Israel requested Ankara to intercept the cargo vessel, a request which Turkey flatly refused.

Israel had stopped the ship which was hoisting the Turkish and Liberian flags, indicated the newspaper, adding that the cargo consisted of weapons suspected to be shipped to Palestinian factions....

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Latest hollowed-out book-bomb title: Militant Jew. More on this story. "Popular singer latest target in Indonesian mail bombings," by Niniek Karmini for AP, March 17:

JAKARTA, Indonesia — A popular singer. A former anti-terror chief. An outspoken critic of Islamic extremism.

All have been targeted by parcel bombs sent by suspected Muslim extremists, leaving many in the Indonesian capital asking, "Who's next?"

Indonesia, a secular country of 237 million people, most of them Muslims, has a long history of religious tolerance. But a hard-line fringe has grown louder, and more violent, in recent years.

Critics say the government of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono — which relies on the support of Islamic parties in Parliament — is partly to blame.

By remaining largely silent, even when mobs attacked Christians and members of Ahmadiyah, a minority Muslim sect, with knives, sticks and rocks, extremists have become emboldened....

Four mail bombs have been sent this week, one exploding and injuring four as it was being detonated by police.

All arrived in hollowed-out, thick books that said "Militant Jew" or "They should be killed for their sins against Islam and the Muslims."

The first packet was addressed to Ulil Abshar Abdalla, an outspoken critic of extremism and founder of the U.S.-funded Islamic Liberal Network.

Others were sent to Lt. Gen. Gories Mere, former chief of the police anti-terror squad, and to Yapto Suryosumarno, a politician suspected of having ties to Jakarta's underworld.

The latest package was delivered to the home of Ahmad Dhani, a well-known singer who has butted heads with Islamic extremists, most recently over topless pictures of an actress.

With rumours swirling that many other parcels have been posted, talk about the bombings lit up social network sites like Facebook and Twitter on Thursday.

"Celebrities. Politicians. Who's next?" some wrote.

For others, the biggest concern was that pop star Justin Bieber and soccer sensation Giovanni van Bronckhorst might cancel planned trips to the capital....

Indonesia has been hit by a string of suicide bombings blamed on the al-Qaida-linked group Jemaah Islamiyah and other militants in the last decade, including the 2002 attacks on Bali island.

Altogether more than 260 people have died, most of them foreign tourists.

But a new terrorist cell that wants to turn the country into an Islamic state says moderate Muslims like Yudhoyono, who oversaw a security crackdown that netted hundreds of terrorist suspects, are their biggest enemies.

They accuse him and others of being infidels and lackeys of the West....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 16, 2011

Curiouser and curiouser. An update on this story. "U.S. denies paid compensation over Pakistan killings," from Reuters, March 16 (thanks to Block Ness):

CAIRO (Reuters) – The United States did not pay compensation to the families of two Pakistanis killed by a CIA contractor who was acquitted of their murder on Wednesday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.

The contractor, Raymond Davis, 36, was acquitted and released by a Pakistani court after a deal to pay "blood money" to the victims' families, Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah told Reuters earlier on Wednesday.

Clinton told reporters in Cairo: "The United States did not pay any compensation." Asked who did, she replied: "You will have to ask the families."

She also refused to say if the Pakistani government had paid, saying: "You will have to ask the Pakistani government."...

"We have communicated our strong support for the relationship between Pakistan and the United States which we consider to be of strategic importance and are looking forward to continuing to strengthen it based on mutual respect and common interest, " Clinton said.

Powerful religious parties in Pakistan condemned the release and analysts said there was a risk of a backlash against the government.

Don't those greasy Islamophobes know that a "backlash" can only happen against Muslims?

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

PrayerAboveYoavsBed.jpg


"That I be gracious and merciful in the eyes of all who see me." And the death-loving barbarians who loudly insist that their bloodthirsty god is gracious and merciful slaughtered him in his bed.

"11-Year-Old Yoav's Legacy: 'Love Everyone,'" by Chana Ya'ar for Israel National News, March 16 (thanks to Amber):

First responders who rushed into the blood-drenched bedroom of 11-year-old Yoav Fogel last Friday night were confronted with a sight that nearly stopped them in their tracks.

A colorful little wooden plaque hung above the slain young boy's bed, proclaiming his love for his people and a prayer for peace between all.[...]

May it be Your will, L-rd G-d and G-d of our forefathers,

That I love every one of Israel as myself, and

To graciously perform the positive commandment of loving your neighbor as yourself.[...]

That I be gracious and merciful in the eyes of all who see me.[...]

Along with his 4-year-old brother Elad and his new little baby sister, 3-month-old Hadas, Yoav and both of his parents were stabbed to death by terrorists who murdered them as they slept....

| 57 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Somehow the senders of these book-bombs have gotten the idea that someone who "sins against Islam and Muslims" must be killed. And where are all the peaceful, moderate Muslim voices working to convince them that that isn't so? How many hundreds or thousands of times must they be AWOL on occasions like this before the non-Muslim world begins to get a clue as to the reality of the situation?

Pancasila is the official philosophy of Indonesia. It is not strictly Islamic, and Islamic supremacists view it as a rival to Sharia; hence the other book title, Does the Pancasila Still Exist. "Bomb for Yapto disguised as book on Pancasila," from The Jakarta Post, March 16:

The book containing a bomb sent to Pancasila Youth organization chairman Yapto Soerjosoemarno on Tuesday bore a different title to the book-bombs sent to politician and Islamic Activist Ulil Abshar Abdhalla and National Narcotics Body Chief Gories Mere.

While bombs sent to Ulil and Gories were put in books titled Mereka Harus Dibunuh Karena Dosa-dosa mereka Terhadap Islam dan Kaum Muslimin, (They Must be Killed for their Sins Against Islam and Muslims), the book-bomb addressed to Yapto was titled Apakah Masih Ada Pancasila (Does the Pancasila Still Exist).

Jakarta Police chief Insp. Gen. Sutarman said Wednesday that the bombs, however, were similar types.

He said the Jakarta Police were yet to determine the group responsible for the bombs, “But they are definitely terrorists” he added....

No kidding, really?

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They made her take off her hijab for security reasons, but who cares about security when Muslim practices must be accommodated?

"Muslim defendant can sue over hijab removal," by Bob Egelko for the San Francisco Chronicle, March 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):

SAN FRANCISCO -- A law guaranteeing religious freedom to prisoners applies to a courthouse holding cell where sheriff's deputies ordered a Muslim woman to remove her headscarf, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The 11-0 decision by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a lawsuit by Souhair Khatib against Orange County, where officers made her take off her hijab for security reasons while she was held in the cell to await a court hearing.

The law, passed by Congress in 2000, prohibits the government from imposing a "substantial burden" on prisoners' religious practices unless officials can show a compelling need for the restrictions.

The Obama administration joined Khatib in arguing that the law applied to courthouse holding cells....

The court returned the case to a federal judge to decide whether the deputies interfered with Khatib's religious freedom without a compelling security need. Becky Kieffer, a lawyer for Khatib, said federal prisons allow Muslim women to wear approved headscarves and that the county should follow their practice.

The county could also appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Khatib and her husband pleaded guilty in 2006 to a misdemeanor welfare crime, which Kieffer said involved receiving overpayments. They were placed on probation and ordered to perform 30 hours of community service apiece.

When they went to court to ask for an extension of the community service deadline, a judge revoked their probation and put them in holding cells, where deputies ordered Khatib to remove her hijab.

She stayed in the cell most of the day, trying to cover her head with her vest. When she was brought into court, the judge extended the deadline and restored her probation.

Khatib says her religion forbids her to expose her head or neck to men outside her immediate family. She sued the county for damages.

| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is a concern only in Britain? And does anyone care now, or did they only care in 2006? "US terrorist concern on UK sharia banks -WikiLeaks," from Reuters, March 15:

LONDON, March 15 (Reuters) - U.S. authorities expressed concerns that Britain's growing sharia banking sector may be exploited to channel funds to terrorists, the Daily Telegraph reported, citing diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.

According to WikiLeaks, the U.S. State Department's concerns were such that it ordered diplomats in London to compile a report on the activities of sharia banks in Britain.

The report cited a cable sent from the office of Condoleezza Rice, former President George Bush's then Secretary of State, in June 2006.

This cable requested information on "Islamic financial institutions' vulnerability to exploitation for illicit or terrorist purposes, such as structuring accounts to mask illicit activity or money laundering", the report said.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An American intervention would likely aid jihadists. So in "Libya: What to do?," by Raymond Ibrahim in National Review Online (via RaymondIbrahim.com), March 10, Raymond says that without a clear and focused objective, the U.S. should not intervene. Good advice, not often enough heeded:

That Qaddafi is an anti-American and tyrannical thug, there is no doubt. But unless this administration has a clear and focused policy on what it wants to accomplish in Libya—one that does not include cozying up to Islamists or that is built solely atop temporary economic considerations—it may be best to let the Middle East's latest survival-of-the-fittest installment play out, and go from there.

Read it all.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

If you're accused of blasphemy in Pakistan, your life is essentially over. If the governing authorities don't get you, jihadist vigilantes will. This is a human rights issue crying out for the world community to address, but no one has the courage to do so, because doing so might offend Islam.

"Pakistani Christian Sentenced for ‘Blasphemy’ Dies in Prison," from Compass Direct News, March 15 (thanks to all who sent this in):

LAHORE, Pakistan, March 15 (CDN) — A Christian serving a life sentence in Karachi Central Jail on accusations that he had sent text messages blaspheming the prophet of Islam died today amid suspicions that he was murdered.

Qamar David’s life had been threatened since he and a Muslim, Munawar Ahmad, were accused of sending derogatory text messages about Muhammad in June 2006, said David’s former lawyer, Pervaiz Chaudhry (See “Pakistan’s ‘Blasphemy’ Laws Claim Three More Christians,” March 10, 2010).

David was convicted under Section 295-C under Pakistan’s widely condemned blasphemy laws for derogatory remarks against Muhammad in a case registered at Karachi’s Azizabad Police Station, with another case registered at Saddar Police Station pending. Maximum punishment for Section 295-C is death, though life imprisonment is also possible. On Feb. 25, 2010 he received a sentence of life in prison, which in Pakistan is 25 years, and was fined 100,000 rupees (US$1,170).

Chaudhry, who said he was David’s counsel until Islamic threats against his life forced him to stop in July 2010, told Compass that the Christian had expressed fears for his life several times during the trial.

David did not die of a heart attack as the jail officials are claiming,” Chaudhry said. “He was being threatened ever since the trial began, and he had also submitted a written application with the jail authorities for provision of security, but no step was taken in this regard.”

Conflicting versions of his death by jail officials also raised doubts....

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

$2.34 million!

The Islamic principle of qisas, or retaliation, allows for blood money (diyya) to be paid by the perpetrator to the relatives of the deceased in cases of accidental death or even murder. This is not just an Islamic ritual; it is part of Islamic law and suffices as punishment for the murder if the relatives of the deceased agree.

In any case, the amount of compensation required is higher if the victim was a Muslim than if he was a non-Muslim. Only the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence allows for the possibility of capital punishment in the case of a Muslim who has murdered an unbeliever. The Maliki and Hanbali schools set a Muslim's life as worth twice that of a non-Muslim. The Shafi'i school sets a Jew's or Christian's life as worth two-thirds that of a Muslim. Polytheists are valued less. The Shafi'i Sharia manual 'Umdat al-Salik dictates: "The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth that of a Muslim." (o4.9)

The Iranian Shi'ite Sufi Sheikh Sultanhussein Tabandeh explains: "Thus if [a] Muslim commits adultery his punishment is 100 lashes, the shaving of his head, and one year of banishment. But if the man is not a Muslim and commits adultery with a Muslim woman his penalty is execution...Similarly if a Muslim deliberately murders another Muslim he falls under the law of retaliation and must by law be put to death by the next of kin. But if a non-Muslim who dies at the hand of a Muslim has by lifelong habit been a non-Muslim, the penalty of death is not valid. Instead the Muslim murderer must pay a fine and be punished with the lash....Since Islam regards non-Muslims as on a lower level of belief and conviction, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim...then his punishment must not be the retaliatory death, since the faith and conviction he possesses is loftier than that of the man slain...Again, the penalties of a non-Muslim guilty of fornication with a Muslim woman are augmented because, in addition to the crime against morality, social duty and religion, he has committed sacrilege, in that he has disgraced a Muslim and thereby cast scorn upon the Muslims in general, and so must be executed....Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them." -- Sultanhussein Tabandeh, A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

And why is the U.S. submitting to Sharia in this regard? In better days, a team of commandos would have done the job.

"Pakistan: CIA contractor released after '$2.34mln in blood is money paid,'" from AKI, March 16 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Lahore, 16 March (AKI) - A Pakistani court on Wednesday freed an American CIA contractor hours after he was formally charged with two counts of murder, officials said.

Raymond Davis, 36, shot dead two men in the eastern city of Lahore on 27 January. He said he defended himself during an armed robbery.

Davis was acquitted after family members of the victims received "blood money" as compensation in accordance with sharia law, Pakistani English-language daily Dawn cited Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah as saying.

A lawyer for the families of two Pakistani men killed by an American CIA contractor says the United States paid $2.34 million in "blood money" to secure the man's release, according to an Associated Press report....

United States ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter on the release of Davis said :”I wish to express my respect for Pakistan and its people, and my thanks for their commitment to building our relationship.”...

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

You wouldn't want to offend Muslims, now, would you?

Here is a telling indication of how moral relativism encourages the worst forms of barbarity. "Honour killings term angers Trudeau," by Bryn Weese for the Toronto Sun, March 15 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

OTTAWA - Liberal MP Justin Trudeau said the government should not call honour killings "barbaric" in a study guide for would-be Canadian citizens.

On Monday, the federal government updated its Discover Canada guide, a pamphlet given to new immigrants to help explain life in Canada and prepare them for the citizenship test.

Among other things, it tells new Canadians that gay marriage is OK and forced marriages are not.

But the guide also says: "Canada's openness and generosity do not extend to barbaric cultural practices that tolerate spousal abuse, 'honour killings,' female genital mutilation, forced marriage or other gender-based violence."

"Those guilty of these crimes are severely punished under Canada's criminal laws," it reads.

Trudeau blasted the Conservatives for using the term "barbaric," even though it's been in the guide since 2009. Forced marriages are the only new item on the list.

"There's nothing that the word 'barbaric' achieves that the words 'absolutely unacceptable' would not have achieved," Trudeau, the Liberal immigration critic, said.

"We accept that these acts are absolutely unacceptable. That's not the debate. In casual conversation, I'd even use the word barbaric to describe female circumcision, for example, but in an official Government of Canada publication, there needs to be a little bit of an attempt at responsible neutrality."

But Immigration Minister Jason Kenney fired back Monday, accusing the Liberals of choosing political correctness over women's rights.

"Despite Trudeau's opposition, we make no apologies for letting immigrant women know their rights. We won't turn a blind eye to the abuse of immigrant women, even if the Ignatieff Liberals prefer we err on the side of political correctness," said Alykhan Velshi, a spokesman for Kenney....

Good.

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Israeli Apartheid Week, staged on campuses all over the U.S. as well as Canada, usually with the participation of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Students Association, was always grotesque and based on the monstrous falsehoods churned out by the Palestinian propaganda industry and eagerly disseminated by the mainstream media. Now, after the brutal jihad murders of the Fogel family and the celebration of those murders by the savages in Gaza, it is something even worse than that. So Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney deserve props for speaking out. Is there any American official with the guts to do the same?

"Ottawa slams Israeli Apartheid Week," by Sarah Boesveld, with files from Tamsin McMahon, for the National Post, March 11 (thanks to all who sent this in):

There is a growing Canadian backlash against Israeli Apartheid Week, the on-campus campaign to delegitimize Israel.

Yikes, a "backlash"! Hide the children! Are machete-wielding Canadians marauding through Muslim neighborhoods, slashing terrified hijab-wearing innocents? Are stone-throwing Canadians surrounding mosques, breaking windows and chanting anti-Muslim slogans?

Uh, no. The Immigration Minister issued a "strongly-worded statement."

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney issued a strongly worded statement Friday, asking students to think twice before joining activities tied to the week, taking place across Canada and internationally this month.

The events, which seek to promote Palestinian human rights, are frequently “accompanied by anti-Semitic harassment, intimidation and bullying,” Mr. Kenney said, and are at times planned and promoted with disregard for the safety of Jewish students, professors and others on campus.

“These activities can cultivate an atmosphere exactly the opposite of one that is open to the free exchange of ideas and the development of the mind with the aid of facts and logic,” he said. Repeatedly singling out and condemning Israel year after year creates a “hateful environment” that “offends not only our sense of fairness, but also our core Canadian values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law.”

“Such scapegoating becomes yet another symptom of a worrying new acceptance of the vilification of Israel and of Jews around the world.”

At a Canadian Jewish Political Affairs Community fundraiser Thursday evening, Prime Minister Stephen Harper slammed anti-Semitism on Canadian campuses, saying the organized Israeli Apartheid Weeks had become increasingly sophisticated and “intellectually acceptable.”

“At one time, friends, we could’ve expected threatening behaviour toward Jewish students to be rejected in any form at institutions of higher learning,” he told a crowd gathered at the Royal Conservatory of Music in Toronto. “Unfortunately, it is now often the behaviour of the anti-Israeli mob that is allowed to prevail.”...

Israeli Apartheid Week is taking place in over 90 cities around the world this year, organizers say.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No more "phoning home" sermons for Feiz Muhammad. That and much more background on his story can be found here. "Radical Muslim cleric returns to Australia," from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, March 15 (thanks to Twostellas):

SYDNEY, Australia -- A radical Muslim cleric who described Jews as “pigs” and is accused of inciting terrorism has returned to Australia to preach after years in exile.
Sheik Feiz Mohammed, a Sydney native, was told in 2007 by then-Prime Minister Kevin Rudd that he was “not welcome here” after an inflammatory DVD series emerged in which he is quoted saying that “We want to have children and offer them as soldiers defending Islam. Teach them this: There is nothing more beloved to me than wanting to die as a mujahid [holy warrior].”

The set of DVDs was given a PG rating, labeling it as suitable for children and teenagers.

Media reports this week said Mohammed was back in Sydney teaching at mosques, which drew the ire of New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies CEO Vic Alhadeff.
“We deplore the use of any such language against any group,” Alhadeff said. “Bringing such hatred to Australia is not what we’re about, and most Australians unequivocally condemn such vicious bigotry.”
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Two concerned women priests with the Church of Sweden have rightly expressed concerns over whether the imam genuinely shares the same "core values" with the Church. For reasons Mark Durie explained here, there is also the matter of Islamic Friday prayers to be held in a church-owned facility.

In any event, the penalty for apostasy from Islam is death, and has been since Muhammad commanded it. Swedish authorities appear to have picked up on that connection on some level. "Säpo warns Swedish imam over internet threat," from the The Local, March 15 (thanks to Twostellas):

Swedish security service Säpo have expressed concerns about the safety of a Swedish imam who was recently hired by the Church of Sweden to work with teenagers at a Stockholm youth centre.
Imam Othman Al Tawalbeh made headlines in Sweden last week after it was revealed that he had been hired to work with children at Fryshuset, a youth centre in Stockholm run by the Church of Sweden.
The idea behind the appointment was to provide spiritual guidance for the couple of thousand children with a Muslim background who regularly visit the youth centre.
But when foreign ministry officials discovered internet postings which portrayed Al Tawalbeh in a negative light, they reported the postings to the Stockholm police, who handed the matter over to Säpo.
"They said that they are concerned for my welfare and that they are taking the matter seriously," Al Tawalbeh told local newspaper Helsingborgs Dagbladet.
The texts, which are written in Arabic and have found their way into established Arab newspapers, describe Al Tawalbeh as an apostate, someone who has left the true faith.
According to Al Tawalbeh, the author is Mahmoud Aldebe, a prominent Swedish Muslim who caused headlines in 2006 when he was advocating Sharia laws in Sweden.
“He claims that most people think that I poison the true Muslim faith, that I will try to turn Muslim youngsters into Christians and that I advocate women’s rights,” Al Tawalbeh told HD.
Al Tawalbeh said he is used to being criticised but that this time it is more serious.
“Family and friends are worried and have contacted me to find out what is going on,” he said.
The police confirmed that Säpo has been in contact with Al Tawalbeh but told HD that it is too early to say how serious a threat he is facing.
The Church of Sweden has also been criticised for the appointment of Al Tawalbeh.
On Sunday two Swedish female priests wrote an article in the Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) newspaper in which they questioned the appointment of an imam by a foundation run by the Church of Sweden.
Annika Borg and Johanna Andersson argued in the article that a prerequisite of being employed by the Church of Sweden had so far been to share the same core values, whether employed as a priest or as a janitor.
“It is our opinion that the appointment of an imam is unfortunate. It is a step taken too rashly and without proper consideration,” they wrote in SvD.
Despite the possible threat, Al Tawalbeh is eager to be getting on with his new job and his first prayers are scheduled to take place at Fryshuset in Stockholm this coming Friday.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. The fact remains that such distribution is ultimately at the mercy of Malaysian authorities' whims, and these Bibles were deemed suitable only because they were stamped with a message proclaiming them for Christian use only.

Qur'an 29:46 does say "Our Allah and your Allah is One, and unto Him we surrender," but it is a talking point for Islamic proselytizing, and a one-way line of discourse, in a manner in which a non-Muslim would be prohibited from preaching to a Muslim under Islamic law. "Malaysia releases Malay-language Bibles impounded for using 'Allah'," from Deutsche Presse-Agentur, March 15 (thanks to Twostellas):

Kuala Lumpur -Bowing to pressure, the Malaysian government said Tuesday it would release 35,000 Malay-language Christian Bibles which refer to God as 'Allah.'
Customs impounded the books as the government of mainly-Muslim Malaysia has insisted the word should be used exclusively in the context of Islam.

That would force non-Muslims to use another name, setting up a Catch-22 whereby Muslims could say, "See? They don't worship Allah!"

The release was in line with a 1982 regulation which allows 'limited and controlled importation and circulation' of Malay-language Bibles which must be stamped 'For Christian Only,' explained Idris Jala, a minister of the Prime Minister's Department.
'This is a reasonable compromise in managing the polarities of views between Christians and Muslims in the country,' he said in a statement
Christian groups said at least 35,000 Bibles imported from Indonesia are being held by customs. Some 5,000 have been impounded since March 2009.
Home Minister Hishamuddin Hussein claimed they were held due to the pending court case over the use of the word 'Allah.'
The government is appealing against a High Court decision from December, 2009 which allowed the Malaysian Roman Catholic Church to use the word 'Allah' in its newsletter, the Herald.

Insulting Muslims' intelligence for the sake of sticking it to the kuffar:

The government has requested that Christians be banned from using the word, for fear it might 'confuse' the Muslims who make up over 60 percent of the country's 28 million population. Proselytizing is illegal in Malaysia.

For non-Muslims.

However, the Bibles' importer, the Bible Society of Malaysia, said it has letters from the government approving the release of the consignment but still the authorities refused to release them.
It is estimated that there are over 2.5 million Christians in Malaysia. Some 85 percent of them reside in Sabah and Sarawak states on Borneo island, where majority of them use the Malay language during church services.

A 400-year-old Malay-Latin dictionary shows how long the usage of "Allah" has been common.

The 2009 High Court set off a firestorm. Angry Muslims attacked at least eight churches with petrol bombs and defaced one with paint.
The confiscation of the Bibles has added further added tension to the fragile races relation [sic] in this multi-ethnic country.

The Malaysian constitution defines Malays as Muslims, but nonetheless, neither Christianity nor Islam is a race, and the conflict is clearly about religion.

Last Thursday, the Christian Federation of Malaysia rebuked the government saying Christians are 'greatly disillusioned, fed up and angered' over the repeated detention of Malay-language Bibles.
'The freedom of religion guaranteed as part of the fundamental liberties under our Federal Constitution is rendered meaningless if adherents to a religion are denied access to their religious texts in a language that they can understand,' CFM chairman Bishop Ng Moon Hing said in a statement.
There have been other instances where Bibles and also other religious materials such as CDs and books have been impounded for the same reason, resulting in several legal suits taken out by Christian groups against the government....
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 15, 2011

When this story first broke, the Muslim community was quick to complain it felt "stressed" over the investigation -- not so much, apparently, over the suspects' disappearance or their potential victims. This, of course, has become standard operating procedure: try to deflect attention by claiming victim status, and silence the discussion by portraying any scrutiny from outside the community as a form of (or prelude to) persecution.

"Mounties lay terror charges against missing Canadians," by Colin Freeze and Greg McArthur for the Globe and Mail, March 15 (thanks to Dave):

The RCMP have charged two Canadians with terrorism-related offences in connection to a 2009 plot to blow up packed subway cars in New York.
The RCMP allege that the al-Qaeda terrorists behind the plot were trained by a University of Manitoba student who has disappeared from Canada.
Ferid Imam vanished from Winnipeg in 2007 and is now suspected of being in the lawless mountains of northwestern Pakistan. He is now being sought on terrorist-training charges as part of a new criminal case.
The case, which alleges lesser offences by a second suspect, amounts to a crucial test of the reach of Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act. Passed shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, it allows police to charge suspects who are suspected of committing terrorist offences outside Canada’s borders. The new case is the first time that the Mounties have charged someone with acts taking place entirely overseas.
Police hope the case against Mr. Imam – who faces a life sentence if he is caught and convicted of being a terrorist trainer – will alert the public about what they say is the growing threat posed by radicals from the West who want to join al-Qaeda and its affiliates.
The charges are new, but the investigation is not. Several counterterrorism agencies have been quietly hunting Mr. Imam over the years. But by obtaining warrants from a Winnipeg court on Monday, the Mounties have made the manhunt official – and laid a claim to the suspects by alleging they are fugitives from Canadian justice.
RCMP allege that Mr. Imam, while in Pakistan, had a role in training Najibullah Zazi – the Afghanistan-born New Yorker who has already pleaded guilty to plotting to bomb the subway system. [...]
Washington officials are growing more fearful about the prospect that “homegrown” terrorist attacks could cause carnage on U.S. streets. The fear is shared by officials in Ottawa, who face the added nightmare than any Canadian connection to any terrorist attack may lead U.S. lawmakers to tighten up the border – threatening billions of dollars in bilateral trade....
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
SIOAflier.jpgSIOA flier distributed at a recent rally


The mere fact of Congressman Peter King's hearings on "radicalization" of Muslims in the U.S. aroused a great deal of hysterical fury and wild accusations from American Muslim advocacy groups, and that was revealing to Americans who may not have realized how subversive those groups really are. But the hearings themselves didn't illuminate much of anything, as I predicted in January after King started caving to Islamic supremacist pressure over his witness list.

"King Hearing Falls Short, As Predicted," from Investor's Business Daily, March 14 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Reviews of Rep. Pete King’s opening round of hearings into “Muslim radicalization” are lousy. King blames the Muslim lobby and the media. But he’s the one who blew it.

King, the Republican head of the House Homeland Security Committee, deserves thrashing not because the hearing was an exercise in Muslim-bashing, as Democrats and the media unfairly charged. Far from it, the tenor of the questioning was respectful.

The problem, rather, was King didn't even come close to delivering what he advertised with his investigation, titled "The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response."...

The lead-off witness was Rep. Keith Ellison, a Muslim Democrat from Minneapolis who has tried to shut down the hearings since King first announced them. His top billing was an odd choice, to be sure. But King said he invited him "as an example of my good faith."

His gesture backfired, as we predicted days before the hearing ("Rep. King: Don't Pull Any Punches," March 9), when we noticed Ellison headlining the witness list.

Ellison, another close ally of CAIR, stole the show when he broke into tears while retelling the story of a Muslim paramedic who died in the World Trade Center. Ellison used the victim as an example of the "witch hunt" against Muslims in America by claiming he was falsely accused of involvement in the 9/11 plot.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Shaikh Abdul Malek Ramdani must be some kind of Islamophobe. "Cleric issues 48-page fatwa against democracy," from Reuters, March 16 (thanks to Twostellas):

Algiers: The spiritual leader of Algeria's influential Salafist movement has issued a 48-page fatwa, or religious decree, urging Muslims to ignore calls for change because he says that democracy goes against Islam.

The fatwa by Shaikh Abdul Malek Ramdani, who lives in Saudi Arabia, comes at an opportune time for President Abdul Aziz Bouteflika as Algerians watching protests in other Arab states have begun pushing their own political and economic demands.

"As long as the commander of the nation is a Muslim, you must obey and listen to him. Those who are against him are just seeking to replace him, and this is not licit," Ramdani wrote in the fatwa obtained by Reuters.

"During unrest, men and women are mixed, and this is illicit in our religion," said Ramdani, who claims several hundred thousand followers in Algiers....

Ramdani, who moved to Saudi Arabia after threats from Islamists, wrote in his ‘fatwa on unrest' that an observant Muslim can only "pray and be patient" when faced with an unwanted ruler. "Unrest is a tool created by democratic systems which are against Islam."

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is yet another chapter in our ongoing series, Why We Don't See More Genuine Islamic Reformers: "Bomb explodes at Indonesian Islam group HQ: police," from AFP, March 15:

JAKARTA — A bomb exploded at the office of a moderate Islamic group in the Indonesian capital Jakarta on Tuesday, injuring four people including a police officer, police and a witness said.

The device was in a package sent to the office of the Liberal Islam Network (JIL), a grouping of religious intellectuals, in East Jakarta, national police spokesman Boy Rafli Amar told reporters.

"We suspected that it was a bomb. Our officers were trying to tame it when it went off," he said, adding that the police are investigating the motive.

A witness told local television station MetroTV that the package was addressed to the group's former director and liberal Muslim scholar Ulil Abshar Abdalla....

Abdalla, who graduated from a US university, is a well-known liberal Muslim figure who espouses pluralism and religious tolerance.

He regularly speaks out against Islamic hardliners through the microblogging website Twitter, where he has 50,000 followers....

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"They sprayed the building with automatic gunfire and then detonated a car bomb, which shattered windows and damaged the roof," and still didn't kill anyone: failed jihadis.

"Islamic militants wound 7 police officers in Russia's province of Dagestan," from The Associated Press, March 15:

MAKHACHKALA, Russia — Police in Russia's restive southern province of Dagestan say that seven policemen have been wounded by militants.

Local police spokesman Vyacheslav Gasanov said that several gunmen drove to a police precinct in the town of Kizilyurt late Monday. They sprayed the building with automatic gunfire and then detonated a car bomb, which shattered windows and damaged the roof.

In a separate incident Tuesday, police shot and killed three suspected militants on the outskirts of the provincial capital, Makhachkala....

Dagestan has emerged as the main base for Islamic militants, who launch near daily attacks on police and other authorities.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

BayPeople4.jpgThe patriots (foreground) far outnumbered the Islamic supremacists and their tools


BayPeople.jpgThe Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood's chief American arm, is behind this mosque project


BayPeople3.jpgMuslims in America have taken no steps to ensure this kind of thing won't happen here


Almontaser.jpgThere supporting the Muslim Brotherhood mosque was Dhabah Almontaser, former head of the notorious Brooklyn public madrassa. She went to great lengths to avoid having her picture taken -- why? Does she have something to hide?


GellerSpencerBayPeoplesm.jpgSIOA leadership was there, too!


On Sunday Pamela Geller, Pamela Hall, Chris Logan (click on each name for their reports) and I went out to Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn, where the Muslim American Society, a Muslim Brotherhood organization, is building a mega-mosque on a quiet residential street, in defiance of stop-work orders and the clear wishes of the neighboring community.

The Islamic supremacists and their Leftist dupes were out in force, but were outnumbered and outclassed. As always, we brought the facts, they brought the smears and sloganeering.

Eye on the World has a good report also.

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Moderates." "U.S.-trained forces arrested in bloody slaying of kids," by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily, March 14 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

JERUSALEM – Two members of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' official security forces were arrested in conjunction with this past weekend's bloody massacre in which five family members were brutally stabbed to death inside their home in the Jewish village of Itamar, WND has learned.

The names of the apprehended suspects will be released to the Israeli media within hours but were revealed to WND by security officials working on the murder.

Two cousins are now in Israeli custody and are suspected in the slayings. Ahmed Awad is an officer in Abbas' Preventative Security Services in the northern West Bank city of Nablis. Iyad Awad is an officer in Abbas' General Intelligence services in Ramallah.

Both the Preventative and General Intelligence services of Fatah are armed, trained and funded by the U.S.

The duo did not personally carry out the murders, but rather they assisting in the planning and logistics, informed security sources told WND.

Since the late 1990s, the U.S. has run training bases for PA militias. The U.S. also has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in financial aid and weapons to build up the PA militias....

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And of course, they're playing the victim card. What else? "Somali pirates sentenced in Va. to life in prison," from AP, March 15 (thanks to Block Ness):

NORFOLK, Va. (AP) -- Five Somali men convicted of attacking a Navy ship were sentenced to life in prison on Monday, the harshest sentences yet for accused pirates as the U.S. tries to halt piracy off Africa's coast....

"I'm being judged on the basis of something I did not commit," said Gabul Abdullah Ali.

Defense lawyers had argued the men were innocent fishermen who had been abducted by pirates and forced to fire their weapons at the ship.

But federal prosecutors argued during trial that the five had confessed to attacking the ship on April 1 after mistaking it for a merchant ship. The Nicholas, a frigate based in Norfolk, was part of an international flotilla fighting piracy in the seas off Somalia....

One of them, Abdi Mohammed Umar, said he didn't understand why he was being sentenced to prison.

"I did not kill anybody. I did not rob anybody. I didn't attack anybody," he said through an interpreter. "I'd like to be told the reason I am found guilty in this case."

Davis reminded Umar that a jury had heard the evidence and found him guilty of multiple charges....

Oh yeah.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not just "extremists." "Mosques Flourish in America; Churches Perish in Muslim World," by our old pal Raymond Ibrahim in Pajamas Media (via RaymondIbrahim.com), March 3:

As Muslims prepare to erect a mega-mosque near the site of the 9/11 atrocities, it is well to reflect that the sort of tolerance, or indifference, that allows them to do so, is far from reciprocated to churches in the Muslim world.

Just one point: the mega-mosque is not going up "near the site of the 9/11 atrocities," but right on that site. The Burlington Coat Factory building that is slated to be torn down to make way for the mosque was severely damaged when the landing gear from one of the hijacked planes crashed into its roof on September 11, 2001. The site is part of Ground Zero.

I speak not of Islamist attacks against churches—such as the New Year attack in Egypt that killed 21 Christians; or when jihadists stormed a church in Iraq, butchering over 50 Christians; or Christmas Eve attacks on churches in Nigeria and the Philippines. Nor am I referring to state-sanctioned hostility by avowedly Islamist regimes, such as Iran's recent "round up" of Christians.

Rather, I refer to anti-church policy by Middle East governments deemed "moderate." Consider: Kuwait just denied, without explanation, a request to build a church; so did Indonesia, forcing Christians to celebrate Christmas in a parking lot—even as a mob of 1,000 Muslims burned down two other churches. If this is the fate of churches in "moderate" Indonesia and Kuwait—the latter's sovereignty due entirely to U.S. sacrifices in the First Gulf War—what can be expected of the rest of the Islamic world?

The best example of anti-church policy is Egypt, where the Middle East's largest Christian minority, the Copts, lives. During Mubarak's tenure alone "more than 1500 assaults on Copts have occurred, without any appropriate punishment given to criminals or compensation to the victims," says Coptic Solidarity.

For starters, Egypt's state security has a curious habit of disappearing right before Coptic churches are attacked—such as in the aforementioned New Year attack. They also tend to arrive rather late after churches are attacked: it took security "hours" to appear when six Copts were murdered while exiting their church last year. Considering that weeks ago an Egyptian policeman identified and opened fire on Christians, killing a 71-year-old—while yelling Islam's medieval war-cry, "Allah Akbar!"—none of this should be surprising....

Read it all.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Watch for the international outcry that ensues whenever Israel acts in its own defense. "Israel seizes ship with Iran arms for Gaza: Netanyahu," by Jeffrey Heller for Reuters, March 14:

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israeli naval commandos on Tuesday seized a cargo ship in the Mediterranean carrying what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said were Iranian-supplied weapons intended for Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip.

A military spokeswoman said Israeli forces met no resistance when they intercepted the German-owned "Victoria" some 200 miles from Israel and were taking the vessel to the Israeli port of Ashdod.

Israel maintains a land and naval blockade of the Gaza Strip, a coastal enclave controlled by Hamas, an Islamist movement opposed to peace with the Jewish state.

The military said the vessel had set off from the Syrian port of Latakia and stopped in Mersin, Turkey, before heading toward Alexandria in Egypt. Turkey has no involvement in the arms shipment, the military said....

"Many weapons were found on board, intended for terrorist forces in the heart of Gaza," Netanyahu said. "Iran is the source of the weaponry."...

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a wide-ranging interview of my colleague Pamela Geller on Quebec TV, who remains focused and informative in the face of openly hostile questioning, hectoring, and frequent interruptions from Richard Martineau, the journalist/propagandist who is conducting the interview. The principal topic is her book The Post-American Presidency, which I co-wrote. Pamela Geller has more on this here.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

KingHearings.jpg


Discussing the inevitable and unsurprising in Human Events this morning:

Despite an all-out propaganda offensive by the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and its useful idiots in the mainstream media, Rep. Peter King (R.-N.Y.) went ahead last week with his hearings on the radicalization of Muslims in the U.S. King had allowed himself to be cowed by his opponents, striking several useful witnesses he had originally announced he was going to call after complaints from CAIR and other Islamic supremacist pressure groups, but his hearings went wonderfully well anyway—if only in exposing the mendacity and absolute unwillingness of Muslims in America to confront Islamic jihad activity in their midst.

Just the fact of the hearings themselves had the Left and its Islamic supremacist allies in a tizzy, which in itself demonstrated that they had something to hide—and that they knew that we knew. So they went into full-bore fearmongering mode: Rep. Bennie Thompson (D.-Miss.) declared: “I cannot help but wonder how propaganda about this hearing’s focus on the American Muslim community will be used by those who seek to inspire a new generation of suicide bombers.” In other words, don’t fight back against the jihadists, for if you do, they will hit us again. Of course, if we don’t fight back against them, they will hit us again anyway, but at least our politically correct multiculturalist smugness will be intact.

Rep. Keith Ellison (D.-Minn.), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for by the Muslim American Society, an organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, tried to steal the show by bursting into tears while reading an account of a Muslim who was killed on Sept. 11, 2002, and who had been, Ellison alleged, accused of jihad terror sympathies. But Ellison’s widely reported crocodile tears are in service of a deception. His claim that the Muslim 9/11 victim had been accused of terror links proved to be false. What’s more, the existence of Muslims who truly accept American constitutional freedoms does not mitigate or refute the existence of jihadists, jihad sympathizers, and Islamic supremacists among Muslims in the U.S., and vice versa. This would be an elementary point taken for granted by everyone were it not for the determined efforts of Ellison and his allies to obfuscate it.

Back in Ellison’s home state, Minnesota Public Radio ran a hand-wringing piece about local Muslims’ fear of a “backlash” in the wake of the King hearings. In a sane world, Minnesota Public Radio would be running material about how the Muslim community in Minneapolis and elsewhere was working hard to prove its loyalty to American constitutional values, and instituting programs to teach against the understanding of Islam manifested by Islamic jihadists. Instead, they’re the victims, as always. The media once again trotted out the tired line that Muslims are being persecuted even as the death toll from Islamic jihad attacks worldwide continues to mount....

There is more.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

March 14, 2011

Background on the National Iranian-American Council can be found here; Reza Aslan is a board member.

One official claimed ignorance of what the group stands for. If nothing else, that points to quite a lack of due diligence in vetting groups for events such as this, in a Senate office building of all places. "State Department senior official to attend conference of org accused of being advocate for Iranian theocracy," by Neal Munro for the Daily Caller, March 14 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

The State Department is sending a senior official to attend a March 15 meeting hosted by the National Iranian-American Council, which has been derided by critics as a thinly-veiled advocate for Iran’s Islamic theocracy.
Suzanne Nossel, the deputy assistant secretary of state for international organizations is slated to speak at the event, titled “Answering the Iranian People’s Call for Human Rights,” which will be held in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
The conference’s theme matches NIAC’s strategy of promoting modest democracy measures in Iran as an alternative to policies intended to remove the theocratic government. “The case for war [against the Iranian theocracy] is already being pushed by the ‘pro-war’ elements on the Hill…. We can either remain quiet and let them work their magic OR we can promote the alternative to war by emphasizing the importance of and need for human rights,” reads a March 7 e-mail sent by Nobar Elmi, who joined NIAC in October 2010 as the director of community outreach and programming.
In practice, she wrote, “we’re taking steps to ensure human rights is on the table, by doing things such as working to ensure there is an independent U.N. human rights monitor and encouraging the dialogue.” Elmi’s e-mail was written to Peter Khan Zendran, a Rhode Island blogger who argued that NIAC’s focus on democracy might spur stronger action against the Iranian government.
Other speakers at the event include Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison, the co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus. He is an original sponsor of NIAC-backed “Stand with Iranian People Act,” which would impose modest sanctions on companies that sell domestic-security gear to Iran, but also ease work by U.S.-based non-profits in Iran.
NIAC’s founder and head, Trita Parsi, declined to comment after he was alerted about The Daily Caller’s inquiries by an agency official.
The State Department official, Nossel, will attend the conference “to describe our effort to appoint a special rapporteur on Iran,” said an agency official. If approved, the rapporteur would investigate the condition of human-rights in Iran and send a report back to the U.N., the official said.
To get the rapporteur appointed, the U.S. will have to win a vote on the 47-member Human Rights Council. The council’s members now include China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain, all of which are likely to oppose any such appointment. Libya was previously accepted as a member, but its membership is now suspended.
When asked if Nossel’s attendance at the NIAC event would signal a willingness to cooperate with the Iranian government, the agency official professed ignorance about NIAC. “I’m not at all familiar with the council … [and] I’m not in a position to declare whether this is or is not a front-group for the Iranian government,” he said, adding that a group fronting for Iran’s government would not likely host a meeting that is critical of that government.
The administration is trying to spotlight human-rights questions in Iran, not to suggest acceptance of the government’s policies, he said. “We’re going there to tell [NIAC] how we are looking at Iran’s human-rights record as unacceptable.”
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another clueless mainstream media reporter allows himself to become a tool of Islamic supremacists. "Missouri legislators, wary of Islamic law, propose banning it," by Jason Noble for the Kansas City Star, March 14 (thanks to Block Ness):

JEFFERSON CITY | Missouri Reps. Paul Curtman and Don Wells agree there’s no evidence that state courts are judging cases based on Islamic principles or foreign laws.

But that’s not stopping them from sponsoring legislation to ban the practice.

Bills introduced this year by the Republican lawmakers aim to prevent Missouri courts from applying laws from other countries or those based on Sharia, the Islamic religious law.

Wells maintains his measure is necessary because an oppressive and violent Islamic legal system is spreading across the world and could someday threaten Missouri.

Curtman’s bill, meanwhile, is less concerned with the encroachment of Islamic law, although its language is a near-exact copy of model legislation from a stridently anti-Muslim source.

Critics in the General Assembly, legal circles and the Muslim community call both measures bigoted and meaningless.

“This is an attack on Islam and clearly an Islamophobia bill,” said Jamilah Nasheed, a St. Louis Democrat who is Muslim. “It’s a bill that’s being pushed by ignorant people that know nothing about Islam.”

Unfortunately for Nasheed, we know all too well. Anyone can look at the Sharia states in the world today -- Saudi Arabia and Iran -- and see how oppressive they are. One need only consult manuals of Islamic law, such as the handy Reliance of the Traveller that even American reporters can read, to see that these oppressive features are part of Sharia itself, not some "hijacking" of it.

Similar measures have been considered in a handful of other states, including Oklahoma, where last November, 70 percent of voters approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of Sharia law in state courts. The amendment has since been challenged in federal court as unconstitutional.

Missouri’s debate comes at a time of increasing scrutiny on Muslim Americans nationally and criticism that they’re being unfairly targeted. That discussion peaked last week with a high-profile congressional hearing examining radicalization in the American Muslim community.

The Missouri lawmakers’ bills differ slightly, as does the reasoning behind their introduction.

The constitutional amendment sponsored by Wells, a Cabool Republican, stipulates that Missouri courts “shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures” and specifically bars judicial consideration of Sharia law.

He introduced it last month with 106 co-sponsors — 66 percent of the House membership.

“Right now in the world, there is a big push for international law or Sharia law to be practiced and accepted,” Wells said.

This is problematic because Islamic law is “very oppressive for ladies” and mandates violent punishments for even minor crimes, he said, citing Internet research by himself and his legislative assistant.

Wells acknowledged that no such laws are applied or even considered in Missouri courts today, but he suggested they could creep into American law over a period of generations.

“I think it’s just absolutely a guarantee to my children and grandchildren that in the future they will live under the same laws that I grew up under,” he said.

Muslims and experts on Islam, however, said Wells’ suggestions represent a deep misunderstanding of the religion and the concept of Sharia law.

Sharia is not a specific legal code, but a set of interpretations of Islamic scripture, said John Bowen, a professor and expert on Islam at Washington University in St. Louis.

Bowen doesn't mention, of course, that the schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree on about 75% of these interpretations, and that that area of agreement includes the obligations Muslims have to wage war against unbelievers and subjugate them under the rule of Islamic law, as well as the rules mandating the oppression of women, including the beating of disobedient women, the devaluation of their inheritance rights and the value of their testimony in court, and more.

Majority-Muslim countries have applied those interpretations to varying degrees in their formal laws, he said, and Muslim communities in some Western nations have set up Sharia councils to deal with matters such as marriage or the settling of estates that have a religious component.

Irrelevant. The point of such laws as this proposed one is not to restrict Muslim religious practice, but to restrict the political, supremacist elements of Islam that are incompatible with Constitutional freedoms.

But few, if any, places explicitly rely on the tenets of Islam to decide legal matters, said Bowen, who has traveled extensively studying Islam and is in London researching English Sharia councils.

When individuals do raise religious issues in legal proceedings, courts are generally skittish, he said.

“There are cases where Muslims make reference to Sharia, but what the courts say is, ‘Look, we can’t act on Sharia any more than we can act on biblical law or orthodox Jewish law,’ ” Bowen said.

Jim Hacking, an attorney for the St. Louis chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, was blunter about the courts’ approach to religious law and the aims of lawmakers such as Wells.

“This is a complete and utter waste of time,” Hacking said. “There’s a little thing called the First Amendment that prohibits religion from being used as the basis for law.”

He added: “It’s a political stunt being done to fan the flames of intolerance, nothing more.”

The Kansas City Star doesn't mention, of course, that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements that were tantamount to saying they wanted to see Sharia in the United States.

The other bill under consideration takes a broader approach to the application of foreign laws to Missouri courts and contains no explicit reference to Sharia law.

Exactly what it does, however, depends on whom you ask.

Curtman, a freshman Republican from Pacific who is sponsoring the bill, said it would prevent judges from “ambushing” people by ruling on cases using laws from outside the United States.

“The principle behind it is that our courts should only acknowledge our laws that are representative of our people,” Curtman said. “That’s just a good principle for a democracy in general.”

But the man who actually wrote the language of Curtman’s bill offers a substantially different interpretation of its intent.

Curtman’s bill is nearly identical to model legislation drafted by Arizona-based attorney David Yerushalmi. On Friday, Yerushalmi said his legislation specifies that state courts may not issue rulings based on foreign laws that deny rights granted by the state and under the U.S. Constitution.

Although Yerushalmi’s legislation makes no reference to Sharia, he is an outspoken critic of Islam.

On a network of websites featuring the draft bill that Curtman adopted, Yerushalmi offers a separate “anti-Sharia draft act” that states followers of Sharia pose “an imminent likelihood of violent jihad and acts of terrorism” and should be deported or sentenced to prison for up to 20 years.

Whatever its intent, Curtman’s law may be difficult to apply to the real world if it passes, said Dale Whitman, a professor emeritus and former dean of the University of Missouri School of Law.

A court would have to consider marital laws from another country, for example, if a couple who married elsewhere sought a divorce in a Missouri court.

“It just isn’t a very realistic thing to say” courts cannot consider foreign law, Whitman said.

“Honestly, I can’t figure out any rational reason to adopt such a statute.”

Indeed. Why move to oppose recourse to a legal system that denies the freedom of speech, mandates death for apostates, and discriminates against women and non-Muslims? There is simply no rational reason to oppose such a legal system.

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Left unmentioned until quite late in this report is the sectarian aspect of the story, as Saudi Arabia is eager to keep a lid on its own, grudgingly tolerated, suppressed Shi'ite minority, Bahrain's Sunni rulers try to keep power over a majority Shi'ite population, and an opportunistic Iran is undoubtedly moving in the background to take advantage however it can.

Sunni-Shi'ite Jihad Update. "Foreign troops enter Bahrain as protests continue," from CNN, March 14:

(CNN) -- Foreign troops arrived Monday in the strategically and financially important Persian Gulf kingdom of Bahrain after a month of citizen protests, the Bahraini government said.
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain's giant neighbor to the west, appears to have provided at least some of the troops, who arrived under the banner of the Gulf Cooperation Council.
In a statement, the government described the troops as "coalition forces" but did not say what countries were represented. Their mission was equally vague: "The GCC Peninsula Shield coalition forces arrived in the Kingdom of Bahrain today following recent events, to help protect the safety of citizens, residents and critical infrastructure," it said.
The Saudi state news agency said its government had responded to Bahrain's request for help in view of the importance of security there.
According to the state news agency of the United Arab Emirates, southwest of Bahrain, it too "decided to send a security force to keep the peace in the Kingdom of Bahrain" at that country's request.
Anwar Mohammed Qerqash, the UAE minister for foreign affairs, described the move as part of his country's responsibility within the Gulf Cooperation Council to bring "security and stability to the region."
It was not clear how many foreign security troops had entered Bahrain. Various parts of the Bahraini government referred CNN questions to other government offices on Monday.
A witness said dozens of armored vehicles and buses full of soldiers crossed Monday afternoon from Saudi Arabia into Bahrain afternoon via the causeway linking the two countries.
The Gulf Cooperation Council comprises six Gulf states -- Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar -- and encourages cooperation among members in a number of areas, including the economy and security.
The movement of forces came on the same day that protesters seized control of a key part of the capital city of Manama, a Human Rights Watch official said.
About 100 demonstrators blocked access to the Bahrain Financial Harbour with barricades such as trash cans and cinderblocks, in effect shutting down the commercial district, Faraz Sanei said. [...]
The underlying concern is that Iran, an overwhelmingly Shiite state, could seize the opportunity to meddle in Bahrain's internal affairs. Bahrain has a Shiite majority population, but its rulers are Sunni.
Saudi Arabia's eastern province is home not only to many of the country's rich oil fields but to its largest concentration of minority Shiite as well. In recent weeks, Shiite demonstrators there have protested the Saudi government, whose leaders are overwhelmingly Sunni.
The Saudi government would presumably be concerned that any uprising by Shiite Muslims in Bahrain could inspire the Shiite population in nearby Saudi Arabia to follow suit.
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In defiance of those who intended it to be "Al-Ramla Mosque," and of the local governor who refused to rebuild it where it stood. "Military rebuilding Coptic church destroyed by Muslims," from Asia News, March 14:

Cairo (AsiaNews) – The Egyptian armed forces have begun rebuilding the Saints Minas and George Coptic Church set on fire by Muslims in Soul on 5 March, sources, anonymous for security reasons, told AsiaNews. Reconstruction began today and is being paid by the government.
“The church will be built on the same location and will be as big as the old one, despite opposition by radical Muslims,” the source said.
Copts welcomed the news, but announced that they would continue to demonstrate in front of Egyptian TV to demand equal rights for Christians, a principle still denied by Egypt’s constitution.

AINA reports that a sit-in at that site has ended, following assurances that 11 Copts detained for breaking a curfew would be released, and the prime minister promised "to begin the rebuilding of the Virgin Mary and Bishop Ibram churches in Ezbet al-Nakhl and re-open all churches that were closed for security reasons."

“The rebuilding of the church is a sign of good will on the part of the military,” the source said. “Recently, a delegation from al-Azhar University came to visit Christians in Soul to express their closeness to them.”
The torching of the Coptic church in Soul, a town some 30 kilometres south of Cairo, was followed by clashes between Copts and Muslims that caused the death of 13 people with more than 50 wounded. However last Friday, Copts and Muslims, brandishing their respective religious symbols (cross and crescent), gathered in Cairo’s Tahrir Square to show the interfaith unity of the Egyptian people.
According to the source, a pos