Islamic countries set aside campaign for U.N. resolutions "combating defamation of religion"

I wonder if drawing Muhammad from islamic sources descriptions, is considered "defamatory"?
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/05/drawing-muhammad-dessiner-mahomet.html

" it condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that amounts to incitement to hostility or violence against believers and calls on governments to act to prevent it."

Oops.

Note that the Islamic websites claim that JihadWatch and other anti-Islamic websites promote hatred towards Islam. It is not too much of a stretch to imagine CAIR bringing charges against Jihad Watch on the grounds of promoting "hostility...against believers".

The UN resolution obviously is totally incompatible with the US Bill of Rights. It's one or the other.

The European countries, generally with a weaker constitutional system, have almost totally ceded their sovereignty to the European Union, run by faceless, bureaucratic socialists. It is in the nature of things that the UN bureaucrats will try to bring the US government under its purview. The UN, having evolved from an instrument of world conflict resolution, is now a direct threat to American rights and freedoms.

Secular and Godless organization like UN shouldn't even get close to making decisions in religious matters. Once this madness begun already is time for all freedom loving nations to bail out of that corrupt entity or soon they will not have any freedom. .The Antichrist has been revealed, is not a person but the organization. The UN.

The mere idea of an international blasphemy law, sorry, anti-defemation of religion law should serve as a warning to all internationalists. In a borderless world the central government will look much like the UN today, except for veto power. The large Muslim global minority (globally all are minorities, but of different sizes) that is likely to become the largest global minority, together with its allies in the third world and elsewhere, will set the course of such a global state.

That's what will happen also if the West will continue indefinitely with mass immigration. There are far more Mulsims in the world than Europeans and North Americans combined, and their numbers are growing. With a constant influx of Muslims and a higher birth rate they are bound to become a majority in the West. The debate about the time frame - 30, 50 or a 100 years - is meaningful only to people who don't have children and don't intend to have any. The basic calculation is that the young Muslims will take care of them when they are old and then they'll pass away and leave the country to the Muslims. No harm done. Even if the Muslims were contributing to the welfare system as much as they should for that to happen, what about those Westerners who do have children? Don't they care about the quality of life of their children and grandchildren in the future? Living in a Muslim majority country means there will be a blasphemy law even without the central government of the UN.

And BTW, why aren't the people asked how much of their country's sovereignty they are willing to surrender to the UN? It's nice the OIC gave up on this for now, albeit conditionally, but the potential still exists, and I'm not willing to have the OIC or the UN force a blasphemy law on my country and my people. Is that what the UN exists for?

Freedom of speech is the biggest weapon, as taught by our Lord Jesus Christ, to fight against any evil injustice and slavery, including the slavery of women and children. Thus is why, Islam and its Arabic Pedophile rapist creator, Mohammed hated such precious teaching - and did everything he could, contrary to any Judeo-Christian teachings that include rebelling against the Ten Commandments that founded modern civilized Western laws, and for Mohammed amidst his savage Arabic culture, to be able to continue enslaving women/children (both girls and boys) as sex-slaves. Thus is why Mohammed mass murdered the Jews in the first racial Genocide of the Jews, in order to create supremacist and savage Nazi-like Arabic Empire, hence creating Islam and its blood-thirsty god to justify such savage mass murder (besides raping their women and children and keeping them as sex-slaves)!

OT, for DDA:

There is a wonderful interview of Jerry Pournelle your husband will undoubtedly enjoy (and if he's never heard Pournelle's voice before). Some things I didn't know about him before.

See http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=86&load=5084

I wonder if someone has told the Islamic countries that their Holy Writ is defaming other religions from beginning to end and that a rethink is much needed.

The U.S.-based Human Rights First campaign group said the new resolution was "a huge achievement because...it focuses on the protection of individuals rather than religions" and put the divisive debates on defamation behind.

But surely, current Human Rights legislation already exists that supposedly protect "believers", despite the fact that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is routinely ignored in Muslim majority countries the rules do already exist. What the Muslim states want is legislation that puts their believers above other believers.

The only thing religious in islam is "The Holy Spigot" --OIL!

Otherwise, they exist as idolaters of the big stone-the "worshipful" rock of Mecca and a crazy pagan and his concoction. Everyone, it seems, yields to the concept that a blood cult of hate and hateful, deceitful, lieing can be a religion just because people call it a religion. What weakness. What absurdity! islam embodies almost totally the precepts and principles of the mafia and mostly nazism, combined. A very bad cult, indeed.

islam is a cult, having absolutely no positive loving goodness whatsoever, none that I've ever had honestly pointed out, sans taqya, and embodying virtually all possible negatives, against the principles of a modern civil life.

People must start calling a spade a spade, not a trowel.
islam has far more in common with the ancient practices of pagan tribes of the America's, with all their atrocities, than with any modern actual Religion.

It is sad indeed,that the vast majority of muslims, who are born into islam, the cult of everything that doesn't go their way is to be smashed by god, have absolutely no concept how bad their life is compared to freedom from all their wastes, and pain, and lack of experience of a truly rich existence--called a life!

They have been so brainwashed since birth, their power of imagination of true freedom, with respect of others rights, with the ideas of doing good, of practicing the ten commandments or most of them at least, not doing and dreaming of harm to others, with high mindedness even as a possibility.

The concept of harming others is fundamental to the practice of islam, even to others of professed similar cult beliefs. There exists no concept of live and let live. That is alone, blasphemy, to them. Why can seemingly no one, in the free world, understand that any professed religion, that requires harm to others by a so called god, and equally fake prophet and thief (mo was indeed a thief, too), and requires the killing of those who change their mind (apostates), or simply grow up and see the truth to leave islam and become converts to some alternative belief, even if it is atheism, is simply an evil cult!

It is only because the islams represent a clear and present danger again in the world, due to their resurgence and requirement to conquer the world, and their atrocious and inexcusable behaviors, that the world must get down and dirty with such an absurd lieing, primitive, pagan, people as the people of islam.

There is no blasphemy, islam is as evil as their book commands them to be, that they are. It is what it is. Cause them to wake up to the fact of what they are and always will be until they turn their backs and run away from their fake evil cult, that yet exists as the opposite to the world of decency and decent peoples.

Poor Hillary. First she tried socialist healthcare and got stomped for her trouble. The she tried was bombing an historic ally's capital and that got pretty bloody, but the good part was we got a new Moslem nation out of the effort. But still nobody's happy with her performance. She signed the OIC agreement to make it a crime to criticze religions, even though the only one religion that needs to be openly discussed and openly criticized. None other, just the "faith" of the skull caps.

But Hillary, don't despair. Lookit, just last week we conceded decades of security in the Suez. That's change. And next we're gonna be facing a huge arc of Islamic republics from Persia all the way over to the Maghreb. That's gonna be a real big change. One we'll have no choice but to believe in.

You'll probably get a Nobel Peace Prize for that one.

Yes, what he says this time, and in fact most of the time is right. Still, like Breitbart, we need to lose him. We must be on the offensive, not the defensive. We simply don't have the time to waste fighting rearguard actions.
e. & j.