More protests on King hearings: Muslims feel "unfairly singled out" over jihadist terrorism

Here is a piece from across the pond on the watered-down hearings on Islamic "radicalization" that are nonetheless provoking waves of protests by Muslims in America, who are displaying more outrage and more intensive mobilization over King's hearings than at the continued stream of attempted jihadist attacks on the United States -- oh, sorry, almost all of those were "entrapment," we were told.

Apparently even this much attention to Islam in connection with terrorism is too close for comfort. One might say they "doth protest too much." And so they employ two major tactics: 1.) Deflect attention by appropriating victim status, and 2.) Silence the discussion by acting as though criticism of Islam or Muslims is tantamount to inciting to hate crimes.

But the character of this story is highly consistent with Peter Sissons' account of pro-Islamic bias at the BBC, in addition to being just plain sloppy. For example, there is this remark, casually dropped in without elaboration:

Mr King's language on this subject has often proved inflammatory, our correspondent says, and many believe the witnesses he has called to speak at the hearings do not represent mainstream Muslims.

"Our correspondent says." "Many believe." Honestly, even that paragon of factual rigor, Wikipedia, calls those "weasel words," and would pop in a little superscript "who?" at such drive-by shootings of prose. "US Muslims protest over hearings," from BBC News, March 6:

Several hundred people have gathered in New York's Times Square to protest at this week's Congressional hearings on the US Muslim community.
The hearings will look at the extent of radicalisation within the community and the response on that issue of Muslim leaders.
Muslim organisations say they are being unfairly singled out.
The hearings are in response to such events as the Fort Hood shootings and the Times Square car bomb plot.
'Xenophobic behaviour'
The BBC's Tom Burridge in Washington says the protesters braved the rain to march on the streets of New York, many carrying banners reading "Today I am a Muslim too".
In the hearings, Peter King - a Republican Congressman and chair of the homeland security committee - has called several witnesses to testify about "the extent of radicalisation within the American Muslim community".
Mr King, who represents New York, claims some Muslim leaders are not doing enough to help the police and the FBI investigate terror plots which originate in the US.
Our correspondent says cases such as that of Pakistan-born US citizen Faisal Shahzad, who tried to blow up a car bomb in New York's Times Square last year, and Virginia-born US army Maj Nidal Hasan, who allegedly killed 13 people on a shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009, have changed political language and thinking in the US.

And the first World Trade Center attack, and 9/11, along with attempts in Springfield, Illinois, Dallas, Portland, Baltimore, and Lubbock, Texas (and potentially Dallas again), just to name a few more.

Politicians, the police and people are talking about a relatively new, homegrown threat, he says.
The protesters in New York and others fear the hearings will only increase Islamaphobia [sic] in America.

There's a sentence laden with unsubstantiated assumptions, reported as facts.

Hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons and Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who led the campaign to build an Islamic centre near the destroyed World Trade Center site, addressed the Times Square crowd.
"Our real enemy is not Islam or Muslims," said Imam Rauf. "The enemy is extremism and radicalism and radical ideology."
Muslim Democratic Congressman Andre Carson said he wanted to tell "the Peter Kings of the world, we will not take your xenophobic behaviour".
Mr King's language on this subject has often proved inflammatory, our correspondent says, and many believe the witnesses he has called to speak at the hearings do not represent mainstream Muslims.

You're not talking about The Stig. "Some say" won't cut it.

| 10 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

10 Comments

Excellent insight; this lazy 'style' of BBC's pro-Islam propaganda should not be overlooked, but exposed, as here.

"Several hundred people have gathered in New York's Times Square to protest at this week's Congressional hearings on the US Muslim community."

A friend told me this was a complete bust---anyone know different?

Get a load of the shill Esposito spreading his Islamophobic lies and nonsense in the WashPo re: the King hearings.

http://onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/john_esposito/2011/03/islamophobia_draped_in_the_american_flag.html

Survey says comments are against him 2 to 1 Nice to see so many comments calling him out for the mercenary that he is.

"Muslim organisations say they are being unfairly singled out." Everybody knows how violent those Buddhists are..............

Hmmm--"Selah" the phrase-the Peter Kings of the world. Intended to dinegrate as in- "The Hitlers, or "The Stalins, or "The Charlie Mansons". Paint brush in full swing, eh?

"many carrying banners reading "Today I am a Muslim too".

So tomorrow, those 'many' will be apostates, and their friends of today will be seeking to murder them.

What are the moslems afraid of?

"Our real enemy is not Islam or Muslims," said Imam Rauf. "The enemy is extremism and radicalism and radical ideology."

As I wrote earlier:

"What rot. The battleground is between 7th century "Islamism's Sharia" and our natural, 21st century, freedoms protected by our democratic constitutional laws and government. "Extremistm" is merely an odious sideshow, where the main circus is Sharia law.
I hope the King hearings have some real meat to them. It's time to expose Islamism in America, and all the "Islamophobia" at the media, academia, and bureaucratic levels. No to Sharia. Yes to Liberty!"

The real issues, please, not some 'Islamophic' diatribe from 'fear of Islam' by the press. Let the King speak.

More protests on King hearings: Muslims feel "unfairly singled out" over jihadist terrorism
................................

Yes, because so many besides Muslims are involved with jihadist terrorism! Oh, wait...no they're not...

Marisol said,

"Our correspondent says." "Many believe." Honestly, even that paragon of factual rigor, Wikipedia, calls those "weasel words," and would pop in a little superscript "who?" at such drive-by shootings of prose.

Love the expression "Drive-by shootings of prose" there. Perfectly explains the weasel words in question.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter