Will the jihadist savages celebrate this murder, as they did the Fogel family murders, or will their PR handlers instruct them to tone it down this time so as not to wake up the ever-gullible West?
An update on this story. "Woman Dies of Wounds in Jerusalem Bombing," from Israel National News, March 23 (thanks to Tziona):
A woman who was critically wounded in the bombing in Jerusalem on Wednesday afternoon has died of her injuries, doctors at Hadassah Ein Karem hospital report....
Time for Muslims to hand out candy in Gaza: Woman dies of wounds in Jerusalem jihad bombing
...........................
I just heard this on the news. This poor woman.
Your headline is grim, but apt. Muslims must put in stocks of sweets to celebrate Jihad atrocities the way Infidels buy extra candy for Hallowe'en and Easter. Grotesque.
The Israeli IDF knows what to do. Revenge is sweeter than candy!
The fact is that prophet was a tribal leader who used religion as a platform to conquer the world. His life is a story of a king who fights people, killing and enslaving them, when he is week he prepares and when he becomes strong then attacks and looting, a king who has a long list of wives, young and baby girls are among his wives, old and widows wives, Christian and Jews wives, slaves and concubines. The earlier Muslim commentators are writing about prophet how he was promising his uncle and tribal leaders that if they follow his strategy, certainly; the leadership of the world will be under their feet. If one objection goes against Jews for what they have committed so five fingers raise at prophet regarding what he has done with them.
He beheaded the men and the pubescent boys and enslaved the women and children. In doing this, he wiped an entire tribe “off the map”.
The Jews did not mount any resistance. How could they do this, when Prophet Muhammad recently had withstood such a large coalition of Ahzab and had marched with thousands of jihadists against a small Jews tribe?
The sentence: Death by decapitation for 6000 men and pubescent boys[1], a young smiley face woman was also beheaded as she was busy backbiting about prophet[2].
The executions were probably carried out by prophet and his fellow Emigrants from Mecca; according to ibne-ishaw; the prophet was setting there himself and instructing his fellows, who were bringing Jews in small groups and slaughtering them, the heads and bodies were dragged into trenches in the business district of Medina. Even though everyone agrees to abide by the verdict, the prophet still does not show any mercy, as the men and boys are handcuffed behind their backs and beheaded, and the women and children are enslaved.
Prophet could have exiled the Jews, as he had done to the Jewish tribes of Qaynuqa and Nadir a few years earlier. he could have executed only the leaders, if he believed that they stirred up his enemies.
Today I would not be tearful if he would show the required mercy at this movement, and exiled them and executed only leader or a few trouble-makers. We always teach that Allah is most merciful. After all; we set the prophet as example for the world.
OT
Dog raped behind Mayor's office (Turkey)
There is nothing strange about finding a raped dog in Turkey.
It happens everywhere and you only have to spend some time on Facebook to discover many many cases, sometimes on a daily basis.
But this case is a little different. The end result is the same, a dog is raped by a human and is killed afterwards... what is different is the LOCATION of the crime.
The rape took place right behind the building of the Sincan Municipality in Ankara.
A few meters away from a building constantly surveiled by security a dog is being raped, his screams are loud, can be heard from the distance...
But nobody did anything...
Please call the office of the mayor Mustafa Tuna on:
Mustafa Tuna (DIRECT LINE) : +90 3122693830
email (he checks them himself): mustafatuna@sincan.bel.tr
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=201280266563145&set=a.201280219896483.51006.111324518892054&theater
Why does he not show mercy? The answer is clear that he wanted to reward his fellows, since they collected no spoils from the departed coalition of ahzab, thus Allah gives him permission in Surah 33:27. However, prophet and his group could have had all of the wealth of the Jews after their banishment, but he still did not take this merciful option. But if he had taken it, would he have the wealth by the export of those enslaved women and children?
Prophet gets twenty percent of the Jewish property (movable, immovable and human), and the jihadists get eighty percent, to be distributed according to his will[3]. He took the beautifu girl of the beheaded tribe, Rayhana, for himself instead of taking the path of mercy[4].
http://truthunlimited.blog.com/ignorance/
Hey Khan how about you take your da'awa somewhere else. No one's falling for it here and no one's buying. Your so-called "prophet" (piss be upon him) was a sociopath and incapable of understanding the concept of mercy let alone practicing it.
Jihadist savages? Robert, expect the Britain-based mahoundian Uriah Heep to not-so-umbly throw a hissy fit over this accurate observation.
http://newstime.co.nz/video-dear-mr-taliban.html
Video: Dear Mr Taliban! (Over 18 only!) – Suicide Bombing (Martyrdom) is essential in Islam
The Profit (excuse me, Prophet) as an example for the world? Thanks, but no thanks. Any man who in his fifties has sexual intercourse with a nine-year old girl (Aisha) shouldn't be an example to anyone but perverts. And Allah is not impressive either. Allah is an Orwellian tyrant of a deity and his compassion and mercy are always conditioned upon people being slaves to Him. Again, thanks but no thanks. You see, even if Islam is the true religion (it isn't), it should still be opposed because both Allah and Mohammed are disgusting. Better to go down into the pit nobly for doing the right thing, as did Prometheus, than submit to a cosmic tyranny. Gettin' all this? You can stick Islam where the sun doesn't shine.
Tziona wrote:
Hey Khan how about you take your da'awa somewhere else. No one's falling for it here and no one's buying. Your so-called "prophet" (piss be upon him) was a sociopath and incapable of understanding the concept of mercy let alone practicing it.
...............................
From everything r a khan has so far posted, Tziona, she is *very* critical of the violence of Islam. From her blog postings, she appears to be a Muslim apostate to Christianity—or at least tending in that direction. I think you might want to go over what she has posted, and you might want to check out her blog, as well.
She seems to understand Islam's depredations all too well—and to soundly condemn them. I find her comments welcome.
savage
adj. Not civilized; barbaric.
n. A person regarded as primitive or uncivilized.
*** 33:21 ***
What with modern Moslems and all, we need to extend and refine this definition. It's not enough for the dictionary to use Moslems as the exemplar of savages, they have reinvented the practice to the point that they now control the course of world history.
*** 33:21 ***
One murder at a time, it could be a crime; many murders at a time, it's sublime.
When Mohammed did his mass murder at banu Qurayza, his popularity skyrocketed. As any "Islamic scholar" will tell you, this was not because of all booty and sex slaves that got distributed as a result, but because of The Holy Prophet's moral superiority.
Like what will the IDF do? I'm sure Obama absolutely forbids Israel retaliating in any way as it might upset his fellow Muslims.
Personally, I would not blame Israel for some tit-for-tat retaliation - possibly the only effective deterrent under the crazy circumstances.
I went to the site, r.a. khan, provided a link to, gravenimage, and it does appear that she understands Islam's many limitations, but it's still a strange site. For instance, under #3, Black Americans, she talks about how Zionists are the ones holding some people in Gitmo. Any further thoughts here?
Wellington wrote:
I went to the site, r.a. khan, provided a link to, gravenimage, and it does appear that she understands Islam's many limitations, but it's still a strange site...
...............................
Oh, I very much agree, Wellington. r a khan's statements are at times a bit uneven and unfocused. She appears to be wrestling with Islam and its appalling legacy. She still lives in Pakistan and has Muslim family.
But she is hardly practicing Da'wa here—just the opposite.
For a Muslim—especially a Muslim woman living in the heart of Dar-al-Islam—it cannot be an easy matter to confront the terrible nature of Islam. She must be a brave woman.
Unless she gives us reason to think otherwise, I will welcome her efforts here.
I would go easy on r.a. khan. Her(?) command of English language is deficient, so nuances and tone are all fouled up. The things she sees as wrong in Islam, presented alongside things she still thinks are just plain truth (the result of upbringing and longterm indoctrination) is an interesting, and informative, juxtaposition. Being born into the Ummah causes longterm, perhaps permanent, mental and moral malfunction -- I'm sorry to say I've noticed in some ex-Muslims (not all).
Movie zombies are better behaved and have a higher moral standard...But then, they don't worship Allah and the 'prophet' Mahound...
Re: dogs raped by Turks
A few years ago in here I ran across two lady posters discussing something called "thighing." I asked what it was, they told me, and I googled the term only to discover that it was the act of fondling babies and then discharging sperm onto them. Next thing I knew, I was reading a translation of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's fatwa on the legal dos-and-don'ts of the practice.
Didn't he say there is no fun in Islam? Surely his thighers did this depraved perversion for some kinda fun.
*** 33:21 ***
Now I find out about anal sex of dogs. Here, I have to give the dog-rapers the benefit of the doubt. For surely these Turko-Moslems do this not for pleasure but because Mohammed hated dogs.
Right?
As usual, gravenimage, your position is well argued. I will take into account all that you have said about r.a. khan.
I bet it was one of those Palestinian Christians so oppressed by Muslims in gaza that they too suffered a SJS(sudden jihad syndrome) by-proxy and became a mental Illness case to go out and kill poeple.
Just 5'500'000'000 infidels left until islam get its peace because Muslims never hurt other Muslims ,so the World will be one big iran.
Talking about sweets, last weekend in Victoria was a Rotary conference attended by Waleed Aly(Australia'a answer to Tariq Ramadan) who gave a talk.
The Rotary ladies were so entranced by this con man that they threw sweets at him after his "performance".
I have heard it said, by dhimmis-in-waiting, that he will one day make a wonderful first Muslim prime minister of Australia...
Gravenimage wrote: She seems to understand Islam's depredations all too well—and to soundly condemn them. I find her comments welcome.
OK, OK, I was wrong, I admit it, clearly I should revise my original post, and instead of "Hey Khan how about you take your da'awa somewhere else. No one's falling for it here and no one's buying" obviously I should write "Hey Khan how about you take your da'awa somewhere else. No one's falling for it here and no one's buying, except maybe Graveimage." How's that for ya?
Even taking Khan's "English as a second language" into account it is clear from statements like Today I would not be tearful if he would show the required mercy at this movement, and exiled them and executed only leader or a few trouble-makers. We always teach that Allah is most merciful. After all; we set the prophet as example for the world that Khan doesn't really have a problem with Mohammed slaughtering Jewish civilians per say, Khan's issue is more about perception of Islam than the quality of mercy.
The mere fact that Khan's comments are only tangentially on topic to the article quoted should give you a clue to his/her real motive.
'Turking' has been in the English language for hundreds of years - it means anal penetration. Turks are muslim and, by definition, savages. Dogs, anything - that's ok by them and their so-called religion - islam! And they want to join the EU! No way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
R.A. Khan: Are you clueless, or don't you understand that your soft-pedaled narrative about the "prophet" and his depredations really doesn't help your case any? You may as well have been describing the sacking of Rome by the Huns and Visagoths.
1- English is not my first language and I am making it better
2- The topic is “conflict between Jews and Muslims and some women/a woman has died” now we can discuss the beginning of this conflict when Muhammad beheaded thousands of Jews. The author of website has the authority to remove a discussion if it is out of content.
3- The author of the website knows from where I am working therefore, some time we have to say “prophet” for both purposes, for self safety and to appeal the Muslim minds with respect.
The aim of writing here are
1- To support the author of this website (Jihad watch)
2- To participate the struggle to make this world a home of security
3- To inform about the trapped humanity
4- And to show our work to receive the best suggestions to make our work better.
Anyway thanks for all of you
http://truthunlimited.blog.com/2011/03/08/concubines-of-medina/
1- English is not my first language and I am making it better
2- The topic is “conflict between Jews and Muslims and some women/a woman has died” now we can discuss the beginning of this conflict when Muhammad beheaded thousands of Jews. The author of website has the authority to remove a discussion if it is out of content.
3- The author of the website knows from where I am working therefore, some time we have to say “prophet” for both purposes, for self safety and to appeal the Muslim minds with respect.
The aim of writing here are
1- To support the author of this website (Jihad watch)
2- To participate the struggle to make this world a home of security
3- To inform about the trapped humanity
4- And to show our work to receive the best suggestions to make our work better.
Anyway thanks for all of you
http://truthunlimited.blog.com