Bangladesh: Islamic cleric threatens jihad if child marriage is banned

If any Islamic societies denounce the Mufti Amini as a dangerous crackpot like they did Pastor Jones, or even at the least just call him "controversial" I will drink a gallon of camel piss, as recommended by the Big Mo Himself.

Will we see the least outrage from all the "moderate" Muslim communities here in the more "civilized" West, not to mention our media at the Mufti's threat to launch a 200,000 zombie jihad just because their Allah-given right to diddle 9-year olds is threatened?

What, no flood of tears from Congressman Ellison? Has his emphatic soul dried up?

No protests from feminists all over the world at this insanity?

Deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole..........

Bangladesh: Islamic cleric threatens jihad if child marriage is banned
............................

Think about what this really means, stripped of its "religious" gloss:

"If you try to prevent us from raping children, we will murder you"

More:

He said, two hundred thousand Jihadists of his group are ready to 'sacrifice' lives if any such law, which goes against "Koran and Sunnah" will be passed by the current government in the country.
............................

What he really means is that are willing to sacrifice the lives of the "insufficiently Islamic".

More:

He says it:

Mufti Amini said, "Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, who also married minor Ayesha, when she was just eight years old".

He said, "The new law initiated by the current government will put the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge."
............................

Allah forbid! How could anyone consider calling the moral character of a caravan-raiding, scheming, genocidal rapist, slaver, and warlord into question? sarc/off

More:

It may be mentioned here that, current government in Bangladesh has taken several measures in ensuring better rights to the women thus treating child marriage as severe offense. It also recommends equal distribution of properties amongst male and female inherits.
............................

How "un-Islamic"! But it's good to see that pious Muslims of Bangladesh are getting right on that:

Several weeks back, Islamist clergy Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini and Moulana Rezaul Karim launched a movement of 'combating anti-Islam actions' by the government in Bangladesh.

More:

Mutfti [sic] Fazlul Haque Amini is branded as a 'political tout' in Bangladesh, who is virtually making millions by selling Jihadist notion amongst the people. He is under payroll of various Islamist groups including Pakistani intelligence agency ISI...
............................

Well, I'm sure this is true. However, I imagine the good "Mufti" is acting out of pious Muslim fanaticism as anything else.

More:

They also patronize various activities against these nations, as well as provide support and logistics to anti-Semitic forces in Bangladesh.
............................

"Anti-Semitic forces in Bangladesh"—does it matter that there are virtually no Jews in Bangladesh? Of course not—antisemitism is *always* "Islamic"...

Ban paedophilia! But that's immoral!! :))

One problem is the perfect mans marriage to a prepubescent nine year old girl. Even more binding and serious is the fact that the Qur'an allows pedophilia. Though there is no verse, which gives clear sanction to pedophilia, there are some verses, which clearly allows the practice.

The Quran has stipulated a waiting period for divorced women to get remarried. This waiting period is called Iddah as mentioned in the Quran. But there is an exception; Allah, the God of the Quran, prescribes no Iddah for a category of divorced women:

O ye who believe! If ye wed believing women and divorce them before ye have touched them, then there is no period that ye should reckon. But content them and release them handsomely. (33:49)

From this verses, it is understood that Iddah (stipulated waiting period) is tied to consummation of the marriage. If a woman is divorced by her husband before touching her, i.e. before having sex with her, she need not observe any waiting period to get remarried.
Clearly the reasons for Allah to stipulate Iddah is to avoid chances of pregnancy as a result of sexual relations between the married couple before their divorce.

In cases of divorces, where the husband had sex with the wife, the Quran specifies the Iddah, a waiting period of three months, in verse 65:4:

Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.

Here, Iddah is prescribed to two categories of women. First it says: “Yaisna mina al-maheedhi”—that is, “those women who are desperate of menses”. This indicates women, who reached the stage of menstruation but do not menstruate. The other category are those, who have reached menopause. Desperate of menses points to women, who, though reached the age, fail to menstruate. Their Iddah period is three months. This is prescribed probably to take maximum precaution about her being pregnant. Next, there comes “Wallaee Lam yahidhna”—that is, “those who have not menstruated yet”; this group of women are prepubescent girls, who have not menstruated yet. Here, the Iddah prescribed for them is the same: three months.

Because of those texts in the Qur'an child marriage and pedophilia cannot be eradicated from Islam, because those are the eternal words of Allah which cannot be altered by man.

No body can reform these barbaric, pedophile monsters. They have to follow such criminal activity since it was done by their perfect man, Mo/allah. How dare the government insult the character of that rapist pedophile criminal who is their insan husna or whatever and who did it the six year child Aisha. When Mo/allah is their man to follow, one can see why Muslims have persisted in all criminal behaviors for last 1400 years - they even want to decriminalize it now in modern times. Muslim world is topsy turvy - they can't differentiate between good and evil. What is evil in normal human behavior is "good" in Islam and vice versa. Obviously,they can't live with human beings, they need their own separate planet far far away from this earth!!

Only following the "excellent example" (33:21) Muhammad (51)
who married the six-year-young child Aisha

http://newstime.co.nz/pedo-allah-allows-muslims-to-have-sex-with-pre-pubescent-girls.html
65:4 & Mufa’ Khathat (‘thighing’)

Anticipate a future in Europe, America and Australia when similar threats of violence occur because rational societies try to proscribe the barbarities of Sharia. Then, anticipate liberals and feminists being at the forefront of calls to accommodate.

Ah, one dirty little secret of Islam. If more Westerners new that Islam is the cult of pedophilia, we'd stop welcoming in such pestilence with open arms. Off topic, in Seattle, there is a pro Palestinian, anti Israel billboard. I don't have much info right now but check it out at the Blaze if interested.

Islam is like a spoiled brat who if he doesn't get his way, throws s tantrum.

It's amazing that in the 21st century, we still have people living in the 7th century...

Canonical hadiths say Muhammad (in his fifties) consummated his marriage to Aisha when she was nine (lunar) years old.

A lunar year is about 355 days long, which means that Aisha may actually have been several months short of her ninth birthday.

Some examples from Bukhari, which is the most canonical hadith collection:

Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88:

Narrated 'Ursa:

The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236:

Narrated Hisham's father:

Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Had Aisha reached puberty at age 9? No, she had not, according to core Islamic texts

From Sahih Muslim, a canonical hadith collection:
Book 008, Number 3311:

'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

In the next hadith, we learn that playing with dolls is only permitted for prepubescent children

From Sahih al-Bukhari, a canonical hadith collection:
Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151:

Narrated 'Aisha:

I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

(The parenthetical statement is not mine -- it's in University of Southern California's Sahih al-Bukhari online, as you can see by clicking on the link above.)

And then of course there is the increasingly infamous Qur'an verse 65:4 that specifies a waiting period for prepubescent and post-menopausal females to remarry after being divorced. There is no waiting period if the marriage was not consummated (See Quran 33:49). Thus Qur'an 65:4 assumes consummation with prepubescent girls.

Qur'an Chapter 65, Verse 4:

And (as for) those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, if you have a doubt, their prescribed time shall be three months, and of those too who have not had their courses; and (as for) the pregnant women, their prescribed time is that they lay down their burden; and whoever is careful of (his duty to) Allah He will make easy for him his affair.

Islamic scholars' explanations of Qur'an 65:4 show that the verse assumes divorce and remarriage of prepubescent girls

Here is the explanation of Qur'an 65:4 from Ibn Abbas, who was one of the companions of Muhammad. Ibn Abbas affirms that the Qur'an refers to the waiting period for prepubescent girls to remarry after divorce.

Ibn Abbas on Qur'an 65:4

(And for such of your women as despair of menstruation) because of old age, (if ye doubt) about their waiting period, (their period (of waiting) shall be three months) upon which another man asked: “O Messenger of Allah! What about the waiting period of those who do not have menstruation because they are too young?” (along with those who have it not) because of young age, their waiting period is three months. Another man asked: “what is the waiting period for those women who are pregnant?” (And for those with child) i.e. those who are pregnant, (their period) their waiting period (shall be till they bring forth their burden) their child. (And whosoever keepeth his duty to Allah) and whoever fears Allah regarding what he commands him, (He maketh his course easy for him) He makes his matter easy; and it is also said this means: He will help him to worship Him well.

Some eight hundred years later appeared the Tafsir al-Jalalayn, one of the most widely used interpretations of the Qur'an. Tafsir al-Jalalayn also tells us that Qur'an 65:4 speaks of waiting period for divorce of prepubescent girls:

And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have not yet menstruated, because of their young age, their period shall [also] be three months — both cases apply to other than those whose spouses have died; for these [latter] their period is prescribed in the verse: they shall wait by themselves for four months and ten [days] [Q. 2:234]. And those who are pregnant, their term, the conclusion of their prescribed [waiting] period if divorced or if their spouses be dead, shall be when they deliver. And whoever fears God, He will make matters ease for him, in this world and in the Hereafter.

65:4, according to Wahidi's respected explanation of the Qur'an:

(And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) [65:4]. Said Muqatil: “When the verse (Women who are divorced shall wait, keeping themselves apart…), Kallad ibn al-Nu‘man ibn Qays al-Ansari said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is the waiting period of the woman who does not menstruate and the woman who has not menstruated yet? And what is the waiting period of the pregnant woman?’ And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Ishaq al-Muqri’ informed us> Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hamdun> Makki ibn ‘Abdan> Abu’l-Azhar> Asbat ibn Muhammad> Mutarrif> Abu ‘Uthman ‘Amr ibn Salim who said: “When the waiting period for divorced and widowed women was mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, some women of Medina are saying: there are other women who have not been mentioned!’ He asked him: ‘And who are they?’ He said: ‘Those who are too young [such that they have not started menstruating yet], those who are too old [whose menstruation has stopped] and those who are pregnant’. And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed”.

The bracketed text is not me, it's in the Wahidi at Altafsir.com

Ibn Kathir is perhaps the Muslim world's most respected Quran expositor.

Kathir says of 65:4 (if you click on the link, scroll to the bottom quarter of the page to find the quote)

...There is a third type of divorce, which is neither a Sunnah nor an innovation where one divorces a young wife who has not begun to have menses...

(It's not a Sunnah, that is, not an example set by Muhammad, because Muhammad did not divorce Aisha. But neither is it an innovation -- in this context, something bad -- because it does not depart from what the Quran and Muhammad teach.)

Syed Abul Ala Maududi (died 1979), another famous Qur'an expositor, says of Qur’an 65:4:

Here, one should bear in mind the fact that according to the explanations given in the Quran the question of the waiting period arises in respect of the women with whom marriage may have been consummated, for there is no waiting-period in case divorce is pronounced before the consummation of marriage. (Al-Ahzab: 49). Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for the girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl in marriage at this age but it is also permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Quran has held as permissible.

So major Muslim expositors of the Qur'an agree that Qur'an 65:4 refers to the divorce and remarriage of prepubescent girls. And many Muslim translations of 65:4 make absolutely clear that this is the meaning. (See for example these translations: Al-Muntakahb, Abdel Haleem, Abdul Majid Daryabadi, Aisha Bewley, Ali Quli Qara'i, Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali, Muhammad Taqi Usmani.)

__________________________________________

Also, from Sahih al-Bukhari, the most canonical hadith collection, see this hadith which refers to the waiting period for girls "before puberty"

Volume 7, Book 62, Number 63:

Narrated Sahl bin Sad:

While we were sitting in the company of the Prophet a woman came to him and presented herself (for marriage) to him. The Prophet looked at her, lowering his eyes and raising them, but did not give a reply. One of his companions said, "Marry her to me O Allah's Apostle!" The Prophet asked (him), "Have you got anything?" He said, "I have got nothing." The Prophet said, "Not even an iron ring?" He Sad, "Not even an iron ring, but I will tear my garment into two halves and give her one half and keep the other half." The Prophet; said, "No. Do you know some of the Quran (by heart)?" He said, "Yes." The Prophet said, "Go, I have agreed to marry her to you with what you know of the Qur'an (as her Mahr)." 'And for those who have no courses (i.e. they are still immature). (Qur'an 65.4) And the 'Iddat for the girl before puberty is three months (in the above Verse).

[The last lines are what the man knows of the Koran.]

Iddat is the waiting period before remarriage.

Hey, didn't you know that Aisha was his favorite wife?

Islam has a number of causes of open warfare, and this is not even near the top of the list. (It should be)

Child rape is OK with Muslims. Terry Jones is in gaol.

http://nodhimmitude.blogspot.com/

Something's just not right here.

Infallibility may turn out to be in our favor. Muhams are forced to live as degenerates and psychopaths to maintain Sharia compliance. In doing so they will forever expose themselves and their beliefs as humanitarian diseases to be jailed, deported, isolated, deprogrammed, etc.

Because these pedophilic laws are on the books or even suggested, the U.S. should withhold support to any governments that allows, promotes and/or prosecutes the barbarism and perversity of Muhammadism.

Those who really know Islam should never give up on conveying to others the many facts which discredit it, not the least of which being that Islam's founder was a child molester. Muslims must unrelentingly be made to know that non-Muslims in increasing numbers are coming to the realization that Mohammed was a statutory rapist by any decent legal standard. This would, of course, exclude Sharia standards, indecent, draconian, heinous and stupid as they usually are.

Never give Islam a break. It surely doesn't deserve any. Ever.

Muslims are following the example of the ideal man, The Fondling Father of Islam, Moe Sex-sack. Sexual licence is a huge part of Islam. As a matter of fact, Islam is licence to do almost anything.

I feel so sorry for the girls and young women who have to go through this nightmare.

A slave-of-allah has to sunna (emulate) his "prophet," in all ways, including Murdering of Jews, Christians and non-al-kitabis.

Marisol wrote:

"Surely, Islamic apologists in the West will get right on the line to this guy and explain that, no, Muhammad's youngest wife, Aisha, was 16, 18, didn't know how old she was, was only "nine" in Galapagos tortoise-years, or whatever other excuse they might cook up."

This is what I find soooo interesting. I think we should look at the world globally and also "religion-wise". Because I think there's good reason to believe that Muslims look globally and religion-wise also. And not just nation-wise, like Muslim-defenders subconsciously do.

And so Muslim-defenders defend Muslim citizens in their nation, myopically. Holding forever onto innocence until proven guilty, no matter how much evidence of Muslim-unity and detrimental influence on Muslims from Islam's holy texts is shown.

And always assuming Muslims are very different from each other and much divided. So we hear all the time: "Do not tar all Muslims with the same brush". But then the Muslim-defender go on to assume that the vast majority of Muslims then must be considered totally without problematic anti-democratic attitudes and actions, so the Muslim-defenders "paint broadly with a white brush" and demand trust of all Muslims in their nation. But trust must be earned and deserved, not demanded. And Muslims do not earn and deserve it, what with all this textual and international evidence.

So now it would be most interesting if we could use what this impeccably Islamic mufti is saying against all those Muslims and Muslim-defenders, living in our Democratic nations.

Countless are the times when Muslims on the internet and on TV (like Tarek Fatah last year) argued how malicious Islam-opponents were in insulting the beliefs of Muslims, by insulting their prophet as a pedophile. They berated Islam-opponents and argued that Hadiths were unreliable, that Aisha was much older etc.

But against this Mufti they remain as quiet as a mouse. Being quiet against other Muslims with the same conviction as Islam-opponents about Aisha en Muhammad's age is almost ALL the "Moderate" Muslims can do to prove that they truly differ from those "radical' Muslims with the same opinion about Aisha's age as Islam-opponents.

And there are some who give as lame excuse that those "radicals" misunderstand or misuse Islam, that there are no real Islamic countries and that those radical Muslims ARE NOT Muslims. But no Muslims put other conditions on others using the name Muslim than the 5 pillars of Islam and believing in the Quran as Allah's immutable word. Indeed they forbid Muslims to stop using the name! So how can they call other Muslims NOT Muslims?

Heaven forbid that the Muslims should openly split and that some side with the Democratic world against Theocratic dinosaurs like this Mufti and all who in effect support him and all who practice child-marriage.

The evidence and pressure on so-called Moderate Muslims, those who deny Aisha's young age, is getting thicker and thicker. And I feel as though it is already proven that they are guilty by association. And having forfeited all trust from fellow citizens.

And therefore that they are criminally negligent with some responsible reasonable reaction. I think even the name Muslim is tainted beyond repair and some new name is needed for Muslims to exonerate themselves, a name with proper democratic conditions attached to its use.

And all that I will use whenever anyone in my neighborhood again speaks out against Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Terri Jones and other Islam-opponents.

The average muslim male has to be in favor of child rape, otherwise the weiners will end up in HIS mouth.

Me too Lokar. .seen several expamples here in London I'm sad to say, trapsing 3 steps behind their stern-faced owners and hemmed in by the older wives .Their eyes expressionless, robbed of the innocent wonder of childhood. Totally sickening.

. .the above was my reply to Lokar3791's 7.52pm comment.

More than any of the many disgusting features of Islam, it is the issue of child brides and sanctioned child rape that demonstrates the pathological sickness of this barbarism that masquerades as a religion. We must vigorously resist every attempt to normalize Islam.

"The marriage was consummated when she was nine years of age."

I'd say the Mighty Mohammad had a mighty small one.

Islamic democracy only permits the "will" of the people in line with Sharia enforcement of Islam. The global jihad is now starting to take on all governments for not submitting to Sharia. It shows how far along in global conquest the global jihad leaders (Muslim Brotherhood) believe they are already.

Geert Wilders was right when he said: This man is behaving like a PIG... just like his Prophet!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/06/pigs-of-arabia-les-cochons-de-larabie.html

These bangladeshis are the same bengalis who are raping muslim rohingya women, these Bengalis are just haters and troublemakers, nothing to do with muslims in other countries, since they treat rohingya muslims like crap since they are different.

"Four Bangladeshi youths gang rape Rohingya woman ."

http://www.bnionline.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2171&Itemid=6

"Two Rohingya Girls Gang Raped in Bangladesh"

"Two Rohingya refugee girls were gang raped by Bangladeshi local goons at Teknaf, a border town of Bangladesh, according to our correspondent. Up to date the Bangladesh police has failed to take any action"

http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2004/07/05/two-rohingya-girls-gang-raped-bangladesh

"Rohingya Girl raped in Bangladesh Refugee Camp"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJJr_Q58lYQ

"RRC demonstrates against Rohingya in Bangladesh.flv "

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPgJ3hmGCWY&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

From the article:
...while in Iran, even forceful sexual relations with the married infant is (sic) allowed.

Is there such thing as non-forceful sexual relations with infants?

I think it is time to vote out and put on trial (for treason) the dhimmies in Britain and the USA who patronize these paedophiles.
Then Nuke the Muslim countries off the face of the earth. There is NO room for both Human Beings and Muslims on this beautiful planet.

Imagine!!! A pedophile religion!!! What a country!!!