London's Finsbury Park mosque a "a key transit facility," and "an attack planning and propaganda production base"

This story is best read in tandem with the Telegraph editorial posted here earlier, detailing how Britain and other European countries are funding their own destruction. "WikiLeaks: Guantánamo Bay terrorists radicalised in London to attack Western targets," from the Telegraph, April 26:

Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza, two preachers who lived off state benefits after claiming asylum, are identified by the American authorities as the key recruiters responsible for sending dozens of extremists from throughout the world to Pakistan and Afghanistan via London mosques.
The leaked WikiLeaks documents, written by senior US military commanders at Guantánamo Bay, illustrate how, for two decades, Britain effectively became a crucible of terrorism, with dozens of extremists, home-grown and from abroad, radicalised here.
Finsbury Park mosque, in north London, is described as a “haven” for extremists. United States intelligence officials concluded the mosque served as “an attack planning and propaganda production base”.
The files will raise questions over why the Government and security services failed to take action sooner to tackle the capital’s reputation as a staging post for terrorism, which became so established that the city was termed “Londonistan”.
The documents show that at least 35 detainees at Guantánamo had passed through Britain before being sent to fight against Allied forces in Afghanistan. This is thought to be more than from any other Western nation.
Of those, 18 were originally from abroad. The other 17 were British nationals or citizens granted residency here after claiming asylum, who were indoctrinated before being sent to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.
The Government has paid millions of pounds in compensation and benefits to people regarded as highly dangerous by the US authorities.
Qatada, who was paid compensation under human rights laws for being “unfairly detained”, is described as “the most successful recruiter in Europe” and a “focal point for extremist fundraising [and] recruitment”. Hamza is accused of encouraging “his followers to murder non-Muslims”.
Four mosques in London and an Islamic centre are highlighted as places where young Muslim men were radicalised and turned into potential terrorists. Finsbury Park mosque “served to facilitate and training of recruits,” note the files, adding that it was “a haven for Islamic extremists from Morocco and Algeria.” [...]
Now, the key role that Britain and British-based preachers played in the lives of many of the Guantánamo detainees can be disclosed.
British intelligence services also provided information, including lists of suspected extremists seized from raids on Islamic centres, to the US military as it interrogated detainees. The information was passed on despite the Government publicly condemning the use of torture at Guantánamo. The leaked documents also reveal that:
• Sixteen detainees sent back to Britain are regarded as “high risk” by the US authorities and are liable to plan attacks against the West. However, they have been paid a reported £1 million each in compensation by the Government. For the first time, details of their alleged extremist activities, including travelling to Afghanistan to fight against British troops, are disclosed [...]
The top-secret documents show how Muslim men travelled to European countries such as France, from where they obtained fake EU passports. They then crossed the channel to take advantage of Britain’s generous asylum system.[...]
According to one document, Finsbury Park mosque was “a key transit facility for the movement of North African and other extremists in London to and from al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan”....

Read it all.

| 49 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

49 Comments

The war is comming to us. If we do not encourage more attacks upon our military, our enemies will be able to replace losses and continue to build. The attrition rate of our enemy is just not high enough. We run a much greater risk of the enemy choosing more battlefields and with additional resources available. Playing good defense in war only goes so far.

I read the article and the only question I have (after every one of these articles that talk about “a key transit facility for the movement of North African and other extremists in London to and from al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan”....

is WHY DO WE LET THEM COME BACK?

Why isn't Afghanistan (or Somalia or Bosnia) a place where you can check in but you can't check out? Why is ANYONE who travels without official sanction to these countries allowed to enter ANY country in the West?

This is treason and sedition. These people should be put to death and their fellow travelers, thrown in jail to rot.

This is treason and sedition. These people should be put to death and their fellow travelers, thrown in jail to rot.

This is treason and sedition, according to our laws. These people should be put to death in a military trial and their fellow travelers, thrown in jail to rot.

OT, but 'on target':

The small world of al-Qaeda jihad-terrorism in a bird cage: Mohammed says he beheaded U.S. reporter Daniel Pearl. They're singing like wet canaries at Gitmo?
So much hate in a tea cup... Sick!!!

Close down their mosques.

Only Islam, among the world's major faiths, produces detritus like this. Some accomplishment. Some legacy. If you're a Muslim and you're proud to be a Muslim, there's something wrong with you. At the very least you're very confused and, at worst, simply evil. The burden which is Islam continues to plague the world many times over.

if these people are there on polical assylum why arent they deported?
m

This is nothing new. Andrew Gilligan (Daily Telegraph and others) has been pointing this out for years. The politicians though, including your own Obama prefer to regard Islam as the ROP. ROP????? When not killing the kuffar they are killing one another in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Indonesia, Malayasia, Nigeria, Somalia and all over North Africa and the middle east. The only "peace" that will be achieved is when one faction of Islam imposes it's views on all others including the kuffar. Once there? Well it will all erupt again. There is sadly but one solution which I choose not to mention.

In the UK the extremists are pretty well all on benefits - jizzya.The rest must be avoiding tax if a taxi driver is able to pay £25000- £50000 for his daughter's wedding in Pakistan to a cousin who then qualifies for UK citizenship.

The Government is clamping down on the benefits system. There are indeed many benefit fraudsters and simply work-shy in the indigenous population but I, not a betting man, will probably visit Ladbrokes and place a bet that Muslims will be excused and continue to be paid protection money.

Until our Government find some balls nothing will change. The UK exiting the EU might be a start though.

On May 1st a whole load of Eastern Europeans will be able to come to Britain and claim benefits never having paid anything in to the system. Then again few Muslims have paid anything into the system. Am I p****d off. You bet. I paid in for 40 years and I'm entitled to nothing more than a bus pass.

Sadly Free Thinker, our "wonderful" government quietly disposed of the crime of sedition in the UK in 2009. Whereas it still applies to aliens, I would suspect it is very rarely enforced.
Finsbury park mosque has been "reclaimed" by moderates, but as we all know, moderation has a habit of being a thin veneer to decieve outsiders.
The worst elements of islam are still taught in private sessions in either private rooms in a mosque, or even in private homes, as has been recorded for various investigative tv programs, but all we ever get is "they are not associated with us any longer" or "the filming has been edited to take it out of context"

Nothing new at all - this revelation is years old, and apparent to anyone with half a brain (not the LEFT half, I hasten to add!) in London. And like all "revelations" from the George Soros funded Wikileaks - which they are using as a front to promote butchering freedom of speech/information laws - this is totally worthless at this stage...

"Finsbury Park mosque, in north London, is described as a 'haven' for extremists."

Big surprise ...yet another mosque proving to be nothing more than a haven for "islamic extremists". Gee how many times have we read about mosques being used for "jihad" over the years, jwatcher's? Lots! IMO, all mosques should be scrutinized - every last one of them. They are all potential havens for extremists.

And obama would have a cow if he read my use of the words "islamic extremists" and "jihad" here on JihadWatch - terms he has deemed FORBIDDEN to be used by his staff. Hmm, obama must be a truthophobe - or, perhaps he's a muslim himself. Methinks the latter ...

What's truly frightening here is that those who have promised, taken an oath even, to protect us have known of all these threats - and not just recently, they're known of these dangers for years - and they do NOTHING.

If I paid a guy to cut my grass and he failed to cut my grass, I'd fire him.

Lawns are one thing. My safety and that of my family is something else altogether.

But the really good news in all of this. Even if I could prove of all of this advance knowledge of Muslim dangers and show that all of our "security agencies" did nothing about them, should I decide to sue for dereliction of duty, I would quickly learn that all of the actors involved have GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY from any lawsuit and NO ACCOUNTABILITY, all the while having received great salaries and benefits. "You peons; we don't care about you unprotected private citizens. You're only expected to pay the full freight for all our payroll expenses even though we deliver only nonproductive work."

"Citizens" my eye; more like subjects.

"Subjects: Henceforth, shut up: obey and pay!"

Wikileaks shows US Government probed into Dublin-based Muslim groups

Feared efforts to introduce and advocate for Sharia law in Ireland

One of the latest cables published by Wikileaks shows that the US Government asked the Dublin embassy to evaluate whether a Dublin-based Muslim think tank was trying to have Sharia law recognized in Europe.

The cable detailed how the US Government asked a series of questions on where the Dublin-based groups such as European Council for Fatwa and Research (ECFR), which uses the Clonskeagh mosque, in Dublin, as their headquarters, and the Islamic Cultural Center in Ireland (ICCI), chaired by Imam Hussein Halawa, were connected with trying to introduce Sharia law.

It seems the US Government believed that such groups were trying to get greater recognition of Islamic Sharia law in Western Europe and they feared that such laws would not be compatible with democracy.
http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Wikileaks-shows-US-Government-probed-into-Dublin-based-Muslim-groups-120714439.html

Western governments should stop recognizing islam as a religion and take away all the advantages that come with it. Islam is a political organization and his prime directive is to take over the world. Ennemy of democracy and individual freedom. Warfare is at our doors.

Anybody know what happened to Roland Shirk? I haven't seen his postings lately...

No, though I have no doubt he'll be back with a flourish knowing him.

It's barbaric that Britain/the West is colluding with Muslim fanatics in treating women as baby machines and sex-slaves! The Left disgusst me, an ex-left, by allowing such unacceptable tragedy in the modern 21st. céntury. Those men are basically trained to be savages, treating women and girls as in such primitive and savage way in order to rob the majority Western/Judeo-Christian public through the welfare system. That's all these criminal Muslim fanatics know, aping their creator of Islam, the Arabic Pedophile rapist, robber, slave-owner (including sexual slaves such as young Jewish captive girls), and mass murderer of the Jews, Mohammed!

off topic off topic
PROJECT DHIMMI

AIM: To make Western Civilization Safe for the Most Fearful of Islamophobes.
What is a dhimmi? A dhimmi is anyone who is not opposed to Islam. A dhimmi is an,“exister, whistling in no-man’s-land.” A dhimmi is anyone who aids and abets the spread of Islam in the West. A dhimmi is anyone who loathes Western Civilization. A dhimmi is anyone who does not know about the threat posed by Islam and their active dhimmis. A dhimmi is a leftist/”liberal” who opposes us. A dhimmi is a big parrot with a facial caricature of a prominent dhimmi squawking, “islam is peace” “islam is peace”.

How will we know if PROJECT DHIMMI succeeds? By a sharp rise in the number of islamoloathes and islamophobes leading to grassroots corrective action.

How does PROJECT DHIMMI propose to do this? Through humor and education—a cartoonish book which is a barrel of laughs and a barrel of education. A lot of the humor would be of the sick sarco-type which Islam effortlessly lends itself to. 'There are many ways to skin the rats—the rats being muslims and dhimmis. I have a dream. I want to hear laughter in the stalls from those in the halls of power. I want common sense people to know about the threat of jihad and dhimmitude and laugh at the same time. I want it to be a barrel of laughs where a reader will say, “It’s a real hoot” and “Nope, can’t lend you the book…get your own”. I want the book to be the companion choice of those doing their daily “evacuation”; that should be good for a byte or two of pages. For those in the “speed dump” class, we could expect them to receive at least two-bits of entertainment and education. A cartoon book which is to be digested while sitting on the throne; I resisted the temptation to put in the “h”.

How did this come about? I recently did a search on amazon.com to see whether there were any of the “dummies” books on Islam. Lo and behold, I came across “Islam For Dummies”. Somewhere in that search on that book I came across this, which I assume is an extract:
"Many non-Muslims have no idea that Muslims worship the same God as Christians and Jews, and that Islam preaches compassion, charity, humility, and the brotherhood of man." Of course, that is crap.
A challenge book immediately came to mind, “Islam For Dhimmis”. Was that God inspired? Maybe, or maybe it was the whiskey. One of our JW posters, the talented Mr Sanity, quickly complied with an inspired cover. Please note the BEHEAD and MASSACRE placards and the hatband of Uncle Sam. http://img863.imageshack.us/i/islamfordhimmiesusa2.jpg/ . Please give him a hand by clicking on the ads.

What would a typical page of this 200-300 page book look like? Three parts: the boxed cartoon ; a Qur’an verse or a quote from some muslim luminary or a quote from some prominent dhimmi or dhimmi-in-progress ; and a story in synopsis backing up the cartoon, verse or quote—that’s a piece of cake.

Do you have any examples? Yeah, plenty, because there are a lot of factors affecting the aim of this book and it is OK to repeat as long as it meets the criteria of being funny. A few teaser examples of pages, mostly without the quotes and the stories (to be supplied later):
A muslim walking demo in front of a small and distant White House led by a muslim-garbed man holding a placard “I have a dream” with a thought balloon of a bigger White House with a dome and crescent and two minarets in the foreground. A muslima in a burqa holding a placard “I am an American”, another in a burqa and obviously pregnant with a placard “I am an American Two”, then another in burqa with three kids in tow and pregnant holding a placard “I am Four America”.

The interior of a room with a couple of human heads mounted on the wall. A devoutly “garbed” muslim is standing in front of a bird cage offering the parrot a human finger. He is smiling as the parrot repeats, "islam is peace", "islam is peace". Below the illustration is Qur'an 8:12 on non-believers, heads, toes and fingers, to be cut off. Below that a brief synopsis: Two non-muslim UN employees had their heads cut off on this date in Afghanistan.

Variations on the beheading theme:
Muslims with Ak47s shooting in the air, one bullet’s trajectory about to land on the shooter’s head shouting “USA is dhimmified” , another “job done, allahu akbar”, woman with burqua “Free at last”, a dhimmi parrot flapping his wings and squawking “islam is peace” “islam is peace” with a pyramid of heads in the background. I would like to see the AK47 theme repeated more than once.

Taliban dirt bowling alley with RPG rounds as pins and a talib in the motion of throwing a head with his fingers in the eye sockets and mouth.

A pig farmer in coveralls being held on the chopping block with a muslim poised to cut his head off in a remote part of Arkansas. In one corner a pile of beheaded pigs. In another corner is the jihadee filmer. The cutter shouts, “Allahu Akbar”. The farmer screams, “Al WHO?” The filmer shouts, “Cut, no I mean retake.”

On “sense of life’ between the West and Islam:
Two hot beach volleyball babes asking a couple of burqua-ites if they’d like to PLAY a game. One replies, “No, it would be un-islamic”.

Or a reporter interviewing a burqua-ite who is asked the question “Do you feel free?” She replies, “I enjoy the fullest of freedom in Islam”. Her husband is behind her with a knife at her back (fear and intimidation in Islam).

On their sexual behaviour:
A goat is being ritually slaughtered while another muslim is at the back, smack up against the goat, pants partially down, and trembling, who shouts “Allahu Akbar”. The quote supporting the cartoon comes from the Ayatollah Khomeini in his direction to the omnipervs of Islam.
Any subject, any of the types of Jihads would be open; bald faced lies can be funny.

Can you do this on your own? No. My passion and incompetence would see me dead in short order.

Well then? I envision PROGECT DHIMMI as a collaborative effort using the immense talent of JW posters who want action.
How do you propose to proceed? How do you propose that we proceed?
I have been in contact with RS who said that the idea was interesting but wanted to know “how” and I believe, what resources would PROJECT DHIMMI require from JW. Good questions. My answer: almost none.

In this phase I want to first of all gauge interest. I want to know who would commit to be part of an active and necessary team and who would be willing to contribute some money. If it seems like a go, we proceed to the next phase.
I would immediately need IT types because I would then propose to RS that he run a version of this story which I would ask to be kept at the top of the blog for a period of 3x24=72 hours.with counters embedded in the story. Questions: Do you think this project has merit? Would you contribute funds to this project? Would you otherwise contribute to this project? Would you become a Committee Member? And the ITer would need to ensure that a poster only votes once. http://www.free-counters.co.uk/ The other things that I would ask of JW is for a donation box on the side to PROJECT DHIMMI, that they set up a bank account to receive donations, and a link at the bottom of every story with a link to our website. If we succeed, a substantial portion of the profits would go to JW while holding some back for reprints and maybe a new project.
In brief, and not from a full consideration, we would need:

IT types: administrator who can ensure that all can be done remotely, track contributors, set up of tags for our own website, one of which is for KEEPERS, do conversions to pdf for amazon.com’s LOOK INSIDE! the book, make it ready for Kindle, etc. Estimate costs of running a website for three months and software needed. I am terribly weak in this area. There is free collaboration software available, http://sixrevisions.com/tools/15-free-tools-for-web-based-collaboration/

LEGAL TEAM: Comment on the cover, type of legal entity for the project, tax status, caricatures that resemble real people, avoidance of lawsuits and legal charges.
ARTIST and ILLUSTRATORS and KNOWLEDGEABLES on the texts, and those with a flare for sick sarco-humor
PROJECT DHIMMI COMMITTEE of seven to assess and modify incoming proposals, provide feedback to the submitters, and decide if and when the submission becomes a KEEPER page. Some submissions would be narrative, mine would, and need to be converted into a cartoon.

MARKETING TYPES: Fulfillment by amazon.com which solves storage problems and gets, direct deposit to our account seems the best. Am I right? I dunno.

CARTOON CONTRIBUTORS

What about the back cover? That would have to include the names of the contributors to the project in a topsy turvy, scrambled, like a gang birthday card, fashion: gravenimage, Mr Sanity, Wellington, London Jim, pokermutt, Alarmed Pig Farmer, always on watch, fitna, undaunted, ala sux, Courreges, Jew_Lover, Infidel Pride, and many others.
So what? You would know have you have actively contributed to the defence of Western Civilization.
P.S.
Would another poster on another thread ask me a brief question but start with, “Pokermutt, you wrote:
And then post this post.
Q: Are you entirely sane?
I would reply,
A: No, I am an islamoloathe. And Islam dehumanizes both friend and foe, differing in kind and degree.

. . Roland being the Artful Dodger that he can be. .

Britain - What the hell is wrong with you??

"So what? You would then know that you have actively contributed to the defence of Western Civilization."

"Four mosques in London and an Islamic centre are highlighted as places where young Muslim men were radicalised and turned into potential terrorists."

I'm pretty sure our British friends who post here are pissed off about this. Can they explain why these places have not been closed down?

The Brits and the rest of the EU get & deserve the spineless sellouts they keep voting for, not having the nerve to vote for right wing parties that would actually stop this destructive idiocy because they might be called names if they do. Problem is, their sucker-hearted cowardice hurts the rest of the free world hoping to survive the Islamic menace.

Eastview

you wondered why the "Four mosques in London and an Islamic centre... highlighted as places where young Muslim men were radicalised and turned into potential terrorist" (i.e. where young Muslim men of military age were recruited for combat jihad) have not been closed down.

That was my thought, too, as I read the article.

If the authorities in Britain *know* and have known for years that these mosques and that 'Islamic centre' were functioning in this way...why have not those buildings and organisations been raided, searched, turned inside out and upside down, the imams and all associated responsible persons booted out of Britain on one-way tickets (sans citizenship if they'd managed to acquire it, or else placed under a sentence of permanent exile), and the buildings...dynamited, razed to the ground.

As for all the 'benefits' paid to the likes of Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza...there's a word for that ...JIZYA.

I don't think the inaction of many of our governments is accounted for wholly by the PC mentality. I think it entirely probable that the Abominable House of Saud, and other Muslim entities, have - over the past fifty years and more, maybe from the 1920s onward, and especially once the oil money really started pouring in to make mega-bribes possible - steadily established a mafia-type 'hold' over any number of persons in key positions in the western world (and, too, in places like India, and in the governments of non-Muslim countries in Africa; and it's happening in Latin America, as well). My guess is that all the dirty tricks the mafia uses to buy and/ or control people are being used by the Mohammedan Mob. Bribery, flattery, blackmail, extortion, threats...I'll *bet* it's happening, at every level from local councils right on up to the higher echelons of government and the civil service.

Offtopic.

I notice a lot of people have found themselves making double postings.

I have been noticing, over the past few days, that after I write in the little box and hit the 'submit' button, that the page sits there and sits there and then eventually I get the 'gateway timeout' screen - even though the posting itself goes through.

Is this happening to anyone else?

This is *unusual* - that is, a month ago it would *never* happen; only in the past few days it's happening virtually all the time. Does anyone know whether jihadwatch has been under some kind of cyber attack?

(btw I use Safari on a Mac.)

London's Finsbury Park mosque a "a key transit facility," and "an attack planning and propaganda production base"
..............................

And yet Geert Wilders and Terry Jones are barred from entering the country:

"Controversial US pastor Terry Jones has been barred from entering the UK for the public good, the Home Office says"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12231832

"Dutch MP banned from entering UK"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7882953.stm

How does letting these murderous Jihadists use Britain as a terrorist way station serve the public good while barring two brave men who speak out against the Jihad threat?

Thousands of Muslim extremists carry bona fide UK passports and can easily enter the U.S. They can be in the very midst of extremist territory in Waziristan, take a half day bus ride to Islamabad airport and be in London the next day and U.S. the day after. Madness.

"Islamist extremism: so did we cure the problem?
This week's disclosures from WikiLeaks confirm that Britain was a breeding ground for Islamist terrorism. But, 10 years after 9/11, we still pander to extremism, says Andrew Gilligan."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8475290/Islamist-extremism-so-did-we-cure-the-problem.html

Sadly I am no cartoonist, but I can always contribute manipulated photos. This one, or something similar could be used to explain islam's habit of swallowing cultures and claiming it's previous discoveries as their own.

DDA, I find that hitting CTRL+ F5 after hitting post does the trick

Dumbledore's Army wrote:

I notice a lot of people have found themselves making double postings.

I have been noticing, over the past few days, that after I write in the little box and hit the 'submit' button, that the page sits there and sits there and then eventually I get the 'gateway timeout' screen - even though the posting itself goes through.

Is this happening to anyone else?
..............................

Oh, yes indeed, DDA.

As of yesterday, I was just suggesting that posters copy their comments—just to be safe—and hit the "reload current page" button to see if the comment was already up.

Of course, I've periodically run into time outs before—when posting a particularly long comment, or if I was away from the computer in the middle of composing a post—but this was rare.

Now it seems to be on every posting.

I've noticed a huge increase of double and even multiple postings, as well, even from experienced commentators—and several posters have explicitly mentioned the problem.

And now it seems to be worse. I waited five minutes for a single sentence comment of mine to post. I tried to reload the page, and got a message saying it could not reload (I don't recall the exact wording). So I had to go back to the JW home page, back to the article, then repost—which took another five minutes.

All in all, about 15 minutes to post a single sentence comment. Certainly, that's not something I can do on a regular basis.

I also have carpal tunnel, so I try to avoid extra keystrokes—not something I haven't been able to do lately.

I'm not sure what the problem is—with Jihad Watch or with TypePad—but it is definitely becoming an issue.

Dumbledore's Army wrote:

I notice a lot of people have found themselves making double postings.

I have been noticing, over the past few days, that after I write in the little box and hit the 'submit' button, that the page sits there and sits there and then eventually I get the 'gateway timeout' screen - even though the posting itself goes through.

Is this happening to anyone else?
..............................

Oh, yes indeed, DDA.

As of yesterday, I was just suggesting that posters copy their comments—just to be safe—and hit the "reload current page" button to see if the comment was already up.

Of course, I've periodically run into time outs before—when posting a particularly long comment, or if I was away from the computer in the middle of composing a post—but this was rare.

Now it seems to be on every posting.

I've noticed a huge increase of double and even multiple postings, as well, even from experienced commentators—and several posters have explicitly mentioned the problem.

And now it seems to be worse. I waited five minutes for a single sentence comment of mine to post. I tried to reload the page, and got a message saying it could not reload (I don't recall the exact wording). So I had to go back to the JW home page, back to the article, then repost—which took another five minutes.

All in all, about 15 minutes to post a single sentence comment. Certainly, that's not something I can do on a regular basis.

I also have carpal tunnel, so I try to avoid extra keystrokes—not something I haven't been able to do lately.

I'm not sure what the problem is—with Jihad Watch or with TypePad—but it is definitely becoming an issue.

Hello Mr Sanity:
Did you know that the inventor of the telephone was the muslim Abdullah Haroon el-Bella and not Alexander Graham Bell?

Hello Mr Sanity:
Did you know that the inventor of the telephone was the muslim arab Abdullah Ghasaan el-Bella and not Alexander Graham Bell? Cartoon shows an arab yelling into a British Army Ration can connected by a very, very short string to another can held by a child who is acknowledging he hears speech by shaking his head.

"Sadly, I've been proved right. Britain IS a centre of terror. Tragically, our rulers can't see the truth"


(by Melanie Phillips)


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1380972/Britain-IS-centre-terror-Tragically-rulers-truth.html#ixzz1KiUpe5ti

Dumbledores, in regards to your puzzlement over why these mosques are still open is understandable and a concern shared by many of us. The authorites here are having to 'make the best of a bad job' that began with a major Category Error. I grew up with the Giles cartoon books, which I still love to this day. Giles exactly captures in many frames the transformation of post-WW11 Britain with the importation of foreign labour to keep the factories running. The category error was made back then, in the 60's, in the false assumption that Muslims were adherents to a benign faith. So we find ourselves arriving at today with a half-century-old Gordian Knot. People are wising up at top, but politics is an inexoriably slow process as we all know. I can only hope that they unravel this mess before somebody steps out of the crowd and slices it.

I managed to spend some time in London last year, particularly in Finsbury Park. Needless to say, having known about London's transformation over the past many years, I was already 'aware' of the situation but nothing could prepare me for how saturated this area was with Muslims. I watched where I walked. It is quite bad for those living there as my friend attested. It's absolutely unsurprising that this area's mosque is a haven for terror. The unfortunate thing is that there are many more like these out there in so many different countries across Europe and the United States. More documentaries like 'Undercover Mosque' need to be broadcast and better leaders need to come to power who will actually have the backbone to do something about this, rather than kowtow to a PC dhimmitude mentality.

(or, in this case, whatever word in Arabic was used for the term, since the interviews in this study were conducted in Arabic).
evden eve nakliyat

(or, in this case, whatever word in Arabic was used for the term, since the interviews in this study were conducted in Arabic).
evden eve nakliyat

only crazy countries would try to exclude their own citizens from government positions and their military.

Thailand is very wise in that it respects the rights of thai muslims and hui.

Thai muslims are fully integrated into their country, and serve in multiple positions

As I already mentioned, General Sonthi, former Commander in Chief of the Thai Army is a muslim, as was former interior Minister Aree Wongsearaya.

Aree has since resigned from his position on his own accord- article on minister Aree and General sonthi

http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/12/31/politics/politics_30022963.php

These are not "Muslim" names. "sonthi", and "aree" are not from the quran or from arabic.

Thailand respects muslims rights, which is why most muslims are happy with the King's rule. Only the Malay ethnocentrist racists who believe in Malay supremacy (ketuanan melayu) want to secede.

If you know anything about hizb ut tahrir or anjem choudary, the first thing you would know is that they absolutely hate the house of saud.

this isn't about covering up or a conspiracy, Hizb ut tahrir and al Saud have very different political objectives.

Al saud battled against the ottoman empire, the british gave ibn saud weapons to do so the second time around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Saudi_War

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rawdat_Muhanna_(1906)

hizb ut tahrir glorifies the ottomans as the khalifat, and wants them restored.

Al saud is certainly not funding them. the Saudis fund other salafi/wahhabi hate preachers and various other groups.

the King of Saudi Arabia certainly does not want to be overthrown, lose the monarchy, and get replaced by the Ottoman Empire, which is what HUT wants.

Do you wonder why the Saudis backed Hosni Mubarak, while Hizb uT tahrir protested against Mubarak? The saudis even offered mubarak asylum.

Do you wonder why tunisian leader Ben Ali was given asylum by the Saudis? Ben ali is hated by hizb ut tahrir.

You do not know much about politics.

"Horse" wrote, among reams of other crap:

...hizb ut tahrir glorifies the ottomans as the khalifat, and wants them restored.

Al saud is certainly not funding them. the Saudis fund other salafi/wahhabi hate preachers and various other groups.

the King of Saudi Arabia certainly does not want to be overthrown, lose the monarchy, and get replaced by the Ottoman Empire, which is what HUT wants...
.............................

All of the above is nothing more than jockeying for power between Jihadists. Hizb-ut-Tahrir does indeed want to see the restoration of the Caliphate-although not the Ottoman Empire per se. It is the same with the Muslim Brotherhood, which also seeks the restoration of the Caliphate.

Probably only a handful of Turks actually want to see the restoration of the Ottoman Empire as such.

The Saudi approach is more one of influence and incessant Da'wa. Their goals are not ultimately very different.

Really, each Jihad group imagines itself as leader of that Caliphate. The situation of "rival Caliphates" would be very much like the current savagery of Somalia or post-Soviet Afghanistan writ large, with warlords and their followers murdering each other while trying to establish dominance.

It would be rather like the case of a threatened Jew in Germany in 1934 being asked to parse the comparative aims of the Brown Shirts versus the SS, though both wanted to see him dead.

The Jihad is "not monolithic" in its particulars—except that all Jihadists seek the destruction of the West.

Ikhwan is not aligned with HUT

The muslim brotherhood leader of the syrian group (in exile in england, they are banned in syria), welcomed NATO intervention in libya, as did Al Qaradawi, who slammed Amr Moussa for criticizing the western air strikes.

HUT was screaming over the intervention and did not want westerners to "hijack" the revolution.

The Saudis do not want the Khalifat back. They only want their monarchy, which would be in tremendous danger under a khalifat which proclaims all muslims equal, and under a non hereditary selection system for the Khalifa himself.

The first four caliphs were not hereditary, these are the people whom salafis look to as their example.

Al Saud is a hereditary monarchy.

Don't speak of things you don't know about. The Saudis were practically screaming at the USA to let Mubarak empty his guns into the protestors at Tahrir, and were desperately trying to get him to flee like Ben Ali after he resigned before it was too late.

HUT was celebrating at Mubaraks fall as were the Ikhwan.

the only crap here is you guys speculating wildly on the finances of these terror groups

Ikhwan is not aligned with HUT

The muslim brotherhood leader of the syrian group (in exile in england, they are banned in syria), welcomed NATO intervention in libya, as did Al Qaradawi, who slammed Amr Moussa for criticizing the western air strikes.

HUT was screaming over the intervention and did not want westerners to "hijack" the revolution.

The Saudis do not want the Khalifat back. They only want their monarchy, which would be in tremendous danger under a khalifat which proclaims all muslims equal, and under a non hereditary selection system for the Khalifa himself.

The first four caliphs were not hereditary, these are the people whom salafis look to as their example.

Al Saud is a hereditary monarchy.

Don't speak of things you don't know about. The Saudis were practically screaming at the USA to let Mubarak empty his guns into the protestors at Tahrir, and were desperately trying to get him to flee like Ben Ali after he resigned before it was too late.

HUT was celebrating at Mubaraks fall as were the Ikhwan.

the only crap here is you guys speculating wildly on the finances of these terror groups

HUT drools on all the time on how "Great" the satanic ottoman regime was.

"Horse" wrote:

Ikhwan is not aligned with HUT

Don't speak of things you don't know about.
....................................

I never said that the Muslim Brotherhood was *aligned* with Hizb-ut-Tahrir—merely that both want to see a restoration of the Caliphate in some form.

As a rule, Shari'ah societies that are already regionally powerful—such as Saudi Arabia and Iran—seek to extend their influence through Da'wa, patronage, and funding Jihad terror, often behind the scenes.

They realize that a real push to restore the Caliphate would lead to instability that might undermine their own power, whereas Jihad terror groups with no established power feel they have nothing to lose and do want to see a new Caliphate.

In the end, though, it's all about Muslim supremacy, imposition of Islamic law, and jockeying for power. All the rest is just details.

Workers have begun dismantling a giant sculpture meant to promote reconciliation
prefabrik

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter