Iraq’s Kristallnacht: 70 Years Later

Iraq’s Kristallnacht: 70 Years Later
By Robert S. Wistrich

Seventy years ago, on June 1, 1941, the most dramatic and violent pogrom in the Arab Middle East during World War II took place in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad. Known in Arabic as the Farhūd, this devastating pogrom left approximately 150 Jews dead, hundreds more wounded, and led to the ransacking of nearly 600 Jewish businesses. The grim events of June 1-2, 1941 were the Iraqi Arab equivalent of the mass violence on Kristallnacht, which had taken place some two and a half years earlier across Nazi Germany. The anti-Jewish riots were mainly led by Iraqi soldiers (bitter and frustrated by their defeat at the hands of the British Army), some members of the police and young paramilitary gangs, swiftly followed by an angry Muslim population that went on the rampage in an orgy of murder and rapine.

The pogrom struck at what was the most prosperous, prominent and well-integrated Jewish community in the Middle East – one whose origins went back more than 2,500 years – long before there was any Arab presence in the country. The 90,000 Jews of Baghdad, it should be said, played a major role in the commercial and professional life of the city. However, in the 1930s they already found themselves confronted by an increasingly virulent anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist propaganda in the Iraqi press and among nationalist political groups. This agitation treated the intensely patriotic Iraqi Jews as an alien, hostile minority who had to be ejected from all the social, economic and political positions it held in the Iraqi state.

Iraqi Arab nationalists, like their counterparts in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Egypt, had been much influenced in the 1930s by the rise of Nazi Germany. Hitler’s National Socialism attracted them as a spectacular, authoritarian model for achieving Iraqi national unity and a wider union of Arabs in the region. It was no accident that the pro-German ideologue of pan-Arabism, Sati al-Husri, exerted a major influence on Iraqi education after arriving in Baghdad in 1921, or that Michel Aflaq, the chief theoretician of the Iraqi and Syrian Ba’athists had also absorbed German national-socialist ideas while studying in Paris between 1928-1932. The Director General of the Iraqi Ministry of Education in the 1930s, Dr. Sami Shawkat, was another fanatical ideologue, especially active in instilling a military spirit (resembling the German Nazi model) in Iraqi youth. He also developed radically anti-Jewish ideas which were heavily indebted to Nazi anti-Semitism. In a book published in Baghdad in 1939, These Are Our Aims, Shawkat openly called for the annihilation of the Jews in Iraq, as a necessary prerequisite for achieving an Iraqi national revival and fulfilling the country’s ”historical mission” of uniting the Arab nation.

Significantly, it was also in Baghdad that the first official Arabic translations of parts of Hitler’s Mein Kampf appeared in 1934. In order not to offend Arab sensibilities the final translation “edited” out Hitler’s racial theories about inferior “Semites” – making it clear that anti-Semitism related only to Jews, not to Arabs. The Iraqi translator of Hitler’s “magnum opus” was Yūnus al-Sab’āwī, a young Nazi enthusiast and extreme anti-Semite. A close confidant of nationalist officers in the Iraqi army, Al-Sab’āwī came to play an important role in Iraqi politics. From April to June 1941 he even served as Iraqi Minister of Economics. Al-Sab’āwī was indeed one of the architects of the Farhūd in which his anti-Semitic para-military youth group also took part. Al-Sab’āwī had earlier established a close connection with Nazi Germany’s Ambassador to Iraq in the late 1930s, Dr. Fritz Grobba. The latter was a distinguished Orientalist (fluent in Arabic, Persian and Turkish) who eventually convinced Hitler that helping Arab nationalists to throw off British control of Iraq should be part of German strategy. Grobba also contributed much through the networks he had established in Iraq, towards spreading the idea that Iraqi Jews were a “fifth column” of Great Britain – sworn enemies of Germany and of the Arab nation. Equally, Palestinian nationalists, led by the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini (who had had fled to Baghdad in the late 1930s), conducted an especially vicious campaign to incite a jihad among the local Arab population against Great Britain, Zionism and the Jews of Iraq. The Mufti – a close ally of Hitler during the four years he spent in Berlin between 1941 and 1945 – would also exert a particularly toxic influence on the pro-Nazi politician Rashid Ali al-Kailani, whose successful anti-British coup had forced the unpopular Hashemite Regent Abd al-Ilāh to flee the country. The coup brought to power on April 1, 1941 some of the most rabid Jew-baiters in Iraq. Anti-British and anti-Semitic propaganda now reached a zenith that greatly contributed to the violence that burst forth two months later.

Ironically enough, it was the decisive victory of the British and the return of the Regent on June 1 that immediately provoked the pogrom, an act of unparalleled revenge by the Muslim masses against the Jews of Baghdad that expressed their deep disappointment at the fall of the popular Rashid Ali regime. The British Army, now encamped on the outskirts of Baghdad, could easily have intervened but it chose not to do so, dubiously claiming this would have damaged the prestige of the (pro-British) Regent in the eyes of his own people. The British behaved in a similar fashion on several occasions in Mandatory Palestine, in Libya (November 1945) and in Aden (December 1945) – standing by as Arab mobs killed defenseless Jews. In fact, for most Iraqi Muslims in 1941, the British were perceived as oppressive colonizers, the Jews as their “agents” and the German Nazis as “anti-imperialist” saviors! But German military assistance, when it finally came, was too little and too late to save the Rashid Ali regime.

The Farhūd has been incomprehensibly ignored or downplayed both in Zionist historiography and even more in general histories of the Middle East. Arab historians have been silent or else falsified the facts and there are even Israeli and Jewish writers who have unconvincingly tried to dismiss its importance. Yet this traumatic event was indeed of seminal importance. It proved beyond reasonable doubt the strength of Arab nationalist anti-Semitism and of Nazi-style incitement on a Muslim population that had come to see in its patriotic Jewish minority “the enemy within.” The Jews of Iraq, seventy years ago, suddenly found themselves in the crossfire of three converging forms of murderous anti-Semitism – that of the German Nazis, the Palestinian exiles in Baghdad led by Amin el-Husseini, and Iraqi pan-Arab nationalists. Ten years later, the government of Iraq under the pro-British Nuri es-Said, expropriated, dispossessed, disenfranchised and brought about the forced emigration of nearly 120,000 Iraqi Jews, thereby cruelly terminating the oldest of all Diaspora histories. This was not only a crime against humanity but an insufficiently acknowledged part of the history of the Holocaust. The Farhūd exposed with shocking clarity just how vulnerable the Jews in Arab lands really were and what their fate was likely to be under any decolonized Arab regime in the future, especially if there was a breakdown of law and order.

Despite the “Arab Spring” not much has changed for other minorities in the Middle East in the last 70 years. As for the Jews, from Morocco to Iraq and Iran they would be “ethnically cleansed” after 1945 by their Muslim rulers. The Farhūd already represented the writing on the wall for those willing to read it. The reinforcement of a strong Israel was and still remains the only viable long-term answer to the repetition of such horrific atrocities in the future.

Prof. Robert S. Wistrich is the director of The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/) and the author of A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad (Random House, January 2010). This article is a condensed version of a recent lecture on the 1941 pogrom in Baghdad hosted by the Center in Jerusalem.

| 24 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

24 Comments

| Leave a comment

We are also coming up on the 80th anniversary for Japan's starting of WW2. In September of 1931 it was japan the used agents to bomb a shared railway line in Manchura and made sure the Japanese Troops were on the Train to be killed and thus justify a raid and slaughtering of Chinese troops based there as well.
The useful idiots on the Left are hell bent on eating up the tripe in the Schools that the USA was the big bully that forced japan to attack Pearl Harbour in 1941.
One yahoo actually has a book to claim that FDR was behind pearl Harbour and used American Planes modified to look like jap Zero's, but the Conspiracy fall apart when you ask how the hell did FDR get over 400 American Pilots, close to 500 Jap zero's and all those Aircraft Carriers at Sea to launch them from while not one person went Public to expose this Inside-Job by FDR.

Another Bozo has a book that infers that Airplanes did NOT hit the WTC towers and that it was a Secret Military energy weapon that vapourized the Towers to create all that dust and powder we saw.

The good news is that the Islamist thugs will kill off the morons and fools in the West that fell for the Taqqiyah garbage that Muhammed was a man of peace and Islam is the true faith for all people( Except Gays,females,disabled,elderly,children,non-arab Africans,jews,christains,and about 90% of all people on Earth today) and must be embraced or face death.

Iraq’s Kristallnacht: 70 Years Later
.........................

Thanks for this article, Mr. Wistrich. While the terrible events of the Holocaust are generally quite well know, this is an incident which few have heard of.

More:

The anti-Jewish riots were mainly led by Iraqi soldiers (bitter and frustrated by their defeat at the hands of the British Army), some members of the police and young paramilitary gangs, swiftly followed by an angry Muslim population that went on the rampage in an orgy of murder and rapine.
.........................

Even though there had been a large Jewish presence in Iraq for *millenia*, they are here associated with the British and the West.

The situation is strikingly similar for many Christians in Dar-al-Islam today—where they are associated with the West, even though their communities in what is now the Muslim world frequently pre-date Islam.

More:

Iraqi Arab nationalists, like their counterparts in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Egypt, had been much influenced in the 1930s by the rise of Nazi Germany. Hitler’s National Socialism attracted them as a spectacular, authoritarian model for achieving Iraqi national unity and a wider union of Arabs in the region.
.........................

And this admiration was mutual. Much of the model for the Holocaust was taken from the Muslim genocide of the Armenians in Turkey.

More:

Significantly, it was also in Baghdad that the first official Arabic translations of parts of Hitler’s Mein Kampf appeared in 1934.
.........................

Notably, Mein Kampf is *still* a big seller in the Muslim world—in fact, this is the only region where this is true.

The Farhūd would also set the model for the expulsion of Jews from virtually all the countries of the Muslim Middle East in 1948 on the creation of Israel. While somewhat less bloody than the Farhüd itself, it led to the illegal expulsion of up to 900,000 Jews from their countries of birth—as well as, in most cases the outright theft of all their property and goods.

Most Sephardic Jews arrived in Israel traumatized and penniless. Like the Farhüd, this hugely significant piece of history is also not widely known.

There need to be extremely brave stance by the Jewish people to re-open investigation into the root of Hitler/German Nazi's antisemitism as influenced by Islam and the Arabic-Turkish Muslims, who may not be just Hitler/Nazis' collaborators but were actually ADVISERS. I went to the Jewish Museum in Berlin and was disappointed that the root of antisemitism was applied to Christianity and Christians. There was no mention of the real root of antisemitism as originated under Islam which is created by the Arabic Pedophile rapist, robber, slave-owner (including sexual slaves such as young Jewish captive girls), and mass murderer of the Jews, Mohammed, in order to gain absolute and maniacal political power through the creation of pure Arabian kingdom and legitimize his and his tribe’s evil Arabic socio-cultural practises, especially against Judeo-Christian shared God and civilized tradition. Nor was there any mention of further Genocide of the Jews in Medieval Christendom by Mohammed's Muslim army, where until then, there was no systematic mass murderous conflicts between Christians and Jews in ancient Europe.

Nothing personal to any Israelis here, but the sort of thing which Wistrich wrote is why I think the Israeli's are danged stupid when it comes to PR.

I know something about the history of the Mizrahi Jewish communities myself, and have always wondered where the world's outrage at their plight is. Maybe Israel should have kept them locked up in "refugee camps" instead of making them no-questions-asked Israelis, and there'd be less self-righteous indignation over the plight of Falastin Arab "refugees" who should have been absorbed into the Arab states long ago.

AND, given that four-fifths of my Christian Bible happens to be the Jewish Bible, I'm enraged that apart from a few Assyrians and Chaldeans who claim descent from Bible-era Jews, Iraq has been cleansed of the community that gave us the Book of Daniel, Psalm 137, portions of Ezra and Nehemiah, etc.

Thanks Kepha, I've been arguing this for years, 'until I'm blue in the face' as they say. Unfortunately the Israeli oligarchs are primarily Jews of European heritage (Ashkenazim), and modern Israeli culture is heavily bias in favour of the European mindset. As a misrahi Jew myself, and someone who has spent most of my adult life in "the arts" and related subcultures, I have long argued Israel needs to bring to the foreground our history in Arab lands and promote our "Jews of Color" (Ethiopians, Yemenites, Moroccans, Indians, etc.) if only to counter the popular fallacy that all Israelis are European colonists 'occupying' lands belonging to "indigenous" Arabs.

Now that you've got an African-American President in the US, perhaps the Israeli media and the oligarchs will see the benefit of having non-blond talking heads and start bigging-up Middle Eastern Jewish history. As the radical saxophonist John Zorn says "it's time for Jews to stop trying to pass for white." He's not talking about skin color, he means it's time for Jews to cast off their European pretensions.

To add to Katharina's comment:

Nazi ideology is often laid at the doorstep of Christendom - and with SOME justification. However (comma), much of it was also from Darwinism, and Eugenics movement: race based theory that dovetailed nicely with Nazi anti-semitism.

So, while SOME Christians, were under the, mistaken, belief that "the Jews killed Jesus", the churches in Nazi Germany were state controlled in what they could preach and what they could advocate.

On a purely personal belief: This is not unlike today with Political Correctness' infection of "thought crimes" wherein a Clergy member may not condemn Islam, nor homosexuality, nor [PC endorsed belief].

That said, it is within CHRISTIAN nations that while homosexuality is condemned based on scripture, we don't go around openly stoning gays, and even have laws to protect them from violence (as we should).

The basic precept is that Islam was the "final prophet" and the "final word of God" - and it was reinforced that they were "the chosen people" by their hold on much of the Holy Land for over a thousand years (on and off, but basically).

Then the Israelites came back - they were re-established in the Holy Land, got the holy city of Jerusalem, and, despite repeated invasions, could not be beaten.

The old rivalry of "who is first born" between Isaac and Ishmael, which Mohammed had re-written the history for, and, according to Islam, had settled, was resurrected.

Because, despite all the occurances of the past 1400 years, of the Jews being kicked about, and the Arabs having hold of the Holy Land, suddenly, the Sons & Daughters of Ishmael were displaced by the Sons & Daughters of Isaac, and that contradicted Islamic teachings.

It amazes me, that in all these discussions, that seed of Muslim hatred for the Jews (daddy liked ME more ... ugh) is often not brought into the discussion.

I believe it to be relevant. What say you all?

Steven

The ironic side of the Jewish history is fraught with events in which non-Jews risked their lives to help Jews, whereas the Jews often hurt their own people. Such ironies have been most obvious among American Jewry--with Soros tops the list.....

I haven't read his book, so I don't know how much time or attention Wistrich gives to what one might call home-grown Muslim Jew-hatred: the sacralised Jew-hatred that is explicitly taught by the Sira, the Qur'an, the Hadith, the canonical texts of Islam and then was elaborated, ad nauseam, in their most authoritative interpretations, and found expression repeatedly in mass murder, long, long before Hitler was ever born, and in societies where 'Christendom' had no presence or influence whatsoever. Muslims needed *no* foreign ideas, and *no* foreign encouragement, to repeatedly rob, rape, mass-murder (and on occasion, as in Yemen repeatedly, in Persia also, and in far-off Afghanistan) force-'convert' their dhimmi Jewish populations.

Perhaps the most obvious example of this is the rabid Jew-hating Mohammedan 'theologian' Al-Maghili, of 15th century Morocco (where there were no Christians at all), who incited a Muslim pogrom against the Jews of the Touat Oasis. Al-Maghili produced highly inflammatory poems and 'sermons'. One of his slogans was this: "Love of the Prophet [Mohammed] requires hatred of Jews".

And then there is the famous letter of Moses ben Maimon to the Jews of Yemen, c.1200 AD: they were facing a particularly severe onslaught of Muslim persecution.

Moses ben Maimon wrote to them as follows:

“Remember, my coreligionists, that on account of the vast number of our sins, {note - I beg to differ with Maimonides' reading of causes: far too often, dhimmis blame themselves for the horrors that Muslims inflict on them. To view the horror of jihad and dhimmitude as a deserved, divinely-inflicted punishment, merely plays into the hands of the Muslim persecutors and murderers - dda}

God has hurled us in the midst of this people, the Arabs, {that is, the Arab Muslims...dda} who have persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory legislation against us. . .

"**Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase, and hate us as much as they. . . .** {nota bene: remember, this is Maimonides speaking, a man well aware of history, and who had lived in both Muslim and Christian lands, and had had contact with both Muslims and Christians - dda}

'Although we were dishonored by them beyond human endurance, and had to put up with their fabrications, yet we behave like him who is depicted by the inspired writer: “But I am as a deaf man, I hear not, and I am as a dumb man that openeth not his mouth (Psalm 38: 14).
'Similarly our sages instructed/ us to bear the prevarications and preposterousness of Ishmael in silence…. {in other words, they were good, submissive dhimmis - dda}

'We have acquiesced, both old and young, to inure ourselves to humiliation, as Isaiah instructed us, “I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair” [Isaiah 50: 6].

'All this notwithstanding, we do not escape this continual maltreatment which well nigh crushes us.

'No matter how we suffer and elect to remain at peace with them, they stir up strife and sedition, as David predicted: “I am at peace, but when I speak, they are for war” [Psalm 120: 7]."

{In other words: no matter how deeply the dhimmi submits to his Muslim masters, no matter how much he begs, pleads, flatters, appeases, his submission and humiliation are never abject enough to satisfy the sadistic Muslim lust for dominating over, hurting and humiliating him - dda}

- Moses ben Maimon (Maimonides), Iggeret Taiman (Epistle to Yemen), edited by A S Halkin; translated by B. Cohen, New York, 1952 [p. 18].

One should note too that one of Goebbels' pets, the Nazi Orientalist Johann von Leers, admired Islam very much, precisely because he admired the extent to which Islam had succeeded in crushing and keeping down the dhimmi Jewish communities. Indeed, he admired Islam so much, precisely because of its vicious oppression and suppression of the Jews, that on escaping Europe after the defeat of the Nazis he scuttled off to dar al Islam and recited the Shahada, all the better to go on hating Jews and trying to kill them.

From Wistrich's article.

The pogrom struck at what was the most prosperous, prominent and well-integrated Jewish community in the Middle East – one whose origins went back more than 2,500 years – long before there was any Arab presence in the country.

That's how islam maintains it parasitic existence.

Expropriation.

Tziona, you may not have noticed, but the skin colors of Mizrahi Jews range between white and brown, like many other Middle Eastern populations (a few examples: Shiri Maimon, Ninnete Tayeb, Harel Skaat, Korin Alal [who is also blue-eyed], but I could give you a million more examples. And it's not a result of recent European colonialism. Ramesses II, for instance, was a redhead). The majority of Ashkenazim (genetically Middle Eastern mixed with Europeans) have white skin color, but some are dark (a few examples: Idan Raichel, Nir Davidovich, Gal Freidman, Yardena Arazi). That's what happens when a group of people whose skin colors range between white and brown marries with whites - most their descendants will have light skin, but some will be dark.

Of course, the history of the Mizrahim should be talled loud and clear, but please don't make it about skin color. I don't regard myself "racially white" regardless of my skin color, and on the Ashkenazi part of my family there many dark people, including my brother. And the many white-skinned Mizrahi Jews aren't "racially white" either. Don't know what's "racially white", but it has something to do with being native Euro.

I wouldn't like us to play into the Western Leftist obssession with race. The Mizrahi story should be told not because of skin color or because you are 100% Middle Eastern while I am anywhere between 50% and 90% Middle Eastern. It should be told to refute the fairytale that Jews were treated wonderfully under Arab and Muslim rule.

"Nothing personal to any Israelis here, but the sort of thing which Wistrich wrote is why I think the Israeli's are danged stupid when it comes to PR."

No Israeli will take offence. All Israelis know Israel sucks big time in PR.

Oh, and Tziona, regarding the John Zorn comment, I completely agree. The Jews were never considered whites (in the "racially white" sense) until after the Holocaust. Because the Nazis considered the Jews an inferior "race" one of the lines of defense by both some Jews and non-Jewish liberals was that the Jews are white. I disagree with this line of defense. There's nothing wrong with having non-white ancestry, the wrong thing is to kill people for having non-white ancestry.

Culturally, I won't describe Israel as European, but as a synthesis of West and East and some other, less prominent, ingredients. In terms of basic values and political system it's Western, though I dare say some of the Western basic values are Eastern, or more specifically of Judaic origin. Its official languages (Hebrew and Arabic) are Semitic. The music draws mainly from Western and Middle Eastern styles with some Spanish, Latin American, Ethiopian and other influences. Likewise the food.

There's no shortage of pogroms in Muslim history, is there? Just like there's no shortage of pogroms in the Muslim present.

I'll tell you something ridiculous which I've run into from your quarter of the world,

I know two guys, one of whom comes from a family settled in 'Eretz Yisrael back in the 1500's, the other of whom comes from stock dumped there in the 1870's. But because the swarthy former one is a Ladino-speaking Jew who identifies with the Israeli state and the latter is a pale Bosniak-descended Muslim who identifies himself as "Palestinian", the former is the evil "white" colonialist and the latter the "colonized" victim "of color".

So, why aren't the Turks blamed for resettling all these odd populations of Sephardim, Maghrebis, Circassians, Balkan, and Cretan people in 'Eretz Yisrael? Probably because the professional agonized consciences of the Western world have the historical sense of earthworms.

For the record, I am usually seen as a "white" American Christian. In fact, I myself think that our "racial" classifications are nonsense, and I've run into Middle Easterners who were fairer than some indigenous Britons and Scandinavians I've known.

Frankly, I'm of the mind that the worse the cause, the better the PR. I don't no why, but it always seems that way.

Dear Doom-&-Gloom in response to your 1st post I say: You may not have noticed but I never said Mizrahim were all dark-skinned. I said that Israel needs to exploit it's "Jews of Color" [tongue in cheek] to counter the common myth (as seen in the Palestinian video posted here at JihadWatch on Monday) that Israelis are invading aliens from Europe. The longer Israel's talking heads are seen to be "white," the longer this myth will be perpetuated. I don't like race politice and I don't like playing the race card, but this is war and all the tools in our tool-box but be considered useable if we are to win it.

In response to your 2nd post I say: Israel is becoming a synthesis of East and West, but it's taken a hard slog by the non-Ashkeazi community against stubborn resistance to get to where we are now. But even though non-Ashkenazim have now made their mark in pop culture, the military and commerce, the political and legal sphere's remain firmly in the grip of the Ashkenazi elites. Things are changing, and will continue to change, but it's time that the entrenched Ashkenazi elites realised that publicizing misrahi history and showing a few darker Jewish faces to the world would enhance the Israeli cause. We might not like playing race politics, but unfortunately it is a fact of life, indeed race-politics (a.k.a. xenophobia) is as old as man, and stretches back to the dawn of humanity.

Many of our Foreign Affairs Ministers were Mizrahi (David Levy, Shlomo Ben Ami, Silvan Shalom...) and also many of our representatives in the Eurovision Song Contest, including all of the ones who won and the ones who became famous through it, so Mizrahi Jews are in positions where they are seen by the world, but in spite of seeing them, people still prefer to regard us "Europeans". Why? Because it serves their cause. And as for the army, what about people such as Avigdor Kahalani and Shaul Mofaz that was also our Defence Minister? They are dark Mizrahim, so they can't be confused with Europeans, but did that help against the "European invaders" calumny? As long as being of non-European descent will be used as the excuse to expell or kill us, all of us will be regarded non-Europeans, but if being of European descent becomes the excuse to expell or kill us, then all of us will be regarded as European.

As for the skin color thing, as long as these Mizrahim have light skin it will not serve, so you're saying we must elect people based solely on skin color. So if Shaul Mofaz wins the Kadima primaries we need to vote for Kadima even if we don't support it, solely because Mofaz is dark. Or maybe I should have voted Labor when Amir Peretz was leading it just because Peretz is somewhat darker than white.

Mahmood Abbas has white skin, Suha Arafat has white skin, the "Palestinian" queen of Jordan looks European, Bashar Asad is blue-eyed white. Yet they're considered "people of color" and Shaul Mofaz is a native Euro.

Continuing with some famous Israelis that should have had the effect of dispelling the myth, but don't:

- Ofra Haza was a dark Mizrahi who had Yemeni style songs.

- Dana International can't be confused with a European either.

- Idan Raichel is Ashkenazi, but looks like an Arab, and has Ethiopian singers in his band.

- David D'Or is a fair skin Mizrahi, but his music is very versatile, including Mizrahi music.

- Orphaned Land does a lot of Oriental metal. Its frontman is Mizrahi, though "unfortunately" looks like a Euro.

- Many of our Olympic medalists (the few we have), whether Mizrahi or Ashkenazi, have pretty dark skin.

- Many of our soccer players who play abroad, such as Yossi Benayun and Dudu Awat are pretty dark Mizrahim.

But what can we do if Ishtar, Avi Cohen (born in Egypt), Shiri Maimon and many other Mizrahim with some fame abroad look European?

Doom-and-Gloom wrote: Mizrahi Jews are in positions where they are seen by the world, but in spite of seeing them, people still prefer to regard us "Europeans". Why? Because it serves their cause.

Exactly, but Israel never challenges it, that's the point I trying to make, mizrahim must not only be seen, they and their back-stories must be heard. Loudly.

Doom-and-Gloom also wrote: so you're saying we must elect people based solely on skin color.

No, I'm saying no such thing, I'm saying it serves Israel's interests to have more dark skinned warriors in the front lines of the propoganda war. People choose who to vote for from those available, to increase the number of dark skinned Jews who can be voted for, more must be encouraged to step up to the plate, and the elites must refrain from blocking their ascent.

As for people voting on skin color, it happens all the time, Obama being the perfect case in point. He got to be president of the most powerful nation in history because he was black, yes he can talk up a good story, but ultimately it was his color that got elected.

Doom-and-Gloom and Tziona:

Thanks for the education you've given me in Israeli sociology. While I am Jewish only by Nazi laws rather than Rabbinic (wrong parent), and know only enough ancient Hebrew to stumble around in the Bible, I would still like to visit your country one of these days.

Kepha, from the color-obsessed USA.

Anyone knows,let alone remembers,the Nanking Massacre in 1937 ??

Ksidigarba:

The Nanjing massacre (as a teacher of Chinese, I now habitually use Pinyin Romanization, especially now since even Taiwan has taken it up since 2009) was the Japanese military's orgy of killing and raping after it took the [then] Chinese capital in the second Sino-Japanese War. After this, the Chinese government moved first to Hankou, then to Chongqing. I do not "remember" it, since I was not born then, but I have read about it.

Ksidigarba wrote:

Anyone knows,let alone remembers,the Nanking Massacre in 1937 ??
.........................

Like Kepha, I was not born at the time, Ksidigarba. But I have read about it many times. Iris Chang's devastating nonfiction book, the Rape of Nanking, deals with this atrocity.

Amy Tan's novel, the Joy Luck Club, also contains a number of scenes from this terrible period, as well as several survivors' journeys afterwards.

You are right in your implication, though. The Rape of Nanking—like the Farhüd, is not widely known.

But it is unlikely that the terrible Rape of Nanking—or anything like it—would be repeated by today's civilized Japanese.

I wish I could say the same for the Muslim world.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter