Iraq: Jihad-martyrdom suicide bomber in wheelchair murders two, wounds 17

Maybe this is why the TSA was so suspicious of Jean Weber. “Suicide bomber in wheelchair kills two in Iraq,” from AFP, June 26 (thanks to Zulu):

BAGHDAD: A suicide bomber in a wheelchair attacked a police station north of Baghdad on Sunday, killing two people and wounding 17, nine of them policemen, officials said.

“A suicide bomber detonated his explosives vest at the entrance to a police station, killing two civilians and wounding 17 people, including nine policemen in Tarmiyah,” a town north of Baghdad, an interior ministry official said. A defence ministry official confirmed the report.

“The suicide bomber came up to the entrance in a wheelchair,” said Colonel Tawfiq Ahmed al-Jenabi, chief of the town’s police, who added he did not know if the attacker was genuinely handicapped….

Afghanistan: Jihad/martyrdom suicide bombers murder at least 10 at Intercontinental Hotel
Muqtada al-Sadr thanks followers for pledging to attack U.S. troops in Iraq
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    “Maybe this is why the TSA was so suspicious of Jean Weber.”

    Right. Why, I bet the Iraqi suicide bomber was even 95 years old!

  2. says

    Iraq: Jihad-martyrdom suicide bomber in wheelchair murders two, wounds 17
    ………………………..

    This is *exactly* the same as using women”or those who appear to be women in Burqas”and children for suicide bombings.

    Whether this man was actually handicapped, or just posing as handicapped, does not matter. In all these cases, it is using someone who appears to be harmless”or less of a threat, in any case”and using them as a vehicle of murder.

    Of course, this is what suicide bombing in general does”it takes a person who looks like a civilian”a shopper, a restaurant patron, an ambulance driver”and conceals a killer.

    But this takes it a step further. It takes people who are usually considered the least threatening, and makes them a threat.

    It also”like so much Jihad”takes advantage of the basic decency of their victims, who will recognize innocence”or believe they are seeing innocence”and will regard it as such.

    Thus, violence that exploits innocence”or the appearance of innocence”is not only especially brutal itself, it will have the likely effect of brutalizing potential victims as well. They will have to”out of self defense”regard women, children, and the handicapped all as potential purveyors of violent Jihad, and act accordingly.

    God, I hate Islam.

  3. says

    I’ve noticed something new in my area where bikes are being chained up to Bike racks at the transit Station enterances and many stay there and rot in the rain and snow.
    Who would be on a budget where they use Public Transit that they also ride their bike to, BUT…they then don’t return to get the bike???
    There is a very tall (30 Floor) apartment unit near it and it would be easy for terrorists to video one frame per day and see how long a bike is allowed to be unclaimed or occupy a rack when it is stripped down and rusting.
    It’s far too easy to fill the hollow bike frame tubes with plastique explosives and ball bearings, then…watch from a nearby window for the maximum volume of people as victims to then set off a detinator remotely or have a timer. The other opition might be that it’s used for drugs to ride to the buyers and sell the druge and then dump the bike and buy a new one, very few cops pull the seat post tube out and look inside the frame for crack or powdered drug in bags.

    We are dealing with some very sick and twisted people that worship a pedophile/homopbobe/misogynist mass-murderer and
    are told that their Judgement comes while on earth, this means that they are given two choices…hope you get to go with Muhammed and bang tramps for eternity by your deeds on earht, OR..go directly to Paradise as a martyr and suicde-bomber that murders civilains for allah’s cause even if you must slaughter 10’000 innicent Muslim to kill 1 guilty unbeliever.
    Pretty pathetic that the “Moderate/peaceful” muslims live in a false reality that they are safe from the fascists
    while the rest must live in fear of being killed if they protest the 16’000+ terrorist acts sine 9/11.

    If I was in National Security I would make a Law that ANY Doctor or Surgeon can be jailed if they fail to report any Elective-Surgery on young males/females to remove heathy organs or do a *Intestinal-reduction operation for weight loss when the person is not Obese .
    The suicide-bomber of the future will have pro-terrorism medical workers in Shariah-law friendly Hospitals used for Taqqiyah terrorism to remove body part and moake room for bombs that are set-off from a outside remote unit.
    The Jihadist doesn’t care about Post-OP infections or how nice the Stitches are,their mission is to die and take as many infidels as possible to glorify Allah. And this means that a Muslim in the Military could pretend to be loyal bu then get access to a vet Hospital via conspirators and once in a room they plot to just walk into a crowed area and Kaboom …bang,zoom …to the moon Allah, to the Moon.

    A 7 year old was just used as asuicide bomber but the PR people in Canada claim it’s all lies to make the Taliban look bad. Say what…the Taliban is doing fine on theirwon to look bad ever since they blew-up the Budda statues and pro-taliban muslims in canada defended it.

  4. says

    When our Moslem Male friends put a 9 yr old girl in an exploding wheelchair, and and she has a hair lip and a lisp, plus a morbid stutter, and she’s a lesbian, and mildly retarded, and her parents died Mujahdeeds on a Moslem activism mass murder mission back in the 1980s, and she’s blind and deaf…

    … then they’ll have my attention.

  5. says

    So is it then logical to conclude that the reason Saudis cut off so many damn hands and feet is because they ultimately intend to stuff the prosthetic subsitutes with bombs?

    What’s next? Instead of silicon breast enhancements they’ll use binary liquid explosives instead to enhance the breasts hidden under the black burka garbage bags?

  6. says

    Random pat-downs of 6-year-olds and dying 95-year-olds in wheelchairs is still wrong if it is not accompanied by an effective screening method such as that used by El Al. The TSA refuses to do that, prefers to harass and intimidate American families rather than “offend” muslims. As ala sux points out, there is no end to the tactics jihadists can come up with. When you have something like the Obama administration in place, that means there is no end to the possibilities for exercising further control over Americans and calling it “security”.

    If we are fortunate enough to vote the Obamination out of office next year, the new administration needs to put it at the top of their list (yeah, before policing what Americans do in their bedrooms) to make these changes at the TSA in the name of freedom and security.

  7. says

    From http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com

    Judge Rules Nonprofit Can Sue Ex-Intern Accused of Document Theft

    – The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network can move ahead with a lawsuit against a former intern accused of stealing more than 12,000 internal documents, a Washington federal court judge ruled on Friday.

    The group is suing the former intern, Chris Gaubatz, and his father, author and self-described counterterrorism researcher Paul Gaubatz. The Washington-based Muslim advocacy nonprofit claims Chris Gaubtz posed as a Muslim college student as a ruse to secure an internship, and then stole the documents and e-mails for his father.

    That Chris Gaubatz obtained the internal documents and gave them to his father is undisputed; in Paul Gaubatz’s 2009 book, “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” he describes the plan at-length. The two sides dispute whether the documents were taken unlawfully and also whether the publication of the documents constitutes protected speech.

    You might want to get your copy of Muslim Mafia now, in case the judge decides to ban it forever.

  8. says

    ” They will have to”out of self defense”regard women, children, and the handicapped all as potential purveyors of violent Jihad, and act accordingly.”

    And then when these women, children, elderly, pregant, infirm and handicapped are subject to the same searches as young to middle-aged men, the jihadis will turn around and cry about how brutal and inhumane the searchers are, harrassing poor people in wheelchairs and preventing pregnant and sick people from getting to hospitals.

  9. says

    JeffS wrote:

    And then when these women, children, elderly, pregant, infirm and handicapped are subject to the same searches as young to middle-aged men, the jihadis will turn around and cry about how brutal and inhumane the searchers are, harrassing poor people in wheelchairs and preventing pregnant and sick people from getting to hospitals.
    ………………………..

    So true, Jeff. You already see that happening at Israeli checkpoints, with “Palestinians” complaining that they can’t get to their taxpayer-funded free treatment at Israeli clinics and hospitals quickly enough, because they have to be checked for explosives and weaponry.

    Of course, if Muslims didn’t use wheelchairs and ambulances in Jihad terror, this would never be an issue in the first place…

    Arafat wrote:

    What’s next? Instead of silicon breast enhancements they’ll use binary liquid explosives instead to enhance the breasts hidden under the black burka garbage bags?
    ………………………..

    Arafat, I’m afraid your comment shows why Islam is virtually parody proof. This story was covered here over a year ago:

    “Jihadists hiding bombs in breast implants”

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/03/booby-traps-jihadists-hiding-bombs-in-breast-implants.html

  10. says

    Good point. Anyone is free to bring suit against anyone else for any reason whatsoever, and CAIR is exercising that right. If the Feds have any sense, the suit will be dismissed as frivolous and damages awarded to Gaubatz. Further, they would reopen the case they have against CAIR, which was blocked for political reasons.