Hamas-linked CAIR rep insists that Sharia is not a threat, neglects to mention the bloody bits

Nezar Hamze is executive director of the South Florida chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). So it should come as no surprise that he leaves out of his explanation of why Sharia is not a threat all the aspects of Sharia that make people believe it is a threat. "Sharia law is not a threat," by Nezar Hamze in the Miami Herald, June 17 (thanks to all who sent this in):

You can’t turn on the news these days or pick up a newspaper without seeing or reading about Islam, Muslims or Sharia law. Unfortunately, most of what you hear is from politicians with a religious viewpoint or media outlets creating an illusion of an enemy.

They sensationalize Arabic words to feed on society’s fear. The hottest topic these days is the Sharia. They claim that “Moozlims” are trying to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Sharia. Before we all run out with pitchforks and protest signs, let’s understand what Islam is, and then we can understand the Sharia.

"'Moozlims.'" "Pitchforks." Hamze is semaphoring that the only people who could possibly be concerned about Sharia are ignorant racist yahoos. This is just a smear tactic, but it works insofar as it warns unreflective and uninformed Leftists (i.e., virtually all Leftists) not to dare to oppose Sharia: we wouldn't want to align with rednecks, now, would we?

Islam is an Arabic term deriving from two words: Salam, which means peace, and Tasleem meaning submit to the will of God. So the textbook definition for Islam is peace acquired through the submission to the will of God. Therefore, Islam conveys a practical application of God’s word to all aspects of one’s life.

Islam teaches humanity how to believe, worship and maintain their relationship with God. Islam teaches humanity the significance of family values and how to honor: mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles and cousins. Islam also teaches humanity how to deal with society, commerce, education, friends, neighbors, the poor, orphans, government, justice, property and, most important, the sanctity of human life.

Islam also teaches humanity how to deal with the kuffar, including the "unbelievers among the People of the Book," who are the "most vile of created beings" (Qur'an 98:6).

The Sharia is Islamic rulings from Muslim scholars and jurists that keep Muslims on the path toward abiding faith. The source of the Sharia is the Quran and teachings of the Prophet Mohammed. The Sharia covers all aspects of a Muslim’s life and explains what is prohibited and permissible.

Think of Islam as an instruction manual (the Quran and prophetic traditions) on how to live your life according to the will of God. The Sharia is the path of faith regarding those instructions.

Is Sharia a threat? According to Adam Hasner, a Republican candidate for the Senate from Florida and former state legislator, “Today there is an enemy, and that enemy is Sharia-compliant Islam.”

This statement is ridiculous. When I wash before praying, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I offer a greeting to someone, this is Sharia- compliant Islam. What in the world is Hasner talking about?

When I cut out a woman's clitoris, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I forbid non-Muslims to practice their faith openly, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I count a non-Muslim's life as less valuable than a Muslim's, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I brutally lash a woman, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I smash musicians' instruments and threaten them that they better not play music again or else, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I wage war against and subjugate unbelievers, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. What in the world is Hamze talking about? Does he really expect us to believe that Hasner is upset about washing before prayers and greeting people?

Some politicians, groups and individuals commonly reduce the totality of the Sharia to its penal code. The penal code within the Sharia is not unique to the teachings of the Quran and the Prophet Mohammed. It is also in the Torah and Talmud and part of the teachings of Prophet Moses. Having said that, it is important to recognize that regardless of the contrast, the penal codes within these texts are not the totality of the teachings of any religion and never explained as such. Why the double standard?

Well, for one thing, because even if it were true, which it isn't, that the penal code within the Sharia is identical to that of Judaism, Jews aren't stoning people to death and Muslims are. Jews aren't doing so because of age-old exegetical traditions that reinterpret the passages enjoining stoning and hold them inapplicable while there is no Temple; Muslims continue to do so because there is simply nothing within Islamic tradition mitigating the literal interpretation of the Qur'an.

It’s quite simple really — an election strategy.

What is Hamze doing? It's quite simple really — a deception strategy.

Politicians who emphasize religion in over 20 states have introduced some sort of legislation regarding Islam, Sharia or “Foreign Law.” They claim that the “Moozlims” are trying to infiltrate our court systems and replace our Constitution. The fact of the matter is, not one Muslim has introduced anything to any legislative body calling for Sharia to replace the Constitution or for the Sharia to replace the law of the land. This claim is absolutely baseless and really shows how disconnected these politicians are from the real problems on the ground.

In reality, Sharia has been involved in court cases in 23 states. And while "not one Muslim has introduced anything to any legislative body calling for Sharia to replace the Constitution or for the Sharia to replace the law of the land," that is only because they are not fools: to do such a thing would be very close to open sedition, and would draw upon the Muslims involved a torrent of popular disapproval and law enforcement scrutiny. Better to work behind the scenes. Remember Imam Musa, the Washington, D.C. imam who wants to establish an "Islamic State of North America no later than 2050." Remember the Muslim Brotherhood's program in the U.S. of "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

In some cases, unfortunately, this strategy is effective.

We can look at U.S. Rep. Allen West’s campaign as proof of its effectiveness. West routinely bashed Islam during his campaign, with statements such as,. “We are at war with Islam” and “Islam is not a religion.” He said that the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 were doing exactly what the Quran told them. He won in 2010.

Many Muslims say that Islam is at war with us. I believe Islam is a religion, but also more than a religion: a political system, and one that is repressive and authoritarian. The terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 stated explicitly that they were doing exactly what the Quran told them. We ignore or deny this at our own peril.

All we can do — must do — is try to stop this kind of rhetoric. Listening to it is a waste of your time. Those who espouse such views could not care less about the innocent Americans they hurt. The most effective way to deal with this situation is through education and action.

"Don't believe your lying eyes..."

Educate yourself on Islam. If you don’t know any Muslims, try to meet one. Say “Salam” (peace), and ask questions. Get to know them. Go to a ballgame, or go fishing. Be American together.

And when election time rolls around, send a clear message: I don’t discriminate.

I am all for people educating themselves on Islam. I strongly recommend it, in fact.

| 28 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

28 Comments

This is so nauseatingly and embarrassingly deceptive, cloyingly feel-good and pitifully easy to take apart I wonder why Nezar Hamze cares to put his name to it.

Vote "Muslim" or you're a bigoted racist. Lol.

http://ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com/ancient_hebrew_poetry/2010/05/krister-stendahls-three-rules-of-religious-understanding.html

(1) When you are trying to understand another religion, you should ask the adherents of that religion and not its enemies.

(2) Don't compare your best to their worst.

(3) Leave room for “holy envy.” (By this Stendahl meant that you should be willing to recognize elements in the other religious tradition or faith that you admire and wish could, in some way, be reflected in your own religious tradition or faith.)

======

know your enemy..

http://newstime.co.nz/sharia-law-punishment.html
Stoning according to ahadith Sahih Bukhari + Muslim

Finger Amputate & behadings of unbelievers (Q 47:4 + 8:12 “... smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them” 5:38 “(thiefs) cut off his or her hands”) & Eye Removal
according to Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, #261 --- repeated in Vol. 1, Book 4, #231

(graphic video) Warning: 01:00 – 1:45 ....

I refer to 'Christlam' to prove my point.. refer to point (3)

holy envy.. what horse shit.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=311473
Van Impe ministry abandons TBN in clash over Islam
Network turned back episode that challenged leaders over 'apostasy'

Van Impe explains that the Bible prophesies a one-world government and a one-world religion during the end times, and his concern focuses on the move among some Christian organizations to adopt some Islamic thought and incorporate elements of Islam into their worship.

"We've got too many of these mush-mouth preachers. All they're doing is two stories and a movie review," he said. But the Bible actually outlines that its messages also are to "reprove and rebuke" Christians for failing to live for God.

According to the broadcast, "Chrislam is a term that may be used more often among apostate churches."

Such Islamic and evangelical Christian leaders, the report explained, are working to find a way to promote "common beliefs the two religions supposedly share."

=============

Thank mormons for opening the door..

Smarmy, smug, dry-heave-inducing crap-master Hamze can shove his "religion" up his you-know-what.

I have repeatedly posted the blow comment on Miami Herald

The dhimmi (9:29) admin deleted it immediately for not accepting the truth

SHAME ON MIAMI HERALD THE ULTIMATE DHIMMI'S DHIMMI & COWARD QUSLINGS

http://newstime.co.nz/sharia-law-punishment.html
Stoning according to ahadith Sahih Bukhari + Muslim

Finger Amputate & behadings of unbelievers (Q 47:4 + 8:12 “... smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them” 5:38 “(thiefs) cut off his or her hands”) & Eye Removal
according to Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, #261 --- repeated in Vol. 1, Book 4, #231

No wonder many Muslims don't want to debate Robert Spencer anymore. He rips their arguments to shreds, as here. And this is being noticed by an ever increasing audience in America and throughout the West. Good.

And ultimately, as Islam is based on a lie, apologists must say what is Taqqiya-compliant as well as Sharia-compliant.

"Educate yourself on Islam. If you don’t know any Muslims, try to meet one. Say “Salam” (peace), and ask questions. Get to know them. Go to a ballgame, or go fishing. Be American together."

Ask questions? OK, the next time I meet a muslim then I will pose but ONE question upon meeting them ...

Why have you chosen to follow or identify yourself with an evil man like muhammad? ...the vilest criminal known to man!

Hey I seriously doubt that they'll want to go to ball game with me after that query.

Be American together.

Can't be done. Muslims are not and cannot be Americans, as General Secretary Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu candidly admitted in a speech at Columbia University on Sept. 18, 2008:

The Muslim Ummah, means the 'community of the faithful'. It is a unique bond that has no similar example under any other political or religious system in the world. It is a belonging to ideals which bring Muslims together in an eternal brotherhood lock which transcends all other consideration of allegiance or loyalties or barriers of nationhood, ethnicity, geography or language.

See also Verse 48:29 of the ignoble Qur'an, which mandates that Muslims be "hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves."

They are not us and we are not them. Ball games and fishing, indeed!

Correx: That's Organization of the Islamic Conference Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.

Love your closing line, Robert!
"I am all for people educating themselves on Islam. I strongly recommend it, in fact."

"Educate yourself on Islam. If you don’t know any Muslims, try to meet one. Say “Salam” (peace), and ask questions. Get to know them. Go to a ballgame, or go fishing. Be American together."

Living in Rotterdam, I know many Muslims, meet and speak to them regularly. And ask questions about Islam every once in a while. And would like to ask many, many more. But ... at present; all I get in response, in a nutshell, is either evasiveness or strife.

I DID confront Muslims occasionally with facts and logic and it became clear to me that they will avoid talking about Islam themselves, at least as soon as criticism is given. If I persist, then, it is my experience, that they either excuse themselves or respond so angry that the incentive for me to go on getting to know them about their religious beliefs is thoroughly discouraged.

And it is the same with the many Muslim-defenders around me, actually worse, because there are many more of them here. When engaging them in a real debate with real questions about Islam, then it soon becomes clear the discussion is unwelcome to them, they assert that it is too serious, too hateful, too phobic, as a matter of course. They invariably excuse themselves in some way, or change topic, and tell in clear verbal or body language that THAT topic is very unwelcome in the future.

And it is my contention that that attitude by Muslims and Muslim-defenders alike is provoking much more confrontational language from Islam-critical and real Islam-wise people. It often seems to me that respectful, begging-to-listen-style, polite discussing Islam just is not listened to or considered for any lenght of time and not effective. But legitimate complaints about real problems cannot be ignored and will not go away.

And that is why I refuse to give any one the right to NOT BE OFFENDED. And why I admire and support Robert Spencer so much.

We can look at U.S. Rep. Allen West’s campaign as proof of its effectiveness. West routinely bashed Islam during his campaign, with statements such as,. “We are at war with Islam” and “Islam is not a religion.” He said that the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 were doing exactly what the Quran told them. He won in 2010.

Yes, he won. Thank you, Col West for speaking the truth, and thank you to his constituents who elected him. I hope and wish more politicians would follow his and Geert Wilders' example.

@ Undaunted...I couldn't think of a better word than your "smarmy" to describe this bit of taqiyya.

"...one is either a Muslim who adheres to all aspects of Sharia law, or they are not truly Muslims. They are committing blasphemy and are Apostates if they were to describe themselves as moderates. Al Qaida and the Taliban have shown people thousands of times how they deal with a person who wants to be a moderate Muslim. They routinely behead the person (usually after they have tortured them for hours). There is no such thing in Islam as a moderate Muslim. A moderate Muslim is a person who is not practicing Islam as their Prophet Mohammed dictated to them."-Dave Gaubatz

So the bearded buffoon taqiyya artist is simply another "Akbar Zeb " or biggest dick ( not in the complimentary form) trying to con the unbeliever...spit...

'' ignoble Qur'an ''
Gonna borrow that one Papa Whiskey.

Sharia following Muslims are the biggest threat to all non-Muslim nations. the West is ignoring this threat which could result in its destruction - the ultimate dream of all Muslims.

Islam is both submission and peace...What this means to Kuffar is, convert to Islam by submitting (shahada), then you can have peace, if you refuse you will get war...
This is circular because when you get the peace of Islam, you also get the obligation to jihad, which is not peace...
So, you are promised something that Islam cannot actually deliver...I think this is called fraud...

Hamas-linked CAIR rep insists that Sharia is not a threat, neglects to mention the bloody bits
.................................

Of course, even without the "bloody bits" Shari'ah law is a horror of institutionalized oppression of women, children, and non-Muslims that codifies unequal treatment before the law.

Even leaving aside floggings, amputations and stonings-and their unequal handing down of such sentences—Shari'ah is still appalling.

"Marriage and family law" is its most seemingly civilized face, and the one that is held up most frequently to concerned Infidels.

Even here, though, Shari'ah is a hell of forced and underage marriage, polygamy, wife beating, unequal divorce and child custody laws, unequal inheritance laws, and mistreatment of non-Muslims.

While some aspects of Shari'ah are gaudier and more horrifying than others, *all* of it is profoundly unjust.

The *only* exceptions to the rule above are quibbling points of Islamic ritual, such as Wudu or the proper manner of wiping one's posterior with an odd number of small stones while facing sidelong to Mecca.

More:

"'Moozlims.'" "Pitchforks." Hamze is semaphoring that the only people who could possibly be concerned about Sharia are ignorant racist yahoos. This is just a smear tactic, but it works insofar as it warns unreflective and uninformed Leftists (i.e., virtually all Leftists) not to dare to oppose Sharia: we wouldn't want to align with rednecks, now, would we?
.................................

That's *exactly* what Hamze is doing—especially in the Miami Herald—many of whose readers consider themselves "enlightened liberals" in a state full of "conservative populist know-nothings".

More:

...So the textbook definition for Islam is peace acquired through the submission to the will of God. Therefore, Islam conveys a practical application of God’s word to all aspects of one’s life.
.................................

"All aspects of one's life"—sounds pretty benign, until you realize that this includes not only living under Shari'ah law, but imposing Shari'ah on Infidels, as well.

More:

Islam teaches humanity how to believe, worship and maintain their relationship with God. Islam teaches humanity the significance of family values and how to honor: mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles and cousins. Islam also teaches humanity how to deal with society, commerce, education, friends, neighbors, the poor, orphans, government, justice, property and, most important, the sanctity of human life.
.................................

Good God—where to start? Sometimes "honoring" mothers, wives, aunts, and children under Islam means *honor killing* them.

And what could be more laughable than the idea of the "sanctity of human life" under Islam? Except for the concept that a Muslim's life is worth more than that of a woman or infidel, of course...

More:

The Sharia is Islamic rulings from Muslim scholars and jurists that keep Muslims on the path toward abiding faith. The source of the Sharia is the Quran and teachings of the Prophet Mohammed. The Sharia covers all aspects of a Muslim’s life and explains what is prohibited and permissible.
.................................

Part of the "teachings of the Prophet Muhammed" include stonings. Nothing will "keep Muslims on the path to abiding faith" than stoning "adulterers" to death!

More:

Is Sharia a threat? According to Adam Hasner, a Republican candidate for the Senate from Florida and former state legislator, “Today there is an enemy, and that enemy is Sharia-compliant Islam.”

This statement is ridiculous. When I wash before praying, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I offer a greeting to someone, this is Sharia- compliant Islam. What in the world is Hasner talking about?
.................................

Even something as seemingly benign as offering greetings is skewed under Shari'ah, where a Muslim is not to greet a Christian or a Jew as an equal.

More:

When I cut out a woman's clitoris, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I forbid non-Muslims to practice their faith openly, this is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I count a non-Muslim's life as less valuable than a Muslim's, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I brutally lash a woman, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I smash musicians' instruments and threaten them that they better not play music again or else, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. When I wage war against and subjugate unbelievers, that is Sharia-compliant Islam. What in the world is Hamze talking about? Does he really expect us to believe that Hasner is upset about washing before prayers and greeting people?
.................................

Bravo, Mr. Spencer. Biting and accurate.

More:

Some politicians, groups and individuals commonly reduce the totality of the Sharia to its penal code. The penal code within the Sharia is not unique to the teachings of the Quran and the Prophet Mohammed. It is also in the Torah and Talmud and part of the teachings of Prophet Moses. Having said that, it is important to recognize that regardless of the contrast, the penal codes within these texts are not the totality of the teachings of any religion and never explained as such. Why the double standard?
.................................

Uh...maybe because Jews aren't stoning people to death, and, in fact, have not done so in millenia?

Also, the whole point about how the "penal code is not the totality of teachings" is grotesque. There was a lot more to National Socialism than the Holocaust, as well—but was a Jewish victim shoved into a cattle car on his way to Auschwitz supposed to spend his time contemplating the Nazi concepts of "lebensraum" or "entartete kunst", and content himself that Fascism was "not monolithic"?

Ridiculous.

More:

In reality, Sharia has been involved in court cases in 23 states. And while "not one Muslim has introduced anything to any legislative body calling for Sharia to replace the Constitution or for the Sharia to replace the law of the land"
.................................

No—but there have been calls for the imposition of Shari'ah. Besides Imam Musa and the Muslim Brotherhood, there is more. This story, from earlier this year:

"British jihadists Imam Anjem Choudary, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam, have announced that they will arrive in Washington next week to lead a rally calling on American Muslims to establish Shariah Islamic law and an ‘Islamic state in America.’"

http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2011/02/26/american-leaders-confront-call-by-uk-jihadist-cleric-who-urges-sharia-in-america/

The only reason these Jihadists didn't carry through their plan was that they couldn't enter the country. Doesn't change their message, though.

"If CAIR isn’t interested in introducing aspects of sharia law into the U.S. court system (as they claim) then why do they fight tooth and nail when attempts are made to ensure this doesn’t happen?"

Well said, duh swami.
I was talking to a Sudanese Muslim the other day and he was justifying and excusing Islam in north Sudan, saying that Islam did not conquer it by the sword (trade, those handy marriage laws and truces involving slave transfers, amongst other things, did the trick; he didn't bring that up.)
But then the north Sudanese, happy (apparently) to accept Islam, took out the sword to try and force it on the southern people, who were NOT happy to accept Islam.
There is no peace in Islam.

Hamze is a clown. Beyond ridiculous.

Just look at this whining piece of crapola he wrote after he was smacked down by Allen West:

Allen West "Brought Great Shame" to U.S., Says Muslim who Confronted the Congressman


At a town-hall-style meeting February 21, Nezar Hamze stood to ask Allen West a pointed question. Hamze, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations, asked West why he keeps claiming that the Qur'an instructs Muslims to attack America (read more about that exchange here). West cut Hamze off before he could say much more than that. So we asked Hamze to write up what he intended to say to West that night. Below is Hamze's response.

​Congressman Allen West was once asked by a Marine why people would warp the religion of Islam to attack America. Mr. West replied to him: It's not a perversion; they are doing exactly what the Qur'an is telling them to do. So I called him out on his statements.

It was a very simple question I asked: Can you show me where in the Qur'an it says to
attack America, kill Americans, or kill innocent people? He replied that the Qur'an was written before America existed and mentioned something about the verse of the sword and killing infidels. Unfortunately the crowd was so excited and so vocal against me that my response was cut off. Mr. West lost his composure and told me "not to blow sunshine up his butt." Then he said that I attacked America and told me to go home. For the record, I didn't go home; I returned to my seat and finished listening to his presentation.

Mr. West, you have brought great shame to the United States House of Representatives. Your behavior that evening represents the antithesis of our democratic republic. We look to our leaders to answer difficult questions with dignity and composure. Your behavior represented that of a military commander barking orders at a soldier. Mr. West, you are no longer a military commander, and I am not your enemy. You looked at me and said, "You attacked us, you attacked us." I didn't attack anything, and for you to accuse me of such horrific events is just as baseless as your knowledge of Islam. Terrorists attacked us on 9/11, Mr. West. Terrorists attacked us!

I grew up in Fort Lauderdale just like any normal American boy. I was heavily into sports -- baseball, football, wrestling, boxing, golf, triathlons, and karate. I also hit the gym pretty hard. I studied automotive technology and took a career path into management. I continued my education in business management and specialized in operations management. I have authored leadership development courses and facilitated training for multiple companies. There's just one thing that sets me apart from most other people: When I was a child, I began practicing Islam.

I grew up with many friends of different faiths and always got along. I would even go to church and temple with them every once and a while. I've always been a law-abiding citizen and often volunteered for different groups. I was a Big Brother volunteer as well as always volunteering for my local community functions at the Islamic Centers. I currently have four beautiful children, and I am happily married. My two boys are following in my footsteps, and my two girls are getting ready to start playing softball.

I recently started with the Council on American Islamic Relations as executive director. As an American Muslim that practices Islam, I have seen our society change over the last 30 years. In the '80s, the most controversial event the American Muslim community had to deal with was the film Not Without My Daughter. Oh, how the times have changed. Today's society, the American people are still looking for justice for the terrorist attacks on September 11. While America has held many accountable, we still have not seen justice. Some are trying to hold the American Muslim community accountable, and some even go as saying Islam attacked America -- as Allen West said to me.

Allen West was brought to my attention by a member of the community, referring me to clips of his campaign events. As you review the clips, you quickly see Mr. West is presenting himself as a critic of Islam to the American people, while teaching them falsehoods about our faith. He is not the only politician trying to score points with his constituents using Islam as the punching bag. This unfortunately has become a nationwide phenomenon. The critics of Islam self-proclaim scholarly knowledge and feed the American public twisted, perverted explanations of the Qur'an that have no base and support.

Mr. West, you have developed an autocratic style of rambling off dates and names of wars mostly regarding imperial armies and the Ottoman Empire. You never actually go into the details of the war, you just name them, insinuating Islam was the problem. You have also surrounded yourself with the nation's most hateful anti-Islam propagandist. During your campaign, these propagandists gave you a stage and fueled your audiences with anti-Islam insults. There is also documented history that you have had relationships with these groups before you ran for office, while you were stationed abroad. Your progression in the pronunciation of Arabic words is a clear giveaway that you are not learning about Islam from a learned Muslim -- you are learning about Islam from non-Muslims.

You mentioned the verse of the sword and something about killing infidels when I asked you to show me a verse in the Qur'an. Well, Mr. West, there is no verse of the sword in the Qur'an and no mention of infidels. The word infidel is not even an Islamic word. The term infidel was used by the Christian crusaders against Muslims. That's right, Christians used to kill the infidels (the Muslims). I have yet to read a Qur'an that has the word infidel in it. Please feel free to do some research on the origin of that word.

I encourage you to actually read the Qur'an and not take a sentence out of context and change the meaning and historical relevance to suit your own needs. You can also reach out to the Islamic community that lives in your district. I will encourage them to contact you as well.

Mr. West, I have tried numerous times to reach out to you and explain the backlash that your rhetoric is causing. I am on the ground dealing with the product of Anti-Islam propaganda every day. For you to ignore my concerns regarding the Islamic community is irresponsible and does not reflect credibility on the United States House of Representatives. You work for us, the American taxpayers. We don't work for you.

In closing, I extend my hand in friendship as a father, as an American, and as a civil servant. I am not your enemy. When I stood in front of you that evening, I was representing the American Islamic community and the rights of all Americans. To live in peace, practice their faith without being harassed, and not be insulted by a United States congressman. We have all made mistakes, and we should learn from them. You have a unique opportunity to build bridges with the Islamic community and apologize to us for blaming Islam for the terrorist attacks on our great nation.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

-- Nezar Hamze

http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2011/02/allen_west_nezar_hamze.php

"...most of what you hear is from politicians with a religious viewpoint or media outlets creating an illusion of an enemy."

...or so, in a typical attempt at diversion, he would have us believe. Actually, "what we hear" isn't so much what we "hear," but rather what we read, more and more of us (thanks in no small measure to Robert Spencer) about the basic facts of Islam as a religion and its historical record, the widespread trampling of human rights within Muslim societies, and by the importation of disgusting Islamic practices sanctioned by shariah into Western societies.

There is a Muslim Pathologist from Syria at my hospital. I was in the surgery lounge and happened to strike up a conversation with him about events in Syria. He was being critical of the the lack of support from the USA. I asked him why we should support the uprising. Were they fighting for The freedoms we hold dear or were they fighting for economic improvement. This lead to a discussion of free speech and how this basic right is lacking in the Arab world. I explained that the United Nations had succeeded in subverting free speech via their human rights charter influenced by the OIC. And that in Europe that being critical of Islam could land you in jail. He responded with the question "being critical or were they insulting". At this I really unleashed on him an explained that in a free society you have no right to not be insulted. Who would be deciding what is insulting. Everyone that heard something displeasing could claim to be insulted. The Christians could have discussion of evolution banned because it insults them. I ended the discussion by telling him if he really thinks that way he needs to go back to Syria.

I honestly believe that we will not convert them to be lovers of liberty and one day my children will be fighting a civil war with the Islamists. It deeply disturbs me that these people are in the country that I love.

''You have a unique opportunity to build bridges with the Islamic community and apologize to us for blaming Islam for the terrorist attacks on our great nation.''

The 9/11 murderers quoted from the qu'ran. Every terrorist, foiled or successful, has quoted from the qu'ran as his/her motivation.

So, if not islam, what should Americans blame these terrorist attacks on ? Oh, I know. 'A tiny minority of religious extremists, who have hijacked the peaceful religion of islam.' Spit.

Gravenimage -

nice analysis.

I'd like to zero in on this bit.

QUOTE Islam teaches humanity how to believe, worship and maintain their relationship with God. Islam teaches humanity the significance of family values and how to honor: mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles and cousins. Islam also teaches humanity how to deal with society, commerce, education, friends, neighbors, the poor, orphans, government, justice, property and, most important, the sanctity of human life.
.................................

Your comment: Good God—where to start? Sometimes "honoring" mothers, wives, aunts, and children under Islam means *honor killing* them.

And what could be more laughable than the idea of the "sanctity of human life" under Islam? Except for the concept that a Muslim's life is worth more than that of a woman or infidel, of course...'.

My reaction was pretty much the same as yours.

I would like to add a further comment, though. Look closely at that list of family relationships. There's one set of relationships that he leaves out.

"It says: how to honor: "mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles and cousins."

Notice that although he says 'children' he doesn't say 'daughters'. Or 'sons' for that matter.

And he doesn't mention siblings at all. He could have said 'siblings'. He could have said, 'brothers and sisters'.

But he doesn't.

A Freudian slip, perhaps?


Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter