Raymond Ibrahim: Kuwaiti female activist advocates Islamic sex slavery

Sharia: it's completely benign! Our friend Raymond Ibrahim offers some important observations on this story. "Muslim Woman Seeks to Revive Institution of Sex-Slavery," by Raymond Ibrahim for FrontPageMagazine.com (via RaymondIbrahim.com), June 6:

Last week witnessed popular Muslim preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini boast about how Islam allows Muslims to buy and sell conquered infidel women, so that "When I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her."

This week's depraved anachronism comes from a Muslim woman—Salwa al-Mutairi, a political activist and former parliamentary candidate for Kuwait's government, no less: She, too, seeks to "revive the institution of sex-slavery."

A brief English report appeared over the weekend in the Kuwait Times (nothing, of course, in the MSM):

Muslim men who fear being seduced or tempted into immoral behavior by the beauty of their female servants, or even of those servants "casting spells" on them, would be better to purchase women from an "enslaved maid" agency for sexual purposes. She [Mutairi] suggested that special offices could be set up to provide concubines in the same way as domestic staff recruitment agencies currently provide housemaids. "We want our youth to be protected from adultery," said al-Mutairi, suggesting that these maids could be brought as prisoners of war in war-stricken nations like Chechnya to be sold on later to devout merchants.

The Arabic news website, Al Arabiya, has the sordid details, including a video of Mutairi addressing this topic. I summarize and translate various excerpts below (note: I am not making any of this up):

The Kuwaiti female activist begins by insisting that "it's of course true" that "the prophet of Islam legitimized sex-slavery." She recounts how when she was in Mecca, Islam's holiest city, she asked various sheikhs and muftis (learned, authoritative Muslims) about the legality of sex-slavery according to Sharia: they all confirmed it to be perfectly legal; Kuwaiti ulema further pointed out that extra "virile" men—Western synonyms include "sex-crazed," "lecherous," "perverted"—would do well to purchase sex-slaves to sate their appetites without sinning.

Here's a particularly interesting excerpt from her taped speech on the rules governing sex-slaves:

A Muslim state must [first] attack a Christian state—sorry, I mean any non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the future sex-slaves] must be captives of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at all; according to Islam, sex slaves are not at all forbidden. Quite the contrary, the rules regulating sex-slaves differ from those for free women [i.e., Muslim women]: the latter's body must be covered entirely, except for her face and hands, whereas the sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is different from the free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to her husband, but the sex-slave—he just buys her and that's that.

She went on to offer concrete suggestions: "For example, in the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait; better that than have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations. I don't see any problem in this, no problem at all."

Mutairi suggests the enslaved girls be at least 15 years-old....

Read it all.

| 25 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

25 Comments

| Leave a comment

Be sure and forward this little tidbit to those folks who still don't realize or will admit that those folks at the gate and beyond are barbarians. Utter barbarians in shiek's clothing. Mr. and Ms. PC, have you met the seventh century?

Such is the savage and evil Islam and Nazi Arabic Imperialism - that will go on producing such evil but typical human beings like this Kuwaiti woman politician, who is calling for the legitimization of SEXUAL-SLAVERY of other women/girls especially if they're non-Muslims! I feel so sick reading this!

... learned, authoritative Muslims.

I won't trot out the usual "oxymoron" gag.

*** 33:21 ***

But, there could just be a non sequitur here: what exactly do these Ulemic dudes study, what do they know so much about?

Q: Islam is as easy as pie to understand, so why all the high falutin scholasticism?

A: They are authorizers, enablers, not scholars. And they're earning a nice buck, to boot.

What do you expect from a muslim like Mutairi? good things? Jesus said you can a tree by it's fruit, a good tree doesnot bear bad fruit, nor does a bad tree beart good fruit! Ms. Mutairi's fruit is certainly toxic spoiled and lethal!

This woman is scary! People generally talk about Muslim Women being at the receiving end of atrocities, injustice etc. but here is an example of a woman preaching the most heinous thing one could imagine! Is she even a woman?? Being a politician, is she doing this to garner more popularity amongst the predominant male parliament that identifies her tone from their personal lives? Pleasing Dhimmies aren't the only weird examples, we have considerable muslim women who love pleasing Islam and their own slavery! This is the weirdest school of thought I ever came across and beats Fascists in more quarters than others! Isn't there a name for this mental condition where a victim or oppressed starts sympathising with the oppressor?

Perhaps each new "Islamic Center" will have such a market, yes? To help build bridges, yes?

Alternatively, there could be an effort mounted to suppress the slave trade, to bring slave traders to summary justice and to repatriate sex-slaves, yes? Of course that would require that this problem be recognized in the first place.

Not to worry. The problem will be recognized eventually. At the latest, it will be recognized when it is realized that the "bridge" has firm footing only on one side, the side where the pirates are standing, with everyone else walking off the end suspended over the water.

Better to recognize it earlier. These creatures are planning to defile our loved ones, the ones who gave birth to us, raised us, loved us, taught us decency and morality, our mothers, aunts, teachers; those with whom we were raised, with whom we sometimes fought and squabbled but eventually grew up to understand how much we loved them as our sisters and cousins and childhood friends; the loved ones who we held in our arms when they were born and nurtured, watched as they grew older, stumbled and raised themselves up again, our daughters and nieces.

These creatures, befouled with an ideology that somehow continues to get a free pass today so far as general critical discussion is concerned, have very definite plans for us and those we love.

A Neighborhood Watch is required in the Global Village.

Here she is on English language Al Arabiya, accompanied by some apologetic waffle:

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/06/152054.html

Who needs laws regulating sex slavery in a religion where every sexual perversion is allowed?
"Threesome à la Muhammad"
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/04/threesome-in-islam.html

this women needs to be room temperature very soon, let her get ganged raped by her own people and stoned for letting it happen her, and say it's in the koran stupid!


From the article:

"She [Mutairi] suggested that special offices could be set up to provide concubines in the same way as domestic staff recruitment agencies currently provide housemaids."
_________________

These "offices" are already set up in the form of, literally, millions of, for instance, Filipina housemaids "contracted" to take care of the "little emperor" arab brats, and to "service" their older siblings.
These "offices" constitute institutionalized slavery, both sexual and financial.

Shame on you, Salwa, you are a disgrace to womankind and humanity on the whole. Many women and men are working very hard to elevate respect for women, while you and others like you are busy lowering the bar. One wonders how y'all live with yourselves.

These creeps must NEVER be allowed to get the upper hand over us, or life will be absolute hell.

Muslims have a huge number of real and imagined grievances, all of which will be avenged many times over when the time comes.

They are insulted and humiliated by just about everything the Kuffars do. Muslims envy the cultural, scientific and technical superiority of the Kuffars. They especially resent the colonial period when Kuffars occupied Dar al-Islam and built railways, roads, aqueducts, colleges and hospitals in a vain attempt to bring the inhabitants out of the Stone Age. Most of all, they resent the very existence of the Kuffar as an insult to Islam, Allah and the Pedophile.

Muslims are seething with barely repressed anger and the burning desire to avenge a million real and imagined insults. When Muslims finally get the power to wreak their revenge on the Kuffar, the release of pent up fury will be truly Apocalyptic - an unbelievably violent eruption of rage, rape, mutilation, torture, mass-murder and genocide which will make Attila, Gengis Khan, Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao seem like amateurs. http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/honor-shame-culture-and-humiliation-in.html

I think this article needs to be translated into Russian and circulated there, as widely as possible. After all, she is specifically proposing the seizure of *Russian* girls and women.

We have at least two Russians lurking and/ or posting here. Get cracking, guys. Let your countrymen know that some Muslims are dreaming of returning to the days of the great Muslim slave-raids against Russia.

"...the days of the great Muslim slave-raids against Russia."

"...The Tatars preferred to invade at harvest time when forage was plentiful. Smaller raids were made in early winter when the rivers were frozen. Davies says that the journey to Moscow took 55 days. Larger raids were led by the Khan in person. The core of his force was a guard of 200-1000 musketeers with light artillery and supply carts that could be formed into a wagenburg. The main force consisted of horse archers with reflex bows and short stirups. They also had sabers and lances and the richer ones might have chain mail, helmets or muskets. Each man took one or two spare horses. They carried few supplies, preferring to live off the land. The army traveled in columns. Beauplan estimated a column as 800 to 1,000 paces across and up to 10 leagues long. 'It was an amazing sight since 80,000 Tatars are accompanied by more than 200,000 horses'. On nearing enemy territory they camped for a few days and sent out scouts to be sure there were no significant forces in the area. After penetration they sent out two wings of up to 10,000 men each from the main body to sweep the country for 10 or 12 leagues around taking women, children, horses, sheep and cattle and those men who chose not to resist. When the wings returned to the main corps, other wings were sent out in the same manner. Having 'harvested' an area they withdrew by a different route. They did not waste time attacking fortified towns and avoided fighting organized forces unless they were forced to defend themselves. The returning columns, laden with booty, were most vulnerable to counterattack. The need to guard and escort captives kept the ratio of captives to raiders to about 1:3.[1]

Individual Mirzas would lead smaller-scale raids with a few thousand men. They would send out scouts to look for enemy forces and capture prisoners for interrogation and then sweep through an area 10 to twelve leagues broad, rendezvousing at a pre-arranged point each night. If attacked they would split into bands of about 100 men ('chambuly') and scatter in all directions, reuniting later..." More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muravsky_Trail

The Pakistani Army also kept numerous Bengali women as sex-slaves
http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/viewarticles.php?editorialid=1289

Backing up your account.

From wikipedia, on the Crimean Tatars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Tatars

'The Crimean Tatars adopted Islam in the 13th century and thereafter Crimea became one of the centers of Islamic civilization."

'Civilisation' (sic).

Nope, it was a typical Islamic hell-hole based on brutality, polygamy and slavery (to borrow from what another writer once said, about the Moros of the southern Philippines).

This is what that 'civilisation' did to its neighbours.

"Until the beginning of the 18th century, Crimean Tatars were known for frequent devastating raids into Ukraine and Russia.

"For a long time, until the early 18th century, Crimean Khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East which was one of the fundaments of its economy.

"One of the most known and important trading ports and slave markets was Kefe.

"**Some researchers estimate that altogether more than 3 million people, predominantly Ukrainians but also Russians, Belarusians and Poles, were captured and enslaved during the time of the Crimean Khanate in what was called "the harvest of the steppe".** {my emphasis - dda}.

Got that, everyone? More than **3 milliion people**.

" A constant threat from Crimean Tatars supported the appearance of cossackdom. The Cossacks often answered with similar raids into Crimea during which many Christian slaves were liberated.

"The last recorded major Crimean raid, **before those in the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774)** {my emphasis - dda} took place during the reign of Peter I (1682–1725)".

Three million non-Muslims, from southern Russia, Poland, and Belarus, seized and enslaved by the Tatar Muslims, between the 13th and the 18th century.

Next time anybody mentions the treatment meted out to the Tatar Muslims by the likes of Stalin, remind yourself that as far as I can tell from the rest of this same wikipedia article, the total number of Tatars killed or displaced during the Soviet era appears to have been significantly **less** than the total number of Russians and other non-Muslims from Central Europe who over preceding centuries had been seized and enslaved by the Tatar Muslims (and of course, those Muslim slave raids would have led to many, many deaths both directly and indirectly).

Ladies and gentlemen.

If you click on the link and read Mr Ibrahim's article in situ, you will see a *picture* of this evil woman.

Very modern and liberal of her to argue that these non-Muslim female slaves must be 'at least 15 years old'. / SARC/

They don't bother with those sorts of silly restrictions on age limits of the female sex toy, in the Abominable House of Saud.

Here, in the comments to this thread from six years ago,

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2005/10/pipes-arabian-sex-tourism.html

is a jihadwatch poster relating some of the events recorded in Jean Sassoon's 'Princess':

"Have you read 'Princess' by Jean Sassoon? She wrote about three books on similar themes...

"Two stories stick in my mind.

"One is of a 12 year old girl from Pakistan, {who might well have been Hindu or Christian, not Muslim - dda} sold to a Saudi man as a sex slave and being gang raped by him and his brothers."

Got that, everyone? A bunch of adult men. Gang-raping **a twelve-year-old girl**. Good god. When they had finished, would there be anything left of her at all, physically or psychologically? Infinite vileness, infinite ugliness, infinite cruelty. May the God of heaven and earth pour down fire from heaven upon the Abomination that is Islam. - dda

"Not only do the men not think it is wrong, but the Arab women think it is OK because men can't help themselves and in any case the girl has been paid for.

"Another story is of a girl in a modern hospital in Jeddah, about to give birth. As soon as she has had the baby she will be executed. Her crime? She was gang raped.

"Astonishingly, the writer completely exhonerates Islam from these and other horrors she describes. Yet the treatment of women is no worse than that meted out by Mohammed and his companions **and breaks no law in Islam** {my emphasis - dda}."
- Posted by: Interested at October 7, 2005 11:57 AM

(By the way, if you want to see a demonstration of just exactly what Islam does to the human mind, just read to the bottom of the same comments thread...you will find a mass of incoherent rants from a demented Mohammedan dementor, the reading of which - if you are brave enough to attempt it - is somewhat like wading through a swamp full of stinking slime).


Isn't there a name for this mental condition where a victim or oppressed starts sympathising with the oppressor?

Yes, it's called 'Stockholm Syndrome' and is a fair comparison to the complicity of muslim females in their own enslavement, physical and psychological abuse and torment, and virtual life imprisonment under the thumbs of male 'guardians', who must take every measure to preserve the chastity of their chattel; their honor depends on it.

Muslim females are indoctrinated from birth to believe the misogynist crap in the satanic qur'an and hadiths declaring their inferiority, inherent wickedness, and their obligation to submit not only to allah, but to their male family members and then their husbands. Marriage is nothing but a legal contract between two men, the seller and the buyer, legalizing sex between the 'bride' and the buyer and giving the buyer, or husband, total control over the sex organs, body, mind, and soul of the 'bride'. Any children resulting from the bizarre union belong to the man; the 'wife' is merely a vessel for bearing his spawn, a necessary evil. I don't know why they call it marriage because there is no love or affection, and most marriages are arranged by parents or relatives to first cousins. Islam discourages romantic relationships because a man's love for a woman might distract him from his obligations to allah.

Islam spawns the most ghastly, malevolent, perverted culture on earth and it is nurtured, promoted, and defended by its most beleaguered victims---muslim women. It amazes me that they defend an abomination that holds them in utter contempt, but most of them do. If they think their miserable lot in life is fair, who are we to disagree? If they are happy in their roles as second-class, inferior, domestic servants and sex objects with no rights or respect, so be it.


The biggest problem is that they want to victimize INFIDEL women, bringing them down to their same level of contempt.

Let's write to Congress (www.congress.org):

Dear Representative:

KUWAIT: A female political activist and former parliamentary candidate has recommended the introduction of legislation to legalize the provision of enslaved female concubines for Muslim men in Kuwait in a bid, she says, to protect those men from committing adultery or corruption. (Kuwait Times)

She talks like the typical long-conditioned domestic violence victim who has come to identify with the abuser. It is an Islamic Stockholm Syndrome in which the victim sells her soul, and the souls of other women victims, in order to regain some semblance of personal power and to make false meaning out of a meaninglessly victimized existence. It is much like a sex slave who endures it so long she turns into a "madam" in charge of a whore house and viciously makes young girls sell themselves. After all, she had to endure it and no one rescued her. It is a sickness which helps perpetuate the abuse.

This is also a signal by the global jihad. They are spurring and enticing with greed and lust those who would help take down the West "from within." They are using the carrot of plunder of the West at a time when violent jihadists are being quietly let out of jail. If the penal system were suddenly inundated with massive jihadists who had just murdered and robbed and raped in the name of Islam, would there still be a fear of being labeled Islamophobic in prosecuting them? If there was suddenly jihadists from all over the world (which has happened in Afghanistan and Iraq) causing mass jihad crime and insurrection, would there be governmental crackdown? With this President?

Along with outlawing Sharia law in our court systems, we should also make it a serious crime to attempt to enforce Sharia law. Gang crimes of rape and robbery and destruction of property carry stiffer penalties because of the heinous disregard for others in such organized crime. The global jihad is loosely organized but they still all have the same aim, to establish and enforce Sharia law. The motivation behind establishing and enforcing Sharia law is its promise of privilege and plunder to Muslims over non-Muslims. That includes sex slaves as the spoils of war (jihad), as promised by Muhammad. ("And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you." -- Qur'an 4:24, among other suras and Muhammad's own example in the Sunnah)

Muslims have the right to believe whatever they want, but they do not have the legal right to enforce Sharia law on anyone (yet anyway) in the U.S. It is your job to see that the U.S. Constitution and the equality guaranteed by it - that is so incompatible with Sharia law - is upheld. Please do so.

An excellent letter. I have used it, suitably edited, to write to my MP in support of Baroness Cox.

DDA

Thanks for pointing that out. The Crimean Tatars are always held as some sort of people native to the Crimea, who were expelled from there to Turkistan, under Stalin. But as it's pointed out, they were involved in terrorizing Ukraine, and allying w/ other Tatar and Turkic invaders of Russia. To make things worse, in the Crimean War, Britain & France decided that Turkey was worth preferring to Russia, and really set them back by capturing Sevastopol and keeping Russia from controlling the Black Sea (which Turkey got to seal even before the war, due to its control of the Bosphorus, Dardedennes and the Sea of Marmara)

P.S. Wikipedia uses American spellings, not British, hence the 'z' instead of 's' in 'Civilization' - a word which doesn't apply to any Taters, although it would have been more appropriate for the Mongols.

I dunno how seriously this guy should be taken. Sure, citing the woman is fine to show Islamic ideas but Raymond is questionable.

here

I haven't heard any solid responses to the claims this guy raised. I dunno anyone who's been to the event but any thoughts would be awsome.

Re the poster above who queries Raymond Ibrahim's credentials.

Mr Ibrahim is of Egyptian Coptic parentage, born and raised in the United States, but with mother-tongue fluency in Arabic.

In 2008 here at jihadwatch he was introduced in this manner:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/06/introducing-raymond-ibrahim.html

"Fluent in Arabic, Raymond has studied with Victor Davis Hanson, has an MA in History from California State University, Fresno, and has done graduate work in the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies of Georgetown University.

"He is currently working on a PhD in Medieval Islamic history at Catholic University. His op-eds, essays, translations, and al-Qaeda related analyses have appeared in publications including The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times Syndicate, United Press International, The Washington Times, Financial Times, National Review Online, The Washington Post, The American Thinker, FrontPage Magazine, and The Jewish Press, as well as in international publications. He has lectured at colleges and universities, as well as at governmental agencies, such as the U.S. State Department.

"Raymond works at the Near East section of the African and Middle Eastern division of the Library of Congress, where he discovered many of the never-before-translated Arabic texts that make up the bulk of The Al-Qaeda Reader."


I am disinclined to click on an unidentified link offered by a poster whose moniker I have never seen before - I recall regular poster duh-swami's advice about links that have 'bugs that jump' - but I do not, myself, see any reason to doubt Mr Ibrahim's scholarly and personal credibility.

I can't say that I myself have seen reason to doubt Ibrahim's credibility. If you are on Act's list then you probably got the message for posting on the college in Washington States facebook. Somebody from the Hamas-tied Cair cronies posted that link in response to all the support because of which the College came through and supported free speech. Even though this blog seems to be run by a nobody that goes to that college I think its more important to hear people's arguments than just look at their status so I went ahead and read it.

Anyways now I heard that the school isnt posting the video online so you have to actually physcially reside in Washington state near the school to see it. So theres no way for most of us to confirm this information. But I just find it troubling. I wouldnt put it past Hamas-tied CAIR supporters to lie outright but a lot of the points this person raised were troubling to me regarding Ibrahim's fluency in Arabic. I don't know Arabic but the parallels drawn to English equivilents very weird if he's such an expert in Arabic.

I just hope we have someone on this board whos been there and can shed more light on it. Or if someone has an after-market cell-phone cam ;P

I thought about confirming these things with some of the people mentioned in this man's blog post like the Humanities director or the Young guy but the second guy sounds like he'll be biased to support the Islamists and I doubt the former has enough time to reply to emails about this.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter