What could possibly go wrong? U.K. to release scores of "high risk extremists"

And they know now they will have trouble monitoring them. What exactly is the plan here? To hope they're overwhelmed with gratitude for the early release? "Public ‘at risk’ as 70 terrorists released," by Kevin Schofield for the Sun, June 1 (thanks to JG):

Up to 70 convicted terrorists due to be released this year will not be properly monitored, a probation chief warned yesterday.
The "high risk" extremists, some of them bomb makers, could be walking the streets after being freed on licence.
But Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the National Association of Probation Officers, said cuts to services meant adequate checks could not be kept on them.
He added: "They have to be supervised by us and the police at a fairly intensive level.
"My fear is as cuts go deeper we're going to be unable to give them the close attention that we have hitherto. These men require maximum supervision and we're not going to be able to do it."
Among those set for release are Saajit Badat, jailed for 13 years in 2005 for plotting with shoe bomber Richard Reid. Also due to walk free is Moinul Abedin, jailed for 20 years in 2002 for making bomb detonators.
MPs said Government plans to water down control orders that allow dangerous individuals to be put under virtual house arrest will make the problem even worse.
Labour home affairs spokesman Gerry Sutcliffe said: "I think there is a danger that the security services are going to be overstretched.
"I would urge ministers to keep control orders in place until there is a better alternative."
Tory MP Patrick Mercer said: "The system needs a radical overhaul to protect the public."
| 22 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

22 Comments

Are they being released early, or after time served? If the former, then I'd have to say the UK government has lost its everloving mind. If the later, and it's a concern that they havn't changed then I don't know- maybe they shouldn't be released? Perhaps there should be some system put into place through new laws suggested to and voted on by the public to allow for the continued incarceration of those who are still threats (if there isn't such a law already, which in that case should be used).

Perhaps a release program that comes with a free body bag. No crowding space in jails, no worries about tracking terrorists and no money spent on their upkeep.

Labour home affairs spokesman Gerry Sutcliffe said: "I think there is a danger that the security services are going to be overstretched.

Not just the security services, but the British taxpayer funding the mahoundians' welfare checks (which also end up as remittances to their relatives in Porkistan and Somalia) and free upscale housing.

I just get prouder and prouder of my nation :-)

(MASSIVELY SARCASTIC)

The official that signs these terrorist's release forms should be sitting in the dock with him when that muslim commits his next crime on the street.

I'm sure they have all learned their lesson..............

In less politically correct, much less wimpy times & places, a proven terrorist was hung, not given a few years in prison to look forward to resuming activities. A dead terrorists is not a problem. Live terrorists, like the ones described above and about to be released are a very expensive problem. But the Brits are so civilized and sensitive that instead of dead terrorists they would rather have innocent dead Brits in little blood-covered pieces. A small price to pay in their minds, I guess, to avoid all the stupid condemnations they would have to endure for disposing of caught terrorists.

As the ancient Greeks would say, "Against a man's stupidity even the gods are helpless".

I do not understand the dynamics of the British system, which gives light sentences to attempted mass murderers, and then paroles them to the street. I'm not talking about agreeing or disagreeing with it. I don't understand it.

Could someone with knowledge of the matter let me know how the British system functions like this? One can generalize about the decline of the British character, socialism, etc, but there must be some specific dynamic which mandates this type of extremely dysfunctional action by the British authority.

"...cuts to services meant adequate checks could not be kept on them."

It would be interesting to see a list of all the "services" and the amounts that they are cut. One would think that keeping dangerous criminals locked up for their full terms would be one of the most important services that government could provide.

You all think British justis is weak and pathetic, well you need to come and see what they do to you if you drop litter on our streets, or have no road tax on your car. And watch out if you struggle to pay your council tax bill. You commit any one of these crimes and you risk losing you car your home your liberty. So don't go thinking just because none of that applys to radical muslims that we are a push over..... unless your a radical muslim.
And as for the 70 bomb jackets there releasing...it makes no differance, this country lets them in by the thousand every month. Huh whats another 70!

What could possibly go wrong? U.K. to release scores of "high risk extremists"

Cucumber 'jihad'?... Careful with those 'halal' fish and chips.

"Up to 70 convicted terrorists due to be released this year will not be properly monitored, a probation chief warned yesterday."

[pausing to refill shot glass] . . .proceed to add above to the mind blowing list of PC/MC cultural suicide news from the once grand ole isle . . .from this week alone!:

One Week in the Death of Britain by Paul Weston, June 1, 2011
"The rapid descent of Britain into a racial, cultural, economic, moral, educational and societal ruin continues apace. The following stories are gleaned from newspaper articles printed in just one week:

We learn that despite David Cameron’s lofty ambition of reducing immigration to the “tens of thousands”, a record 586,000 immigrants arrived on the shores of this small island in 2010. As a result, 344,000 disillusioned people immediately voted with their feet and emigrated. Many of those leaving would have been indigenous Brits, although this cannot be verified because there are no real border controls.
Amongst the new arrivals was Zimbabwean Phillip Machemedze, one of Robert Mugabe’s secret policeman and torturers. Despite committing murders too gruesome to describe, Machemedze will be allowed to live scot-free in Britain at a cost of £50,000 per-annum to the British tax-payer, who must fund HIV treatment for both himself and his wife.

If murderous foreign criminals are whimsically imported into liberal democracies, one can only reasonably expect the expected. The violent crime levels prevalent within our vibrantly diverse communities are therefore astonishing only to the liberal/left.

A prime example is Santre-Sanchez- Gayle, a black contract-killer aged only fifteen who has just been jailed for the shot-gun murder of a young Turkish mother, Ms Gulistan Subasi, allegedly on behalf of her Turkish boyfriend. Gayle was paid a fee of £200 which he subsequently and somewhat improvidently spent on a Dolce and Gabbana beanie hat.

Amongst the initial targets of the investigation into Miss Subasi’s murder were members of Turkish crime syndicates in Britain, who control up to 90 per-cent of heroin coming into the country. The Serious Organised Crime Agency estimates there are 6,000 such criminals in the UK and that Turkish “Godfathers” were now subcontracting “hits” to the alienated teenagers of England’s myriad black street gangs.

In Birmingham, a white father and son were seriously injured by three knife-wielding black youths as they bravely sheltered an Asian boy who had desperately banged on their front door seeking multicultural assistance. Martin Thompson and his eighteen year-old son Edward suffered multiple stab wounds, including a punctured lung. The Asian youth was unharmed.

In Milton Keynes, two Somalis, Mohammed Farah and Amin Ahmed Ismail were shot dead in an execution style, leading police to believe it was a gang-land drugs hit. The town is situated in the stock-broker belt of Buckinghamshire and is home — believe it or not — to a close-knit Somali community of around 10,000…

Milton Keynes police handed out leaflets written in Somali in an attempt to “reassure” the community, but tactfully avoided the inharmonious revelation that 1 in 3 Somalis suffer from some form of violent mental illness brought about by exposure to civil-war brutality.

In Tower Hamlets, East London, a gang of four Muslim men launched a horrific attack on a white Religious Education teacher because they did not approve of him teaching Muslim girls. Azad Hussein, Sheikh Rashid, Simon Alam and Akmol Hussain armed themselves with iron rods and beat 28 year old Gary Smith into a bloody pulp. Mr Smith suffered a brain haemorrhage, permanent facial scarring and both long and short-term memory loss.

Also in Tower Hamlets, which is now run by an Islamic Council, street names are being changed into Urdu and homosexuals are being asked to refrain from appearing on the streets in public. Gay-free zone stickers are appearing throughout the borough, but this is not mentioned by the BBC or MSM because in the wonderfully wacky world of Political Correctness, Islam trumps homosexuality.

Read more »"




Lan astaslem
لن استسلم‎

We are now watching the popular TV show "Just how stupid the UK can be?"....

There should be a law in UK that stated: Any muslim who commited crime in the name of Jihad or Islam or Allah shall be punish by dead, the punishment should be conducted using gun with swine blood or swine feces covered bullets!.

I can guaranty this law will drop terrorism rate in UK down to zero in no time

Tory MP Patrick Mercer said: "The system needs a radical overhaul to protect the public."

Yup, like shooting the Jihadist bastards.

I suppose they will tell everyone wherever these creeps are living that they have a real live terrorist living in their street - mind you if they are Muslims they will hero worship these pieces of shit.

My GOD, that article is depressing!

Mr. Collins:

You are so right, and not just in Britain. Some political writers have a name for this scheme of government: anarcho-tyranny.

No resources to protect the public from terrorists that set off bombs in public places like they did on 7/7. But they do have resources to give out parking tickets, cite pedestrians for jay-walking, or homeless people from peeing in public.

Yep. They certainly have their priorities straight, and know what constitutes the most important danger to the public.

Here's hoping the cutbacks on the Probation front have equated to an investment in intelligence and remote monitoring.

@tanstaafl: "I'm sure they have all learned their lesson.............."

Allah guarantees victory to the pious Muslim in his struggle against the infidel. So there are only two possible lessons for any Muslim jihadist:

Alternative 1: Allah was not behind me. I was not sufficiently pious. I need more Islam! I need to pray more, to study the Koran more carefully, and to take the open-ended commandments therein much more literally, especially those from Sura 9. To prove my piety to Allah, I need to develop a bigger, better plot that is way more violent, because I lost points with Allah during my last one. My ticket to heaven is in serious jeopardy! I lost a lot of ground sitting in jail all those years, when I needed to be out there waging jihad. So a spectacular bloodletting against infidels is probably the only thing that will make up the deficit in my personal virgin allocation.

Alternative 2: Allah was behind me. I had a great plot, but got caught by those arrogant, contemptible infidels. As the Koran says over and over, the only possible explanation for this thwarting of Allah's will is devious manipulation by the dastardly Jews with their global conspiracy to control the world. In my next plot, I must avenge this insult to Islam by settling the score. I must kill many infidels, scoring triple points for Jews. As always, the more the better to please Allah and thereby to secure my spot in heaven.

Both alternatives lead to the same wretched result: killer zombie.

The reluctance or inability of our government to legislate to protect the nation from extremists shows a serious flaw in our judicial system which is surprising when you consider that a great many parliamentarians are lawyers themselves.

Among those set for release are Saajit Badat, jailed for 13 years in 2005 for plotting with shoe bomber Richard Reid. Also due to walk free is Moinul Abedin, jailed for 20 years in 2002 for making bomb detonators.
...

Foolster41 wrote:

Are they being released early, or after time served? If the former, then I'd have to say the UK government has lost its everloving mind.
.......................

Unless my grasp of math is worse than I think it is, Foolster, these vicious Jihadists are getting out after only a few years.

Here in California, hundreds of prisoners are being released early—partially due to overcrowding, partially due to the fact that the state is virtually bankrupt. We have been reassured that no violent criminals are being released, but—as you can imagine—many of us are quite skeptical.

Still, it is even worse to *knowingly release violent Jihadists*.

Madness, and suicidal madness.

The only time jihadists should ever be released from the custody of any country is after being lobotomized. Only when jihadis are reduced to drooling imbeciles will humanity be safe.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter