Al-Qaeda members part of new Libyan government recognized by U.S.

But they say they've renounced al-Qaeda, so all is well. They couldn't be lying, of course. And if they've renounced al-Qaeda, that must mean they're moderate, right? That must mean they've renounced jihad, and Islamic supremacism, and the oppression of women, and dhimmitude, and the denial of the freedom of speech and the freedom of conscience, and are practically by now registered Democrats, right?

"Exiled Islamists Watch Rebellion Unfold at Home," by Souad Mekhennet and Eric Schmitt for the New York Times, July 18:

LONDON — Abu Sohaib spends most of his time online these days, following the news from his native Libya. He is in constant contact with friends on the ground there, helping them map out strategy to fight the rule of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

“I would like to be there myself; I tried to go,” he said, pausing to look at the car keys in front of him. “But Tunisia and Egypt wouldn’t let me in even after their revolution.”

Abu Sohaib, his nom de guerre, is on a watch list for suspected terrorists not only in Libya and its neighboring countries, but also in some European countries. He is a senior commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a former militant organization that once was aligned with Al Qaeda. The New York Times is withholding his real name because he said he fears for his safety.

Today, members of the group have renounced Al Qaeda and are part of the mosaic of rebel fighters united under the umbrella of the Transitional National Council, the opposition leadership that the United States formally recognized as Libya’s legitimate government on Friday.

American, European and Arab intelligence services acknowledge that they are worried about the influence that the former group’s members might exert over Libya after Colonel Qaddafi is gone, and they are trying to assess their influence and any lingering links to Al Qaeda.

Oh, great. Then all is well. As if anyone in the American, European and Arab intelligence services would even dare to ask the right questions of these people they're "assessing," or even know what these questions would be.

The group, whose fighters number more than 500 men, including many with combat experience in Iraq or Afghanistan, was part of the social fabric of eastern Libya, its leaders say. Its members’ relatives are in Benghazi, the wellhead of opposition to the government in Tripoli. Its fighters opposed Colonel Qaddafi in the 1990s, were captured and died in Abu Salim prison in Tripoli. They hid from Qaddafi security forces in the caves in Darnah until the Libyan revolution. In short, many Libyans say, the men are seen not as an alien, pernicious force but as patriots.

They fought in Iraq and Afghanistan for the jihad and against the U.S. Now we've recognized them as the government of Libya and are helping them out.

Libyans have held positions in the Qaeda ranks in the past, with the most prominent men being Abu Laith al-Libi and Abu Yahya al-Libi. “It is easy to change a name and say, ‘We are not part of Al Qaeda,’ but the question is if they have changed their ideology and I doubt it,” said a senior Arab intelligence official.

An American intelligence official who follows North Africa said that dozens of the former group’s members trained and fought alongside militants in Pakistan’s lawless tribal region.

Abu Sohaib insists that he and his brethren have severed ties to Al Qaeda and have warned the terrorist group it is not welcome in Libya. “It has been made very clear to them, that it is better for them to stay out of the country,” he said....

The formal American recognition of the rebel leadership allows the rebel government access to $30 billion in Libyan assets held in the United States. Of that, however, only about $3.5 billion is in liquid funds, and the rest in real estate and other Libyan government investments, State Department officials say. It is unclear how and when the money will be distributed to the transitional government, and what oversight mechanism will be placed to monitor it....

The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group was formed in 1995 with the goal of ousting Colonel Qaddafi. Driven into the mountains or exile by Libyan security forces, the group’s members were among the first to join the fight against Qaddafi security forces, although the new transitional leadership has sought to distance itself from the fighters because of their past ties to Al Qaeda. “We wanted to live in a country in which we can live and promote Islam the way it should be,” said Abu Sohaib. “We are sure Islam is good for everyone.”

Except non-Muslims, women, apostates, etc. etc. etc.

Abu Sohaib is a soft-spoken man in his mid-40s, well built and well trained, as his biceps show under his checkered chemise. He has lived for many years in Britain; before that he had been to Saudi Arabia and also Afghanistan and Pakistan. “There was a time when the British wanted to hand us over to Muammar el-Qaddafi , though they knew we would be tortured,” he said, staring at his hands.

He was in Afghanistan and Pakistan waging jihad. And now we are helping out his compatriots.

That distrust of the West still gnaws at other members of the group. A 36-year-old Libyan associated with the fighting group who goes by the nom de guerre Abu Salah and who travels between Europe and Libya said: “We start to question the true intentions of the West in Libya. If they would have wanted to kill Muammar el-Qaddafi, they could have done it several times. I guess this is about making as much money with oil and weapons deals as possible.”...

As always, Islamic jihadists and Islamic supremacists express their lack of trust of the West, not the other way around. The assumption is always that they control the moral high ground. This is another manifestation of the same phenomenon that we see after every jihad plot in the U.S.: law enforcement and media reassuring the Muslim community, instead of the other way around.

“Isn’t it interesting how they were hunting us for years and were working with Muammar el-Qaddafi?” said Abu Sohaib, referring to the United States, which after Libya disbanded its unconventional weapons program in 2003 worked closely with Libyan authorities to combat terrorism. “Now we are cooperating with NATO and the West, those who used to put us in jail.”

Yes, it's very interesting.

| 10 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

10 Comments

WHAT??! This guy is living in Britain and has done ''for many years''. .and the authorities have turned a blind eye? Crazy ain't the word.

Why in the world is the US involved in Libyan affairs at all? If the rebels have a reason for excluding al-Qaeda, they will do so. Since Ghaddafi was no longer supporting terrorists or looking to build nuclear weapons, the West has no reason to intervene in his government.


The last thing we need is to be drawn into another Middle Eastern conflict with nebulous allies, vague enemies, and both sides committed to an Islamic government.

Heh heh - you couldn't make this crap up, could you? If you submitted it as a film script, you'd be thrown out of the guy's office for wasting his time...

"Why in the world is the US involved in Libyan affairs at all?"

Exactly! The only U.S. involvement in the Libyan (or Syrian or Yemeni) situation should be in selling ammunition to both sides. For top dollar. In cash.

Whooooopeeeee for our brilliant, conciliatory foreign policy experts Hillary Rodham Clinton and Samantha Power, to say nothing of our hyper-intelligent Uebermensch of a President! We end up becoming supporters of one more regime that hates us to the very marrow of its bones! [sarcasm off]

I'll grant that Moammar Qaddafi is and was a thug and an enemy of the USA. But, at least he could be persuaded to give up a WMD program, and, from his looks, might have been a natural son of one of the Marx brothers (Groucho, Harpo, Chico, or Beppo, not Karl). Next step: the New Libya keeps on being a haven for terrorists, and perhaps a source of mercenaries for Sudan's next push against its now separated south or for further Islamicist trouble in Africa.

"The New York Times is withholding his real name because he said he fears for his safety."

The New York Times certainly doesn't have a problem with revealing the names of CIA covert operatives when they come across them...

With you, Kepha. Sure, Qadaffi is a disgusting excuse for a human being, no doubt about it, but most telling is that his opposition may very well be more disgusting.

Wait, I take that back, most telling is that we have totally clueless people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama directing American foreign policy. As Lord Acton and so many other historians have noted, the collapse of a civilization ordinarily comes from within, not from without. The Clintons and Obamas of civilized societies are actually the real problem, the ultimate problem, and not the barbarians knocking at the gates.

What have we accomplished in overthrow attempts of Khadaffi by aiding the muslim rebels? Nothing!

Hillary Clinton is definitely f**ked up in the head. I remember when 9/11 happened, she started this lie that Canada was responsible because Canada didn't check out the terrorists and let them in. The US, trusting in Canada's integrity with respect to terrorism, allowed these guys to enter without looking into their background.

This was something she repeated over and over. Later, the Canadian Government had had enough, and revealed that the opposite was true. The US had issued multiple entry visas to the 9/11 terrorists and Canada had let them into our country under the same trust that Clinton had talked about (but from the other side).

Needless to say, Clinton never issued an apology.

All this happened when she was a Senator and as a Canadian I didn't like it but I understood it at least. Or I thought I did. I thought it was a cynical ploy to keep herself in the public eye for a time when she would be running for president.

Now she's Secretary of State and she's brought back the same accusations again; it seems, albeit, through her doink Janet Napolitano.


By the way, can any of the US Jihad Watchers tell me how this dimwit Napolitano got her position in the government? She must have the goods on somebody in high places.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2009/04/21/napolitano-border-canada021.html

It is strange that Hillary Clinton would bite the hand of an ally and ally with a hand that would bite.

This al-Qaeda 'alliance' is going to cost the USA big time and by the time it is over, the USA will have lost all political, moral, ethical, and religious credibility it has in the world. Any nation in the world would be crazy to trust the US as an ally after this.

Maybe that is what she and Obama intend for the US: to turn it into just another insignificant country with no special say in world politics.

If so, they are playing a game of self-castration with their country and if they are successful the world will go to hell in a hand-basket. Maybe that's what Obama and Clinton want as well.

If Obama would stop all the money funding these type of groups and nations, maybe he would have some money to pay off our debt or help Americans. This sure shows Obama and his clans true intentions, which are not good.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter