China: Jihadists hijack truck, kill driver, plough truck into crowd on sidewalk, and murder six people at random

But it's all right -- they were responding to decades of oppression, doncha know. "Ten die in Xinjiang knife attack, blast," by Peter Parks for AFP, July 31:

Ten people were killed in a knife attack and blast in China's ethnically-tense Xinjiang region at the weekend, state media and authorities said Sunday, in the latest bout of unrest to hit the area.

A knife attack in the ancient Silk Road city of Kashgar on Saturday saw seven people killed and 28 hurt by two knife-wielding assailants.

One of the attackers was later killed in violence that erupted at a night market, government authorities said.

Hou Hanmin, spokeswoman for the government of the northwestern region, told AFP the attackers were both members of the mainly Muslim Uighur ethnic minority, adding the suspect who was still alive had been detained....

An explosion rocked city on Sunday, killing three people, including a police officer, and injuring three others, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

Police had already detained two suspects, Xinhua said, although it was not immediately clear what had caused the blasts....

Uh, maybe jihad?

According to tianshannet.com, a website run by the regional government, the suspects in Saturday's attack hijacked a truck that was waiting at a light at the food market in Kashgar, not far from the border with Kyrgyzstan.

They killed the driver, ploughed the vehicle into passers-by on a nearby pavement, then got out of the truck and stabbed people at random, leaving six bystanders dead before the crowd turned on them and killed one attacker.

An English-language report from Xinhua said two blasts were heard before the incident, saying the first came from a minivan and the other was heard almost simultaneously and originated from the market....

Dilxat Raxit, a spokesman for the Germany-based World Uyghur Congress -- an exile group -- cited local sources as saying the assailants had clashed with members of a civilian force that maintains public security.

"This incident is hard to believe but must be addressed. Beijing should accept the responsibility that repression triggered this incident," he said.

Of course. It is never the responsibility of the jihadists or their allies. And as always, it is a response to oppression -- although ironically, we never seem to see this kind of behavior from the non-Muslims who suffer oppression in Muslim societies such as Egypt, Pakistan and Indonesia:

Many Uighurs are unhappy with what they say has been decades of political and religious repression, and the unwanted immigration of China's dominant Han ethnic group.

While standards of living have improved, Uighurs complain that most of the gains go to the Han.

This tension has triggered sporadic bouts of violence in Xinjiang -- a vast, arid but resource-rich region bordering Central Asia, home to more than eight million Turkic-speaking Uighurs.

Earlier this month, more than 20 people were killed in a violent clash with police in the remote city of Hotan.

State media quoted an official in Xinjiang as saying that clash was a "terrorist" attack, adding that four people including a police officer were killed when a crowd set upon a police station.

But Uighur activists called it an outburst of anger by ordinary Uighurs and said security forces beat 14 people to death and shot dead six others during the unrest.

Here is a more realistic account of what happened there.

In the nation's worst ethnic violence in decades, Uighurs savagely attacked Han Chinese in the regional capital Urumqi in July 2009 -- an incident that led to retaliatory attacks by Han on Uighurs several days later.

The government says around 200 people were killed and 1,700 injured in the violence, which shattered the authoritarian Communist Party's claims of harmony among the country's dozens of ethnic groups.

China threw a huge security clampdown onto Xinjiang after the violence, and many Uighurs are enraged by the arrests and alleged disappearances of people rounded up across the region in the aftermath....

Ah, even Uighurs play the victimhood game. Has Honest Ibe Hooper flown over to Xinjiang to give them lessons?

| 15 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

15 Comments

| Leave a comment

"Ethnically-tense", wow!. A new term invented for an area where Muslim's are doing what Muslim's do. Is this a replacement for "restive", or can they just be used interchangeably, or in tandem, like in,

"Restive, ethnically-tense, killing fields of Islam".

Despite their Marxist past, you can bet the Chinese won't be inhibited by political correctness in dealing with this problem. China may well be the 'last man standing' when the jihadists have reduced the rest of the world to anarchy.. http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2011/03/how-to-destroy-islam-non-violently.html

Years ago, a militant Black Panther shot and killed a police officer in Berkeley Ca, as an execution...The philosophy was that the people were being oppressed and needed to rise up...If the militants start killing policemen, there will be more policeman on the street, more oppression, and eventually the people would revolt...
The Uighur's commit violence, the Chinese authorities punish them...Then the Uighur's commit more violence and China punishes them some more...If this cycle keeps up, China will be under jihad attack on numerous fronts and become Islams #1 enemy...Or at least #3, right under Israel and the US...

"Many Uighurs are unhappy with what they say has been decades of political and religious repression, and the unwanted immigration of China's dominant Han ethnic group."

Now let's change just a couple of words: "Many Europeans are unhappy with what they say has been decades of political and religious repression, and the unwanted immigration of Middle Eastern Moslem ethnic groups."

But if the Europeans reacted to the unwanted immigrants in the same fashion as the Uighurs do, they'd be called "racist" rather than "restive". It's interesting how the MSM applies different standards in similar situations. In Europe, the natives are the "bad guys" and the incomers the "good guys"; in China it's just the opposite.

"Many Uighurs are unhappy with what they say has been decades of political and religious repression, and the unwanted immigration of China's dominant Han ethnic group".

Now they know just how African Christians must have felt when the Islamic hordes slowly took over their land and peoples. Unfortunately the Christians never really fought back...

And just what is wrong with the Chinese Han moving within their own country...oh wait...they're non-Muslim and had better not move to those Muslim enclaves within their own country...HEY UK...take note...Once you allow Muslims enclaves within your own country you will lose any right you have to move through and live in your own land..

Don't get to happy that China is being dragged into this holy war. They might not suffer under the burden of human rights but they still need oil.

It's unfortunate, not to say disgusting, that JihadWatch is taking the side of Communist China in its oppression of ethnic and religious minorities, simply because this particular minority are Muslim. Do you take the same attitude toward Tibetans? How about the Irish struggle for independence?

Muslims are not always "so-called victims" or players in some "victim game." Sometimes they are victims pure and simple. The Han Chinese here are engaged in genocidal actions against Uighurs, not religious debate against Muslims.

OK, now bring on the hordes of Srebrenica-Massacre-denying messagers to call me an Islamophile....

Pulsar182:

>And just what is wrong with the Chinese Han moving
>within their own country...

Oh. So all of China belongs to the Han and anyone else who's lived there for thousands of years can just get the hell out of the way as the Han invade and appropriate their natural resources for the good of the Han. So nice to see so many supporters of the Red Chinese on this forum.

........"a plague on both your houses".........

do you have any Idea where the Han people gained there ethnic name? its because the Han dynasty! the han dynasty controlled most of Xinjiang at the time around the birth of Jesus. right that time the Han immigrants to the xinjiang are living peacefully with the locals because they are predominantly "buddhists". Now guess why and when this area become predominantly Islam? and why they speak one of turkish language insdeed of indo-european? I bet you have the answer. And the answer is Jihad! A mass jihad start by the Turks from 9th century to 11th century! Now what is wrong for the Han people start to move back to one of their historical territory that was plagued by the Islam Jihadists?

Rusol:

>And the answer is Jihad! A mass jihad start by the
>Turks from 9th century to 11th century! Now what
>is wrong for the Han people start to move back to
>one of their historical territory that was
>plagued by the Islam Jihadists?

Yes, we definitely must put right any invasions that took place in the 9th to 11th Centuries and further on. Our Native Americans are certainly going to be happy to hear that. And let's not forget about the Sudetenland....

Again, while I hate violence, I have very mixed feelings about this news.

The Chinese Communist state's attitude towards colonized peoples (and their own dissenters) runs a gamut from paternalistic to savagely repressive. In Sharki Turkistan and Tibet, Communist China is lying in a bed it has made itself. Add to that the special Communist talent for waxing indignantly self-righteous about how it "liberated" people while killing off their indigenous leaders, urinating on those people's most sacred traditions, forcing violations of conscience, and then pushing the "backwards natives" off to one side.

The Chinese will kill the Jihadi Uighurs without compunction. The Uighurs, however, will be very, very different from the peaceful and isolated Buddhists of Tibet, as they belong to a congenitally violent religion and also have the support of the global islamic network - right across China's borders with Pakistan. China can look forward to living in interesting times.

Let's look at this situation, given what we've learned about Islam and the jihad imperative.

If there were no *ethnic* division - if everyone in Sinkiang were of one ethnicity, whether Uighur or Han - but half of them were Muslims and half were not, then I have no doubt whatever that Jihad would still be raging (or simmering, commensurate with the perceived strength of the non-Muslim forces).

(Let's remember that in South Asia the Muslim Pakistanis and the Muslims of Bangladesh are, basically, of the same ethnicity as their neighbours in India, but they hate them like poison and are waging Jihad against them).

And let us bear in mind that if the Han were as scrupulously restrained in their conduct toward the Uighur Muslims as the Israelis are toward the local Arab Muslims, it would most likely not make a skerrick of difference; indeed, since the Infidels would be perceived to be weak, the Jihad would probably be even worse than it is.

And if China said to the Uyghurs, "fine, we'll leave, you can *have* your independence", does anyone here think that there would be no more Jihad waged, ever, from across the border of Muslim East Turkestan, into China? The moment the Muslims thought they could get away with it...the moment their non-Muslim neighbour showed the least sign of weakness...push, push, push, the probing and raiding would commence.

If the Chinese left Tibet tomorrow and gave them their independence, I don't think they'd really need to bother their heads about aggression from across the border; the Tibetans would not be in the least interested in picking a fight with their powerful neighbour.

But a Muslim Sinkiang would be an entirely different kettle of fish.

A word in China's ear.

Don't forget about the Hui.

Don't get complacent about the Hui.

And: **watch** the Three Gorges Dam.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter