For once, the president of the Malaysian dhimmi political auxiliary called MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association) is correct. Dr. Chua Soi Lek has correctly stated that if the opposition stays in power at the state level, or manages to take control of the national government, the treacherous infidels will only lose more of what little rights they have left. Following up our initial story on the upcoming shutdown of business in the Malaysian state of Kedah during Ramadan, "Rights will be eroded if PAS remains in power, says Chua", in The Star, 16 July 2011:
KUALA LUMPUR: Kedah's ban on certain entertainment outlets during Ramadan has served as a warning on the erosion of rights if the opposition party is allowed to continue to be in power.
The decision conflicted PAS' promise to protect the interests of people of all races, said MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.
He condemned the announcement made by Mentri Besar [the state governor] Seri Azizan Abdul Razak on Thursday.
“(With this incident) We can imagine that decisions made by PAS may erode the rights and freedom of the non-Muslim, should they gain power whether at state or federal levels.
“We disagree with PAS' move as it is a form of coercion for the non-Muslims in the state,” Dr Chua told reporters after attending the MCA Federal Territory 2011 Annual Convention here yesterday.
Chua must be some sort of Islamophobe. Surely he must know, from all the fawning coverage of Islam in Malaysia, that Islam is the very embodiment of 'moderation' that abhors coercion. Right? After all, every taqiyya-laden spokeperson and useful idiot loves to quote Quran 2:256, the abrogated verse that states "let there be no compulsion in religion".
But if the opposition took over, that would not change one iota, and in fact could even accelerate under the tender mercies of PAS. PAS, which is a pro sharia, pro Jihad, Islamic supremacist party, is a major component of the opposition coalition.
Malaysian politics is a no win situation for Dr. Chua and his kind. In other words, "Heads the Muslims win, tails the kafr lose."
"'Erosion' of non Muslim rights" is all Islam can deliver. It lives parasitically off the 'others' anywhere it takes root, same as it had in its "golden age" centuries ago. If it had no compliant victims to feed off of, those who fell subservient to it in 'submission' slavery, it would have died long ago.
Today it is enabled and empowered by the foolish ruling 'elites' who imported Islam into their home countries. But rather than elevating their home cultures, they are finding out (all too slowly) that Islam needs to feed off its host like a parasite, by making more and more demands to accommodate its world supremacist ambitions. 'Multiculturalists' hypnotized by their own foolish social theories, hypothesized they can help their host countries, and themselves (with votes), by bringing in Islamic immigrants. But they are discovering the opposite is true, that their pathetic 'imports' are a drain on national resources, as they are adept at deceivingly scamming the systems for its welfare largess. Islam is unproductive, any Islamic country will testify to that, so it cannot survive without 'eroding' the rights, hence violating the labors of the host country, to feed off of. This is as true in Malaysia as it is in France, England, Germany, Sweden, Lebanon, etc. Islam's modus operandi is a pathetic waste of human resources, as I elaborated in the 'Palestinian' problem in the Middle East: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/the-palestinians-31-opportunities-for-statehood-squandered-in-favor-of-genocide.html#comment-803369 And since Islam cannot assimilate into our Western Freedoms cultures with any competence or integrity, there is no hope of change for them.
All one can do for Islam is cut if off, isolate it globally, all 1.2 billion of it, and let it die a natural death. Horrible that death will be, millions suffering, mass famines, inter-sectarian wars, 'restive' social dislocations (including inside the host countries who imported them), suicide attacks across the social spectrum, 'no go' areas, etc. It will be Allah-hell. But until the fever breaks, the host is suffering a malady that cannot be cured any other way, other than to destroy the disease. Let them go the way of nature's law, as any parasite must eventually go. But don't let them kill the host as they had done repeatedly through their "golden era" of Islamic conquests. Better to cast them out.
Without allowing it to feed off its host, it is powerless, so stop enabling it. France, Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, Austria, even Germany is beginning to wake up to the tragedy of their useless Islamic 'imports', and now have begun taking steps to stop their empowerment. First with outlawing the burqa, but then more to follow, like closing down mosques and deporting hate preaching imams. Ultimately, it will mean removing large segments of a hostile population. But they have to act fast, as the 'imports' are breeding like flies, and will soon engulf them demographically in numbers. This is a lesson seemingly still not understood by England, Canada, nor even the US, though they're getting the picture in Australia. Islam adds nothing to our well being and cultural success, certainly nothing to social productivity, and everything to those undesirable traits such as crime, oppression of women, child and sex slavery, drugs, and violence at all levels, from crazed taxi drivers running down pedestrians, to wild eyed jihadis trying to kill as many civilians as they can. Do we really need this? No!!
No more Islam, stop 'imports' and the problem becomes isolated to their doleful origins. Let Islam die, get off their oil, and it will go the way nature meant for such a regressive, atavistic, slavishly subservient, primitive, unproductive 7th century theo-political ideology in the 21st century is meant to go: Down. Put it down. It is the most merciful thing we can do. They are powerless without us, because Islam needs us as hosts to feed off of. But if we let them, they can cause lots of trouble, more than we ever imagined. Whole civilizations and cultures fell victim to parasitic Islam in its "golden age", so they no longer exist. Stop enabling them, stop all aid to Islamic countries, whether military or humanitarian, stop wasting money and precious national resources on them.
They will die. Once the host turns against them, and uses its natural 'anti-bodies' to stop its spread, Islam is powerless. Our constitutional laws protecting our natural human rights and freedoms are out 'antibodies' to fight their regressive parasitic Sharia invasions. We are healthier and stronger than they are at all levels. So stop empowering the disease, and it will die naturally. No hard feelings, just there is nothing that Islam, nor its sick culture and barbaric moral values, can add to the betterment of our world. Extinction of Islam is the greater mercy here. Do it while we still can do so with ease. Later, it will be harder. Put it down now. We don't need them. Islam is dead.
I've been to Malaysia twice in my life, so I don't claim to be an expert. As an outsider (U.S. citizen), one thing struck me about this country was the division of ethnic groups. In general Malays in their own areas, Chinese in theirs, and East Indians amongst their own. For all the multicultural propoganda coming from the Malaysian government, it seems to have a very sectarian milieu. Divide and conquer? Is that the M.O. in the Islamic World?
New IMF chief, Christine Lagarde (finance minister, gallic surrenderist entity) was a vigorous partisan for "islamic finance." I'm sure Hamas will use the IMF as a free candy store under her tenure.
http://www.redstate.com/marcuscarey/2011/05/18/new-imf-chief-wanted-paris-to-become-islamic-banking-center-and-theres-more/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG3UWPVieK0
I've been following this Anti-Jihadist very closely and he usually only targets the majority ruling UMNO and MCA. As you can see from the headline, the Anti-jihadist brought down the ruling Chinese-dominated MCA (although the ruling Malay-Muslim party UMNO is evil, but at least it is in alliance with Chinese dominated MCA and Indian dominated MIC, to form the majority ruling BN Govt - so there's hope for reform as in the news here) for trying to stop PAS but Anti-jihadist never condemn the Chinese-dominated Communist-Maoist loving party DAP of the Opposition as a Dhimmi to Islam, which is in bizarre but most dangerous alliance with the the Islamic Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood/Qardawi-loving Anwar Ibrahim of PKR party and the thuggish Iranian-Mullah like Muslim extremist party, PAS, to form the Malaysian OPPOSITION party! I found out the hard truths after voting like a fool of the Opposition in the last Malaysian election – Anwar & PAS pretended to be moderate in order to win naïve non-Muslim votes, who also thought that DAP was sincere and pretended to be modern Socialist - but DAP is bowing to Islam, in order to gain some ruling power like in Penang. Once the Opposition get into power in some states in Selangor, Penang, East & North Malaysia, Islamic supremacy became dominant and the Sharia laws became more aggressive. Thus, teh only hope right now for Malaysians especially non-Muslims, is to take back those states from the Opposition since the Opposition is more dangerous, and will turn Malaysia like savage Pakistan!
Katharina apparently feels that by criticising the government, or by criticising any part of the ruling coalition, that this automatically makes me a loyal follower of the Malaysian political opposition.
She says she's been 'following my work closely', but clearly she hasn't read my work very well.
To quote from this piece, I wrote:
But if the opposition took over, [the erosion of non Muslim rights] would not change one iota, and in fact could even accelerate under the tender mercies of PAS. PAS, which is a pro sharia, pro Jihad, Islamic supremacist party, is a major component of the opposition coalition.
I suppose writing this makes me a loyal supporter of the opposition, perhaps? Katharina evidently thinks so.
The same idea comes up over and over. What's the difference between Hamas and Fatah? The difference betwwen Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood? The difference between Al Qaeda and ISI? Like PAS and UMNO, all are distinctions without a difference, as far as this infidel's concerned.
Hi Katharina.
I'm wondering if there is any way you can talk Jihad Watch into letting you write a couple of articles that introduce readers to the politics of Malaysia.
There is so much going on in what you just explained in your compact comment that I can't sort it out (but I want to). Malaysian politics are far too complicated and the associations among the various groups are too convoluted to keep things straight in the mind.
Right now, I think if I read in a newspaper article about a coalition between any two of the groups you mentioned, I wouldn't be sure it that was a good thing or a bad thing.
Even if most other Jihad Watchers know this stuff backwards and forwards, it must be remembered that new readers keep coming to this site and they may be as uninformed as I am.
Just as an example of what I'm talking about, I never ever would have noticed anything noteworthy about anti-jihadists editorial approach. Even now, I'm not sure what that approach means. I know it does mean something otherwise you wouldn't have mentioned it.
Sooooooo, I would hope that we might have a couple of informational articles to clarify a complicated political labyrinth.
Peter,
In case you're looking to educate yourself on the byzantine world of Malaysian politics, I invite you to read my post entitled "The Infidels' Guide to Malaysian Politics."
URL: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/the-infidels-guide-to-malaysian-politics.html
And in case Katharina or anyone else still things I'm in the tank for the Malaysian political opposition, here is a quote from that piece:
...the Malaysian left devote(s) a lot of thought, words and space in their writing to the alleged evils of corporations, globalization and 'Islamophobia'. At the same time, this crowd usually downplays or completely ignores the jihad and the ever-growing stack of dead bodies the jihadists are piling up. Or they apologize and rationalize for Islam after the fact. "Yes, Muslims can be barbarous," they might say, "but it's all because of Iraq / Islamophobia / Palestine (fill in the blank)." Oftentimes, Malaysia's political left can get quite chummy with their Muslim overlords. The DAP's chairman has gone on the record to say that, in effect, Islam is just a wonderful belief system. 'Useful idiots', anyone?
Anti-jihadist, as usual, you try to manipulate facts. I don't criticize you because you're anti-Govt but because you've been writing against Islam, by being biased greatly against the ruling UMNO, MCA and BN (even when MCA, tried to challenge PAS bravely, you have to condemn it so biasedly). The Arabic FATAH of Palestine doesn't have non-Muslim alliance doesn't it; thus to compare it with UMNO is deceitful. You seldom reveal the true face of the Malaysian Opposition most dangerous alliance of the Chinese-dominated Communist/Maoist-loving party DAP of the Opposition as the real Dhimmi to Islam, which is in bizarre but most dangerous alliance with the Islamic Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood/Qardawi-loving Anwar Ibrahim of PKR party and the thuggish Iranian-Mullah like Muslim extremist party, PAS, to form the Malaysian OPPOSITION party!
Malaysian politics is not yet the same like in savage Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt or elsewhere where Islamic rule is absolute. This is because in Malaysia, we have a big percentage of strong non-Muslims, around 40% - this is why, Malaysia is not an Islamic country like those savage Islamic nations. Further, the non-Muslims in Malaysia are not a small minority as in those savage Islamic nations. Thus, the (non-Communist) Chinese-dominated MCA and Indian-dominated MIC can still reform the half-moderate Malay-Muslim UMNO (although PAS infiltrators are hijacking UMNO, turning it to be more fanatical - imagine if MCA and MIC are not in the alliance with UMNO; how dangerous it would be for Malaysia and non-Muslims).
Thus my intention, is to prevent such calamity as in these other savage absolute Islamic-ruled countries, which will be if the Malaysian Opposition control all Malaysia. They're already causing havoc with Arabic-style aggressive Sharia laws in their few states that they control. In the West, we can try to criticize Islam aggressively, in the hope of destroying Islam's dominance and aggression because in the West, is mainly free to do so. But in Islamic-ruled countries, it's not possible to criticize Islam as much as we want; thus my perspective is in terms of the practicality in terms of achieving some justice due to the complex politics of dynamically multicultural Malaysia. Just by criticizing Islam alone instead of the complexity of politics behind it, is not enough to protect the non-Muslims in Malaysia, but by being smart and to ensure that the Islam practised in Malaysia do not cause much more suffering to the non-Muslims or even liberal Muslims, including under the Opposition rule right now. But as I realized after voting like a fool of the Opposition; how dangerous the Opposition is where such suffering of non-Muslims and liberal Muslims are exacerbated. Because Islamic rule once become absolute in all Malaysia, especially as dreamed by the Muslim Brotherhood/Iran through the Opposition Anwar of PKR and PAS of oil-rich Malaysia, it will be too late then like what’s happening in Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen right now.
Hi Peter, thanks for your kind interest. Unfortunately, I'm not a writer. Thus I might be able to comment, usually in short forms, but I don't have the capacity to write full-length articles. I hope my short comments will be useful to some people.
Thanx Anti-Jihadist. I don't know how I missed this article. Usually, I go through the JW Newsletter every day and add the articles to my database.
So your article is appreciated and it did clear up a fair amount of the confusion I had (and that amount was considerable).
One comment, I think you may have misconstrued what Right-wing really means. That may have presented you with that distasteful problem you experienced of categorizing the Malaysian jihadists in the same group as you categorize Robert Spencer.
Right-wing doesn't mean anti-Shariah or counter-jihad but it is guaranteed that anyone who is a right-winger will be so.
Right-wing means committed to the politics in which the individual and individual rights take priority over the state. A right-winger believes that rights follow the Common law understanding of the term in which they represent protections from state intrusion and abuse on the individual. Such rights are absolute and inalienable.
Right-wing is a spectrum of political philosophies but all will centre on the individual even at the extreme end where we find fascism.
Leftists believe that the state and the collective supercede the individual and that rights are 'fraternal' and a gift from the collective. Fraternal rights are contextual and removable.
Fraternal rights are empowerments from the state to the collective that create obligations on members of society on behalf of other members of society. Welfare rights, for instance, create an obligation on one side of society (through taxation) to support another segment of the population that can't support itself. Sometimes this right is referred to as an entitlement.
Left-wing is a spectrum of varying philosophies the centre of which will be the state or the collective. Strangely, anarchism is considered the extreme in left wing politics and yet this philosophy is counter to the state or the collective.
So reading your article I'm wondering if Malaysian politics are totally Left-wing? If so, that really must be a convoluted system of government. It is also a system, in which, no matter how a citizen votes, he loses as a person.
How could such an organization ever fight Islam and Sharia? There is something I'm still missing I think.
I hope JW decides to ask you to do at least one more of these informational posts on Malaysian politics. You weren't granted enough space the first time to do the topic justice.
Regarding Katharina, I don't think she believes you are in the tank (as I understand the term). If I've read her correctly, she believes there is another component to the story and that component is consistently being ignored in your articles. Due to that, she is expressing a concern regarding objectivity. Her concerns may be unwarranted but she has to express them if she wants to retain intellectual honesty. So, what she is saying is fair game in my books.
Having said that, I do understand that you are granted a limited amount of space for what you do at Jihad Watch and that your editorial obligation is to balance the space allotted to you with the issues you feel are most important to discuss with the JW members. That is fair game in my books too. It's not only fair game its your job. So you are between a rock and a hard place (several of them actually) so the readers have to understand and accept that.
Perhaps in some of your future articles you can address the issues in Malaysian politics with which Katharina is concerned. Being the curious type, I would like to know about them too.
Anyway, I do appreciate your articles and I do look forward to seeing tons more in the future.
Have a nice day.
Hi Katharina, my pleasure.
Tell you what, think about it.
If you decide you have the information JW readers need to know but you are concerned that you might not be able to present it in a way that meets your high standards then let me know. I will give you my email address and you can send me your ideas.
I will do my very best to produce something that does justice to your ideas, is 100% in keeping with them, and meets whatever high expectations you have on literary merit (It will already have the scholarly merit because it will comply with the information from your email.)
You can then edit and amend what I send you and submit it to JW for consideration as a publishable article for this site.
The offer is open, ad infinitim, so you don't have to decide now. In the meantime you can continue your fun with The-Anti-Jihadist.
I hope my short comments will be useful to some people.
Yup! Well, I can only speak for myself but there are a few posters at this site for whom I do a quick scan after reading an article. Your name is one of them.
That is why I'm offering to help in this. It's payback time on my part.
Take care have a nice day.
"TROJAN HORSE KATHARINA"
EVERYONE READING THIS - PLEASE DO NOT TAKE "KATHARINA" VIEWS AS KOSHER/HALAL.
ITS DISINFORMATION IS MEANT TO DISTORT THE TRUTH BY REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY.
THIS PERSON IS A " TROJAN HORSE" SET UP BY THE NEO FASCIST UNMO GOVERNING PARTY AS PART OF THEIR PSY-OPS TEAM.
THEY HAVE SUCCESSFULLY EXPOUSED THE FICTION OF "MODERATE ISLAM" TO THE NAIVE WESTERN PRESS.
Peter, thanks for the offer - but I prefer to provide short comments where I can challenge, especially non-truthful articles more affectively. I'm not trying to win my argument but if it can help some people see the light of day, I'm happy enough. Everyone contributes in fighting injustice, especially against PREDATORY evil like Islam here, in different ways, no matter how small it is.
'simon wiesenthal' - wow, many Muslims now cowardly use a Jewish name; usually to lie so pathetically! So, if you're a 'Jew' then, you don't have a problem with the savage Jew-hating of the Opposition Party of the Islamic Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood/Qardawi-loving Anwar Ibrahim of PKR party and the thuggish Iranian-Mullah like Muslim extremist party, PAS? UMNO is evil, yes - but at least it is in alliance with he (non-Communist) Chinese-dominated MCA and Indian-dominated MIC, that can still reform the half-moderate Malay-Muslim UMNO (although PAS infiltrators are hijacking UMNO, turning it to be more fanatical - imagine if MCA and MIC are not in the alliance with UMNO; how dangerous it would be for Malaysia and non-Muslims)! Get a civilized education - instead of being continuously brainwashed by the Opposition Arabic/Iranian Nazi-like Islamic propaganda!
Keep up the great work Anti Jihadist. I've been in Malaysia long enough to know that there is no middle ground here when we are talking about PAS or UMNO. One is not more evil or savage than the other and UMNO's alliance with MCA and MIC does nothing to prove it's desire to protect the rights of EVERY Malaysian citizen.
Sadly, the face of politics in Malaysia is so closely entwined with racial lines and that results to an explosive combination. Politics is combustible enough without adding racial mix to it.
I'm all for equality and justice for every Malaysian and I don't think it will ever be achieved if we have umno OR the opposition party (with the unfortunate PAS coalition) in power.