Finally, a word on the Times hit piece, in which I am a significant presence, and yet neither Scott Shane nor anyone else at the Times bothered to contact me for any comment whatsoever. "Killings in Norway Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S.," by Scott Shane in the New York Times, July 24 (thanks to all who sent this in). The first clue as to the bias of Scott Shane comes in the title's reference to "Anti-Muslim Thought," as if I am fighting against human beings, rather than against a radically intolerant and repressive ideology. Seven years ago here at Jihad Watch I had an exchange with an English convert to Islam. I said: "I would like nothing better than a flowering, a renaissance, in the Muslim world, including full equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies: freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, equal employment opportunities, etc." Is all that "anti-Muslim"? My correspondent thought so. He responded: "So, you would like to see us ditch much of our religion and, thereby, become non-Muslims."
In other words, he saw a call for equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies, including freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, and equal employment opportunities, as a challenge to his religion. To the extent that they are, these facts have to be confronted by both Muslims and non-Muslims. But it is not "anti-Muslim" to wish freedom of conscience and equality of rights on the Islamic world -- quite the contrary.
[...] His manifesto, which denounced Norwegian politicians as failing to defend the country from Islamic influence, quoted Robert Spencer, who operates the Jihad Watch Web site, 64 times, and cited other Western writers who shared his view that Muslim immigrants pose a grave danger to Western culture.
Jihad Watch commenter Kinana of Khaybar analyzed these 64 citations here, and concluded: "Breivik himself has apparently 'quoted' Robert Spencer by pasting in large unprocessed chunks of material from 3 different sources--the documentary, the crusades piece, and the article on Muslim persecution of Christians. Needless to say, Breivik never in his approximately 1500-page 'compendium' quotes Spencer as supporting his (Breivik's) 'revolutionary' views, values, methods, proposals, and objectives.
More broadly, the mass killings in Norway, with their echo of the 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City by an antigovernment militant, have focused new attention around the world on the subculture of anti-Muslim [sic] bloggers and right-wing activists and renewed a debate over the focus of counterterrorism efforts.
17,000+ Islamic jihad terror attacks since 9/11. Two non-Muslim terrorists: Tim McVeigh and, sixteen years later, Anders Breivik. And Scott Shane suggests that the "focus of counterterrorism efforts" should be shifted from Islamic jihadists to "the subculture of anti-Muslim bloggers and right-wing activists."
In the United States, critics have asserted that the intense spotlight on the threat from Islamic militants has unfairly vilified Muslim Americans while dangerously playing down the threat of attacks from other domestic radicals. The author of a 2009 Department of Homeland Security report on right-wing extremism withdrawn by the department after criticism from conservatives repeated on Sunday his claim that the department had tilted too heavily toward the threat from Islamic militants.The revelations about Mr. Breivik’s American influences exploded on the blogs over the weekend, putting Mr. Spencer and other self-described “counterjihad” activists on the defensive, as their critics suggested that their portrayal of Islam as a threat to the West indirectly fostered the crimes in Norway.
Yes, of course. There is no Islamic threat to the West. The Muslim Brothers “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — Mohamed Akram, “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” May 22, 1991
And as for "indirectly" fostering mass murder, it is noteworthy that none of the quotes of me by this Norwegian psychopath contain any call to violence whatsoever, and Scott Shane can't come up with anything in that line, either. It is tough to make a consistent defense of the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people out to be incitement and hate, and Shane and his Islamic supremacist allies can most effectively do so by quoting me as little as possible.
Mr. Spencer wrote on his Web site, jihadwatch.org, that “the blame game” had begun, “as if killing a lot of children aids the defense against the global jihad and Islamic supremacism, or has anything remotely to do with anything we have ever advocated.” He did not mention Mr. Breivik’s voluminous quotations from his writings....
I have now. But in any case, the psychopath also praised Obama and plagiarized the Unabomber. Yet no one is holding the president or radical environmentalists responsible for the murders.
Marc Sageman, a former C.I.A. officer and a consultant on terrorism, said it would be unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik’s violence to the writers who helped shape his world view. But at the same time, he said the counterjihad writers do argue that the fundamentalist Salafi branch of Islam “is the infrastructure from which Al Qaeda emerged. Well, they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged.”
Sageman says it would be unfair to blame me, and then he does it. This is the same kind of rigorous and insightful analysis that this "expert" displayed when he explained jihad activity as a result of boredom.
“This rhetoric,” he added, “is not cost-free.”
This kind of analysis can be turned every which way. If I am murdered after all this demonization of me, will Shane or Sageman or the SPLC or Michael Isikoff be responsible?
"The devil can cite scripture for his purpose".
Shakespeare.
The fact that someone has quoted you, Mr Spencer, in a way that you did not intend, and to justify his own evil actions, places no blame whatsoever on you.
There may be many newcomers here who, in light of the recent bombing and shooting spree in Norway, have come to Jihad Watch to learn about who Robert Spencer is.
I have followed Jihad Watch for years. I have read all of Robert's books. I have watched all of his debates online... I have never ever read or seen anything from Robert which could have been twisted to endorse or advocate the kind of senseless murder we saw in Norway.
Robert is a passionate, kind-natured, and articulate defender of human, individual, and women's rights and human freedoms... He is a strong advocate of freedom of speech and of expression. He is someone who cares deeply about others and who has a profound respect for human life and human dignity.
Those who would attempt to vilify or demonize Robert for having some part in this senseless killing spree are making a false and extraordinarily lazy moral equivalency.
Let us please attempt to have some perspective.
Do not let these senseless attacks by Anders Breivik, who is clearly a sick psychopath individual, blind you to the truth.
Radical Islam (not all Muslims, obviously) is an ideology of hatred, misogyny, and bigotry, and has been the number 1 purveyor of worldwide human rights abuses in the last 10 years.
In fact, lest we forget... there have been at least 17,500 individual acts of terror since 9/11:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Some estimates put the number of victims in the hundreds of thousands. In the past five years, according to the documentary film "Killing in the name" (nominated for an academy award last year), over 88,000 people have been killed by Islamic extremists in the last 5 years alone:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1684897/
While the Norway attack was horrific, and tragic, and despicable... (and immediately denounced by virtually everyone on "the hard right" including Robert Spencer) it simply does not hold a candle to to the kind of violence, and hatred, and misogyny that we have seen by radical Islamists since 9/11.
And Robert, I think I speak for many here when I say that we stand behind you, we are grateful for your sacrifice and your commitment to truth, and we thank you for being who you are: A strong, determined defender of human rights, and a true American patriot.
Spencer, in order to blow this over you must take on the heart of the liberal establishment and hold your own.
For starters, you should try booking Bill Maher.
And then, the king of the liberal establishment.... Jon Stewart. In a lengthy interview with him I think you could enlighten him and also address your critics in a very effective manner.
Please think about what I said. If not JS, at least go with Bill Maher since .
Here's my graphic in support of Robert against the Scumedia http://bit.ly/rpGqfe
Many JW readers are fond of citing the difference in numbers between Moslem and Christian (or non-Moslem in general) terror attacks, noting the 17500 or so Moslem attacks listed on the RoP website versus 2 -- OKC and Norway -- for the Christians.
But let's be fair; the non-Moslems have racked up a lot more than just 2. The FBI report on terrorism from 1980 thru 2005 lists 318 attacks in the U.S. alone in that period, of which only 6% (19 attacks) were made by Moslems. Does it really matter that the 299 non-M attacks killed only about 200 people total (the OKC bombing accounted for the bulk of these), while the 19 M attacks killed over 3000? The FBI doesn't think so.
Does it matter that ecological terrorists and animal-rights activists made up the second-largest source of these attacks? That these attacks consisted of raids on logging company motor pools to sabotage machinery, and raids on mink ranches to set free the mink, with no fatalties? The FBI doesn't think so: it counts each mink-ranch raid as one incident, the statistical equal of 9-11, which was considered just one incident in the report.
Perhaps it is time the New York Slimes was pronounced guilty for Stalin's pogroms and the Holocaust through their worship of Stalin and Hitler.
No doubt they would have convicted Winston Churchill of causing World War Two by his campaign of Naziphobia.
We should also point out that Spencer has consistently condemned the burning of Korans and has urged people to read the Koran instead, to inform themselves about Islam.
Robert Spencer is a twisted,racist, manipulative modern-day Nazi who eventually wants the total extermination of men, women, and children for no other reason than being a muslim.
See www.spencerwatch.com
Playing the race card again are we? http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/muslims-playing-race-card-islam-is-not.html
...(This kind of analysis can be turned every which way. If I am murdered after all this demonization of me, will Sageman or the SPLC or Michael Isikoff be responsible?)
The Muslim Brotherhood and their non-scholar cohorts in American main stream media, of course, know better today that it is already too late for them to physically attack you.
Their cat of ignorance is already too far away from their bag. Your education and moral support of many reasonable thinkers and academicians have served the World.
All dogmatic slaves of cultic religions are now - rather than looking-forward to harm you - frantically, disgracefully and retarded-ly fighting to cover or covert all dangerous collations of their Koran.
Their Enemy #1 is not you – they should know, or maybe have known - but your academic excellence –hence the ideology of “Boko Haram”
Your enemy and Free peoples enemy #1 are not these gullible followers of the book called Muslims. But the book, considering so many intoxicative chapters contained there-by.
Your rant does not give even *one* example to support your bizarre claim.
JW is an educational website dedicated to making people aware of Islam's agenda of mandating Muslims the world over to 'fight until all religion is for Allah'. Islam provides daily examples of this activity. JW records them.
That's not hate speech, it's not prejudice, it's simply revealing Islam's real agenda.
You're a clown!
"Marc Sageman, a former C.I.A. officer and a consultant on terrorism, said it would be unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik’s violence to the writers who helped shape his world view. But at the same time, he said the counterjihad writers do argue that the fundamentalist Salafi branch of Islam “is the infrastructure from which Al Qaeda emerged. Well, they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged.”
In both cases Islam provides the ideological infrastructure for violent and non-violent tactics and nutcase crusaders like Breivik act upon it as well by terrorising left-affilated Norwegian people, whose politics historically let Islamists into Europe. Robert Spencer has nothing to do with this even if quoted by Breivik - there doesn't exist ideology invented by Spencer and counter-jihad isn't an ideology or religion, it's common sense of Westerners and their self-defence. There is no infrastructure here apart from blogging and activism within the rule of law. Robert Spencer's work is simply one of the best sources in research on Islam. Even if politically correct terrorism analyst like M. Sageman think otherwise (Sageman is actually not that popular in the field of terrorism studies - he talked about 'bunches of guys' who kill because of their alleged misinterpretation of Islam [Leaderless Jihad])
Breivik created his own vision of man-dominated, totalitarian Norway and he despises democracy.
Best
Luke Ahead
Norwegian socialists cheered at 9/11
They can cry me a river now!!!
Live by the sword, die by the sword!
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper002.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper006.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper005.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper007.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper008.jpg
http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f10/84181d1250186436-rare-9-11-jumpers-splatter-scene-9_11_jumpers4.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack14.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack20.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack15.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack19.jpg
In German news now, the Islam-loving Leftists are in full march, exploiting this incident, trying so deceitfully to limit freedom of speech, in criticizing Islam. The evil Nazis are back in increasingly full force just like when Islam-loving Socialist Hitler first got into power - by targeting freedom of speech first! However, a Norwegian expert from Norwegian Institute of International Affairs - is brave enough to challenge ruling Islam-loving Labour-Socialist Govt of Norway, to take responsibility for being UNDEMOCRATIC when not listening to many ordinary frustrated Norwegians by allowing massive foreign migration (for the votes - of course; that's how they stay in power)!
At - http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2011/07/norway-it-was-attack-against-labour.html
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Norway: "It was an attack against the Labour Party"
See short video.
Even LBJ once complained about " the commies at the New York Times ".
And everyone knows how this works.
Spencer is a nuisance to the left. He happens to tell the truth, in a way that they can't refute.
So smear and run, whenever opportunity presents itself.
And no matter that Shanes " article ", appears to be written on the level of a junior high school newspaper.
People will fall for it - hook, line and sinker.
Goebbels would be proud, of comrade Shanes work.
Norwegian socialists cheered at 9/11
They can cry me a river now!!!
Live by the sword, die by the sword!
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper002.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper006.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper005.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper007.jpg
http://sageauthoring.com/images/WTC/911/Jumpers/wtc_jumper008.jpg
http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f10/84181d1250186436-rare-9-11-jumpers-splatter-scene-9_11_jumpers4.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack14.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack20.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack15.jpg
http://www.rimcountry.com/images/wtc/attack19.jpg
How unjust it is to write an article that gives creedence to a falsehood that crimes like this are caused by books, articles, movies and the like. In this case, Robert and Jihad Watch.
Pretty soon they'll be using this as a defence strategy in criminal court. Shame on this guy Scott Shame, of the NY Times.
This comes as no surprise. Mainstream media outlets and politicians across the West are attempting to use the Breivik case as a pretext for shutting down criticism of Islamisation. Witness the hostile interviewing of the English Defence League's Stephen Lennon/Tommy Robinson on Newsnight yesterday evening: http://durotrigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/stephen-lennons-latest-newsnight.html
He acquitted himself pretty well, rebutting the baseless accusations that the EDL was in any way linked to Breivik.
Is the Breivik case the multiculturalists' equivalent of the Reichstag fire? There do seem to be certain similarities. Enter Brevik as Van der Lubbe!
The events in Norway powerfully speak to the power of ideas and how they inspire action.
I was quite taken by the poignancy of Mr. Spencer's opening paragraph which included...
I said: "I would like nothing better than a flowering, a renaissance, in the Muslim world, including full equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies: freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, equal employment opportunities, etc." Is all that "anti-Muslim"? My correspondent thought so. He responded: "So, you would like to see us ditch much of our religion and, thereby, become non-Muslims."
This seems to speak to heart of our challenges today, of great attachment to traditional beliefs and practices and an inability for people on all sides of this discussion to find a way to "get past stuck". It will take much work but I like Mr. Spencer's vision and find it quite compelling and attractive.
God willing may it be so.
Bible(1John2:22) defines Antichrist as the one that denies the Father and the Son; allah,islam,mohammad and muslims deny and condemn the belief in the Father and the Son.
Islam is an arab supremacist,antichrist,evil,satanic ideology that divides humanity into muslims and non-muslims and calls non-muslims infidels and teaches muslims nothing but hate and violence against non-muslims.
It is true that millions of muslims are not violent but that does not mean that islam does not teaches muslims violence just as millions of muslims do not pray daily five prayers does not mean that islam does not teach muslims to pray daily five prayers.
Robert and others like him are doing a great service to humanity by exposing the true evil nature of islam/muslims.
You, Jew-hating leftie or Muslim fanatic - are the most evil human beings ever existed on earth!
A dissident’s point of view.
Like the pacifists of Gandhi where Hitler's vanguard,
so are Norway's socialists...Mohamed's vanguard!
The Islam-loving Socialist Left is equally evil to the Muslim fanatics/Islam - and I will keep on saying that (don't ever forget, Hitler was an Islam-loving Socialist no matter how much the Left wants us to forget that)! They don't mind bombing Jewish children, just to please Islam and their savage Muslim comrades! See - http://europenews.dk/en/node/41655
NORWAY: SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY TO VOTE ON MOTION CALLING FOR BOMBING ISRAEL IF IT ACTS AGAINST HAMAS IN GAZA
Tundra Tabloids 29 March 2011
It’s come to this. The junior partner in the Norwegian government, the Socialist Left Party of Kristin Halvorsen, (Sosialistisk Venstreparti), plans to vote on a measure calling for military action against Israel if it decides to act against the Hamas in Gaza. Norway, Israel and the Jews blog informs the Tundra Tabloids of the following:Socialistic Left dubious moral tradeoff for bombing Libya: Use armed force against Israel.....
"Robert Spencer is a twisted,racist, manipulative modern-day Nazi who eventually wants the total extermination of men, women, and children for no other reason than being a muslim."
Honest Ibe Hooper...is that you?....
You are trying to lure posters into virus paradise you fraud...I went to that site, Spencerwatch, once in the past and was immediately attacked through type pad manipulations...
Everyone avoid that site...You should also be careful about loonwatch, or any link a Mahoundian or sympathizer offers...
I would like to meet that guy Scott and shake his hand...vigorously...and give him lots and lots of pats on the back...vigorously...He's very deserving...
Chechar, I followed your link. The writer there is pro-Nazi; and I believe that the Nazis were a band of thugs working to overturn Christianity, rule of law, political and civil liberty, and everything else that made the West great.
That "dissident" hails the slaughter of those poor teens as killing off "the next generation .of traitors". Well, I say give them a chance to find a better way; for surely many of them might have had they lived. Where would so many of us be without the insights that ex-socialists brought to conservatism? The prophet Ezekiel said that the children should not die for the fathers' sins nor the fathers' for the childrens', and since I wholeheartedly believe that Ezekiel wrote under the inspiration of God the holy Spirit, I'll stand with him rather than an admirer of a maniacal Austrian paper-hanger.
I am also a "dissident" against the PeeCee/EmCee machine which is in fact anti-cultural rather than "multi-cultural" (given the pervasive ignorance in its ranks). But as long as we have legal redress and the opportunity to organize politically, we should save our guns for deer season.
By all means, let's expose these creeps in high places, refute them, peaceably assemble against travesties like the Jihadi victory mosque in lower Manhattan, vote, go to law school, publish alternative media, and fight for our First Amendment Rights. But those socialist kids in Norway were not Amorites and Canaanites whose sins were full; and Breivik was not Joshua the son of Nun carrying out God's command.
Kepha, I have followed Chechar's posts and checked out his "information" links. He posted similar things the other day, and I followed up with comments on the link's Nazi and anti-Semitic content.
Chechar, it seems, is a neo-Nazi troll.
I recommend that Robert and Marisol look into this matter since his links could create a false image of what this site is about.
Robert, "chazak ve-amats" (be strong and strengthen yourself); keep your eyes open and be strong.
The type of libel and innuendo promulgated by the likes of the NY Slimes I feel is only going to worsen.
Thank you and your colleagues for keeping people informed and for remaining honest and a humanitarian.
@swami
I concur, I picked up a massive virus at one of those sites. I avoid them like the plague now.
This manufactured attack on Robert Spencer by the NYT is to be expected. The ignorant always try to kill their truth tellers. It's convenient for them to tell and believe lies.
Stand firm Robert, we know you are not guilty of these smears.
The New York Times' critical examination of the dogmas of Islam in relation to the jihadi attacks after 9/11 has been amazing.
By its glaring non-existence.
But The NYT's slandering of those who would dare to examine the terroristic tenets of the mass-murdering warlord Mohammad and his playbook of global domination (AKA "The Koran") is tediously predictable tripe.
Robert: Sue them!!!
My very modest contribution towards your legal fees is on its way from Australia right now via the David Horowitz Freedom Centre. I hope many will do the same. You do so much for us and our freedom, perhaps it's time we put some of our money where our defenders are!
Mr. Spencer: I devote considerable space to demonizing the New York Times in my Family Security Matters column, “MSM Thuggees Run Amok Over Breivik,” and how it demonizes you and Pamela Geller and other authorities on Islam. We are all “Gunga Din.” I also name Steve Emerson, David Horowitz, Daniel Pipes, Raymond Ibrahim, and but for space reasons could have named a dozen more. This column is also on Rule of Reason, Capitalism Magazine, and The Dougout.
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10031/pub_detail.asp
"Is the Breivik case the multiculturalists' equivalent of the Reichstag fire?"
Very good question, Durotrigan. Time will tell. Although a huge amount of damage has been done to the anti-Jihad movement, especially to such leaders as Geert Wilders, and Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, all is not lost. For one thing, every one of the Leftist spewers of hate who rushed to blame the reporters of Islamic violence for the actions of the Norwegian shooter is now indelibly on record. This will be handy in the future if things get to the point where the question of the day becomes "who lost the West."
Although not normally given to conspiracy theories, the entire affair is so completely laden with Leftist caricatures of conservatives, Christians, nationalists, and anti-Jihadists as to make one wonder if the operation wasn't, in fact, planned and carried out specifically to delegitimatize these movements.
Like you said, the equivalent of a Reichstag fire.
It's the NY Times - did we expect anything less...?!
Like others, I checked out the link you provided. I read the articles and comments, and also followed some of the links at the site; it was a trip into the land of neo-Nazis and White Nationalists.
Nice try, but you will get no traction here with this kind of stuff, Chechar.
A toast to you Kepha, I think you took the words right out of everyone's mouth.
One thing I will add to your thoughts, if you don't mind.
The article to which Chechar pointed us ended:
Anders Behring Breivik walked the walk you only talk
Chechar, none of us at Jihad Watch would ever take that walk. There is no darker path that one can take than the one that leads to the destruction of innocence. I wish there was a punishment appropriate for what Breivik did but there isn't. As one of the characters in J.R.R. Tolkein's 'The Lord of the Rings' expressed it: "There is no curse in Elvish, Entish or the tongues of Men bad enough for such treachery
Mr. Rome also said in his article:"As much we may like to see ourselves as contemporary Voltaires, Thomas Paines and Martin Luthers". Well, none of us may be; but, maybe one of those murdered kids might have been, had fate given them the chance. Who knows what the world lost due to this monster's abominable act.
Leviticus 19:18 "Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but love thy neighbour as thyself; I am the Lord."
Damn straight that Anders Breivik wasn't a Christian or a Jihad Watcher. Damn straight that Jihad Watchers believe in Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Chechar wrote:
A dissident’s point of view.
.............................
That's not how I'd phrase it. Kepha, Mike Ryan, Eastview, and PETER SHEARER have your number—*as do I*.
As for your grotesque assertion that mass-murderer Anders Breivik "walked the walk", are you aware that part of his plan was working with Jihadists in order to kill his fellow Europeans?
"Norway Killer Breivik Willing to Work with Al-Qaeda, Iran, Says Templars May Need to Kill Children and Cut Off Own Penis"
http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/186202/20110725/norway-killer-breivik-willing-to-work-with-al-qaeda-iran-says-templars-must-kill-children-and-cut-of.htm
This man is no hero. He is one sick bastard. You'll have to peddle your filth somewhere else.
As Peter said, "Chechar, none of us at Jihad Watch would ever take that walk."
Hear, hear!
Also in response to Shane's (NYT's) false and misleading claim re "64" "quotes" of Spencer...perhaps Shane didn't want to tell us how many times Breivik mentioned or cited (or quoted others who mentioned or cited) media, cultural Marxism, etc., in the document. (I include the results of some word searches of the document, in part to show the results of the Scott Shane-/ NYTimes-type of superficial analysis):
New York Times = 7 times
Aftenposten = 45
Dagbladet = 18
VG (Verdens Gang) = approx 16
BBC = 21
Daily Mail = 2
Telegraph = 27
CNN = 7
CBS = 1
NBC = 1
media (as a whole word) = 440
MSM = 34
journalist(s)/ism = 148
propaganda = 93
multicultural/ist/ism = 1164
Marx/ism/ist = 1132
EUSSR = 81
elite(s) = 243
left/ist(s)/ism (i.e., political) mentioned about a couple hundred times
Most of the mainstream media are mentioned negatively in discussion. Otherwise, Breivik and others are citing them for reports.
addendum to my post immediately above:
Political correct(ness) = 150 times
Politically correct = 54
“pc” in this sense: several instances
Islam = 1471