Raymond Ibrahim: New Saudi Fatwa Defends Pedophilia as ‘Marriage’

Muslim “child-marriage” — euphemism for pedophilia — is making headlines again, at least in Arabic media: Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, just issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for marriage, and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.”

Appearing in Saudi papers on July 13, the fatwa complains that “Uninformed interference with Sharia rulings by the press and journalists is on the increase, posing dire consequences to society, including their interference with the question of marriage to small girls who have not reached maturity, and their demand that a minimum age be set for girls to marry.”

Fawzan insists that nowhere does Sharia set an age limit for marrying girls: like countless Muslim scholars before him, he relies on Koran 65:4, which discusses marriage to females who have not yet begun menstruating (i.e., are prepubescent) and the fact that Muhammad, Islam’s role model, married Aisha when she was 6 years old, “consummating” the marriage — or, in modern parlance, raping her — when she was 9.

The point of the Saudi fatwa, however, is not that girls as young as 9 can have sex, based on Muhammad’s example, but rather that there is no age limit whatsoever; the only question open to consideration is whether the girl is physically capable of handling her husband/rapist. Fawzan documents this point by quoting Ibn Batal’s authoritative exegesis of Sahih Bukhari:

The ulema [Islam’s interpreters] have agreed that it is permissible for fathers to marry off their small daughters, even if they are in the cradle. But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men. And their capability in this regard varies based on their nature and capacity. Aisha was 6 when she married the prophet, but he had sex with her when she was 9 [i.e., when she was deemed capable].

Fawzan concludes his fatwa with a warning: “It behooves those who call for setting a minimum age for marriage to fear Allah and not contradict his Sharia, or try to legislate things Allah did not permit. For laws are Allah’s province; and legislation is his excusive right, to be shared by none other. And among these are the rules governing marriage.”

Fawzan, of course, is not the first to insist on the legitimacy of pedophilia in Islam. Even the former grand mufti of Saudi Arabia supported “child-marriage,” since “the Koran and Sunna document it.”

Nor is this just some theoretical, theological point; the lives of many young girls are being destroyed because of this ruling. Recall, for instance, the 13-year-old girl who died while her much older husband was copulating with her (it was later revealed that, due to her reluctance, he was tying her up and “raping” her — as if there were another way to describe sex with children); or the 12-year-old who died giving birth to a stillborn; or the 10-year-old who made headlines by hiding out from her 80-year-old “husband.”

Then there are the countless anonymous girls who do nothing to warrant any media attention — such as die — and have learned to live with their elderly husbands pawing at them, like, no doubt, the girl who married Islam’s most popular cleric, Yusuf Qaradawi, when she was 14.

What do we make of the fact that it is always Islam’s religious, authoritative voices — not aberrant voices, not “terrorists,” “extremists,” or any other euphemism coined for the occasion — that are constantly demonstrating Sharia’s savageries? Weeks before this fatwa, a female politician and activist in Kuwait called for institutionalizing sex-slavery (recommending that Muslims buy and sell female Russian captives from the Chechnya war); a popular Egyptian preacher not only said the same thing, but added that the solution to Islam’s poverty is to go on jihad and plunder the lives and possessions of infidels.

Sounds odd? Perhaps; but it is perfectly consistent. After all, distilled and in the eyes of the non-believer, Sharia law is nothing less than a legal system built atop the words and deeds of a 7th century Arab, whose behavior — from pedophilia and sex-slavery to war mongering and plundering — was very much that of a 7th century Arab. Having enticed or enslaved his contemporaries into following him, his teachings continue to entice and enslave their descendants; and, now as then, it is always the innocent who suffer.

| 40 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

40 Comments

| Leave a comment

The ulema [Islam’s interpreters] have agreed that it is permissible for fathers to marry off their small daughters, even if they are in the cradle. But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men.

While I must admit that this latest fatwa holds innovation, what I don't see is any of that good Moslem entrepreneurialism Prez Barack Hussein was talking about.

The missing innovation is that there must be a way to suspend the Moslem Male such that he wouldn't crush or frighten the child. And I'm not talking braces and trusses or block and tackle here. Bring in NASA and let's get down on some seriously new technology innovation to expand the envelope. Push the envelope. Push!

Mohammed may have waited until Ayesha was nine until he had full intercourse, but for three years before that he had been placing his penis between her thighs and rubbing until he achieved orgasm. He then made little Ayesha clean the semen up: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/mufa-khathat-cleaning-mess-up.html

Anywhere in the West that Muslims settle in large enough numbers to form a closed criminal community, infidel children are abducted, gang-raped and sometimes murdered extremely gruesomely: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/02/sexual-jihad-demoralising-and.html

The horror that is Islam seems never to stop. Do these religious leaders have any shame? Apparently not. Its ok to have sex with children. A little short of cash? Go on jihad and get yourself a Christian girl you can have sex with. The world stands silent while not only does this behavior go on but it openly goes on, with the approval of Islam's best scholars. Where are the child advocates, the woman's movement, the religious community? This Evil must be stopped. To say the Koran is a good book is to approve Evil. To work for the spread of Sharia is one of the great disgraces in this thing called Islam. Mohammed as a prophet and example of the perfect man is shame and total rejection of good and just. The darkest desires that form in the mind of man find their expression in Islam. How dreadful...

But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men.

I wonder who decides whether the weight of rapist is capable of being borne by the child. Probably the child .... right?
Ah, Allah is kind, Allah is merciful! :))

These immoral imbeciles would justify any criminal act that Mo/allah tells them to do by any crooked logic. They have such warped mind that they praise such acts, just like the marriage of six year old child Aisha to a 53 year old dirty old pedophile Mo/allah. Let's ask them if they love and praise this act much, would they marry their six year old daughter to a dirty old "imam", their religious leader. Just as I guessed - they will say "NO". Then again I may be wrong and they will marry off their daughter to a dirty old man - after all, it is sanctioned by Mo/allah!!


Are these people worthy of living with human beings???

What an icky tribe.

Well-written, as always, Raymond.

>"Bring in NASA and let's get down on some seriously new technology innovation to expand the envelope. Push the envelope. Push!"

Hey APF, may be that's why BHO ordered NASA to reach out to Muslim world. LOL....

Ronald, our "human rights" community is too busy standing up for Muslim group rights.

this is really sickining. why dont the human rights people speak up against this?
m

Aisha was 6 when she married the prophet, but he had sex with her when she was 9 [i.e., when she was deemed capable].

More likely; when he could no longer control his urges.

" would they marry their six year old daughter to a dirty old "imam", their religious leader. Just as I guessed - they will say "NO"."

I asked a revert, American, of the two hundred pound variety who married and converted for a cab driver with no education, if she would marry her young bastard (had a 6 year old kid out of wedlock before moving to "shangrila") off to a 54 year old.

Her answer: "yes, if it was 'the prophet"

It took all of my self control, I literally bit my tongue, to keep from choking the living crap out of that vile behemoth.

RWC, excellent post,

"Where are the child advocates, the woman's movement, the religious community? This Evil must be stopped. To say the Koran is a good book is to approve Evil. To work for the spread of Sharia is one of the great disgraces in this thing called Islam. Mohammed as a prophet and example of the perfect man is shame and total rejection of good and just. The darkest desires that form in the mind of man find their expression in Islam."

Where are they,indeed, worrying about removing fat (PC-weight challenged) youngsters, from perfectly reasonable parents/homes, maybe punishing parents for letting children become fat, and placing those children in psy-op hell, so they can have serious issues emotionally, for the rest of their lives, starting with the serious issue of abandonment, and God knows leading to where else, for even worse issues! Reminds of some nazi programs, and other nightmare programs. And some sick M.D.s actually recently made such recommendation to the leftards. Where in the hell is this world going? How do the decent grounded people get the hellish crazyness to cease?

And aside from the sick, disturbed, and absent intelligence and empathy that the mislamics display, as a totally alien ideology of pure, full, evil, on earth, regarding development, sexual disturbance of children, kindness, love, security, how too does one imagine backpacking IEDs on 8 year olds, remote controlled to vaporize their own, let alone any children? The nazis didn't even do that, and they were virtually as evil as is islam.

But there exists no excuse to permit any such ideology to exist any longer on this earth. The good must find that apparently difficult way, to exterminate, eradicate, and remove, forever, such evil, or anything close.

When actually exposed to the depths of the sick evil islam, most (not likewise sick) individuals realize the enormity, but the appalling apathy of the Western public's refusal to face up to reality, is unacceptable.

A campaign of public exposure should be launched, to expose the truth. At the least, somehow.

Well even if these prepubescent little 'jewels' are unable to provide the same level of 'satisfaction' as their older counter parts, at least the grizzled 70 yr old, desert-sheiks can still find pleasure in their Allah sanctioned charges from such diversions as 'thighing'. SAVAGES!

On the issue of succession (calipha), Aisha played a big role. In fact, it was the first caliph - abu-Bakr - who gave his prebuscent daughter to the false-prophet. Although abu-Bakr expanded muslim aggression - without wild goose chases like the "tabak" folly - military leaders were more deserving of succession. Of the 4 "rightly guided caliphs" (rashdoonis; educated by the false-prophet), 3 were murdered.

The fact that the caliph was delivered in exchange for pedophilic interest, attests to the utter perversity of islam, and the degeneracy of muslims. Islam is a disease, and muslims are its carriers.

The second part of my question was: "Then again I may be wrong and they will marry off their daughter to a dirty old man - after all, it is sanctioned by Mo/allah!!"

So you did find some delusional Muslim who was prepared to do that, albeit with a caveat of the dirty old man being a "prophet". Islam kills brain cells of its followers and they just walk around like zombies!!

"Islam kills brain cells of its followers and they just walk around like zombies!!"

The worst part was that this was a *female* American *revert.*

mohammadans have almost no chance of joining the human race when they're born and steeped in the madness and evil of islam.

There's no excuse for reverts who leave humanity to join the madness and evil.

Yep, Sean, and that is most likely why the poor little girl's hair was falling out; from the stress and trauma of being molested by Muhammed. So sick and sad.

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

Sahih Bukhari V5 B58 #234

''But there exists no excuse to permit any such ideology to exist any longer on this earth'' Written in stone TJFREEDOMJIHAD .Let's Roll. . .

And here in Britain, there are women, educated women, professors, going on protest marches with their young daughters, against demonstrators who do not want mosques in their cities like Cambridge.

That's what Islam is about - savage Arabic Slavery and Imperialism! Only the Devil can be Mohammed's God! After all, Islam is created by the most racist Arabic PREDATORY Pedophile rapist, robber, mass murderer of the Jews and slave-owner (including sexual slaves such as young Jewish captive girls), Mohammed, in his evil goal to construct pure Arabian kingdom and Arab race, to justify all these evilness!

Okay, I never thought I go to this extent being an American, but all Islamic followers should be stopped from becoming citizens (which they really don't) and entering into free nations. I am, as well as most of you readers are, aware of the Islamic movement called "Stealth Jihad". It would take a complete idiot not to see this in it's workings and is becoming successful due to the free societies fear of Islam. Also, when there is a sop to Islamic immigration, there should be immediate deportation of those who go against the laws of the land. We, Americans as well as other free societies do not agree to child molestation, wife beatings, honor killings, etc.
What is needed in our free societies is real leaders and not wimpy ass people who pander to anti-free society ideologies.
I've been polite for too long while we are losing out precious freedoms due to a lack of REAL leadership. No more, I'll speak my mind. Where are our Winston Churchill's now? Sadly, there are all gone.

Raymond Ibrahim: New Saudi Fatwa Defends Pedophilia as ‘Marriage’

Muslim “child-marriage” — euphemism for pedophilia — is making headlines again, at least in Arabic media: Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, just issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for marriage, and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.”
................................

Kudos to Raymond Ibrahim for here calling "child-marriage" what it is—*pedophilia*.

More:

Appearing in Saudi papers on July 13, the fatwa complains that “Uninformed interference with Sharia rulings by the press and journalists is on the increase, posing dire consequences to society, including their interference with the question of marriage to small girls who have not reached maturity, and their demand that a minimum age be set for girls to marry.”
................................

The problem for the issuer of this Fatwa is that the critics are *all too well informed*. What he means is that they will not shut up.

More:

Fawzan insists that nowhere does Sharia set an age limit for marrying girls: like countless Muslim scholars before him, he relies on Koran 65:4, which discusses marriage to females who have not yet begun menstruating (i.e., are prepubescent) and the fact that Muhammad, Islam’s role model, married Aisha when she was 6 years old, “consummating” the marriage — or, in modern parlance, raping her — when she was 9.

The point of the Saudi fatwa, however, is not that girls as young as 9 can have sex, based on Muhammad’s example, but rather that there is no age limit whatsoever...
................................

God, *the horror*. Even accepting the rape of *9-year-olds* is not enough for this "good Muslim"...

More:

...the only question open to consideration is whether the girl is physically capable of handling her husband/rapist. Fawzan documents this point by quoting Ibn Batal’s authoritative exegesis of Sahih Bukhari:

The ulema [Islam’s interpreters] have agreed that it is permissible for fathers to marry off their small daughters, even if they are in the cradle. But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men...
................................

*This* is the standard for "marriage" in Islam–whether the little girl is strong enough that she will likely *survive* being raped by a full-grown man.

More:

Fawzan concludes his fatwa with a warning: “It behooves those who call for setting a minimum age for marriage to fear Allah and not contradict his Sharia, or try to legislate things Allah did not permit. For laws are Allah’s province; and legislation is his excusive right, to be shared by none other. And among these are the rules governing marriage.”
................................

Again, the *horror*...that this monster not only condones *child rape*, but *sacralizes it*—and insists that anyone trying to protect little children—one of the most basic forms of morality—is going against "God" in doing so.

This is not merely immoral—it is **the virtual inversion of morality**.

More:

What do we make of the fact that it is always Islam’s religious, authoritative voices — not aberrant voices, not “terrorists,” “extremists,” or any other euphemism coined for the occasion — that are constantly demonstrating Sharia’s savageries? Weeks before this fatwa, a female politician and activist in Kuwait called for institutionalizing sex-slavery (recommending that Muslims buy and sell female Russian captives from the Chechnya war); a popular Egyptian preacher not only said the same thing, but added that the solution to Islam’s poverty is to go on jihad and plunder the lives and possessions of infidels.
................................

Very, very important point. These are not just the views of "some Muslims"—this represents the very heart of *what Islam is*.

This is not merely immoral—it is **the virtual inversion of morality**.

By our standards, Mohammed's actions were evil. But Muslims live in a different moral universe from the rest of us, where the very definition of good and evil are determined by what Mohammed (the Perfect man) did and said. Islam aims to completely destroy the conscience and free will of the Muslim and replace it with the cloned behavior of a psychopathic megalomaniac...
http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2011/02/muslim-rapes-christian-toddler-for.html

Nonie Darwish summed up Islamic ethics pretty well when she said that if the story of the Good Samaritan were in the Koran, the thieves would have been the heroes.

LJ, that's the idea, now we just need to find an anti-soros, in other words, similar massive funding/funds. Who knows, it's happened before, for less good cause!

Oops, "less great a cause"

I have nothing to add to the apt comments about this despicable islamic perversion, one of many, but I can't help but wonder why the lurking islamic apologists and brain dead muslims aren't calling everyone at JW filthy islamophobes for publishing this story. Just because it's true is no excuse to demonize islam and muslims. Cat got their tongues? Surely some slick, mendacious muslim or bleeding heart muslim lover has an explanation for this example of pure islamic evil, like their favorite 'out of context' excuse or better yet, the tried and true equivalency argument. Where are the trolls when you need them?

Sean, those Bukhari hadiths don't say anything to indicate that what they describe happened after an incident of "thighing" poor Aisha or before the consummation of the marriage. As far as I can tell, those hadiths could have been describing events after the consummation.

It would be helpful to Islam-critics if we could provide authoritative Islamic documents testifying that Muhammad did something sexual to Aisha before she was 9, just as we do have authoritative Islamic documents testifying that the 52-year old Muhammad had sex with her when she was 9. Actually, since in accordance with the Islamic calendar she was 9 lunar years old, and a lunar year is only about 355 days long, Aisha may have been several months short of her 9th birthday when the consummation took place.

One periodically hears rumors about Muhammad "thighing" Aisha before she was 9 and before he consummated the marriage, but I haven't come across any documentation yet...Surely if such documentation existed, we'd know about it by now, because we Islam-critics would have made it infamous. It would be even more notorious than the 52 year old Muhammad consummating with a 9 year old.

And yet if it's true that Ayatollah Khomeini said that sexual pleasure from infants is ok, provided they are not physically injured, that suggests, as does the above Saudi Arabian story and other stories, that the documentation for Muhammad abusing Aisha prior to the consummation exists somewhere. It's odd that it would not have been reported by now...

Muhammad saw a 2-3 year old girl in her mother’s arms. He was so “impressed” by her that he said, “By Allah, if this girl reaches marrying age and I am still alive, I will surely marry her.”
Musnad of Ahmad bin Hanbal v. 6, p. 338
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/03/pedophile-muhammad-mahomet-le-pedophile.html

I have opined on this earlier and made it clear that I was disgusted with the canadian Corporations that now condone some Child-abuse and quasi-pedophilia acts in public because they don't want to offend one particular Religion.
Even my employer started a Policy in 2008 that forced workers to endorse and condone hamas and Child-abuse in public because they wanted to Sponsor a PC event to look go as a Corporation that was Tolerant and respected Human Rights.
But the irony is that the Human Rights they defended ends up being the same group endorsing Hmas and quasi-pedophilia,BUT...don't think it's just the Corp.s and Politicians because the Police are now afraid to enforce the Child-abuse Laws to make arrests or event stop a Pro-hamas group from endorsing Terrorism in public.
The basis for my opinion is that we can not choose what laws to enforce or obey because it makes a farce of any Laws and we should just ignore all of them.
One day all those children being abused will be adults and remember how we treated them, I hope that if I'm on a life-support machine and these kids are the Doctor's that they will see me as the adult that tried to stop the abuse.
God help the PC yahoos when the abused kids will just pull the plugs on ill people that were part of this era today,what reason would these kids have to show compassion for the same person that tossed them to the pedophiles and pervs.

To Susanp:
You have taken this out of context and I suspect you haven't read the Koran in Arabic so you have obviously misunderstood the true translation. You are an ignorant racist and Islamophobic hatemonger spreading fear, hatred and lies against all Muslims. What about Timothy McVeigh and abortion doctor killers? The Crusades were far worse than any tiny minority of discredited extremists perverting the peaceful, perfect, and final true religion for all mankind. Islam does not permit suicide and rejects terrorism of all kinds especially the cowardly terrorism of a State military against brave martyrs who have no choice but to defend themselves against murderous aggressors who occupy their homeland. (sarc off)

This is just like democrats. No one could think this stuff up. The reality is more terrible than a moral person can imagine. Liberals/communists/democrats/socialists/muslims all share the ability to have no morals and feel no guilt about their actions. As a psychologists that lived in Cairo I was astounded at how islam was a cover for every demented, debauched, immoral, criminal, disgusting deed done. Because muhamed married a 6 year old they all want to bang babies. Old moo murdered a jewish womans husband in front of her so he could bang her. Old moo liked to back door young boys so if they ain't got pubic hair go for it. To support all of this debauchery old moo just stole or enslaved those he needed to keep power.
There is no way to be muslim and have morals, guilt, humanity. They sell each other daughters so they won't be banging their own. Sick, so sick islam is.

There's the debate about "reforming" islam by saying that everything in koran should not be taken literally. This fatwa is not going to ease this discussion about "reforming islam". Now it's pinned downed that everything mo did was "real". What a sick ideology islam is!

It took all of my self control, I literally bit my tongue, to keep from choking the living crap out of that vile behemoth.

Hi Istanbul_Chick I know exactly how you felt; something similar turned by stomach.

When the Roman Polanski hearing came up recently in Switzerland; I watched as the liberal left went to his defense and tried to portray the story as if he was the victim!

Of the left, Hollywood was the most disgusting and most vocal supporter of Polanski, and of the Hollywood brigade, Whoopi Goldberg was the worst.

Below is a link to a cut from her show 'The View' where she overtly 'went to bat for Polanki', defending the indefensible.

There are lots of things worth noting in this short clip but the two important ones that pertain to this JW article are:

1) her defense that what Polanski did was okay because there are some places in the world that look at sex with a child as not rape.

2) there may be situations where she wouldn't mind if her 14 year old daughter (hypothetical) had sex with a 45 year old man. Specifically she said:

"Would I want my 14 year old daughter having sex with somebody? (meaning someone like Polanski) . . .Not necessarily."


When you look for the moral compass in Hollywood you quickly realize this segment of society doesn't have one; either on screen or off screen. Even so, I never thought I would see the day when one of these creeps would publicly argue for pedophilia.


It is clear what we are seeing here is yet another affinity between the liberal left in the West and Islam. These two philosophies have so much in common they are like-minded bed-fellows, almost literally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NX_D0Bv9M0

: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object

I find it very strange that you claim knowledge of islam and you know the history if Aisha. I know you can not be objective that is why you will keep your readers ignorant that Aisha was a scholar of Islam teaching MEN and WOMEN. She was a very strong willed WOMAN who educated her community. NOT 1 Christian or Jew ever had an issue with this type of marriage because it was not an issue in THEIR culture. It is written that Mary mother of Jesus was 12 years old when she gave birth. This was common. They did not have an issue about age with her, they had an issue because they believed she fornicated.

His only wife that was a virgin and young was Aisha. By definition you are wrong and lack knowledge of Islam.


33:21 "Surely in the Messenger of God you have a good example".
9:28 Allah say's “Verily, the unbelievers are unclean.”

You're wrong about Mary's age.

The *only* completely authoritative and canonical Christian accounts of the Incarnation and birth of the Lord Jesus are in the gospels of Matthew and Luke.

Neither writer says anything at all about what age Mary was, so you *cannot* claim that it is written that she was twelve when she gave birth. What they don't tell us, we don't know, and that's flat. (Similarly, since the gospel writers do not *say* that Joseph was an old man, there is actually no **scriptural** basis whatsoever for the mere *tradition*, among some Christians, that he was old - it's speculation, not historic fact. For all we know, he could have been quite young).

We Christians, and certainly evangelical Christians like myself, do not regard extra-biblical traditions as being on the same level as the Gospels and the rest of canonical scripture. Oh, and while we're on the subject of scripture: we certainly do not see any truth at all in the much, much later, plagiarised, bizarre and totally garbled stories that are found in your Quran and Hadith. When you accuse us and the Jews of having distorted or corrupted Scripture, you are reversing reality: it is **Islam** that has twisted and indeed defiled and degraded the *Biblical* personages and stories.

You are pretending that Mary was twelve in order to play tu quoque and whatabout; in order to try to claim that Aisha's case is the same as Mary's. Which it isn't, in any case.

I have heard this claim over and over from Mohammedans in this forum and let me tell you, it's nonsense.

the "saudi papers" link links to a trinidad and tobago website. ?

Since allah's apostle consummated his marriage on Aisha at nine and did not send her bleeding and hemmorrhaging into the 7th century equivalent of a trauma unit,It's safe to assume he had a very teeny weenie. Some physicians feel that Mo might have been afflicted with a condition called hypospadias, a defect where the urinary meatus is located under the penile shaft. If the opening is at the proximal end urine is deflected downward toward the feet. Probably why his clothes had to be washed ( think Monica Lewinski and the famous dress. )
Moreover he himself stated that he preferred very young women because " They are
satisfied with a modicum. " He was only seen by his followers once displaying full frontal
nudity and that and was from a distance. In his biography he informed his followers just
before he died that allah wanted him to take another wife, this time the lucky little lass was only five. Aisha was not a one time only desire. When you think of Mo as a guy who
couldn't stand up to pee you get a whole new view of pediphile Pete. Trust me, the Sira is a barrow of newsy notes the average imam would kill to keep secret from us prying infidels. Never thought I'd acquire such esoteric knowledge in a " sacred " book . Its racier in parts than Hustler's Forum.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter