Ibn Warraq: The Judeo-Christian Origins of Islam (Part 2)

The Judeo-Christian Origins of Islam
by Ibn Warraq
Part 2
Part 1 here

William St. Clair Tisdall [1859-1928], in his The Original Sources of the Qur’an [London, 1905], gives us several examples of the probable source of the stories in the Koran. But it must be remembered that he was, in my opinion, working from false premises, since he accepted the entire Muslim traditional fairy tale about the compilation of the Koran, Muhammad, the Hadith, and the rest of One Thousand and One Night fantasies.

Tisdall begins with Surah XIX., Maryam, 28, 29, where we are told that when Mary came to her people after the birth of our Lord, they said to her,

"O Mary, truly thou hast done a strange thing. O sister of Aaron, thy father was not
a man of wickedness, and thy mother was not rebellious."

Tisdall comments, “From these words it is evident that, in Muhammad's opinion, Mary was identical with Miriam, the sister of Moses and Aaron! This is made still more clear by Surah LVI , At Tahrim, 12, where Mary is styled "the daughter of 'Imran," the latter being the Arabic form of Amram, who in the Pentateuch is called the father of "Aaron and Moses and Miriam their sister" (Numbers. xxvi. 59). The title "sister of Aaron" is given to Miriam in Exodus xv. 20, and it must be from this passage that Muhammad borrowed the expression. The reason of the mistake which identifies the Mother of our Saviour with a woman who lived about one thousand five hundred and seventy years before His birth is evidently the fact that in Arabic both names, Mary and Miriam, are one and the same in form, Maryam. The chronological difficulty of the identification does not seem to have occurred to Muhammad. … [Muslim] commentators have in vain attempted to disprove this charge of historical inaccuracy.”

Let us now see what the Qur'an and the Traditions relate regarding the
latter.

In Surah III., Al 'Imran, 35,36 we read:—

"When 'Imran's wife said, ‘My Lord, verily I have dedicated to Thee what is in my womb, as consecrated: receive it therefore from me: verily Thou art the Hearer, the Knower.’ When therefore she bore her, she said, ‘My Lord, verily I have borne her, a female’ — and God was well aware of what she had borne, and the male is not as the female — ‘and verily I have named her Mary, and verily I commit, her and her seed unto Thee from Satan the stoned.’ Accordingly her Lord received her with fair acceptance, and He made her grow with fair growth, and Zacharias reared her. Whenever Zacharias entered the shrine unto her, he found food near her. He said, ‘O Mary, whence is this to thee?’ She said, ‘It is from God: verily God feedeth whomsoever He willeth, without a reckoning.’"

Tisdall continues, “In addition to and explanation of this narrative, Baidawi [died 1260 C.E.] and other commentators and traditionists inform us of the following particulars. ‘Imran's wife was barren and advanced in age. One day, on seeing a bird giving food to its young ones, she longed for offspring, and entreated that God would bestow on her a child. She said, ‘O my God, if Thou givest me a child, whether it be a son or a daughter, I shall offer it as a gift in Thy presence in the Temple at Jerusalem." God heard and answered her prayer, and she conceived and bore a daughter, Mary. Jalalu'ddin tells us that the name of Mary's mother was Hanna. When she brought Mary to the Temple and handed her over to the priests, they accepted the offering and appointed Zacharias to guard the child. He placed her in a room, and permitted no one but himself to enter it; but an angel supplied her with her daily food.”

Returning to the Qur'an (Surah III.,41-46), we learn that, when Mary was older,

"The angels said, ‘O Mary, verily God hath chosen thee and purified thee, and He hath chosen thee above the women of the worlds. O Mary, be devout to thy Lord, and worship, and bow with those that bow.’ That is part of the announcement of the invisible; we reveal it to thee; and thou wast not with them when they threw their reeds (to see) which of them should rear Mary: and thou wast not with them when they disagreed. When the angels said, ‘O Mary, verily God giveth thee good tidings of a Word from Himself, whose name is the Messiah, Jesus Son of Mary, illustrious in the world and in the hereafter, and from among those who draw near (to God): and He shall speak to men in the cradle and when grown up, and He is of the Just Ones,’ she said, ‘My Lord, whence shall I have a child, since no human being hath touched me?’ He said, ‘Thus God createth what He willeth: when He hath decreed a matter, then indeed He saith to it, Be! — therefore it exists.’"

Tisdall comments, “In reference to what is said in these verses about 'casting reeds' or pens, Baidawi and Jalalu'ddin state that Zacharias and twenty-six other priests were rivals to one another in their desire to be Mary's guardian. They therefore went to the bank of the Jordan and threw their reeds into the water; but all the reeds sank except that of Zacharias, and on this account the latter was appointed her guardian."

| 13 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

13 Comments

| Leave a comment

In spite of the fanciful thousand-and-one narrative embellishments in the Koran and Islamic tradition, one can still detect fragments of traditional Christian teaching, such as the tradition that Mary was raised in the temple until she was about 12 or 13 years old. The Presentation of the Theotokos (Greek for Bearer, or Birthgiver, of God) in the Temple, is one of the Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church.

This series from Ibn Warraq is a huge service, as it further reveals what a syncretistic hodgepodge the Koran is. Snippets from the gnostic gospel of Barnabas are blended with the Docetist heresy, with half-digested retellings of Old and New Testament episodes and bizarre fantasies and dreams (not to mention all the injunctions to 'smite the unbelievers')... It is for all these reasons that the eighth century church father, John of Damascus (who was raised in the Islamic culture) treated Islam as a heresy, referring to it as "the superstition of the Ishmaelites, which to this day prevails and keeps people in error."

http://orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx

I've long wondered how in the hell a devout Muslim can explain Surah 19. Mary, the mother of Jesus, is the sister of Moses and Aaron!? If the Koran is the inerrant word of God, then why this colossal mistake? Of course, other mistakes in the Koran exist as well, such as Ezra in Surah 9 being referred to as the person Jews worship as the Son of God, the Messiah, and the Christian Trinity in Surah 5 being described as composed of the Father, Mother and Son, a combination that perhaps some tiny heretical Christian sect in seventh-century Arabia adhered to but why not accurately describe what the vast majority of Christians at that time and into modern times believed about the Trinity's composition? The Koran, in addition to being turgid, repetitive, desultory and disturbing, is just plain erroneous at times.

Memo to Muslims who can still think for themselves: the Koran is not what you've been told it is. Not by a long shot. Reconsider. Everything.

Islam is hard, but very brittle. Since the Koran claims to be the absolute word of G_d, unlike the Bible which is human-mediated, it only needs ONE error, no matter how small, to smash the credibility of the entire cult of Islam and reveal Mo as a plagiarist, charlatan and conman: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/exorcising-mohammed-conman-from-minds.html

This is top class stuff! And just what's needed. Demolish the Qur'an and Islam has precisely ....... nothing! All the nonsense about jihad and senseless killing no longer has a platform to stand on.
More please!

I have the feeling this could be a long series. Ibn Warraq is just slowly getting started;-)

I just reread Luxenberg's translation of the inscription in the dome of the rock. He deviates at one point in order to prove that the quran mentions that Jesus was the messenger (Rassoul) and servant (Abd) of god. He further deviates and mentions that Sura 72, Verses 18-20 have been completely mistranslated! He shows that the quran actually mentions the resurrection of christ and that a syriac scripture was mistranslated into the arabic scripture, because a siriac letter was misinterpreted. Fascinating stuff!

The quran is just a hodge-podge of scriptures written in ancient arabic, heavily influenced by syria. Parts were translated from an older syriac scripture, the mother of the book. Later muslim interpreters of the 9th century invented all kinds of entertaining stories (hadith) in order to make sense of the quran, which they no longer understood.

I have the feeling this could be a long series. Ibn Warraq is just slowly getting started;-)
LOL!!!

One of my favourite pastimes is to read Muslim books setting out to demolish Christianity by demolishing the Christian scriptures. Fortunately I have a bit of Biblical Hebraic and New Testament Greek enabling me to enjoy the fun to the utmost, but others are not that lucky :(

I agree with you that this "Revisionism" is fascinating stuff. I have been wondering whether I should acquire Luxenberg's book on the Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran ...and whether my life is too short for it. I'll make do with secondary sources for now.

Wellington: I've long wondered how in the hell a devout Muslim can explain Surah 19. Mary, the mother of Jesus, is the sister of Moses and Aaron!?

The standard Muslim explanation is that their scriptures are correct and inerrant, while ours are corrupt. We Jews deliberately corrupted our own scriptures due to our perverse and evil natures, in order to obscure the truth. We know the truth and refuse to admit it. But there are good people among the Jews. They are the ones who become Muslims.

I'm reminded, Elderly Zionist, of the time (some thirty years ago) when I spoke to American black Muslims who were followers of the Sudanese Mahdi and his descendants. They were selling incense in a Philly subway station and had all kinds of literature on their table along with what they had up for sale.

Well, I got into a discussion with them (I could detect they barely tolerated me because I was white) and I was told by them, among other ridiculous things, that Arabic was the oldest written language on earth. When I countered by pointing out that languages such as Sumerian, Akkadian, Hebrew, Phoenician, Greek and Sanskrit were far older than any written Arabic, they asked me how I knew this. I responded by saying that any reference work, for instance the Encyclopedia Britannica, would confirm what I conveyed. Their response to this was that such works were written by white men and thus were false and in league with Satan. At that point I knew that further conversation would be useless and I bid them goodbye.

Still, to maintain that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a sister of two men who lived over a thousand years before Jesus existed, is such a stretch of the truth that only true believers could believe such nonsense, such a distortion of chronology. It is not the devout Muslim I seek first and foremost to convey this to, but rather the so-so Muslim who adheres to Islamic practices much as many other folks who honor the trappings of their respective religion do without really understanding it or being fervent about it. I also would like non-Muslims to know about egregious factual errors in the Koran, thus implanting in them a potential contempt for the standard Muslim claim that the Koran is without error.

The truth is often elusive and being easily wearied conveying it to the ignorant is an indulgence I have long thought should be fought tenaciously within oneself. Hence my query to any Muslim, which I will never stop asking, about the chronological absurdity mentioned in Surah 19.

If Islam is eventually to be assigned to the trash heap of history, as I think it eventually will be, it is imperative that the truth about the Koran, a most distubing and factually erroneous tome, be exposed for any mistakes found within it. After all, the truth is more powerful by far than falsehood. And if Islam isn't false, then nothing is.

Though not Jewish myself, I still count myself as a Zionist. Long live Israel.

Jackasses who write expositions of islam, from the understanding that Muhammad was a true "prophet," are loathsome. Karen Armstrong - who drinks wine during interviews - takes exactly that position. She has NEVER been asked why acceptance of anyone as a "prophet of god" doesn't confer belief in their religion. Christians and Jews are well aware that they are irreconciably opposed on certain core doctrines: like the "redeemer" status of Jesus of Nazareth. So be it. But, one cannot be a follower of Judaism, while denying that Old Testament prophecy of a coming "Messiah," has yet to play out. Hence, to a Jew, New Testament prophecy of the "Second Coming," cannot be accepted. Torah authority allows no discretion in that regard. Yet Karen Armstrong and the rest of the pan-dhimmis, proffer a "christian" label, while believing that the wild animal whose followers murdered hundreds of millions of real Christians, is a bona fide "prophet."

Muhammad had good reason to concoct a religion. He was humiliated because of his boy-toy status as husband to a woman 15 years his senior. As a "prophet" he claimed the right to unlimited wives - he had 13 and 9 rape-concubines. His family once had status as religious leaders, and had been tasked a building the "kaba" which was likely Copt in construction, and Hindu in religion. He lost that when he married into wealth. He had over a decade to find ways to build a power base. Most of his concocted "recitations" originated in his sick mind, and were devised to advance his revenge and booty interests.

We have too numerous to count examples of other concocted religions and sectarian cults. It is dishonest to deny that Muhammad had similar perverse motives in his creation. But he is the worst of all humanity. Even the booty (anfal) motivation can't mitigate the wholesale waste of human lives that followed his every move.

It won't sink in with dhimmis, that muslims believe that OUR Holy Scriptures are polluted with "satanic" distortion. In public they point to "errors," but they really view the Judeo-Christian-Secular culture as evil, and our lands as salients for "final jihad," until "allah alone is worshipped by mankind." That cannot impact on Karen Armstrong's brain.

11:20 AM:

Hadith records muhammad claiming to be "illiterate." That would be impossible for a man who was a long-distance Trader, and caravan operator. As arabic didn't become a written language until at least 50 years after the quran was concocted, the first quran script - 17 years after Muhammad died - could either have been in Hebrew (unlikely) or Aramic (near certain because the first calipha jihad aggressions were made against Syria). Of course, Aramic had Syric roots - Assyrians originated in what is now Iraq and shifted to the Mediterranean - and classical arabic grafted Hijaz verbiage, onto Syric stems, creating the lowbrid language. An angel supposedly spoke to Muhammad as he was confined to a cave, because of his madness, in arabic. God-logic dictates that a "prophet" would immediately record "recitations" (quran) in a written language. Islam follows the logic of a Fraud, with private motives and a callous indifference to life and liberty. Muhammad called himself "slave-of-allah" so that he could make slaves-of-muhhamad. I would apologize to Hitler for comparing him to the worst creature ever born. Islam is a disease and muslims are its carriers. And it was created in the sickets of all minds.

Wellington and ElderlyZionist:

Re the Muslim charge that the Jews and Christians changed the Scriptures, one thing the Da'wa boys never couldd explain to me was how these two non-cooperating religions end up wrangling over essentially the same book (the Hebrew canon of the Old Testament). And, having some acquaintance with both the Masoretic Hebrew text anf the Greek Septuagint, I know something of the differences between the two, and that they are not quite great enough to lend credence to Muslim charges (neither, for instance, prophesies anything about Muhammad).

As for Qur'an 19:28-29 about Maryam being the sister of Moses and Aaron, which Ib Warraq discusses, I strongly suspect that Muhammad was just naive enough to confuse the sister of Moses and Aaron with the mother of Jesus (as if there weren't dozens of Jewish and Christian Maryams all over Syria and Iraq in Muhammad's day!), and that the later Muslim insistence that "sister" just means "distant kinswoman" arose after later Muslims had a little more exposure to the Christian and Jewish populations of the Fertile Crescent.

I also suspect that a lot of Muhammad's account of Mary being raised in the temple under the care of Zacharias may be from the Protevangelium of James, an apocryphal work circulating and read in the Middle East in those days. This book is one of those supposed "Lost Books of the Bible" that cause the eyes of the unlearned to pop and their mouths to gape when mentioned on the History Channel. However, nobody quite explains why the supposedly stupid and credulous Christians didn't canonize it when it meshed so nicely with the Marian devotion that was growing in the 4th century and later.

I suppose that the picture of Muhammad that is slowly forming in my mind is that of a partly naive, partly unscrupulous, partly deluded 7th century "seeker" who drew together various strands of tradition picked up mostly orally from Jews and Christians he met on his travels without looking too deeply at where these strands of traditions came from and simply assuming that any tale he heard about any biblical figure was somehow from the Bible.

Does anyone know if Christoph Luxenberg's book has been translated into English? If so, I'd like to get it through inter-library loan.

http://www.amazon.com/Syro-Aramaic-Reading-Koran-Contribution-Decoding/dp/3899300882/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1

"who drew together various strands of tradition picked up mostly orally from Jews and Christians he met on his travels without looking too deeply"
I fear part of split between Muhammad and Jews of the day must have been caused by the - perhaps not were silent nor cautious - incredulity expressed by some Jews who were perfectly aware of the dubious origins of many of his tales. Perhaps they even laughed at him, and I think this would have been the most unwise reaction of all.

Are you a writer? Have you published any works? Your knowledge is very impressive and I was wondering where, if anywhere, you have committed other thoughts to print?

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter