August 2011 Archives

August 31, 2011

911FreedomRally.jpg


While clergy and first responders are barred from the official ceremonies, both are welcome at the 9/11 Freedom Rally. And while White House guidelines forbid official 9/11 ceremonies from mentioning who attacked the U.S. on that day or why, the 9/11 Freedom Rally features more honest speakers.

Free citizens are coming from all over the U.S. to attend the rally. “Honor our war and stand for freedom and against the deception and lies being used to subdue us,” said AFDI Executive Director Pamela Geller. “We must show the jihadists we are unbowed in the defense of freedom.”

AFDI and its Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) program are encouraging all Americans to stand against the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero and the anti-Semitic Durban III conference that will be held in New York City at the same time, and for American values on the tenth anniversary of the worst attack ever on American soil.

The confirmed list of speakers includes Speakers include 9/11 family members, including Rosaleen Tallon, sister of hero firefighter and reservist in the United States Marine Corps, Sean Tallon, who was killed in the 9/11 attacks; Sally Regenhard, mother of hero firefighter Christian Regenhard, killed in the 9/11 attacks (Regenhard is an American activist who has become one of the leading voices for the families of the victims of the September); U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton; German MP René Stadtkewitz leader of Germany’s Freedom Party; Dr. Arieh Eldad, former candidate for Prime Minister of Israel, Member of the Knesset; Ezra Levant, TV anchor, newspaper columnist, author, founding publisher of the Western Standard magazine, the only Canadian media outlet to publish the Danish cartoons of Muhammad (livestreaming on SUN TV); Alan T. DeVona, a World Trade Center Patrol Sergeant who was on duty during the 9/11 jihad attack; Anders Gravers, leader of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE); Sudanese ex-slave and freedom fighter Simon Deng; the courageous ex-Muslim human rights activist Wafa Sultan; war hero and North Carolina Congressional candidate Ilario Pantano; popular radio host Joyce Kaufman; Helen Freedman, Americans for a Safe Israel; Darla Dawald, National Director of the Patriot Action Network; James Lafferty of the Virginia Anti-Sharia Taskforce (VAST); Coptic Christian activist Joseph Nassralla; Iraqi ex-Muslim Michael Paul; and others.

Members of the clergy (banned from the official ceremonies) will be there for the invocation. And first responders, who were not invited to the official ceremonies, will speak and are welcome at 9/11 Freedom Rally.

Hosting the rally are Pamela Geller, publisher of the acclaimed AtlasShrugs.com blog, executive director of AFDI and SIOA, and author of Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books); and AFDI/SIOA associate director Robert Spencer, the bestselling author and director of Jihad Watch.

That evening, Geller and Spencer will host a special screening of the groundbreaking film, The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 911 Attacks (more here), at The Actor’s Temple Theater on 47th between 8th and 9th Avenues. RSVP to GroundZeroMosque@aol.com.

Building the Ground Zero mosque is not an issue of religious freedom, but of resisting an effort to insult the victims of 9/11 and to establish a beachhead for political Islam and Islamic supremacism in New York. Cordoba Initiative board member imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is an open proponent of Sharia, Islamic law, a system that denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law. Given the thousands of triumphal mosques that have been built on the cherished sites of conquered peoples throughout Islamic history, the mosque leaders’ claim that this mosque would be understood differently by Muslims worldwide lack foundation.

The Durban III conference follows upon two previous conferences that scapegoated and demonized the state of Israel in service of Islamic jihad and Islamic supremacist interests. The rally will defend Israel against the defamation to which it will be subjected at this conference. It will also call upon the city to remove roadblocks to the reconstruction of St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, which was destroyed on 9/11 and since then mired in bureaucratic red tape that has prevented its rebuilding – in stark contrast to the help Mayor Bloomberg and other city officials have given to the Ground Zero Mosque project.

AFDI/SIOA is one of America’s foremost organizations defending human rights, religious liberty, and the freedom of speech against Islamic supremacist intimidation and attempts to bring elements of Sharia to the United States.

Join the SIOA Facebook group here.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yikes! Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacist groups constantly tell us that there is no support for jihadists, absolutely none, among Muslims in the U.S. So how could this be? Surely Hamas-linked CAIR and the others aren't...lying, are they? And why aren't these twenty percent turning in the "extremists" to law enforcement?

Oh yeah:

DontTalkto FBI.jpgCAIR-California distributed this poster to Muslims


"One in five US Muslims knows of extremist support in community," by Jon Swaine in the Telegraph, August 31 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

One in five American Muslims knows of support for extremism in their community, new research has found, despite Muslims being far happier about the state of the US than other groups.

As the 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks approaches, 21 per cent of respondents told a study they had detected "a great deal" or "a fair deal" of support for extremism in their areas.

While the vast majority said that suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians to protect Islam were never justified, 19 per cent of respondents did not agree with this statement....

However more than half of Muslims said they felt singled out for terrorist surveillance, and 43 per cent said they had personally experienced harassment in the past year.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday evening I spent an enjoyable hour taking questions from a Qur'an study group, and the estimable Amy Peikoff recorded the whole thing for posterity. Many thanks to all who submitted questions. You can find the whole thing at Amy's blog here.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Predictably, Muslims are claiming victim status over the riot they provoked at Rye Playland yesterday. Their claims might have more credibility if they didn't always claim to be innocent victims of "Islamophobia" in any and every conflict with the filthy kuffar.

"Muslims, police scuffle at Rye Playland over amusement park’s head scarf ban; 15 arrests made," by Corinne Lestch and Bill Hutchinson for the New York Daily News, August 31 (thanks to Keith):

Rye Playland was shut down Tuesday after cops scuffled with Muslims upset that women wearing head scarves were barred from the rides, witnesses said.

Fifteen people, including three women, were charged with disorderly conduct and assault in the chaos, authorities said.

The Westchester County park was packed with Muslims celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr - the holiday marking the end of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

One woman, Entisai Ali, began arguing with cops over the amusement park's head scarf, or hijab, rule, said Dena Meawad, 18, of Bay Ridge, Brooklyn.

The ban, which is not Muslim specific, was imposed about 3 years ago mostly to prevent hats from falling onto the tracks of roller coasters and other rides, park officials said.

"The cops started getting loud with her and she started getting loud, too. They pushed her on the ground and arrested her," Meawad said.

Her cousin, Kareem Meawad, 17, went to try to protect the woman and was beaten by cops and also arrested, she added. Her brother, Issam Meawad, 20, was pushed to the ground and taken into custody when he tried to help his cousin, she said.

"She just wanted to get on a ride. That was it," Dena Meawad said of the initial confrontation. "It's clear, this all happened because we're Muslim."

John Hodges, chief inspector of Westchester County Public Safety, insisted that police did not use excessive force.

He said up to 100 cops from surrounding departments converged on the park.

Two park rangers were injured in the melee, prompting felony assault charges against two people arrested, officials said.

The ugly incident happened just after 1 p.m. The event was organized by the Muslim American Society of New York, and attracted 3,000 Muslims from Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx and Westchester County.

Ali's sister, Ayman Alrabah, 24, of Brooklyn said her husband, brother and father were all tackled by cops and put into handcuffs when they tried to help her sister.

Alrabah said she was unaware of the head-scarf rule until she and her sister tried to get on the park's Dragon Coasters.

"We requested a refund and all of a sudden an argument became a riot," Alrabah said. "Cops came. They were hitting my brother, my dad. My husband was on the floor and they were handcuffing him.

She said her 4-year-old son was "traumatized" by seeing his father arrested.

"They treated us like animals, like we were nothing," Alrabah said. "They came with their dogs and sticks. We came to have fun."

The park was closed for about two hours because of the fracas. It reopened at about 6 p.m.

Peter Tartaglia, deputy commissioner of Westchester County Parks, said the Muslim American Society of New York was warned in advance of the rule barring head scarves on rides for safety reasons.

"Part of our rules and regulations, which we painstakingly told them over and over again, is that certain rides you cannot wear any sort of headgear," Tartaglia said. "It's a safety issue for us on rides, it could become a projectile."

Many Muslims were given refunds as they left the park disappointed.

"In this heightened state of Islamaphobia, a woman wearing a hajib is an easy target these days," said Zead Ramadan, president of the [Hamas-linked] Council on American-Islamic Relations - New York. "Unfortunately, this turned ugly due to a lot of miscommunication."

There isn't actually any "heightened state of Islamophobia" except from the propaganda produced by Zead Ramadan's Hamas-linked CAIR and allied groups. In reality, hate crimes against Muslims are infrequent:

Anti-Jewish attacks 70% of hate crimes, anti-Muslim attacks 9% of hate crimes -- Senate to hold hearings on "anti-Muslim bigotry"

Just-released New York 2009 report: Hate crimes against Jews: 251. Hate crimes against Muslims: 11.

Backlash! Anti-Muslim hate crimes only eight percent of hate crimes, far less than those against Jews

| 63 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Father and son jihadists" in World Net Daily, August 30, Pamela Geller discusses Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Christmas underwear bomber, and his rejection of American law for Islamic law -- as well as the little-noted Sharia activities of his "moderate" father in Nigeria:

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Christmas underwear bomber, is back in the news, claiming that he is being wrongfully imprisoned and should be immediately released. [...]

A devout Muslim, Abdulmutallab intended to kill hundreds, if not thousands, of people in the cause of Islam on Christmas Day in 2009, with a bomb in his crotch. In his statement to the court, he excoriates the inferior kuffar and explains the superiority of Islamic law, Shariah: "The defendant is being unjustly detained in the United States of America, and subjected to the Rule of Man," wrote Abdulmutallab, insisting that he should "only be judged and ruled by the law of the Quran." [...]

The devout Muslim bomber also claimed that during the "holy month of Ramadan," "excessive force" was used against him after he assaulted several officers "in defense of Muhammad." I wouldn't be surprised if Hamas-tied CAIR files charges against law enforcement for using "excessive force" to restrain this deeply pious man. [...]

The devout Muslim bomber was from a well-to-do banking family, so when the leftist media lapdogs try to foist that poverty meme on you, spit in their repulsive faces. In reality, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was from a privileged background. His father, Dr. Alhaji Umaru Abdul Mutallab, was until recently the head of the oldest and largest bank in Nigeria, the First Bank of Nigeria PLC, and had been a government minister during the 1970s.

There were reports throughout the mainstream media saying that Abdulmutallab's father warned U.S. authorities in Nigeria about his son. But now that his son is in court, his father needs to be properly scrutinized also, to unravel the truth about where and how Abdulmutallab was "radicalized."

In 2005, Alhaji Mutallab hired Mallam Lamido Sanusi Lamido as the head of his risk management department. Lamido served in that position for several years. Then in June 2009, Alhaji Mutallab recommended that the then-president of Nigeria, Umaru Musa Yar'Adua, appointed Lamido as governor of the Nigeria Central Bank, an institution that is similar to the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England. Lamido still holds that job. [...]

Lamido decided this year to transform the Nigerian banking system to Shariah banking, under the guise of "non-interest banking," which he claimed is a very effective system in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Indonesia and Iran.

This new banking system is slated to begin this year; and coincidentally, Alhaji Mutallab was the first Nigerian to obtain the required Shariah banking license. A report in Africa Today last January alleged that Alhaji Mutallab had "ties to Muslim Wahhabism extremism in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Dubai, Yemen, Egypt."...

Read it all.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This suicide attacker must have been reading Islamophobic literature misrepresenting his peaceful religion.

Sunni/Shi'ite Jihad Update. "Suicide bombing near Pakistani mosque kills 11," from Deutsche Presse Agentur, August 31 (thanks to Twostellas):

Islamabad - A car suicide bombing on Wednesday killed at least 11 people and injured 21 in south-west Pakistan, police said.

The attack took place in the parking lot of a mosque when hundreds of Shia Muslims were leaving after Eid al Fitr prayers for the end of Ramadan in Quetta, the capital of Balochistan province.

'The attacker wanted to ram the explosive-laden car into Eid Gah (the mosque) but the explosion occurred in the parking lot,' city police chief Ahsan Mehboob said, adding that due to 'tight security' around the mosque the attacker could not get beyond the car park....

Hundreds of people have died in the clashes between minority Shia and majority Sunni Muslims across Pakistan in recent years.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Abu Zar, who has dedicated his life to the study of Islam, somehow succumbs to Islamophobia misrepresentations of his peaceful religion, and calls on Pakistanis in mosques and madrassas not to wage interior spiritual jihad, but armed jihad against the Pakistani government. How very strange. How did greasy Islamophobes get so much influence over Abu Zar and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan?

"Uzbekistan al-Qaida Affiliate Pushes Attacks Against Pakistan," from IPT News, August 30 (thanks to Benedict):

The Mufti of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan [IMZ], a central Asian affiliate of al-Qaida, has called on Pakistani scholars to declare war on the nation's government. In published remarks to Pakistani scholars, the Mufti highlighted how suicide teenage bombers had empowered the movement but the militant scholars had yet to join the fight.

"Our small brothers and youth, his age is 16 … 15 years, he wraps his body and chest with this powder and blows himself up against the malignant cursed Pakistani army. So why don't you Ulema [scholars] speak," asked Abu Zar, Mufti of the Islamic Movement, in his meeting with a group of Pakistani scholars. "Five years ago we began this jihad, so O' Ulema we ask Allah that you be with us, be with the truthful."

According to Abu Zar, the Pakistani and Afghani jihads are a single front against the American-Pakistan government alliance. While the common people have taken up the call of jihad, convincing the scholars has proven more difficult.

"Every year more than one thousand Ulema [scholars] graduate from the Madrassas. But going to the battle, you will only find one Alim [scholar] that is good for the mujahidin," he said. "That's why I ask you, I hope from you to be with the mujahidin, to be with the fighters in combat. And urge your students in your universities, mosques and Madrassas."

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

GermanyUkaTrial.jpg

Smiling no more

Now, according to a BBC report, he says, "Today I can't understand myself how I could have acted this way."

If one believes his story, he's not only a murderer, but a gullible idiot. However, prior coverage found him in "radical" company on Facebook, and he said he wanted to "do [his] bit for Jihad," and that he "did it for Allah." During the crime, he shouted "Allahu Akbar."

But where he had been smiling mildly in the DPA photo above (reposted as-is, with his face partially pixellated), today he made an "emotional confession." "German Islamist terrorist confesses and blames fake jihad rape video for inspiring his crime," from the Telegraph, August 31 (thanks to Twostellas):

In an emotional confession to a Frankfurt court as his murder trial began on Wednesday, Arid Uka said he had become radicalised by online extremist propaganda before carrying out a lone gun attack US Air Force bus in March.
“What I did was wrong, but I cannot undo what I did,” he said.
Uka blamed a video purporting to show American servicemen raping a young Muslim girl for prompting him to try and stop other US soldiers from getting to Afghanistan.
“I thought what I saw in that video, these people would do in Afghanistan,” he told the court.
But the rape footage, billed as an authentic video entitled “what was done to our sisters,” turned out to be a fake using footage scene from the 2007 anti-Iraq war film “Redacted,” directed by Hollywood’s Brian de Palma.
“That is the irony of this case,” said Jens Joerg Hoffman, Uka’s defence lawyer. “It was an American film from a leading director that was so believable that it looked real.”
Uka is charged with two counts of murder and three of attempted murder in connection with the attack. He faces a possible life sentence....
| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. Once again, a "regional" jihad group supposedly driven by local grievances has apparently found common cause with groups geographically far removed from it. This is possible because they share the fundamental aim of imposing Sharia, the goal of jihad in all its forms.

Think jihad globally, wage jihad locally. "Nigeria: Al-Qaida-Linked Man Involved in UN Bombing," from Voice of America, August 31:

Nigerian authorities say a man with links to al-Qaida helped orchestrate last week's bombing of the U.N. headquarters in Abuja that killed 23 people.
The Nigerian State Security Service said Wednesday that Mamman Nur, a member of the radical Islamist sect Boko Haram, masterminded the attack while working “in concert” with two other suspects who have been arrested.
The statement says Nur had recently returned from Somalia, where al-Qaida agents have helped insurgent group al-Shabab fight the Somali government.
Nur remains at large. Nigerian authorities did not identify the two suspects in custody but said they are members of Boko Haram and have made “valuable statements.”
Last Friday, a suicide bomber detonated a car bomb inside the U.N. Abuja compound, wounding more than 80 people in addition to the 23 deaths.
A man who identified himself as a Boko Haram spokesman told VOA that the group was responsible for the attack.
Boko Haram, whose name means “Western education is sinful,” has been blamed for many bombings and shootings of authority figures in northeastern Nigeria, mainly in the state of Borno. The group has also claimed responsibility for attacks in Abuja, including a June bombing outside Nigeria's national police headquarters.
The group wants a strict form of Islamic law applied more widely across Nigeria.

That is, across all of it.

Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan has vowed to increase security and bring terrorism in the country under control.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As we noted in a prior report on the risk of honor killings and rape in Libya, this is the population from which a tolerant, pluralistic civil society is supposed to spring forth now that it's no longer hindered by a lone autocratic weirdo. A democracy is only as good as the values that inform its participants, and therein lies peril for human rights in Libya in the near future.

The National Transitional Council's draft constitution enshrines Sharia as the source of legislation. Despite the law's brutal and specific punishments for other acts it defines as criminal, a parent who kills a child may face no penalty at all under Sharia.

It is all too likely that the NTC will kick the can down the road on women's rights to avoid specifics on the issue, saying it has more pressing matters to attend to, just as Egyptian women were told "their concerns were not urgent in the aftermath of the uprising." "Father slit throats of three daughters in 'honour killing' after they were raped by Gaddafi's troops," by Liz Hazelton for the Daily Mail, August 30:

A father slit the throat of his three teenage daughters in an ‘honour killing’ after they were raped by Gaddafi loyalists during the siege of the port city of Misrata.
Allegations of the shocking executions are contained in a report by the respected Physicians for Human Rights group into war crimes and atrocities in the embattled city, which faced two months of being cut off from the rest of Libya.
The father is said to have carried out the ‘honour killings’ because of his humiliation and shame at the rape of the sisters – aged 15, 17 and 18 – in Tomina, on the outskirts of Misrata. The victims were not named. [...]

A stable society is not possible where killing is acceptable to relieve "humiliation and shame."

Richard Sollom, who was the lead author on the report, concluded that no one had evidence that rape was widespread - but the fear of sexual assault was endemic.

The assailants know the girls' and women's lives are over after they have been raped. They are essentially killing them twice.

Researchers also heard reports of suspected honour killings - including the murder of the three sisters by their father.
But PHR also noted that 'some in Tomina have stood up against this practice, including a well-known sheik who has publicly advocated for raped women and girls to be seen as brave and bringing honor to their families'....

Common sense sometimes prevails over the brutal idiocy of punishing the victim, but the nature of future laws in Libya could make it more difficult to challenge the status quo.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"War is deceit," after all. And the evidence is mounting that a story used to inflame anti-American hatred and justify violence may be an elaborate work of fiction. "Daughter Gadhafi said was dead apparently lives," by Hadeel al-Shalchi for the Associated Press, August 30:

TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) — Since the rebel takeover of Tripoli, evidence has been mounting that Moammar Gadhafi may have lied about the death of his adopted baby daughter Hana in a 1986 U.S. airstrike.

The reason why the airstrike happened in the first place often gets left out of the discussion:

The strike hit Gadhafi's home in his Tripoli compound, Bab al-Aziziya, in retaliation for the Libyan-sponsored bombing of a Berlin nightclub earlier that year that killed two U.S. servicemen. At the time, Gadhafi showed American journalists a picture of a dead baby and said it was his adopted daughter Hana — the first public mention that she even existed.
Diplomats almost immediately questioned the claim. But Gadhafi kept the story alive through the years.
Then, when investigations into the 1988 Pan Am airliner bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, pointed to a Libyan hand in the attack, some theorized that Gadhafi had ordered it to avenge Hana's death in the U.S. airstrike.
But when Libyan rebels took over Tripoli and Bab al-Aziziya last week, they found a room in Gadhafi's home with Hana's birth certificate and pictures of a young woman with the name "Hana" written on the back, possible indications that she lived well beyond infancy. A Tripoli hospital official surfaced, saying Hana worked for him as a surgeon up until the rebels came to town.
And on Tuesday, Swiss officials confirmed that Hana's name had briefly appeared earlier this year on a Swiss government document listing the names of senior Libyan figures targeted for sanctions.
Many Libyans believe Hana was never killed and talked about her existence openly.
Adel Shaltut, a Libyan diplomat at the U.N. in Geneva, said it was common knowledge that Hana Gadhafi wasn't killed in the airstrike.
"All Libyans knew from the very beginning that it's a lie," he told The Associated Press, saying that Hana was married and had children.
However, some in Libya believed that after Hana's death, Gadhafi adopted another daughter and gave her the same name in a memorial tribute.
Adding to the mystery, two AP photographs from the 1990s show an adolescent girl identified in captions as Gadhafi's daughter Hana. In one of them from 1999, she is standing next to South African President Nelson Mandela, with his arm around her, during a family visit to Cape Town. Gadhafi's only biological daughter, Aisha, stands on Mandela's other side and Gadhafi's wife Safiya is next to the girl identified as Hana.
In another AP photo from 1996, Gadhafi is seen wiping the face of a girl identified in the caption as his daughter Hana Gadhafi.

Oops.

Despite these sightings of Hana, in 2006 Gadhafi organized an event called the "Hana Festival for Freedom and Peace" to commemorate the 20th anniversary of her death. Performers reportedly included Lionel Richie and Spanish tenor Jose Carreras.

Party, karamu, fiesta... is over.

Last week, after rebels stormed the Bab al-Aziziya compound where Gadhafi and family members lived, journalists saw a room in his home filled with stuffed animals, photos of a young woman with the name "Hana" written on the back in Arabic and a birth certificate of "Hana Gadhafi."
Rebels touring the room told reporters that everyone in Libya knew that the daughter who the world thought was dead was, in fact, alive....
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. Reservations about negotiating with the Taliban are, of course, more than reasonable, but there is the principle of the matter in our "friend and ally" Karzai's behavior. "Secret U.S.-Taliban talks were closing on deal to free kidnapped army sergeant before being scuppered by Karzai aides," by Oliver Pickup for the Daily Mail, August 30:

Secret talks between representatives of the United States and the Taliban were closing in on a deal to free a kidnapped army sergeant, but were scuppered when Hamid Karzai's aides leaked information about them.
Both U.S. and Afghan officials confirmed that the 54-year-old Afghan president kiboshed potential horse-trading with the Taliban, as he feared being out of the loop.
Though the discussions, held in Germany and Qatar, were only at a preliminary stage, a trade which would see Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, of Hailey, Idaho, captured two years ago, was mooted.
In return, the talks centred on the release of a number of Afghan prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, as well as the Bagram airbase.
But before any deals could be firmed up, Mr Karzai's aided leaked knowledge of the talks to the press, and all hope of striking a clandestine agreement were gone.
The Afghan president felt as though he was being undercut, according to U.S. officials close to the deals.
According to an unnamed senior Western diplomat in the region a childhood friend of his, Tayyab Aga, was the Taliban negotiator....
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 30, 2011

Where American law and practice conflict with Islamic law and practice, American law and practice have to give way. That is the way it always is. Otherwise, there will be violence. "Police arrest 15 at Playland in dispute over Muslim headwear," by Rebecca Baker and Jonathan Bandler for LoHud.com, August 30 (thanks to all who sent this in):

RYE — A large disturbance broke out at Playland Park today when Muslim visitors got angry that the park was enforcing its ban on headgear by prohibiting the women from wearing their traditional head coverings on some rides.

Police from at least nine other agencies converged on the park beginning at 3 p.m. after county police sought assistance in responding to the disturbance, which involved about 30 to 40 people. Twelve men and three women were arrested, mostly for disorderly conduct, and two park rangers were injured, authorities said. Two people were charged with felony assault after, officials said, they attacked park rangers.

The park was crowded with Muslims celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr, one of Islam's two major holidays. Most were from community groups around New York City as part of a day-long event arranged by the Muslim American Society of New York.

The Muslim American Society is the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. So it is no surprise that they expected the park to jump to do their bidding and change their policies to suit them.

Parks officials had “painstakingly” told the organizer about the headgear ban, said parks spokesman Peter Tartaglia, but he said that the rules might not have been communicated by the organizer to some attendees. The ban was implemented about four years ago to keep hats and other head coverings from landing on tracks and derailing rides.

It’s a safety issue on rides. If it’s a scarf, you could choke,” Tartaglia said.

Accounts of what had happened varied, but everyone agreed the dispute began after park-goers were told the headgear ban applied to women wearing traditional Muslim head coverings, known as hijabs.

Tartaglia said once word of that got out there were “a lot of unhappy people.”...

Lola Ali, 16, of Astoria said she had witnessed a group of girls and women wearing hijabs go to park security to confront them about the headgear issue.

Men within the park saw this and tried to intervene, Ali said, and the situation went downhill from there.

“They were beating down the girls then they started beating down the guys,” she said of the security officers.

Earlier, a park cashier told a Journal News reporter that a woman wearing a hijab either pushed or hit a ride operator who forbade her from going on the ride. She said a police officer tried to restrain the woman and the woman’s husband took offense, at which point a multiple-person fight broke out.

The park was never closed to attendees but for a time new visitors were not being allowed in. Crowds were being turned away at Playland Parkway and Forest Avenue. Officials said late in the afternoon that they were slowly reopening the park to new visitors and that the group’s religious ceremony planned for 9 p.m. could still occur....

Brooklyn resident Amr Khater, who had come to the park at about noon with his family, said his family was told about the hijab rule by park employees when they arrived.

“Everybody got mad, everybody got upset,” he said. “It’s our holiday. Why would you do this to us?”...

It's your holiday. That doesn't mean you can make Playland bend to your will and change its longstanding safety policies, that were not formulated in order to victimize you.

At 4:30 p.m., more than an hour and a half after the incident started, nearly three dozen cruisers blocked Playland's entrance and a helicopter was flying overhead. A reporter counted nearly 60 cruisers on the scene from various agencies....

Playland's policies, posted on its website, include: "All items and clothing must be appropriately secured while on a ride; some smaller items can be stored/secured in cargo pockets or waist pouches. Hats must be secured, and jackets/sweaters must be worn properly and not around the waist while on a ride. Some rides do not allow backpacks, purses or head gear of any kind."...

Oh, the Islamophobia!

| 49 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"The first blast occurred when officers attempted to detain a suspected militant in the Chechen capital of Grozny." See, if only the officers weren't so "Islamophobic" as to interfere with the activities of the glorious mujahedin, none of this would have happened. Will the Islamophobia never end? "Russian report: 7 dead in 2 blasts in Chechnya," from CNN, August 30 (thanks to Kenneth):

(CNN) -- Two blasts -- the second coming after police and passersby had gathered at the site of the first -- killed seven people and wounded 18 Tuesday evening in the Russian republic of Chechnya, according to the Russian news agency RIA Novosti.

The state-run agency said the first blast occurred when officers attempted to detain a suspected militant in the Chechen capital of Grozny. About 30 minutes after that explosion, a second blast hit the same area after people had gathered there, RIA Novosti said....

Rebels in Chechnya started out fighting for independence in the 1990s, but in recent years the fight has been aimed more at imposing Islamist rule and asserting their authority in the area.

The standard of living in the southwestern republic is poor compared with the rest of Russia. Unemployment is rampant and infant mortality is high. In addition, the Chechen population of about 1 million is mostly made up of Sunni Muslims, who maintain a distinctly separate cultural and linguistic identity from Russian Orthodox Christians.

Note CNN's spin: this is all about poverty, not jihad. That's why you see so many Haitian suicide bombers.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Everyone knows that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ and that only greasy Islamophobes pause from raking in the bucks long enough to suggest otherwise, so Abdul Hakiim's conversion to Islam couldn't have anything to do with his sudden interest in setting off bombs. This one is, a Pamela Geller says, "a real headscratcher"! "The Path of a Young German Salafist," by Julia Jüttner in Spiegel, August 30 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Robert B. wore long robes, dreamed of paradise and called himself Abdul Hakiim. He and his friend were arrested in July for trying to enter Britain with bomb-making guides and al-Qaida propaganda. They now sit in a London high-security prison. But Robert's motivations remain a mystery.

A mother can't be fooled, and a mother notices when her child goes astray, says Marlies B. That's why she called the state authorities in October 2010 and asked if she needed to be worried about her son.

Her son Robert had changed. He'd converted to Islam, forsaken pork and alcohol, and now he wore a knit wool cap and wandered the city of Solingen, northeast of Cologne, in floor-length garments. Marlies B. says she'd never seen him this way. People asked her about it, and it was embarrassing. It frightened her. [...]

He'd taken the ferry to Dover with Christian E., another convert from Solingen, who had a criminal record. At the border they told authorities they had planned to fly from Brussels to Egypt, but the tickets were too expensive. So they'd settled on Great Britain instead.

Officials searched their bags and found handbooks for jihadists, a bomb-making pamphlet called, "How to Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom," and an essay on "39 Ways to Support Jihad," written by the radical imam Anwar al-Awlaki -- all propaganda material for al-Qaida. Both Germans were sent to Belmarsh, a high-security prison in south London, and isolated in solitary confinement. [...]

Even as a child, Robert was an outsider and was bullied and chased across the school yard. He dropped out of school in the 9th grade. When he was 17 he joined the military, with his mother's approval, and volunteered to go to Afghanistan. He dreamed of riding in a tank. But he wound up on desk duty. When this duty grew boring, he started spreading right-wing propaganda on the Internet. He hung a Hitler portrait over his bunk. He was forced to leave the army. [...]

In January 2009, Robert converted to Islam. He told his mother this in passing at lunch one day. She says she doesn't know who encouraged him to do it. Robert kept his curly hair cut short and didn't grow a beard. "He did not seem so extreme to me," she says.

She dismissed Robert's comments that she should re-orient her religion, and wear a headscarf or a burka at home, as idle chatter. She had no idea he already called himself Abdul Hakiim.

In October, he and other Muslims travelled to Egypt. "I want to learn Arabic, in order to practice my beliefs," he told his mother. She alerted German authorities, and some officials paid Robert a visit. To this day, he does not know that his mother was behind it, she says. Officials placated her by saying they had him under their radar.

Because of the unrest in Egypt, Robert took a special flight home to Germany on February 1, 2011. He checked in with his mother by phone. She cooked spaghetti with ground beef that had been slaughtered according to Islamic ritual by a special butcher in Solingen. He spent two nights in her apartment. Then he moved out, and started to live on state assistance. [...]

She now knows that before his trip to Britain he visited mosques in Cologne and Bonn. She knows he flew to Hamburg to see a presentation by Pierre Vogel, also known as Abu Hamza -- a radical German Islamic preacher and former professional boxer who had become a hero for Robert....

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

While there continue to be concerns about Libya's unconventional weapons and potential "dirty bomb" material, lighter conventional weapons are already reported to be on the market. And there also remains the possibility of a second "storefront" opening up upon the fall of the Assad regime.

"'Gaza militants have Libyan arms'," from Reuters, August 29:

Palestinians in Gaza have acquired anti-aircraft and anti-tank rockets from Libya during its six-month civil war, enlarging but not significantly improving their arsenal, Israeli officials said on Monday.
While the rebellion against Muammar Gaddafi has stirred concern abroad about the fate of Libya's ageing chemical weapons stockpiles, Israel has no indication Hamas or other Palestinian factions have sought these, the officials said.
Instead, Israeli officials have detected an inflow of SA-7 anti-aircraft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), said one official, describing an overland supply route that opened up between eastern Libya – after it fell to the rebels – and the Gaza Strip via Egypt.
"We've been seeing more SA-7s and RPGs coming across," said the official. "It's not a major qualitative enhancement for them."
The Soviet-designed SA-7 is a shoulder-fired, heat-seeking missile which Israel said Palestinians had previously smuggled into Gaza. Rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), designed to penetrate armour, are plentiful in the territory.
Another Israeli official said "thousands" of the weapons had reached Gaza in recent months, but did not provide figures on how many had originated in Libya.
Egypt's Sinai peninsula, which borders both Israel and Gaza, has long seen traffic in arms bound for Palestinians. The weapons come up through Sudan or arrive by ship over the Mediterranean.
State television reported in Cairo Monday that Egyptian border guards had discovered "a large quantity" of weapons at the border with Libya, giving no more details....
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Never mind how that would paralyze the Saudi economy, dependent as it is on what often amounts to slave labor, as demonstrated by so many horror stories, and the denial of freedom of religion and worship to non-Muslim foreign workers.

But what kind of intolerant person would demand the expulsion of other religions from his territory? Not just al-Qaeda's Ibrahim al-Rubeish, but Muhammad himself:

"I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim." - Sahih Muslim 19.4366.

"Qaeda chief tells Saudi prince to expel non-Muslims," from Agence France-Presse, August 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A senior Saudi member of Al-Qaeda warned the interior minister that he should expel non-Muslims from the kingdom, among other demands to stop considering him a target, in an online audio message.
Ibrahim al-Rubeish, a former Guantanamo detainee, addressed Prince Nayef bin Abdulaziz with seven measures which he considered essential for "reform" in the ultra-conservative Gulf state and for the prince's own safety, SITE Intelligence reported on Monday.
The measures included expelling non-Muslims from the Arabian Peninsula, repealing all man-made laws and instituting (Islamic) sharia-based governance, the US-based monitoring service said.

Saudi Arabia certainly brought enough Sharia for the rest of the class, but this just goes to demonstrate again: Since Sharia governs all areas of Muslim life, there can always be more of it to enforce on people. Someone will always want more Sharia -- or the "right" Sharia -- and be willing to kill and overthrow governments for it.

They also included releasing prisoners, allowing preachers to speak with impunity and removing themselves as obstacles to those who wish to support Muslims in Iraq and the Palestinian territories, it added.
"This is the path if you wish to survive. If you do this, I will guarantee that the mujahedeen will not prepare another trap for you and that you will sleep safely in your bed and you will go as you please without fearing anyone," Rubeish said.
He was alluding to an incident earlier this month when a gunman fired at Prince Nayef's palace near the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah.
Saudi Arabia witnessed a wave of deadly attacks by Al-Qaeda between 2003 and 2006, which prompted Prince Nayef to launch a security force crackdown on the local branch of the jihadist network founded by Saudi-born Osama bin Laden.
Al-Qaeda remains very active in neighbouring Yemen, where the Saudi and Yemeni franchises of Al-Qaeda joined forces under the banner of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
A suicide bomber from the group blew himself up in August 2009 in an abortive attempt on the life of Prince Nayef's son, Prince Mohammed, who leads the campaign against Islamist militants in the kingdom.
In comments published by Saudi daily Al-Eqtissadiya on Monday, Prince Nayef said that terrorism would remain a threat to the kingdom.
"We will continue to be a target for terrorists, who will continue attempting to attack us, supported by other parties," the newspaper quoted him as saying.
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One of the oddest and most telling aspects of this Rick Perry/Aga Khan curriculum controversy is that when Pamela Geller and I started writing about the curriculum, it was scrubbed from the web. Now it has been scrubbed from the Google cache, as I noted here. This is highly suspicious, and gives the lie to those who claim that the curriculum material was actually innocuous, or that we weren't actually discussing the actual curriculum material, or that we were discussing curriculum material that was only used by a few Texas teachers at best. Clearly we had the right stuff, and clearly it was bad, and clearly Perry's people knew it was bad, and that is why it is gone now.

But Pamela Geller has screenshots of it all, as well as the full text, here.

When Geller and I first started criticizing the Rick Perry/Aga Khan curriculum on Islam for Texas schools, the response was furious, and primarily focused on two claims.

First, defenders of Perry such as David Stein and Ace of the Ace of Spades blog claimed that what we had wasn't the curriculum at all, and presented what they said was actually the curriculum. This turned out to be false, as I explained here: they were presenting one teacher's lesson plan as the official curriculum, while what we were presenting was actually the official material, developed by the Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) and UT-Austin in a partnership known as the Muslim Histories and Cultures Program (MHC) and proudly announcing that it was the fruit of "Governor Rick Perry's desire to better educate Texas teachers on Muslim topics." It also says that "Governor Perry was instrumental in getting this program off the ground."

Neither Stein nor Ace nor any of those who have echoed their false claims have ever admitted that they were not working from the actual curriculum, and passing off as the official curriculum something that was not remotely that.

Second, as my old friend Bryan Preston claims here, many asserted that the curriculum -- the real one, that we presented -- wasn't so bad anyway, or as Bryan says, "I don’t think it’s a dawah." Preston also downplays the connection of Rick Perry to the curriculum, which I have shown in the quotes above. Dawah is Islamic proselytizing, and it takes many forms. In Methodology of Dawah by Shamim A. Siddiqi, a book that is designed to teach Muslims how to convert people to Islam, Siddiqi tells Muslims to present Islam in a "concocted or abbreviated form" and only introduce them to "the revolutionary aspect of Islam" after they convert.

Concocted = made up. Abbreviated = things are cut out. And that is just what the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum does: it presents a fantasy benign Islam, with all the violent and oppressive bits cut out. Here are some of the elements of the program that show it to be a whitewash of Islam:

Session One

  • The main reading is from Carl Ernst’s Following Muhammad, the first three chapters. This book whitewashes Muhammad, saying that he “was, by all accounts, a charismatic person known for his integrity” (p. 85). Muhammad’s exhortations to make war against unbelievers, his multiple marriages and child marriage, and other negative aspects of his biography are explained away or ignored entirely. 
  • The curriculum directs participants to “consider Carl Ernst’s statement, ‘It is safe to say that no religion has such a negative image in Western eyes as Islam.’” Then it asks them: “Why is this so? How have political and economic relationships between the Middle East and Western Europe and the United States impacted perceptions of Islam, in the past and the present? How have they impacted perceptions of the ‘West’ among Muslims?” Note that participants are guided to see the “negative image” of Islam as the result of “political and economic relationships between the Middle East and Western Europe and the United States.” No hint is given of the possibility that Islam might have a “negative image” in the West because of jihad conquests, institutionalized oppression of women and non-Muslims, and the like.
  • The curriculum quotes Edward Said, who ascribed all critical discussion of Islamic jihad and Islamic supremacism to racism and neo-colonialism, as warning that one should speak of “Islams rather than Islam,” and warns that in dealing with Islam “one has entered an astoundingly complicated world.” This invocation of Islam’s complexity is frequently used to discourage those who point to the Qur’an’s violent passages and Muhammad’s exhortations to warfare as evidence of Islam’s bellicose intentions. Yet Islamic jihadists routinely refer to this material with no hesitation based on Islam’s “complexity.”

Session Two

  • Readings for the session entitled “Muhammad through History” include Celebrating Muhammad: Images of the Prophet in Popular Muslim Poetry and The Miraculous Journey of Mahomet. It notes, correctly, that “for millions of Muslims around the world, the Prophet Muhammad has become the paradigm, or role model, who is worthy of being emulated.” However, there is no hint whatsoever of how Muhammad, as a model to be emulated, has inspired jihad warriors and terrorists.
  • The common Islamic apologetic claim that Islam inspired all the greatest achievements of Western Judeo-Christian civilization appears in the assertion that “there is strong evidence to suggest that Muslim poetic accounts of the mi’raj, reaching Europe through the Arab courts in medieval Spain, inspired the Italian writer Dante to compose his famous work, The Divine Comedy.” No mention is made of how Dante placed Muhammad in hell as a false prophet.

Session Three

  • This session on the Qur’an makes no mention whatsoever of the elements of the Qur’an that exhort Muslims to hate unbelievers and make war against them (98:6; 48:29; 47:4; 2:191; 4:89; 9:5; 9:29: 9:123; etc.) The text used is Michael Sells’s Approaching the Qur’an: The Early Revelations, which doesn’t even include the sections of the Qur’an that most directly and emphatically call for violence against non-Muslims.
  • The curriculum makes sure to point out that “believers point to this very perfection of the text as the proof of the prophethood of Muhammad,” and that “for many, the notion that the Qur’an is inimitable, that is, no human could possibly have produced anything so perfect, proves that it had to be God who revealed this message to Muhammad.” But it makes no mention of the text’s designation of non-believers as “the most vile of created beings” (98:6), the warlike passages noted above; its call to beat disobedient women (4:34) and the like.

Session Four

  • This second session on the Qur’an tells participants to “discuss the role of the Qur’an in providing direction for an ethical life.” Here again, no mention is made of the ways in which Islamic jihadists use the Qur’an’s teachings to justify violence against and the subjugation of unbelievers.
  • The curriculum lists eight central themes of the Qur’an. Although there are well over 100 Qur’an verses exhorting believers to jihad warfare, jihad does not make the list.

Session Five

  • This session on the Sunni/Shi’ite split and other sects in Islam fails to mention one salient point: Islamic law calls for the execution of heretics and apostates; this law has been the foundation for an extraordinary amount of bloodshed between adherents of various Muslim sects throughout history and today.

Session Six

  • This session dismisses as a “misconception” the idea that “Islam forbids music and representational art.” It does not explain why so many Muslims, including the Taliban who destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas, came to hold this “misconception.”

Session Seven

  • Participants are asked, “What conditions in Baghdad encouraged such a vast array of discoveries and inventions?” But the readings give no hint of the fact that Jews and Christians in Baghdad actually accounted for the great majority of these inventions. See here for a full explanation.
  • Participants are also asked: “Why was there such an abundance of inventions and discoveries attributed to Muslims in Medieval times but not today?” This question guides students toward a discussion of the trumped-up and manipulative modern concept of “Islamophobia.”
  • The curriculum states: “The religion that the Prophet Muhammad preached provided his followers an ethical and moral vision for leading a life of righteousness.” Again, no mention is made of Muhammad’s exhortations to hate and violence, his child marriage (which many Muslims consider exemplary behavior and imitate it), and the like.
  • The curriculum states: “Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians, who were subjects of new Arab rulers, could maintain their religious practices provided they paid jizya, a tax in tribute in lieu of military service.” It gives no hint of the institutionalized discrimination and humiliation that this dhimmi status involved.
  • The curriculum quotes Maria Rosa Menocal, the modern scholar most responsible for the myth of a tolerant, pluralistic Muslim Spain. It also discusses this tolerant Muslim Spain as a fact. In reality, however, Jews and Christians had a humiliating second-class status in Muslim Spain. When one Muslim ruler appointed a Jew as a local governor in Granada in 1066, the Muslims rioted and murdered four thousand Jews. The curriculum doesn’t mention any of that.

Session Eight

  • The readings for this session again include Carl Ernst’s Following Muhammad, as well as John Esposito’s The Straight Path. Both are highly apologetic, one-sided works that give the reader little idea why Muslims would wage jihad or commit violence in the name of Islam. No works of other perspectives are included.
  • The curriculum blames the restriction of rights of Muslim women on European colonialism, ignoring the many Islamic texts and teachings that restrict women’s rights.

Session Nine

  • The participants are again directed to read Carl Ernst and John Esposito, as well as another modern-day non-Muslim Islamic apologist, Charles Kurzman. No works of differing perspectives are presented.

Don't believe me? Fine. Examine the material for yourself here.

| 77 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More sterling behavior from the entity that wants to be handed a state in September without acting like one. This new form of blood libel has become popular in the past few years, bolstered by a bogus story in a major Swedish paper in 2009, and surfaces every now and then in one form or another.

Never mind the substantive accusations against jihadists in Kosovo of doing exactly what Issa Qaraqi is accusing Israel of doing. These allegations will be given far more credence.

They will also be used as a pretext for additional violence and threats against Israel, as Qaraqi surely knows. "PA minister claims Israel harvests Palestinian organs," by Herb Keinon for the Jerusalem Post, August 30:

The Palestinian Authority Minister of Prisoner Affairs Issa Qaraqi’ was quoted Sunday as saying Israel is the “major harvesting and trading center” of body organs in the world. His comments come even as the Defense Ministry is recommending to the government the release of a few hundred Palestinian prisoners to PA President Mahmoud Abbas in September to try and create a better atmosphere in the West Bank.
The prisoner release is part of a number of steps being discussed, including the return of the bodies of terrorists buried in Israel, whose goal is to improve the overall attitude on the Palestinian streets in advance of September.
The prisoners to be released would be Fatah members, none of whom is on the list being discussed for a possible deal with Hamas for the release of Gilad Schalit.
By contrast, the Saudi-based Arab News.com reported Sunday that Qaraqi’, “during the national day of Palestinian campaign to retrieve martyrs’ bodies,” accused Israel of harvesting parts from “the bodies of dead Palestinian martyrs without the consent of their families.” According to the website, Qaraqi’ said Israel was holding on to the remains of “Palestinian martyrs to conceal the crimes it committed against the martyrs’ bodies and to punish their families.”
Claiming that Israel was “holding the remains of 338 Arab and Palestinian fighters” in secret cemeteries, he said the “holding of the martyrs’ remains for many years casts doubts and accusations that Israel assassinated them after detention, or harvested their organs.”
The PA minister’s comments were swiftly denounced by Israel, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor saying that by “promoting heinous lies and blood libels, the Palestinians may score a few cheap points among the ignorant and the racists, but they will not be gaining any dignity and respect.

Well said.

Dealing in hate mongering will not lead anyone to respect them,” Palmor said, adding that “they that sow the wind, shall reap the whirlwind.”
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On alert for Islamic Jihad's potential Ramadan finale. "Vilnai: 10-man terror cell planning attack from Sinai," from the Jerusalem Post, August 30:

A cell of more than 10 terrorists is currently in the Sinai with plans to carry out an attack against Israel along its border with Egypt, Home Front Defense Minister Matan Vinai said on Tuesday.
“Islamic Jihad is trying for a long time to perpetrate the attacks from the Sinai and the of Id al-Fitr is a good time for attacks,” Vilnai said during a visit to an Elbit Systems factory in Sderot in reference to the Muslim holiday which begins on Tuesday. “The defense establishment has concrete intelligence regarding plans by a terror cell from the Sinai consisting of more than 10 people.”
Vilnai said that the IDF and the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) were working in close cooperation to thwart the attack and that Israel was also coordinating with Egypt.
On Monday, the IDF went on high alert along Israel’s southern border with Egypt on Monday and significantly bolstered its forces there amid concrete intelligence that Islamic Jihad terrorists were planning to infiltrate into Israel and carry out a similar attack to the one near Eilat 10 days ago. [...]
Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz made the decision to beef up forces along the border late Sunday night and instructed OC Planning Directorate Maj.-Gen. Amir Eshel to update the Egyptian military of the decision.
IDF sources said that intelligence indicated that the Islamic Jihad cell had crossed into the Sinai Peninsula from the Gaza Strip and was planning to carry out an attack along one of the roads that runs alongside the border in the coming days. As a result, both Roads 12 and 10 remained closed on Tuesday.
A senior defense official said on Tuesday that Israel was restraining itself and not taking action against the Islamic Jihad in order to not undermine the Egyptian regime.

Egypt has reportedly launched raids in Sinai, reasserting control after having "completely lost" it there, by some estimates.

Israel’s ties with the interim military-controlled regime in Egypt has been tenuous since the attacks near Eilat on August 18 and amid growing calls within Egypt to review the peace treaty between the countries. As a result, Israel decided not to launch a larger offensive against terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Now that the 'holy' month of Bombadan Ramadan has ended, Muslims are now celebrating the holiday of Eid ('Hari Raya' in Malay parlance). For most Malaysian Muslims, this holiday means food (day-long feasts are common) and being with family, with journeys back to hometowns ('balik kampung') being firmly embedded in local culture. And as the Malaysian government has reminded Muslims, 'Hari Raya' is also another opportunity for them to proselytize to local infidels non Muslims. "Share beliefs with others, Muslims urged", The Star, 30 August 2011.

PETALING JAYA: Muslims should take the opportunity of Hari Raya to share their beliefs and practices with those of other faiths, said Selangor Mentri Besar [State Governor] Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

“The celebration ['Hari Raya'] may be for those of the Islamic faith but this does not mean we should take an exclusive attitude. We must use this opportunity to share our knowledge, which is required by its followers and in Islam,” he said.

One wonders which parts of Islam will be shared. Institutionalized wife beating? Hatred of other belief systems? Enforcement of the humiliating jizya tax? Allowing the murder of so-called infidels?  

This ill-timed pronouncement comes on the heels of a scandal involving Christians alleged to have proselytized to Muslims at a church dinner in Selangor earlier this month . Such acts are, of course, illegal under Islamic and Malaysian laws. Yet Muslims are never restricted from engaging in their own prosetylization activities, AKA 'dawah', either through lavish government-supported programs, or via their own unofficial efforts. Religious freedom for Muslims, but never for the non Muslims -- Islam forbids it.

It's doubtful that this Malay minister quoted above can see the monumental arrogance, let alone the irony of issuing such proclamations such as this. But pointing out such hypocrisy par excellence would undoubtedly be Islamophobic.
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Enjoy this superb takedown by Michael Coren of the slick and sinister Islamic supremacist Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf of the Ground Zero Mosque initiative, and his claim that Sharia and the U.S. Constitution are compatible. Be sure to watch it all. Seldom has Sharia been so fully, concisely, and magnificently exposed.

Video thanks to the incomparable Kathy Shaidle.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

FearInc.Jihad.jpg


In "Fear, Inc.: The Business of Saving Jihad From 'Islamophobia'" in Human Events this morning, I discuss the irony of the release of the latest slick and well-funded "Islamophobia" report just as more jihad attacks are being perpetrated and more jihad plots uncovered:

This past week, “Mohammed K.,” a Muslim teenager in Maryland, was arrested for plotting jihad murder along with Colleen LaRose​, aka “Jihad Jane​,” who tried to recruit jihadists to kill Lars Vilks, a Swedish cartoonist who dared poke fun at Islam’s prophet Muhammad. Mohammed K. also wrote in an Islamic jihadist chat room about carrying out a Columbine-style shooting in his high school in the name of Islam, because “the kids who study in my school proudly state that their parents work in NSA [National Security Agency] and FBI.”

Also last week, two Muslims beat unconscious an ex-Muslim author, Paris Dipersico, for writing a book, Wake Up Call, in which he wrote: “Islam is a religion of ‘peace’ and Muslims will kill you to prove it.” Dipersico said that his attackers “called me a Jew in Arabic and said the Jews are paying you to write this against Islam.” Other Muslims threatened to kill him.

Meanwhile, here again in the last few days, Islamic jihadists murdered 18 people in a jihad/martyrdom suicide car bombing at the United Nations headquarters in Nigeria’s capital, Abuja. Other Islamic jihadists murdered 18 more people in a jihad/martyrdom suicide attack in Algeria. In Somalia, Islamic jihadists beheaded 11 people, in accord with the Koran’s exhortation to behead unbelievers (47:4). In Pakistan, a Muslim gang put a gun to the head of Mehek Masih, a 14-year-old Christian girl, at her home. As they kidnapped her, one of them told her parents that he was going to force Mehek to “convert to Islam and become my mistress.”

And as all this was happening, the far-Left Center for American Progress issued “Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America,” the latest in an ever-lengthening string of markedly similar “exposés” claiming that the problem America and the world face is not Islamic jihad, but “Islamophobia.” These reports all claim to show that the anti-jihad movement in America is a sinister cabal of well-funded, dishonest hacks stirring up hate against innocent Muslims in order to profit from it. Like them, it is highly distorted and markedly unfair, twisting the facts and cooking the data in order not to enlighten but to manipulate, not to educate but to propagandize.

And all that Islamic jihad activity just in the past week? “Fear, Inc.” gives no indication that any of it ever happened....

There is more.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Tolerance" and "respect" are to be a one-way street where Islamic supremacism holds sway. Any sense of reciprocal duties implies an equality of responsibility which could detract from the subjugated status of unbelievers. And that's clearly just... intolerable. "Muslim extremists against movie that promotes tolerance and dialogue," by Mathias Hariyadi for Asia News, August 29:

Jakarta (AsiaNews) – The Islamic Defender Front (FPI), an extremist Muslim organisation, is promoting a protest campaign against SCTV, a Jakarta-based private TV station, for scheduling “?”, a movie deemed offensive to Muslims that was directed by a young talented filmmaker, Hanung Bramantyo. Even though, the movie tells a story about tolerance and respect between Indonesia’s various religious groups, the FPI and other Islamist groups say it “pollutes the morality” of Indonesian Muslims.
Jakarta FPI leader Habib Salim Alatas warned the SCTV management that thousands of Muslims would join to demonstrate in front of the TV station should it broadcast the movie Monday night.
Released in April, “?” was recently attacked by the Indonesian Ulema Movement (MUI), which issued a fatwa ordering Muslims not to see it because of its misleading content and its suggestion that there is another ‘God’ beside the one recognised and worshipped within Islam.

By banning it, they have made it an instant object of curiosity and given the movie far more notoriety than if they had opted to ignore it.

Filmmaker Hanung Bramantyo has called on TV executives not to give in to extremist pressures because doing so would mean accepting a patent violation of freedom of expression.
The FPI is not new to threats. In recent weeks, FPI extremists attacked members of the Ahmadi community, a sect viewed as heretical by mainstream Muslims, in Makassar (southern Sulawesi).
In a similar incident, Muslim extremists attack street vendors in Bandung (West Java) for selling alcoholic beverages.
In the recent past, human rights activists have slammed the Indonesian government for doing nothing against extremists.
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has been especially targeted for criticism because of his failure to take decisive action to stem the rise of Islamists, who are now able to make any claim they want.
Now, just before the end of Ramadan and Idul Fitri on Tuesday, extremists want to censor TV broadcasting.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 29, 2011

He also says that Christians in Egypt will have to submit and pay the jizya in a state of humiliation. And that there will be no art or tourism in the Egyptian Sharia State. Sheikh 'Adel Shehato is a severe Misunderstander of Islam. He says things that I get branded with "Islamophobia" for saying in America. If only the Center for American Progress or the SPLC or Hamas-linked CAIR would explain how it is that so many imams and Islamic leaders like Sheikh 'Adel Shehato keep misunderstanding Islam in the exact same way that greasy Islamophobes do.

"Senior Official in Egyptian Islamic Jihad: If We Come to Power, We will Launch a Campaign of Islamic Conquests to Instate Shari'a Worldwide: 'The Christian is Free to Worship His God in His Church, but if the Christians Make Problems for the Muslims, I Will Exterminate Them,'" from MEMRI, August 29 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

On August 13, 2011, the Egyptian daily Roz Al-Yousef published an interview[1] with Sheikh 'Adel Shehato, a senior official in Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), who, on March 23, 2011, was freed from prison in the wake of the Egyptian revolution. He was imprisoned in 1991 upon returning from a three-year sojourn in Afghanistan. [...]

Following are excerpts of the interview:

Sheikh 'Adel Shehato

The Term "Democracy" is Not in the Arab or Islamic Lexicon; Once Allah's Law Reigns Supreme, the People's Role will End

Q: "Do you support the uprising?"

Shehato: "...The [Egyptian] youth rose up for a certain ideal... They did not rise up in order to put the shari'a into practice, nor did they [complain] that Mubarak's regime did not rule in accordance with the shari'a... As Muslims, we must believe that the Koran is our constitution, and that it is [therefore] impossible for us to institute a Western democratic regime. I oppose democracy because it is not the faith of the Muslims, but the faith of the Jews and Christians. Simply put, democracy means the rule of the people itself over itself... According to Islam, it is forbidden for people to rule and to legislate laws, as Allah alone is ruler. Allah did not hand down the term [democracy] as a form of rule, and it is completely absent from the Arab and Islamic lexicon..."

Q: "If you do not believe in the rule of the people, why did you go out to Al-Tahrir Square with the slogan 'he People Wants to Implement the Shari'a?' Are you exploiting democracy in order to achieve what you want [only] to then abolish [democracy]?"

Shehato: "I am not exploiting democracy, since I have never joined and will never join politics or party activity... We believe that implementation of the shari'a [must be accomplished] far from the political game, though some [other] Islamic streams are willing to participate [in this game] in order to achieve the same goal [i.e., implementation of the shari'a]. We said that 'the people wants to implement the shari'a' because most of the people are Muslims, and also based on [our] reading of the situation on the ground. [At the same time,] we did not make demands for the people's sake in the people's name, but demanded the rule of Allah. And once Allah's law is instated, the role of the people will end and Allah will reign supreme." [...]

Q: "Are you against blowing up churches?"

Shehato: "Yes and no. The Christian is free to worship his god in his church, but if the Christians make problems for the Muslims, I will exterminate them. I am guided by the shari'a, and it stipulates that they must pay the jizya tax while in a state of humiliation..."

Q: "These positions of yours frighten us, as Egyptians."

Shehato: "I will not act [in ways] that contradict my faith just in order to please the people... We say to the Christians, convert to Islam or pay the jizya, otherwise we will fight you. The shari'a is not based on [human] logic but on divine law. That is why we oppose universal, manmade constitutions."

If the Muslims Rise to Power in Egypt, They Will Form Muslim Battalions to Enforce the Shari'a Worldwide

Q: "If you rise to power in Egypt, will you launch a campaign of Islamic conquest?"

Shehato: "Of course we will launch a campaign of Islamic conquest, throughout the world. As soon as the Muslims and Islam control Egypt and implement the shari'a [there], we will turn to the neighboring regions, [such as] Libya [to the west] and Sudan to the south. All the Muslims in the world who wish to see the shari'a implemented worldwide will join the Egyptian army in order to form Islamic battalions, whose task will be to bring about the victory of [our] faith. We hope that, with Allah's help, Egypt will be the spark [that sets off this process]..."

Q: "You said that you endorse the ideology of Osama bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri. Does this mean that your way of implementing shari'a in Egypt will be through violence and war, like their [way]?"

Shehato: "No, we will implement the shari'a through da'wa [preaching], while violence will be directed only at the infidel Arab rulers. In their case, there is no choice but to use force, though the shari'a does not call it 'violence' but 'jihad for the sake of Allah.' There is no other way... because they have power and weapons..."

Q: "How will the foreign ministry [operate] in an Islamic state?"

Shehato: "There are Muslims and there are infidels. We will have ambassadors in every country. We want to call all other countries to join Islam, and that will be the task of the ambassadors. If [the countries] refuse, there will be war. We will not tolerate mutual trade and cultural ties with non-Muslims."

"In the [Islamic] State, There will Be Only Islamic Culture"

Q: "If you rise to power, what will be your approach to tourism?"

Shehato: "There will be tourism for purposes of [medical] treatment, but the tourism sites of the pyramids, the Sphinx, and Sharm Al-Sheikh will be shut down, because my task [as a ruler] is to get people to serve Allah rather than [other] people [i.e., tourists]. No proud Muslim will ever be willing to live off tourism profits, because the tourists come [to Egypt] to drink alcohol and fornicate.

Sheesh, Shehato, you don't have to travel all the way to Egypt to drink alcohol and fornicate.

[If they] want to come, they must comply with the conditions and laws of Islam. We will explain to them that, according to the shari'a, the pyramids are [the remains of] a pagan and polytheistic age."

Q: "What will be the state of art and literature in such a state?"
Shehato: "In Islam, there is no such thing as art. Painting, singing, and dancing are forbidden. Therefore, in the [Islamic] state there will be nothing but Islamic culture, for I cannot teach [people] the infidel culture. As for literature, such as [the works] of Naguib Mahfouz, it is forbidden. Naguib Mahfouz was a criminal who stimulated [people's] desires and struck a severe blow to modesty. We will return to the decent culture of the Muslims and the Muslim forefathers, and to Islamic history."

Endnote:

[1] Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt), August 13, 2011.

| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihadist groups are allied with the National Transitional Council anyway. They would not have thrown in their lot with the NTC unless there were something in it for them, and there has been plenty.

This, of course, is the same NTC that won't extradite al-Megrahi. One can't help but note that the timing of his turn for the worse is convenient amid the fall of Tripoli and pressure to hand him over. Time is clearly not in his favor where his cancer is concerned, but time will also tell if he is a lucky son-of-a-gun, saved by the bell, as it were, from extradition and prosecution, or how this situation may have been manipulated for a sympathetic photo-op as well. The clock will eventually run out, but he's been "at death's door" before, only to play "ding-dong-ditch."

The prisoners, on the other hand, lucked out. They didn't even have to call in sick. "Islamic militants among prisoners freed from Libyan jail," by Nic Robertson and Paul Cruickshank for CNN, August 26:

Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- Hundreds of Islamist militants were among the prisoners freed from a notorious Tripoli prison this week, according to a former Libyan jihadist.
The freed militants had been imprisoned in Tripoli's Abu Salim prison by Moammar Gadhafi's regime during the height of the insurgency in Iraq, according to Noman Benotman, once a senior figure in the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Benotman said he believes as many as 600 militants may have been among the prison population at Abu Salim.
It's not known how many prisoners were held in the vast facility. Human Rights Watch said Gadhafi's prisons "have been filled to the limit in the last few months with thousands of people who were arrested for taking part in the anti-Gadhafi protests, or because of their suspected support for Libya's democratic opposition."
The human rights group, which recently had a team visit the prison, estimates that before the uprising, there were a few hundred Islamists held at Abu Salim.
Benotman said many of the militants released are pro-al Qaeda.
"Nobody knows what these released prisoners are going to do next," he said. "Will they take part in the fighting and if they do will they join pre-existing rebel brigades or form a separate fighting force?"
Benotman, now a senior analyst at the Quilliam Foundation in London, said the freed prisoners are Salafists, embracing a puritanical interpretation of Islam that has gained ground in Libya in recent years.
Gadhafi's regime imprisoned thousands of suspected pro-al Qaeda militants after the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq stoked radicalization in Libya, especially in its impoverished eastern provinces. According to Benotman, those rounded up by the regime included militants who had tried to travel to Iraq and some who had returned from fighting against U.S. forces there. He said many of them had already been released by the Gadhafi regime.
Internal al Qaeda in Iraq records seized by the U.S. military in 2007 indicated that proportionately more Libyans traveled to fight with al Qaeda in Iraq than from any other Arab country. Some saw fighting in Iraq as a "a last act of defiance against the Gadhafi regime," according to a confidential 2008 State Department cable made public by the website WikiLeaks, because of the rapprochement at the time between Gadhafi and the United States.
Wednesday's prison release, which occurred as rebel forces took control of the Abu Salim area of Tripoli, comes as Islamists are taking on an increasingly prominent role in the fight against the Gadhafi regime -- to the concern of some in the West....

We tried to tell you.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will Honest Ibe Hooper or Boy Reza Aslan or some other giant of Moderate Islam denounce the Jama'at al-Tawhid wa'l-Jihad as Misunderstanders of Islam or even as Greasy Islamophobes? Or are they not misusing the Qur'an and Muhammad's words at all?

"Gaza-Based Salafi Group Launched Rockets at Israel," by Chana Ya'ar for Israel National News, August 28 (thanks to Benedict):

A radical Salafi Islamist group affiliated with the international Al Qaeda terrorist organization has taken responsibility for launching Sunday morning's Grad rocket attack at southern Israel.

The Jama'at al-Tawhid wa'l-Jihad (JTJ) jihadist organization (Group of Monotheism and Jihad) allegedly issued a statement claiming “credit” for the attack on Be'er Sheva, the largest city in Israel's southern region. [...]

Among the Koranic texts taught by al-Shami and cited by JTJ in justifying its slaughter is an alleged quote from the Islamic prophet Muhammad, “Whoever slaughters a non-Muslim [at war with Islam, or 'enemy occupiers'] sincerely for the sake of Allah, Allah will make hellfire prohibited upon him.”

That's not in a "Koranic text" at all. That's a hadith.

Another quote allegedly from Allah (G-d) often cited by the group to justify its actions directs operatives to behead its victims: “When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off the fingertip of them.”

That's a Koranic text: 8:12.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. Which occupation caused this suicide bombing?"Algeria attack claimed by al-Qaida offshoot," from the Associated Press, August 28:

ALGIERS, Algeria (AP) — Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb claimed responsibility Sunday for the attack on a military academy in Algeria that killed at least 18 people including 16 officers in training.
Al-Qaida's North African wing said in a statement posted online that two suicide bombers carried out Friday's attack on the Cherchell military academy, 110 miles (180 kilometers) west of the capital, Algiers.
The defense ministry says the attack killed 16 officers and two civilians, and wounded 26 others. AQIM says it killed 36 officers and wounded 35.
AQMI called the attack "the Eid gift for the Algerian families of the martyrs and the prisoners." Friday was the 27th day of the holy month of Ramadan, a sacred day in the Muslim calendar when the devout say that their prayers go directly to God.
The three-day holiday Eid al-Fitr marks the end of the fasting month of Ramadan this week. Traditionally, children get new clothes, shoes, haircuts and toys for the holiday.
The attacks began Friday evening when a bomb exploded just outside the military academy. Soldiers dining at a restaurant — which was within the base but near its perimeter — raced from their tables to see what had happened, according to security officials.
As a crowd gathered, a suicide bomber with explosives strapped to his body drove his motorcycle at them, the officials said. The city was sealed off after the attack and the army chief of staff, Gen. Gaid Salah, arrived by helicopter shortly after to survey the scene.

"Underlying causes":

Islamist extremists have battled Algerian security forces since 1992 when the army canceled a national election that a now-banned Muslim fundamentalist party was poised to win. Security forces gained the upper hand over the years, but sporadic attacks continue and increased dramatically in July. An estimated 200,000 people — civilians, insurgents and security forces — have been killed since the violence began.
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Zinjibar has now been in jihadist hands since the end of May. "Four Yemeni soldiers killed in clash with 'Qaeda'," from Agence France-Presse, August 28:

Four soldiers were killed and 12 wounded in a a fierce firefight between Yemeni troops and suspected Al-Qaeda gunmen near the southern city of Zinjibar on Sunday, a military official said.
Three gunmen were also killed in the clash, according to a medical source.
The clash erupted at Dofes, a village south of Zinjibar, the provincial capital of Abyan, as troops tried to advance towards the city that has been mostly in the hands of gunmen since late May, the official said.
The four bodies were transferred to a military hospital in Aden, as well as the 12 wounded soldiers, including a colonel, the official said.
A medical source at the hospital said that the bodies of three gunmen killed n the firefight were brought in by the army.
Since the end of May, fighters linked to Al-Qaeda have seized control of several Abyan towns, taking advantage of the weakening of central authority amid nationwide protests against President Ali Abdullah Saleh.
The veteran leader has been recovering in Saudi Arabia for more than two months from bomb blast wounds.
| No Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is yet another example of an oft-repeated phenomenon: whenever there is any problem, declare that it was caused by rebellion from Allah, and that the only remedy is more Islam. This is a recurring feature of Islamic history, and it leads to ever-increasing fanaticism and violence.

"Root cause of ills is deviation from Islam: JI," from The Nation (Pakistan), August 29 (thanks to Twostellas):

LAHORE – Ameer Jamaat-e-Islami Syed Munawar Hasan has said that the root cause of all the ills confronting the country is deviation from Islam, the corrupt rulers and the promotion of evils in the society.

Pakistan had been achieved for building up a model Islamic state for the entire world but the rulers pushed the country in the opposite direction and the whole nation was facing the consequences, he said while addressing the congregation at the Mansoora mosque following the completion of the Holy Quran in Taraweeh.

Syed Munawar Hasan said that Islam is a complete code of life but the Muslims today are facing disgrace and ignominy due to drifting away from the Quran.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad waged by Muslims against other Muslims tends to blow a hole in the usual theories of "underlying causes" for Islamic jihad outside of the imperative to wage jihad against unbelief and impose Sharia. That imperative includes variant Islamic beliefs.

Who is "occupying" whose land here? "Suicide attack kills at least 24 at Baghdad mosque," by Muhanad Mohammed for Reuters, August 28:

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A suicide bomber posing as a beggar detonated his explosives inside a major Baghdad Sunni mosque on Sunday, killing at least 24 people, including an Iraqi lawmaker, just as they finished evening prayers, hospital and local officials said.
The bomber wearing a cast on his arm blew himself up in the main hall of the Umm al-Qura mosque, an important Sunni religious site in Baghdad and one frequented by top Iraqi Sunni leaders in the capital's western Ghazaliya district.
Attacks on Sunni and Shi'ite mosques are especially sensitive in Iraq where a power-sharing government still struggles to overcome the sectarian slaughter that dragged Iraq to the edge of civil war after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.
"The suicide bomber entered pretending he was hurt. He entered the main prayer area. We started to get suspicious. But when the prayers finished, he blew himself up," said Ahmed Abdul Razaq, who was at the mosque.
Violence in Iraq has dropped sharply since the height of sectarian bloodletting four years ago, but both Sunni Islamists linked to al-Qaeda and Shi'ite militias still carry out almost daily attacks as U.S. troops prepare to withdraw at year end.
At Umm al-Qura, the bomber's dismembered remains stayed in the main prayer area and bloody spatters trailed across the mosque carpet where blast victims had been carried outside, a Reuters witness at the site said.
An official at Yarmouk Hospital said at least 24 bodies had been brought there as well as 30 wounded while an interior ministry source put the toll at 28.
A Baghdad security spokesman earlier said at least six people were killed and 12 more were wounded. Iraqi officials often give conflicting estimates of initial bombing death tolls.
None of Iraq's armed groups immediately claimed responsibility, but suicide bombings are usually employed by the local al-Qaeda affiliate Islamic State of Iraq or ISI who officials accuse of trying to foment sectarian tensions to destabilize the government.
Ahmed Adbul Ghafour al-Samarrai, head of the Sunni Endowment which runs Sunni religious sites, told local television from hospital the bomber had been waiting for him. He was slightly wounded.
Iraqi officials say al Qaeda has resurfaced in former strongholds and is still capable of carrying out bolder attacks despite losing top leaders and its geographical reach across Iraq.
Sunday's bombing was the most serious attack since August 15 when a series of suicide bombings, car-bombs and roadside explosives killed at least 70 people across the country. Officials blamed local Iraqi al-Qaeda affiliates....

All of this goes to show celebration over the death of al-Qaeda's most recent second-in-command may be premature.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

namf1.jpg
NAMF.jpg


Doubtless the NAMF is widely reputed to be "moderate." After all, the Ontario government wouldn't play ball with a non-moderate group. And so under the guise of moderation, all kinds of evils are perpetrated. We have seen this before, and recently. Dhimmitude in Ontario: "McGuinty Government Gives $150,000.00 Tax Dollars To Muslim Hate Preachers," from Blazing Cat Fur, August 29 (thanks to Kathy Shaidle):

Politicians will do anything for a vote, including giving $150,000.00 of your money to Muslim Hate Preachers. Following is an excerpt from an e-mail forwarded to my attention in which NAMF - The North American Muslim Foundation brags about their score. The jpeg [above] has the entire announcement.
"The North American Muslim Foundation is honored to be a recipient of the 2011/2012 Ontario Trillium Foundation – Community Capital Fund. The North American Muslim Foundation is grateful to be able to lead the community in providing accessible and inclusive programs and services within the province of Ontario. NAMF serves as a principal example in the area of regional education and development. NAMF has been granted $150,000 to renovate our 6478 square-foot Gym area in order to create a recreational centre that will provide fitness and wellness services to all people within the community. The state-of-the art recreational centre will be open to help residents lead healthy active lives. A culturally-sensitive space will be created to increase the overall well being of the people of all ages and abilities, through physical and mental stimulation. As a result of this gym, active living will be emphasized and exposed to several demographics which have no/limited access to appropriate information and knowledge. We are thankful to the Ontario Trillium Foundation for recognizing our efforts and providing us with assistance in helping to make a difference in the lives of many."

A culturally sensitive space huh? Well if by culturally sensitive you mean killing Gays, woman and children etc, then yea sure. Have a look at NAMF's culturally sensitive lecture series.

NAMF - the North American Muslim Foundation is located in Toronto. Recently they hosted an Iftar & Lecture series during Ramadan. NAMF has been an outspoken proponent of the Toronto District School Board's "Islam First" mosqueteria policy.

Among the Honoured Speakers at NAMF's lecture series was Abdullah Hakim Quick a radical Islamist noted for such gems of interfaith dialogue as:

"They said, "what is the Islamic position on "homosexuality"? And I told them: Put my name in the paper. The punishment is death. And I'm not going to change this religion "

and...Jews, gays and kaffirs are “filth” says fanatical cleric.

This is rich: Dr Quick has served as a special advisor to the Toronto Board of Education h/t Munimula

Who else was on the speakers list? Why Dr. Arafat Al-Ashi, former head of the Muslim World League in Canada, and a cleric so twisted he believes Jews are racist even in the afterlife:

"In the scriptures of Jews we notice that the concept of life after death is a vague one. It is, in fact, a materialistic concept, and it is also a racist one. For Jews God is a pro-Jewish Lord. He gives them the right to crush and eliminate all other nations who are called Goyim (non-Jews). These people do not deserve to be human and naturally do not qualify to enter Heaven. It is a concept of bias, hatred and racism."...

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Raufbookpage.jpg


Yesterday I posted here about the Ground Zero Mosque Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf's appearance in Scotland, where he said this:

Rauf points out that “the only truly clashing area is the penal code, and no Muslim has the intention of introducing that to America. The penal code is the area that people in the Western world are worried about – but these are things that aren’t even observed today in most of the Muslim world. Apart from the Taliban and a few places like that, where do you see this happening?”.

I pointed out in yesterday's post that "if Muslims believe that the Sharia, including its penal code, is Allah's perfect and immutable law, why wouldn't they want to bring it to America and Europe?" And here's a big surprise: Rauf thinks the same way. He completely contradicted his statement above in his 2000 book Islam: A Sacred Law. Jihad Watch reader Kamala points out that in that book, he wrote this on page 58: "And since a Shari'ah is understood as a law with God at its center, it is not possible in principle to limit the Shari'ah to some aspects of human life and leave out others."

He is a smooth, slick liar, and he has deceived the government and media elites. But it is clear to an increasing number of people what his agenda really is.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Recognition of the State of Israel has always been one of the stated conditions of the United States for any accord with Israel. Israel has been pressed again and again to make concessions, and has made them, in exchange for empty promises and the hope of this recognition. Even Obama, when he called for the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state, called on the Palestinians to recognize Israel. However, given the history here, it is likely that a Palestinian state will be declared and recognized by the world even as they continue to deny Israel's right to exist.

"Abbas: We won't recognize Israel as Jewish state," by Elior Levy for Ynet News, August 28 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

The Palestinian Authority will not be recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas said Saturday, adopting a belligerent tone ahead of his planned statehood bid in September.

The Palestinian leader also criticized demands made by the International Quartet of his Authority, urging the international community to back off.

The Palestinian leader also criticized demands made by the International Quartet of his Authority, urging the international community to back off. "Don't order us to recognize a Jewish state," Abbas said. "We won't accept it."

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is one way Belgium is "building bridges" with its Muslim population. "NGO Monitor slams Belgium funds for ‘anti-Israel’ group," by Benjamin Weinthal for the Jerusalem Post, August 14 (thanks to Tanguy Veys):

BERLIN – The Jerusalem-based watchdog organization NGO Monitor has issued a report alleging that Belgium taxpayer funds are being used to finance ‘anti- Israel’ NGOs, including lawsuits against Israeli officials.

According to the newly released NGO Monitor report on Belgium, the Federal Public Service, an intermediary governmental agency in Belgium, provided payments in 2010 to “political advocacy NGOs that claim a human rights mandate, such as Yesh Din, Public Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI), and Combatants for Peace (CFP).”

“The transfer of over 800,000 euros in the past three years from Belgian taxpayers to opposition groups, under the façade of promoting peace and human rights, adds to the resentment of many Israelis, including Knesset members.

Many criticize this as manipulative and anti-democratic,” Prof. Gerald Steinberg, the president of NGO Monitor, told the Jerusalem Post.

NGO Monitor charged that Yesh Din – Volunteers for Human Rights used funds to initiate litigation against Israeli officials because of alleged human rights abuses.

The use of foreign money to influence Israel’s political and judicial systems has been the source of a heated debate in the Knesset, including bills designed to promote transparency among foreign funding of NGOs in Israel.

Asked about Belgium’s role in financing Israeli NGOs, Michel Malherbe, a spokesman for the Belgium Foreign Ministry, told the Post, “Belgium does not fund NGOs. We fund specific activities and examine the track record of the execution organization on a number of criteria. Respect for human rights is a major one.

“The project executed by Yesh Din does not include legal action against Israeli officials. It does include filing petitions based on the Israeli Freedom of Information Act.”

According to Yesh Din’s website, the NGO “is an Israeli human rights organization working to achieve long-term structural improvement in the human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

We are an independent nongovernmental organization, supported by donations from individuals and institutional donors.”

In an e-mail to the Post on Saturday, Hila Aloni, a representative from Yesh Din, denied that the organization files law suits against Israeli officials.

“As a human rights organization, Yesh Din promotes accountability by the Israeli government, and demands it to do its job of proper law enforcement in the occupied territories, according to both Israeli and international law.

We do not file suits against Israeli officials, but assist Palestinians to petition the Israeli justice system to challenge allegedly illegal or unjust actions taken by Israeli authorities. All of our financial information is completely public and transparent, unlike pro-occupation organizations that do not reveal their funding sources,” Aloni wrote.

For Yesh Din, “A sum of 80,000 EUR has been approved by the Belgians this year, although the money hasn’t been received yet,” she added....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Allah is greatest," he shouted. Sure, nothing shows the world your utter moral superiority like ramming people with your cab and then stabbing them. "Israeli police: 7 wounded in Palestinian attack," from the Associated Press, August 28:

JERUSALEM (AP) — A Palestinian attacker wounded seven Israelis near a Tel Aviv nightclub early Monday, hitting a police checkpoint with a stolen taxi and then stabbing others, police said.
The attacker was a Palestinian in his twenties from the city of Nablus, according to Israeli police spokeswoman Luba Samri.
Just before 2 a.m., the attacker stole a taxi in south Tel Aviv and then drove into a police checkpoint securing the street near a popular nightclub, she said.
He then got out of the car and stabbed passers-by, she said, while shouting "Allahu akbar" — Arabic for "God is great," a phrase often used as a battle-cry by Islamic militants.
The wounded included four policemen and three civilians, Samri said.
The attacker was arrested. He was injured and was taken to a hospital.
No further details were immediately available.
Such attacks inside Israel, once common, have fallen off in recent years as Israeli and Palestinian forces have restored security in the adjacent Palestinian territory of the West Bank. But some violence has continued. One Israeli was killed in a similar attack with a vehicle in Tel Aviv in May.
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 28, 2011

There's been no shortage of favorable coverage of the Libyan rebels in the Western media, declaring their boundless love for 'freedom'. Of course, there's no denying that Libya's now fugitive 'brotherly leader' Gadhafi, i.e. 'Col. Daffy', i.e. the 'Duck of Death', was an erratic and sadistic megalomaniac. But now that the proverbial devil that we knew has gone underground, what will replace him? With Tripoli and most of Libya having been 'liberated', can we expect Jeffersonian democracy to rise up from the ashes? We've already run several pieces here at Jihad Watch on why the outside world should take promises of freedom and democracy from Libya's new government with (at the very least) a healthy degree of skepticism.

Now comes word that the Lockerbie bomber -- Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the only man ever convicted of the 1988 Pan Am 103 bombing, which killed 270 people -- who has been comfortably ensconced in one of Tripoli's richest neighborhoods, isn't going to be extradited anywhere. "Libyan rebels won't deport Lockerbie bomber", MSNBC, 28 August 2011:
TRIPOLI, Libya— The Libyan rebels' interim government says it will not deport the man convicted of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing, who is reportedly near death.

The rebel Justice Minister Mohammed al-Alagi told journalists in Tripoli Sunday that no Libyan citizen would be deported, even Abdel-Baset al-Megrahi, who was convicted in a Scottish court and imprisoned for the bombing of Pan Am flight 103, which killed 270 people.

The Scottish government released al-Megrahi in 2009, believing he would soon die of cancer. He was greeted as a hero in his native Libya and met with then-leader Moammar Gadhafi.

CNN reported Sunday that al-Megrahi is comatose and near death, under the care of his family at a villa in Tripoli.

"We just give him oxygen. Nobody gives us any advice," his son, Khaled Elmegarhi, told CNN.

It's likely that he'll take the secrets of the Pam Am bombing to his grave, according to CNN.

Neighbors of al-Megrahi described him as a wealthy recluse, constantly surrounded by security guards.

After his release, he was received with a hero's welcome on his return to Tripoli, and the televised images of cheering crowds angered many relatives of the 270 people killed in the attack, 189 of whom were Americans.

The Obama administration harshly criticized Scotland's decision to release Megrahi and many U.S. politicians and victims' families have pressed for his extradition to the United States.

One of Megrahi's neighbors said he had been whisked away by security guards last week when Tripoli fell to rebels battling forces loyal to Gadhafi, who like Megrahi, has gone into hiding. Libya's new government is likely to come under pressure to find Megrahi and hand him over.

"The day Tripoli fell, four security men, his private security, took him, his wife and his sons and left. They left in a Mercedes," said Ahmed Mlaaty, 20, a student and one of Megrahi's neighbours, standing outside his handsome villa.

As a condition of his release, Megrahi had been obliged to check in regularly with Scottish authorities, who said last week they had lost contact with him in the "dust of battle."

Lost contact? I'm sure the Scottish authorities didn't see that coming.

Another neighbor said Megrahi caused no one any harm, and said his complicity in the bombing had not been proved.

"Everyone associates him with Lockerbie, but I'm not sure he was involved," said Noora Abdul Hadi, 27, a doctor.

Attiya al-Usta, 77, said he had seen Megrahi just before the February uprising against Gadhafi's 42-year-rule.

"When he came back from Europe he looked ill. But recently he looked fit and neat. I saw him just before the revolution. He didn't look ill at all. He was sitting in a chair on his balcony. He looked 100 percent."

As the founder of Islam taught his followers, warfare is deceit.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More smooth deceptions, and some surprisingly revealing pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist statements, from the Islamic supremacist imam behind the Ground Zero Mosque. "Ground Zero imam gives Scotland his recipe for successful multiculturalism," by Vicky Allan for the Sunday Herald, August 28 (thanks to Ron):

AMERICA’S most controversial imam – the man at the centre of the storm over plans for the “Ground Zero Mosque” in New York last year – flew into Edinburgh yesterday to tell the Festival of Spirituality and Peace that greater integration between Islam and the West depends on the incorporation of Sharia law into the legal systems of the UK and the United States as well as Muslims adopting the culture of their host countries.

Many see Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf as an Islamic moderate even though he has been vilified in the US press as an apologist for radical Muslims. In an interview with the Sunday Herald, Rauf said he believes the world is in the grip of a “dangerous myth” and “self-fulfilling prophecy” that “Islam and the West are at war. But the real battleground is not between Islam and the West, but between the wise, fair-minded people of all faith traditions and the extremists.”

Although he is a pro-US imam who has argued that America is the embodiment of Islam’s ideal society, Rauf became a hate figure in the US over the so-called Ground Zero Mosque. The plan offended relatives of the victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and led to a US pastor proposing a “Burn a Koran day”.

He's a "pro-US imam" who blamed 9/11 on the U.S. and said that Osama bin Laden was "made in the USA."

Rauf says that when the project – a community centre containing a mosque – was announced on the front page of the New York Times [in December 2009] there was no reaction. But six months later, it was picked up by conservatives like Sarah Palin and became one of the most divisive subjects in US society. Rauf later said: “If I had known this would happen, cause this kind of pain, I wouldn’t have done it.”...

Then stop it now. Join us at our 9/11 Freedom Rally at Ground Zero and announce that you're definitively abandoning the project.

An essential element of this interweaving of cultures, he says, will have to be the incorporation of Sharia law into the legal systems of Europe and the US. In this, he is in agreement with the Archbishop of Canterbury who said that the adoption of some aspects of Sharia law “seems to be unavoidable”.

Rauf points out that “the only truly clashing area is the penal code, and no Muslim has the intention of introducing that to America. The penal code is the area that people in the Western world are worried about – but these are things that aren’t even observed today in most of the Muslim world. Apart from the Taliban and a few places like that, where do you see this happening?”.

Hani Ramadan, Tariq Ramadan's brother, called for the stoning of adulterers in Paris a few years back. If Muslims believe that the Sharia, including its penal code, is Allah's perfect and immutable law, why wouldn't they want to bring it to America and Europe? Rauf does not and cannot point to a form of Sharia that does not contain the mandates for stoning, amputation, etc. So how firm and honest can his assurance that Muslims have no intention of bringing all that here really be? We're already seeing honor killings and female genital mutilation in America. Why shouldn't the rest follow when all of this is justified by Sharia?

In the UK, he says, we need to recognise that the radicalisation of Muslim youth is not a problem of religion. “You have to consider how we would approach it if these people were not Muslims, but were Christian, for instance. The source of the problem is not religion, but an economic one.”

That idea has been debunked in study after study. But if enough easy marks believe Rauf, the Muslim communities in the UK will pick up some more jizya.

Another myth which Rauf tries to counter is the idea that Islam is at odds with Western concepts of gender equality. “Look around the world, and you see six or seven predominantly Muslim countries that have had heads of governments and heads of state who were women. Glass ceilings have already been broken for many countries in the Muslim world.”

Yes, that certainly proves that women have equal rights in Muslim societies!

The rise of the extreme right in Europe is something he perceives as a “reaction of fear to a threat of the loss of identity”. He says: “What it means to be Dutch, or what it meant to be British, in terms of ethnicity or language, is undergoing a shift.” The tensions this provokes have to be “addressed by both the host community and the immigrant community ... We need to develop a local Muslim culture. Dutch Muslims have to become increasingly Dutch. The same for British Muslims. We should dress like the people of our country.”...

Cut out the jihad terror plots? Not a word about that. Dress like the natives? Yeah, that'll fix everything.

Rauf supported the decision by Edinburgh City Council to ban the far-right Scottish Defence League from marching on the eve of the 10th anniversary of September 11, 2001 amid safety fears.

He also supported the Scottish Government’s decision to release the Lockerbie bomber....

What a surprise.

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In this post I included numerous links to the Rick Perry/Aga Khan Islamic curriculum for Texas public schools. The links were to the Google cache of the curriculum material, because several days ago, after we began calling attention to it, the curriculum was taken offline. Accordingly I wrote in that post:

One very odd thing about the Aga Khan/Perry curriculum: since this whole brouhaha started, it has been taken offline. It is now available only in cached form here. Why was it taken down? Was the Perry camp embarrassed by the material that Pamela Geller published here, showing it to be a whitewash of Islamic teaching and history? Or was it taken down because it really is, as Ace says, so "biased against Muslims it will reinforce perceptions [Perry] is some kind of rootin'-tootin' six-gun shooting cowboy yahoo"?

Is either option favorable to Perry? If it was taken down because it's a dhimmi whitewash, Perry is tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right, and those evaluating Perry should be concerned about his naivete in dealing with the Aga Khan. If it was taken down because it was too honest about Islam and will thus hurt Perry with the dhimmi/Norquist faction of the GOP, Perry is again tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right: he is not able or willing to stand up to Norquist and his Islamic supremacist allies. So which is it? What are they hiding? And does it matter? Either way, the deep-sixing of the curriculum proves that we were right about Perry all along.

Now that impression is compounded by the fact that even the cached links no longer work: the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum has been completely wiped from the web. Pamela Geller has screenshots here, however.

I suspect that the curriculum has been taken down because it is a whitewash of Islamic texts, teachings and history. After all, as I showed here, it relies on compromised "authorities" such as Carl Ernst, John Esposito, and Michael Sells, among others. The apologists for Perry have not explained and cannot explain why, if this curriculum is as innocuous or even as Islamorealistic as they claim, it has been wiped from the web. What is the Perry camp hiding? And why?

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I'm tired of the Rick Perry firestorm. Time for a Ron Paul firestorm. Another Clueless Presidential Candidate Alert: "Ron Paul says U.S. intervention motivated 9/11 attacks," by Josh Hafner for the Des Moines Register, August 27:

WINTERSET, Ia. – Two weeks away from the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, presidential candidate and Texas Rep. Ron Paul says that U.S. intervention in the Middle East is a main motivation behind terrorist hostilities toward America, and that Islam is not a threat to the nation.

At a campaign stop on Saturday in Winterset, one man asked Paul how terrorist groups would react if the U.S. removed its military presence in Middle Eastern nations, a move the candidate advocates.

“Which enemy are you worried that will attack our national security?” Paul asked.

“If you’re looking for specifics, I’m talking about Islam. Radical Islam,” the man answered.

“I don’t see Islam as our enemy,” Paul said. “I see that motivation is occupation and those who hate us and would like to kill us, they are motivated by our invasion of their land, the support of their dictators that they hate.”

Yes. When Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said, “Have no doubt... Allah willing, Islam will conquer what? It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world,” he was just upset about the U.S. invasion of Iran. When CAIR cofounder and longtime Board chairman Omar Ahmad said in southern California that “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth” (he now denies saying this, but the original reporter sticks by her story), he was just angry about the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. When the prominent American Muslim leader Siraj Wahhaj said, “if only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate,” he was upset about the U.S. invasion of Dearborn, Michigan. When the most influential Islamic cleric in the world today, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, said that “Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice,” he was upset about the U.S. invasion of Malmö, Sweden.

Regarding 9/11, Paul said that attacks against the U.S. from Middle Eastern groups at home and abroad can be traced to the foreign presence of U.S. troops, as well as America’s relationships with dictator regimes.

Paul referred to a military base in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, as a key motivator in the Sept. 11th attacks. Osama bin Laden viewed it as an American desecration of holy land.

“After 9/11, (people said) ‘Oh yeah, it’s those very bad people who hate us,’ but 15 of (the hijackers) came from Saudi Arabia,” said Paul. “One of the reasons they attacked us, is we propped up this Sharia government and the fundamentalists hated us for it.”

Paul is totally clueless. They attacked us because we were propping up a "Sharia government" and "the fundamentalists hated us for it"? Since when do Islamic "fundamentalists" disapprove of Sharia governments? They attacked us, according to Osama bin Laden, because, among other reasons, we were in his view "prevent[ing] our people from establishing the Islamic Shariah," not propping up a Sharia state.

The congressman particularly decried U.S.-led bombings in foreign nations, saying that “almost always those individuals that they are trying to kill did not have any direct relationship” with threats to the U.S.

Accordingly, his expectations for the rebels in Libya, who were assisted by American-led bombing efforts, aren’t very bright.

“Remember ‘Mission Accomplished’? That’s probably about where we are right now,” Paul told The Des Moines Register, “and (the U.S.) better be very cautious about bragging about anything.”

The crumbling of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s regime wouldn’t amount to a significant victory because al-Qaeda forces would arise there soon, Paul said.

He is certainly right about that.

“As bad as Gadaffi was, he didn’t like the al-Qaeda,” Paul said. “He kicked those people out.”

Paul cited a University of Chicago professor, Robert Pape, whose research argues that most of the suicide terrorism in the past 30 years was caused by military occupation. Pape’s research, funded by the Defense Department, shows that suicide bombings in Afghanistan went up one third after the Obama administration surged 30,000 troops into the country.

Not only is Pape wrong; he's on the dole of Hamas-linked CAIR.

“(9/11) was one of the main motivations for getting your attention on why they hate us and want to kill us,” he said. “You could send 20 million people over there and all it would do is make our problems worse.”

That last part, about sending 20 million people over there and all it would do would be to make our problems worse, is certainly true.

| 137 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The new European Islam-based antisemitism asserts itself in the home of the old European National Socialist antisemitism. "Islamists hold anti-Israel march in Berlin," by Assaf Uni for Ynet News, August 28 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Muslim hatred in heart of Europe: More than 1,000 Muslims marched Saturday in Berlin and chanted anti-Israel slogans to mark al-Quds Day, set by Iran following the Islamist revolution in the country.

The protestors in the anti-Israel rally were faced by hundreds of Israel fans who also arrived at the site.

Police in the German capital deployed in force to separate the two camps and prevent violent clashes.

The Islamic march was led by Iranian clerics, accompanied by anti-Zionist Neturei Karta Jews living in Europe.

"What's taking place in Israel is a Shoah for the Palestinians," one of the radical ultra-Orthodox Jews, Rabbi Beck, told Ynet. "We are waiting for the day Zionism collapses, and then Jews and Muslims would be able to live side by side in peace."

Sure, as long as the Jews know their place (cf. Qur'an 9:29).

While the rabbi spoke, protestors behind him were chanting "Allahu Akbar" and "Israel is a terrorist."

The rabbi has covered himself with shame.

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mohammed was "pissed off" at his classmates who were proud their parents worked for the National Security Agency and FBI. And so he spoke openly of his desire to kill them.

The system worked in efforts to stop him, thanks in large part to a tip to the FBI from The Jawa Report. After Columbine, there is no such thing as "just kidding" about school shootings, just as there is no such thing for jokes about bombs in the TSA screening line at the airport. But Mohammed K.'s family expects him to be an exception, claiming he is the victim.

"Teen tied to Jihad Jane allegedly plotted school shooting," by John Shiffman for the Philadelphia Inquirer, August 27:

The Maryland teenager secretly arrested by the FBI for allegedly conspiring with the woman from the Philadelphia suburbs known as Jihad Jane also spoke of a Columbine-style plot with a Pittsburgh-area friend in a jihadist chat room, according to sources and documents.

Disturbing on so many levels:

"I had a lot of thoughts about you today," Mohammed K. wrote to his Western Pennsylvania pen pal late last year. "About us both doing martyrdom operations together in my school. . . . It was like we both were in a big truck and had guns and we were shooting randomly at a huge crowd of kids."
The chats provide new insight into a boy who at age 15 allegedly began helping Colleen LaRose, aka "Jihad Jane," the 48-year-old Pennsburg woman who U.S. officials say represents a disturbing new face of homegrown terrorism.
Mohammed K. was 17 and a high school senior in Ellicott City, Md., when he allegedly wrote those threatening words. The Inquirer is not publishing his last name because he is a juvenile.
Mohammed's chat room friend was Emerson Begolly, a Pennsylvania State University student who was soon charged with soliciting unrelated terror attacks. Transcripts of the chats were publicly filed in that case.
During the Nov. 22, 2010, chat, Mohammed told Begolly he lived near National Security Agency headquarters in Fort Meade, Md.
"The place where I live is a HOTBED of NSA and all the security agencies of Amrika (sic)," Mohammed wrote. "And the kids who study in my school proudly state that their parents work in NSA and FBI, and even carry key chains - piss me off."
"Like Columbine?" Begolly asked.
"Na'am, lol" Mohammed wrote, using the Arabic word for "yes" and Internet slang for "laughing out loud."
It could not be determined Saturday whether the authorities took any immediate action based on the threatening remarks, which were reported to the FBI by the anti-jihadist group MyPetJawa.

Well done!

Neither Jeffrey Lindy, the Philadelphia lawyer representing Mohammed K., nor FBI spokesman J.J. Klaver would comment. Police and school officials in Howard County, Md., could not be reached.
Juvenile cases in federal court are rare, and terror cases rarer still. Federal law prohibits government officials from discussing them.
In February, LaRose pleaded guilty to terror-conspiracy charges as part of a failed plot to kill a Swedish artist whose cartoon of the prophet Muhammad with a dog's head had insulted many Muslims.

Whose prophet?

Seven alleged coconspirators were arrested in Ireland, and Jamie Pauline Ramirez of Leadville, Colo., has pleaded guilty in Philadelphia to providing support to terrorists.
The LaRose indictment does not cite Mohammed by name, but uses a code name to allege that he helped her raise money and recruit others for a jihad.
According to another court document, LaRose sent Mohammed her boyfriend's U.S. passport, which she had stolen for the jihad plot. Mohammed hid it at school.
After LaRose's arrest, Mohammed was repeatedly questioned by the FBI but not arrested until July. His detention was first made public Friday by The Inquirer.

Claiming victim status:

Relatives say the teenager was duped twice - first by LaRose and then by FBI agents. They said the FBI questioned Mohammed at least eight times without a lawyer or parent present. The boy's parents, recent immigrants from Pakistan who do not speak much English, gave permission for him to meet with the agents, but relatives now say the parents did not understand the consequences.
"He is innocent," a relative told The Inquirer last week. "He is not a criminal. Bad people on the Internet changed his mind."
The family, which lives in a modest apartment west of Baltimore, emigrated to give their four children a better education. Like his siblings, Mohammed excelled in school, winning scholarships based on his creative-writing skills, and was accepted to Johns Hopkins University.
"I really think he thought this was fantasy," a relative said. "He didn't actually do anything or hurt anybody."
His parents had chastised him for spending too much time online, worrying that he was distracted from his studies.
Mohammed appeared to allude to that during the Nov. 22 chat with Begolly, a 22-year-old former neo-Nazi who had become a jihadist....
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wondering what's with all the over-the-top rhetoric against Israel here of late? Friday was Quds Day, the day Jew-hating jihadists and their sympathizers call in feeling genocidal and take the day off to agitate against the Jewish state. Here are but two nuggets from the annual festivities.

First, from the helmet-haired helmsman in Tehran: "Iran's Ahmadinejad: No Place for Israel in Region," from Fox News, August 26:

TEHRAN, Iran – The Iranian president said on Friday there will be no room for Israel in the region after the formation of a Palestinian state, and that once the state is established, the liberation of all Palestinian lands should follow.

So the entire area can be an ungovernable disaster.

The comments by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reflected his typical anti-Israeli rhetoric, which has drawn international condemnation since he first said in 2005 that Israel should be "wiped off the map."
Ahmadinejad spoke at a Tehran ceremony following nationwide pro-Palestinian rallies marking Quds Day. Quds is the Arabic word for Jerusalem. The annual demonstration is an occasion for Iranian officials to show off their support for Palestinians and condemn archenemy Israel.
The remarks come as the Palestinians are pushing this year to achieve recognition at the United Nations during the General Assembly meeting in September. The statehood bid comes amid stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations and although the U.N. vote in New York will be largely symbolic, the Palestinians believe it will send a powerful message to Israel.
"Do not assume you will be boosted with a (U.N.) recognition of a Palestinian state," Ahmadinejad said, addressing Israel. "There is no room for you in the region."
"Recognition of a Palestinian state is the first step in the liberation of the entire Palestine," he added.

The foreign minister joins in: "Minister: Int'l Quds Day Rallies Echo Crush of Zionists' Bones," from Fars News Agency, August 26:

TEHRAN (FNA)- The International Quds Days rallies mean crushed bones for the Zionist regime, Iranian Intelligence Minister Heidar Moslehi stressed.
Iranians across the country, including in the capital Tehran, alongside other people around the world held massive anti-Israel rallies on the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan in opposition to the continued occupation of Palestinian land by Israel.
Speaking to FNA about the Quds Day, Moslehi asserted that one of the manifestations of the Islamic Awakening is attention to the issue of Palestine and al-Quds.
"The Islamic communities should translate into practice the issue of Palestine and the rescue of the people of this country from Zionist hands," the minister added.
The International Quds Day was started by the late Founder of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini, in 1979 as a way of expressing solidarity with the Palestinians and underscoring importance of the holy Quds to Muslims.
International Quds Day is an annual event opposing Israel's occupation of Beitul-Muqaddas. Anti-Zionist rallies and demonstrations are held on the last Friday of Ramadan in Muslim and Arab countries around the world, and especially in Iran.
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The world is left to hold its breath and cross its fingers that this group will somehow pull a tolerant, stable, pluralistic democracy that respects civil liberties and human rights out of its hat. They may pull off an election, but a democracy is only as good as the values that inform its participants. And where Sharia is enshrined in the draft constitution as the highest law of the land, there is that much more reason for skepticism. "RPT-Senior Islamist rebel is veteran Gaddafi foe," by William MacLean for Reuters, August 27:

LONDON, Aug 26 (Reuters) - A senior Islamist rebel reported to have helped depose Muammar Gaddafi is a skilled guerrilla leader and veteran dissident who led a failed revolt in Libya in the 1990s and once spent time with al Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan, security experts say.
Abdel Hakim Belhadj, reported by Arab media to have been prominent in the assault on Tripoli, helps lead an Islamist group that has fought in close cooperation with the main rebel National Transitional Council (NTC), analysts say.
The Libyan Islamic Movement for Change (Al-Haraka Al-Islamiya Al Libiya Lit-Tahghir), is made up of former members of the now defunct Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) that once plotted against Gaddafi from Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.
Belhadj, in his late 40s and also known as Abu Abdullah al-Sadeq, is a highly skilled leader, said Noman Benotman, a former associate and fellow LIFG commander.
Benotman said he was concerned that some Western officials would seize on his presence in Tripoli to try to argue that militant Islamists were about to try to hijack the revolution.
In fact, Belhaj was capable of seeing the importance of suppporting the NTC, he said.
"The burden on him now must be very great. I hope and believe he is capable of taking very wise decisions and analysing correctly the struggle he has recently waged."
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the NTC on Thursday that one of its commitments was now to take "a firm stand against violent extremism", a remark seen by some analysts as a reference to Islamist fighters in its ranks. [...]
Belhadj, in common with many Arab dissidents who sought refuge in 1990s Afghanistan, had dealings with Osama bin Laden there, but opposed al Qaeda's transnational anti-Western campaign including its Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, Benotman said.
Instead, Belhadj spent his time in Afghanistan trying to rebuild LIFG networks back inside Libya in its campaign to replace Gaddafi with an Islamic state, Benotman said.

Hoping for jihadists-turned-pragmatists, who will also use that pragmatism to build a modern state:

"He has more of a political mindset than a religious mindset," he said. "He always managed to keep a distance between bin Laden and our struggle (in Libya)."
Camille Tawil, a historian of North African Islamist militancy, has said Belhadj sought refuge in Afghanistan in 1999 after Gaddafi's security men had decimated LIFG networks.
The LIFG was careful not to emulate al Qaeda's practice of acting as a "state within a state" in Afghanistan -- a criticism often levelled privately against bin Laden by supporters of the ruling Taliban at that time, he wrote in a Jan 9, 2009 briefing for the Jamestown Foundation think-tank.
When al Qaeda in 2007 announced a merger with the LIFG, Belhadj and his fellow leaders -- by then in Libyan prisons -- rejected the move and in 2009 publicly renounced violence.

Sharia imposed by any means is still Sharia.

In an Aug. 3 briefing paper published by the British Quilliam think tank where he now works, Benotman said al Qaeda-style global jihadists were present in the rebellion but they were a minority.

A Tiny Minority of Extremists?

In contrast, Belhadj's Libyan Islamic Movement for Change accepted the idea of a new democratic Libya and "they have made it clear they will engage in and participate in any political process in the post-Gaddafi era.

Once again: a democracy is only as good as the values that inform its participants.

"Because they accept the democratic system they cannot be considered 'jihadists' in the international understanding of the term. They are also opposed to more extreme jihadists such as those from al Qaeda," he said.

He's gaining "moderate" credentials, because he's not as bad as the next guy.

After the U.S-led invasion of Afghanistan, Belhadj fled to Iran and later south-east Asia where he is believed to have been arrested. He was handed over to Libya in 2004 in circumstances that remain unclear.
Under a programme of political reconciliation promoted by Gaddafi's son Saif al-Islam, Belhadj and other imprisoned LIFG leaders began talks with the government in 2007 that led to the release from prison of hundreds of LIFG members and other Islamists. Belhadj himself was freed on March 23, 2010.
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Back when bin Laden was on dry land, it was al-Qaeda's "number-three" operatives who seemed to be reported as struck down with a regularity surpassed only by the hapless, unnamed "red shirt" characters in vintage Star Trek episodes, as more than a few online commentators have also noted. That distinction may now fall to the No. 2 position. "Al-Qaida's No. 2 reported killed by US in Pakistan," by Matt Apuzzo for the Associated Press, August 27:

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. and Pakistani officials said Saturday that al-Qaida's second-in-command, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, has been killed in Pakistan, delivering another big blow to a terrorist group that the U.S. believes to be on the verge of defeat.
Al-Rahman was killed Monday in the lawless Pakistani tribal region of Waziristan, according to a senior administration official who insisted on anonymity to discuss intelligence issues.
A Pakistani intelligence official said al-Rahman died in a U.S. missile strike in Machi Khel village in North Waziristan on Monday.
Since Navy SEALs stormed Osama bin Laden's compound and killed him in May, the Obama administration has been unusually frank in its assessment that al-Qaida is on the ropes, its leadership in disarray. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last month that al-Qaida's defeat was within reach if the U.S. could mount a string of successful attacks.
"Now is the moment, following what happened with bin Laden, to put maximum pressure on them," Panetta said, "because I do believe that if we continue this effort we can really cripple al-Qaida as a major threat."
A Libyan national, al-Rahman never had the worldwide name recognition of bin Laden or bin Laden's successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri. But al-Rahman was regarded as an instrumental figure in the terrorist organization, trusted by bin Laden to oversee al-Qaida's daily operations.
When the SEALs raided bin Laden's compound, they found evidence of al-Rahman's deep involvement in running al-Qaida.
Senior al-Qaida figures have been killed before, only to be replaced. But the Obama administration's tenor reflects a cautious optimism that victory in the decade-long fight against al-Qaida could be at hand.
"It does hold the prospect of a strategic defeat, if you will, a strategic dismantling, of al-Qaida," incoming CIA Director David Petraeus said in July.
Since bin Laden's death, counterterrorism officials have hoped to capitalize on al-Qaida's unsettled leadership. The more uncertain the structure, the harder it is for al-Qaida to operate covertly and plan attacks.
Al-Zawahiri is running the group but is considered a divisive figure who lacks the founder's charisma and ability to galvanize al-Qaida's disparate franchises....
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When the shoe is on the other foot and jihadists are coming over the border into Pakistan, it's an outrage. We have wondered before how many involved in past raids of this nature were Pakistani Taliban.

This time, Pakistan itself believes the organizers of the raid did originate on the Pakistani side, but the Pakistani military is nonetheless seizing the opportunity to accuse the NATO and Afghanistan of culpable negligence.

It's a little like letting your dog go on the neighbor's lawn and complaining to him when the odor blows back over the fence. "Pakistan chides Afghanistan over border raid," from Agence France-Presse, August 27:

Pakistan lodged a protest with Afghanistan over a brazen cross-border attack on Saturday by hundreds of Taliban fighters that killed 25 Pakistani troops, the foreign ministry said.
The Pakistani military blamed what it claimed was inaction by Afghanistan and NATO in the latest flaring of tensions between the neighbours.
"The Afghan charge d'affairs was called in today at the foreign ministry to lodge a protest on attacks from Kunar and Nuristan," foreign office spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua said in a statement.
"The Afghan charge d'affairs was conveyed the imperative of establishing peace and tranquility in the border region and effectively dealing with terrorists.
"The activities of the terrorists are a matter of great concern to both the governments and peoples of Pakistan and Afghanistan. They cannot be allowed to continue such blatant attacks from across the border."
Between 200 and 300 "terrorists" based in Afghanistan attacked seven paramilitary Frontier Corps checkposts in the northwestern Pakistani district of Chitral early Saturday morning, Pakistan's military said in a statement.
The term "terrorists" is frequently used by the military for Taliban and Al-Qaeda-linked militants. The military said both Pakistani and Afghan fighters were involved.
"At least 25 security forces personnel embraced shahadat (martyrdom) in the attack," the statement said.
About 20 of the militants were believed to have been killed. The border posts were overrun by militants, but reinforcements were later sent, it said.
The Pakistani military said that those believed to have co-ordinated the raid -- including a radical cleric from the Swat valley, Maulanah Fazlullah -- had previously fled into Afghanistan in the face of Pakistani military offensives.
"Since their expulsion from their native areas, the terrorists have organised themselves in Kunar and Nuristan provinces with the support of local Afghan authorities," the military's statement said.
It said the "scanty presence of NATO and ANA (Afghan National Army) forces" along the border had led to "safe havens" for militants on the Afghan side, allowing them to launch attacks in Pakistan.
Intelligence about the presence of Pakistani militants and their Afghan supporters had been passed to NATO and Afghan authorities, the statement said....
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 27, 2011

Pamela Geller and I are catching hell all over for criticizing the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum about Islam in Texas schools, but here's the thing: the material that David Stein and the Ace of Spades blog are quoting as the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum is not actually part of the curriculum at all.

Ace of Spades is one of those juvenile, leering fratboy blogs that has never appealed to me. The first time this was sent to me, I took a look, saw how inaccurate, fact-free, and contemptuous (to say nothing of contemptible) the presentation was, and hadn't intended to reply. Ace can't even spell Pamela Geller's name right. But as the strange attempt to shut down all skepticism about Rick Perry continues, and people keep sending Ace's post to me, and pointing out that it is being picked up all over, so here goes. And Pamela Geller smacks down Ace here. "So.... Yeah... The New Smear Is That Rick Perry Is a Dhimmi, Huh?," from Ace of Spades, August 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Pam Gellar [sic], relying on a hot tip from, um, Salon, thinks Rick Perry's a dhimmi.

Salon did report on Perry's connection to the Aga Khan. But the Perry bots keep breathlessly repeating that "Geller relied on Salon!" as if Salon's hard-Left pseudo-journalist Justin Elliott were the only source for the connection between Perry and the Aga Khan. Unfortunately, that is not the case; if it were, the Perry/Aga Khan ties could easily be dismissed as Leftist propaganda. But they can't, and Ace and the others who try to dismiss or downplay the Perry/Aga Khan ties by saying that Geller got it from Salon know they can't -- there are too many other sources besides Salon. So why do they keep bringing up Salon? To manipulate you into thinking that Leftist propaganda is all there is to this. In playing that kind of shell game, they're no better than the Center for American Progress.

Ace is mightily enthused about David Stein's purported refutation of the problems that Pamela Geller and I have raised about Perry, and to which I responded in part here. Ace calls it "the greatest rejoinder in the history of blogdom." It is, in fact, considerably less than that; if Ace had done anything more than take it at face value and accept its claims uncritically, he would have discovered that quickly.

Ace claims that Stein has shown that "the 'dhimmi' curriculum that was actually produced by Texas teachers consulting with Aga Khan is...going to hurt Perry, because this is so biased against Muslims it will reinforce perceptions he is some kind of rootin'-tootin' six-gun shooting cowboy yahoo."

One very odd thing about the Aga Khan/Perry curriculum: since this whole brouhaha started, it has been taken offline. It is now available only in cached form here. Why was it taken down? Was the Perry camp embarrassed by the material that Pamela Geller published here, showing it to be a whitewash of Islamic teaching and history? Or was it taken down because it really is, as Ace says, so "biased against Muslims it will reinforce perceptions [Perry] is some kind of rootin'-tootin' six-gun shooting cowboy yahoo"?

Is either option favorable to Perry? If it was taken down because it's a dhimmi whitewash, Perry is tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right, and those evaluating Perry should be concerned about his naivete in dealing with the Aga Khan. If it was taken down because it was too honest about Islam and will thus hurt Perry with the dhimmi/Norquist faction of the GOP, Perry is again tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right: he is not able or willing to stand up to Norquist and his Islamic supremacist allies. So which is it? What are they hiding? And does it matter? Either way, the deep-sixing of the curriculum proves that we were right about Perry all along.

Ace gets his information from David Stein here. And indeed, the material that Stein presents, and Ace republishes, seems to be great. It speaks honestly about Islamic conquests: "From its early days, Islam reacted aggressively toward its civilized neighbors the Byzantines and the West." It notes that "while Westerners studied Islamic culture, Muslims showed almost no interest in Western culture, remaining ignorant of modernity and its impact."

It even seems to expose Islamic hatred of Israel: "The conflict continues because the West, and the United States specifically, support Israel (an outpost of Western Civilization surrounded by Islamic Civilization), which Muslims generally dislike or hate. Islamic enmity toward Israel is complicated, but hatred of Jews and Israel can be traced at least to the success of Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda starting in 1933."

But Ace is wildly overstating his case when he says, in his typical half-witted beer swiller's lingo, "Are you shitting me? Gellar's attacking this? This reads like her fucking blog for fuck's sake. In Texas, they're fucking reading 'Atlas Shrugs' to the kids, and Geller's complaining. Maybe it's because she thinks she's owed royalties."

Ace clearly doesn't know the first, foggiest thing about Islam; after all, it's not the name of a porn mag or a brand of beer. If he did, he would recognize that the claim that "Islamic enmity toward Israel is complicated, but hatred of Jews and Israel can be traced at least to the success of Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda starting in 1933" is itself a whitewash. Islamic antisemitism didn't begin in 1933 or come from the Nazis; it's as old as Islam itself, going back to the Qur'an's designation of the Jews as the worst enemies of the Muslims (5:82) and Muhammad's exiles and massacres of the Jews of Arabia. See a full discussion of this question here.

Why does this matter? It's misleading. If you think that Islamic antisemitism is something they picked up from the Nazis after centuries of Islamic tolerance (more on that later), one will tend to think that it is something that is carried lightly among the opponents of Israel, and can be reasoned or negotiated away. This will lead one to support political solutions for the Israeli/Palestinian conflict like land-for-peace that not only cannot and will not work, but weaken Israel.

Ace doesn't know anything about Pamela Geller, either, or he would know that she has written about the Qur'anic roots of Islamic antisemitism, and so would recognize that bit about the Nazis making the Muslims antisemitic as a whitewash, also.

This supposedly tough part of the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum, which you can find in full at this cached link here, is actually not at all the Islamorealistic presentation that Ace and Stein claim it to be. It does contain the material that they quote, but note that in all that, and in all the rest of it, there is absolutely nothing about the Qur'an's or Muhammad's exhortations to violence.

Again, why does that matter? Because if you don't identify the root of the problem correctly, you will continually apply the wrong remedies. The idea that Islam is a Religion of Peace that has been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists has led the U.S. to all sorts of policy errors, foreign and domestic: pouring billions in Pakistan, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, treating stateside Islamic supremacist groups with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood as neutral civil rights organizations, etc. If the exhortations to violence and subjugation of unbelievers under Sharia that are contained in Islamic texts and teachings were acknowledged in the public sphere, Muslim groups in the U.S. could be challenged to show what they're doing to teach against such things, and investigated for sedition where appropriate. Instead, law enforcement and government officials constantly trust individuals and groups that are untrustworthy, because they don't understand the smooth ways in which they're being deceived.

Still, all in all, the material Stein presents on the curriculum is fairly good. But there is a curious thing: the picture one gets of curriculum from Geller and from Stein are wildly divergent. Stein claims that this is because Geller quotes from "brief summaries of lengthy training seminars," while he presented the "entire lesson plan." But that's not actually the case. Go to the cached link of the main page for the curriculum. It says this:

In April 2004, the Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) and UT-Austin finalized a grant proposal that created the partnership that became known as the Muslim Histories and Cultures Program (MHC). Much has happened since the inception of the partnership. Creation and implementation of a model was of prime importance. MHC recruited and directly trained 80 teachers affecting approximately 15,150 students of World History and World Geography in ten key Texas districts during the two sessions conducted in 2005 and 2006. The purpose is two-fold 1) to fulfill Governor Rick Perry's desire to better educate Texas teachers on Muslim topics and 2) to train teachers to use a cultural lens approach to understanding other cultures. Governor Perry was instrumental in getting this program off the ground.

It adds -- and note this well -- that "the curriculum for this project was developed at Harvard University and modified at the University of Texas at Austin." Now this is apparently referring to the curriculum for the training of the 80 teachers in the two sessions conducted in 2005 and 2006. And this material is very, very bad. It contains all the material Geller quoted, including a whitewash of Muslim Spain (debunked here) and the use of texts by the likes of Carl Ernst, John Esposito, and Michael Sells. Carl Ernst is the academic propagandist who actually traveled to Tehran in 2008 to accept an award from Iran's genocidally antisemitic President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. John Esposito is a Saudi-funded pseudo-academic who has cooked data about Islamic moderates. Michael Sells produced an edition of the Qur'an that left out all the violent and hateful bits. And they're by no means the only questionable authorities that this curriculum invokes.

But wait a minute. Remember, "the curriculum for this project was developed at Harvard University and modified at the University of Texas at Austin." But Stein claims to present "the curriculum that resulted from the Perry/Khan partnership," and specifically, "the lesson plan that deals with Islam and the West, past and present." Stein says that "the lesson plan was written by Ronald Wiltse," who is "a retired history teacher in San Antonio." But is Wiltse's lesson plan actually part of the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum at all? Only peripherally -- at best. Look back at the main cached page for the curriculum. It says that "MHC recruited and directly trained 80 teachers affecting approximately 15,150 students of World History and World Geography in ten key Texas districts during the two sessions conducted in 2005 and 2006," and that "the responsibilities of the participants are...to create lessons concerning Islamic topics with a 'cultural lens' approach tied to their grade level to share with other teachers."

That's where you find Wiltse's lesson plan: among the lesson plans developed by the 80 teachers who attended these sessions. In other words, the material David Stein and Ace are quoting as the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum is not actually part of the curriculum at all. What they're quoting is a lesson plan drawn up by one participant in the seminars that Perry and the Aga Khan sponsored in Texas -- this would be like quoting some high school kid's test answers and passing them off as the official curriculum of the school district. The material Geller quoted, on the other hand, with its multiple whitewashes of the Qur'an, Muhammad, and Islamic history, comes from the Harvard/University of Texas curriculum for the training of teachers using the Perry/Aga Khan material.

David Stein and Ace are selling the conservative blogosphere a bill of goods. They're quoting a supposedly tough, Islamorealistic lesson plan (that isn't actually all that tough or Islamorealistic in the first place) and passing it off as the official Perry/Aga Khan curriculum, when in fact, it is no more the official curriculum than a 9th grader's history paper is the official history curriculum for the school district.

Ace then turns to the Grover Norquist business. But here again, neither Ace nor the brains of the outfit, David Stein, deal with the fact that Norquist is clearly much closer to Perry than to other candidates. As I wrote here, "Perry and Grover Norquist held a joint press conference in March 2011. Perry appeared at a fund-raiser for Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform group. Also, Norquist actively campaigned for Perry back in 2009. Their association is longstanding: Perry was investigated by the Texas Ethics Commission in 2004 for allegations that the Governor illegally used campaign money to finance a trip to Bahamas; the point here is not the allegations, but the fact that along on the Bahamas trip at his own expense was Grover Norquist. Perry and Norquist are clearly not just casual acquaintances." In response, all Stein and Ace have done is point out that other candidates have worked with Norquist, too. Indeed. Which have fundraised for him? Which have vacationed with him? Any of them other than Perry? If so, I will criticize them for it as well.

Ace asks: "Ummm... we're not allowed to talk with Grover Norquist anymore, Pam? Can't sign his anti-tax pledges?" Actually, it's the other way around: is it really necessary to play ball with Norquist in order to come out for cutting taxes? Is there no candidate who will have the courage to endorse his tax policies but distance himself from him because of his Islamic supremacist ties?

But I am not asking these questions of Ace, who is demonstrably dishonest. Take this, for example:

Anyway, Stein at Counter-Contempt makes the point that if even Robert Spencer, gold-star anti-Jihadist, gave Aga Khan a clean bill of health and vouched for him, why should Rick Perry be blamed for similarly thinking he checked out?

Now, Aga Khan might actually still check out. There's no actual proof he doesn't. But let's say he does turn out to be just as Geller now alleges.

Stein asks Spencer, "How can you blame Perry for making the same error you did?" To which Spencer just says something like "He's the governor, he should have known."

Actually, I said "something like" this: "I am not entering into partnership with the Aga Khan. If I were, I would certainly vet him thoroughly first, and Perry should have." Is that "He's the governor, he should have known"? I guess for a guy like Ace, it's close enough.

Ace concludes: "This is anti-Jihadism quickly shading into anti-Americanism." So now it's "anti-American" to be skeptical about Rick Perry because he is too close to the Aga Khan and Grover Norquist? "Anti-American" to want to vet a candidate and not want the next president to have potentially compromising ties? Have another beer, Ace. Stick to what you're good at.

Meanwhile, Stein's bait-and-switch presentation on the Perry/Aga Khan curriculum has not just fooled a lout like Ace, but people who should know better, like Red State and the reliably dhimmi Commentary. Will they retract their contemptuous sneers and acknowledge they were working on false premises? I won't be holding my breath.

| 101 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Muslim advocates usually assert that Muslims are 'unshakable' in their conviction to remain believers, especially in the face of 'pernicious infidel religions' (particularly Christianity). However, the repeated actions of many Muslim officials and governments stand in stark contrast to such confident assertions.

As to why invasive, totalitarian measures are always necessary to keep the Islamic faithful in line, asking this is Islamophobic, politically incorrect, and in Malaysia, illegal. Such measures, such as the establishment of so-called 'faith purification centres' (religious prisons) and now, the Orwellian-named 'faith rescue unit', are increasingly commonplace in Malaysia. "[Malaysian state of] Selangor forms ‘faith-rescue unit’ for Muslims", The Malaysian Insider, 26 August 2011:
SHAH ALAM, Aug 26 — Selangor religious councillor Datuk Hasan Ali has set up a “faith-rescue unit”, or Unit Selamat Aqidah, to look into problems faced by Muslims that could expose them to risks of losing their religious conviction amid allegations of proselytisation in the state.

The PAS leader said his office was concerned about the issue of proselytisation as troubled Muslims could resort to help from other groups that might lead them away from Islam.

“This office takes a serious view of the negative perceptions of the state agencies, bodies and voluntary organisations that appear not to help solve the problems of this group of people.

“This office has taken the initiative to set up the Unit Selamat Aqidah, which, among others, is a service centre to accept complaints and applications to help reduce the burden of life of these people,” Hasan said in a statement

The idea that Islamic government, and Islam itself, are burdens is unthinkable.

He said the unit will work with the Selangor Zakat Board and voluntary organisations concerned about the issue, adding the board will name officials who will process applications for aid.

“It is hoped that Muslims who have received or are thinking of receiving aid from churches or Christian organisations can come to the Islamic Affairs, Malay Culture, Infrastructure and Public Amenities Exco to give their details so that help can be provided immediately,” Hasan said.

You know, Christians with their tendency to help anyone and everyone, regardless of their religion -- that's what makes them so dangerous.

The conservative Muslim leader assured such people that his office would help them to avoid being trapped in moves to make them apostates.

Pro-Umno newspapers have been highlighting alleged attempts by Christians to convert Muslims since the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) raided an evangelical church in Petaling Jaya on August 3. Proselytising Muslims is an offence in Malaysia.

Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia also reported recently an allegation that underprivileged Muslims living in a squatter area near Old Klang Road were being proselytised by Christians under the guise of free English classes.

The tuition centre was subsequently shut down for purportedly not owning a valid permit.

Lacking the proper permit...how convenient -- for the Muslims, of course.

Influential cleric Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, however, said yesterday that Muslims should take care of their own poor instead of accusing Christians of proselytism when churches helped poor Muslims.

Tensions between Christians and Muslims have heightened after Jais swooped on the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC), on claims that it was investigating a complaint that Muslims were being converted at a dinner the church was hosting for a local NGO.

Based on the foregoing, it can reasonably concluded that Islamic governments, such as Malaysia's, whether its 'moderate' or otherwise, will inevitably revert to the following two principles:

First, that Muslims are always considered essentially as perennial minors, unable to rule their own lives, untrusted to make their own decisions, and undeserving to have any meaningful freedom. In other words, to live in an Islamic society is to forever be treated as a child. As a Muslim under Muslim rule, your innermost, private thoughts have become the domain and property of the Muslim mullahs, imams, ayatollahs and other overlords who rule in Allah's name.

Secondly, the idea that one might stray from Islam, may have doubts, and might stop believing in Islam is a condition that is considered exactly like mental illness, or perhaps a drug dependency. Thus under Islam (as in certain leftist Western circles) the idea of 'thought crime' becomes not only real, but an offense of the highest order. Indeed, long ago Shariah codified free will, i.e. 'disbelief', as the gravest crime in Islam

These two attributes are inherent of Islam.  Not 'Islamism', not 'radical Islam', not 'Wahhabism', but Islam.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From our Well, This Inspires Confidence Department. Surely they must know the fastest way to draw scrutiny in an open society is to act as if there is something to hide. In a case like this, involving foreign powers, terrorism, the Muslim Brotherhood, and massive amounts of money, the lack of an explanation demands an explanation. "DOJ Keeping Islamic Bank Settlement Secret," by Steve Emerson for Family Security Matters, August 26 (thanks to Kenneth):

The Justice Department has agreed to end its investigation into an international financial network with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and a Saudi prince in a settlement in excess of $30 million, sources tell the Investigative Project on Terrorism.
But DOJ officials refuse to release a copy of the settlement or make any comment on it.
"Unfortunately, we're unable to provide anything in connection with this matter," DOJ spokesman Charles Miller wrote in response to a query Aug. 16. He did not contest the existence of the settlement with the Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf (IICG). Repeated attempts to obtain the settlement, or at least a clear explanation of why it cannot be released when most government settlements are a part of the public record, have been unsuccessful.
"We will have no further comment," Miller said Wednesday.
Reports of a grand jury investigation into an IICG domestic affiliate called Overland Capital surfaced early in 2007. Though the grand jury was convened in Boston in September 2006, a terror-financing prosecutor from DOJ was leading the tax evasion probe into the bank, the Wall Street Journal reported. Overland Capital allegedly was controlled by the Dar al-Maal al-Islami Trust (DMI), an Islamic financial institution founded by Saudi Prince Mohamed al-Faisal and which had at least two influential Muslim Brotherhood figures on its board, the Journal reported.
It described DMI as "the hub of a network of banks and investment funds across Europe and the Middle East that cater to Muslims interested in strictly following Quranic principles, such as a ban on collecting interest." It cited records showing DMI held "an indirect 60 percent" share in Overland Capital.
The IICG, meanwhile, is a "wholly owned subsidiary" of DMI Trust, according to the Faysal Asset Management Limited website. IICG has operations on four continents and managed $1.6 billion in funds in December 2007. Saudi Prince Mohamed al-Faisal founded DMI Trust nearly 30 years ago, the Journal reported. He remains on its board, along with serving on the boards of Faisal Islamic banks in Sudan and Egypt.

Imagine the disastrous moral and political compromises our governments would not be making if not for Saudi petro-blackmail. Energy independence, to the greatest extent possible, must be a greater priority; we won't know what we can achieve until we try.

The Faisal Private Bank reportedly was investigated during the 1990s for possible terror financing links. The Journal story notes that it was mentioned in a Hamas financing case involving transfers to the group and its current deputy political director, Mousa Abu Marzook.
DMI has had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, with at least two of the movement's contemporary figures serving on its board. Sudanese Brotherhood figure Hassan al-Turabi spent 10 years as a DMI director during the 1980s and early 90s, the New York Times reported in August 2007. During the same time he was a director, Turabi urged Osama bin Laden to move al-Qaida to Sudan, the 9/11 Commission Report said.
Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi also served as an early DMI Trust advisor, the Times reported. Though labeled a moderate by some, Qaradawi has a long record of anti-Semitism, support for Palestinian suicide bombings and attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq, and recently expressed his desire to kill a Jew before he dies.
Records from civil litigation in Fort Worth indicate that the criminal investigation remained active as recently as February. In October, a judge granted a stay of discovery in a breach of contract lawsuit between Vinewood Capital, LLC and DMI Trust. The stay was based on a government request that is sealed. But in his order granting the stay, U.S. District Judge Terry R. Means wrote that the government asked for the delay to protect information from a key witness in the criminal investigation who is subject to discovery in the civil case.
"[D]isclosure of the contents of his testimony would substantially prejudice the pending criminal investigation," Judge Means wrote.
The criminal investigation involved statutes covering tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the United States by IICG.
"Additionally," the judge wrote citing the sealed government motion, "while IICGB has not been indicted, the 'investigation has been ongoing for nearly four years[,] has continued to progress[,] and is nearing a conclusion.'"
In January, after DMI sought another discovery freeze in the civil suit, DOJ prosecutor Corey Smith wrote that, while the government requested the earlier stay, it did not need additional time. "The Motion also accurately represents my comment that I believe a settlement of the Criminal Case with [IICG] criminal counsel is likely in the very near future."
That appears to have happened. But the Department of Justice is keeping all the details secret.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

While the Center for American Progress and allied groups carry out character assassination against the most prominent voices who dare to point out that Islam is not a Religion of Peace, in Ontario, Islamic supremacists deal with a lesser-known writer by using for traditional methods to convince him of their point of view.

Paris Dipersico's book proven correct: "‘Anti-Muslim’ author beaten," by Ian Robertson in the Ottawa Sun, August 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

OAKVILLE, Ont. - Halton police are treating an attack on a first-time author whose self-published book has been branded anti-Muslim as a possible hate crime.

Raised Islamic, Paris Dipersico, 24, reported being dragged from his bicycle Aug. 17, tied up among trees, then beaten briefly unconscious by two Muslim men.

Accused of being gay, they then "called me a Jew in Arabic and said the Jews are paying you to write this against Islam," the author of Wake Up Call said Thursday.

Dipersico said he also received a "death threat" on his Facebook site, then someone stole files and backup writing discs after breaking into the home he shares with cousin Gabrielle Dipersico -- who helped design the book and whose photo is on the cover.

Believing the threat came "from the Middle East," he said it demanded he remove offensive language. [...]

Using several characters, including ones named Paris and Gabrielle plus others disguised or altered, Dipersico said Wake Up Call was a self-healing project based on troubling experiences with relatives telling him they are superior to others, while some lied, cheated and committed adultery.

Released in June, it has been accused of being pornographic, celebrating drug use and mocking various religions.

Dipersico wrote "Islam is a religion of 'peace' and Muslims will kill you to prove it," but said "I'm not saying every Muslim is violent or every Muslim is a bad person." Fully realizing "for a Muslim to go against Islam, the punishment is death," he said violent ones are often "ignorant," brainwashed with twisted religion-based messages. [...]

"We are Muslim, but we were raised in Canada," Paris said.

He said they now "don't leave the house after dark," notify police when they go out and installed video surveillance.

Det. Sgt. Anthony Odoardi said investigators "believe he was targeted" and are considering "a publication he has written" could be the motive for the attack.

No kidding, really?

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why is the Obama State Department worried about the privacy rights of this Islamic jihadist who has repeatedly inspired and masterminded plots to kill large numbers of Americans? "State Department: Don't Invade Privacy of Cleric on CIA Kill List," by Catherine Herridge for FoxNews, August 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

While the New Mexico-born cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, is the first American on the CIA's kill or capture list, the U.S. State Department refuses to release documents about al-Awlaki citing his right to privacy. This disconnect was uncovered as part of the ongoing investigation by Fox News' Specials Unit into the cleric who is a leader of a major Al Qaeda affiliate.

Through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in March 2010, Fox News requested "....any and all records maintained by the United States Department of State, in the passport file...." for the cleric. Initially, the request was referred to Human Resources at the State Department, before a formal response was issued more than a year later, in August 2011. The letter reads in part :

"The Department of State, Passport Services has reviewed your request and has given full consideration to the reasons provided. However, we have determined that your request must be denied. This denial is pursuant to subsection (b)(6) of the Freedom of Information Act. The release of this information to you would be an invasion of personal privacy of another person, without written authorization from that person."

The government refused to release the records for the terror leader who is well known to be the first American that the U.S. government has green-lighted to be killed or captured.

After 9/11, Anwar Al-Awlaki was a tier one, priority target for the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) in San Diego because of his known contacts with the hijackers. A State Department agent assigned to the JTTF, Ray Fournier, put together an arrest warrant for passport fraud in 2002. As part of that fraud, al-Awlaki lied on his Social Security application claiming he was born in Yemen, not New Mexico. At the time, there was not enough firm evidence to link the cleric to 9/11, so the passport fraud case was seen as a holding charge.

In addition, as Fox News was first to report in its special "The American Terrorist," the cleric fraudulently obtained $20,000 in scholarship money to fund his college education in Colorado. Al-Awlaki, who is a dual U.S./Yemeni national, claimed to be a foreign student. As an American citizen, the cleric was not entitled to the scholarship paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. According to the agent who handled the case, the documents still exist and are held by the State Department.

The denial of State Department documents is part of an ongoing pattern. In 2010, through the Freedom of Information Act, Fox News sought an FBI intelligence report, also known as an EC, that was written about the cleric and his radical ties two days before the cleric mysteriously entered the U.S. in October 2002 and the arrest warrant for passport fraud was pulled by the Justice Department. When the 27 page EC was produced by the FBI, all of the pages were redacted, citing national security and an executive order -- most likely, the warrantless wiretapping program.

Both the Justice Department and FBI have refused Fox News' requests and resisted calls from Congress to explain why the cleric was able to slip through the grasp of federal agents just one year after the 9/11 attacks. On Oct. 10, 2002, Al-Awlaki was held by Customs agents at JFK International airport for three hours until an FBI agent, Wade Ammerman, ordered the cleric's release, even though there was an active warrant for al-Awlaki's arrest on passport fraud....

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It was predictable enough. Needless to say, this attack is a major escalation for Boko Haram, and the stability of the country depends on the strength of Abuja's response. "Abuja attack: Car bomb hits Nigeria UN building," from BBC News, August 26:

At least 18 people have been killed in an apparent suicide car bombing at the United Nations headquarters in the Nigerian capital, Abuja.
The powerful blast destroyed the lower floors of the building. Dozens have been injured, some critically.
A spokesman for the Islamist group Boko Haram told the BBC in a phone call that it had carried out the attack.

If "Western Education is Sin" (a rough translation of the group's name), where does he suppose phones come from?

UN chief Ban Ki-moon said the attack was "an assault on those who devote their lives to helping others".

The UN was an inevitable target, due in part to its high visibility. Above all, Boko Haram consistently targets institutions and practices that could stand in the way of its intentions to impose Sharia.

Speaking before Boko Haram's statement, President Goodluck Jonathan reaffirmed his government's "total commitment" to combating terrorism, and said his administration would "spare no effort to bring the perpetrators to justice".
In Friday morning's attack, a car crashed through two security barriers and rammed into the building's reception before exploding, witnesses said.
Hospitals are said to be overwhelmed by the number of injured and have appealed for blood donations.
Boko Haram, which is fighting for the establishment of Sharia law in Nigeria, also said it carried out a car bombing at police headquarters in June.
A UN official in Nigeria, who spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity, said the UN had stepped up security at all its buildings in Nigeria in the past month after receiving information that the UN could be targeted by Boko Haram.
Analysts say that the scale and target of the attack could point to a link with international terror groups.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Those who hold the reins of power could care less about where they cross the line into "compulsion in religion" (Qur'an 2:256). Indeed, Islamic law contradicts itself on that very point, being replete in letter and spirit with various forms of coercion and persuasion. Some are more subtle, but many are brutal. Most fundamentally, there are the three options afforded unbelievers by Qur'an 9:29: conversion, subjugation, or war.

The Bishop of Islamabad warned just weeks ago that abductions of non-Muslim girls for forced conversion and marriage have become a common practice, though they often go unreported or unrecorded by unsympathetic authorities. Below, the Archbishop Emeritus of Lahore agrees.

Here is yet another case. "Punjab: Muslims kidnap 14 year old Christian to convert her to Islam," from Asia News, August 26:

Lahore (AsiaNews) - A group of Muslims have kidnapped a 14 year old Christian girl from her home under the threat of a gun and in front of witnesses. The incident occurred on August 17 last in Shisharwali, residential area of the city of Gujranwala, Punjab. According to reports from the Pakistan Christian Post (PCP), Mohammad Tayeb Butt along with four other Muslims raided the house of Rashid Masih in broad daylight, pointed the gun to the head of his daughter Mehek forcing her to climb aboard a white car .
Two young Christians, Imran Masih and Mehboob Masih, tried to rescue the girl, but Mohammad Tayeb pointed the gun at them and threatened to shoot. "She is a Choori" the Muslim shouted, at Mehek, using derogatory and insulting Punjab slang, to define a Christian (for example, when Muslim restaurant owners or street food vendors reject minority religious customers, ed) . He also added that the Choori Mehek will be purified "convert to Islam and become my mistress."
Sources report that the local Christian activists from the All Pakistan Minorities Alliance (APMA) have tried to report the incident to the police. But the agents did not want to open an investigation - as is often the case - at the expense of an influential Muslim personality.
Interviewed by AsiaNews, the Archbishop Emeritus of Lahore and former president of the Pakistan Catholic Bishops' Conference Mgr. Lawrence John Saldanha stresses that such cases are "common in Pakistan," and families "can do little or nothing" to save the victims from their captors. He adds: "The Muslim family has an advantage, because the law favors them."
Added to the tragedy of the kidnapping, the prelate continues, are "the future difficulties that the unfortunate young girl will suffer in the Muslim family." These are "sad and tragic" episodes for the Christian community and represent, concludes Mgr. Saldanha, "one of the many crosses that the small minorities (even the Hindus) without hope must bear in Pakistan."
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Al-Qaeda claimed the last major attack. The timing of this attack to coincide with the end of the day's fast would fit their flair for symbolism in slaughter. "Algeria suicide bomb attack hits military academy," from BBC News, August 26:

A suicide bomb attack on a military academy in Algeria has killed 18 people, officials say.
The attack took place in the town of Cherchell, about 100km (60 miles) west of the capital Algiers.
One or two bombers set off their explosives just after the breaking of the Ramadan fast, reports said.
No group has said it carried out the attack. It comes 12 days after a suicide car bombing of a police station in Tizi Ouzu wounded 29 people.
That attack was claimed by the Islamist group Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), which is active in the region.
It was not clear how many of those killed in the latest attack were military. A hospital source told Reuters news agency 16 soldiers had been killed and two civilians.
Political violence has subsided since the 1990s when more than 150,000 were killed after the 1992 election, won by an Islamist party, was annulled.
But militant groups continue to carry out sporadic attacks.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story notes that al-Shabaab certainly seems to like their beheadings and amputations, but does not make the connection regarding their symbolic significance. The point al-Shabaab intends to make is that they are playing "by the book" as they fight to impose Islamic law.

Qur'an 47:4: "Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks..."

Are the enemies nominally Muslims? No problem. They declare their enemies apostates. The penalty for anyone who "changed his religion" is death, according to Muhammad's own orders.

Qur'an 5:33: "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter."

Qur'an 5:38: "As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise"

"Somali Islamists behead 11 civilians in capital," by Abdi Guled for the Associated Press, August 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) — Somali Islamist rebels have beheaded at least 11 civilians in the capital in the past two weeks, a campaign of terror that residents said Friday is designed to show the insurgency can still act in Mogadishu after withdrawing from their bases there earlier this month.
"We wake up with beheaded bodies on the streets every day," said Abdinur Marwan, who lives in a district of Mogadishu called Hewila. "They call themselves Muslims while doing what Allah banned! Everyone is trying to leave here because people are being killed like goats."

Those in power could care less who disagrees with their pronouncement of takfir.

The Islamist al-Shabab militia withdrew from their bases in the Somali capital after being steadily pushed back by more heavily armed African Union forces supporting the U.N.-backed Somali government. The Islamists described the withdrawal as a "tactical retreat" and said they would still carry out operations in the capital.
Resident Afrah Abdikhayre said five decapitated bodies were found in his Suqa Holaha area last week. He says two beheaded men in Somali government uniforms and another three headless bodies were found this week.
Resident Nur Sugow said al-Shabab beheaded a donkey cart driver in the Yaqshid district. Al-Shabab frequently carries out beheadings and amputations.
The militia also executed two men and a 16-year-old boy by firing squad on Tuesday after accusing them of spying.
Residents — some to terrified to give their names — appealed to the Somali government and AU troops to secure their neighborhood. Although al-Shabab has pulled back, individual fighters are still active in the city and gunfire is still common.
Somalia has been without a functioning government since 1991 and at least five of its districts are suffering from famine.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 26, 2011

Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America,” from the Center for American Progress is just the latest in an ever-lengthening string of markedly similar “exposés” of so-called “Islamophobes.” Each purports to show that the anti-Sharia movement in America is a sinister cabal of well-funded, dishonest hacks stirring up hate against innocent Muslims in order to profit from it. Each has been highly distorted and markedly unfair, twisting the facts and cooking the data in order not to enlighten but to manipulate, not to educate but to propagandize.

Just in recent months there have been two other reports, both almost identical in substance to “Fear, Inc.”: the far-Left Southern Poverty Law Center’s “Jihad Against Islam” and the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations’ “Same Hate, New Target: Islamophobia and Its Impact in the United States.” Each of these is lavishly produced, printed on glossy paper and full of colorful illustrations. With the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in the midst of a full-scale, years-long campaign at the United Nations to compel the West to criminalize any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to recruit and motivate terrorists, it would be useful to know who is funding these slickly produced reports; but, true to form, the mainstream media instead glosses over the radical and genuinely sinister ties of the organizations that produced them, and repeats their agitprop as if it were fact.

But it isn’t. In what follows I must, for reasons of time, limit myself largely to responding to the report’s attacks on me; however, the “Fear, Inc.” attacks on my colleagues and others doing similar work are no more substantive or less manipulative and propagandistic.

The misinformation starts on the first page, when the “Fear, Inc.” authors call me “one of the anti-Muslim misinformation scholars we profile in this report.” The term “anti-Muslim” is immediate evidence of the manipulative, propagandistic nature of this report: my work, and the work of the other scholars and activists demonized in “Fear, Inc.,” has never been against Muslims in the aggregate or any people as such, but rather against an ideology that denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people. In fact, years ago at Jihad Watch I had an exchange with an English convert to Islam. I said: “I would like nothing better than a flowering, a renaissance, in the Muslim world, including full equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies: freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, equal employment opportunities, etc.” Is all that “anti-Muslim”? My correspondent thought so. He responded: “So, you would like to see us ditch much of our religion and, thereby, become non-Muslims.”

In other words, he saw a call for equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies, including freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, and equal employment opportunities, as a challenge to his religion. To the extent that they are, these facts have to be confronted by both Muslims and non-Muslims. But it is not “anti-Muslim” to wish freedom of conscience and equality of rights on the Islamic world -- quite the contrary.

The report also contains a – by now obligatory – lengthy excursus on Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik: “While these bloggers and pundits were not responsible for Breivik’s deadly attacks, their writings on Islam and multiculturalism appear to have helped create a world view, held by this lone Norwegian gunman, that sees Islam as at war with the West and the West needing to be defended.” While granting that we are not responsible for Breivik’s acts, the report also takes pains to point out that “Robert Spencer and his blog were cited 162 times in the nearly 1,500-page manifesto of Anders Breivik, the confessed Norway terrorist who claimed responsibility for killing 76 people, mostly youths.” Not surprisingly, it doesn’t mention that I have never sanctioned or justified violence, or that Breivik was plotting violence in the 1990s, before I had published anything about Islam, or that he complained that I was not recommending violence, or that he recommended making common cause with jihadists, which I would never do – indicating that his “manifesto” is actually ideologically incoherent, and not a legitimate counter-jihad document at all. These facts are not mentioned in “Fear, Inc.,” because they would interfere with its propagandistic agenda.

As for the claim that Breivik committed his murders because of the worldview we had created that “sees Islam at war with the West,” “Fear, Inc.” is also silent about the many Muslims who have declared that they are indeed at war with the West, in the name of Islam. Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said: “Have no doubt... Allah willing, Islam will conquer what? It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world.” CAIR cofounder and longtime Board chairman Omar Ahmad said in 1998: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” (He now denies saying this, but the original reporter sticks by her story.) The prominent American Muslim leader Siraj Wahhaj said in 2002: “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.” The most influential Islamic cleric in the world today, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, has said: “Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice.”

True to form for these “Islamophobia” reports, “Fear, Inc.” ignores such statements and many others like them, attempting to create the impression that the only ones responsible for the idea that Islam is “at war with the West” are the “Islamophobes.”

Without offering any substantive refutation, “Fear, Inc.” dismisses as “inaccurate and perverse” my statement that Islam is “the only religion in the world that has a developed doctrine, theology and legal system that mandates violence against unbelievers and mandates that Muslims must wage war in order to establish the hegemony of the Islamic social order all over the world.” What is “inaccurate and perverse” is the report’s denial of this, since it is a matter of objective verification that all the mainstream Islamic sects and schools of Islamic jurisprudence do indeed teach that the Islamic umma must wage war against unbelievers and subjugate them under the rule of Islamic law. The report does not and cannot produce any evidence that Islam does not contain sects and schools that teach this.

Most of what “Fear, Inc.” says about me is just name-calling, but it makes an attempt at substance with this: “Spencer’s views on Islam—and his credibility in discussing Islam at all—are challenged by scholars at his own alma mater. He has ‘no academic training in Islamic studies whatsoever,’ according to Islamic scholar Carl W. Ernst, Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies and Director of the Carolina Center for the Study of the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Instead, Professor Ernst says Spencer selectively uses textual, religious evidence to mainstream the claim that ‘Islam is not a religion of peace.’ Indeed, Spencer gives misplaced credence to the ‘Sharia threat’ argument that is then mainstreamed by the Islamophobia network.”

Ernst’s dismissal of my work on the basis of my having “no academic training in Islamic studies whatsoever,” besides being false, is completely void of substance: the determination of whether or not one’s work is accurate is not decided by the number of one’s degrees, but by the nature of the work itself. What’s more, Ernst’s claim is especially laughable given the ideological dominance of the far-Left Middle East Studies Association (MESA) among academics in this field today, such that dissenting voices are seldom, if ever, heard. Ernst’s own objectivity, moreover, is in severe doubt after he flew to Tehran in December 2008 to accept an award from Iran’s anti-Semitic, genocide-minded Islamic supremacist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Another compromised authority that “Fear, Inc.” cites is Charles Johnson, the “Little Green Footballs” blogger who several years ago moved from the right to the hard Left, betraying his former friends and posting vicious and arguably libelous false charges about them. For “Fear, Inc.,” Johnson’s blog is “popular” and “right-leaning,” when in fact it is no longer either one.

“Fear, Inc.” likewise trumpets the 2004 Amman Message as a “Sharia-based condemnation of violence from the world’s leading Islamic authorities.” The report deceptively fails to mention, however, that the Amman Message forbids Muslim-on-Muslim violence based on takfir, or declarations by one Muslim group that another is apostate. The Amman Message’s three points, mentioned in “Fear, Inc.,” do not address violence or non-violent jihad activity against non-Muslims at all, and the Amman Message’s website actually endorses an undefined “legitimate jihad.”

That is indicative of the dishonesty and one-sidedness of this report. The chief indication of that dishonesty is the wildly misleading presentation of financial data – making the sums involved appear much greater than they actually were by lumping together donations given to disparate organizations over a period of many years. When examined closely, the sums involved are actually far lower than those regularly received by Leftist and Islamic supremacist groups such as the ones that have produced the recent “Islamophobia” reports. Hamas-linked CAIR just announced today that it had almost reached its goal of raising $650,000 during Ramadan. I have never received that kind of support for Jihad Watch during any comparable period of time.

An honest presentation about “Islamophobia” would address the American people’s reasonable concern about the continuing series of violent acts committed by Muslims in the name of Islam, and outline ways in which the Muslim community could lessen suspicion against Muslims by cooperating fully and honestly with law enforcement anti-terror activities. But instead, “Fear, Inc.” is designed to portray Muslims as victims and demonize all those who stand in the way of the misogynistic and unjust agenda of the Islamic jihad, whether advanced by violent or non-violent means. As such, it is simply an instrument of that jihad.

UPDATE: Hard-Left pseudo-journalist propagandist Michelle Boorstein of the Washington Post writes a predictably shoddy and biased piece about the report here. It contains absolutely none of the substantive refutation that I posted above, although it links to this point on my name, without alerting readers to the fact that the link on my name would take them to my response to the report. Also, earlier today I sent Boorstein this:

The $42 million figure is wildly misleading. It is an aggregate amount covering many years and many organizations. When are you going to cover the much more substantial funding of hate groups such as Hamas-linked CAIR, the SPLC, etc.?

This is a witch hunt designed to smear and discredit all who dare to speak out against Islamic Sharia-inspired misogyny, denial of the freedom of conscience, etc. Just today I have a story at Jihad Watch about a Muslim apostate whose life was threatened by Islamic supremacists in Norway. Why do you ignore the Westward spread of such Sharia-based thuggery and demonize those who stand for the human rights of such people?

She rendered that as: "Robert Spencer, another subject of the report, said the financial picture it gives is misleading because it lumps together various organizations over time."

Nor does Boorstein's piece contain any of the substantive points that David Horowitz raises here or Pamela Geller here. Boorstein "reports" the already wildly misleading figure of $42 million as "about $50 million."

She has served her masters well, although she does inadvertently reveal the report's true anti-free speech goal of defaming and discrediting freedom fighters: "'This isn’t playing games. We want to end Islamophobia. If we want to do that, we have to identify motivators of this hate industry, marginalize them and demand they be held accountable,' Shakir said." That's Faiz Shakir, one of the authors of the report and a Center for American Progress Vice President.

| 65 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The things that we were assured won't, can't, or ought not to happen after the Egyptian revolution are happening. Egypt's economy will suffer, leading to widespread discontent and potential political unrest. Good thing there's always Israel to blame. "Egypt’s Brotherhood declares war on the bikini," from All Headline News, August 25:

Sunbathing in Alexandria may soon be a thing of the past, at least if some Egyptian Islamist politicians have their way.
Egypt's tourism industry has suffered a severe blow since the outburst of anti-regime demonstrations in January. But that did not stop the Freedom and Justice Party, the political wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, from demanding stricter regulations over what tourists can do and wear while visiting the country. The party is urging officials to ban skimpy swimwear and the consumption of alcohol on Egyptian streets.

Freedom and Justice: you are free to obey Sharia, which will be given a monopoly on the definition of "justice."

"Beach tourism must take the values and norms of our society into account," Muhammad Saad Al-Katatny, secretary-general of Freedom and Justice, told Egyptian tourism officials on Monday. "We must place regulations on tourists wishing to visit Egypt, which we will announce in advance."
The call for new strictures on tourists comes as Egypt debates the role of Islam in the post-Mubarak era. Freedom and Justice is competing in elections scheduled for this autumn for parliament and opinion polls show a majority of Egyptians favor a greater use of Islamic law and mores. But a vocal minority worries that Egypt risks becoming an Islamic republic.

But the Obama administration's director of national intelligence said the Brotherhood was "largely secular."

"This is how things began in Iran," Hani Henry, a psychology professor at the American University in Cairo, told The Media Line. "The moderate youth wanted to implement changes, but the mullah's hijacked the revolution. The same thing is now happening here in Egypt with the Muslim Brotherhood. It makes me sick to my stomach."

Yes. As with Iran, many were duped by the promises of change. Technically, thing did change, just not for the better.

Along with Suez Canal tolls and energy exports, tourism is a major source of foreign exchange for Egypt. But with protests, strikes, and continued violence in the cities and Sinai Peninsula months after President Husni Mubarak was forced to step down, foreigners have hesitated to visit the country, which offers some of the world’s most spectacular antiquities as well as beaches and scuba diving.
Finance Minister Hazem Al-Beblawi told the Reuters news agency earlier this month that revenue from tourism would likely total $10 billion in the financial year that started on July 1, compared with $11.6 billion in 2009/10.
Al-Katatny told Al-Masry Al-Youm daily that his party had already set up a subcommittee to investigate the issue of incoming tourism to Egypt and planned to amend legislation following the upcoming parliamentary elections.
"Some slight changes will be made in public beaches, to make the situation better than it was before," Ali Khafagy, youth director of Freedom and Justice in Giza, told The Media Line. "Bathing suits and mixing on the beach are things that go against our tradition. It's not just a matter of religion. When I go to the beach I don't want to see nudity."
He said modest bathing gear or separate beaches for men and women are possible alternatives to the current situation.

They'll get a foot in the door and go from there.

Khafagy stressed that tourists would be free to do as they please in specially designated areas, adding that his party supported tourism to the country. But that did not satisfy the heads of Egypt's tourism industry, who met with the party’s secretary-general Al-Katatny for a heated debate on Monday.
"Without alcohol and bathing suits, no tourists will come and we will lose $13 billion a year," Hussam A-Shaer, head of the tourist company association, told Al-Masry al-Youm.

Then there are the antiquities, and what happens to those relics of jahiliyyah under Sharia:

But bathing suits are not the only worry of Egypt’s Islamists. Abd Al-Munim A-Shahhat, a spokesman for the Salafi group Dawa, has said that Egypt's world-renowned pharaonic archeology – its pyramids, Sphinx and other monuments covered with un-Islamic imagery – should also be hidden from the public eye.
"The pharaonic culture is a rotten culture," A-Shahhat told the London-based Arab daily A-Sharq Al-Awsat on Wednesday, saying the faces of ancient statues "should be covered with wax, since they are religiously forbidden." He likened the Egyptian relics to the idols which circled the walls of Mecca in pre-Islamic times. [...]
Henry of the American University said two classes of beaches already exist in Egypt, with modestly dressed, generally poor Egyptians occupying some and foreign tourists occupying others, mostly in the resorts of the Sinai Peninsula. He said he considered imposition of sharia law in Egypt "an act of aggression" that he would not tolerate.
Islamists have never been enamored of foreign tourism and before they were crushed by the Mubarak regime foreign visitors were often targeted for killings. Close to 60 Western tourists were killed by Islamist terrorists in the southern city of Luxor in 1997. Tourists were also attacked in bombings in the Sinai resorts of Taba, Sharm Al-Sheikh and Dahab in 2004, 2005 and 2006.
But Al-Katatny said that the Muslim Brotherhood regards Egypt's archeology as belonging to all of humanity, and should therefore be safeguarded.
"This heritage belongs to everyone, and one can't simply remove something he doesn't like," he told Al-Ahram daily.

Until one is too powerful to care.

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What we know now is that the bombing in Abuja appears to have been a suicide car bombing, a tactic synonymous with jihadist attacks. What remains to be seen is the exact assessment of responsibility. Suspicion immediately falls on Boko Haram as the most active jihadist group by far inside Nigeria, and this attack would fit its focused targeting of institutions and practices that go against the group's vision of a "pure" Islamic state. As "Boko Haram" itself stands for "Western Education is Sin," (among other translations) the UN's educational initiatives, as well as its involvement in the country as a foreign entity would make it an inevitable target.

That said, the bombing also comes at a time during which we have seen several reports of al-Qaeda inroads into Nigeria, and possible cooperation between the two groups.

"Abuja attack: Car bomb hits Nigeria UN building," from BBC News, August 26:

At least 18 people have been killed in an apparent suicide car bombing at the United Nations headquarters in the Nigerian capital, Abuja.
The powerful blast destroyed the lower floors of the building. Dozens have been injured, some critically.
UN chief Ban Ki-moon said the attack was "an assault on those who devote their lives to helping others".
A UN official told the BBC the UN had had intelligence that it could be targeted by Islamist group Boko Haram.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity in Nigeria, said the information was received last month.
The official said security had been stepped up at all UN offices in Nigeria in response.
A car bombing at police headquarters in June was blamed on Boko Haram, a group which wants the establishment of Sharia law in Nigeria....
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadis in Pakistan are relentless in their determination to make everyone too terrified to oppose them. After all, Muhammad said, "I have been made victorious through terror" (Bukhari 4.52.220)

"Pakistani slain governor Salman Taseer's son abducted," from the BBC, August 26 (thanks to David):

The son of assassinated Punjab governor Salman Taseer, who was killed in January for opposing the blasphemy law, has been abducted, Pakistan police say.

Shahbaz Taseer's car was intercepted by four men in Lahore city's upscale Gulberg area on Friday.

It is not known who seized Mr Taseer but his family said they had received "threats from extremist groups".

Governor Salman Taseer was assassinated by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri as he was about to get into his car....

His brother Sheryar Taseer told Reuters that their family had been receiving threats from the Taliban and extremist groups and that they could be behind the abduction.

Punjab Governor Salman Taseer was one of Pakistan's best-known political figures.

His killer said he was angered by the governor's support for reforming Pakistan's controversial blasphemy law.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story doesn't even mention the fact that Hamas-linked CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas jihad terror funding case. But it does contain useful information about Hamas-linked CAIR, amid the usual cluelessness. At least the right thing was done in part here.

"Catholic school won't host Ramadan dinner," by Denise Smith Amos for the Cincinnati Enquirer, August 26 (thanks to Andrew):

WESTWOOD - Mother of Mercy, a Catholic girls high school, complied with a request from Archbishop Dennis Schnurr and backed out of hosting an interfaith Ramadan dinner at the school Friday night.

Instead, the dinner will be held in the Catholic Center at St. Monica-St. George Parish in University Heights, which is not a school.

Schnurr on Monday asked Mother of Mercy to cancel its plans to host an Iftar, an evening meal, with a local chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

During the holy month of Ramadan, observant Muslims fast during the daylight hours and break their fast with a large meal at night. For some groups, the Iftar is a chance to share some aspects of their faith with non-Muslims and others in the community.

Mother of Mercy had planned to co-host an Iftar with CAIR’s local chapter since spring, when groups of Mercy students and students linked with CAIR performed community service together.

But recent emails and other contacts with school and Archdiocese officials changed their plans.

Mother of Mercy President Kirsten MacDougal said Schnurr has received complaints from people – she didn’t know how many. Most of the complaints were emails from people who do not live in this region but who follow the news and activities of CAIR’s national office, she said.

The emails “were not hostile, they were not threatening, but they were emotionally charged,” she said.

Schnurr could not be reached for comment. Archdiocesan spokesman Dan Andriacco said that Schnurr received complaints – not threats – about CAIR’s involvement.

Twice they have to say they didn't receive threats. This is because of the relentless campaign by Hamas-linked CAIR and others to depict the resistance to jihad and Islamic supremacism as inherently violent. Yet much more likely to issue threats, and carry them out, are the Islamic supremacists themselves, not their opponents.

MacDougal said her school and the Archdiocese still support interfaith dialogue, especially with Muslim groups, but the closeness to the 10th anniversary of 9/11 plays a factor.

“The fact that Mercy was co-hosting this Ramadan meal with the Council on American-Islamic Relations specifically had become too great a distraction from the positive intent of building relationships and understanding with our Muslim neighbors,” MacDougal wrote in her letter to staff.

“While the Archdiocese appreciates our good intentions, there is now some concern for the safety of those who would attend the meal due to the negative reaction this has garnered from some. As a result, the Archbishop has asked that we cancel our hosting the meal.”

Mother of Mercy’s parents and students Thursday disagreed about the school’s decision.

Some parents said they had read negative things about the national CAIR group and didn’t want Mercy associated with even the local group.

“I’m glad it’s canceled; it wasn’t a good thing,” said Kelly Jennings, a Mercy parent who lives in Bridgetown. “There were a lot of parents who were up in arms about it. … It would have really given Mercy a bad name.”

Casey Tegenkamp, a freshman from Miami Heights, was disappointed that the dinner won’t be held at the school, because she’d wanted to attend. She said she thinks it’s important for young people to understand other people’s faiths.

“We’ve got to know what other people’s religions are,” she said. “We need to know how other people think. If we don’t know, that might get us into trouble.”...

I couldn't agree more.

Andriacco said the complaints seemed mostly focused on CAIR’s national organization, which “has been the subject of U.S. government concern,” Andriacco said. “Archbishop Schnurr thought (it) had become a distraction from building relationships and understanding with our Muslim neighbors. … When you have a high emotional temperature surrounding an issue you start to worry about how the children might be affected by it.”

CAIR, based in Washington D.C., is the largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization in the United States. Its stated mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam and build coalitions that promote mutual understanding.

Local chapters of CAIR operate independently, like franchises, raising funds and supporting causes based on local priorities.

The national CAIR group has been scrutinized for years as one of many Islamic groups on the radar of federal agencies investigating terrorism.

Critics of CAIR say it supports an extremist agenda. They point out that at least five people with ties to the national group or its leadership have been convicted or deported because of links to terrorist groups.

The Washington, D.C.-based CAIR was among 275,000 nonprofits nationwide that the Internal Revenue Service stripped of tax-exempt status in June. None of the groups filed required tax returns, known as Form 990s, for three years, and any donations to them can be taxed, the IRS reported.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said his group filed accurate, on-time returns but lost its tax-exempt status over an incorrect filing from several years ago. But employees couldn’t produce CAIR’s latest Form 990 and critics suggest the charity avoided filing to hide financial dealings from the public.

Local and national CAIR spokespeople said their groups are not involved in criminal cases and advocate against terrorism and violence.

Yet the Cincinnati FBI office, along with other FBI offices around the country, was told several years ago by top FBI officials to limit contact with CAIR. Local offices are not permitted to participate in an event sponsored by CAIR and are not allowed to invite CAIR leaders to sit on boards or community groups set up by the FBI, said Mike Brooks, the FBI’s spokesman in Cincinnati.

But local agents do talk to CAIR officials and have investigated claims of civil rights violations against Muslims, he said.

“They are not considered to be a terrorist organization or anything like that,” Brooks said. “If they want to talk, we will talk.”

The meal at Mercy had been planned as a potluck, with about 100 adult and student participants bringing dishes to reflect their culture to the school cafeteria, CAIR organizers said. MacDougal said she knew of only two families from her school who had confirmed they would attend.

Roula Allouch, board president of the local CAIR group, said she was told Monday of Mother of Mercy’s decision to not host the dinner and she considered canceling it....

“It’s unfortunate for an event with the purpose of bringing together people of faith” was almost cancelled, Allouch said.

Bill Lonneman, the Franciscans Network’s advancement coordinator, said the Archdiocese didn’t want the gathering at a school, given the complaints and the 9/11 anniversary.

“I think the Archdiocese was just being very cautious,” he said. “It’s a shame the Archdiocese bowed to some pressure from outsiders.”

MacDougal said the Archdiocese still plans to participate in other events that include Muslims, such as the upcoming community 9/11 anniversary gathering on 3 p.m.
Sept. 11 at the Cincinnati Museum Center.

“I am sorry for any concern or sadness this may have caused, for Christian and Muslim alike,” she wrote in her letter....

Each year, Mercy seniors in the Comparative Religion class tour the Islamic Center of Greater Cincinnati in West Chester. Shakila Ahmad, a trustee at the Islamic Center, said it is “very, very rare” for an interfaith event to be canceled or moved.

“I’m really sad because it was an opportunity for people to break bread and build understanding,” she said. “If you don’t have opportunities to talk to each other, how are we going to understand our differences and build respect?”

I'm all for that. But how can we genuinely understand our differences and build respect on false pretenses? If a Hamas-linked group is involved with this, it should be known, and not made a taboo to discuss it.

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This takes real courage, for it could lead to violent reprisals from the adherents of the Religion of Peace and Tolerance. It also is heartening in that it shows that significant numbers of Copts are not willing to imbibe Islamic antisemitism and tow the Islamic supremacist political line. Anti-dhimmitude in Egypt: "Egyptian churches reject call for massive anti-Israel protest," by Emad Khalil in AlMasry AlYoum, August 25 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Egyptian churches announced on Thursday their rejection of a protest scheduled for next Friday to demand the expulsion of the Israeli ambassador to Cairo.

A number of activists who have been staging a sit-in in front of the Israeli Embassy called Tuesday for a million-strong demonstration to take place this Friday to demand the removal of the Israeli ambassador, a move that would likely further strain relations between Cairo and Tel Aviv....

The Coptic Church called for political groups and coalitions to leave the issue to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) and the government. It urged youths to cooperate with the military junta so that they do not become separated from their political leaders, as was the case under the former regime.

The Catholic Church spokesman Rafiq Greish said that youth should not interfere in what should be done with the Israeli ambassador and should leave the SCAF to deal with the matter....

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

3F7435E2DB8F422BA59A36358AF744D6.ashx.jpg


The Islamic Eid ul-Fitr celebrations mark the end of the Muslim fasting for the month of Ramadan. The socialist mayor of Copenhagen has decided to sponsor this religious event and re-brand it as a party for everybody. We are all invited:

"Come to Eid party in Copenhagen on September 1st," Københavns Kommune, August 25:

Copenhagen Municipality and the WorldCultureCentre transform Eid from a Muslim event into a huge Copenhagen-party for the third time.

The mayor's office informs us that:

Eid-ud-fitr, normally just called Eid, marks the ending of the Ramadan. Eid is a yearly event for a great many people living in Copenhagen, and is celebrated by almost all Muslims, practising or not. It is not so different from the Christian Christmas. Food is in focus, but first of all we are all meeting to party and support human values.

After all, Eid and Christmas are the same, right? Because Jesus and Muhammed are just sooo much alike...

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
As promised, the Malay-Muslims have begun their 'investigation' this week of a state religious police raid earlier this month on a Kuala Lumpur-area church. Yesterday the first hearing took place, which had some of the organizations involved in attendance. From "NGO and Jais reps meet panel", The Star, 26 August 2011:
SHAH ALAM: Parties involved in the controversial Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) [state religious police] operation on a multiracial thanksgiving dinner in a church met with the state hearing committee.

Jais was represented by its director Marzuki Hussin, while a group of six represented dinner organiser [NGO] Harapan Komuniti, including two lawyers.

The two groups met the hearing committee comprising Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, state mufti Datuk Tamyes Abd Wahid and his deputy Datuk Abdul Majid Omar.

First to meet them yesterday was Marzuki at 2.30pm. The meeting was held at the Mentri Besar’s office.

Marzuki emerged at 3pm, but was tight-lipped when met by reporters.

The Harapan Komuniti group, led by lawyers Datuk Kenny Ng and Annou Xavier, then met the committee for an hour before leaving at 4pm.

“We trust in the goodwill, good faith and good sense of the committee,” Ng said before leaving but refused to answer questions.

On Monday, Khalid announced the committee’s formation by the Selangor Government to investigate the dispute on the check conducted by Jais on the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC).

Jais had on Aug 3 entered the premises of DUMC [Damansara Utara Methodist Church], where a thanksgiving dinner was being held after being tipped off on an alleged attempt to proselytise Muslims.

That's a lot of Muslims with heavy-weight titles who are in attendance of a mere hearing. So, who was missing at this hearing? Where was the representative of the DUMC, the church that was 'checked' in the first place? Apparently the input of the accused is unnecessary, especially if the accused is an 'infidel'.

Leaving the church out of an investigation of a raid on the very same church should tell you how honest a Muslim investigation of a Muslim religious police raid is going to be. When the legal code they adhere to gives no standing to non Muslims, is it even remotely possible for Muslims to attempt to get to the truth of the matter when investigating their own affairs? Why do I keep getting a nagging feeling that the verdict for this kangaroo court's trial has already been decided

In Subang Jaya, MCA [Malaysian Chinese Association] president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek said issuing a gag order would not solve the controversy surrounding the Jais operation.
“This issue should be explained to the non-Muslims so that they understand better why proselytisation is such a sensitive issue for the Muslims,” he said at the Poh Toh Festival Dinner 2011 here last night.

The use of the word 'sensitive' is a disingenuous understatement, from one of Malaysia's top dhimmis, for an act which Islam's founder deemed a capital crime -- i.e. "whoever changes his religion, then kill him" (Bukhari 9.84.57).

Muslims (or the dhimmis like MCA who scupper to them) can never directly answer this simple question: why it is a 'racist', 'Islamophobic' or 'hateful' act to proselytize to Muslims, when it is never wrong for Muslims to do the same to those of other belief systems? Maybe because even the most pious Muslims somehow know in their hearts that the ideological goods they're selling are shoddy?

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

After having watched "Achmed, the dead suicide bomber" quite a few times, it is often difficult for me not to smile when a Muslim says "I kill you!" But this is quite serious:

Tortured in asylum center

At Hå asylmum centre, "Ali" had boiling water poured over him after converting to Christianity and not fasting during Ramadan. Now he and other converts fear for their lives.

"If you do not return to Islam, we kill you," was the message "Ali" got from other Muslims at the Hå asylum centre. He does not wish to have his face or real name published, out of fear of the Muslims at the centre. If Afghan authorities come to know about his conversion, he risks the death penalty by stoning if he is sent back to his home country.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wednesday at American Independence Park in Israel we had the dedication of the Aqsa Parvez Memorial Grove, dedicated to her memory and those of all victims of honor killing. This was the first public declaration anywhere by anyone that we will not allow these girls to be forgotten, and will keep speaking out against this barbaric practice until law enforcement authorities take decisive action to stop it spreading further in the West.

Video thanks to the generous and indispensable Shai.

Pamela Geller has photos and more details here.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Berlin is the third largest Turkish city after Istanbul and Ankara, and a prime example of failed multiculturism. Citizens are starting to discuss vigilantism and whether or not they should establish armed patrols. Christians "have long called for a special auxiliary police made up of volunteers who would have uniforms, batons and handcuffs."

Berlin: Citizen patrols mooted to stop car arsons, The Local, August 22:

As night-time car arsons in Berlin continue unabated, some citizens are calling for neighbourhood groups to prowl the streets looking for culprits, an idea that appears to be gaining ground.

The idea for citizen patrols has gained support during the week-long spate of arson in the German capital, which have left dozens of cars, mostly expensive models, burned out.

More than 300 vehicles have now been set alight since the beginning of the year, including five overnight Sunday. ...

Many people told the newspaper they were ready to join citizens’ groups to combat the attacks, because the government isn’t doing enough.

Some have suggested that neighbours begin carrying weapons and go on the hunt for perpetrators. Others have suggested a less vigilante-style response with simple unarmed neighbourhood patrols.

One 72-year-old who lives with his wife in the Berlin’s Westend district told Die Welt that residents have been debating what to do over the last few days. His idea is for a citizens’ patrol to go out for about an hour per night per night. It would alert police if it sees anything suspicious.

“Some residents here want to arm themselves,” he said. “What we need here is a kind of militia.”

Some people appear to be looking to London as a model, where many community groups lost confidence in police and formed successful vigilante groups to combat recent riots.

In Berlin, Burkhard Dregger, a politician with the centre-right Christian Democratic Union has long called for a special auxiliary police made up of volunteers that would have uniforms, batons and handcuffs. ..."

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

We have seen many other cases where a Muslim defendant has refused to recognize the authority of the court, with various gestures of disrespect, because it is not a Sharia court. And because he only recognizes Sharia law, Abdulmutallab therefore calls himself unlawfully imprisoned.

Unfortunately for him, we don't imprison defendants only according to the laws they recognize. "Underwear bomb suspect claims wrongful imprisonment by U.S., files for release," from the Detroit Free Press, August 25 (thanks to Zilla):

The so-called underwear bomber charged with trying to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner is arguing for his prison release, claiming wrongful imprisonment by the American government.
In a handwritten court document filed today, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 24, asked the court to release him from prison, arguing that "all Muslims should only be ruled by the law of the Quran."
"The defendant is being unjustly detained in the Unites States of American, and subjected to the Rule of Man," wrote Abdulmutallab, adding he should "only be judged and ruled by the law of the Quran."
In a separate, handwritten court filing, the Nigerian national also wrote that "excessive force" was used to restrain him on Wednesday while he was in his closed cell, during the "holy month of Ramadan." He wrote that between 5 a.m. and 10 a.m., "in defense of Muhammad," he assaulted several officers from his cell, and that as a result, "excessive force" was used to restrain him.
Abdulmutallab, who is acting as his own attorney in the case, also asked the court to order that no excessive force be used on him.

On appeal, he can claim his attorney was incompetent.

He's actually angry the guards fought back. From "'Underwear' bomb suspect claims assault on guards, seeks Quran judgment," by Robert Snell for the Detroit News, August 25 (thanks also to Zilla):

... "Defendant Abdulmutallab, in defense of Muhammad (peace be upon him … the messenger of Allah to Mankind who is being defamed and abused by the United States of America) assaulted several officers from his cell," he wrote. "As a result, excessive force was used to restrain defendant Abdulmutallab who was already in a closed cell on his own."
He asked Edmunds to order prison guards not to use excessive force while he is "justly defending Muhammad and his religion," according to the court filing....
| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Fraud is one thing; they passed themselves off as a man and a woman to be legally married. But of course, Sharia takes both the crime and the punishment to an entirely different level, prescribing death for homosexuality, often in cruel, unusual, and creative ways, such as the police chief calls for here. More traditionally:

"Gay people should be thrown head first off high buildings and if not killed on hitting the ground, they should be then stoned to death." - Minhaj al-Muslim (The Way of the Muslim)

Sharia's prescription of death for homosexual conduct also comes from Muhammad's own orders. "Indonesian Sharia police separate Aceh lesbian couple," by Alice Budisatrijo for BBC News, August 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Islamic police in the Indonesian province of Aceh have forced two women to have their marriage annulled and sign an agreement to separate.
The women had been legally married for a few months after one of them passed as a man in front of an Islamic cleric who presided over their wedding.
But suspicious neighbours confronted the couple and reported them to police.
The two women are now back with their families, forcibly separated and under surveillance by the Islamic police.
The local Sharia police chief told them Islam said they must be beheaded and burned for what they had done.
But Aceh, the only province in Indonesia that is allowed to implement Sharia law, has yet to adopt any provisions dealing with gay and lesbian people.
The provincial parliament passed Islamic laws authorising the stoning to death of adulterers and the caning of homosexuals in 2009, but the governor has refused to sign it.
Homosexuality is frowned upon but legal in Indonesia.
Activists have blamed Aceh's Sharia laws for encouraging vigilantism and intolerance, and say they violate the Indonesian constitution.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Boko Haram continues its campaign to make Nigeria safe for Sharia, and unsafe for absolutely anything else.

Its selection of targets focuses closely on institutions and practices that go against the rule of Sharia. In these attacks, those targets included the law enforcement of the current government, and banks that may have been engaging in riba, the charging of interest. "Radical Muslim sect kills 12 in northeast Nigeria," by Njadvara Musa for the Associated Press, August 25 (thanks to JCB):

MAIDUGURI, Nigeria (AP) — A radical Muslim sect blamed for attacks across northeast Nigeria bombed a police station and robbed two banks Thursday, killing 12 people in an assault highlighting the group's escalating willingness to shed blood, authorities said.
The sect, known locally as Boko Haram, stormed into the city of Gobi in Adamawa state in broad daylight, first attacking the police precinct with bombs and raking the building with gunfire, police commissioner A.T. Shinaba said. The group killed four police officers and a soldier guarding the area, he said.
The sect members then shot their way into two local branches of First Bank PLC and United Bank for Africa PLC, killing seven bank employees before speeding away with an unknown amount of cash, Shinaba said. Four others suffered injuries in the attack.
"Our police station was attacked this morning by a gang of suspected Boko Haram gunmen in vehicles and motorbikes," the shaken police commissioner told journalists. We are "combing the bush for fleeing sect members."
Nigeria, home to 150 million people, suffers from a weak police force more focused on collecting bribes than law enforcement in the oil-rich nation. The force also has been unable to handle the rise of Boko Haram, which many believed had been dismantled after a security crackdown following a sect riot in 2009 left 700 people dead.
The group, whose name means "Western education is sacrilege" in the local Hausa language, seeks the implementation of strict Shariah Islamic law in the country. Nigeria is largely split between a Christian south and Muslim north, where 12 states already have a version of Shariah in place.

Sharia governs every aspect of Muslim life. There can always be more Sharia, and someone will always demand more enforcement of it, and be willing to kill or overthrow governments to achieve it. In that regard, "versions" of Sharia in place are less a basis to make peace, and more of a foot in the door to insist on still more.

Boko Haram has been blamed for a rash of killings targeting security officers, local leaders and clerics in the area over the last year. It also has claimed responsibility for a bombing at the nation's police headquarters that killed two people in June.
This would be the first bank robbery attributed to the group, though sophisticated attacks on banks have been carried on banks in north Nigeria in recent weeks.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 25, 2011

When reading Western reports dealing with Islam, one must learn to read between the lines. Many of these reports do state the actual facts; but without providing proper context, Western readers are often left to interpret the information according to their own understandings.

One example: the ubiquitous term “sectarian strife” to describe Muslim-Christian clashes in the Middle East is factually correct; yet “sectarian strife” connotes comparable forces fighting one another, when in reality it is often nothing less than a vastly outnumbered Christian minority being grossly oppressed by Muslim majorities, as has happened for centuries.

Sometimes it is easy to fathom the true significance of a report (usually non-MSM). For example, a recent report titled “CAIR Wants Muslim-Turned-Christian Minister to Stop Training Immigration Officials” provides all the necessary data to reach an objective conclusion:

CAIR claims “We believe training by a person with such obvious bias against Islam and Muslims would only serve to heighten concerns American Muslims have about allegations of mistreatment at our nation’s borders.” Conversely, the apostate minister’s supporters argue that “they’re [CAIR] discriminating against him. They’re saying only our kind of Muslim, only someone who has not converted from Islam ... only people we approve can work for the U.S. government in the immigration service. That’s not the way it works in the U.S.”

Accordingly, only a bit of contextualizing is necessary to understand what this is all about: CAIR does not want an ex-Muslim—someone well acquainted with Islam—to impart his knowledge to U.S. officials.

Other times, reading a report requires more cogitation to get to its ultimate significance. For insistence, MEMRI recently reported that

The Coptic Church in Egypt has expressed its objection to the U.S. Congress’s appointment of a special envoy for minority affairs in the Middle East and Asia, who would be dealing with the Coptic minority in Egypt. They called on foreign Copts, who supported the appointment, to refrain from dealing with this subject. The Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and the Al-Nahda Party also objected to the appointment, claiming that it constitutes interference in Egypt's internal affairs.

This seems natural enough: Egypt’s religious leadership rejects foreign interference. However, when one realizes why a special envoy was created in the first place—because of the nonstop, documented incidences of persecution of Copts in Egypt—one is left asking: why would the Coptic Church, which knows better than anyone else the persecution of its flock, reject help? Knowledge of the dynamics of Islam and dhimmitude leads to the conclusion that the Church is being pressured to say that all is well for Christians in Egypt—or else.

Finally, when dealing with the MSM, the significance of an Islam-related story must usually be dug out. Consider the following excerpt from a recent New York Times piece titled “Behold the Mighty Beard, a Badge of Piety and Religious Belonging”:

[A]ll over the Muslim world, the full beard has come to connote piety and spiritual fervor. It is such a powerful cultural signifier, in fact, that it inspires non-Muslims, too…. Of course, the beard is only a sign of righteousness. It is no guarantor, as Mr. Zulfiqar [a Muslim interviewee] reminds us: “I recall one gentleman who came back from a trip to Pakistan and remarked to me, ‘I learned one thing: the longer the beard, the bigger the crook.’ His anticipation was people with big beards would be really honest, but he kept meeting people lying to him” [italics mine].

This comports especially well for Western readers who naturally agree that outer signs of piety certainly do not signify inner piety. Yet they overlook the inadvertent significance of this quote: in Islam, outer signs of piety on the one hand, and corruption and deceit on the other, are perfectly compatible. After all, the same source—Muhammad as recorded in the hadith—that commands Muslims to grow a beard also advocates deception and all sorts of other things hardly associated with Western notions of piety.

Readers must therefore become sensitive to the gradations of clarity in Western reports on Islam. Whereas many of those produced by the non-MSM make an effort to spell things out, the true significance of MSM reports—which are consumed by the majority—must be read between the lines.

Raymond Ibrahim, an Islam-specialist, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum. He writes regularly for Jihad Watch.
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hamas-linked CAIR has called for an investigation. And if any illegal surveillance is going on, it should stop. But Hamas-linked CAIR always opposes anti-terror initiatives. It is just another indication of their true agenda. "Some New York Muslims feel unfairly targeted despite government promises of partnership," from the Associated Press, August 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

NEW YORK — Even as the New York Police Department sent undercover officers into Muslim neighborhoods to detect possible terrorist activities in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks, government officials there and elsewhere have sought to build relationships in Muslim communities and pledged to ensure that Muslims aren’t targeted for discrimination.

Outreach programs have operated in Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Minneapolis, Portland, Ore., and Washington — all have large Muslim communities — while law enforcement around the country has stepped up investigative efforts to stave off attacks.

But the inherent tensions caused by this duality of missions is perhaps most visible in New York. It is the only U.S. city that al-Qaida has successfully attacked twice and continues to be the target of terror plots. New York also is home to the country’s most aggressive local police department investigating counterterrorism.

“It seems to many of the leadership here, there are two kind of authorities they are playing — one is in the forefront which is very cooperative,” said Zaheer Uddin of the Islamic Leadership Council of New York. “And there is another authority, which is playing against Islam and Muslims, going against the First Amendment and the security of this country.”

Uddin asked, “Are we partners, or are we a suspicious community?”

Good question. Let's see. There was Naser Abdo, the would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; and Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; and Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; and Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; and Nidal Hasan, the successful Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; and Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Naveed Haq, the jihad mass murderer at the Jewish Community Center in Seattle; Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; or so many other jihad murderers and would-be murderers in America. Is it reasonable to be suspicious of a community that produces so many people who commit or try to commit acts of violence in the name of that community's religious texts and teachings?

Meanwhile, how have Muslims partnered with law enforcement? Hamas-linked CAIR has told Muslims not to talk to the FBI. Some Muslims have turned in jihad terror plotters to the police, but on the whole the attitude of Muslim communities -- as in this article -- has been an assumption of victim status and suspicion toward the authorities, rather than full and honest cooperation with anti-terror efforts.

A months-long investigation by The Associated Press, published Wednesday, revealed that the NYPD has dispatched teams of undercover officers, known as “rakers,” into minority neighborhoods as part of a human mapping program, according to officials directly involved in the program. They’ve monitored daily life in bookstores, bars, cafes and nightclubs. Police have also used informants, known as “mosque crawlers,” to monitor sermons, even when there’s no evidence of wrongdoing. NYPD officials have scrutinized imams and gathered intelligence on cab drivers and food cart vendors, jobs often done by Muslims.

The NYPD denied that it trolls ethnic neighborhoods and said it only follows leads.

On Wednesday, one Muslim advocacy group urged the Justice Department to investigate the NYPD’s programs in New York Muslim communities as a result of details revealed in the AP’s report.

“These revelations send the message to American Muslims that they are being viewed as a suspect community and that their constitutional rights may be violated with impunity,” said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the [Hamas-linked] Council on American-Islamic Relations. “The Justice Department must initiate an immediate investigation of the civil rights implications of this spy program and the legality of its links to the CIA.”

The Justice Department said it will review the request to investigate.

In the decade since the September 2001 attacks, government officials in New York also have met with Muslim leaders and exchanged cellphone numbers. They’ve attended religious services, dinners and teas, and spoken at community meetings. The FBI recently hosted an event for 500 young Muslims in Brooklyn to build trust and get to know federal law enforcement with a bomb-sniffing dog, scuba boat and helicopter on display.

“I go and visit mosques on a regular basis,” NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly told the AP, adding that he also holds question-and-answer sessions and planned to attend several dinners with members of the Muslim community during the holy month of Ramadan this year.

The police department in 2006 hired Sidique Wai, an African immigrant and member of the New York Muslim community, to coordinate the NYPD’s citywide community outreach program. He said the interaction and outreach between the community and police is unprecedented.

“The majority of the faith-based — particularly the Muslim leaders throughout the city — are absolutely appreciative of the unprecedented relationship with the police department,” Wai said. “I’m not aware of a deliberate effort on the part of NYPD to profile people.”

The former head of the FBI’s field office in New York said he was aggressive and deliberate in reaching out to Muslim communities.

“I know it helped it terms of community relations, a sense of openness and acceptance by the FBI of the community, tamping down the inclination to think they might be singled out or (the) focus of untoward scrutiny,” said Mark Mershon, who ran the office between 2005 and 2008 and is currently a Colorado-based private detective and investigative consultant.

Some Muslim community leaders in New York aren’t satisfied. They have complained about aggressive tactics the department uses to collect intelligence and about a video, “The Third Jihad,” shown earlier this year to some members of the NYPD during a training session. Kelly, the police commissioner, explained in a letter in March that the film was not part of the department’s training program and said it was shown in the background while members of the NYPD were filling out administrative paperwork before a training session.

The video includes images of terror attacks, Osama bin Laden and U.S. Muslim leaders praising the 2001 hijackers, news reports about terror plots and experts talking about the threat of radical Islam. Muslim leaders were outraged by the film because they said it was anti-Islam. [...]

Of course, they say that about any honest treatment of the motives and goals of jihad terrorists.

“There was a time when police would rush into the mosque with their boots on,” Mustapha Senghor, chairman of the Harlem Islamic Cultural Center, said during a July pre-Ramadan conference in New York. “They do not do that anymore. Congratulations, commissioner. For that we thank you, very much.”

“We love you, commissioner,” Senghor said. “You have imams who are extensions of the police force. You include us, you talk to us, you ask us what we are feeling. It makes us feel we are part of the city, and not that people are against us.”

Great. Now what is Mustapha Senghor doing, if anything, to make non-Muslims feel that Muslims aren't against them? Playing the victim game is not going to do the trick.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More activity by a brittle culture that cannot stand dissent and disagreement, and so has to silence its critics by force -- in the West, of course, they do this by defamation and character assassination. More on this story. "More arrests and Bibles seized in Iran," from Christian Today, August 24 (thanks to Amil Imani):

Christians in Iran are facing increasing hostility from authorities in the officially Islamic country.

Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) has received reports that a pastor has been arrested for a second time on August 17.

Abdolreza ‘Matthias’ Haghnejad, a pastor in the evangelical Church of Iran denomination, was reportedly re-arrested by Iranian authorities in Rasht whilst making a pastoral visit.

His family are in the dark about why he has been arrested and his whereabouts.

There are also concerns that he does not have access to an attorney.

Pastor Haghnejad was arrested previously in 2006. Earlier this year, he was charged with activities against the order and rounded up by authorities along with 10 other members of his denomination. He was released when the authorities dropped the charges.

Last month, a Christian man and woman were detained in Iran. The man was released but the woman, Leila Mohammadi, was arrested and is believed to be behind bars in Evin prison....

Earlier this month, the authorities confiscated 6,500 Bibles as they were being transported in the north-western province of Zanjan.

CSW reports that Dr Majid Abhari, adviser to the social issues committee of the Iranian parliament, declared that Christian missionaries were attempting to deceive people, especially the youth, with an expensive propaganda campaign. He also indicated his belief that all religions are strengthening their power to confront Islam.

Rhetoric has turned increasingly anti-Christian in recent months, with one official saying Christians are like the Taliban and "parasites"....

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Israel is the last bastion of democracy in the Middle East.

Once when I was going to Chechnya to interview the President of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, I traveled from Baku along with two Jordanians and one Saudi Arabian.

The Jordanians were young mujahideen who wanted to join the jihad.

They believed that it was the duty of every Muslim to take part in jihad that would liberate the world from the Zionists and infidels. It was two guys, but many before and after them were attending military training camps and were sent to practice in areas where Muslims were waging jihad against the infidels.

They are very bad at speaking Russian, but I learned that they had been sent to Chechnya by one of the very wealthy sponsors of jihad, an old Sheikh who was confined to a wheelchair.

The Sheikh himself could not take part in a "holy war," and so his relatives and friends recruited younger "warriors of Allah" to become mujahideen. The Sheikh prepared them for a "meeting with Allah."

I personally knew one of those people. The Chechen national Vakha Ibragimov engaged in recruiting and transportation of Mujahideen from the Middle East, Iran, and Turkey to the North Caucasus and back.

It was his business. He gathered a group of several dozen people. He arranged for their transportation with a rich Sheikh.

He took 10,000 in U.S. dollars in cash for every Mujahid, and sent them to the North Caucasus.

The Mujahideen who accept participation in jihad until death receive a stipend from the Sheikh. If anyone ever died in battle, they took care of his family.

Vakha Ibragimov certainly made a good living, as the real price of delivery to the destination for each Mujahid was five to seven times less than the amount he took from the sponsor of jihad.

The corrupt power structures of the Caucasian states and Russia let the Mujahideen enter the region without any difficulty. They were not thinking about the consequences: that they themselves could become victims of these jihadists.

As for my third traveling companion, Abdul-Walid, from even a cursory glance you could see that he was a mujahid with experience. He was well versed in all kinds of weapons and explosives. He spoke Russian, English and French fluently. He wore a satellite phone, but never spoke to anyone for more than a minute, and spaced his calls four to five hours apart. He explained to me that if he spoke on the phone for a long time or frequently, the Zionists would discover his location and kill him. He said he did not fear death for the sake of Allah, but he still had unfinished business on earth.

In the woods a few miles from the entrance to a small town in Dagestan, Abdul-Walid and I struck up a conversation about Islam, during which the Arab persistently pressured me to become a Muslim. He said:

"We have not yet finished off the Zionists and their allies. Soon the whole world will see what is the reward of Allah."

"They (the Jews) think that money can buy everything, but the Muslims will prove to them that their money is powerless before the retribution of Allah. Money is not protection against suicide bombers, bombs and missiles."

"Jerusalem belongs to the Muslims. And it will be ours even if the whole world will burn in the fire," said Abdul-Walid.

He showed me two large boxes which were labeled "Koran." He said:

"We have the Koran that tells us what to do. We will restore the Sharia. Allah gave us oil and martyrs. We cannot stop. Soon the whole world will recognize our strength and become Muslim. The only ones will will not convert to Islam will be the Jews, and we will destroy them."

I thought that the Mujahid said that in order to persuade me to accept Islam, but by analyzing his speech today, knowing what is happening NOW in the world, I know that he did not lie.

With well-established channels for the transport of weapons, the Mujahideen, Sharia finance, high oil prices, and the economic expansion of Islam in promoting political tolerance of the jihadists, as well as a massive assault on the people who are critical of the Islamic supremacists, I see that Abdul-Walid was right.

The balance shifted in their direction and the jihadists and their allies began to attack and criticize Israel, the only democratic state constraining Jihad in the Middle East.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

DC-Quake.jpg

Struck down!!!

As far as smitings go, this seems a little phoned-in. They must be salivating over the prospects for Hurricane Irene. But if they're playing that game, one wonders if they've addressed the Somali famine, the 2004 tsunami, and last year's floods in Pakistan while they believe divine wrath is supposedly punishing infidels by knocking over lawn chairs and interrupting cell phone service.

"Online Islamist: East Coast earthquake ‘Allah’s punishment on Americans'," by Jamie Weinstein for The Daily Caller, August 25:

After they finished cowering in fear, most Washingtonians scratched their heads over the unexpected earthquake that shook the city and much of the East Coast at 1:51 p.m. Tuesday. But one online Islamist says there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for the quake: It was a punishment from Allah.
According to a posting titled “Allah’s punishment on Americans” on the Shoumokh Al-Islam jihadi forum by someone writing under the name Abu Ibrahim, “Allah has struck New York and the capital city Washington by an earthquake as a punishment for their disbelief.”
“Such a little earthquake that measured 6.0 has terrified the tyrant American people and forced them to leave their houses and places of work,” Ibrahim continued. The posting was provided to The Daily Caller by The Middle East Media Research Institute, which reasonably noted that it doesn’t find Ibrahim’s rantings particularly important.
Given the minimal damage and the fact that no one lost his life as result of the quake, it is probably fair to assume that the quake was only a minor punishment from Allah. But within that minor punishment, wrote Ibrahim, is a major warning.
“[T]his earthquake is a warning to the crusaders to stop their infidel policy, abandon their crusader religion and convert to the true Islamic religion,” Ibrahim explained. “If they don’t listen and don’t stop, Allah will strike them again by an earthquake or a hurricane. You have no other way but to repent and move away from your path that will take you to the abyss.”
Hurricane Irene is currently hurtling toward the East Coast.
| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

We know Iran is getting help from North Korea (the national orgy of shirk that it is) on missile technology and its nuclear program. One begins to wonder if the DPRK is lending a hand on propaganda, too.

Similar delusions of grandeur, different "great leader." "Iranian Armed Forces: Grounds Ready for Victory over Quds Occupiers," from Fars News Agency (thanks to Twostellas):

TEHRAN (FNA)- The Iranian Armed Forces' Headquarters in a statement said that ongoing revolutions and popular uprisings in the region have prepared the grounds for the creation of a comprehensive Muslim front to clinch a final victory over the Zionist regime and free the holy Quds from the Zionist occupation.
The statement issued on Wednesday called for a massive turnout by the Iranian nation in the International Quds Day rallies on Friday, reminding that the rallies show that the Zionist regime of Israel is sinking in the gulf of Islamic awakening and popular anti-Zionist uprisings.
Initiated by the late Founder of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Imam Khomeini, the International Quds Day is observed on the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan, when Muslims all over the world hold rallies in support of the Palestinian resistance against what Imam Khomeini commonly referred to as "the illegitimate Israeli regime occupying Palestine."
The Iranian Armed Forces Headquarters also said that the serial collapse of the US and Zionist-backed dictatorial regimes has created the potential for the formation of a comprehensive Muslim front against Zionism.
The statement underlined that the recent developments have also provided the grounds and the opportunity for the final victory of the oppressed Palestinian people over the Zionist regime of Israel.

A computer could almost generate these editorials.

Since the beginning of 2011, the region has witnessed an unprecedentedly overwhelming wave of change.
Tunisia saw the overthrow of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in a popular revolution in January, which was soon followed by a revolution which toppled Hosni Mubarak in Egypt in February.
Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Saudi Arabia and Yemen have since been the scene of protests against their totalitarian rulers, who have resorted to brutal crackdown on demonstrations to silence their critics.
In a most recent case of people's victory over tyrannical rulers in the region, the euphoric Libyan revolutionaries seized control of most of Tripoli in a lightning advance a few days ago, celebrating the victory in Green Square, the symbolic heart of Muammar Qaddafi's regime.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How many Muslims does it take to install Sharia in a country? Ten percent, according research shown in the article "Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas." If everybody else is discussing among themselves whether we should save the whales, decrease government spending, or bomb a terrorism funding dictator, and can not agree on central values, ways and goals, the tail can wag the dog:

Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.

“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame." ...

To reach their conclusion, the scientists developed computer models of various types of social networks. One of the networks had each person connect to every other person in the network. The second model included certain individuals who were connected to a large number of people, making them opinion hubs or leaders. The final model gave every person in the model roughly the same number of connections. The initial state of each of the models was a sea of traditional-view holders. Each of these individuals held a view, but were also, importantly, open minded to other views.

Once the networks were built, the scientists then “sprinkled” in some true believers throughout each of the networks. These people were completely set in their views and unflappable in modifying those beliefs. As those true believers began to converse with those who held the traditional belief system, the tides gradually and then very abruptly began to shift.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Below, Thomas notes the apparent contradiction in Libya's draft constitution between the stated respect for religious freedom and women's rights and the institution of Sharia as the highest law of the land. But even those statements about rights, quoted below, are awkwardly, vaguely worded. They have covered their bases with generalities, but Sharia will determine the specifics. Non-Muslims will have all of the rights they "ought" to... within the limits of Sharia law. Women will have all of the rights to participate in society that they "ought" to... within the limits of Sharia law.

The question of the exact implementation of Sharia is now enshrined as a ticking time bomb in the new Libyan state, and the matter of how much is "enough" will be a source of perpetual instability. Someone will always want more Sharia and be willing to kill and overthrow governments for it.

Since Sharia is now the benchmark of political credibility, we're guaranteed the new Libya won't stop at "just a little." While the West crosses its fingers for the vaporware, academic-exercise Sharia that could/would/should exist and respect human rights, repudiate cruel and unusual punishments, and unequivocally affirm legal equality between men and women and Muslims and non-Muslims, we're much more likely to get the production model than the neato prototype on the drawing board.

As Thomas also notes, and we also have noted many times, wherever Sharia has been put into practice, human rights suffer, and they suffer badly.

"Thomas: Arab and Islamic states do not change their ways," by Cal Thomas for The Town Talk, August 25 (thanks to Twostellas):

Name a single Arab or Islamic state, which, after a revolution that has overthrown a dictator, came to embrace political pluralism, religious tolerance and equal rights for women.
You can't.
The U.S. State Department publishes an annual report on human rights practices in Arab states (www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/). It consistently finds all are ruled by variations of dictatorial regimes that oppress people, deny basic freedoms of press, speech, due process and are intolerant of any faith other than Islam, punishing converts to other faiths (a capital offense in some Islamic nations) and anyone who shares other faiths with their people.

The death penalty for apostasy from Islam comes from Muhammad's own orders.

The Arab Human Development Report, sponsored by the United Nations Development Programme and authored by Arab scholars, examined the world's seven regions. It ranks Arab countries lowest according to their "freedom score."
After months of uprisings in Arab nations from Egypt to Yemen, we are now faced with one in Libya, which appears to have ousted Moammar Gadhafi. As with the other nations engaged in revolution, what follows is yet to be determined. So is a judgment on whether the replacements will be any better.
In Libya, the National Transition Council has published online what purports to be a draft constitution for the new state. It contains much that sounds good and at least one section that ought to be cause for serious concern. The good stuff includes "guarantees," such as, "The state shall guarantee for woman all opportunities which shall allow her to participate entirely and actively in political, economic and social spheres." And "The State shall guarantee for non-Muslims the freedom of practicing religious rights and shall guarantee respect for their systems of personal status."
There is much else to commend in the draft constitution, but then there is this: "Islam is the religion of the State and the principal source of legislation is Islamic Jurisprudence (Sharia)."
The legal system in Saudi Arabia is based on Sharia law. More than two-dozen other countries operate according to at least some aspects of Sharia law. None of them is known for any of the principles stated in the pluralistic-sounding Libyan draft constitution. By their fruits you shall know them and the fruit in countries where Sharia law is the legal standard is rotten when it comes to tolerance, religious pluralism, an independent press and equal rights.
It is no jump to an unwarranted conclusion to say if Sharia law is the objective of the TNC, as expressed in its draft constitution, none of the other high-sounding principles are likely to be achieved, much less guaranteed.
None of the nations now experiencing revolutions or unrest have a history of democracy, freedom or human rights. That's because they believe in a god who wants his followers to violently impose their religious beliefs on others.
Former Libyan justice minister Mustafa Mohammed Abdul Jalil, who heads the NTC, said after resigning his post in protest over Gadhafi's shooting of civilian demonstrators, "We are the same as people in other countries, and are looking for the same things."
That remains to be seen. Based on the direction of revolutions in other Arab states and their history, I'm not persuaded.
By the way, since nations are unfreezing Libyan assets and the country is awash in oil, can we send the NTC a bill for the help we've given them, directly and through NATO? That would help lower our national debt. This is a practice we should apply to other countries seeking our assistance.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Muslims For Liberty sounds like just what everyone is waiting for: the latest Great Moderate Hope. There's just one catch: they don't seem to care very much for the truth. "Tea Party Muslims shatter all preconceptions," by Davi Barker for the Libertarian Examiner, August 24:

Muslims are terrorists that hate America’s freedom... right?

Straw man, of course. I have never said such a thing, and no one I know has, either.

And the Tea Party are right-wing Christian extremists that hate Muslims... right?

Opposing jihad and Islamic supremacism is not hating Muslims. Those who contend that it is are invariably people who want to destroy opposition to jihad and Islamic supremacism.

So, “Tea Party Muslim” must be a contradiction in terms, like “military intelligence” or “honest politician.” Well, that may be what the mainstream media would have you believe. After all, conflict sells. But one group is proving that Muslims and the Tea Party may have more in common than you think.

William Coley describes himself as “your average camo wearing, bow hunting, East Tennessee redneck,” except... he’s also the director of Muslims for Liberty, a group of Muslims and non Muslims of a liberty minded ideology fighting to change the perception of Islam in America, and offer tools to conservatives and libertarians who want the facts about Islam without all the sensationalized rhetoric we get in the mainstream media. [...]

Muslims for Liberty is currently focused on confronting the most vociferous anti Muslim voices in America, like Pam Geller, Zuhdi Jasser, Robert Spencer and others, and demanding that they prove what they claim.

I can easily prove what I claim. My books are extensively footnoted, sourced from Islamic texts and spokesmen. And I am not "anti Muslim": again, opposing jihad and Islamic supremacism is not hating Muslims. Those who contend that it is are invariably people who want to destroy opposition to jihad and Islamic supremacism.

Coley says:
“We have people on our staff with knowledge of Islam, knowledge of fiqh, knowledge of Sharia... We want an opportunity to expose these people for the fraud that they are, and show that they are spreading anti Muslim hysteria for profit in our society.“

So far, most of these so called “Sharia experts” have rejected his invitations which he believes is because they know that if they debate anyone with credentials it will expose them as charlatans.

You can find Muslims for Liberty on facebook, or email William Coley directly at muslimsforliberty@yahoo.com

I am not in touch with Jasser, but I contacted Pamela Geller and asked her if she had ever heard from a William Coley or anyone else from a group called Muslims For Liberty, challenging her to debate. She hadn't. And I haven't, either. So "most" of "these so called 'Sharia experts'" have not rejected his invitation to debate at all. He hasn't actually issued an invitation to debate to at least two of the three people he mentioned. He is, in short, lying.

If he does have the guts to debate me and suffer the fate of Zayed, I will happily debate him.

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Nuclear-armed North Korea is helping Iran with its ballistic missile program. The ironically named Democratic People's Republic of Korea is also helping Iran with its nuclear program. Are we really to believe the collaboration on these two projects is a coincidence? "'N. Korea supplied Iran with nuclear computer software'," from Reuters, August 24:

BERLIN - North Korea has supplied Iran with a computer program as part of intensified cooperation that could help Tehran build nuclear weapons, a German newspaper reported on Wednesday, citing Western intelligence sources.
The Sueddeutsche Zeitung said North Korea had in the spring delivered software, originally developed in the United States, that could simulate neutron flows.
Such calculations, linked to identifying a chain reaction, are vital in the construction of reactors and also in the development of nuclear explosives.
With the help of the program, Iran could gain important knowledge of how to construct nuclear weapons, according to the Munich newspaper, which quoted no individual source.
A confidential UN report earlier this year said North Korea and Iran appeared to have been regularly exchanging ballistic missile technology in violation of UN sanctions.

Geographical distance and a shared hatred of America, along with North Korea's desperate poverty, are major reasons that the relationship works. If they were neighbors, the countries' respective ideologies would demand each other's annihilation.

On Tuesday, an Iranian envoy said a senior UN nuclear watchdog official visited all of Iran's main atomic sites during a rare five-day tour last week, saying this showed Tehran's "100 percent transparency and openness."
But a Western diplomat in Vienna said the trip of Herman Nackaerts, deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to Iran "did nothing to lay to rest key concerns" about Tehran's nuclear programme.
"The Iranians proudly showed off many nuclear activities (that Iran carries out) in defiance of UN sanctions ... but stonewalled the IAEA on the scale and scope of the possible military dimensions of their program," the diplomat said.
The Sueddeutsche said the computer program, called Monte Carlo N-Particle Extended, or MCNPX 2.6.0., was used widely for civilian purposes but is subject to strict export controls because it can also be used to develop atomic bombs.
It is unclear how North Korea got hold of the software.
The paper said a North Korean delegation travelled to Iran in February to train 20 Defense Ministry staff in the software.

Not an energy or commerce-related ministry, but defense.

The IAEA has voiced growing concern in the last year about possible military dimensions to Tehran's nuclear program, saying it had received new information increasing such concerns....
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As noted below, al-Shabaab is not alone in seeking to benefit from piracy. In particular, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula has also taken an interest, as have Iran's Revolutionary Guards. "Maritime Jihad," by Ryan Mauro for Frontpage Magazine, August 24:

In February, four Americans were held for ransom by Somali pirates and executed. The pirates have the viciousness, skills and assets to bring havoc to the seas for a price, and Islamist terrorists are willing to pay. The U.S. commander for Africa predicts that Al-Qaeda will team up with the pirate gangs, as terrorist groups see maritime targets as a weak point for their enemies.
The U.S. commander overseeing Africa, General Carter Ham, confirms that the Al-Qaeda affiliate in Somalia, al-Shabaab, is making money from piracy off the coast of East Africa. He predicts that Al-Qaeda will directly become involved with the Somali pirates if the problem is not tackled. Pirate activity sharply increased in 2008, coinciding with advances by al-Shabaab. The partnership between the pirates and terrorists is usually not one of ideological affinity, but of business and sometimes, coercion. For example, in February, al-Shabaab members forced a group of pirates to give them 20 percent of what they earn from ransoms. "They demanded we allow six of their fighters to board each of our hijacked ships. We have not left our houses…Worse, we are constantly receiving threatening text messages," one pirate said.
In April 2008, a group of Somali pirates got paid a $1.2 million ransom to let a Spanish fishing vessel and 26 hostages go free. Al-Shabaab received five percent of the payment. Predictably, such payments to the pirates encouraged them to continue their profitable practices. There have been dozens of hijackings, hostage-takings and raids since, appeasing the pirates and indirectly financing terrorists. In April 2009, former ambassador to Ethiopia and expert on East Africa, David H. Shinn, said that al-Shabaab sometimes receives a protection fee from the pirates of 5 to 10 percent. If the group trains the pirates, it earns 20 percent. If the Al-Qaeda affiliate finances the entire operation, the commission is as high as 50 percent.
In July 2009, Somali officials said that al-Shabaab was hiring pirates to smuggle in members of Al-Qaeda to the country. It was said that up to 1,000 foreign jihadists had been brought in that year. In some cases, the jihadists view the pirates as soldiers defending Islam. In 2008, a leader of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula said to the Somali pirates, "[T]ake caution and prepare yourselves…Increase your strikes against the Crusaders at sea and in Djibouti." A spokesman for al-Shabaab praised them for "protecting the coast against the enemies of Allah." Another group tied to Al-Qaeda, the Ras Kamboni Brigades, said they are "part of the Mujahideen" even if they are unsavory "money-seekers."
According to Jane's Intelligence Review, the pirates and terrorists work together in arms trafficking, and the Somali pirates are helping al-Shabaab develop maritime capabilities. Al-Shabaab is using hijacked cargo ships to train its operatives in their use. This poses a serious threat to maritime traffic, and a successful attack would have a major economic impact. The Somali Prime Minister made the point in March, "Why bother with a small plane when you can capture a tanker?"
It is hard to understand why there is debate over whether there is a link between the pirates and terrorists. As the Long War Journal said,"The pirates and terrorists are often one in the same, or if not, are in close cooperation." The Al-Qaeda affiliate in the Philippines, Abu Sayyaf, has worked with another affiliate, Jemaah Islamiyah, to give their operatives scuba diving training and other instruction for maritime attacks. India's intelligence service has confirmed a linkage between terrorists and pirates in the Indian Ocean. Lashkar-e-Taiba has set up a branch in Karachi, Pakistan specifically devoted to maritime terrorism.
Joseph Tenaglia, CEO of Tactical Defense Concepts, a maritime security group, told FrontPage that"Jihadist groups have come to see piracy as a lucrative means to fund their activities."
"There are reports of illicit funds emanating from piracy in Somalia moving through banks in Yemen to other Middle Eastern countries. There have been several reports of Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps involvement in piracy and threats to shipping vessels in the region," Tenaglia said.
According to an associate of Tactical Defense Concepts with extensive experience in the Middle East, "Al Qaeda in the Yemen has a growing interest in hijacking tankers in particular because it would give them independence from relying on donations."
Targeting al-Shabaab in Somalia is necessary, but it will not put an end to the growing threat of piracy and terrorist involvement in the activity. As long as it remains a profitable endeavor, it will be attractive to criminals and terrorists alike. One of the problems is that crews are rarely armed to defend themselves.
"The fact is that an armed vessel has never been taken by pirates," Tenaglia said. "Increased violence and resulting financial losses are causing a change of opinion. Many shipping companies are finally giving their vessels armed protect, usually with trained security teams."...
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There is also the matter of Gadhafi's chemical weapons stockpiles. Together with the radiological materials, they could make for the jihadist garage sale of the century, matched only by a similar potential scenario in Syria. "Nuclear experts warn of Libya "dirty bomb" material," from Reuters, August 24:

A research center near Tripoli has stocks of nuclear material that could be used to make a "dirty bomb," a former senior U.N. inspector said on Wednesday, warning of possible looting during turmoil in Libya.
Seeking to mend ties with the West, Libya's Muammar Gaddafi agreed in 2003 to abandon efforts to acquire nuclear, chemical and biological weapons -- a move that brought him in from the cold and helped end decades of Libyan isolation.

We may find out now if he had a backup plan, or how thorough he really was in disarming.

A six-month popular insurgency has now forced Gaddafi to abandon his stronghold in the Libyan capital but continued gunfire suggests the rebels have not completely triumphed yet.
Olli Heinonen, head of U.N. nuclear safeguards inspections worldwide until last year, pointed to substantial looting that took place at Iraq's Tuwaitha atomic research facility near Baghdad after Saddam Hussein was toppled in 2003.
In Iraq, "most likely due to pure luck, the story did not end in a radiological disaster," Heinonen said.
In Libya, "nuclear security concerns still linger," the former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in an online commentary. Libya's uranium enrichment program was dismantled after Gaddafi renounced weapons of mass destruction eight years ago. Sensitive material and documentation including nuclear weapons design information were confiscated.
But the country's Tajoura research center continues to stock large quantities of radioisotopes, radioactive waste and low-enriched uranium fuel after three decades of nuclear research and radioisotope production, Heinonen said.
Refined uranium can have civilian as well as military purposes, if enriched much further.
"While we can be thankful that the highly enriched uranium stocks are no longer in Libya, the remaining material in Tajoura could, if it ended up in the wrong hands, be used as ingredients for dirty bombs," Heinonen, now at Harvard University, said....
| No Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ceasefires aren't intended to last under Islamic law, but the Gaza jihadists seem to be trying for a new record for the briefest truce each time. More on this story. "IDF strikes targets in Gaza in response to rocket salvoes," from the Jerusalem Post, August 25:

The IAF struck targets in northern and southern Gaza Wednesday night in response to rocket from terrorists in the Strip, the IDF Spokesman's Office announced in a statement.
"During a night air assault weapons a storage site in northern Gaza and tunnel used for smuggling and weapons manufacturing in the southern Gaza Strip" were struck, the statement said, adding that a direct hits were identitified.
Palestinian sources claimed an Israeli air strike targeted an Islamic Jihad sports facility, and killed two people there.
Earlier, the Iron Dome missile defense system intercepted a rocket that was fired toward Beersheba and two rockets that were fired toward Ashkelon.
A nine-month-old girl was lightly wounded in the hand when a Grad-type rocket scored a direct hit on an empty car south of Ashkelon.
The baby was outdoors with a parent when the rocket struck an empty vehicle nearby, causing the injury. The vehicle caught fire and the baby was taken for medical treatment.
The late evening salvo of more than 10 rockets came after three days of quiet, since Hamas declared Gazan groups would stop launching rockets at Israel on Sunday night.
Earlier Wednesday, at least seven rockets hit near Ashkelon and in Ofakim. The rockets were believed to be fired by Islamic Jihad, supposedly in response to an Israel Air Force air strike earlier in the day that killed a senior operative who the IDF said was planning attacks against Israel from the Sinai Peninsula.
Four rockets struck in the Eshkol Regional Council and another two hit open land near Ofakim shortly after another rocket fell in an open field north of the Gaza Strip near Ashkelon. No one was injured in the strikes.
The IDF had prepared for the rocket fire following the air strike against the Islamic Jihad operative and canceled the Briza Festival in Ashkelon that was scheduled for Wednesday night.
In what appeared to be part of an IDF response to the renewed rocket fire, the IAF bombed an Islamic Jihad rocket cell in Gaza City. Palestinians reported one dead and several wounded.
Later in the day, two more terrorists were killed in air strikes against rocket cells.
Palestinian news agency Ma’an said the first man killed was Ismail al-Asmar, a field commander in the Al-Quds Brigade, the Islamic Jihad’s “military wing.” A spokesman for a medical service run by Hamas said two other people were wounded in the strike.
“Israel will pay a heavy price for this crime,” the Al-Quds Brigade said in a statement.
Defense officials said that the IDF would continue to strike at terror cells that it spotted preparing to fire rockets into Israel, and against terrorists who it knew, according to intelligence information, were in the midst of planning attacks against Israel, as it did on Wednesday morning.
“This could lead to another escalation in rocket fire, but the IDF will not stand by as Israelis are attacked,” one official said....
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 24, 2011

More glories of the Arab Spring from the genocide-minded, Nazi-loving Egyptian demonstrators. "‘Zionist Envoy, Leave Egypt or Die,' Demonstrators Demand," by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu for Israel National News, August 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

[...] “Revolution,” cried out Muslim Brotherhood activists. “Revolution is stronger than the Zionist attackers. The entire Egyptian people are Hamas.”

One hostile placard threatened that the ambassador must “get out [of Egypt] or die here.”

The demonstrators also proclaimed, “Oh Zionist traitor, blood and fire are between you and us.“ They charged that “Zionists mock us with calls for peace, and their principles offend Muslim [sic].”...

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Good thing Hamas declared this ceasefire, eh? War Is Deceit, after all. "7 rockets hit south; IDF retaliates," from Ynet News, August 24:

Rockets explode near Ashkelon, Ofakim and Eshkol Council after Islamic Jihad vows to avenge death of terrorist in IAF air strike. No injuries reported. IAF targets Islamic Jihad terrorist cell in Gaza, kills one

The Israel-Hamas ceasefire was breached again Wednesday as seven rockets hit southern communities. A rocket fired from the northern Gaza Strip exploded in an open field south of Ashkelon Wednesday evening. Minutes later, two additional rockets hit an open area near Ofakim. Shortly thereafter, two other rockets landed near the Eshkol Regional Council, which later saw two extra Qassam landings....

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Hamas-linked group eats up your taxes" In WorldNetDaily, August 23, Pamela Geller discusses a disturbing program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture:

The line between mosque and state continues to blur under the Obama administration.

What happened to the foundational principle of separation of religion and state? Do we not even so much as pretend anymore? The White House's official website Aug. 10 posted a story entitled "Islamic Relief USA Starts Its First Summer Food Service Program," boasting that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is now helping this Islamic group get its program started. What kind of help is the USDA giving to Jewish and Christian charitable groups? Islamic Relief USA has ties to Hamas. How many other groups with ties to terror organizations are working with the USDA? And why is the United States government subjugating itself in this way?

The story featured a photo with the caption: "Max Finberg, Director of the Center for Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships at USDA, and IRUSA's Abed Ayoub cut the ribbon launching summer feeding program at An Nur (Photo courtesy of IRUSA)." Reporter Marissa Duswalt quoted Kareema Dickens, the principal of An Nur School in Lanham, Md., as giving "heartfelt remarks." Dickens said: "We are very grateful to USDA for helping us feed our students this summer and letting us know about this wonderful program. We hope to continue this partnership and serve meals to our students throughout the year."

I equate "Islamic Relief" with dhimmi pain. This is jizya, the poll tax imposed upon non-Muslims by their "Islamic betters," who are commanded by the Quran to make sure that the dhimmis pay it with "willing submission" and "feel themselves subdued" (9:29).

Islamic Relief USA is a spinoff of Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW), which is headed up by Dr. Hani Al-Banna. Al-Banna was formerly with the Muslim Aid (MA), a London-based Islamic "charity" based in London that was a "partner organization" with the Al-Salah Islamic Association, a Hamas fundraising machine headed up by Ahmed Al-Kurd, whom the U.S. government officially designated as a terrorist. Muslim Aid also worked with groups linked to Jamaat-e-Islami, the Muslim Brotherhood of Pakistan.

IRW received $50,000 from a front for Osama bin Laden in 1999, and has given millions to the jihadists in Chechnya. And IRW official Iyaz Ali has admitted to aiding Hamas while serving as project coordinator at IRW's Gaza branch in late 2005 and early 2006. Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that "incriminating files were found on Ali's computer, including documents that attested to the organization's ties with illegal Hamas funds abroad (in the U.K. and in Saudi Arabia) and in Nablus. Also found were photographs of swastikas superimposed on IDF [Israeli Defense Force] symbols, [as well as photos] of senior Nazi German officials, of Osama bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, as well as many photographs of Hamas military activities."

Read it all.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There are so many weird aspects of this story. Don't these Marines have mothers, or someone in their lives who told them as children that audible passing of gas was offensive? And the high command has to tell them to cut it out because it offends Afghans, as if such a reaction were different from that of any normal person? And unfortunately, the friendly-fire jihad attacks by Afghans that regularly punctuate the working relationship between U.S. and Afghan troops are not going to be ended by this small gesture in "trust building." "For Marines in Afghanistan: be careful where you fart," by Gina Cavallaro in Military Times, August 23 (thanks to David):

Marine Corps Times is a family newspaper and we only rarely have offensive language in our stories.

But this week the word “fart” appears in a story I wrote about the importance of trust between Marines and the Afghan national army soldiers they work with.

I didn’t want to write this little blog entry about farts. It’s not even on my beat. But my colleague Dan Lamothe, whose byline you have seen here quite often, shamed me into it.

“You owe it to all Marines,” he told me.

So here’s the news: audible farting has been banned for some Marines downrange because it offends the Afghans.

I know there are many things in the Afghan culture that don’t seem normal to Americans and it’s hard to spend seven months working in someone else’s back yard. Still, the Marines I saw downrange are doing a pretty good job at trying to do the right thing around the Afghans.

They’re not supposed to cuss because it could be misunderstood (that one goes out the window a lot). And they stay away from talking about politics, religion or girls because those topics could escalate into major disagreements (they can’t communicate anyway because of the language barrier).

But farting? That’s practically a sport. Ok, it’s not soccer, but a good contest could open the door for cross-cultural exchanges, jokes and other gallows humor....

| 74 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Of course, this topic is largely off-limits for discussion for fear of the appearance of "Islamophobia," on one hand, and for fear of sparking riots in the afflicted areas of European cities on the other. "European 'No-Go' Zones for Non-Muslims Proliferating," by Soeren Kern for Hudson New York, August 22 (thanks to RK):

Islamic extremists are stepping up the creation of "no-go" areas in European cities that are off-limits to non-Muslims.
Many of the "no-go" zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.
The "no-go" areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations.
In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against the Crusades has launched a campaign to turn twelve British cities – including what it calls "Londonistan" – into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic Sharia law and operate entirely outside British jurisprudence.
The Islamic Emirates Project names the British cities of Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, as well as Waltham Forest in northeast London and Tower Hamlets in East London as territories to be targeted for blanket Sharia rule.
In the Tower Hamlets area of East London (also known as the Islamic Republic of Tower Hamlets), for example, extremist Muslim preachers, called the Tower Hamlets Taliban, regularly issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Islamic veils. Neighborhood streets have been plastered with posters declaring "You are entering a Sharia controlled zone: Islamic rules enforced." And street advertising deemed offensive to Muslims is regularly vandalized or blacked out with spray paint.
In the Bury Park area of Luton, Muslims have been accused of "ethnic cleansing" by harassing non-Muslims to the point that many of them move out of Muslim neighborhoods. In the West Midlands, two Christian preachers have been accused of "hate crimes" for handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. In Leytonstone in east London, the Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying: "How dare you come to a Muslim area."
In France, large swaths of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered "no-go" zones by French police. At last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.
Muslim immigrants are taking control of other parts of France too. In Paris and other French cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse, thousands of Muslims are closing off streets and sidewalks (and by extension, are closing down local businesses and trapping non-Muslim residents in their homes and offices) to accommodate overflowing crowds for Friday prayers. Some mosques have also begun broadcasting sermons and chants of "Allahu Akbar" via loudspeakers into the streets.
The weekly spectacles, which have been documented by dozens of videos posted on Youtube.com [links at the Hudson NY site above], and which have been denounced as an "occupation without tanks or soldiers," have provoked anger and disbelief. But despite many public complaints, local authorities have declined to intervene because they are afraid of sparking riots.
In the Belgian capital of Brussels (which is 20% Muslim), several immigrant neighborhoods have become "no-go" zones for police officers, who frequently are pelted with rocks by Muslim youth. In the Kuregem district of Brussels, which often resembles an urban war zone, police are forced to patrol the area with two police cars: one car to carry out the patrols and another car to prevent the first car from being attacked. In the Molenbeek district of Brussels, police have been ordered not to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in public during the Islamic month of Ramadan.
In Germany, Chief Police Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut, in an August 1 interview with the newspaper Der Westen, revealed that Muslim immigrants are imposing "no-go" zones in cities across Germany at an alarming rate.
The interviewer asked Witthaut: "Are there urban areas – for example in the Ruhr – districts and housing blocks that are "no-go areas," meaning that they can no longer be secured by the police?" Witthaut replied: "Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with the police car and where, even initially, only with the personnel carrier. The reason is that our colleagues can no longer feel safe there in twos, and have to fear becoming the victim of a crime themselves. We know that these areas exist. Even worse: in these areas crimes no longer result in charges. They are left 'to themselves.' Only in the worst cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is completely out of the picture."
In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers. In Bologna, Muslims repeatedly have threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante's Inferno which depicts Mohammed being tormented in hell.
In the Netherlands, a Dutch court ordered the government to release to the public a politically incorrect list of 40 "no-go" zones in Holland. The top five Muslim problem neighborhoods are in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht. The Kolenkit area in Amsterdam is the number one Muslim "problem district" in the country. The next three districts are in Rotterdam – Pendrecht, het Oude Noorden and Bloemhof. The Ondiep district in Utrecht is in the fifth position, followed by Rivierenwijk (Deventer), Spangen (Rotterdam), Oude Westen (Rotterdam), Heechterp/ Schieringen (Leeuwarden) and Noord-Oost (Maastricht).
In Sweden, which has some of the most liberal immigration laws in Europe, large swaths of the southern city of Malmö – which is more than 25% Muslim – are "no-go" zones for non-Muslims. Fire and emergency workers, for example, refuse to enter Malmö's mostly Muslim Rosengaard district without police escorts. The male unemployment rate in Rosengaard is estimated to be above 80%. When fire fighters attempted to put out a fire at Malmö's main mosque, they were attacked by stone throwers.
In the Swedish city of Gothenburg, Muslim youth have been hurling petrol bombs at police cars. In the city's Angered district [how appropriate - ed.], where more than 15 police cars have been destroyed, teenagers have also been pointing green lasers at the eyes of police officers, some of whom have been temporarily blinded.
In Gothenburg's Backa district, youth have been throwing stones at patrolling officers. Gothenburg police have also been struggling to deal with the problem of Muslim teenagers burning cars and attacking emergency services in several areas of the city.
According to the Malmö-based Imam Adly Abu Hajar: "Sweden is the best Islamic state."
| 51 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Recent events in Malaysia -- i.e. various outrages and provocations committed by Muslims officially or non-officially towards non Muslims -- have, as is often delicately put, 'raised tensions' between Malaysian Muslims and its various non Muslim minorities. More specifically, these recent events have exposed the fiction that Malaysia is one 'harmonious' multi-ethnic and multi-religious society as being more phony than ever.

The Official Malaysian-Muslim Establishment has responded in two ways: first, by promising an 'investigation' into biggest recent outrage, namely the recent inspection of a church by the Islamic religious police (which may or may not involve or talk to the 'infidels' who actually own the church that was raided in the first place), and secondly, a propaganda offensive via the vetted government-approved mainstream media. The best and brightest of the Malays are on the case, and what one of them has to say may surprise you. Or perhaps not. From "Forging unity through religion", by Dr. Chandra Muzaffar, The Star, 24 August 2011:

Universal values shared by all religions should be the fount of unity in a multi-religious society.

Is religion in multi-religious Malaysia a force for unity or disunity? This is an important question to ask at this juncture since religion has assumed tremendous significance in the public arena in recent times.

In the first decade and a half of our independence, religion was not perceived as a hindrance to national unity. The Constitution recognised Islam as the religion of the Federation.

It was an affirmation of the identity of the new nation which had evolved from Muslim Sultanates. If this identity was not acknowledged, the Malay-Muslim populace would have felt that the Malaysian state had not taken cognisance of their identity as a people.

Of course, then as now, violence would have resulted, and does result, whenever the Malay-Muslims feel that their Islamic identity is in any way infringed or 'threatened'. And it doesn't take much for that to happen -- all a Christian has to do is say 'Allah' a few times, and before you know it, churches start going up in flames. But I digress.

However, the relatively tension free coexistence among the majority and minority religious communities of the first 15 years, began to witness some strains from the 1980s onwards.

This is about the same time that a certain infamous Malaysian, terrorist apologist and notorious anti Semite named Mahathir Mohamad became Prime Minister. Coincidence?

Often, in situations like this where interaction gives rise to friction, segments within a religious community become more conscious of religious boundaries. Any breach of what is sometimes an artificially constructed boundary arouses passions and heightens tensions.
Yup, that 'friction' just mysteriously arises. Passions get 'aroused'. Never mind which religious group that is always getting riled up and 'aroused' in the first place.
There will be no solution to controversies such as child conversion as long as one accords primacy to religious injunctions that have developed over time rather than the perennial values and principles of the Quran.

Which Quranic values is our wise Doctor referring to? The slaying of infidels wherever they are found? The beating of women? Does he mean those values?

Anyway, the good Doctor soon dispenses with his monkeyshine and warms to his main theme -- all these 'religious tensions' that keep arising between Muslims and everyone else in Malaysia are not the fault of Muslims at all.

If a certain mindset within a segment of the Muslim population is a barrier to national unity, so is a certain movement within the growing Christian community. Evangelical Christians determined to spread Christianity are becoming more zealous.

Non-Muslim communities are their main targets in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak. But there is increasing evidence to suggest that Malays are also being approached in spite of the constitutional provision that restricts “the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.”

Of course! Muslims reserve the right to proselytize to everybody everywhere (which in this country is funded by infidels), but the Evangelical Christians dare to demand the same? Outrageous! Religious freedom for us, for not for unbelievers -- our religion forbids it. To a Muslim, the Golden Rule is apparently for suckers.

The evangelical push in Malaysia and other parts of the world has a lot to do with the rise of what is broadly described as the Christian Right in the United States.

For the Christian Right exporting their brand of the religion serves to strengthen the global hegemonic power of the US.

When in doubt, blame America, and you're never wrong.

As Iain Buchannan shows in his superb academic study of this movement entitled “The Armies of God”, converting Muslims to Christianity is one of the evangelist's cherished goals.

Since Muslims worldwide have always resisted conversion, the tactics employed are more subtle and sophisticated.

Many Christian groups in Malaysia and other countries are opposed to this sort of evangelism.

Christians dare to convert Muslims using peaceful methods? How culturally insensitive! But let's hope this Buchannan fellow is correct. And speaking of conversion, if Muslims are so resistant to it, as the author claims, then why are Muslims and Muslim governments everywhere so touchy about 'protecting Muslims' from 'corrupt infidel beliefs'? After all, that's why the Malaysian government banned Muslims from practicing yoga a few years ago. As for the local Christians, they apparently meet with the Doctor's approval for being tame and truly dhimmified.

They know that it is not only a betrayal of the essence of Jesus' message of love, compassion and justice but also inimical to harmonious relations among different religious communities. They emphasise universal values shared by Christianity, Islam and other religions.

It is these shared values that should be the fount of unity in a multi-religious society.

They underscore our common humanity. If religions through the deeds of their adherents bring forth our common humanity, they will help forge unity in this land that we call our home.

> Dr Chandra Muzaffar is chairman of the board of trustees, Yayasan 1Malaysia and Professor of Global Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

This Muslim has the unbelievable chutzpah to tell evangelical Christians -- and all Christians, really -- that they misunderstand Jesus' message. Apparently, to this so-called doctor, the only 'real' Christians are the ones that meekly submit to church 'inspections', second class status, and the overriding agenda of Islamic supremacy.

If this taqiyya master 'doctor' Muzaffar wants 'unity', then the only unity he plainly seeks is the kind with a distinctly Islamic hue.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Concerns linger over Delta's relationship with Saudi Arabian Airlines. It is eminently reasonable to scrutinize dealings between an American company and the flagship airline of a brutal, oppressive regime. "Delta Airlines Signs Letter Promising to Not Ask Customers Their Religious Affiliation," from Fox News, August 23 (thanks to Kenneth):

Delta Airlines denied allegations Tuesday that it currently, or will in the future, ask customers to state their religion before boarding a flight.
In a letter to the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish museum in Los Angeles, the company said its employees will not seek information regarding religious affiliation “on behalf of any SkyTeam partner.”
The controversy began in June, when the airline reportedly entered an agreement with Saudi Arabia that critics said could potentially prohibit American Jews from flying into the country.
Delta, which has been trying to build its Middle East brand, immediately denied the charges. The Saudi Arabian Embassy in Washington also told Fox News that allegations that Jews are not allowed in the country are “complete nonsense.”
But some critics said Saudi Arabia maintains a longstanding policy of religious discrimination. These critics questioned the airline’s new relationship with Saudi Arabian Airlines, which joined the 14-member SkyTeam Alliance.
Critics also say the Saudi government requires travelers to disclose their religion, and a Delta spokesperson said that the airline “must comply with all applicable laws in every country it serves.”
The statement was seen by some as a capitulation from the airline.
The company was the focal point of an open letter written by Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, that appeared on FoxNews.com.
“What would happen if a leading U.S. carrier voluntarily allows itself to be hijacked by bigots in order to open a new market?” Cooper asked. “For example, what if it entered into an agreement with a foreign airline that would see to it that no blacks or Catholics or gays boarded code-shared flights destined to reach the partner’s home nation?
“I think you know the answer,” he wrote.
After the article was published, Delta officials met with Cooper in Los Angeles. Cooper later said that Delta "has now" done the right thing.
"We hope that all other U.S.-based airlines and around the world will declare and follow a similar policy," the statement said.
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Where is the outrage over that? Double standards abound. As the Israeli envoy Dan Gillerman said in 2008: "When Christians kill Muslims, it's the Crusades. When Jews kill Muslims it's murder, and when Muslims kill Muslims, it's like talking about the weather. Nobody really cares about it."

And as the late Samuel P. Huntington observed: "Wherever one looks along the perimeter of Islam, Muslims have problems living peaceably with their neighbors. The question naturally rises as to whether this pattern of the late 20th century conflict between Muslim and non-Muslim groups is equally true of relations between groups from other civilizations. In fact, it is not. Muslims make up 1/5 of the world's population but in the 1990s they have been far more involved in intergroup violence than the people of any other civilization....Islam's borders are bloody, and so are its innards."

Note also the Ahmadinejadesque (to coin a new term) rhetoric from Turkey's Erdogan. "Why Golda Meir was right," by Burak Bekdil for the Hurriyet Daily News, August 23 (thanks to Joshua):

It has been more than two and a half years since Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan told to Israeli President Shimon Peres’s face, “You (Jews) know well how to kill.” Prime Minister Erdoğan has also declared more than a few times that the main obstacle to peace in this part of the world is Israel, once calling the Jewish state “a festering boil in the Middle East that spreads hate and enmity.” In this holy month of Ramadan full of blood on Muslim territories, let’s try to identify who are the ones who know well how to kill.
As the Syrian death count clicks every day to come close to 2,000, the Turkish-Kurdish death count does not stop, already over 40,000 since 1984, both adding to the big pool of blood called the Middle East. Only during this Ramadan, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK’s, death toll has reached 50 in this Muslim Kurds vs. Muslim Turks war. This excludes the PKK casualties in Turkey and in northern Iraq due to Turkish military retaliation since they are seldom accurately reported.
Let’s speak of facts.
Sudan is not in the conventional Middle East, so let’s ignore the genocide there. Let’s ignore, also, the West Pakistani massacres in East Pakistan (Bangladesh) totaling 1.25 million in 1971. Or 200,000 deaths in Algeria in war between Islamists and the government in 1991-2006.
But a simple, strictly Middle East research will give you one million deaths in the all-Muslim Iran-Iraq war; 300,000 Muslim minorities killed by Saddam Hussein; 80,000 Iranians killed during the Islamic revolution; 25,000 deaths in 1970-71, the days of Black September, by the Jordanian government in its fight against the Palestinians; and 20,000 Islamists killed in 1982 by the elder al-Assad in Hama. The World Health Organization’s estimate of Osama bin Laden’s carnage in Iraq was already 150,000 a few years earlier.
In a 2007 research, Gunnar Heinsohn from the University of Bremen and Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, found out that some 11 million Muslims have been violently killed since 1948, of which 35,000, (0.3 percent) died during the six years of Arab war against Israel, or one out of every 315 fatalities. In contrast, over 90 percent who perished were killed by fellow Muslims.

It bears repeating that the Arab nations went to war with Israel with the expectation of annihilating the Jewish state once and for all. But the Arab states kept losing the wars.

According to Mssrs. Heinsohn and Pipes, the grisly inventory finds the total number of deaths in conflicts all over the world since 1950 numbering around 85 million. Of that, the Muslim Arab deaths in the Arab-Israeli conflict were at 46,000 including 11,000 during Israel’s war of independence. That makes 0.05 percent of all deaths in all conflicts, or 0.4 percent of all Arab deaths in the Arab-Israeli conflict.
In another calculation ignoring “small” massacres like the one that goes on in Syria and other deaths during the Arab Spring, only Saddam’s Iraq, Jordan, the elder al-Assad’s Syria, Iran-Iraq war, the bin Laden campaign in Iraq, the Iranian Islamic revolution and the Turkish-Kurdish conflict caused 1.65 million Muslim deaths by Muslims compared to less than 50,000 deaths in the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1950, including fatalities during and after Operation Cast Lead which came after the Heinsohn-Pipes study. For those who don’t have a calculator ready at their desks, allow me to tell: 50,000 is three percent of 1.65 million.
Golda Meir, the fourth prime minister of Israel, or rather the “Mother of Israel,” had a perfectly realistic point when she said that peace in the Middle East would only be possible “when Arabs love their children more than they hate us.”
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Or, as we posted in March when Britain and the U.S. took on this outsourced jihad: "Curse the infidels -- er, uh, wait: help us out, infidels! Better yet, how about you do it!"

George Jonas has done a great service in introducing the concept of the janissary to a mainstream media readership, in "Worse than Gaddafi?" From the National Post, August 24 (thanks to Arthur):

Even allowing for the uneasy relationship between reporting and reality from both sides in Libya's civil war, Muammar Gaddafi's regime seems on its last legs. Feeling jubilant over the downfall of Libya's tyrant wouldn't be a hard task as a rule. A particularly loathsome specimen even by Middle East standards, Gaddafi's departure would have felt like a net gain for humanity as well as for his own country in 1969, when he seized power; in the 1970s, when he was murdering his rivals and opponents; in the 1980s, when he was sponsoring and facilitating terrorism all over the world; and in the 1990s and 2000s, when he was merely assassinating dissidents while pretending to turn over a new leaf.
But, except for token shows of force, no one took him on. He was virtually rehabilitated, even fussed over at the 2009 G8 summit by the very NATO leaders who spent the last few months trying to dethrone and preferably pulverize him.
It may happen now - it probably will - but it may not do any good. The "Arab Spring," a phenomenon that has aroused the enthusiasm of many, has aroused mainly apprehension in me.
On February 23, I wrote that "to optimistic observers, especially to eastern seaboard liberal-democratic types, the ouster of Tunisian tyrant Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali in January amounted to lighting a long fuse to blow up all tyrannies in the Middle East. Pessimistic observers agree that the fuse has been lit, except the ensuing explosions aren't going to herald something better, such as democracy, but worse, such as theocracy."
My concern only increased when I saw much of the Western media not being able to tell the difference between a popular uprising and Egypt's military ridding itself of Hosni Mubarak. I wrote that the question to ask wasn't "Will the protesters win?" but "Will the protesters win if they do?" The answer seemed to me very much in doubt in Egypt, and increasingly so as the Arab Spring wore on. A month later, on March 30, I wrote that for the Obama administration "going into Libya, win or lose, may dwarf all foreign policy errors of the Bush administration combined."
Talking not just about Libya but the region as a whole, I suggested that "toppling a number of repressive, corrupt, inefficient and bellicose dictators friendly to the West and replacing them with equally repressive, corrupt, inefficient and bellicose dictators hostile to the West is the most likely outcome of the events that began in Tunisia in 2011. For historical models, think of the Ayatollah Khomeini replacing the Shah of Iran."
Beginning in the 14th century, the Ottoman Sultans had a force of captive Christians, called Janissaries. In our times, incongruously, it was a role NATO was beginning to assume. History's greatest military alliance assembled to defend democratic Christendom's frontiers, ended up as (unpaid) mercenaries protecting Islam's. Having acted for Muslim insurgents against Serbia in Kosovo in 1999, NATO's Janissaries were now acting for Muslim rebels they knew next to nothing about in Libya.

See also: the devshirme, the "tax" of forced abduction of Christian children from which janissaries were raised.

I wrote that if we were lending our top guns to people, it might be salutary to have a street address for them - and NATO didn't for Libya's rebels. Who were they? As I wrote five months ago, "many of the Arab Spring's stalwarts we're invited to cheer, far from being friendly to liberal democracy, seem implacably and permanently hostile to it."
Commentators sanguine about the possibility of something good emerging from all the sound and fury included several I respected, such as Fouad Ajami. While admiring their optimism, I remained a pessimist. It seemed to me it wasn't democrats spearheading the opposition to ruling Arab strongmen in the region but military or tribal competitors - at best. At worst, they were jihadists. Replacing killer colonels and ophthalmologists with Taliban-types in the Arab world seemed no cause for celebration to me.
I agree with the Middle East Forum's Daniel Pipes. The noted American commentator wrote a couple of days ago that he wasn't joining those ready to party over the political demise of the foul Libyan Colonel just yet.
"The NATO intervention in March 2011," Pipes wrote, "was done without due diligence as to who it is in Benghazi that it was helping. To this day, their identity is a mystery. Chances are good that Islamist forces are hiding behind more benign elements, waiting for the right moment to pounce, as roughly happened in Iran in 1978-79, when Islamists did not make clear their strength nor their program until the shah was well disposed of. Should that be the case in Libya today, then the miserable Gaddafi will prove to be better than his successors for both the Libyan subjects of tyranny and the West."
Indeed. For the West to welcome the replacement of a friendly despot with an unfriendly democrat may show altruism, but welcoming the replacement of a friendly despot with an unfriendly despot shows only naiveté. As for pursuing replacement policies without finding out who is about to replace whom - well, there's a word for that, too. It's called negligence.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

HonorKillingMemorial.jpg


Join us at American Independence Park near Jerusalem today for the dedication of the Aqsa Parvez Memorial Grove. Pamela Geller has the details here. One key point she makes there is this: "the point of the memorials does not end simply with the memorials themselves. The memorials show that we have not forgotten and will not forget these girls. And the memorials are just a part of a larger determination to show the Islamic world that we simply will not allow this barbaric practice of Islamic honor killing to stand in the West."

More details in her article, "Stand Against Honor Killing," in Big Government, May 31:

On August 24th, we will be dedicating the Aqsa Parvez Grove in American Independence Park in Jerusalem, Israel. If you can be in that part of the world, join me.

Non-Muslims have begun to take note of the victims of Islamic honor killing, and to serve notice to their killers that the victims will not be forgotten, or their murders ignored. Americans have seen a spike in the brutal murder of Muslim girls under Islamic law.

Remember Aqsa Parvez? She was brutally murdered by her father and brother in December 2007 for refusing to wear the Islamic headscarf. But that was only the beginning: the abuse and dehuminaization of this girl continued. She was buried in an unmarked grave. Her family refused to acknowledge her life, as she had “dishonored” them. In defiance of her devout father and brother, she had refused to live under the suffocating dictates of Islamic law. The eleventh grade student began taking off her hijab, a traditional Islamic headscarf, when she went to school, and would put it back on when she returned home. Her dad would go to her school during school hours and walk around trying to find her, trying to catch her not wearing Islamic garb, talking to boys or hanging out with “non-Muslims”. “She wanted to dress like us,” said one friend of Aqsa. “To be normal.” For this, her family prefers that she be forgotten — unknown, unloved, unmourned.

In December 2008, when I read that Aqsa lay in an unmarked grave, I was beside myself. I started a memorial fund at Atlas to get her a headstone. But I had no idea how difficult and ugly it would be simply to honor a teenage girl in Canada who just wanted to live free — and how eagerly Western non-Muslims would aid and abet the family’s efforts to dishonor her in death as they did in life.

Readers of my weblog, AtlasShrugs.com, opened their hearts and their wallets, and contributed $5,000 for a headstone for Aqsa. Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joined the effort, and we approved a design for a headstone that read, “In loving memory of Aqsa Parvez, Apr. 22, 1991-Dec. 10, 2007 — Beloved, remembered and free.” All was going according to plan until, after much silence, Meadowvale Cemetery in Brampton, Ontario, where Aqsa is buried, advised me that the family (yes, the family that murdered her) had refused to “sign off” on the headstone. The director of the cemetery said: “The family wants changes and is planning on coming in to see me. They did not book an appointment yet but I hope to see them soon.”

Of course, the family never came, and when we inquired as to purchasing a plot near Aqsa’s body, we could not. Not a tree. Not a rock. Not a bench. All the plots were owned by the Islamic Society of North America. I tried to contact the family at that time, but they would not take my calls — I spoke to the them once, but they pretended not to speak English. And they were adamant: the family refused to allow the headstone to be put on Aqsa’s grave, and according to the cemetery, could remove it if it were placed there by others.

But those of us who had contributed to the Aqsa Memorial Fund were determined to make sure that Aqsa would be memorialized. We checked into other locations, made plans, only to see them canceled at the last minute out of … fear. We checked into the arboretum at the University of Guelph in Ontario, but a university official wrote me to say that “no matter how worthy, a memorial to Aqsa Parvez would draw much public attention and would thus be inconsistent with current use of The Arboretum.”

But not everyone was ready to cower before Islamic anti-woman violence.

Considering the fact that Islamic honor killings were a global problem (over 90% of honor killings worldwide are Islamic), I approached the JNF and worked to plant the Aqsa Parvez Grove in American Independence Park in Jerusalem, Israel, where the plaque before the grove will read: “In Loving Memory of Aqsa Parvez and All Victims of Honor Killings Worldwide.” I loved the idea of a grove of trees that would continue to live and grow for decades in their name.

The memorial in Jerusalem is recognition of this horror and the first indication that in the Free World we are not going to stand by silently while the Islamic world brutalizes women and treats them as property and worthless trash. It is but a small, respectful step toward widespread resistance against honor killing in the West and elsewhere.

Read it all.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Further evidence that "the Egyptians have completely lost the Sinai." "'US intel investigating al-Qaida link to Eilat attacks'," from the Jerusalem Post, August 23:

US intelligence agencies were investigating reports that terrorist groups connected to al-Qaida played a major role in carrying out last week's multi-staged terror attacks near Eilat which killed eight Israelis and wounded dozens more, the Washington Times reported on Monday.
According to the report, a US government assessment of the attacks came to the conclusion that the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) or the Gaza-based Army of Islam (Jaish al Islam), a Palestinian group sympathetic to al-Qaida, carried out the attacks which emanated from Egypt's Sinai peninsula.
Israeli officials have blamed the PRC for the attacks and killed several of the Gaza-based Palestinian terror organization's members in IAF air strikes, including the group's secretary-general , Kamal al-Nayrab.
The PRC, who played a key role in the abduction of IDF soldier Gilad Schalit in June 2006, has denied all connection to the attacks.
According to the Washington Times report, an initial US intelligence assessment of the attacks identified a new group who may have been connected to the incident, al-Qaida in the Sinai Peninsula.
Egyptian security officials have acknowledged that new groups affiliated with al-Qaida have begun to gain a foothold in the Sinai desert. Egypt launched "Operation Eagle" earlier this month in hopes of eradicating the groups which have repeatedly blown up the natural gas pipeline in Sinai which delivers gas to both Jordan and Israel.
In the aftermath of the attacks, Defense Minister Ehud Barak complained that Egypt had lost control of the Sinai peninsula and terrorist organizations were operating there undeterred.
A US intelligence official stated that while the PRC may have been involved in the attacks, they were not the organizers of the operation.
"PRC was clearly involved, [but] they were not the brains or the brawn of the operation. They were the scouts,” the official said. “Because the PRC squawked after the operation, they became an immediate target. It is not an unjustifiable reaction.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Escalation, in an update on this story. It's gotten so bad that Yemen is now "restive," a reliable term in news reports for jihad-afflicted areas.

Arabia Felix is now Arabia Restive. "Qaeda suspects kill seven Yemen soldiers: officer," from Agence France-Presse, August 23:

Seven soldiers were killed on Tuesday and 30 others wounded in an attack launched by suspected Al-Qaeda militants on a base in the restive southern province of Abyan, a senior officer told AFP.
"Six soldiers and an officer were killed and 30 others wounded when Al-Qaeda militants attacked the camp of the 201 Brigade in Dofes," south of Abyan, capital of Zinjibar, the officer said.
The attackers had used the cover of a wooded area around the base to approach a unit of the brigade and opened fire with rocket-launchers and automatic weapons.
An official from a military hospital that took in the casualties confirmed the toll.
On Monday, government warplanes killed six presumed Al-Qaeda fighters in Arkub, another village in Abyan province, that they had seized a day earlier.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 23, 2011

Uh, not exactly. From "Malaysia safe from extreme terrorist acts, says report", The Star, 23 Aug 2011:

PETALING JAYA: Malaysia has not suffered any serious incident of terrorism in recent years, thanks to effective law enforcement efforts and close counter-terrorism cooperation with the United States and the international community, a global report on terrorism says.

Is this sort of cooperation also forthcoming from cozy Malaysian allies Saudi Arabia and Iran?

“The Royal Malaysian Police cooperated closely with the international community on counter-terrorism efforts and its officers received training in a range of counter-terrorism skills,” the report released by the US State Department said.

The report stated that the police special task force on operations and counter-terrorism had detained 15 suspected terrorists under the Internal Security Act (ISA) last year.

However, the Country Reports on Terrorism 2010 stated that Malaysia had been used as a transit and planning site for terrorists and remained vulnerable to potential terrorist activities as a result of weak border controls and gaps in maritime security.

With a foreign policy that seems downright friendly towards Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and other various thugs for Allah, it's no wonder there are such 'weak controls' as well as 'gaps in security'. And speaking of planning sites, it's pertinent to point out that a certain attack on New York and Washington almost exactly ten years ago was planned in Malaysia's capital of Kuala Lumpur.

Now, what kind of terrorists are we talking about here?

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Human Events this morning I discuss the latest Islamic supremacist attempt to demonize and marginalize those who are fighting for freedom:

On Friday, a young Muslim man in New Jersey named Kashif Pervaiz was charged with the murder of his wife, Nazish Noorani, who was shot dead Tuesday night while pushing her 3-year-old son in a stroller on a street in Boonton, N.J. Although the case apparently has nothing whatsoever to do with jihad terrorism, Islamic honor killing, or any such matter, it has been illuminating of the Islamic supremacist strategy to suppress free speech about Islam and jihad in the U.S. today.

Pervaiz, you see, was walking with Noorani when the shooting took place. He had allegedly set up the whole thing with his accomplice mistress, a Boston woman with whom he apparently shares an apartment. And according to the New York Post, Pervaiz initially told police that “three men, one black, one white and one of an uncertain race, called the couple terrorists before opening fire.” That was enough for police to investigate the possibility that the shooting was an anti-Muslim hate crime—that is, until Pervaiz began changing his story, and began to emerge as a suspect.

Islamic supremacists never miss a chance to position Muslims as victims so as to deflect attention away from jihad terror and try to place Islam and the Muslim community beyond reasonable scrutiny. And so even as Pervaiz was starting to equivocate and spin ever-taller tales, the blame game began. I received a tweet from a certain Jawad Rasul, containing a link to one of the initial stories about the murder: “If you have any humanity, you might ponder over this!” Meanwhile, a well-placed source told me that Ibrahim Hooper of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was “salivating and waiting to jump all over” the Noorani murder story. “They are waiting to blame you for everything.”

I wasn’t anywhere near Boonton last Tuesday, so why would CAIR want to blame me for this murder? Because in CAIR’s world, my work exposing the activities of Islamic jihadists and the ways in which they use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and their supremacist beliefs constitutes “hate” and “incitement to violence.” The network thinks they've found confirmation of this in the murder spree of Norwegian psychopath Anders Breivik, because he cited me (along with John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Charles Darwin, Barack Obama, the New York Times and a host of others) in his lengthy and ideologically incoherent “manifesto.”...

There is more.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dave Stein at CounterContempt purports to refute the information Pamela Geller has provided about Rick Perry's questionable associations. It would be reassuring if he had actually proven Perry to be clear of suspicion in these areas, but unfortunately that is not the case.

1. The curriculum.

Stein contends that the Atlas Shrugs reader who provided information about the Texas curriculum about Islam that the Aga Khan Foundation developed "was quoting from the abstracts (summaries) of the sessions that the teachers who volunteer for the Muslim Histories and Culture Project (MHCP) attend," and not from the curriculum itself. He assures us that a "a 60-something-year-old world history teacher with a Master’s Degree" can "read books from various points of view and reach his own conclusions," and that "the training involved no pro-Islam proselytizing."

It is odd that the teacher sessions would involve whitewashing of Islamic teaching and of its historical record, but that the curriculum itself would not, and Stein doesn't explain how that happened. Nor does he explain why we should trust his 60-something-year-old world history teacher. And even if his world history teacher is extremely knowledgeable about Islam, the material presented at Atlas Shrugs did not involve proselytizing, which he assures us is not happening, but whitewashing, which he does not address. And while I would love to take his word for it, arguments from authority are the weakest of all arguments, and he ultimately presents nothing to assure anyone that the questionable material in the teacher sessions is not making its way into the classroom. After all, what are the teacher sessions for, if not to train the teachers on how to present the material in the classroom?

He also says that there was nothing in the seminar abstracts "that even remotely qualifies as pro-Sharia." Yet the material we do see presents Muhammad as a benign moral teacher, saying nothing about his teachings of hatred, warfare and subjugation, and also whitewashes the oppressive history of Muslim Spain, and other matters. To dismiss concern about this by saying it's not "pro-Sharia" is too narrow. The heavily slanted and wholly positive view of Islam that Islamic supremacist groups have insinuated into textbooks and curricula fosters ignorance of the nature of the jihad threat and complacency about it, and provides a basis for proselytization from other materials. Ignore or minimize this at your own risk.

2. The Aga Khan and the Ismailis.

Stein says that "if Robert Spencer – whose entire raison d’être is investigating and tracking Islamists – didn’t know about these 'new facts' until last week, well…certainly Rick Perry can be excused for not knowing them as well." No, he can't. I am not entering into partnership with the Aga Khan. If I were, I would certainly vet him thoroughly first, and Perry should have. As far as not knowing about these issues, I wish I could keep up with all the violent and stealthy jihad activity going on in the world, but there is just too much of it, and the purchase of a tainted bank and investment in a tainted regime by the Aga Khan is simply not something that is going to become an issue until someone like Rick Perry becomes a viable presidential candidate, and everyone starts rushing to declare him the perfect candidate without properly vetting him. Perry should have vetted the Aga Khan, and we must vet Rick Perry.

3. The Habib Bank.

Stein points out that "the Aga Khan Foundation was not part-owner of Habib Bank until two years after the murder of Daniel Pearl," and dismisses all concern about it accordingly, even though the bank is in Pakistan, a country Stein himself terms "about as loyal and trustworthy an ally as a pet scorpion." Does Stein have information to the effect that the Aga Khan dismissed everyone who had been with the bank before he bought it, and thoroughly cleansed it of all al-Qaeda ties? Would such a thing even be possible to do in Pakistan?

4. The Aga Khan's investments in Syria.

Regarding the Aga Khan's investments in Syria, Stein contends that "'General Moustapha Sharba' accusation is found only on the 'everything but the kitchen sink' conspiracy-theory site of Mark Mitchell." Actually there is a picture of Sharba with Ismaili leaders on an Ismaili website. Why doesn't Stein mention that?

Then he dismisses the Aga Khan investments in Syria by pointing out that the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) did humanitarian work in countries ruled by tyrannical regimes, and challenges Pamela Geller to show that the Aga Khan money went to terrorist activity. However, the fact that one group does a foolish thing doesn't excuse someone else for doing the same foolish thing. In any case, the JDC was not endorsing the Ceaucescu regime by giving that aid; however, the Aga Khan worked directly with the Assad regime. Aiding oppressed people in spite of their regime is not the same thing as working with that regime, thereby freeing it up to spend its own funds on terrorist or other nefarious activity. Syria is a state sponsor of terrorism. If that means anything at all, no one should be investing there.

5. Norquist.

Stein points out that Norquist is ubiquitous and powerful. Granted. But Perry and Norquist are very close. Perry has raised funds for Norquist. They have vacationed together. Until I see Bachmann, West, and the others Stein mentioned doing the same thing, I will continue to raise questions about Perry's closeness to Norquist.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Surely we'll hear this has been "taken out of context." "Islamic scholar: Every Muslim has right to kill Zionists," by Roee Nahmias for YNet News, August 23 (thanks to Twostellas):

Islamic scholar Dr. Salah Sultan issued a religious decree according to which it is permissible to kill "any Israeli on Egyptian land, in response to the killing of Egyptian soldiers near the border with Israel," Egyptian Al-Shuruq newspaper reported on Tuesday.
Sultan is a lecturer of Muslim jurisprudence at the Cairo University. In the decree, he ruled that "every Muslim who meets a Zionist is entitled to kill him, after Israel killed 'Camp David'. The Egyptian people do not distinguish between Egyptian and Palestinian blood," he ruled.
| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They want a "substate" arrangement that would require changing the country's constitution. It would be a win-win situation for the jihadists: all of the benefits of sovereignty, without the full responsibility of acting like a real state. And they would be in a position to continue to move the goalposts on conditions for peace with the central government, changing demands for resources, for borders on the territory, and of course, insisting on the right to impose all the Sharia they please. Again, blackmailing Manila is cheaper than war.

In the current proposal, MILF would also have to disarm. A disarmed jihadist movement would be a contradiction in terms. An update on this story. "Muslim rebels reject Philippine peace proposal," by Oliver Teves for the Associated Press, August 23 (thanks to Twostellas):

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines' largest Muslim rebel group rejected a government proposal for autonomy in the country's south as inadequate but said Tuesday they will continue talks.
Representatives from the Moro Islamic Liberation Front insisted on a substate for minority Muslims, chief government negotiator Marvic Leonen told reporters in a video conference from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where the talks were held.
The government position omitted the word "substate" because that would require a change in the Philippine Constitution, Leonen said.
He said the government proposal contained autonomy but the rebels believed it did not go far enough.
Rebel vice chairman Ghadzali Jaafar told ABS-CBN television that the government proposal "does not address the real issues."

It's about dominance, and Sharia.

"We want to first address the political issue," he said. "This is a political problem, not an economic problem. We are not talking here about economic reforms, which are nothing if they are not given a political solution."
The rebels earlier gave up their demand for a separate state and said they are willing to work with the government on protecting Muslims' rights in the predominantly Roman Catholic nation.
Leonen said the government's 20-page peace proposal included "three components for one single solution."
"It seeks to not only provide just and lasting peace to the troubled south but more so to improve and uplift the lives of the people who have long suffered from the brutality of decades-long armed conflict," he said, adding it was "principled, realistic, and practical proposal."
He said the three components include massive social services and economic development to break the "cycle of poverty" in areas already under an existing autonomous Muslim region.

Speaking of contradictions, it should seem just a bit hypocritical to demand political autonomy from the very entity from which one is requiring "massive social services": leave us alone, and pay us. And for that matter, autonomy didn't solve the problems the last time, but, let's try it again. And throw more money at it, please.

It also included a political settlement under a peace accord with the Moro rebel group that would create a commission to push Congress to pass a legislation to strengthen the Muslim region, and an acknowledgment of Muslim contributions to the Filipinos' historical struggles to facilitate the "healing of the wounds created by war."
He said he could not yet disclose the details of the government proposal. However, any proposal would require "the consent of the governed and is within the bounds of our national sovereignty, territorial integrity and the Philippine Constitution," he said....
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And the soldiers who protect them, in a simultaneous strike against the law enforcement of a non-Islamic government, financial support for the monks, and a what is seen as a competing faith being visibly practiced in what the jihadists consider their territory.

The fact that Buddhist monks have to be protected by soldiers speaks volumes about the situation in southern Thailand. After all, nothing says "tolerance" like beating up on monks. Or are we to trust the "tolerance" will come after the jihadists get everything they want? "Suspected insurgents kill 2 in Thailand's south," from the Associated Press, August 23 (thanks to Twostellas):

PATTANI (AP) - Police say suspected Islamist insurgents have killed two soldiers and wounded 14 other people in two separate attacks in Thailand's violence-plagued south.
Police Col Somporn Meesuk says a roadside bomb in Pattani province killed one military officer and injured eight other officers, two Buddhist monks and three civilians.
Col Somporn says the bomb exploded as the officers were accompanying the monks on almsgiving rounds at dawn on Tuesday.
Police Col Kritsada Kaewjandee says another soldier died and one was injured in Yala province on Tuesday when a roadside bomb detonated as they walked past.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Goodness knows he'd love to use radiation against what he calls a "tumor." "Iranian President Calls for Muslims' Massive Turnout on Quds Day," from Fars News Agency, August 22:

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad urged the worldwide Muslim community as well as non-Muslim countries to stage massive participation in the International Quds Day rallies on Friday.
President Ahmadinejad said on Sunday that nations can get rid of "the infected tumor of the Zionist regime" through mobilizing their beliefs and ideals.
The Iranian chief executive described the city of al-Quds in the occupied Palestinian land as "the key point in resolving historical issues."
Ahmadinejad also noted that Iranians are a pioneer nation in defending oppressed people across the world against "misconducts of arrogant powers and global Zionism."

Don't make us mobilize our spy squirrels.

He expressed hope this year's Quds Day rallies lead to "the elimination of the Zionist regime and freedom of mankind from evils."
Millions of people are expected to take part in the International Quds Day (Friday, August 26) rallies in solidarity with the oppressed Palestinian people and all oppressed nations around the world.
The founder of the Islamic Revolution Imam Khomeini designated the last Friday of the fasting month of Ramadan as "Quds Day" in a show of support for the world's Muslims, in particular the Palestinians.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

If they want to go off the rails, it will cost them, as it certainly should. More on this story. "US: Aid to Egypt conditional on peace with Israel," by Herb Keinon for the Jerusalem Post, August 23:

Washington’s $2 billion in annual aid to Egypt will be cut off if Cairo backs out of the peace treaty with Israel, Congresswoman Kay Granger – whose job as chairwoman of the US House appropriations foreign operations subcommittee means she literally writes America’s annual foreign aid bill – told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.
“The United States aid to Egypt is predicated on the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, and so the relationship between Egypt and Israel is extremely important,” the eight-term Republican from Texas said in an interview.
“As an appropriator I have two concerns: One thing is the continuing relationship between Egypt and Israel, and the other thing of course is what government we will be dealing with in Egypt, and what position the Muslim Brotherhood will play in this government.”
Granger, here among a delegation of 25 Republican congressmen sponsored by the American Israel Educational Foundation, a charitable organization affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, said she is on record as saying that “if the treaty between Egypt and Israel is not continued, our financial support will not continue.”
She said she was not aware of any US threat to cut aid to Egypt during discussions this week on defusing the Israeli-Egyptian crisis following Thursday’s terrorist attack and the ensuing killing of three Egyptian security officials. A senior Israeli official said that not only was there no threat of a cutoff of aid, but that there was no need for such a threat, and Israel never asked for one.
While Egypt and Israel were in direct contact in defusing the crisis, the US was also heavily involved in the discussions as well.
Regarding how the Muslim Brotherhood’s participation in a future Egyptian government would impact the level of aid, Granger said this would depend “on how much of a position they have.”
Everyone, she said, assumed the Muslim Brotherhood would have some role and some participation in the next Egyptian government, but what will impact the level of US assistance will be the level of its governmental control.
She said all of this has been made clear to the Egyptians, and that at a meeting in March with transition head Field Marshal Muhammad Hussein Tantawi, the first thing she asked was whether the treaty with Israel would be honored.
“The answer was yes,” she said. [...]
Since the 1979 peace treaty with Egypt, the US has provided Cairo with $2b. of aid annually, $1.3b. in military assistance and the rest in economic assistance.
Granger, who along with the delegation is scheduled to meet Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday, said it has been made clear that if the PA goes through with its statehood recognition bid at the UN in September, the roughly $500m. of US aid to the PA would be suspended. She said this would include money for Palestinian security training....
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The U.S. and NATO have already been trying to secure Gadhafi's arsenal, which includes mustard gas, through the Libyan rebels. The fall of Gadhafi's and Assad's regimes could both make for one hellish garage sale for jihadist bargain-hunters. "Mideast Expert: Syria's WMD Could Fall to Islamists," by Brett Sandala for NewsMax, August 22:

Israel is "very concerned" over the potential fall of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, according to Yaakov Katz, Israeli military expert and defense correspondent for the Jerusalem Post.
"All of this extensive, advanced weaponry that Assad has manufactured and hoarded over the past decade will find itself in the hands of people who might even be more radical than Assad, and who don't have the political calculations that he had."
In an exclusive Newsmax interview, Katz also suggests a more positive scenario: "If Assad will fall, the supply line to Hezbollah will be cut off and Iran will find itself more isolated without the friend it used to have in Syria. That could be a very good outcome for Israel. At the same time though, Israel is very concerned [that] no one in the world can say who will be the potential successor in Syria.
"[Assad] has an extensive chemical weapons program, and thousands of SCUD missiles . . . that could do a lot of damage against Israel," Katz says, reasoning that western powers were able to militarily intervene in Libya because, "There was basically no place for Libya to respond to. On the other hand, If the United States or NATO starts to bomb Syria, Assad could fire SCUD missiles into Israel.
"It's an extremely dangerous time, mostly characterized by uncertainty . . . a level of which hasn't been seen for years. Israel could find itself as not only the only democracy in the Middle East, but the only country that's not run by radical Islamists.
"Since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel hasn't faced enemies on its northern and southern fronts," says Katz, regarding the tense situation on Israel's border with Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, where a Palestinian terror attack last week killed eight Israelis and ignited a round of fighting between Israel and Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
"Sinai has turned into a lawless Wild West of sorts. The Egyptians have completely lost the Sinai and are now trying to restore law and order, and Israel is allowing Egypt to deploy forces inside of the Sinai."
Per the peace treaty signed between Israel and Egypt in 1979, the peninsula was to remain demilitarized. "Israel is bending the peace treaty to allow them to insert those troops," Katz explains.
After striking targets in Gaza through the weekend, Israel agreed to a ceasefire on Monday for two reasons, according to Katz: "What happens in Gaza affects Israel's ties with Egypt. An Israeli onslaught against Gaza today is something the Egyptians refuse to accept."
Also, "Israel restrained itself to some extent because of the potential diplomatic and international fallout it would face ahead of September," when the Palestinians plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly to grant statehood to Palestine.
"Gaza today is linked to what's happening in Egypt, and that's due to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood is a growing force in Egypt, particularly on the political level . . . [and] is the founding fathers of Hamas."
The Muslim Brotherhood aren't the only players behind the scenes, according to Katz: "It's all under the umbrella of the Islamic regime of Iran."
"The weaponry comes from Iran, some are produced in Gaza with Iranian tech and knowhow. The model of the most recent attack [against Israel] was very similar to some IDF officers who are familiar with fighting in Lebanon against Hezbollah . . . It's almost like they come off the assembly line straight out of Iran."
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadists know the double standard that is in place means that while Israel will observe the "lull," the world will indulge Hamas and its fellow travelers a few slip-ups -- in other words, a few free shots. And here they are.

"Lull breached; rockets hit westeren [sic] Negev," by Shmulik Hadad for YNet News, August 23:

The fragile armistice declared by the Gaza terror groups was breached once more Monday evening, as several rockets were were fired from northern Gaza at Israel's southern communities.
Four Qassam rockets were fired from northern Gaza at the area: One landed south of Ashkelon causing no harm; and three others exploded in open areas at the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council.
The Color Red alert sounded across the western Negev just seconds before the projectiles landed.
| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Spanish ambassador said the statements by the foreign minister, Trinidad Jimenez, were "taken out of context." Jimenez had said that "there's the feeling that now is the time to do something, to give the Palestinians the hope that a state could become reality ... We have to give them some signal, because if we don't it could generate great frustration for the Palestinian people."

Again, "hope" does not make a governable state, and policy-making geared toward speculation on people's emotions is presumptuous and ultimately a gamble, hoping for hope.

The new Spanish stance is that the country's support depends on the nature of the Palestinian request. They are still unwilling, unlike their former prime minister, to say "no" outright. "Jerusalem rebukes Spanish envoy over PA statement," by Ronen Medzini for YNet News, August 22:

The Foreign Ministry summoned Spain's ambassador to Israel on Monday, following a statement by Spanish Foreign Minister Trinidad Jimenez suggesting that Madrid will support the Palestinian Authority UN bid for statehood in September.
Naor Gilon, head of the Foreign Ministry's European Division, expressed disappointment in Jimenez's statement, saying Madrid's stance was surprising "especially given the excellent bilateral relations between the two nations."
Spanish Ambassador Alvaro Iranzo explained that Foreign Minister Jimenez' statements were taken somewhat out of context, adding that Spain's position on the matter was contingent on both the EU's stance and the phrasing of the Palestinians' request.
Iranzo stressed that Madrid would not be able to support the PA's bid unless it was "phrased in a balanced way and addresses the need the resume negotiations between the parties, and maintain Israel's security. Without these parameters, Spain will not be able to support the request."...

There is also the matter of the PA's reconciliation with Hamas, which makes no secret of its intentions to destroy Israel. The PA cannot commit to "maintain Israel's security" and commit to share governance with Hamas.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 22, 2011

Maybe the secular, democratic, pro-Western forces among the Libyan rebels will keep anything like this draft Constitution from being implemented. How likely do you think that is? It seems extraordinarily unlikely to me, and yet it is taken for granted by all those who wield power in the U.S. and Europe. Well, we'll see now.

"Libyan Draft Constitution: Sharia is ‘Principal Source of Legislation,’" by Lachlan Markay for The Foundry, August 22:

The dust has not yet settled over the Libyan capital of Tripoli since rebels took control over the weekend. But already, a draft constitutional charter for the transitional state has appeared online (embedded below). It is just a draft, mind you, and gauging its authenticity at this point is difficult. There is also no way to know whether this draft or something similar will emerge as the final governing document for a new Libyan regime.

As both the Morning Bell and Washington in a Flash noted today, Heritage Fellow Jim Phillips recently pointed out that Islamist forces “appear to make up a small but not insignificant part of the opposition coalition,” and must be prevented “from hijacking Libya’s future.” Parts of the draft Constitution allay those fears, while others exacerbate them.

Much of the document describes political institutions that will sound familiar to citizens of Western liberal democracies, including rule of law, freedom of speech and religious practice, and a multi-party electoral system.

But despite the Lockean tenor of much of the constitution, the inescapable clause lies right in Part 1, Article 1: “Islam is the Religion of the State, and the principal source of legislation is Islamic Jurisprudence (Sharia).” Under this constitution, in other words, Islam is law. That makes other phrases such as “there shall be no crime or penalty except by virtue of the law” and “Judges shall be independent, subject to no other authority but law and conscience” a bit more ominous.

A bit.

| 43 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Recently I debated the Imam Moustafa Zayed for the second time. This time the topic was, "Does Islam Guarantee Women Equality of Rights with Men?" After this one, even poor Zayed's fellow Islamic supremacists threw him under the bus -- and usually they claim victory no matter how badly they were bested. So grab some popcorn and watch the fun.

David Wood of Answering Muslims just kindly sent me this transcript of the debate from the Betwixt blog. David says he cannot vouch for its complete accuracy, so if you spot any errors, please let me know and I will fix them here as well as pass them on to the source, to whom I am most grateful for doing this.

MODERATOR: The issue of whether women have rights and equality in Islam is a matter being debated around the country today. Some scholars say that women do have equality of rights while other scholars say the contrary. Which should we accept?

Thank for joining us this evening on Debate Night on ABN Live. I'm Chris Conway, your moderator of the evening.

We have two experts debating this motion: Islam Guarantees Women Equality of Rights with Men. I'm honored to introduce Mustafa Zayed who argue on the affirmative of the motion. Mustafa Zayed is a member of the Scientific Board of Qur'an and Sunnah Research in Cairo. He speaks widely in interfaith settings with devotion to bridging peace between major religions and in communities. Zayed is the author of several books, including The Lies About Muhammad.

I'm also honored to introduce Robert Spencer, who argue on the negative of the motion. Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch, an organization dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology play in the modern world and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad in religion in modern-day context. He is the author of ten books, including the New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades.

We'll hear from each of the debaters an opening statement, rebuttals, crossfire, and a closing statement.I'll notify each debater when there are only 30 seconds left on the clock. We will then conclude the formal part of the debate and open the phone lines for you, the audience, to call in. The number here at the studio is 248.416.1300. Again, the motion of tonight's debate is, Islam Guarantees Women Equality of Rights with Men.

At this time, I'd like to turn over to you, Mustafa, for your opening statement. You have seven minutes.

MUSTAFA ZAYED: OPENING STATEMENT (7 minutes)
Thank you for having me.

Before we speak about the specificity of the topic of women rights in Islam, in generality, dealing with any human being in Islam is included in Islamic Law or Shari'a Law. Shari'a Law is not a law that is made by the limited comprehension of men at a certain period of time in a certain geographical area and then trying to impose that upon all humans worldwide in any time. This is the law of God, and God is just and He forbid injustice upon himself in any topic and forbid it for his worshipers and creations. So when we say "women rights in Islam," we need to understand that it is the law of God, protecting and making sure that women and men are having the [prospective in (3:18)] equal rights.

Two things before we get into the rights of women in Islam and the position of Islam: The first thing is that in Islam, men and women are not in competition. They're not roommates competing for who pays a bigger or small portion of the bill or, you know, splitting whatever cost somewhere. They are to complement each other. They are different in physiology. They are different in emotional structure, and Islamic Law [came (3:41)] that they enjoy the best of their life according to their own structure and needing each other and depending on each other and completing each other---complementing each other. That's number one.

Number two, specifically when it comes to the rights of women, a woman, the female in Islam, is your potential mother. And it's not that females are half of, you know, humanity and they deserve rights, and so on and so forth. No, females are the mothers of the next generation who are to shape and sculpture the character of all men and women, the entire next generation to come. So Islam and Islamic Law made sure to guarantee their protection, their financial sustenance, their stability, so they can perform the best and the most decent job that a human being can do, which is again raising the next generation.

When [you (4:30)] took a position, I would say, hopefully objective position, in looking at the condition of women and the rights and obligations before Islam and after Islam, the difference couldn't be more stark. It's the difference between a day and a nightmare. Before Islam, for example, in parts of India, according to Hinduism, a woman was to be burned alive if her husband passed away. She's just there for me. He dies, there's no need for existence. A matter of fact, in other places when they got some progression, she's not even supposed to get married again. Little newborn babies were burned alive. The horrendous mistranslation in the Bible about the concept of Original Sin, that it is through our mother, Eve, our father, Adam, was deceived out of Paradise into earth. When Islam comes in, all that was rectified. And our mothers, our daughters, our sisters were relieved when Allah (Subhan'Allah) in the Qur'an said, [speaks in Arabic]. It is the devil that deceived them both out of Paradise into earth. Women had now inheritance rights that in America today, women do not have--guaranteed inheritance rights.

Women have equal pay rights. They have the right to own, to speak their mind, to debate, to run businesses. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) only wife for a quarter century, Khadija, may Allah (Subhan'Allah) be pleased with her, was a businesswoman. In England, 'til 1882, the end of the 19th century, a woman did not have any right to own a property in her own name. It has to be the brother, the husband, or the son. She could not even stand in court as a legal entity. At the end of 19th century, that right was mandated to, given to Muslim women in the 7the century. So it's not even equal to or similar to or better to. No, that was better rights in the 7th century.

Islam mandated the education of women in the middle of 7th century. In a a correct hadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari, even for a war captive that is now entrusted to a Muslim man that he, even though, she's not a Muslim, he needs to treat her well and educate her. And the authentic hadith says there, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would release a war combatant that might turn around and come and kill Muslims, if he taught Muslims how to read and write, and the similar thing for Muslim women, how to read and write.

A woman is not an object of desire anymore, is not a vessel for procreation. She is judged for her character and her mannerism. And the word, "religion", in Islam in the language of the Prophet, means character. So you can pursue a woman for marriage for her beauty, for her money, for her social status. The Prophet said, no pursue the one with the character, the only thing that she is actually in control of. She has no control if she was born beautiful or rich or from a good family, but she is in control of her character. She is not an object of desire anymore.

A woman, in Islam, is someone who is equal in so many things that you cannot begin to imagine or even available in the 19th century. She have the right of futya; she can give legal opinions, and many women had that legal opinion. The first commerce secretary that is a female in the history in all of mankind was [Ashafat --- (7:37)] who was the commerce secretary at the time of [Omar --- Al-Khatab (7:43)]. He gave her [--- (7:43)], and she used to rule in the matters of the market between men and women. The first political party that is [led] by a feminist, well I would say a feminist party, that is led by a woman was Asma bint Yazzid Al-Ansari when she came to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), she said, I represent so many women that have the same opinion that I have and saying what I'm saying and here's what we want, here's what we're asking. And Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) responded to her, The only holy scripture in the world, that when it speaks to the believers, speak to them in female and male terms, is the Qur'an, not the Bible, not any other holy scripture. Believing men, believing women, righteous men, righteous women, and so on and so forth. [Reads a verse in Arabic] Whoever do a righteous deed, male or female, we would [--- (8:30)] well and so on and so forth. The only chapter in any holy scripture, the gospels in the Bible or gospels that are outside of the Bible, that is named after a woman is in the Qur'an and which woman she might be. She's the greatest woman that ever lived and will ever live, that's Virgin Mary (PBUH). And in Islam, she is such a pious woman, that's why she was blessed to be the mother of a great, mighty prophet of God. The only chapter in all holy scriptures, that is Chapter An-Nisa (The Women), that is almost a manifesto of unprecedented women's rights now and then.

Islam is not defending the rights of women. Islam, and I represent that position, shows the rights of women that is unprecedented today. That is in Islam. Watch Robert Spencer now coming to you with extreme examples of rural areas of ten villages somewhere and try to generalize them over the entire population of 1.6 billion. Watch him bring in twisted and, you know, misinterpreted and total omissions and mistranslation of books that only God knows where he got their translations from. Watch the circus.

ROBERT SPENCER: OPENING STATEMENT (7 minutes)
Thank you.

I think that I'm not going argue this point. I'm going to let the Qur'an do it, and the Qur'an says, "Men have authority over women, because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them." Now I would ask the learned imam, Mustafa Zayed, if that's a mistranslation or taking out of context... What is the context that would justify such a statement. "Men have authority over women, because God has made the one superior to the other." The question before us is, "Islam guarantees equality of men and women." Obviously, that flatly contradicts the Qur'an, and so I assume the Imam Mustafa, as a believer in the Qur'an, believes that God has made men superior to women.

The passage goes on, "Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts, because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them, forsake them in beds apart, and beat them." And beat them. The learned Imam was very eloquent in saying that the Qur'an is the only scripture, which addresses believers as both male and female. That, of course, is flatly false, but we are not here, I would remind him, to discuss the Bible or Christianity. We are here to discuss Islam and whether Islam mandates equality of rights for women and men. And so, the fact is that the Qur'an does indeed tell believers that they should be distinguished, male and female. They should understand that as being a fundamentally important distinction and does address them as such. And it does not say that women can beat a disobedient man. It says that men can beat disobedient women.

The Qur'an also has this distinction of being the only scripture that mandates spousal abuse. The reality of the spousal abuse is such that in the Islamic world, it is relatively frequent and is taken for granted. And there is a very common hadith, which I'm sure the Imam will be able to refresh us about, in which some Muslims approached Muhammad and asked him what they should beat their wives with. And as it happens, he's brushing his teeth at the time, so he holds up his miswak, his toothbrush, and says, With this, which has been interpreted as meaning that the Muslim should only beat his wife in a symbolic way, and so as not to cause her any pain or cause her any harm. And that's a beautiful thing, I suppose relatively. A symbolic wife-beating seems to me to be perhaps less painful but still rather an odd concept. But, unfortunately, it's contradicted by other hadith.

For example, when Aisha, Muhammad's favorite wife, whom he married when she was six and consummated the marriage when she was nine and he was fifty-four, she recalls a time when Muhammad "struck me on the chest which caused me pain." That's Sahih Muslim #2127. And so it appears that he, himself, did not just use his toothbrush to beat his disobedient wife. And, of course, Muhammad, being the excellent example of conduct, that is, unfortunately, the behavior that is sanctioned, as having the example of the prophet behind it, as something that Muslims can and should, with profit, imitate. And so we see on Saudi television, from the kingdom of the two holy places, a place where it's very self-consciously dedicated to being obedient to every aspect of Islam. Actual television programs discussing the proper implements for wife-beating.

Now the problem here is not just wife-beating. The question before us again is about the equality of rights of women with men. In the Judeo-Christian, Western civilization, of course, while this has been a long battle and something that has many vicissitudes as the Imam pointed out, there is the fundamental idea that women and men are equal in dignity before God, and thus, should have equality of rights before the law. But in the Qur'an, it's very different. The Imam Mustafa pointed out that women could testify in court, but he did not bother to tell you about Qur'an's chapter 2:282, which says that "You should get two witnesses out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women such as you choose for witnesses so that if one of them forgets, the other can remind her." And on this basis, Muhammad himself, in a famous hadith told women that he had seen a vision of hell, and there were many more women in hell than men; and the reason why, he said, when the women indignantly asked him why that was, he responded that it's because women were deficient in religion and in intellect. And they asked him again, How is that? And he pointed to this verse in the Qur'an and said you're deficient in intellect, obviously, because your testimony is devalued; and deficient in religion because when menstruating, you're not allowed to pray in the mosque.

And so this was an inequality of intellect and an inequality of spirituality and inequality of rights before the law resulting from it. And so here again, the question before us is, does Islam guarantee equality of rights to women? Obviously, by the testimony of the Qur'an itself and Islamic Law and Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, it manifestly does not.

Chapter 4:11 of the Qur'an.says, "Allah direct you as regards to your children's inheritance. To the male, apportion equal to that of two females." Let me repeat that, "To the male, apportion equal to that of two females." How is that equality of rights? Now, I would remind you once again that I'm quoting from the Qur'an, and the Imam Mustafa may say that this is all out of context, but he cannot--at least if he has any interest in the truth, which, of course, not at all established--but if he does, then he cannot deny that these things are elements of Islamic Law to this day. And that in Islamic Law, as is the consensus, the ijma, of all the Madh'hab of the Sunnis, the schools of jurisprudence, it is agreed upon by them that a man should have greater inheritance rights than a woman, that a woman should not have the same value in her testimony as a man, and indeed is barred from testifying at all in cases of zena or sexual indiscretion, even if she is the victim. [Her] testimony is devalued altogether, and there is this mandate for inequality that manifests itself in many ways, which I am sure we will discuss. But the record of Islamic Law is clear, and so this is not the matter of some obscure village or out-of-context citations. This is a matter of the Qur'an itself as interpreted by mainstream Islamic authorities.

There is much more.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Presumably, then, Qaradawi and these other scholars think that the regime that follows Assad is likely to be less "heretical" and more Islamic. "Fatwa in the Gulf, Signed by Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: Syrian Regime Is 'Heretical'; Sever Ties with It," from MEMRI, August 22:

[...] "In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful,

"A fatwa by the religious scholars of Kuwait...

"Allah the Supreme said: Your guardian can be only Allah; and His messenger and those who believe' [Koran 5:55]. What has befallen our Muslim brothers in Syria compels the scholars to state the truth and deny the lies [regarding] the revolution [of the Syrian people]. This includes:

"1. It is a duty to assist the Syrian people with words and actions, since this is part of the alliance [among the] believers, and a tenet of the faith. Allah the Supreme said: 'And if they seek help of you for the religion, then you must help...' [Koran 8:72]

"2. It is a duty to condemn the murders, torture, and imprisonments carried out by the Syrian regime, and to rule that the Ba'th regime is heretical for its words and actions. Allah the Supreme said: 'But whoever kills a believer intentionally – his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him a great punishment.' [Koran 4:93]

"3. It is forbidden to collude with the Syrian regime or to support its actions. He who does [so is] aiding the oppressor, and is an oppressor himself. Allah the Supreme said: 'Do not cooperate in sin and aggression.' [Koran 5:2]

"4. Every ambassador of the Syrian regime must resign his position. He cannot continue [to be a part] of this oppressive regime.

"5. Arab countries, and the Islamic countries in particular [sic], should assist the Syrian people and meet its financial, nutritional, and medical needs. This is considered financial jihad for the sake of Allah.

"6. It is a duty to sever [all] official ties – political, financial, cultural, and in the domain of media – with the Syrian regime.

"We call on the religious scholars in Syria to disassociate themselves from the regime and speak the truth, in order to help the Syrians, who know more than anyone about the corruption of the regime. Allah the Supreme said: 'And do not conceal testimony, for whoever conceals it – his heart is indeed sinful...' [Koran 2:283]

"The fatwa has been sent to, and approved by, the head and the secretary-general of the International Union of Muslim Scholars:

"Secretary-General – Dr. 'Ali Al-Fardaqi.

"Head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars – Dr. Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi.

"The International Union of Muslim Scholars has endorsed [the fatwa] and it is currently being sent to scholars for approval.

"Signed: 'Ujail Al-Nashmi, Ahafi Al-'Ajami, 'Abd Al-Rahman 'Abd Al-Khalek, Jassem Muhalhal Al-Yasin, Hamed Al-'Ali, 'Othman Al-Khamis, 'Abd Al-Muhsan, Zain Al-Mutairi."

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I tried to tell you. "Footage of Egyptians Demonstrating opposite Israeli Embassy in Cairo Showing Sign with Swastika Saying 'The Gas Chambers Are Ready,' Al-Jazeera TV (Qatar), August 21," from MEMRITV, August 22 (thanks to Pamela Geller).

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In this letter Arash Irandoost of the target Pro-Democracy Movement of Iran says that the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) is a lobbying group for the Islamic Republic of Iran. This would be no surprise, since the deeply dishonest and arrogant Islamic supremacist pseudo-moderate Reza Aslan is a Board member of NIAC. Please contact Rep. Moran's office and politely and courteously urge him to drop his plans to speak at the NIAC conference.

"Please sign, call and urge Congressman to cancel NIAC Leadership Conference," by Arash Irandoost of the Pro-Democracy Movement of Iran (thanks to Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi):

Dear friends, please call Congressman Jim Moran and urge him to cancel the event. We have 2650 people who say that Trita is an IRI lobby. Why is the Congressman attending such a shameful event. Also, if you like to add your name to the letter below, let us know.

"All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

Your voice matters! Please contact the Honorable Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) and express your deep concern over NIAC and its President Trita Parsi and Congressman's Keynote Speech at the conference on Oct 3rd, 2011.

Capitol Hill Office
2239 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515-4608
Phone: (202) 225-4376
Fax: (202) 225-0017
District Office
333 N. Fairfax St., Suite 201
Alexandria, VA 22314 - 2632
Phone: (703) 971-4700
Fax: (703) 922-9436

____________________________

August 21, 2011

Honorable Jim Moran
Senior Member of the Appropriations Committee
2239 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515

Re: Your participation in NIAC sponsored “Leadership Conference" in October 2011

Dear Congressman Moran,


We, the undersigned, express grave concern regarding your participation as “Special Keynote Speaker” in NIAC’s upcoming Leadership Conference scheduled for Monday October 3rd, 2011.
While we appreciate your attention to issues related to Iran and the U.S. foreign policy towards Iran, The Iranian-American community considers the "self-appointed" Trita Parsi of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) an intellectually dishonest regime apologist and an unofficial and unregistered lobbyist for the Iranian regime. Trita Parsi contributes to the regime’s agenda and serves the interests of those in power in the Islamic Republic of Iran, not the Iranians, nor the Iranian-Americans. In an online and currently active survey of over 2,000 participants, 94% of the Iranian-Americans expressed that Trita is a lobbyist for the Iranian regime and 95% stated that NIAC does not represent Iranian-Americans’ interests.

For over three decades, various governments have used dialogue and diplomacy with the regime in Iran to no avail, starting with the administration of President Jimmy Carter, who did everything possible to assure the new regime of American friendship and failed miserably. Since that time, the more world governments have tried to engage the regime’s leaders, the more belligerent, emboldened and abusive they have become. President Obama in his speech stated: "We support a set of universal rights. Those rights include free speech; the freedom of peaceful assembly; freedom of religion; equality for men and women under the rule of law; and the right to choose your own leaders – whether you live in Baghdad or Damascus; Sanaa or Tehran." Well, the regime in Iran has violated all of stated of universal rights and then some. Yet, the West continues to appease this regime. It is time for the United States to support the pro-democracy movements in the region with actions and just the empty rhetoric.
The Islamic regime’s apologists such as NIAC deceptively portray the Islamic government in Iran as a pragmatic and rational entity. They suggest that dialogue and diplomacy are the best way to deal with Iran. They falsely claim that sanctions are not effective and hurt ordinary Iranian people. Recently, primarily due to opposition leaders Mousavi's and Karoubi’s arrests, these apologists are attempting to shift the focus from Iran’s weapons program to what they have decided is more acceptable and palatable human rights issues. They have blamed the regime’s blatant human rights violations, which have recently overtaken China's as the worst in the world, on U.S. pressure and ridiculously claimed that recognition of the IRI would improve the human rights violations in Iran.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a study in contrasts. The ruling theocracy is draconian and dangerous. It is a very real and imminent threat not just to our national security but also to world stability. Lobbyists such as Trita Parsi who use the pretext of easing the sanctions to help the ordinary Iranians, are deceitful, and are meant to intentionally misguide the American public, Iranians-Americans and the our government officials. NIAC’s recent strategy of advocating human rights is merely a cover to hide its true intention which is carried out behind the scene to ease sanctions so that big corporations can sell nuclear technology, military gear, sophisticated surveillance technologies, electronic hardware and software applications to a criminal regime which uses them to spy on, arrest, torture, rape and kill its own citizens. As of August 15, 2011, FBI has documented 13 incidents of Iranian spies that are illegally buying and shipping sensitive technologies and missile parts destined for Iran. NIAC’s effort to ease sanctions will ultimately endanger the national security of the United States.

Parsi claims to represent Iranian-Americans, but he is not an Iranian-American. Parsi is not a U.S. citizen; he holds passports from Iran and Sweden.

The Center for Security Policy cites NIAC as a lobby organization for the government of Iran. As a result of a lawsuit, numerous NIAC documents have surfaced that show NIAC lobbies for policies favorable to the regime in Iran. Law enforcement experts, who have reviewed some of NIAC’s emails, memos and board minutes, believe that NIAC has operated as an undeclared lobby and may be guilty of violating tax laws, the Foreign Agents Registration Act and lobbying disclosure laws. Trita Parsi falsely purports to represent Iranian-American interests in the United States. NIAC, as the Iranian-American's "self-appointed" representative in the U.S., has less than 1,000 members, yet Mr. Parsi asserts that it represents the majority of the nearly one million Iranian-Americans in the USA. We are convinced that NIAC and Parsi will eventually be subjected to criminal prosecution and organizations and individuals that collaborate with NIAC will come to regret their affiliations with them. In addition, NIAC has received millions of dollars in grants-including, outrageously, from the Congressionally-funded National Endowment for Democracy, because of its false claims, which could actually have been allocated to further the interests of real Iranian-American human rights and other important causes in the U.S. and around the world. Instead this money has effectively been redirected to furthering the aims of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Currently, the Middle East is in crisis. Pro-democracy forces are springing up daily to demand basic human rights and better living conditions. It is about time that countries such as the United States truthfully align themselves with the democracy seeking people who have suffered brutally at the hands of rapists, dictators and tyrants. It is time to give honor, dignity, moral imperatives and ethical values precedence over lucrative financial contracts that often occur, wrongly, at the expense of ordinary citizens' lives.

By supporting pro-democracy Iranian opposition groups, the world community not only can avert a regional and potentially global catastrophe, it will help establish a lasting pro-Western and democratic system of government in the region. If Iranians are successful in shaking off the yoke of theocracy, their success could herald the failure of a political and militant Islam. Helping Iran become a democracy is not only is a moral imperative, but should be considered an essential US foreign policy priority that will bring a more sustainable and lasting peace to the Middle East.

It might help the honorable Congressman to remember that the Islamic government of Iran does not have any regard for the international laws and occupation of the American embassy was the first step to show their disregard for the international conventions, followed by the execution of top ranking Iranian military officers who had remained neutral based on Iran's constitution and their reign of terror, rape, torture, imprisonment, stoning of women and killings, continues to this day.

We respectfully request the cancellation of this event. We do not think you want to be associated with such an organization, person or Conference. Additionally, we suggest that you meet with real Iranian-Americans and representative experts who can provide a more honest and accurate account of the current situation and opposition forces inside and outside Iran. Furthermore, we know that you have an enduring commitment to encourage democracy and human rights throughout the world and cannot ignore the fact that the current regime in Iran is a major threat to world’s economic stability and world peace.

Respectfully,
Dr. Arash Irandoost, Founder
Pro-Democracy Movement of Iran

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Now why would the 'kuffar', the non Muslims, of Malaysia or anywhere else for that matter, have anything to fear in regards to Islam? Thinking about this question, let alone trying to honestly answer it, has already been either criminalized or heavily discouraged in many places in the world. So should non Muslims fear Islam? Well, anyone still in doubt should perhaps ask the Copts, the Baha'i, the Jews, or other Christians in many other places.

This story comes out of Malaysia, but could apply on a much larger canvas. Muslims here and elsewhere would prefer that infidels remain oblivious and ignorant. You may not care too much about Islam, but Islam in fact very much 'cares' about you. So the Muslims constant exhort us to relax, infidels, and go back to sleep. "Nothing to fear over calls for Muslim unity, says DPM", by Hamdan Raja Abdullah, The Star, 22 August 2011:
MUAR: Non-Muslims in the country have been urged not to feel apprehensive over calls made by leaders for the Muslims to unite.

Deputy Prime Minister [DPM] Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said that as the core community, unity among the Muslims was important for the country’s stability.

This, he said, would also benefit other communities.

Muhyiddin, speaking at the Pagoh Umno division Quran recital session, said it was vital for Muslims to unite under one group to strengthen solidarity.

“I mention this matter because former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had recently said that Muslims in the country have split into three or four groups.

“The splits can be due to political differences or other reasons, and this can weaken the Muslims,” he said.

Muhyiddin, who was accompanied by his wife Puan Sri Norainee Abdul Rahman, said Malaysia had been a model Islamic nation since Independence.

He said that for the past 54 years, the people of various races and religious beliefs had enjoyed peace, prosperity and development, including in education.

Peace in a proclaimed 'Islamic state'? You mean peacefully submitting to Islamic supremacism and foregoing one's freedom forever?
| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This was surely in the works anyway, but the timing is noteworthy as interest rates on student loans are set to become more expensive next year in Britain. "Separate" will indeed be unequal, and anything that doesn't err on the side of resulting in a better deal for Muslim borrowers will likely be decried as punitive, discriminatory (never mind the self-segregation inherent in the demand) and Islamophobic.

One also can't rule out hearing at some point that any delay in finding a solution could result in alienation and "radicalization" by supposedly denying education and discouraging integration. "Muslims demand Sharia student loans because paying interest goes against Islamic law," from the Daily Mail, August 22:

Muslim groups are calling for a separate student loan system because the interest due to be charged will conflict with rules of Sharia law.
The changes to tuition fees, which come into force next year, will see students charged higher rates of interest on the loans they take out to pay for university.
Until now they have paid the market rate of inflation but the reforms mean students who go on to earn more than £21,000 will have to pay interest of up to 3 per cent.

The humanity!

But in some interpretations of Sharia law, which is Islam's legal system and governs every aspect of Muslim life, loans are forbidden.

Loans with interest, or riba are forbidden.

The National Union of Students has said it could be two years before an alternative system is worked out, leaving some Muslims fearing they cannot go on to further education.
The Federation of Student Islamic Societies told The Independent that the rate increase was a 'pressing issue'.
A spokesman said: 'Because the rate of interest is above the rate of inflation, it is quite blatant usury.'
Usury means the practice of lending money and charging the borrower interest, possibly at a very high rate.

Three percent, according to this story.

Mohammed Ahmed-Sheikh, 17, says the changes will discourage him from applying to university next year.
'The fees are the reason I'm having doubts. I'm Muslim and loans are against my religion,' he told The Independent.
Ahmad Mitoubsi, 21, who graduated this year, added: 'We've just had to adapt to the British system or else I couldn't have gone to uni.'
The Department of Business, Innovation and Skills says discussions are ongoing with student groups about a solution.
But it is thought an alternative, such as already happens with mortgages in which education could be 'rented' instead, may not be agreed until the 2013/14 academic year
Sharia law is Islam's legal system. It was derived from the Koran, as the word of God, the example of the life of the prophet Muhammad and fatwas - the rulings of Islamic scholars.

Whose prophet?

It is different to [sic] the legal traditions of the Western world because it governs - or informs - everything about how a Muslim lives.
| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That was back when he was still officially "moderate," and hobnobbing with all manner of dignitaries. "US to re-investigate al-Awlaki – 9/11 links," by Hiba al-Qudsi for Asharq al-Awsat, August 17:

In an exclusive statement to Asharq Al-Awsat, US Department of Justice spokesman, Dean Boyd, has revealed that the US House Committee on Homeland Security – led by Congressman Peter King – has initiated an investigation into US-born Al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki’s possible involvement in the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks.
Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the office of the US Attorney General has in fact already, in cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigations [FBI], initiated a special investigation focusing on al-Awlaki’s possible involvement in the [9/11] attacks.”
He added that this investigation would “review all testimony and documents relating to 9/11, including e-mails and audio recordings made by al-Awlaki, as well as some of the lectures that he delivered at the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in northern Virginia, in addition to reviewing the investigations conducted with him in the aftermath of the attacks.”
However Department of Justice spokesman Dean Boyd refused to comment on when the results of these investigations would be made public.
With the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks fast approaching, Fox News broke the story that the US House Committee on Homeland Security is initiating an investigation into radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, quoting a letter from committee chairman Peter King to US Attorney General Eric Holder.
Investigations confirm that Anwar al-Awlaki was in contact with three of the five hijackers on Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, and the US House Committee on Homeland Security believes that this is more than a coincidence.
The US House Committee on Homeland Security is seeking to determine whether al-Awlaki was involved in the planning or execution of the 9/11 attacks – which are considered the worse terrorist attack on US soil – and the precise nature of his relationship with 3 of the 19 hijackers; namely Hani Hanjour, Nawaf Al-Hazmi, and Khalid al-Mihdhar.
In a three-page letter addressed to US Attorney General Eric Holder, which was sent in May, US Congressman King reveals that the congressional investigation will seek to determine two main issues, namely “to what extent Anwar al-Awlaki wittingly or unwittingly facilitated the plot of the 9/11 hijackers” and “to what extent al-Awlaki was an Al Qaeda operative, offering support to acts of terrorism, prior to 9/11.”
King writes that “there exists a well-documented factual basis for this congressional investigation” adding that “al-Awlaki’s status as an Al Qaeda operative is undeniable.”
The US Congressman relates a number of terrorist incidents that al-Awlaki has been involved in, including “on December 25, 2009, AQAP trained and directed Nigerian national Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to detonate a bomb on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 over Detroit, Michigan. On February 9, 2011, the National Counterterrorism Center Director Michael E. Leiter testified before the Committee on Homeland Security: ‘Anwar al-Awlaki, a dual US – Yemeni citizen and leader within AQAP, played a significant role in the attempted airliner attack.’”
King added “with the years of hindsight into al-Awlaki’s growing status within Al Qaeda, including his involvement in the Christmas Day 2009 attacks, there exists the critical need to reexamine the facts surrounding al-Awlaki and the 9/11 attacks.”
Citing further evidence for reopening the investigation into al-Awlaki, King asserted that “the 9/11 Commission Report suspected that al-Awlaki tasked Jordanian national Eyad al-Rababah in May 2001 to assist two 9/11 hijackers in finding an apartment.” He added that “in 1999, a prior investigation by the San Diego FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) tied al-Awlaki to 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden. A known Al Qaeda procurement agent named Ziyad Khaleel had been in contact with al-Awlaki, and Khaleel had previously purchased a satellite phone for Osama Bin Laden.”
In addition to this, King claims that investigations reveal that “[9/11 hijackers] Al-Mindhar and Al-Hazmi attended the Rabat mosque [in San Diego] where al-Awlaki preached. In addition, al-Awlaki acted as a spiritual advisor to both.”
Additional information further strengthens the relationship between al-Awlaki and a number of the 9/11 hijackers, including the fact that “in January 2001, al-Awlaki relocated to Northern Virginia and began preaching at the Dar al Hijra mosque…four months later, on April 4, 2001, Nawaf Al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour moved from Arizona to Northern Virginia.”
King concluded his letter to the US Attorney General by stressing that “given the greater collection of intelligence and integration of pertinent data since the attacks of 9/11, I believe that al-Awlaki may have played greater roles in the terrorist attacks of 9/11, as well as the other terrorist plots, than those of which we have been previously aware. Accordingly, I request the full assistance of the Department of Justice in carrying out this inquiry.”
US born Al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki has been implicated in a number of terrorist plots against the US, most notably the 2009 “Christmas Day attacks” and the Fort Hood shootings. He has been described by US politicians as “terrorist number one” and “the world’s most dangerous man.” He is currently believed to be in hiding in Yemen, and reports indicate that he is considered so dangerous that the Obama administration may have authorized killing him.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Imam Rauf ran slums in Union, New Jersey, as the city's "worst landlord." Sharif el-Gamal, who famously opined that "when you beat up someone physically you get exercise & stress relief," was evicted from his SoHo office over $39,000 in back rent, and was found to owe $21,000 in fines on a property with 13 violations, along with other unanswered questions about his financial dealings.

We've also known the mosque developers were tax deadbeats to the tune of $224,000. In an application for tax-exempt status, Rauf claimed to operate a mosque that could hold 500 people, but in reality was an apartment that could not hold so many worshipers if they were crammed in like clowns in a Volkswagen. Rauf has also filed a false tax return.

And now there's this. One Union City resident said of Rauf: "he doesn't take care of this building or the building around the corner, and he's going to take care of a mosque?" Similarly, we're supposed to believe this collection of individuals, lionized in the press as heroes of multicultural progress (and "healing"), is operating on the level despite an extensive, demonstrable history of bungling and so many allegations of outright fraud.

"Mosque man robbed us: insurer," by Kieran Crowley for the New York Post, August 22 (thanks to Twostellas):

The self-proclaimed leading moneyman behind the Ground Zero mosque ran a $5.1 million insurance scam that cashed in on car-accident injuries, a lawsuit alleges.
Hisham Elzanaty, 52, ran the "highly developed and sophisticated kickback scheme" for years, Allstate Insurance claims in a federal suit on Long Island.
The scheme routinely submitted inflated medical bills to Allstate and involved illegal fee-splitting, court papers say.
Allstate claimed that Elzanaty fraudulently incorporated medical professional corporations in The Bronx -- which were then used to bill the company for care of patients involved in wrecks.
The operations were fraudulent because Elzanaty is not a licensed medical professional, as required by law, court papers say.
Elzanaty did not return requests for comment.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It will be temporary, as the ceasefire is always intended to be temporary under Islamic law, to allow the Muslim side to re-group and re-arm. Again, the practical effect is that the jihadists can more or less decide when hostilities begin and end as it suits them, knowing also that Israel will be held to the higher end of a double standard in actually observing the arrangement. As they say in Israel, "we cease, they fire."

"Israel and Hamas agree Gaza truce, officials say," from BBC News, August 22:

Israel and Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist group which governs the Gaza Strip, say they have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of violence.
The latest clashes began when militants crossed into southern Israel and killed eight Israelis on Thursday.
Subsequent Israeli air strikes on Gaza killed 15 Palestinians. One Israeli was killed in rocket fire from Gaza.
The Quartet of Middle East peace mediators - the UN, US, EU and Russia - has called for restraint.
Informal truce
A Palestinian official said that Hamas had agreed to ensure that the ceasefire was recognised by smaller militant groups in Gaza - which were responsible for most of the rockets fired at southern Israel in the past few days.
Prior to the announcement, Israeli media reported that 12 rockets launched from the Gaza Strip landed in southern Israel overnight. No injuries resulted.
But on Monday, Gaza's Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) - last to agree to the truce - agreed to halt rocket fire against Israel as a "temporary" measure "for the sake of the Palestinian people".
Earlier, Israel's army radio reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet had decided the military would stop its air strikes on Gaza if militants there halted their attacks.
Like similar arrangements in the past this is not a formal agreement, says the BBC's Yolande Knell in Jerusalem....
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Never mind the secrecy and subterfuge. It's all about the peaceful generation of electricity, and nothing more. And never mind that they're estimated to have enriched half the uranium they would need for a weapon.

Nothing to see here, until we awaken some morning to news of an Iranian nuclear test. "Iran starts moving uranium centrifuges to bunker," from the Telegraph, August 22:

"Transferring Natanz centrifuges to Fordow (near Qom) is under way with full observance of standards," Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani told state broadcaster IRIB. "Fordow's facilities are being prepared and some centrifuges have been transferred." Tehran announced in June that it would shift its production of higher-grade uranium to the underground facility in Fordow, in defiance of international calls to halt uranium enrichment which some countries say is aimed at making nuclear bombs, a charge Iran denies.
Fereidoun Abbasi, the head of the Iranian nuclear programme, said in June Iran would triple output of uranim enriched to 20 per cent, the threshold level from which a nuclear bomb - made from material enriched to 90 per cent - is relative easy to produce.
Since it raised the level of enrichment from the 3.5 per cent purity needed for normal power plant fuel to 20 per cent last year it has produced 56.7 kilogrammes, UN weapons inspectors have reported. That is about half the amount needed for a weapon.
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They know the stakes of the Islamization of Nigeria. For them, unlike some of their Western co-religionists, this is no experiment, and no drawing room discussion of what Sharia could/would/ought to be. They have to deal with it as the supremacist threat that it is to freedom of religion, worship, speech, and conscience. "Bishops condemn Islamic banking, FG’s approach on Boko Haram," by Gbenga Faturoti for Daily Independent, August 21 (thanks to Twostellas):

Catholic and Anglican Bishops weighed in on economic and security matters at the weekend, as both groups criticised the approach of President Goodluck Jonathan to the menace posed by Boko Haram in the North, and expressed concern over Islamic banking.
Over 20 Bishops of the Anglican Communion who congregated at St. Peter’s Anglican Church, Ogharefe Delta State at the First Synod of the Anglican Diocese of Sapele condemned the introduction of Islamic banking.
They urged Abuja to review the conditions for the approval of non-interest banking and make all possible amendments that would ensure the interest of every religious group in Nigeria is protected.
They also tasked political leaders to remember that if they do not alleviate the sufferings of the masses, then their service is not of God.
A communique signed by the host of the meeting, Blessing Erifeta, and the Synod's Clerical Secretary, T. O. Usikaro, condemned Boko Haram extremism, the murder of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members in the North, and ritual killing and kidnapping across the land.
Erifeta tasked Nigerian leaders to remember that they are to attend to the plight of citizens who suffer in the midst of plenty, reverse infrastructure decay, provide drinking water, electricity, good roads – amenities taken for granted in other modern nations.
To fail in this great duty and to begin to serve only personal interests is to fail both man and God, he stressed.
He added: “Every person in position of leadership in churches, politics, civil service ,and the society in general is also included in this call so as to make God’s love be fulfilled in mankind”.
The synod congratulated Jonathan and other public officials on their electoral victory, but pressed the government to strengthen and free the judiciary.
Anglican Primate of Nigeria, Nicholas Okoh, sent a goodwill message to the Bishops who attended the meeting, who included Blessing Enyindah, Dapo Asaju, F.J. Imaekhai, C. I. Ide, P. Onekpe, J.E. Oyepken, John Akao, C.O. Odutemi E. B. Emamezi, O. Obiosa, Ndukwa, Jacob Bada, J.F.E Edewor, P.O. J. Imasuen, Justus Mogekwu, N.A. Enuku, and V.O. Moughereh.
Catholic Bishops of Ibadan, Oyo, Ekiti, Ondo, Osogbo, and Ilorin derided the diplomatic approach Abuja has adopted to tackle Boko Haram, a fundamentalist Islamic sect which has chosen violence to impose Sharia law in the land.
They demanded extensive debate on the proposed Islamic banking, describing the pronouncement by Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Lamido Sanusi, on it as “governance by ambush.”
A communiqué issued at the end of their meeting in Ede, Osun State – signed by Felix Job (President) and Felix Ajakaye (Secretary) – mainatianed that Nigerians should have been allowed to discuss such an important and sensitive issue before Sanusi’s pronouncement.
“We ask the government to facilitate vigorous disinterested and nationwide discussion on the issue for better understanding and resolution of the ‘explosive’ matter,” the communiqué said.
It condemned the handling of Boko Haram, and argued that, “Nigerians will benefit more from strengthening the rule of law, whereby the security agencies will promptly bring criminals to book than negotiate with murderers and criminals.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On the condition that they disarm. Complete, verifiable, irreversible disarmament is well nigh impossible; after all, "war is deceit."

But there is a much larger issue: the imposition of Sharia law on any inch of the Philippines' territory. If they get anywhere on disarmament, we'll likely see the usual claims about Sharia: it isn't really that bad, the nasty parts of Sharia can't/won't happen here, it's flexible and adaptable to our rich multicultural tapestry, and so forth.

The observable effect of Sharia is quite different than the vaporware, academic-exercise brand of "authentic" Sharia that is wandering around Yellowstone National Park with Bigfoot. Wherever there arises a renewed interest in enforcing Sharia, tolerance goes down, harassment goes up, and civil liberties disintegrate, whether in Aceh or Britain's Tower Hamlets. "Philippines offers autonomy to Muslim rebels," by Mark Navales for Agence France-Presse, August 22 (thanks to Twostellas):

The Philippines on Monday offered Muslim rebels waging a decades-long insurgency the prospect of autonomy, but warned they must first lay down their arms and a peace pact was likely years away.
The offer was contained in the government's proposal for peace with the 12,000-strong Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) at the start of three days of talks in the Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur.
"This proposal presents the possibility of a more empowered, more workable and thus, more genuine autonomy of a Bangsamoro (Filipino Muslim) region," the government said in a statement summarising its offer.
The government did not make public all the specific details, but hinted the area could expand and improve the existing Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), which groups five Muslim provinces in the country's troubled south.
The ARMM was created in the 1980s to accommodate the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), then the country's largest Muslim rebel group from which the MILF splintered in 1978.

"Splitters!" Speaking of which, was there any comment from BIFF?

The MNLF signed a peace deal with Manila in 1996, and its leader was made the head of the ARMM, but the government statement described it as a "failed experiment".
The proposal also includes "a system of cooperation" by which the government and the MILF could share revenue from natural resources exploited from the region.
However, for any final peace deal to take place, the government demanded that the MILF disarm and allow its fighters to be rehabilitated into society.
And while describing its proposal as "politically comprehensive", it indicated the most sensitive issues would not be addressed immediately.
"The proposal works with what is available and doable within the next few years. It does not start with contentious and divisive issues whose resolution may not be realisable as yet," the statement said.
Monday's proposal was the first by the government since the Supreme Court in 2008 outlawed another proposed autonomy deal that would have given the MILF control over 700 towns and villages in the south, including some Christian areas.
In retaliation, two senior MILF rebels launched attacks across the south that left about 400 dead and displaced 750,000.
An estimated 150,000 people have died in the conflict, which began in the 1970s.
At an earlier round of peace talks in Kuala Lumpur, the MILF outlined its demands, including the creation of a "sub state" and the larger share of profits from exploiting the region's resources.
MILF spokespeople were not immediately available to give their reactions to the government's latest proposal.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"We know that some of our employees would like a guaranteed prayer time every day. That is not the legal requirement, and it would be impractical to accommodate this without shutting down the production line."

Indeed -- especially since the prescribed times for Muslim prayers change slightly each day. But the Denver Post, as you can see, has decided that these Muslims demanding prayer breaks are victims -- "I'm sorry, I was only praying," and "It's not a good thing when you have a family and you are supporting your wife, your kids" -- and hence must be accommodated, despite the disruption that such accommodation will cause to the plant.

There is a consensus among Muslim scholars that obligatory prayers can -- in fact, must -- be made up at a later time. If, then, one is working and can't get away, one can make up the prayers later. But that is not acceptable to these workers, which reveals that the objective here is not primarily to fulfill a religious obligation, but to make American businesses bend. Here again, wherever American business practice conflicts with Islamic law, it is American business practice that must give way. There is never any bending, any accommodation whatsoever in the other direction.

"Fort Morgan meatpacking plant strives, struggles to accommodate Muslim workforce," by Eric Gorski for The Denver Post, August 21 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

FORT MORGAN — One afternoon this summer, Asha Abuukar said, she approached her supervisor at the Cargill Meat Solutions plant and got permission to go on break.

She washed in accordance with Islamic principles and prayed in a "reflection room" Cargill has set aside where beef is boxed and sealed.

When she returned two minutes late, she said, her supervisor told her that if it happened again, she would be fired.

"I'm sorry," Abuukar, 41, who also runs a Somali market in town, recalled replying. "I was only praying."

Although Cargill's Fort Morgan operation has escaped controversy over accommodating the religious needs of its Muslim workforce, an undercurrent of problems exists, according to current and former workers and Somali translators.

Company officials say they respect religious rights and follow the law but cannot undermine a plant that produces 4 million pounds of beef daily.

"We know that some of our employees would like a guaranteed prayer time every day," said Cargill spokesman Michael Martin. "That is not the legal requirement, and it would be impractical to accommodate this without shutting down the production line."

He said the company accommodates the vast majority of daily prayer requests.

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers cannot deny a "reasonable" religious accommodation request as long as it does not pose an undue hardship, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Muslims pray five times a day at prescribed times that move depending on the sun's position. That can pose challenges for plants with many Muslim workers. One-fourth of Cargill's 2,000 workers are Somali, company officials say.

The number of federal workplace-discrimination complaints filed by Muslims shot up in 2009 and 2010, to almost 800 each year, the EEOC says. Those numbers eclipsed the decade's previous high mark the year after 9/11.

"It's not a good thing when you have a family and you are supporting your wife, your kids," said Abdinasser Ahmed, a former Cargill worker....

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Your tax dollars at work, in ways you never intended: "The US contributed over half a billion dollars ($560 million) from 2009-2010."

Just what you needed to hear in the ongoing debt crisis. Arab donors, by comparison, threw in $7 million. "Do UNRWA schools encourage terror against Israel?" by Anav Silverman for the Jerusalem Post, August 22:

‘Peace starts here” is the key marketing slogan that UNRWA (UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East) uses in its videos, posters and other fundraising material. One UNRWA video clip depicts smiling Palestinian children against backgrounds that feature “peace” graffiti in Gaza.
The video leaves you with the impression that UNRWA has successfully instilled a message of peace into the young generation that has been under UNRWA’s care since the agency’s inception in 1950.
The reality is far different.
Operating under the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), UNRWA is the only UN organization responsible for one select group of refugees. While the UNHCR is mandated to “promote durable solutions” for refugees worldwide, which include such alternatives as “resettlement in third countries”" UNRWA has followed a fundamentally different policy.
Throughout UNRWA’s 60 years, the agency has done nothing to promote creative resolutions to the Palestinian refugee problem. Instead, it has done everything possible to support the Palestinians’ “right of return” aspirations. The agency has fermented a policy that seeks to maintain the Palestinians’ refugee status. UNRWA is the only UN body that assigns the refugee definition not only to refugees but also to their descendants. Thus, from the original 750,000 Palestinian refugees in 1948, UNRWA has now registered 4.7 million living in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza.

More on the problems of the "right of return" that few of its proponents seem to have thought through can be found here.

While the former Commissioner General of UNRWA, Karen AbuZayed, claims UNRWA has helped create a “self-reliant refugee population,” recent protests in Gaza indicate otherwise. In July 2011, UNRWA dropped the words “relief” and “works” from its website’s logo, sparking an outcry among refugees and Hamas leaders, who accused UNRWA of being part of a conspiracy to end their refugee status and deny them the “right of return” to Israel.
The agency tried unsuccessfully to explain that the changes were being made to redesign and upgrade the website on the 60th anniversary of UNRWA, but the massive protests continued, with UNRWA capitulating to the protesters’ demands.
Indeed, this event goes to show just how much the Palestinian population has been rendered totally dependent both psychologically and socially on a refugee status that was supposed to have been temporary and now defines a way of life.
This way of life is further sustained by the UNRWA education system, one of the largest in the Arab world, which does not used textbooks of its own. Instead, UNRWA schools use Palestinian Authority textbooks, which teach anti-Israel attitudes, and implicitly encourage and praise jihad against Israel while promoting the refugees’ return to 1948 homes. The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACTSE), has analyzed these books and found that peace is not mentioned at all. Israel is presented as a usurper, occupier and aggressor, and Jews and Israelis as cunning and deceitful.
Even more disturbing is that certain members of UNRWA’s teaching staff actually carry out jihadist activities themselves.
Take for example, Awad al-Qiq, a respected science teacher and deputy headmaster at the Rafah Prep Boys School run by UNRWA in Gaza. Al-Qiq, who taught at UNRWA schools for eight years, worked by night as a leader of a rocket engineering squad for Islamic Jihad. In response to al- Qiq’s death in an Israeli airstrike in May 2008, Islamic Jihad praised the science teacher as a martyr who would now find ‘paradise.’ The terrorist organization hung a poster in the entrance to the UNRWA school where he taught, praising al-Qiq’s terrorist activities. His students praised his memory, as a “great educator, who departed as a great warrior.”
Although UNRWA spokesman, Chris Gunness said that there was a “zero-tolerance policy toward politics and militant activities in schools,” one can only wonder how a chief terrorist was able to work in a school system for eight years.
Another noted Hamas extremist, Sayed Seyam, was an UNRWA math and science teacher for 23 years from 1980 until 2003.
Seyam was active in the first Palestinian intifada in 1987, and oversaw rocket and mortar attacks against Israel. Another UNRWA employee, Suheil al-Hindi, an UNRWA teachers’ representative in 2003, applauded suicide bombings in a school in the Jabalya refugee camp in Gaza. In 2009, UNRWA’s teachers’ union voted to allow Hamas to control the curriculum both in Gaza and the West Bank. [...]
With UNRWA’s annual budget of one billion dollars per year, the United States, followed by several other western countries, are the leading financial supporters. The US contributed over half a billion dollars ($560 million) from 2009-2010, followed by the European Commission. The UK, Norway, Netherlands and Spain were also among the top 10 donors of 2010. [...]
Much of UNRWA’s budget goes to education.
According to the agency’s website, UNRWA earmarked 52 percent of it regular budget to education in 2009. Only 19 percent was given to health services and 10 percent to relief and social services that year. Arab donors provided only 1.5 percent of UNRWA’s general fund that year ($7 million).
Until UNRWA’s mandate is adjusted to conform to that of UNHCR’s ‘durable solutions,’ Palestinian children under the agency’s care will continue to be educated in a culture that promotes despair and hate in a system that works against their future.
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The case was thrown out for a "lack of evidence." Wink-wink. "Iraqi sniper who shot dead two Marines freed after serving two-and-a-half years for each killing," by Daniel Bates for the Daily Mail, August 21:

They were told that so long as a U.S. marine was still in Iraq, he would remain in jail.
But now, just five years after shooting dead two American soldiers, an Iraqi sniper has been released from prison - and walked away a free man.
Compounding the families’ agony was that the announcement came shortly before the fifth anniversary of the killing.
It was only by sending a letter to senior commanders that they revealed Muhammad Awwad Ahmad had been set free ten months earlier, in November last year.
The disclosure means he could be back on the streets in Iraq shooting dead more people - while the families of Captain John McKenna and Lance Corporal Michael Glover continue to grieve.
Ahmad shot dead Capt McKenna, 30, a state trooper who volunteered for service in Iraq, as his unit was patrolling the Iraqi city of Fallujah on August 16, 2006.
Lance Cpl Glover, 28, was the point man and was mortally wounded as he crossed a street.
Capt McKenna ran to help him but he was shot as he tried to pull him to cover.
The sniper was identified soon after as Ahmad because of his big ears and he was jailed amid promises from the U.S. military that he would see proper justice.
Now that has been exposed as a sham after he was freed serving what amounts to two-and-a-half years for each of the hero soldier’s lives. [...]
They only found out by sending a letter on May 16 to then Defence Secretary Robert Gates in which the elder McKenna inquired what had happened to Ahmad. [...]
Nearly three months went by before the response landed on his doormat on August 4 from William Lietzau, deputy assistant secretary of defence for rule of law and detainee policy.
According to the Daily News it read: ‘Consistent with our legal obligations under (the) Iraq Security Agreement, Ahmad was transferred to Government of Iraq control in June 2010 pursuant to an Iraqi criminal warrant. ... Ahmad's case was reviewed by an Iraqi court, and he was ordered released on October 25, 2010, because of a lack of evidence.'.
The families of both men were horrified and pointed out that Ahmad’s distinctive physical appearance - notably his big ears - made identifying him straightforward.
This allowed the slain men’s fellow Marines to track him down after the killings - and haul him in for the justice he denied his victims....
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 21, 2011

This is the kind of law that the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is trying to compel Western states to adopt. The OIC’s campaign, OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu emphasized in June 2011, was “a matter of extreme priority for the OIC.” And it has met with a good deal of success. In November 2010, the UN General Assembly voted to condemn what it called the “vilification of religion.” Every majority-Muslim state, without exception, supported the resolution. This wasn’t the first time. The UN has previously passed resolutions condemning the “defamation of religion.” A Reuters report claimed that the language was softened in the November 2010 resolution from “defamation” to “vilification” in order to win more support from Western nations, but these words are essentially synonyms, and both dangerously subjective: if a binding resolution were passed, what constitutes “defamation” or “vilification” would presumably be left up to some UN body, which would mean, essentially, that it would be up to the OIC.

The OIC hopes ultimately to compel Western states to criminalize criticism of “matters regarded by followers of any religion or belief as sacred.” The latest iteration of the UN resolution specifically condemned “Islamophobia, Judeophobia and Christianophobia,” but if anything was a sop to Western nations and their bothersome notions of the freedom of speech, it was the inclusion of the last two. Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ, Chris Ofili’s dung- and pornography-encrusted Holy Virgin Mary, and a thousand anti-Semitic caricatures in the Arabic media vilifying Jews and Judaism in the crudest terms, never gave rise to any calls for United Nations action against “defamation” or “vilification” of religions. The OIC is the driving force behind such resolutions, and its aim is to proscribe “Islamophobia.”

In other words, it wants the U.S. and Europe to adopt Islamic blasphemy laws, such as the one this Facebook commenter fell afoul of in Egypt.

"Egypt police arrest man for Facebook 'Islam insults,'" from AFP, August 21 (thanks to Wimp Boy):

CAIRO (AFP) - Cairo police arrested a man who allegedly 'insulted Islam' in postings on Facebook after they tracked him down through his internet address, state news agency MENA reported on Saturday.

The agency said the 23-year-old, identified only as Ayman Y.M., posted comments 'that were insulting to the Koran and the Prophet Mohammed and Islam and Muslims.' It did not disclose what he allegedly said.

The youth was referred to the prosecution, which may charge him under a law that penalises 'insulting religion.'...

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How about a word along those lines to Gaza?

Of course not. All of the Palestinian factions know that if Israel cannot hold Hamas accountable as the entity that is, after all, putatively in control of Gaza, there will exist a perfect arrangement of plausible deniability among jihadist groups: everyone benefits, and no one can face consequences if no one can be held responsible.

Pass the buck, and watch the rockets fly. "Barrage of rockets from Gaza strike Israel; sites in Gaza targeted," from CNN, August 21:

Jerusalem (CNN) -- A barrage of rockets and mortars fired into southern Israel continued Sunday, the latest in a four-day escalation of violence sparked by a series of attacks on Israeli civilians and soldiers Thursday.
By noon Sunday, 20 incoming rockets had been reported by Israeli officials.
An eighth victim died from Thursday's attacks, Israeli police said Sunday. He was identified as Yitzhak Sela, a 56-year-old bus driver.
The attacks on buses, cars and security personnel killed six other Israeli civilians and one soldier and wounded more than 30 people, authorities said.
Since then, nearly 100 rockets have been fired into Israel, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Brig. Gen. Yoav (Poly) Mordechai said Sunday. At least one Israeli was killed in an attack in Beer Sheva, authorities said. [...]
The office of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, in a statement Sunday, said Israel's "rogue behavior must end."
The Palestinian government "calls upon the Israeli government to cease and desist in its use of its unjustified aggression against the Palestinian people in Gaza and to respect international law and refrain from revenge, terror, and collective punishment tactics," the statement said.....

Once again: how about a word along those lines to Gaza?

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It was only Friday that Hamas declared the truce was off. As the Israeli response has escalated, and they may face actual consequences for the latest bombardment of southern Israel with rocket fire, they've changed their minds.

It is a calculated move, of course, hoped to have the practical effect of allowing Hamas and jihadists who feel threatened enough to play along to declare when hostilities begin and end as it suits them. They know that Israel will be held to an international double standard where it will be expected to adhere to any truce, while the jihadists can make virtually any excuse they like for continuing rocket fire on a lower level of intensity. As the saying in Israel goes, "We cease, they fire."

More on this story. "Report: Gaza groups discuss ceasefire," by Elior Levy for YNet News, August 21:

Leaders of Gaza's militant groups convened in Cairo Sunday to discuss a possible cease-fire with Israel, according to an Islamic Jihad official.
Just a short while later reports emerged of the meeting, two mortar shells were fired at Eshkol Regional Council, and Palestinian sources in Gaza reported airstrikes had resumed.
According to sources, seven people were injured in an Air Force bombing of a Hamas outpost. A training camp belonging to Al-Ahrar Brigades was also bombed, as well as an open area near Nuseirat refugee camp, reports say. No casualties were reported in the latter strikes.
In online messages published in forums linked to Hamas and Fatah, the Gaza Strip government allegedly informed all Palestinian factions about a lull agreement, calling them to stop firing at Israel, which reportedly goes into effect on 9 pm Sunday.
According to Islamic Jihad official Ahmed Mudalal, the discussions were based on a lull agreement draft sent by United Nations envoy to the Middle East Robert Serry. Mudalal clarified that the Palestinian factions do not plan on handing Israel a lull agreement "free of charge," adding they will demand an immediate halt to Israel attacks in Gaza.
"The Islamic Jihad, as well as the rest of the Palestinian factions, are trying to spare our people from the agony of war," emphasized Mudalal. "However if it's enforced upon them, then the people must show patience and the resistance must protect ithem [sic] with all its might."
Possilbe [sic] cease-fire?
Meanwhile, Islamic Jihad's Secretary-General Ramadan Abdullah Shallah is said to be arriving in Cairo for consultations with Hamas and Egyptian officials, according to a report in Egypt's Al-Ahram newspaper.
The report further stated that talks about a possible cease-fire had already started up on Saturday, after Hamas officials claimed they were not interested in escalating the already heated situation between them and Israel.
Quoting a top-ranking Palestinian official, the report claimed Hamas was trying to persuade the Islamic Jihad's military wing to stop attacking Israel.
However Jerusalem officials claimed Sunday they have no knowledge of such plans for a cease-fire or a lull agreement with the Palestinians.
| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This situation carries major implications for Hamas' control of Gaza, and may partially explain both the moves to challenge its authority by other Iranian-supported groups such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Popular Resistance Committee, and the current flareup of jihadist violence in and around Gaza.

Hamas is caught in the middle of attempting a balancing act between its mostly Sunni Arab constituency and its Shi'ite Iranian backers. It apparently chose its Arab loyalties, and Tehran is signaling to the group that it has other options. "Diplomats: Iran cuts back on Hamas funding due to Syria unrest," from Reuters, August 21:

Iran has cut back or even stopped its funding of Hamas after the Islamist movement, which rules the Gaza Strip, failed to show public support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, diplomats said on Sunday.
One diplomat, who asked not to be identified, said intelligence reports showed that Iran had reduced funding for Hamas. Other diplomatic sources, also relying on intelligence assessments, said the payments had stopped over the past two months.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hope doesn't make a governable state. Here again, as with all the blood and treasure squandered on "hearts and minds" in Iraq and Afghanistan (often translating into millions of dollars lost in the wrong hands) we see foreign policy based on wishful thinking and a fixation on other people's "feelings." We have already witnessed the disaster of policy-making that is based at heart on such speculation and the self-congratulating, hubris-laden expectation that the way things "ought" to work out is the way they will work out because the action taken was rooted in good intentions.

The global war on "underlying causes" that we find ourselves in turns a blind eye to the reality that countries and territories are not emotional entities that would straighten up and fly right if they just felt better. It is indeed condescending not to take into account that a given territory's governing entity is as rational, shrewd and calculating as the next one, and has its own agenda to advance.

The PA wants the UN to do its dirty work for it, to be handed a state in an exception to the usual expectations of international law. Speaking of "hope," the PA likely hopes the need to define the new state's borders will set up a UN-mandated land grab on behalf of "Palestine," granting a do-over and reversal of so many lost wars with Israel.

And what the UN gives "Palestine," the PA expects the UN will feel obligated not to allow to fail, even though the entity that would result would be unable to govern itself, and utterly dependent on outside help for material sustenance, and to keep the peace between Palestinian rivals.

"Spain says it supports the Palestinian bid for statehood," from Reuters, August 21:

MADRID - Spain hopes a meeting of European Union foreign ministers on Sept. 2 will bring progress towards the recognition of a Palestinian state, Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs Trinidad Jimenez said on Sunday.
"There's the feeling that now is the time to do something, to give the Palestinians the hope that a state could become reality," she said in an interview with El Pais newspaper published on Sunday.
"We have to give them some signal, because if we don't it could generate great frustration for the Palestinian people."
The meeting of EU foreign ministers in Sopot, Poland comes ahead of a United Nations General Assembly meeting later in September where Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is seeking to upgrade the Palestinians' status, but is unlikely to emerge with full UN membership for his country.
More likely is an upgrade of the Palestinian territories to become a non-member state from its current status as an observer. That would not need Security Council approval and would elevate the Palestinians' UN status to equal that of the Vatican.
The Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chairman Shaul Mofaz (Kadima) postponed on Saturday the presentation of findings on the possible repercussions of a Palestinian declaration of statehood at the UN in September.
Mofaz has criticized the government numerous times in recent months, accusing it of being unprepared for the consequences of the expected UN vote.
“If the diplomatic process for September had been significant, most of the army’s preparations would not have been necessary,” he said after IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz briefed the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee last month.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An Arabia-Ain't-Felix Update, following al-Qaeda's takeover of a third town earlier this week. The dual attacks, the targets, and the tactic of suicide bombing all suggest al-Qaeda's involvement. "Suicide blasts kill 11 tribesmen in southern Yemen," by Ahmed al-Haj for the Associated Press, August 21:

SANAA, Yemen (AP) — A pair of suicide bombings targeting anti-al-Qaida tribesmen in southern Yemen killed 11 people on Sunday, tribal and security officials said.
Both blasts took place in Abyan province, where al-Qaida-linked militants have been taking advantage of a breakdown in security linked to Yemen's political turmoil to take over towns and large swaths of territory in the south.
In the deadliest attack, a suicide bomber slammed an explosives-laden car into a checkpoint manned by anti-al-Qaida tribesmen, killing eight and wounding 20.
A suicide bomber carried out the second attack, blowing himself up in the middle of a gathering of tribesmen, the officials said. Three men were killed in the second attack.
The officials said suspicion immediately fell on al-Qaida-linked militants in the area who have routinely targeted tribesmen hostile to the terror network or formed militias to fight its members.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
Yemen is home to one of the world's most active al-Qaida branches, known as al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.
| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us


January in Cairo

The push to end the peace with Israel continues in the glorious new democratic Egypt of the Arab Spring. I tried to tell you: "Egypt 'Spiderman' hero pulls down Israel flag," from AFP, August 21 (thanks to Eric):

A lone protester became a hero to an exultant crowd of Egyptians and many more online by hauling down the Star of David flag atop Israel's embassy in Cairo after the border killing of Egyptian policemen.

More than 1000 protesters gathered outside the Israeli embassy early Sunday and let off celebratory fireworks when the man clambered to the top floor of a high-rise housing the mission, replacing the flag with an Egyptian one.

Egypt's cabinet said an Israeli statement expressing regret for the deaths of the policemen was not enough, but stopped short of saying if it would recall its envoy from Tel Aviv.

Tensions between the Jewish state and the most populous Arab nation have surged since the deaths on Thursday of the police officers, which occurred as Israeli troops pursued militants responsible for deadly attacks near Eilat.

It represents the most serious test of Israel's landmark 1979 peace treaty with Egypt since an uprising overthrew Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak in February.

Egypt's military rulers and caretaker cabinet are under populist pressure to take a firm stand.

The man who took down the flag, identified as Ahmed Shehat, was led away by protesters after he descended, but not before some tore up the Israeli flag he carried down with him and kept bits as souvenirs.

Other demonstrators burnt Israeli and US flags.

Shehat became an instant idol with one Egyptian presidential candidate, Hamdeen Sabahi, hailing him as "the people's hero" on Twitter.

Shehat was labelled the "Egyptian Spiderman" and "Flagman" on Twitter and he trended rapidly on the social networking site as Egyptians and others worldwide expressed their admiration for his stunt.

"This is for Palestine. This is for Egypt. This is for every Arab. This is for every free person," one Twitter user posted.

"Forget Spiderman, Batman, or Superman. My kids are going to grow up wanting to be like FlagMan," wrote another.

In telephone call to a television station, Shehata said he felt "undescribable happiness" after the risky feat.

"This is something perhaps more than a billion Arabs long to do, to tear up the Israeli flag," he told Al-Jazeera Mubashir Misr, the Qatar-based broadcaster's Egyptian affiliate.

"We want to expel people who are killing us. Those Jews and Zionists are part of the old regime, and we want to cut all our ties with the old regime," he said.

He said he managed to sneak to a lower, adjacent building as soldiers and policemen were changing guard and then climbed up to the embassy's flagpole.

In footage aired on local TV, a man could be seen climbing to the flagpole to exchange flags.

Military police in riot gear stood outside the embassy building but did not intervene to halt the protest. Two military police generals walked into the crowd to try to calm the demonstrators.

"Look, what happened is Israeli soldiers were chasing some gunmen on the border, they opened fire and hit our men by mistake. That's all there is to it. They didn't enter our territory," said one of the generals.

But they were rebuked by the protesters, who demanded that the military take a firmer stand against Israel. Hundreds of protesters remained outside the embassy on the Nile River as dawn broke over Cairo.

Egypt's cabinet insisted on a firm timetable to execute an Israeli offer of a joint investigation into the border deaths, according to the state news agency MENA.

"The Israeli statement was positive on the surface, but it was not in keeping with the magnitude of the incident and the state of Egyptian anger toward Israeli actions," a cabinet statement said.

"Egypt affirms its solicitude for maintaining peace with Israel, but Israel must also assume responsibility for protecting this peace," it added.

On Saturday afternoon, the foreign ministry summoned Israel's charge d'affaires for a reprimand.

The envoy, who answered the summons because the ambassador was outside the country, read out a statement by Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak expressing regret for the deaths and offering a joint probe, Egypt's foreign ministry said.

Egyptian state television had reported earlier that Egypt would recall its ambassador from Tel Aviv. But Israel said it had received no notification of the decision....

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

If there is any truth to this at all, Hamas is not doing this because deep down, they really, really want a Palestinian state living side-by-side in peace with Israel. It is solely that Hamas is trying to get Islamic Jihad to stop because the clueless dhimmis are giving them Israel on a platter as it is, so why complicate matters?

"'Hamas talking to Islamic Jihad in effort to halt rockets,'" from the Jerusalem Post, August 21:

Hamas has been holding talks with the Islamic Jihad over the weekend in an effort to convince the terror organization to stop firing rockets into Israel and resume the de facto truce that has been in place for two years, Egyptian daily Al-Ahram reported on Sunday.

According to the report, Hamas leaders from Damascus told Egyptian officials that the group is not interested in an escalation with Israel at the moment, saying it does not believe it is in the interest of the Palestinians.

Hamas, in talks with Islamic Jihad's armed wing, the Al-Quds Brigades, said that it wanted the crossings with Israel re-opened so that goods and commodities could enter Gaza during Ramadan, Al-Ahram said.

Hamas's armed wing, the Izzadin al-Kassam Brigades, the report added, was not participating in the rocket fire that saw over 80 projectiles fired into Israel from the Strip over the weekend.

Speaking with Israel Radio Sunday morning, an IDF spokesman said that while Hamas was not itself firing rockets, the IDF holds it responsible for all activity taking place in and emanating from the Gaza Strip.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Thursday's attack was designed to be an act of war -- well beyond the more routine rocket attacks. This report illustrates the coordinated assault that Israeli forces faced more fully than prior coverage. "IDF officer: Terrorists planned an abduction attack," by Yaakov Katz for the Jerusalem Post, August 21:
The terrorists who infiltrated Israel on Thursday and carried out the attacks near Eilat were heavily armed, wore suicide bomb belts and came with handcuffs, an indication they planned to abduct a soldier, deputy commander of the Sagi Brigade along the Egyptian border said on Saturday.

They hoped to follow Hamas in its abduction of Gilad Shalit (still a prisoner after 5 years), and Hizballah in their capture of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev, whose bodies were later swapped for release of the murderer Samir Kuntar.

“We prevented a major abduction attack,” Lt.-Col. Liran Hajbi, deputy commander of the Edom Division’s Sagi Brigade, which is responsible for the Egyptian border, said on Saturday. “They came heavily armed, with suicide bomb belts, grenades, and handcuffs.”
According to Hajbi, the terrorists were split into a number of cells, mostly deployed along the border and still inside Egypt.
Three terrorists who crossed into Israel were killed by soldiers from the Golani Brigade’s reconnaissance battalion and another five were killed in subsequent gunfights with the police’s Yamam Counterterrorism Unit.
“We were well-prepared,” he said. “While the beginning was bad with the murder of the civilians, the way the soldiers operated when they arrived on the scene prevented a more difficult outcome.”
Maj. Ro’i Yonatan, commander of the Golani Brigade’s Orev company, which was the first to arrive at the scene, said his soldiers acted courageously when driving straight into the line of fire and running over one of the terrorists.
“The soldiers then drove to the other end of the road, blocked it so Israeli cars would not approach and returned to draw the fire away from civilians,” Yonatan said.
He said St.-Sgt. Moshe Naftali – the soldier who was killed on Thursday, was shot when he and additional soldiers exited the jeep to begin engaging the terrorists deployed along the border.
“They were coming under fire from three different directions and they saw one of the terrorists throw a grenade at them,” Yonatan said. “They stopped the jeep, got out and Moshe got hit.”
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

m6.jpeg

Life imitates naughty infidel art, but you're not supposed to notice.

Not surprisingly, the Taliban have ignored Karzai's protests. "3rd 'Turban bomb' attack rocks southern Helmand province," by Matt Dupee for the Long War Journal, August 20:

For the third time this summer, a Taliban suicide bomber with an explosive device hidden within his traditional Afghan headdress detonated at an Afghan government center. The Friday attack occurred during a ceremony marking Afghanistan's Independence Day held at the Helmand Military Corps Center. Three Afghan National Policemen were wounded in the attack.
The Taliban-led insurgency is increasingly relying upon formerly-taboo tactics such as female suicide bombers and bombs rigged to traditional Afghan headdresses, called lungee, referred to by the West as "turbans." These tactics have raised the ire of many Afghan communities, particularly among those in Kandahar and Helmand. Afghan lungee are not searched at security checkpoints because of the acute level of cultural sensitivity regarding headdresses. The Taliban have exploited this dynamic and conducted at least three such "turban-bombings" since July 14.
On July 14, a Taliban suicide bomber detonated his headdress during a funeral ceremony for the slain half-brother of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, killing four people, including the ulema council leader, Maulvi Hikmatullah Hikmat, and another senior religious cleric. The National Directorate of Security chief for Kandahar, General Mohammed Naim Momin, immediately condemned the attack and said it violated the Pashtun legal code known as Pashtunwali. "We respect those people who wear turbans and did not check the turban as a sign of respect, but he betrayed this respect and hid explosives in his turban," he told the New York Times.
On July 27, a suicide bomber killed the mayor of Kandahar City, Ghulam Haidar Hamidi, after he exited a meeting and was speaking on his cellphone in a courtyard. The bomber rigged a small amount of explosives in his lungee and approached Hamidi, locking him in a bear hug before detonating the device that killed both of them.
By Aug. 9, President Karzai had met with ulema councils from around Afghanistan and urged a collective strategy to help end the use of "turban bombs" before the phenomenon became more widespread. Karzai asked the clerics to launch a public information campaign to "convince militants not to use turbans and other religious attire to carry out suicide bombings, not to target mosques and to make them aware that suicide was un-Islamic," according to a spokesman for Karzai.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The "Palestine" to be voted on at the U.N. does not meet the criteria for statehood under international law. Abbas wants the U.N. to rip the proverbial training wheels off of the Palestinian entity when it has never even been able to function like a state with them. If its past few years of governing Palestinian territories have been a trial run, the Palestinian Authority has failed miserably.

Even the Obama administration appears to recognize a disaster waiting to happen. "Report: US threatened to halt aid if PA goes to UN," by Eilor Levy for the Associated Press, August 21:

Associated of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad say that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton threatened in a phone conversation to halt the American aid to the Palestinians if they ask the United Nations to recognize an independent Palestinian state in September.
The sources noted that Clinton told Fayyad that this would happen if the Palestinians fail to give the American administration a chance to resume peace negotiations with Israel. The sources added that Fayyad relayed the message to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

For any peace negotiations, there is also the matter of the PA's reconciliation with Hamas. The PA cannot simultaneously be for peace with Israel and cooperating with a group that is actively and openly out to destroy the Jewish state.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 20, 2011

Lebanon is dying, its sovereignty now symbolic. It is the name on the mailbox, but Syria and Iran run the house, via Hizballah. More on this story. "Lebanon denies report it knows location of Hariri killers," from the Jerusalem Post, August 20:

Lebanese state prosecutor Saeed Mirza on Saturday denied reports made by one of the Hezbollah members indicted for the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri that the government in Beirut knows his location but is unable to arrest him, Lebanese newspaper The Daily Star reported.
"The Lebanese authorities know where I live, and if they wanted to arrest me they would have done it a long time ago. Simply, they cannot," said one of the of the accused assassins of the former Lebanese prime minister.
One of the Hezbollah members accused accused of killing Hariri gave an exclusive interview to Time Magazine on Thursday in which he blamed Israel for the assassination, which took place in Beirut on February 15, 2005. He said that he would never turn himself in, nor would Hezbollah ever let him or his comrades go to trial.
In the interview, the militant, who refused to allow his name to be published despite proving his identity to the Time Magazine reporter, accused the Mossad of assassinating Hariri and forging evidence against him and his organization. He also said that the UN-backed Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) had no teeth and that even though the Lebanese government knew where he lived and worked they would not be able to arrest him because Hezbollah would not let them.
The STL released a detailed indictment on August 17 in the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri. Four suspects, Mustafa Amine Badreddine, a senior Hezbollah figure and brother-in-law of slain Hezbollah commander Imad Moughniyeh, Salim Jamil Ayyash, Hussein Hassan Oneissi and Assad Hassan Sabra were named and their methods of operation were detailed in the report....

The tribunal now also says three other assassinations may be connected.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That took them long enough, considering that bin Laden was dead and buried at sea in the beginning of May. They're also making a big deal of launching this in mid-Ramadan. While escalations of jihadist hostilities during Ramadan are commonplace, the members of al-Qaeda in Iraq can't call themselves The Punctual Jihadists here.

They would be out for slaughter anyway, of course; bin Laden is the excuse du jour, and invoking him is an attempt to rally support. Their aim remains the fundamental aim of jihad in all its forms: to impose Islamic law. "Al-Qaida in Iraq: 100 attacks to avenge bin Laden," by Qassim Abdul-Zahra for the Associated Press, August 20:

BAGHDAD (AP) — Al-Qaida in Iraq has vowed to carry out "100 attacks" across the country, starting in the middle of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, to exact revenge for the death of Osama bin Laden.
The terror group's statement was released on militant websites late Friday. It said the attacks will avenge bin Laden, who was killed by U.S. forces in Pakistan in May, and other slain senior al-Qaida leaders.
"By God's will, the campaign starts in the middle of the fasting month (of Ramadan) and ends by God's will after 100 attacks exactly," it said.
The statement said the campaign would include "varied attacks, including raids, martyrdom operations (suicide attacks), roadside bombs, silenced guns and snipers, in all cities, rural areas and provinces" across Iraq.
Monday marked the middle of Ramadan.
On that day, a wave of crushing attacks swept across Iraq — from the northern city of Mosul to the southern Shiite heartland. At least 70 people died in suicide bombings, roadside bombs and shootings in what was Iraq's deadliest day this year.
Al-Qaida did not explicitly claim responsibility for those attacks in Friday's statement, but the chaos is widely believed to be the work of al-Qaida in Iraq.
A little over a year ago, U.S. and Iraqi officials said the deaths of al-Qaida in Iraq's two top leaders in a raid had dealt a severe blow to the organization. The group has suffered from a drop in funding and just two weeks ago was calling on former members to come back to the fold, a sign of its diminished status.
But Monday's violence suggests that al-Qaida in Iraq has the ability to resurrect itself and still carry out vicious attacks.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

All of this should have been a non-event, even if the hikers strayed over the border. Only the Iranians know whether they are actually paranoid enough to believe the hikers were spies, or just saw an opportunity to seize the three and parade them before the world as trophies.

In any event, the two remaining in Iranian custody ought to be considered hostages. As long as they are detained, the Iranians will indeed attempt to use them as bargaining chips in any way they believe could work. An update on this story. "Two American hikers sentenced to eight years in an Iranian jail," from the Associated Press, August 20:

Two American men already held for two years in Tehran have been sentenced to eight years each in prison on charges of espionage and illegal entry into Iran, state TV reported on Saturday.
The announcement appeared to dash hopes for the imminent release of Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal after Iran's foreign minister suggested earlier this month that the trial could clear the way for their freedom.
The Americans deny the charges and say they were only hiking in a scenic and largely peaceful area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border.
The two men have been held since July 2009 after being taken into custody on the Iran-Iraq border. A third American who was taken with them, Sarah Shourd, was released in September 2010 on $500,000 bail and returned to the United States. Shourd's case 'is still open,' the website irinn.ir reported.

Bauer and Fattal's prison terms may also be used as leverage to attempt to make Shourd return for trial in exchange for reductions in their sentences.

The Americans say they mistakenly crossed into Iran when they stepped off a dirt road while hiking near a waterfall. While other parts of Iraq remain troubled by violence, the semiautonomous Kurdish north has drawn tourists in recent years, including foreigners.
The case has added to tensions between the United States and Iran that were already high over other issues, including Tehran's disputed nuclear program. The U.S. government has appealed for the two men to be released, insisting that they have done nothing wrong. The two countries have no direct diplomatic relations, so Washington has been relying on an interests section at the Swiss Embassy in Tehran to follow the case.
Earlier this month, Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said he hoped 'the trial of the two American defendants who were detained for the crime of illegally entering Iran will finally lead to their freedom.' Their lawyer also had expressed hope they might receive a pardon for the Islamic holy month of Ramadan....

There may well also be pressure on Fattal and Bauer to convert to Islam to improve their chances of Ramadan clemency.

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Lest anyone be swayed by recent Malaysian government flourishes (such as the recent decision to formalise relations with the Vatican), if you're a Malaysian Muslim, you can be rest assured that your government is looking out for number one. According to a statement made today by no less a personage than the Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister, at the top of the government's agenda is the plan to continue what is called 'safeguarding Bumiputra interests'. This means, for all intents and purposes, Islamic supremacy, as 'Bumiputra' equals Muslim. "DPM: Safeguarding Bumiputra interests remains govt’s main agenda", The Star, 20 August 2011:

SHAH ALAM: Assisting and safeguarding the interest and welfare of the Bumiputra remains the main agenda of leaders and the government, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said.

"So, the Bumiputra need not worry if the word Bumiputra is not used or repeated numerous times when implementing policies or the New Economic Policy," he said when closing the two-day convention "Empowering the New Economic Model: A Bumiputera Economic Jihad", organised by the Gagasan Badan Ekonomi Melayu (GABEM) [Malay Economic Association] at Universiti Teknologi Mara, here Saturday.

Muhyiddin said that though the interest and welfare of all races would be taken into consideration when implementing the country's economic development policy, the interest of the Malays and Bumiputra would not be denied or forgotten.

"I myself am not willing to see a situation where no effort is made to help or assist Malays, as long as they are needed," said Muhyiddin when commenting on recent speculation and perception by some that the leaders and government was not giving importance to Bumiputra.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I tried to tell you. "Egypt to withdraw Israel envoy over Sinai shootings," from the BBC, August 20 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Egypt says it will withdraw its ambassador to Israel in protest at the deaths of five policemen, reportedly shot by Israeli forces on Thursday.

Cairo said it held Israel politically and legally responsible, and demanded an investigation and an apology.

Israel has promised to investigate the deaths, amid claims that Israeli forces killed the officers while chasing suspected Palestinian militants.

It is the first time in a decade that Egypt has withdrawn its ambassador.

The BBC's Yolande Knell in Jerusalem says it marks a sharp escalation in tensions between Israel and Egypt.

The 30-year-old peace treaty was already being tested after the long-time Egyptian leader, Hosni Mubarak, was forced from office earlier this year, our correspondent says.
'Erosion of order'

The latest violence began on Thursday when gunmen attacked buses near the Israeli Red Sea resort of Eilat, killing eight people.

Egyptian officials say Israeli forces chased the suspected militants across the border, and a number of people were killed - including the policemen.

Hundreds of Egyptians protested outside the Israeli embassy in Cairo overnight, burning the Israeli flag and demanding that the Israeli ambassador be expelled from the country. Protests were reportedly continuing on Saturday morning.

As the numbers of protesters grew outside the Israeli embassy in Cairo, the chants grew louder.

Protesters called for the embassy to be closed and the ambassador expelled. They burned the Israeli flag and tore down the metal barriers at the entrance of the embassy.

Some protesters carried pictures of the late Egyptian President, Gamal Abdel Nasser, known for his open anti-Israeli stance.

Such scenes were unheard-of during the Mubarak era.

Security is tight around the embassy, two military vehicles could be seen in front of the building, and armoured emergency vehicles were also at the scene.

"We don't want any ties with Israel," one protester, Ahmed Aggoura, told the BBC.

"Israel is only interested in a subservient Egypt, not a free Egypt. By protesting outside the embassy we're sending them a clear message. This is not Mubarak's Egypt anymore. If you kill our soldiers, there will be consequences."

On Friday, in Egypt's second city, Alexandria, a protester managed to take down the Israeli flag from the consulate there and replaced it with Egyptian and Palestinian flags.

After the initial Eilat attack, Israel expressed concern about security in the Sinai Peninsula and said Palestinian attackers had reached Eilat after entering Egypt from Gaza and travelling through the Sinai desert.

But the Egyptian cabinet issued a statement on Saturday denying it had lost control of the Sinai and demanding an apology from the Israeli leadership over "the sad and hasty remarks about Egypt".

"The Egyptian ambassador to Israel will be withdrawn until we are notified about the results of an investigation by the Israeli authorities," said the statement.

Cairo said it regarded the attack as a breach of the 1979 peace treaty between the two nations, and blamed Israel for lax border controls.

Under Mr Mubarak, ties between the two nations had been stable after a history of conflict.

But Mr Mubarak's ousting in a popular uprising has sparked fears among Israeli officials that a less amenable government could take charge in Cairo.

And correspondents say the Sinai desert region of Egypt has become increasingly lawless since Mr Mubarak was ousted, with a rise in militant activity inspired by al-Qaeda....

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

NorquistPerry.jpg


I do not understand this unseemly rush to anoint Perry without vetting him. I've never seen anything like this: friends have broken with me, I've been attacked on hitherto friendly websites, I've gotten calls from people I haven't heard from in years, telling me to lay off Perry, and more -- all because I dared to raise some concerns about Rick Perry. Perry may be the greatest thing since microwave popcorn, but I remain concerned about his closeness to Grover Norquist and other matters. And I don't think it's illegitimate to ask Perry to address these concerns.

And today, Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi, whom we have seen do this kind of thing before, attacks Pamela Geller in the American Thinker because she dared to question Perry. Also in the Thinker today, Geller responds:

In his piece attacking me for raising questions about Rick Perry's associations, "Smearing Perry on Jihad," Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi leaves out the most salient parts of my information about Perry, and then attacks me as if they don't exist.

He says that "the Ismailis favor an interpretation of jihad as working on and financing charitable, economic projects to improve the well-being of humanity as a whole," accuses me of "smear-by-association," and points out that "the Ismailis do not advocate violence or advancement of Shari'a in politics anywhere in the world today." He adds that "it is therefore difficult to see how Perry and the Aga Khan are working to advance an Islamization cause via 'taqiyya,'" although I never suggested any such thing.

Jawad ignores what I wrote here: "The Ismailis are peaceful, yes, and the Aga Khan Foundation is an established Islamic charity. But the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development is also part-owner of the Pakistan-based Bank al-Habib, which Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl's widow Mariane sued in 2007 for damages relating to its funding of al-Qaida and involvement in the murder of her husband by Islamic jihad terrorists. She dropped the suit later that year without explanation, except to note that the Habib Bank had never answered her charges."

There is more. The Aga Khan Development Network made has signed agreements with the Syrian Government to develop "microfinance, healthcare, and cultural tourism" in Syria. Between 2003 and 2008, the Aga Khan spent $40 million to develop business in Syria. Syria is, don't forget, still listed as a State Sponsor of Terrorism. And according to investigative reporter Mark Mitchell, "the Aga Khan Foundation's membership and supporters also include top military officers in Syria, such as General Moustapha Sharba, who had a hand in the early stages of the covert nuclear weapons program that Syria was developing with help from North Korea (and probably Iran)."

Don't Sharba and the others know that the Ismailis are peaceful? Is it really illegitimate to ask questions about a candidate who is friendly with someone who owns an alleged al-Qaeda bank, and spends millions to develop a State Sponsor of Terrorism?

Also, in an interview with Spiegel, the Aga Khan doesn't sound so moderate. He says there is not a clash of civilizations, but a "clash of ignorance," for which the "Western world" is "essentially" responsible. Never mind all the jihad terror attacks. The problem is the West's "ignorance." He says that the West should negotiate with Hamas, and says that the cartoons of Muhammad should not have been published, so as to show "civility" to Muslims. Free speech? Forget it.

Jawad also criticizes me for pointing out that the curriculum that Perry has gotten from the Aga Khan for Texas schools is "whitewashing Islam's bloody historical and modern-day record." I stand by my words. A reader of my website AtlasShrugs.com has examined the curriculum and found numerous questionable aspects of it. "The religion that the Prophet Muhammad preached provided his followers an ethical and moral vision for leading a life of righteousness," it tells kids. Muhammad's jihad conquests and cultural annihilations? His child marriage? Forget it. The curriculum also discusses "the beauty and perfection of the Qur'an." Calls to jihad? Calls to hate unbelievers and wage war against them? Nothing.

Then Jawad turns to my criticism of Perry's ties to Grover Norquist, saying, "one need only note, as Pipes did, that all of Perry's connections to Norquist concern taxation issues, not Islam." That's the kind of thinking people use to say that Hezbollah is a fine group, because look, they run schools and hospitals. No candidate worth his salt should have anything to do with Norquist, for tax issues or any other reason. You can't come out for cutting taxes without playing ball with Norquist? Please.

And Perry's ties to Norquist are extensive: Robert Spencer notes that "Perry and Grover Norquist held a joint press conference in March 2011. Perry appeared at a fund-raiser for Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform group. Also, Norquist actively campaigned for Perry back in 2009. Their association is longstanding: Perry was investigated by the Texas Ethics Commission in 2004 for allegations that the Governor illegally used campaign money to finance a trip to Bahamas; the point here is not the allegations, but the fact that along on the Bahamas trip at his own expense was Grover Norquist. Perry and Norquist are clearly not just casual acquaintances."

So what will happen when Norquist approaches his good buddy Perry and asks him to give an appointment to or do some favor for some Islamic supremacist? Will Perry then turn against his old friend? I hope so. But if we don't call out Perry on his ties to Norquist now, how can we be sure of that?

Read it all.

| 131 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Malaysia's political landscape is dominated by various Muslim or Muslim-led parties, of varying piousness and Islamic fervor. There is only one major non Muslim political party in Malaysia, a leftist party called DAP (Democratic Action Party) which is majority Chinese-Malaysian. The top dog of the Malaysian political realm has long been UMNO (United Malays National Organisation), a Muslim Malay party which has long stood for continued Malay (and hence Islamic) supremacy. Anyone who might threaten this arrangement is targeted for UMNO's harassment and intimidation. And when this fails, more direct measures are commonly employed.  There's a reason why an oft-told joke here in Malaysia has UMNO meaning "U must not oppose". From "Guan Eng says Umno attacks sparked arson attempts", by Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider, August 18, 2011 (H/T Fatimah):

PUTRAJAYA, Aug 18 — Lim Guan Eng [chief minister of the Malaysian state of Penang, roughly analogous to a U.S. state governor] appeared today to blame Umno for escalating religious tension that led to this morning’s arson attempt on the DAP’s Penang headquarters, and demanded “forceful” action from the police against the perpetrators.

“We felt that this was one of those attacks by Umno on the recital of the Quran issue,” he told reporters today when met at the sidelines of the National Finance Council meeting here.

Lim was referring to the controversial edict by the Penang Fatwa Council banning the use of loudspeakers for reciting verses from the Quran before dawn prayers.

The ban had caused a furore among the Muslim community in Penang and earned much criticism in the Umno-controlled media with political leaders claiming this as evidence that the DAP-led state government was impinging on the rights of Muslims.

Early this morning, the DAP’s Penang headquarters in Jalan Talipon was discovered partly charred after an unknown man was purportedly seen leaving a stack of burning newspapers in front of its premises.

Perhaps someone in Malaysia heeded recent calls to make war on 'unbelievers' seriously?

DAP leaders have linked the attack to the ban, saying this is the second incident since the controversy hit the headlines. The first attack occurred four days ago when red paint was splashed at the same premises and at DAP assemblyman Ng Wei Aik’s office.

The Penang chief minister however continued to insist today that the ban had not been made by the state government but by Penang Mufti Datuk Seri Hassan Ahmad, who had himself made the same admission.

“The mufti had already clarified that we weren’t involved, it was decided by the fatwa committee without any instruction or interference by the state government,” he said.

Calling the attack “irresponsible and barbaric”, Lim also expressed fear that allowing the arson culprits to go scot-free would encourage more violence in the future.

“It is a dangerous escalation towards violence and if left unchecked, this will make a functioning democracy not a contest of ideas and principles but a contest of violence.

“I hope the police can act forcefully to nab those responsible. Act without fear or favour,” he said.

Acting without favour?  Fat chance of that happening. The vast majority of the police in Malaysia are Muslim, and they will not act in favour of the 'infidels'.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Putting on full display the puppet state they have become, in the hands of Hizballah and its Syrian and Iranian backers. "Lebanon prevents UN condemnation of terror attack," by Yitzhak Benhorin for YNet News, August 20:

WASHINGTON – Murder of Israelis permitted? Lebanon, which is currently a member of the United Nations Security Council, prevented early Saturday a condemnation of the recent terror offensive in southern Israel.
Israel’s UN Ambassador Ron Prosor expressed his disappointment with Beirut’s move, noting that Lebanon is itself “a state controlled by a terrorist organization.”
The UN envoy said that the latest fiasco proved that the UN has become “blind and deaf” when it comes to condemning terror attacks against Israeli citizens.

"Deaf, dumb, and blind," if you will.

“The Security Council’s silence is deafening,” Prosor said.
Lebanon demands 'balance'
A draft proposal for a presidential statement was distributed to the Security Council’s 15 members Thursday. The United States, Europe and India vigorously supported a harsh UN denunciation of the murderous attack in Israel, yet the Arab representative in the Council, Lebanon, announced Friday that it will endorse such censure only if it is “balanced” with a condemnation of Israel’s retaliatory strikes in the Gaza Strip.
Europe, the US and Israel rejected the Lebanese equation, in essence burying the condemnation and demonstrating yet again that the UN is unable to address some of the most vital issues on its agenda.
Referring to the UN failure to condemn the terror offensive, Ambassador Prosor said that “we are dealing with a blatantly clear terror attack against innocent Israeli civilians.”
“The UN secretary general condemned it, the Americans condemned it, the European Union condemned it, yet the bottom line is that the Security Council again failed as a body,” he said. “Every time an issue pertains to Israel, we see deafening silence. They become blind and deaf.”

And you knew this was coming:

'Israel commits war crimes'
While the UN refrained from condemning Thursday’s string of terror attacks in Israel, which left eight people dead, Palestinian spokesmen were quick to issue scathing condemnations of Israel’s retaliatory operations in the Gaza Strip.
On Friday, Senior Fatah official Nabil Shaath accused Israel of committing war crimes in the Strip and seeking to escalate regional tensions....

Who fired the first shot on Thursday, Ernie and Bert?

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One of the judges ordered Lebanon to hand over information about the other attacks. With the current Lebanese government dominated by Hizballah, good luck with that. An update on this story. "Lebanon tribunal orders probe of 3 more attacks," from the Jerusalem Post, August 19:

AMSTERDAM - The UN-backed Lebanon tribunal said on Friday it pursue investigations into three bomb attacks which it believes are connected to a separate bombing which killed Lebanese politician Rafik al-Hariri in 2005.
Daniel Fransen, the pre-trial judge for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), ordered the Lebanese authorities to hand over information about the attacks and assassination attempts on three other politicians -- Marwan Hamadeh, George Hawi, and Elias al-Murr.
Hamadeh is a former telecoms minister who survived an assassination attempt in 2004 while al-Murr, a former deputy prime minister and former defence minister, was wounded in a bombing in 2005.
Hawi, a former Communist Party chief and critic of Syria, was killed by a bomb in his car in Beirut in 2005.
"The (STL) prosecutor had presented prima facie evidence that each of the three cases are connected (to the Hariri killing), and are thus within the tribunal's jurisdiction," the court said in a statement.
The tribunal issued sealed arrest warrants for four members of the Shi'ite Muslim group Hezbollah in June over the assassination of Hariri, a billionaire Sunni Muslim politician and one time prime minister.
However, none of the four has been detained by Lebanese authorities and Hezbollah, which is backed by Iran and Syria, says they will never be arrested.
| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Look for a proliferation of "Islamic" street names in Bogor. This is not the first time the mayor there, Diani Budiarto, has taken the lead in persecuting the Christians in his city. Hizzoner has long worked to force the Christian congregation in the story below from a building they legally obtained, and they were hounded even as they tried to worship at the side of the road. The same congregation also found itself singing "Silent Night" over the screams of protesters shouting "Allahu akbar" at Christmas.

All of this goes to show it's quite the Sharia paradise Budiarto is building in Bogor. At some point, however, the monster he is creating will turn even on him as an insufficiently "Islamic" mayor, when the Islamic supremacists find someone they like better. "Churches Can’t Be Built in Streets with Islamic Names: Bogor Mayor," by Camelia Pasandaran for the Jakarta Globe, August 19 (thanks to Twostellas):

Bogor’s controversial mayor says he has a new reason not to allow the GKI Yasmin church to open — the name of the street on which it is built has an Islamic name.
Home Affairs Minister Gamawan Fauzi said Bogor Mayor Diani Budiarto — who continues to defy rulings from the Supreme Court and Ombudsman Commission to open the church — had told him that a church should not be built on a street with an Islamic name.
“[Diani] said that it is a fact that the street is named after a noted Islamic Ulama,” Gamawan said at the Vice Presidential Palace on Friday.
GKI Yasmin is located on Jalan Abdullah bin Nuh, an Islamic leader from Cianjur in West Java.
Local cleric Muhammad Mustofa, whose father is the street’s namesake, has previously stated that he has no objection to the church.
Mustofa, who said that Islam was a religion that promoted peace, said differences between religions were not new and similar problems had occurred since the time of Prophet Mohammad.
“Mecca is an example of pluralism during the prophet’s time. Every problem has its solution and hopefully the problem [surrounding the church] will be settled immediately,” he said.

Yes, Mecca was once very diverse. Nowadays, non-Muslims are forbidden to enter, and those who wander into Muslim-only areas even accidentally risk death.

Gamawan also indicated on Friday that he was siding with Diani in the dispute with the church.
“This is the political reality in the field and it could cause disturbances to security and peace,” Gamawan said. “It would not be healthy in the long run, even for the congregation members themselves. [Diani] told me that he has offered an alternative location with the same [dimensions].”
Gamawan said he would summon Diani next week to discuss possible solutions to the conflict.
“We need to mediate ... but we also need to maintain security and peace,” Gamawan said.
Church spokesman Bona Sigalingging said Diani’s reasoning was unacceptable given that a number of churches were built on streets with Islamic names and mosques were built on streets with Christian names.
Bona said the church would refuse to accept any offer of alternative premises.
“The problem is it against the law, against the court ruling and against the recommendation of Ombudsman. It also breaches legal certainty.”
Ombudsman Commission chairman Danang Girindrawardana told the Jakarta Globe on Friday that the street name issue was a “made-up excuse.”
He said the Ombudsman’s recommendation was legally binding, with the Regional Representative Council (DPRD) and Home Affairs minister having the power to enforce sanctions.
He said he hoped the Home Affairs Ministry would uphold the law and impose serious sanctions.
Diani is supported by a coalition of political parties that includes the Golkar Party, Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) and Prosperous Justice Party (PKS).

Well, they can't call it the "Jihad Causes Poverty" Party.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Arifa Alfred got away, and is now telling the world of her ordeal. May all who remain captives, including Farah Hatim, and Saba and Anila Masih, find their way to freedom as well, to the frustration and shame of their captors. "Pakistan: Christian kidnapped, tortured for 2 years; false conversion to Islam," from Catholic Culture, August 19 (thanks to Twostellas):

A Pakistani Christian woman who was abducted in 2009 has escaped from her captor.
After Arifa Alfred, 27, was drugged and kidnapped in central Pakistan, she awoke and was shown papers stating that she had converted to Islam and married her captor. After two years of torture, she escaped on August 1.

Many other such cases involving Christian and Hindu girls in Pakistan continue to go unreported, as the Bishop of Islamabad has warned the kidnappings have become a common practice.

“I am a Christian and have always remained steadfast in my Christian faith and continued to pray to Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary in my heart for liberation during these two years of imprisonment,” she said.
Following her escape, Alfred brought the matter to the attention of police. The police inspector praised her for converting to Islam and has not pursued the case. Alfred and her family now fear for their lives.

Along with the problem of complicit police and undoubtedly enraged captors, Alfred is now officially an apostate from Islam, which carries the death penalty under Sharia according to Muhammad's own command.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As we have noted before, al-Shabaab has seen in the Somali famine an opportunity to starve its enemies and erode the general population's will to resist. Christians are all the more a target of the group's macabre calculations in its attempt to control the flow of aid, in a famine whose existence it officially continues to deny. "Christian Genocide in Somalia," by Frank Crimi for Frontpage Magazine, August 19:

The Islamist terrorist group al Shabab is intentionally starving Somali Christians in territory it controls. It's just the latest incident in the terror group's systematic efforts to eradicate all of Somalia's Christians.
According to the International Christian Concern (ICC), al Shabab's intentional denial of humanitarian aid has resulted in the deliberate starvation of 18 Christians in the Somali cities of Afgoye, Baidawa, and Kismayo. As ICC spokesman Jonathan Racho said, "Any Somali that is suspected of being a Christian, or a friend of a Christian, does not receive any food aid."
Unfortunately, the ongoing and purposeful elimination of the small Somali Christian community at the hands of al Shabab has gone largely unrecognized and unreported, eclipsed by the other horrors of rape, torture and murder perpetrated upon most of Somalia's Muslim population by the Islamist terrorist group.
It goes without saying that al Shabab's brutality has been well documented, most recently in a report issued by Human Rights Watch, which found the terror group continuing to carry out public beheadings and floggings; forced recruitment of children into its forces; and the denial of humanitarian assistance to the 2.2 million starving Somalis in al Shabab-controlled territory.
So, it shouldn't surprise that al Shabab, which has openly professed its intention to rid Somalia of a Christian presence, is focusing its particular brand of barbarity on Somali Christians. After all, this is the same group that in August 2010 banned three Christian Aid Groups that it stated were "acting as missionaries under the guise of humanitarian work" while at the same time spreading what they termed as "corrupted ideologies in order to taint the pure creed of the Muslims in Somalia."
Of course, it should be noted that the persecution of Christian Somalis pre-dates the rise of al Shabab. That assault arose from the outset of Somalia's 1991 civil war and has gone unabated ever since. During that time it is estimated that over a thousand Somali Christian adults have been killed in this overwhelmingly Muslim country, with thousands of others forced to either flee Somalia or deny their faith to save their lives....

There is more.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 19, 2011

It was a one-way truce anyway, as Hamas and other jihadist groups continued to lob rockets into Israel all the while. The world never expected or demanded Hamas to act like a real government, while demanding a level of restraint from Israel that would allow virtually no response to the jihadist faux-state in Gaza but inaction.

Under Islamic law, a hudna is never intended to last, and its purpose is to allow the Muslim side to regroup and re-arm until they think they are in a position to succeed when hostilities resume. Hamas has spent its time doing just that, stockpiling all the weapons and explosives it could -- all the more so since the Egyptian revolution.

Israeli intelligence estimates that "Hamas and Islamic Jihad have obtained more than 10,000 rockets and missiles – including a large stockpile of Iranian Fajr-5 rockets that can reach Tel Aviv." Longer-range rockets can be stored farther from the Israeli border, so that "in order to effectively stop rocket fire into Beersheba, Ashdod, Ashkelon and Tel Aviv, the IDF will have to operate throughout the entire Strip." Hamas' propaganda machine will be standing by to peddle its wares to international news outlets, of course.

Eventually, however, Hamas will bite off more than it can chew in the current round of the conflict as well, and plead again to return to the ceasefire to repeat the process, just as it did in March, after the Israeli response when one of Hamas' more advanced rockets struck a school bus.

One question remains: will the Hamas fighters cut and run as badly this time, or fire poorly while paralyzed with fear? "Hamas calls off truce as rocket fire continues from Gaza," from the Jerusalem Post, August 20:

Hamas announced early on Saturday they were no longer committed to a more than two-year de facto truce with Israel since the end of a war in early 2009.

They may also suppose that a renewed conflict may give them the chance to angle for sympathy at the U.N. ahead of the statehood spectacle looming in the coming weeks.

The statement was broadcast over a Hamas radio station in Gaza after Israel pounded the Strip for two days with air strikes in response to rocket salvoes and attacks on Thursday that killed eight people.
"There is no longer any truce with the enemy," the statement said in a move seen as paving the way for Hamas to escalate the violence with Israel.
The IAF launched an airstrike late Friday night against a terrorist cell in the central Gaza Strip after the cell fired a rocket into Israeli territory, the IDF Spokesman's Office said in a statement. A direct hit was identified in the strike, the statement added.
Minutes earlier, the Iron Dome rocket defense system intercepted a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip toward Ashkelon.
Earlier, three rockets exploded in the Eshkol Regional council Friday night over a period of several hours. No injuries or damages were reported.
In the Sha'ar Hanegev Regional Council, an explosion occurred near a local kibbutz Friday evening. Local officials said a Kassam rocket landed in an open area. No injuries or damages were reported.
An hour earlier, two rockets fired from Gaza fell in northern Lachish not far from Kiryat Malachi. No injuries were reported although the explosion sparked a fire, which spread to an empty building. The building was lightly damaged before firefighters put out the fire.
Police have asked members of the public in the affected areas to follow instructions from the home front command. [...]
"If anyone thinks the State of Israel will resign itself to this, they are wrong," Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said in a brief television address about the most deadly attack in Israel since 2008.
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jawad Rasul.jpg

A few days ago I received the Tweet above from a certain Jawad Rasul. It said:

Thank You @pamelageller and @jihadwatchRS, If you have any humanity, you might ponder over this! nyp.st/phBJuX via @newyorkpost

I had no idea what the heck he was talking about. The link went to a story about a murder in New Jersey. It all comes clear here: "Police: Accused man claimed bias in wife's killing," from the Associated Press, August 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

BOONTON, N.J. – A Pakistani-American man whose wife was gunned down while they and their son walked along a quiet suburban street plotted the killing with another woman and told police his family had been attacked by a group of men who called them terrorists, authorities said Friday.

Kashif Parvaiz, 26, suffered non-life-threatening wounds in the shooting that killed his 27-year-old wife, Nazish Noorani. They were walking with their 3-year-old son to a relative's house in Boonton when shots rang out Tuesday night. The boy was unharmed.

Parvaiz and 26-year-old Antionette Stephen, of Billerica, Mass., both face charges of murder, conspiracy and weapons offenses. He also faces child-endangerment charges. [...]

According to Morris County Prosecutor Robert Bianchi, Parvaiz's accounts of the attack were inconsistent and immediately raised suspicions.

Parvaiz had told investigators the couple was attacked by a different combination of black and white males who shouted ethnic slurs, authorities said. In his initial story, the group shouted something about the family being "terrorists," authorities said.

Bianchi said investigators were deeply concerned when Parvaiz suggested it was a bias crime, but within hours "it was obvious to investigators that this was sadly the alleged handy work [sic] of the victim's husband who allegedly did the unthinkable and plotted to murder his wife."...

Islamic supremacists never miss a chance to position Muslims as victims so as to deflect attention away from jihad terror and try to place Islam and the Muslim community beyond reasonable scrutiny. And so even as Kashif Pervaiz was starting to equivocate and spin ever-taller tales, and even though this murder has nothing to do with Islam or jihad, the blame game began. Not only did I receive Jawad Rasul's Tweet, but also a well-placed source told me that Ibrahim Hooper, Honest Ibe himself, of Hamas-linked CAIR was “salivating and waiting to jump all over” the Noorani murder story. “They are waiting to blame you for everything.”

I wasn’t anywhere near Boonton, New Jersey last Tuesday, so why would Rasul and CAIR want to blame me for this love triangle murder? Because in CAIR’s world, as I noted here, my work exposing the activities of Islamic jihadists and the ways in which they use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism constitutes “hate” and “incitement to violence.” They think they found confirmation of this in the Breivik murders. Another problem with this idea is that Breivik, in all his citations of my work, never cites me as calling for or justifying violence in any way. He cited me, apparently, to point out a problem. The problem -- the threats to freedom posed by Islamic jihadists and supremacists -- doesn't go away because he is a murderer. If all ideas are discredited because someone acts violently because of them, then all Leftist mainstream media organs should close up shop. After all, the Left in power has murdered millions for socialism and other widely held ideas today.

But don't expect consistency of thought from those blaming the counter-jihadists for the Norway murders. Their arguments fall apart on the slightest scrutiny. Their object is not ultimately to convince anyone. Their object is to demonize us and thereby shut us up, so that the jihad can proceed unchallenged.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In the world of the pro-Sharia Muslim Brotherhood front known as the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), my work exposing the activities of Islamic jihadists and the ways in which they use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism constitutes “hate” and “incitement to violence.” They think they found confirmation of this in the murder spree of Norwegian psychopath Anders Breivik, since he cited me (along with John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Charles Darwin, Barack Obama, the New York Times, and a host of others) in his lengthy and ideologically incoherent “manifesto.”

"ICNA Condemns Terrorist Attacks in Norway," from ICNA, July 24 (thanks to Answering Muslims):

The perpetrator of these attacks was a racist, hateful fascist with a 1500-page manifesto and deliberate plan. He was both xenophobic and Islamophobic and was in contact with numerous European and American anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim personalities. We are horrified that such violence was borne from these views.

The rise of Islamophobia fostered by individuals such as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller has threatened our communities and prompted such acts of violence. ICNA calls upon the international community and the Obama administration to take action against hate groups and so-called ‘experts on Islam’ who promote this kind of bigotry.

In reality, the idea that any of the counter-jihad activists and writers who the mainstream media and Islamic supremacists have blamed for the Norway attacks is actually responsible for them is absurd, and not just because we have never called for or justified violence. When two people or groups share a belief or perspective, and one of them starts killing, the other is in no way responsible. Otherwise Martin Luther King would be responsible for the Watts riots – and CAIR and ICNA for Islamic jihad terror.

Indeed, it is ironic that the Islamic supremacist groups that are trying to shut down the counter-jihad movement by claiming that our views lead to violence at the same time hotly deny that there is any connection between Islamic teachings and jihad violence – even though Islamic jihadists routinely point to those teachings as their motivation.

The ICNA Islamic supremacist blame game is part of a larger initiative. The 57-government Organization of Islamic Cooperation has been working for years to compel the governments of the U.S. and Europe to criminalize all critical discussion of Islam, thereby rendering them unable to investigate the motives and goals of jihad terrorists, and thus mute and defenseless against the advancing jihad. A key component of this effort in the U.S. today is to demonize and marginalize all the voices speaking out for the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people – all denied by Islamic law.

This blame game is a threat to the freedom of every American.

And remember: the Muslim Brotherhood, of which ICNA is an arm, is dedicated in its own words to "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house."

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's not exactly what they meant by "cultural exchange," though the study in contrasts is striking. This attack is also yet another coordinated assault on a high-profile target in the capital; once again, jihad causes material and intellectual poverty: no one will invest if they conclude they are only building new targets. And the obstacles to "academic and cultural exchange" in an atmosphere of random acts of jihadist terror are obvious. "Explosions rock British Council in Afghan capital," by David Ariosto for CNN, August 19:

Kabul, Afghanistan (CNN) -- Explosions and heavy automatic gunfire were heard hours after five well-armed suicide bombers attacked the British Council in the Afghan capital on Friday, leaving at least eight people dead, officials said.
White smoke billowed from a building in the compound while heavily-armed British and Afghan forces cordoned off the area in the center of the capital, establishing a security perimeter around the buildings.
The attacks occurred inside a well-guarded Kabul neighborhood, leaving at least another 10 people wounded, the Afghan Interior Ministry said.
The British Council is a British government-affiliated body that fosters cultural and academic exchanges in Afghanistan.
The strike, which the Taliban has claimed responsibility for, also coincides with the 92nd anniversary of Afghan independence from Great Britain.
In the first attack, a militant drove a vehicle packed with explosives toward the council's main security gate before detonating the device, according to Afghan police spokesman Hashamap Stanikzai.
The second man then attempted to enter the compound wearing a vest filled with explosives. He also detonated himself, Stanikzai said.
Police say two militants were killed in a firefight with security forces. The other three detonated their explosives.
Gunfire could be heard throughout the incident and military helicopters circled overhead.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the attack, as did the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.
"Initial reports indicate a combination of multiple vehicle-borne and personal-borne (improvised explosive devices) were detonated," a statement from the NATO-led force said.
NATO commander Gen. John Allen pledged to hold "the perpetrators accountable for their actions."
Meanwhile, an embassy spokesman said British government personnel are coordinating with Afghan authorities to secure the area.
The strike occurred not far from the Intercontinental Hotel, the scene of another insurgent attack in June against a high-profile western target.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Still more Islamophobia. Oh, when will it end? "Pakistani man tied to Times Square bomber pleads guilty," by Basil Katz for Reuters, August 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Pakistani immigrant pleaded guilty on Thursday in federal court to running an illegal money-transfer business that provided $7,000 to the man who tried to bomb New York's Times Square.

Mohammad Younis, 45, was charged in September, five months after Faisal Shahzad was arrested for parking a crude car bomb in the crowded Times Square on May 1, 2010. A bomb squad ultimately defused the device.

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan said in the indictment that Younis met with Shahzad on April 10 last year and gave him the money sent by people in Pakistan as part of an informal "hawala" money transaction common in Islamic societies.

On Thursday, Younis pleaded guilty in Manhattan federal court to one count of conducting an unlicensed money transfer business. But Shahzad's name was not mentioned in court.

Younis told U.S. District Judge John Keenan that he did not know who he gave the money to or what the money was intended for. Prosecutors have not charged Younis with participating in or having any knowledge of Shahzad's planned attack....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Meditations for a Time of Crisis" indeed. "The greatest memorial to those who died 10 years ago will be a world more inclined toward peace." Indeed, indeed. I don't see how such a world can be brought about without understanding why 9/11 happened. As long as they're having Qur'an readings in Newark, I suggest these as meditations on why they're having any special ceremonies on September 11 in the first place:

Qur'an 98:4-6: "Nor did the People of the Book make schisms, until after there came to them Clear Evidence. And they have been commanded no more than this: To worship Allah, offering Him sincere devotion, being true (in faith); to establish regular prayer; and to practise regular charity; and that is the Religion Right and Straight. Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures."

Qur'an 5:14: "From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done."

Qur'an 4:171: "O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and His word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers, and say not "Three" - Cease! (it is) better for you! - Allah is only One Allah. Far is it removed from His Transcendent Majesty that He should have a son. His is all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is sufficient as Defender."

Qur'an 4:157: "And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain."

Qur'an 5:116: "And when Allah saith: O Jesus, son of Mary! Didst thou say unto mankind: Take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah? he saith: Be glorified! It was not mine to utter that to which I had no right. If I used to say it, then Thou knewest it. Thou knowest what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Thy Mind. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower of Things Hidden?"

Qur'an 19:35: "It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! when He determines a matter, He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is."

Qur'an 9:30-31: "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they! They have taken as lords beside Allah their rabbis and their monks and the Messiah son of Mary, when they were bidden to worship only One Allah. There is no Allah save Him. Be He Glorified from all that they ascribe as partner (unto Him)!"

Qur'an 9:29: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

"Episcopal Church to mark 10th anniversary of 9/11 terrorist attacks," by Matthew Davies for the Episcopal News Service, August 18:

Episcopal Church and other religious leaders are planning interfaith events to mark the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks when almost 3,000 people perished after hijacked planes slammed into the World Trade Center in New York City, the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The Executive Council, at its June meeting, invited all Episcopal communities "to open the doors of their institutions" during the Sept. 10-11 weekend to commemorate the anniversary "with acts of prayer and remembrance, service, creativity, interfaith cooperation, education, community building, and fellowship, offering our institutions as active, accessible sites of healing for our local communities."

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said in an Aug. 18 statement that the anniversary is "an opportunity for reflection," adding that the Episcopal Church "continues to work for healing and reconciliation."

"The greatest memorial to those who died 10 years ago will be a world more inclined toward peace," said Jefferts Schori, who will preach at 7:30 a.m. on Sunday, Sept. 11, at St. Paul's Chapel in New York, a few meters from where the World Trade Center stood, and at 11 a.m. at the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine.

Acknowledging that "many people died senselessly that day, and [that] many still grieve their loss," the presiding bishop said, "We believe there is hope." [...]

Washington National Cathedral has announced a three-day commemoration, titled "A Call to Compassion," in collaboration with the Pentagon Memorial Fund, the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, and the Flight 93 National Memorial. The three days will culminate on Sept. 11, when the cathedral will toll its 12-ton funeral bell at the moments when airplanes struck the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, hit the Pentagon, and crashed in Pennsylvania. [...]

Also on Sept. 11, the cathedral will hold an interfaith prayer vigil from 8:30 to 10 a.m., when participants of diverse faiths can pray together and mark the moments when the airplanes struck. The vigil will be attended by Cathedral Dean Samuel T. Lloyd III; Bishop of Washington John Bryson Chane; Rabbi Bruce Lustig, Washington Hebrew Congregation; Jetsün Khandro Rinpoche of Tibet, Buddhist nun and incarnate lama; D.C. Rao, a Hindu priest serving on the board of directors of the Inter Faith Conference; Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the [Hamas-linked] Islamic Society of North America; and musician Hamayan Kahn.

A forum on compassion from 10:15 to 11 a.m. will include author Karen Armstrong and Cathedral Dean Lloyd leading a conversation on what people of faith share in common. [...]

In the Diocese of Newark, Bishop Mark Beckwith will be joined by Rabbi Matthew D. Gewirtz of Temple B'Nai Jeshurun in Short Hills and Imam W. Deen Shareef of Masjid Waarith ud Deen in Irvington to lead an interfaith service, titled "Compassion in Action," at 3 p.m. on Sept. 11 at Trinity & St. Philip's Cathedral in Newark.

The service will blend scripture and reflections based on the Old and New Testaments and the Qur'an, music from the Jewish and Christian traditions and the Al-Adhaan, the Islamic call to worship. [...]

Meanwhile, liturgical resources to help congregations commemorate the anniversary are been offered from several sources. The Diocese of Long Island has published suggested collects, readings and hymns here, while Forward Movement has set up a webpage of resources here, including “Meditations for a Time of Crisis,” a special issue of Forward Day by Day that was written in the days immediately following 9/11. [...]

The National Council of Churches also has prepared worship resources for churches, including a liturgy and a new hymn for use in 9/11 services of remembrance.

"For Christians in the U.S. and around the world, this 10th anniversary will be a time of prayer and remembrance for those who were lost, as well as a time for each of us to seek to discern God's will for ending the hatred and resentments that spawned the violence," said the Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, NCC general secretary....

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Isn't hacking into and destroying websites illegal? Shouldn't Nouf Rashid be arrested and prosecuted? Or do we simply not care anymore to defend the freedom of speech when it comes to Muslims waging jihad against anything they perceive as remotely critical of Islam?

"Woman disables anti-Islam websites," from Arab News, August 18 (thanks to Twostellas):

DAMMAM: An Alkhobar woman studying in the United States is taking credit for destroying 23 Danish websites that denigrated the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), Al-Madinah newspaper reported on Thursday.

Nouf Rashid told the Arabic newspaper she was hacking into Danish websites having references to cartoons of the Prophet along with other sites that had questionable content in her view.

She said she had also destroyed a number of pornographic sites and hacked into the computer systems of young men who had tried to blackmail girls by threatening to publish their private photos. She gained expertise in the field out of a desire to learn new things in the IT field.

Nouf said she entered the hacking world to save a girl who was being blackmailed by a young man who wanted to marry her and had obtained a private photo of her. The victim’s friend had requested Nouf to look for a hacker in the US to save her from the man.

“In fact, I contacted some of my hacker friends at university and I learned from them the art of hacking,” she said.

“After this, I took the opportunity to save many women from youths who tried to blackmail them using their pictures. By the grace of God I was able to hack into their systems and erase most of their photos.”

Nouf said she had hacked into some of the Danish websites that denigrated the Prophet and shut them down. “I also sent messages and articles about Islam and the Prophet to those who managed those sites,” she pointed out....

According to Western media sources, more than 900 Danish websites have been hacked by groups in many countries along with individual hackers recently.

The BBC reported that the attacks typically replace home pages with pro-Islam messages and condemn the publication of the blasphemous images of the Prophet.

“We have never seen so many defacements that are politically targeted in such a short time,” Roberto Preatoni of the Internet monitoring group Zone H told BBC. He noted that most of the interference involves defacement of the website although some of the hackers have threatened the Danish people with revenge....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
We've long noted here at Jihad Watch the propensity for Muslims to increase jihad attacks, not to mention murder and mayhem in general, during the 'holy' month of Ramadan, AKA 'Bombadan'. So when it's a Friday, during Ramadan, and you're in a mosque in Pakistan Muslim-occupied India, the chances of being struck by a mujahid -- not a right-wing Christian, not an 'Islamophobe' -- approach 100%. "At least 30 killed as suicide attacker hits Pakistan mosque", MSNBC, 19 August 2011:
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — At least 30 people were killed and scores of others wounded Friday in a suicide bombing at a mosque in northwest Pakistan, a senior government official told NBC News.

The official told NBC that a teenage attacker blew himself up inside the main hall of the mosque moments after worshippers [sic] had finished their prayers.

The Associated Press, citing a local government official, reported that the death toll could be as high as 40.

Some 300 people were at the mosque for Friday prayers during the holy month of Ramadan when the bomb exploded in Ghundi village of Khyber tribal region.
Hotbed of Islamist activity

Pakistan's tribal belt is a hotbed of Islamist militant activity, as well as sectarian rivalry.

Khyber also is a key region for the U.S. and NATO, because a large portion of non-lethal supplies heading to U.S. forces in Afghanistan must cross through the region.

The attack came following a period of relative calm in the country, which has suffered numerous Taliban and other attacks in recent years.

No group claimed responsibility for the bombing, but the Taliban and other insurgents have attacked scores of targets in the area, which lies along the Afghan border.
A bombed out mosque and yet another pile of bodies. This is what passes for normal in many lands cursed by the votaries of Islam and those who follow Islam. The fact that this attack will almost certainly be little remarked upon, let alone condemned, by few if any Muslims outside of the immediate vicinity of the shattered mosque, should be considered as yet another damning indictment of the so-called "Religion of Peace".
| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pakistan urgently wants Shahbaz Bhatti to be forgotten, along with the injustices he fought against. Speaking of his murder carries the risk of bringing up the blasphemy law, and criticism of it, for which Bhatti and others have died or incurred death fatwas.

Authorities have been busily sweeping his case under the rug, blaming "internal squabbles" among Christians, and then "a property dispute among relatives," revising the official account in a story which the local bishop said changes virtually every day.

Ultimately, they want him erased. The political establishment finds it too much of a liability to have him remembered as a martyr, and for having died unjustly for a just cause. And so to protect themselves, they have to kill him twice by rewriting the circumstances of his death. "Islamabad: no civil award for “martyr” Shahbaz Bhatti," by Jibran Khan for Asia News, August 18:

Islamabad (AsiaNews) – For the Pakistani government, “martyr” Shahbaz Bhatti, who was murdered on 2 March by Muslim fundamentalists, does not deserve an official civil award. The name of the Catholic minister in fact is not on the list of 185 government officials issued by President Asif Ali Zardari on Tuesday. The award ceremony is scheduled for 23 March 2012.
Punjab Governor Salman Taseer will be among the people honoured that day. He too was slain, in January, for his opposition to the blasphemy rules and for his defence of Asia Bibi, a Catholic mother of five, who was sentenced to death on the basis of rules also known as the ‘black law’. But unlike Bhatti, Taseer was Muslim. Thus, in Pakistan, even after death religious minorities do not have the same rights as the followers of Islam.
The government’s decision to exclude the Catholic minister from its list has been met by criticism within Pakistan’s Christian community and civil society leaders.
Shahbaz Bhatti and Sherry Rehman, a lawmaker who had suggest changes to the blasphemy law, put their lives on the line to defend the country’s minorities, change unfair laws and protect those, like Asia Bibi, who are in danger.
For Mgr Rufin Anthony, bishop of Islamabad/Rawalpindi, “it is surprising that just a few days ago, on Minorities Day, the president stressed the principle of equal rights and highlighted the role minorities played in the growth of Pakistan. Today, when it was time to honour an individual who fought for minority rights” and “gave his life for the cause, he ignored Shahbaz Bhatti.”
The government’s action was “unworthy”, the prelate said. In his view, the authorities should “include Bhatti and Rehman in the list.”
Meanwhile, Pervez Rafique, a member of the Punjab provincial assembly, called for a change to the preamble of the Pakistani constitution to ensure the full implementation of the ideals laid down by Ali Jinnah, the founder of the nation, in his famous address to the country’s constituent assembly in which he insisted on the principles of “equality of rights” for non-Muslims and religious freedom in a secular state (Pakistan is today an Islamic Republic)

Pakistan named itself the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in its first post-colonial constitution of 1956, reiterating its Islamic character more strongly in the constitution of 1973. Well before its founding, however, its identity has always depended on Islam. The presence and enforcement of Sharia has only become more severe over the years, as with the Hudud ordinances that came into force in 1979.

That is only natural. The moment a territory declares itself "Islamic," it takes on an inherent instability: Sharia encompasses all areas of life, public and private, and does not lend itself to compartmentalization by those who believe it to be Allah's own law. The fundamental aim of jihad is to impose Islamic law, and someone will always want more Sharia -- itself an inherently defective system of laws whose contents are abusive of human rights -- and be willing to kill for it. Even in the absence of violence, political credibility depends on Islamic piety, and there is thus a built-in gravitational pull toward more Sharia.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And now, the BIFF vs. MILF update you were waiting for.

This report says the jihadists are fighting for "an independent Muslim homeland that would liberate minority Muslims from crushing poverty and neglect." Therein lies an assumption that the cause of poverty in the area is a one-way street, and that poverty is the underlying cause for the jihad, downplaying the role of ideology.

We have seen case after case where jihad causes poverty, and frequently kicks vulnerable populations and economies while they are down.

There can be no stable society, and therefore, no prosperous society, when violence is so easily provoked in the name of honor, or for the imposition of Islamic law. There can be no lasting, sustainable investment and development when there is the constant risk of seeing those investments destroyed. The conditions to create wealth do not exist where there is perpetual insecurity, as jihad creates, blackmailing a population to give up liberty for security. Nor do they exist where there is not freedom of conscience and inquiry (and access to education outside the madrassa for girls as well as boys), or where the fear of being killed for ideological crimes keeps people quiet and thinking inside the (pine) box.

After decades of a jihadist insurgency, the situation is nowhere near as simple as the report describes. "Philippine guerrilla forms new Muslim rebel group," by Jim Gomez for the Associated Press, August 18:

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — A renegade commander said Thursday he has split from the Philippines' largest Muslim rebel group and formed a new group with hundreds of fighters to wage a war for a separate homeland.
Ameril Umbra Kato told The Associated Press in a cellphone interview from his jungle hide-out in southern Maguindanao province that he would not return to the main Moro Islamic Liberation Front, which has threatened to expel him after he led a mutiny in December.
Kato denied allegations by Philippine security officials that he has links with al-Qaida-linked militants in the country's volatile south and was involved in deadly bombings and terrorist attacks.
He said his new group would be known as the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Front. Its guerrilla wing, the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters, was organized in January, a month after he broke off from the main Muslim guerrilla force over differences with insurgent leaders.
"This is the true jihad, the true revolution," Kato said.
Kato, who has about 200 to 300 fighters according to his former comrades, did not give details about his combat force or say what next steps he would take.
Kato, who is in his late 60s, said he left because his former group chose to "waste time" by deciding to negotiate with the government for expanded autonomy instead of waging a battle for an independent Muslim homeland that would liberate minority Muslims from crushing poverty and neglect.
"We've been going around and around wasting money and look where the peace talks have brought us," Kato said. "The roots of the conflict have not been solved."
The infighting within the main 11,000-strong rebel force underscores the complexity of the Muslim unrest that has claimed more than 120,000 lives and stunted growth in the impoverished but resource-rich south of the predominantly Roman Catholic Philippines.
The main guerrilla force currently led by Murad Ebrahim split in 1978 from the former Moro National Liberation Front, which dropped its secessionist bid for autonomy and signed a landmark peace accord with Manila in 1996. Murad's group dropped its bid for independence last year but demanded a more powerful type of autonomy with greater control over wider territory.
Murad's group said Kato, who used to head one of its largest and most battle-tested commands, resigned last December, citing his age and poor health. But Kato then formed a breakaway group and accused Murad's group of betraying the Muslim cause by going for autonomy instead of independence.

Life imitates Monty Python: "Splitter!"

"They did that without consulting the Muslims. They cheated," Kato said.
Philippine officials have expressed concern over the infighting, which they say casts doubts about the main rebel group's ability to enforce any future accord in peace talks brokered by Malaysia.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As the propagation of non-Islamic faiths is forbidden under Islamic law, missionary work is banned. But that won't stop the mullahs from being paranoid about it, and taking the opportunity to remind the unbelievers of their place in the Islamic Republic of Iran. "Iran Seizes 6,500 Bibles to Stop 'Deceiving' Christian Missionaries," by Fionna Agomuoh for the Christian Post, August 17:

Iran has seized 6,500 copies of the Bible in northwest Iran in what appears to be the latest crackdown by Iranian authorities against Christianity in the country.
Few details are known about the seizure, however, Christian news agency, Mohabat News, reports that Dr. Majid Abhari, adviser to the social issues committee of the parliament in Iran stated, "These missionaries with reliance on huge money and propaganda are trying to deviate our youth."
In a government interview with Mehr news agency, Abhari explained that the Bibles were taken because of governmental concerns that Christian missionaries mean to "deceive" young Iranians with "false propaganda."
"The important point in this issue that should be considered by intelligence, judicial and religious agencies is that all religions are strengthening their power to confront Islam, otherwise what does this huge number of Bibles mean?" he told Mehr.
According to persecution advocacy group, Voice of the Martyrs, missionary work is banned in Iran, though Christian conversion has been growing in the majority Islamic country in recent years.
Conversion from Islam to another religion, known as apostasy, is also a crime in Iran, and offenders are often arrested and tried in court. Recent legislation is aiming to have the crime of apostasy punishable by death.

The death penalty for apostasy comes from Muhammad's own orders, and has clearly survived in Shi'ite as well as Sunni traditions.

Mohabat News noted that in another Bible seizing in November 2010, a bus was inspected in the village of Darishk and 300 Bibles were taken and burned.
Several Christian churches in Iran have also been closed in order to discourage conversion. One such church is the Assyrian Pentecostal Church in Tehran that closed in March 2009 after threats from the government.
The Christian Post reported in February 2010 that Evangelical Pastor, Rev. Wilson Issavi was arrested and his church, the Assyrian Evangelical Church in Kermanshah, closed.
Mohabat News commentates that Islamic republic officials have been concerned about Christian conversions despite their own Islamic propaganda against Christianity in recent decades. The fact that conversions continue in the wake of arrest and persecution is also noted.
"Islamic republic considers itself the responsible guide for people's thoughts. So what is their fear of the importation and distribution of non-Islamic religious books?" Mohabat News has reported.

That is exactly their fear. Losing their monopoly on "people's thoughts."

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Other reports have surfaced in recent weeks about potential al-Qaeda inroads into Nigeria, and this story provides further evidence.

This evolutionary path has become a common phenomenon among jihadist groups: you know you've hit the big time when you can link up with the best known brand in jihadist terrorism, al-Qaeda: Just ask al-Shabaab, Abu Sayyaf, or the former Salafist Group for Call and Combat. Of course, the reason such groups in supposedly "local" conflicts far removed from one another can make common cause is that they share the fundamental aim of jihad in all its forms: to impose Islamic law. Think jihad globally, wage jihad locally.

What remains to be seen is whether Boko Haram is too crazed for the more calculating al-Qaeda, and whether rivalries with the already established affiliate, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, would prove counterproductive. "AP Interview: US general sees Nigeria terror link," from the Associated Press, August 17 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A radical Muslim sect responsible for assassinations and bombings across northern Nigeria may be trying to link with two al-Qaida-linked groups in other African countries to mount joint attacks in this oil-rich nation, the commander for U.S. military operations in Africa said Wednesday.
Gen. Carter Ham told The Associated Press that "multiple sources" indicate the Nigerian sect known as Boko Haram made contacts with al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, which operates in northwest Africa, and with al-Shabab in Somalia.
"I think it would be the most dangerous thing to happen not only to the Africans, but to us as well," Carter said.
Ham said there is no specific intelligence suggesting the groups plan attacks against U.S. or Western interests in Nigeria, but the nation is a major supplier of crude oil to the U.S. and is an economic hub drawing foreigners from across the world.
Ham's comments were the strongest official remarks on fears privately held by Western and Nigerian officials. However, it remains unclear what formal links, if any, exist between Boko Haram, al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb and al-Shabab. The three organizations have different ethnic roots and their objectives are not the same, but they are all Islamist militant groups.
Boko Haram, whose name means "Western education is sacrilege" in the local Hausa language, came to prominence in 2009 when sect members attacked local police stations and government buildings throughout northeast Nigeria. The riots and ensuing security crackdown left 700 people dead.
Last year, the group began assassinating clerics and police officers. It also has engineered spectacular attacks, including the June bombing of Nigeria's federal police headquarters, the assassination of a prominent politician and a prison break that freed more than 700 inmates.
Boko Haram seeks the implementation of strict Shariah Islamic law in the country. Nigeria, a nation of 150 million people, is largely split between a Christian south and Muslim north, where 12 states have a version of Shariah in place.
Ham said it appears Boko Haram may be splitting with one section focused on domestic issues and another on violent international extremism.
"What is most worrying at present is, at least in my view, a clearly stated intent by Boko Haram and by al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb to coordinate and synchronize their efforts," the general said. "I'm not so sure they're able to do that just yet, but it's clear to me they have the desire and intent to do that."
Ham said that a "loose" partnership also would include al-Shabab. A suspected al-Shabab bombmaker now facing terrorism charges in New York was at one point detained by secret police in Nigeria. Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, also known as AQIM, has issued statements in support of Boko Haram, and both use similar logos in communiques.
A recent video indicates that two men, a Briton and an Italian who were kidnapped in northwestern Nigeria, are being held by AQIM.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The developments in this case from the U.N. increasingly have an air of "Hi, we're with the United Nations. Remember when we indicted these people for homicide? Anybody?"

Hizballah's parasitic pseudo-state has succeeded for the moment in partially devouring its host. In a Hizballah-dominated government, the political will to challenge a band of thugs who staged "coup drills" when they felt threatened over the pending indictments has been hard to come by. Both Lebanon and the U.N. have passed up chances to challenge Hizballah (or hold it to existing resolutions) before the group became better armed than the Lebanese Army, and entrenched in the Lebanese government. Doing so is certainly not going to get any easier anytime soon.

An update on this story. "Hariri tribunal publishes indictment to try Hezbollah members," by Jan Hennop for Middle East Online, August 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

The UN-backed court probing the 2005 murder of Lebanon's former prime minister Rafiq Hariri said Wednesday it had enough evidence to try four Hezbollah members, as it published the full indictment.
"The pre-trial judge has ordered that his decision confirming the indictment related to the 14 February 2005 attack, as well as the indictment itself, be made public," the Special Tribunal for Lebanon said.
The judge found "the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence on a prima facie basis to proceed to trial," the Hague-based tribunal added in a statement, welcomed by the court's chief prosecutor Daniel A. Bellemare.
Judge Daniel Fransen last month ordered confidentiality around the names and charges against Salim Ayyash, 47, Mustafa Badreddine, 50, Hussein Anaissi, 37 and Assad Sabra, 34, be partially dropped.
Ayyash and Badreddine face charges of "committing a terrorist act by means of an explosive device" and homicide, while Anaissi and Sabra faced charges of conspiring to commit the same acts in the massive bomb blast that killed Hariri and 22 others.
Tribunal prosecutor Bellemare welcomed the tribunal's order to unseal the indictment, saying he will push ahead with preparations for the trial.
"This order will finally inform the public and the victims about the facts alleged in the indictment regarding the commission of the crime that led to charging the four accused," Bellemare said in a separate statement.
More than 20,000 pages of evidence were filed with the indictment which Bellemare's office claimed "corroborates the following factual allegations and charges included in the indictment."
The prosecutor accused Badreddine of "being the overall controller of the attack," said a summary of the indictment.
"Ayyash coordinated the assassination team that was responsible for the physical perpetration of the attack," the summary added.
"Anaissi and Sabra, in addition to being conspirators, prepared and delivered a false claim of responsibility video, which sought to blame the wrong people," it said.

Most recently, Hizballah blames Israel, naturally.

It claimed an assassination team "consisting of Ayyash and others positioned themselves in several locations where they were able to track and observe Hariri's convoy," on February 14, 2005.
It also gives a timeline of Hariri's movements up until 12:55 local time, when a "male suicide bomber detonated a large quantity of explosives concealed in the cargo area of a... van, killing Hariri and 21 other victims and injuring 231."
Apart from Ayyash's role, the prosecution alleged Anaissi and Sabra called two international news agencies shortly after the attack and told them they could find a video tape placed in a Beirut square, with the false information.
The tribunal itself stressed the prosecution's findings "does not imply that the individuals are guilty, but merely establishes that there is enough material for them to be tried."
"The prosecution will have to prove at trial that the accused are guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt," the tribunal said.
| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

August 18, 2011

The poor jihadi dears might get claustrophobia, doncha know. Absurd Britannia Update: "Our prison walls are too high to look over, moan terror suspects," by Jack Doyle in the Daily Mail, August 18 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Suspected terrorists ar