All traces of Perry/Aga Khan curriculum removed from web

There are over 1000 other Independent School Districts, in Texas to search.

Yes, they are independent.

Uh, it's not available in cached form, either. Click on the "here" you provided above - and it ain't there.

I could be wrong. This issue is not going away, especially after we got burned by former President Bush.

Obama's heart is with Islam. We want him removed from office, November 2012. He's been this nation's worst nightmare.

Notwithstanding all the indignation and fury from Perry-defenders, Governor Perry owes his base some reassuring words on Islam and the jihad.

Here is the board of Trustees http://www.saisd.net/main/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&Itemid=8

Here is some info on voting patterns http://gregsopinion.com/pedia/index.php?title=San_Antonio_ISD

Aga khan is a true meaning of a false prophet.

Their religion is a joke itself, Ismail's are linked to 'hashish' arabic term for assasins, and little side note they 'hashish were the first ever islamic suicide squad (surprise surprise) lol
source: check out the bbc documentary about crusades.

Daniel Pipes replies:

"I agree with you that Geller's attack on Perry is irresponsible. The Aga Khan is a leading anti-Islamist figure and Perry's connection to Grover Norquist concerns taxation, not Islam."

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/188387

Norway's connection to Hamas concerns it's political arm; not its Islamic military arm. You see, like Norquist, Hamas has two separate and distinct arms.

Well, today I filled out the e-mail form on the below site, and referred to the speech, also below contained in the link, and informed Perry that we could no longer vote for him as he panders to the Muslims and knows nothing about Islam:

http://governor.state.tx.us/news/speech/5156/

Stick to your guns, Robert--you know how to follow your nose, and you know where to aim them.

Robert - Why don't you and Pamela have the courage to tell the world what your real agenda is? And how can the two of you so recklessly soil your reputations on this issue?

One year ago, Pamela Geller lauded the state of Texas, and Rick Perry's Texas State School Board for beginning to crack down on the Islamic Component of text books. (Click this link to see post at ATlas Shrugs a year ago regarding Pamela's cediting Rick Perry's School Board actions regarding this issue, saying every town in America should do what his school board did. Hypocrasy here?)

How can Pamela Geller get away from scrubbing her site and justify it of posts regarding the shooter of the Norway massacre and then jump on a school district for scrubbing links to Islamic studies, that clearly are in violation of the Texas School Baord under Rick Perry and then she and you blame HIM for those links, but up and when scrubbed.

You guys are are going to see this "firestorm" blow up in your face. And I for years thought you people were smarter than that.

Off the subject but this is amazing....everyone should see this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mge5Um4Lx4&feature=share

D:

Robert - Why don't you and Pamela have the courage to tell the world what your real agenda is? And how can the two of you so recklessly soil your reputations on this issue?
Why don't you read Atlas and figure out what her agenda is, instead of insinuating she has ulterior motives. Like it's a secret huh?
How can Pamela Geller get away from scrubbing her site and justify it of posts regarding the shooter of the Norway massacre...
She had done nothing of the sort. She has in the comments admitted she edited quotes referring to stockpiling weapons. These in no way incriminate her but, rather the shooter. Hence, no one has any evidence that Atlas or the SIOE is responsible for this.
You guys are are going to see this "firestorm" blow up in your face. And I for years thought you people were smarter than that.
I doubt that for years you held Atlas and Robert in high regards. You are a troll. You are here to try and get as much mileage out of ONE edited quote from of seven years of Atlas archives. Do you have anything else because I sure do?

There needs to be a website that addresses the textbook jihad. It can address specific textbooks and specific falsehoods and distortions, and it can also address the general tendency of islamic special interest groups to present a sanitized view of their beliefs and history. And it can address the issue of public figures who are in bed with these groups. When the school moms network discovers it, the word will spread like wildfire.

you can always look for an old version of a webpage in the Internet Archive's wayback machine http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
It's amazing what kinds of stuff you can dig up in the archive.

I'm not an American but it looks to me if Perry can learn from his mistakes you should lay off him. Looks like he and Marco Rubio would be a good combination to defeat Obama.
Its not a perfect world remember. Its human to make mistakes.

I see this issue from a different perspective then most here. I am that rare liberal democrat who reads (and agrees with most of what I read) Jihad Watch regularly. I think Obama is doing a good job (my disappointment is that he hasn’t been successful enough in moving things to the left), and for what ever my predictions are worth, I predict he will easily cruise to reelection in 2012.

But my point is, it is not my views on domestic politics or our president, that brings me here, but rather my desire to be informed on the threat that Islam represents to our shared values as a Western democracy. I note that Robert has a very different view of Obama and Democratic policies in general, to which I say, that is fine. My hope is that at this site we are united not on our views of American presidential politics, but on our view of Islam. It is Robert’s right to proclaim and endorse anything he wants (it is after all his site), but I would hope that we would spend less time talking about these issues and more on the Jihad threat. I think that Jihad Watch has a valuable role in educating people about this threat. To the extent that it is seen as a conservative partisan site, it will never succeed in reaching the huge numbers of people who do not identify themselves as conservative.

In that context it makes perfect sense to expose that Perry is weak on these issues. Certainly Obama has been criticized forcefully here for his short comings in dealing with the Jihad threat, and what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

I see this issue from a different perspective then most here. I am that rare liberal democrat who reads (and agrees with most of what I read) Jihad Watch regularly. I think Obama is doing a good job (my disappointment is that he hasn’t been successful enough in moving things to the left), and for what ever my predictions are worth, I predict he will easily cruise to reelection in 2012.

But my point is, it is not my views on domestic politics or our president, that brings me here, but rather my desire to be informed on the threat that Islam represents to our shared values as a Western democracy. I note that Robert has a very different view of Obama and Democratic policies in general, to which I say, that is fine. My hope is that at this site we are united not on our views of American presidential politics, but on our view of Islam. It is Robert’s right to proclaim and endorse anything he wants (it is after all his site), but I would hope that we would spend less time talking about these issues and more on the Jihad threat. I think that Jihad Watch has a valuable role in educating people about this threat. To the extent that it is seen as a conservative partisan site, it will never succeed in reaching the huge numbers of people who do not identify themselves as conservative.

In that context it makes perfect sense to expose that Perry is weak on these issues. Certainly Obama has been criticized forcefully here for his short comings in dealing with the Jihad threat, and what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.