State Department refuses to release documents about jihadist on CIA's kill or capture list, citing his right to privacy

Why is the Obama State Department worried about the privacy rights of this Islamic jihadist who has repeatedly inspired and masterminded plots to kill large numbers of Americans? "State Department: Don't Invade Privacy of Cleric on CIA Kill List," by Catherine Herridge for FoxNews, August 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

While the New Mexico-born cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, is the first American on the CIA's kill or capture list, the U.S. State Department refuses to release documents about al-Awlaki citing his right to privacy. This disconnect was uncovered as part of the ongoing investigation by Fox News' Specials Unit into the cleric who is a leader of a major Al Qaeda affiliate.

Through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in March 2010, Fox News requested "....any and all records maintained by the United States Department of State, in the passport file...." for the cleric. Initially, the request was referred to Human Resources at the State Department, before a formal response was issued more than a year later, in August 2011. The letter reads in part :

"The Department of State, Passport Services has reviewed your request and has given full consideration to the reasons provided. However, we have determined that your request must be denied. This denial is pursuant to subsection (b)(6) of the Freedom of Information Act. The release of this information to you would be an invasion of personal privacy of another person, without written authorization from that person."

The government refused to release the records for the terror leader who is well known to be the first American that the U.S. government has green-lighted to be killed or captured.

After 9/11, Anwar Al-Awlaki was a tier one, priority target for the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) in San Diego because of his known contacts with the hijackers. A State Department agent assigned to the JTTF, Ray Fournier, put together an arrest warrant for passport fraud in 2002. As part of that fraud, al-Awlaki lied on his Social Security application claiming he was born in Yemen, not New Mexico. At the time, there was not enough firm evidence to link the cleric to 9/11, so the passport fraud case was seen as a holding charge.

In addition, as Fox News was first to report in its special "The American Terrorist," the cleric fraudulently obtained $20,000 in scholarship money to fund his college education in Colorado. Al-Awlaki, who is a dual U.S./Yemeni national, claimed to be a foreign student. As an American citizen, the cleric was not entitled to the scholarship paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. According to the agent who handled the case, the documents still exist and are held by the State Department.

The denial of State Department documents is part of an ongoing pattern. In 2010, through the Freedom of Information Act, Fox News sought an FBI intelligence report, also known as an EC, that was written about the cleric and his radical ties two days before the cleric mysteriously entered the U.S. in October 2002 and the arrest warrant for passport fraud was pulled by the Justice Department. When the 27 page EC was produced by the FBI, all of the pages were redacted, citing national security and an executive order -- most likely, the warrantless wiretapping program.

Both the Justice Department and FBI have refused Fox News' requests and resisted calls from Congress to explain why the cleric was able to slip through the grasp of federal agents just one year after the 9/11 attacks. On Oct. 10, 2002, Al-Awlaki was held by Customs agents at JFK International airport for three hours until an FBI agent, Wade Ammerman, ordered the cleric's release, even though there was an active warrant for al-Awlaki's arrest on passport fraud....

| 11 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

11 Comments

I think "privacy" is just a cover for classified information that would be useful in special ops against Al-Awlaki. We wouldn't want the bugger to think we're watching him closely.

Historians will write that the West drank a potion and awaited death and submission during the 1970-2020 period.

We are being strangled by our unwillingness to call a spade a spade.


How effed up is that?

guy,

"We are being strangled by our unwillingness to call a spade a spade."

this is *IT* in a nut shell!
and until we (the west. not only the 'jw tribesmen') start to focus our energies on eliminating islam dictums and sharia, (no matter how 'light') from our midst, instead of enabling its followers and abetting those that have violated OUR LAWS by pigeon holing it as 'a cultural thing'....
it will only make it *THAT * much more difficult for patriots to fight this abomination.
yes at the end even the anderson coopers and wolf blitzers (spit!)will have their a**es saved by the very peole they vilify, *from* the very barbarian savages that they try to paint in a positive light...

it is really not that complicated, it is US vs THEM!
it is a zero sum game where there can not be a draw, but only ONE WINNER.
the longer this prelude takes, the higher the price we will pay.

I'm sure skein is right. The government wants to retain the information for security reasons, and since "right to privacy" is already in the bureaucrat's lexicon it was easy to fall back on it.

By falling back on bureaucratese the bureaucrats show just how stupid they really are. The terrorist is on a "kill list" and therefore has in effect no right to life, but he has a right to privacy? In the real world the right to privacy derives in part from one's right to life. This shows that some people in the State Department are seriously, and perhaps terminally stupid.

But we already knew that, didn't we?

This seems to be the normal for Obama and his administration. Another dark area is the death of 30 American soldiers in a chinook helicopter. Among these were some of the Navy Seals Team 6 who took out Bin Ladan. They were on a rescue mission in a regular chinook helicopter and not the specalist one that is always used for the elite team sent out. It just so happened that a single terrorist armed with a RPG was on location and was sucessful in killing all of those men with a lucky shot. Obama spits out that identity of the victoms including those of Navy Seals Team 6, which was a classified group. The cheers were seen all over by Obama's mistake. Or was it? Actually, no American president would even mention such classified statements pertaining to NS Team 6 to begin with. Makes me wonder who's who's in the Obama admin., though nothing this man does would really surprise me.

Shameful!

dear gary,

your comments are indeed echoed by many.
i invite you to read ann barnhardt's comments on this sad and tragic episode:
go to:
http://barnhardt.biz/
The Execution of SEAL Team Six (Part 1)
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - August 6, AD 2011 4:08 PM MST

Ah, you can find anything on the internet. This fellow though his site is somewhat extreme, fills in what I've already suspected. Additionally, he wants help in having parts of the Obama admin. investigated.

http://gulagbound.com/19905/muslim-brotherhood-in-our-white-house-and-the-murder-of-seal-team-six/

the phoenix, thank you for that info and link which I placed in my Favorites. I heard a ways back something pertaining to this, but with the recent events, it makes perfect sense by putting it all together. Of course we are all just crazy and Islam is the religion of peace as well. The brave woman who wrote that article has received a death threat for all her content. She should turn in this little freak at once.
Regards...Garry

Bureaucrats never reveal information that would embarrass other bureaucrats.

Wow. All this and $20,000 in free tuition too! Which, by the way, a U.S. citizen would not qualify for. This country is so f****d up.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter