Iran threatens to deploy warships near U.S. waters

Iran is threatening to put war ships off the U.S. coast? Iran's position in the global jihad is that of instigator. Iran's little President has many times declared Iran to be a martyr nation. He is willing to sacrifice the Iranian Muslim population in suicidal jihad. After all, in Islam the ummah (Muslim world) belongs to Mohammad's Allah and can be used for jihad. And, what better way to officially unite the Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad than to provoke a nuclear attack by the U.S.?

A nuclear missile could be sent up into the air from one of the Iranian ships next to the U.S. which could create an EMP explosion. Why don't our analysts state the obvious or are they afraid of causing panic and disturbing our "peaceful" relationship with Iran like they are with Pakistan? Retired Major General George Vallely has stated that Iran has nuclear weapons. An EMP explosion could be the end of the U.S..

http://biblesearchers.typepad.com/destination-yisrael/2010/05/retired-major-general-paul-e-vallely-admits-iran-has-nuclear-weapons-nuclear-iran-part-one.html

that is a shame Iran had such a nice navy you can see the headlines The entire Iranian fleet sunk by US Coast Guard. - oh the joys of free speech!

Last year Iran did threaten to send their own peace flotilla to Gaza to break Israel's blockade. But they punked out. It would have been a humiliation they could ill afford.

We let ourselves be distracted in Iraq and Afghanistan for ten years while the global jihad took control of Africa, killed off almost whole populations of non-Muslims (and Black Muslims), and plundered Africa's natural resources. (The world needed another defensive crusade against Islamic conquest, but we were not morally fit enough to do it.) Now, they don't have to bother with conquering the U.S. first, they can just darken the U.S. with an EMP.

thats no laughing matter treats like that could end up with Global Thermo Nuclear War if the Americans let a couple off then the rest will follow as long as one is aimed at Mecca all the better

It is time for the US to stop playing nice. With our satellite tech. we would see the Iranian navy moving in our direction long before they got here. Since Iran let its intentions be known, as soon as they got into position they should be sunk. Iran needs to be reassured that the US has a reason to be in the Med.sea, (Iran's rattling her sword) but Iran has no reason to be off the US's Atlantic coast. Force should be overwhelmingly applied, Iran should lose her entire navy in one fell swoop.

Iran is the trouble maker, but is US the troubleshooter, with no political will to fight Islamic forces??

Dilly dalling with Iran will prove very expensive at the end. Its time, take the bull by its horns.

If the superpower can not tackle a third word country like Iran, what else it can acheive?

During WWII germany deployed several u-boats along our east coast and caused enormous damage. From a tactical standpoint the U-boat attacks were far worse than pearl Harbor. For a period, the u-boats practically owned the eastern seaboard. Now that was a threat. Iran threatening to deploy one of their puny, dinky little gunboats is fodder for a hilarious Saturday Night Live skit.

l think if anything is going to happen it will be before the next president takes over the US.. knowing that obumbler is paper tiger they will use it to their advantage. maybe Israel will save us!

The completely nutty thing about this so-called threat is that the Iranian navy has absolutely no lines of logistics that could support such a tiny, detached flotilla thousands of kilometers from home.

Anyway, once the the crews of such ships saw the bright lights of New Yawk glittering in the distance, they would probably attempt to claim asylum in the US! End of 'threat'.

Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari is a clown!

'The mouse that roared', was a rat...

Everyone the world over needs to remember that Iran and the U.S. are still, ever since 1979, in a state of war. Whatever is to come should not be a surprise.

elcid1907:

We cannot be sure of the efficacy of an EMP attack.

First, uncertainy demands prudence. We have to prudently assume that an Iranian EMP attack on the U.S. would largely succeed, and we have to assume that an U.S. EMP attack on Iran would fail.

Why? Because the U.S. is much more dependent on electronics than Iran, and because no one has experience with a deliberate EMP attack. The 1950-era nuclear tests give only an idication of what could happen, they cannot prove it will work.

Second, prudence dictates that we must accept the possibility that the Iranian leadership is composed of apocalyptic nutjobs. We cannot dismiss the possibility just because we wish it were not true.

"We have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization... we must make use of everything we have at hand to strike at this front by means of our suicide operations or by means of our missiles. There are 29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and in the West. We have already spied on these sites and we know how we are going to attack them." - Iranian Army Chief http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fc7_1178306585&comments=1

An exercise in unbiased decision-making is to take one party and replace it with another - if you take a statement such as "an asian man that robbed 15 liquor stores last month has been released on parole." then change it to "a white woman that robbed 15 liquor stores last month has been released on parole." You then must temper your judgement based on the distilled portion.

Let's say that it was our (U.S.) near neighbours Brazil or Mexico that put WARSHIPS in our waters, would you be feeling the same fear?

I would. You should, too.

WARSHIPS, ladies and gentlemen. Islamic, Catholic, or Pastafarian - those are people with big guns pointing at our heads.

A combination of a vacuum in brain-power, eyesight, geopgraphy and imagination has brought us here.
Egypt allowed Iranian ships to pass through Suez. (they were just convenintly standing by after a visiting ports routine to Yemen, Suadia Arabia.
Then Syraia agrees to an Iranian naval base at Latakia; how helpful to assist those Gallaway runs to Gaza from Turkey.
Oh, not to put a damper on things has anyone noticed a massive Israeli-Cyprus natural gas field in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Now, think - in terms of Geopgraphy. Draw lines to the sites mentioned. Then THINK again.
Then try to tell me that this intentional hegemony is only a religious thing.

A nuclear EMP has a short and long pulse. The long pulse will create excessive currents in both above and below ground wires which will burn out power transformers and power lines. This unintentionally happened in Russia in the early 60’s near Kazakhstan after a 300 kiloton nuke was exploded at high altitude. Power stations and power lines were set ablaze by the Russian EMP. At that time there were very few semiconductors in commercial use and certainly non near Kazakhstan. The short pulse that comes shortly before the long pulse has been thoroughly tested in simulators and will induce tens of thousands of volts on wires with lengths of a few feet or more. This means that any semiconductor device that has a wire with a length of over a few feet that is attached to semiconductor circuitry will be disabled. The worst part is that this disables power station automatic shut down systems just before the long pulse hits the system so that the grid system is destroyed. Couple this with the fact that our entire transportation, financial, and other life essential systems are semiconductor computer based and would be immediately disabled in a cascading order. The repair job would be too big to handle for service personnel with special power transformers not available for possibly years. Add to this the fact that the high altitude nuclear burst will spread radioactive waste in orbit which will disable most of our satellites for a prolonged period.

Would Iran do this? Would they not suffer the same fate if we retaliate? Would we not retaliate by leveling Iran? Those are the questions and we have no answers. The Russians and Chinese both have EMP nukes but they are both rational trading societies. Iran has demonstrated irrationality by their devotion to the Mahdi and their way to bring the Mahdi back from the well. Personally, I doubt that Iran would use their identifiable military warships for such an attack when they could use unidentified trawlers manned by terrorists to attack us anonymously. However, their warships could be a forward reconnaissance effort for the terrorist trawlers that they may send in the future. What better way for them to bring the Mahdi back then to destroy the USA anonymously and watch us devolve into chaos and death. Iran is a primitive society and could continue to live without modern conveniences but we cannot.

Day dreamers! Quite like Pakistan where bloggers believe that the Indian economy is no match to theirs. Funny enough, quite a number of Iranians are dreaming in the same clouds.. They believe their country to be the second emerging Asian economy after China and that they would be a superpower pretty soon! I guess the Mullah brigade and their harem is playing a fatalist card here.. 'Inshallah', and there goes Iran, off the world map! Oops!

If they stay in International waters then I say it's perfectly fine, they are within their rights.

The US does it all the time. Don't like it when someone does it back, of course.

If it's really a threat then extend the territorial waters.
Until then sorry, but one rule for us and another rule for them is an insult to anyone's intelligence.

And in fact, if it shows how logistically incompetent they are and once again writing checks that Iran can't cash.... then all the better.

Everyone else.... the flag's a little too tightly wrapped around your gizzard. Give yourselves a break.

Iran is an evil country znd society evil plays, works, and fights evil. Iran is an Islamic state it must act accordingly. With those two things in mind Iran can not act on its own.

The good news is there are other Islamic states whom are paid billions of dollars weekly by the citizians of the United States for oil and gas products. If all hell breaks loose that market will end (fail) within 2 weeks.

Just as important is the fact that no Islamic nation or citizen would step outside of Muhammads mindset. Which simply means Muhammad was the perfect man in every way. All Muslums are to follow (submit) accordingly. Its important to know exactly how Muhammads army always used taqiyya to gain the enemies trust just before he would behead them and win the battle. Evil (Satan) is also a great trickster whom would first gain the trust of his victims prior to betraying them.

Iran will not announce its offensive prior to battle. Why? Because that is not the way of Muhammed or Satan did it. Tricking your future enemy into believing he is your friend is of great value prior to battle. Its like killing someone who is sleeping but it works really well.

Iran would be stepping out on its own if it did announce its battle plan without the approvel of Muhammad, Sharia Law, or the other Islamic nations. Something which may even anger Allah. Its just not like Islam to be honest with kuffars.

Nonetheless, never ever trust them and you'll never be sorry. Which all of Islam, like you would watch a poisonous snake and never ever trust them.

I can't reveal my sources, but the U. S. Navy is taking this seriously. So seriously that they have begun moves to requisition certain specialized civilian vessels. Yeah, they're the glass bottomed variety, which the navy is going to use to allow people to see what happens first hand when some ametuer jerks try and step up into the big league. Current bets are that irans " navy" should last about as long as a politicians promise ... ok, maybe not that long.