Al-Qaeda on al-Awlaki killing: Hey, now, that's not cricket

Jihadism is turning gradually into effeminate Islamism, it seems. Crying foul when things don't go your way...Deep down those guys are all wusses, really.

Maybe that's not such a bad thing to know about them...

Now that the Al Wacky case has established a precedent, let's take out dozens more. Bombs away! :)

Bullies are cowards, whiners and complainers when they don't get their way. The history of mohammedanism is rife which such examples. I'm not surprised.

Has anyone given the news to Umar Farouk "Anwar is alive" Abdulmutallab?

Will the weenie roast Abdulmutallab then switch to the conspiracy theorists' line that Al-Awlaki was killed to conceal CIA involvement in 9/11, or would that be too close to Ahmadinejad's view.

“Where are what they keep talking about regarding freedom, justice, human rights and respect of freedoms?!” the statement says, according to a translation by SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors jihadist Web sites.

Cherry picking laws to suit one's murderous world domination ambitions is not cricket either. We have laws to "protect our human rights and freedoms", not to enable jihad predators who would destroy them and us. It just shows how little they understand our modern constitutional freedoms. These troglodyte 7th century Pagan Moon-god worshipers enamored with the exploits a a slave raiding, booty taking, misogynist delusional Bedouin warlord, whose fevered acromegalic brain dictated the whole world conquered and dominated for his bloodthirsty malevolent god Allah, have zero understanding of what our natural freedoms and human rights are all about. The first caliphs did a monumental disservice to the billion Muslims around the world by keeping them rooted in Koranic/Sharia ignorance for all time. These ignorant critics have no reasonable argument and are the least qualified to lecture us on our laws. Killing Awlaki was just cause, by law. Khan kept bad Al-Qaeda company, so died too. Fair play.

The irony that a group that would destroy the U.S. Constitution if it had its way is invoking its tenets in protest is exceptionally rich.
...............................

Actually, this is only ironic for us—Jihadists will use *any* tool to enable Jihad and Shari'ah—even ones we provide them with.

More:

"Al-Qaeda joins those questioning legality of U.S. killing of citizen Anwar al-Awlaki"

Al-Qaeda has also criticized the Obama administration for killing U.S. citizens, saying doing so “contradicts” American law.
...............................

This has another purpose, as well—to attempt to make Americans look like "hypocrites"—to say we are not living up to ethical standards that Jihadists would never adhere to themselves.

In this way, it is very much like the hard left—Here's "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules" from Saul Alinsky's book "Rules for Radicals".

"When pressed to honor every jot and tittle of every law and statute; every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet; and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether..."

Alinsky sought a Communist utopia, and the Jihadists an Islamic one—apart from that, their methods are often quite similar.

Isn't the very nature and extreme level of their violence, in the end, counterproductive to their cause. What do we remember and is the worst thing about Nazism? The ovens. The mass murder. The hatred of the Jooooze. Its the total lack of any humanistic compassion for their fellow humans. The fact that they whine at a somewhat minor victory is the Achilles heel. Aw, you didn't play fair. Right! The very nature of your total disregard forces us to do what it takes to stop you when we can. Don't do the crime unless you can do the time. The key is to continually compare their behaviour to history's worst. They are total hypocrites. Murder and rape in the name of your religion or "ism" has always failed in the end. Pray for many more sites like JW to enter the education race to the end. It is, somewhat slowly, working in the national consciousness.

The sheer utter shamelessness of this gang of murderers beggars belief.

hypocrites of the highest order.

G K Chesterton, from his 1915 essay, 'The Barbarism of Berlin', on the subject of what constitutes real savagery:

http://www.fullbooks.com/The-Barbarism-of-Berlin.html

From part II, 'the refusal of reciprocity'.

"The definition of the true savage does not concern itself even with
how much more he hurts strangers or captives than do the other tribes of
men.

"The definition of the true savage is that he laughs when he hurts you;
and howls when you hurt him."

"He laughs when he hurts you, and *howls* when you hurt him".

That's the Ummah, or Mohammedan Mob, to a T.

They feel entitled to *hurt* us as much as they like; but they believe they should be able to do so with absolute impunity, without ever getting even their pinkie hurt in return.