Jay Leno's wife: "The Qur'an is more liberal with women than the Bible"

mavis leno.jpgLeading with the family chin


The Qur'an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: "Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will" (2:223).

The Qur'an also declares that a woman's testimony is worth half that of a man: "Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her" (2:282).

It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: "If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice" (4:3).

It rules that a son's inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: "Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children's (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females" (4:11).

Worst of all, the Koran tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives: "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them" (4:34).

It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures "shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated" (65:4).

Wife-beating, child marriage, devaluation of testimony -- where is all that in the Bible? There is polygamy, but it is superseded by monogamy. So what is Mavis Leno talking about, other than the fact that it is fashionable today to praise the Qur'an and Islam, especially while bashing the Bible and Judaism and Christianity?

"Women's activist Mavis Leno and CNN Muslim producer dialogue in Dallas," by Dina Malki for the Examiner, October 24:

At the 26th annual Dallas Women’s Foundation’s luncheon, Mavis Leno, wife of talk show's comedian Jay Leno, shared with the audience accounts about her journey into activism to help empower Afghani women and girls under the Taliban regime....

When asked about the role of Islam in the status of women in Afghanistan, Leno confirmed that “the Quran is more liberal with women than the Bible.” She added that Prophet Mohammad was married to a wealthy and powerful woman, implying that Islam has nothing against empowering women; on the contrary it is a religion that supports women’s rights. Culture, on the other hand, affects the interpretation of religious texts which results in assaulting women’s rights....

| 73 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

73 Comments

| Leave a comment

It seems leftists cannot read the koran or allow the facts to get in the way of their thinking. all l can say is thankful for the internet which allows people like Robert to write the truth and FOX news!

Freedom of speech. Fortunately a crucial factor in that equation is the freedom to ignore idiots.


OK guys, time to mobilize a 'contact' campaign, just as was done with the hotels.

Someone needs to read the Qur'an.

I sit here and read such words and am just stunned.

How I wish an old online friend was still around. I remember years ago I was making the point about how liberal feminists (especially the celebrity ones!) are silent when it comes to Islam's treatment of women. Right away she chimed in and mentioned this woman - whom I had never heard of, nor of any of her work.

This is what she calls standing up for women against Islam? Laughable.

A "Women's Activist," - more likely, Mavis Leno, a useful "dhimi" - Hollywood, the land of liberal leftist idiots.

Given her long awareness and involvement with the plight of women in Afghanistan, this is truly shocking. Islam's ability to infect the minds and basic objectivity of almost anyone is amazing...

Let's not be to quick to demonize Mavis Leno. If you read Ahmed Rashid's Taliban, you'll learn that Mavis Leno was one of the first and only Americans of any prominence who spoke up against and raise awareness about what the evil of what the Taliban was doing in Afghanistan in the 1990s.

I wish she understood the dangers of Islam for women, but I have to give her far more credit than the average liberal or conservative for recognizing what the Taliban were up to early on.

She looks like a nice girl. Dumb as a rock apparently, but probably a nice girl.

.?. Mavis, as-in Beavis Butthead ? Crumbs

She is using the mouthings she had to use to be able to get the audiences and facetime she needed dealing with the pc-crats and headloppers of the NGO system and Afghanistanis themselves.

I go again to an argument that has yet to be answered:

If all this human rights devastation is "cultural," why then is Islam unable to overcome these nonreligious scourges on humanity? Is it such a weak and powerless faith, and are its practitioners so insincere that a family would rather cut off its daughters labia and clitorises, deny them free movement, own the rights to their reproductivity, dismiss their reports of sexual assault, and deny them proper medical care, than do all the liberating things that Islam is apparently prescribing?

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --Martin Luther King Jr.

The depth of Hollywood's dangerous well of "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" is truly astounding. Mrs. Leno manages somehow to combine both traits in one vacant mind.

Wasn't Mohammed's first wife a wealthy widow? So that this "wealthy and powerful woman" owed her status to her late husband? Mohammed was more or less in the position of John Kerry marrying Teresa Heinz.
And remember that their marriage was pre-Islamic -- they were married in or about 595, and he didn't begin his career as a "prophet" until 612. How many "wealthy and powerful" women were there after Islam was established?

"She added that Prophet Mohammad was married to a wealthy and powerful woman, implying that Islam has nothing against empowering women;"

No, it implies muhammad was a leach, who expected wealth to be given to him, and that he wasn't above manipulating a woman to get it.

OK, try some of these. BE POLITE AND INSTRUCTIVE. Any verbal 'abuse' will be seen as sexism, not an indicator of outrage at her ignorance about the reality of islam. Quote from sources - you're all good at that!

http://www.apbspeakers.com/speaker/mavis-leno

http://www.brooksinternational.com/Mavis_Leno_970.htm

http://fmpac.org/

Create a page on Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mavis-Leno/103392643049144

Or go through her husband (perhaps a better idea):

http://www.fanmail.biz/3052.html

If we make enough noise he might allude to it on his show. You really only need to write one informative letter and copy it to all the addresses. Onward, JWers!

What a moron. Another example of the liberal contempt for the truth and an utter disregard for the people they purport to be helping. They do the same thing with inner city school children. The libs have run the show for over 50 years in all of America's inner city and the quality of education just keeps going down, yet they care and conservatives are heartless. What a crock. Phony baloney slimeballs.

It is TRUE she was AGAINST the TALIBAN's MISTREATMENT of WOMEN,I give her credit for that.But her statement that the KORAN treats women better than the Bible is absurd.

The Koran says a Muslim Man can have a Muslim Woman as his Slave

It also says the slave can be freed...but only if she/he deserves it

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/09/01/a-muslim-slave-woman-can-be-freedbut-if-the-muslim-master-thinks-she-deserves-it/

THE BIBLE

Mosaic Law says:

1.A slave who escapes is free,that includes a woman slave

2.Every 50 years all the slaves are free

http://www.antisharia.com/2010/04/26/slaverythe-koran-and-the-bible/


Prophet Mohammad was married to a wealthy and powerful woman, implying that Islam has nothing against empowering women

Mohammad married his first wife when he was 25 ... 15 years before he received his first revelation at age 40. He started preaching some years after that. And it still would have been some time before one could say that Islam was established as a religion.

So attributing his marriage to a "wealthy and powerful woman" to Islam is an obvious exaggeration and anachronism, as Islam did not exist when he entered marriage. The marriage was more likely for personal profit and ambition, and certainly not for empowerment of women.

Once he did start receiving his "revelations" (or demonic possessions, depending on your perspective), and Islam was established, his pronouncements turned women into sex objects and chattel available for use, misuse and abuse.

One has to be purposely blind and ignorant not to see this.

As expected of the wife of a comedian, she is a bit of comedic herself. Take for example the obligation under the Shari'ah to divorce ones wife, when the wife can't divorce the male. That's one example quite notable. The "beating" is apparently a remediation for divorce, and a prevention of it. Although Christians do the same thing, the Bible certainly doesn't, so she would be wrong if that's what she was meaning by "the Qur'an is more liberal than the Bible".

To keep it simple I suggest Mavis Leno pick up the book "Islam and the Bible--why two faiths collide" By David Goldmann from Moody publishers of Chicago.

In chapter 3,starting on page 80 the book deals with the "status of women" in Islam and its comparisons to the teachings in the Bible's New Testament are laid out side by side so one can easily see the differences. The alas from the various surahs are also noted as are the versus in the Bible.

Mavis's interpretation or statement rings completely hollow when one reads and compares the stark differences between how women are to be treated. I find myself at a complete loss as to how she can possibly make such a statement.

I can only conclude that she drew this ill gotten idea from comments made by Muslim women or men who constantly misrepresent what is clearly written and practiced in the Koran in the practice of taquiya and kitman.

Mavis needs to understand when she is being used, and the only way to possibly do that is to read the Koran,Syrah, and hadiths along with an understanding of sharia as it relates to the treatment and status of women in Islam.

Mavis you were a strong advocate against the vicious Taliban, please don't allow yourself to be a useful idiot of Islamic dawa that was considered the most noble of acts by Mohammed as an alternative to jihad.

And regardless, even if it said "slap your women daily" in the Bible, no Jew or Christian does slap his woman daily with the permission of scripture, firmly affixed by his government.

Again, why do half a billion Muslims routinely misinterpret the Qur'an? Bad translation?

Maybe Mrs. Leno should stick to handing her husband the socket wrenches and cans of WD40 whenever he works on his car collection.

Leno's wife is a perfect example of ignorance, and I use that word not as a noun but as a verb. As in willful.

Was she doing a comedy skit?

are you kidding? what is she smoking?
m

Oh these dumb Western feminists!!! They don't have have any idea what they are are talking about and have no courage to tell the truth and call Islam for what it is - a misogynistic criminal enterprise!!! One question to them - if Islam is so good to women why don't they convert to Islam and marry a Muslim. Then they will find out what the real status of women is in Islam. No wonder these dumb feminists never pay any attention and denounce the "honor killings" done by Muslims right here in USA and Canada. What a piece of human waste they have become now!!

When you are taught that european colonialism is evil, but Muslim colonialism is beneficial.

When the host population has been taught that they are no better than anyone else.

When the cultural and national sense of superiority of new immigrants is encouraged, while that of the host population is discouraged.

Then this is the logical outcome.
In the end, i suspect that liberals will convert to Islam.

She is absolutely right when she says the quaran is more liberal with women than the Bible - the quaran gives muzlum men complete liberty to beat their wives, use them as sex objects whenever and however they want (4:34) liberty to work them to the bone, kill them if they annoy or shame hi, turn them into babymaking machines, even the liberty to rape all the infidel women they want - the list of liberties that muzlum men are allowed by the quran, with women both their own and those of the infidel, is endless!

Poor Jay Leno. His wife is soooooo ignorant she knows neither Islam NOR the Bible. St Paul says husbands should love their wifes as Christ loves His church. Islam is the the Allah's (devil's) cult of misogynistic thieving murderous pedophilic lying perverts.

Hrmh.. OK, great then. When she or someone she knows is raped, and then slaughtered for "dishonoring her family by allowing herself to be raped" as stated under Sharia law, I'd love to hear from her or her lantern-jawed husband then.

Jay, on the other hand, will be loving it. "I can have multiple wives? Cool! I dig this little Sharia thing"

If it is cultural, then is she suggesting that it is inherent in Arab culture? I think not for then she would have to explain away the marked difference between Muslim Arabic culture and non-muslim Arabic culture.

Just another example of the bigotry and racism of the left. All Arabs...those brown people...are the same, don't you know. And the Afghanis, they're like Arabs, right? Well, they have a different culture from us enlightened ones, doncha know?

Have her live as a muzlum woman in the muzlum country of her choice for a week. She ll be singing a very different song I guarantee you.

Another dhimmwit!

Mavis Leno, pretty but dumb as a post, the perfect poster child for a "dhimi". I'd say poor Mavis, but the real victims are the muslim women who through are abused everyday by the Islamic system. Their only crime was to be born into this mentally diseased society, and when you live with abuse long enought its the norm. Yes, the real victims are the abused muslim women who have had/been:
1. Acid thrown in their face
2. Forced into a marriage at 8 or 9 years old to a man 30, 40 or 50 years older
3. Abused by their husbands; beaten and raped
4. daughter, mothers, aunts "honor murdered" because of their fathers loss of Honor
5. Had the clitoris' removed, which destroys their sexual pleasure. All because their women and it keeps them cleaner and less likely to sin.
6. Forced to wear heavy clothing or be totally veiled so that no man would have impure thoughts about them
7. To be counted half the worth of a man in a court of law, in death, and in inheritance.
8. To be owned all of their lives by a man.
9. Raped and not be able to speack in their own defense. To be murdered because you were raped because only the witness of 4 male muslims prove rape.
10. To be divorsed by the words, I divorse you 3 times and literally thrown out. Basicly never to truly see your children again.

If Mavis Leno wants to truly be a Womens Activits, let her go to the hospitals and nurse the mained victims of muslim mens abuse or she can go to the jails and hear the stories of the women incarcertered for alleged sexual crimes.

Explains why her husband told Herman Cain that it was UnAmerican to not appoint a muslim to his cabinet.

Hey Rich Mavis - Put on a Burqa, why don't you? Or a Niqab - with a mesh veil in front of your face.

We won't be watching your husband anymore - tell him that.

For liberals/feminists, women's rights = abortion and nothing else. They are a single-issue group. As a recovered feminist, I know what I'm talking about.

THAT is why Sec of State Clinton is mute on ANY of those points that Robert brought up in this post. Beatings, genital mutilation, child rape, any sort of rape, honor killings, educated women, driving women . . . none of it truly matters because she is a single-issue mindset when it comes to women's issues.

It would be endlessly fascinating to have Mavis or any other feminist lunatic actually live like a native in any country stretching from North Africa, across the Middle East, into Far Eastern Asia. But, the thing is, I wouldn't wish such treatment on ANYONE!

Switch to Letterman.

I am 100% sure Ms Leno knows all this First Hand:

1. Acid thrown in their face
2. Forced into a marriage at 8 or 9 years old to a man 30, 40 or 50 years older
3. Abused by their husbands; beaten and raped
4. daughter, mothers, aunts "honor murdered" because of their fathers loss of Honor
5. Had the clitoris' removed, which destroys their sexual pleasure. All because their women and it keeps them cleaner and less likely to sin.
6. Forced to wear heavy clothing or be totally veiled so that no man would have impure thoughts about them
7. To be counted half the worth of a man in a court of law, in death, and in inheritance.
8. To be owned all of their lives by a man.
9. Raped and not be able to speack in their own defense. To be murdered because you were raped because only the witness of 4 male muslims prove rape.
10. To be divorsed by the words, I divorse you 3 times and literally thrown out. Basicly never to truly see your children again.


Then she confirms:
“the Quran is more liberal with women than the Bible.”

My guess she is as much clueless about the Bible as she is about the Kuran.

I e-mailed the Leno Show with this JW link and said because of his wife's stupidity we wouldn't be watching his show anymore. Hope he enjoys that.

Correction -
The first line should read-

I am 100% sure Ms Leno knows all this First Hand from the women who experienced at least one of the following doses of Islamic medicine:

End Correction -

A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Or as former Vice President Dan Quayle once said, " What a waste it is to lose one's mind."
No matter how you put it, that woman is really,really dumb.

She obviously has not read the Quran or hadith. You can't blame her for her ignorance, but you can blame her for speaking authoritatively on a subject she is ignorant about. Here's a little something that can help her: a small booklet I wrote about women in Islam from the Quran and hadith, free for download: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65223569/Women-in-Islam-What-Muslims-Don-t-Want-You-to-Know

So, what's new? One more entertainment industry airhead mouthing ignorant platitudes.

Leftism will usually trump intelligence---as here. Really, is anyone surprised anymore at how foolish modern liberals can be? Hell, they're a greater problem than the Muslims because they are so eager to run interference for the Muzzies. No, not every conservative "gets" Islam, but almost all who do are conservative. Meanwhile, liberals aplenty are playing the role of useful idiot par excellence for the world's most troubling religion---as here.

I stopped being surprised long ago by liberal foolishness. I've taught mucho numbers of liberal students and have had numerous conversations with liberal faculty members over the years and when things like facts and common sense and general intelligence come up against leftist ideology, nine times out of ten leftist ideology will win hands down. It's a mental thing. And not a good mental thing. And liberals are utterly clueless of this. In fact, they actually think they're enlightened. Really. Upside down world. Time to pop a cold one.

When I was among Muslim people in the Sudan, they told me many fanciful things about Islam which I felt were suspect. Before going there a second time, I took the trouble to read the Koran. So when they again said strange, deluded things about the kindness of Mohammed, his abolition of slavery or whatever, I could refer them to their "holy book"; with some misgivings, as I didn't want to set them on the path to jihad! And yes, some people there would excuse certain Islamic practices by saying they were not Islamic but "cultural".
So if you don't take the trouble to study, it wouldn't be beyond the realm of possibility to assume that people of a certain religion would actually know something about its basic tenets.
In my experience with Muslims,they have either been deluded or they have lied.

I think Mavis Leno is a good and decent women and I sincerely hope that she does not allow herself to be seduced by the charm of dawa used by Muslims.

Dawa used on non Muslims is considered the most noble of acts before they apply jihad.

Well.

No more Leno on the boob tube for me.

Notice how these "useful idiots" who praise Islam, always do so while enjoying the freedoms of the non-islamic, free (for now) West.
What she needs my son is a holiday in Somalia.
Perhaps then she would change her tune after having to change her Western clothes for a Burkha!

A family of geniuses. Honestly, when was the last time you laughed at a Jay Leno joke?

Jay Leno School of Comedy
a) Blunder through joke to the punchline.
b) Butcher punchline.
c) Repeat punchline
d) Turn to guitarist and explain joke.
e) Guitarist and band split sides.
f) Cue commercial break.

Does he still talk about "white trash"? A classy guy indeed.

And now his wife is turning the monumental Leno brain to society, religion and the universe.

We are truly honoured.

"she would have to explain away the marked difference between Muslim Arabic culture and non-muslim Arabic culture."
Also she would have to explain the similarity of behaviour in Islamic countries like Iran, Somalia, Saudi etc...
Now children, can you tell me what all these backwards countries have in common?
Duhh..

champaigne liberals. ignorence is bliss.

What you're talking about is religion, amigo. Liberalism is religion.

Yes, my friend, modern liberalism is indeed a religion, and a poor substitute religion at that. How ironic that today's liberals, who very much tend to be against religion in general unless it's those poor Muslims who are beat up upon by nasty Western conservatives, or a Christianity or Judaism that is so distorted to liberal ends that these religions bear no relationship to the real thing, are themselves true believers in the faux faith they have constructed. And they miss this completely. Well, after all, they miss a lot.

I really, though, don't mind these rubes being clueless. What I do mind, however, is that these silly people want to inflict their ill-thought-out beliefs on all of us (sorta' like Muslims do). Modern liberalism has a deep strain of totalitarianism in it as does Islam. No wonder that Muslims and liberals are allies. Not surprising in the least, but still, nonetheless, very stupid of lefties not to grasp how they're being used by people who would crush modern liberalism if ever given the chance.

Sometimes I wonder what I have more contempt for, Western liberalism or Islam. It's a close call.

Hope you're enjoying the present football season and also enjoying fine brews while doing so. Take care, Cornelius.

"Modern liberalism has a deep strain of totalitarianism in it as does Islam."

Very true, and very disquieting for old-fashioned liberals like myself. The only conclusion I can come up with is that this strain is precisely the result of liberalism having become a religion in the late 1960's. Religions all foster a deep need to be right, and unless they contain admonishments to develop humility (as Judiasm and Christianity do, and as I suspect most Eastern religions inherently do), they will breed fanatics who cannot honor their opponents and who will always seek to destroy apostates.

I don't recally reading in the Bible, either Hebrew Bible or Christian NT, anything akin to Allah's command to beat disobedient woman.

I don't recall anything in the Bible that comes close to Muhammed's statement that "women are inferior in intellect and inferior in religion."

I can't think of anything in the Bible that discredits a woman's testimony or impinges upon her rights of inheritance.

Did I miss that in any of the many times I've read the Tanakh or the NT?

"She added that Prophet Mohammad was married to a wealthy and powerful woman, implying that Islam has nothing against empowering women; on the contrary it is a religion that supports women’s rights. Culture, on the other hand, affects the interpretation of religious texts which results in assaulting women’s rights...."

Oh, how I hated it when I was trying to explain Islam's role in the treatment of women and then some well-intentioned but ignorant Muslim-defending secular Westerner, in concert with a Muslim present, and with a few other people around, first came up with this "blame the culture, or anything-but-Islam".

Where I live, so many people will defend this lie. But perhaps what Winoceros wrote puts us on a good track of responding; If situations and behavior of self-confessed Muslims who themselves motivate their actions as motivated by Islam, are acknowledged to be anti-women's rights, anti-democratic, and abhorrent, then .....

Is not Islam terribly contaminated by "cultural influences"? Is Islam not therefore terribly and massively misunderstood? Is Islam not therefore terribly or even invalidatingly or even criminally unclear?

Since Islam clearly has a big political component, since it clearly intends to rule states and keep it's laws in states, I like us to compare Islam not to Christianity (and so the Quran to the Bible) but to our Democratic Constitutions. Who must be clear, and when massively-terribly misunderstood, must be augmented, amended, improved.

Muslims and Muslim-defenders who are also Islam-defenders in my experience resist that strongly. I think because they prefer to compare Islam with Christianity because it get's Islam off the hook. And so the Muslim-defenders can excuse Islam and stay friends with the Muslims.

At this point of reasoning to my mind then comes the question: Is there only one true Islam? Or can there be a few diverse legitimate versions of Islam? The Muslims then say that there is only one true Islam and they are prepared to explain it saying; Islam means this, orders this, prohibits that as if there is only one true Islam.

But the whole time Muslim-defenders refer to Islam as if it is mysterious, multi-interpretable, and indeed interpreted in different ways, and indeed by many Muslims as peaceful, no problem for democracy. But it is also tacitly understood and acknowledged by them that there are many "wrong", "culture-contaminated" interpretations of Islam.

I really want to get it out into the open now; If the implication always is that Islam is multi-interpretable and indeed in multiple ways interpreted, why can't we have much more clarity and accountability, Muslims clearly choosing sides?

I hope we evolve towards telling Muslims and Muslim-defenders that in this way increasingly ordinary Muslims simply forfeit all trust and credibility when just saying they are Muslim and believe in Islam. Because "Islam-just-like-that", that is simply far too culture-contaminated, vaque, ambiguous, usable by all sorts of criminals and lunatics.

Let Muslims and Muslim-defenders be forced by logic to specify; how they interpret Islam, what is their version of Islam if possible, and what does it say on all disputed issues, pertaining to democratic principles, like equal rights for women?

I can picture Jay Leno coming on stage with his spiel:

“Say, you hear about that woman who said the Koran promotes women’s rights and prohibits their husbands from beating their wives?”

Audience reaction:.

“Of course she said that after her husband gave her a knuckle sandwich.”

Audience laughter.

Poor Mrs Leno. I hope her illiteracy clears up.

If her argument is based ob the fact that mohammad married a rich & powerful lady then she must be educated that when they got married neither of them were a muslim. The first revelation (allegedly) came to him after their marriage.

Mohammad was a camel driver who got a job with Khadijah, a rich widow businesswoman, after her husband died and left her wealth to manage. Mohammad's job was to drive caravans with goods. He was 15 years younger than Khadija and eventually she decided to marry him when he was 25 and she was 40. When this powerful wife died in 619 at the age of 64, Mohamed was 49. Soon after he married 12 women, the youngest of them, Aisha was 6 years old and he was 53. He "consummated" marriage with her when she was 9 y old and until his death at the age of 63, she remained his favorite wife.

Nowadays a guy who had sex with a girl 9 years old would be imprisoned as that Mormon guy in USA. So would a guy who has 12 wives, which is a privilege of rich Muslims in many Muslims countries. Osama bin Ladin had only 4-5 wives while his father had many more. The women in many Muslim countries are obligated to wear burkha or ate least a hijab and their rights are severely curbed. In Saudi Arabia women can be arrested if they drive!

Perhaps this pretty Jay Leno's wife should go to Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan villages to see how Islam treats women. Yes, there are sometimes exceptional women (like former Pakistani Bhutto who was educated in the West and was killed by the Jihadists), but an average women in sharia-ruled country is lucky to be considered half as much worth as man. In Gaza they recently had a mass marriage of adult men with 6-7 year old girl orchestrated by Hamas. Can such young girls give consent and can one talk about their rights under Islam?

Ignorance is not a bliss but a clear danger when promoted by mass media, which in the US are often whitewashing Islam, which needs serious reform if it wants to be considered as other religions in USA. It is incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and therefore many Muslim countries that are members of UN refused to sign this declaration.

I think you're quite right about the time line, Tom Davis, respecting the divide of old-fashion liberalism of the Truman/Attlee variety versus modern liberalism. I still have disagreements with the old-fashion kind (essentially still too much government for a Reagan conservative like myself) but the old-style liberal was just as realistic, sometimes actually more so, as conservatives were regarding what to do about major threats to liberty. Old-fashion liberalism was also not stupid about what constituted evil, didn't try to make excuses for it.

But all this started to be lost in the 1960s and a new breed of liberalism started taking over which was reflexively anti-Western, which tinkered with things that really didn't need to be changed such as school curricula and traditional marriage, which gave us the twin idiocies of multiculturalism and political correctness and which, in general, lost its collective mind while gaining strains of totalitarian elements. Damn shame.

Were the Truman/Attlee liberal still around in large numbers the West would be a lot better off, but such liberals are going the way of the dinosaurs. The liberlaism of today bears little relationship to this old kind and has been erected into a secular religion to boot. As I said, damn shame.

is phyllis chesler the only feminist in the west who can tackle islam?

OK, she was being interviewed for "JayWalking," right!?! Now we know where Jay gets the inspiration for that running gag.

Why do we have idiots like her be bothered by shutterbug? For a woman as idiotic like her, the smartest thing she could do is spell 'muhammed'. People like her are either cowards or new to anything beyond Walmart.. they just don't get it but would like to sound favourably intelligent!

Smile wide Leno Barbie, that was a nice joke(you made it)!

This is what happens when you take too many drugs.
This idiot apparently cant read. The bible is VERY Demanding on a husband and how he is to treat his wife....so much so that it says his prayers are hindered if he's not treating her right.
She is to be treated as a CO-HEIR an EQUAL.
Anyone who says the Quran does that is a lying ass fool and must expect that we are too.

"Wife-beating, child marriage, devaluation of testimony -- where is all that in the Bible? There is polygamy, but it is superseded by monogamy. So what is Mavis Leno talking about, other than the fact that it is fashionable today to praise the Qur'an and Islam, especially while bashing the Bible and Judaism and Christianity?"

Jesus taught us to treat others the way we'd like others to treat us. Perhaps someone should read the Bible again to refresh ones memory.

Now lets talk about the stonings, wippings, and beatings women get for their Muslim husbands approved by Sharia Law. Or the fact they Muslims women pray well behind the men while facing east. Or the fact that women are not allowed to drive or do half the things Muslim men are able to do. Or the fact that Muslim women must cover their entire body when in public and must walk behind men. Muslim women are murdered if they are suspected of adultery. I could go on and on but I think you get the idea.

Some times a little bit of knowledge it very very dangerous. Mrs. Leno not only has a misunderstanding of Sharia Law and Islam. But she insults the Bible, civil justice and Muslim women whom are surpressed and being killed all under the mask of "The Relegion of Peace".

Ignorants is no longer exceptable. We must all start being honest, even if it is very scary to think about. If we don't we will be subjects of Islam soon enough.


Wait a moment- -something's very wrong ! That's because Mavis Leno has always been adamantly anti-Islam in respect to fair treatment of women ! She and Jay took a great deal of time and spent a lot of effort fighting injustice towards Muslim women ! I know because she and Jay are some first reasons why I became interested in this subject in the first place . Her , Jay and Abigale Van Buren are the ones who inspired to to look, listen and hear as much as I could to understand what was really going on in the Muslim world. That was more than 10 years ago !

I say she's sounding like she's making an unfavarable comparison of women and the Bible and women and the Koran , but the article was cut short--wasn't it ? She was probably pointing out some missunderstanding, and what she says, or seems to be saying ,sounds bad because it's out of context. Where's the rest of her speech ?

Otherwise---I can't believe it--I'm shocked !!!

Wellington, ironically enough, my "enlightenment" about the Western, Leftist, "seeker" mentality came when I was taking a pleasure stroll in the hills above a town in the Hakka country of Taiwan. It had started to rain, and I ducked into a side building of a Buddhist temple--and the Buddhism of Taiwan includes Chan (Zen to the beat generation, who learned of it from the Japanese rather than the Chinese). There was a mural of the Buddhist Hell, in which a woman was being led around in a portable stocks by a demon warder, while a small figure tugged at her clothes. The monk explained it was the child she aborted. Later, when Taiwan legalized abortion, the Buddhist clergy squawke louder and more angrily than their Christian counterparts did; although that may have been a function of there being more Buddhist clergy on the island.

Well, back home there were all these long-haired types who hated Christianity because it denied "wymyn's right to choose", but they were embracing a religion that frowned on abortion no less than Christianity did.

Hence, my conclusion was that the Western Left and "counter-culture" (is it still "counter" in these early years of the 21st century?) isn't respectful towards the Saidian Other as much as it is fuming and hateful towards the civilization that allowed it to happen. Peter Viereck noted in _Metapolitics: the Origin of the Nazi Mind_ that there were a number of 19th and early 20th century German radicals of right and left who treated prisons as a refuge (Hitler in the Landesberg being a notable example), and suggested it was because of the turmoil of their own minds. I believe that the American Left's love of Communist regimes and now of Islam stems from a similar thing: people who simply can't handle liberty, and end up with internal disorder when they have it.

BTW, to all, I am grateful that I have an early teaching schedule. It spares me from ever being tempted by late night television, since I have to go to bed early and rise early. I've also decided that I will never watch Comedy Central, either. It's canned blasphemy against biblical religion and craven timidity about Islam long ago convinced me that the whole entertainment industry is no real friend of the First Amendment.

Jay Leno's wife: "The Qur'an is more liberal with women than the Bible"
............................

And that's why Muslim countries are so much more egalitarian than Christian nations or Israel...oh, wait...no they're not...

Prophet wrote:

Wait a moment- -something's very wrong ! That's because Mavis Leno has always been adamantly anti-Islam in respect to fair treatment of women ! She and Jay took a great deal of time and spent a lot of effort fighting injustice towards Muslim women ! I know because she and Jay are some first reasons why I became interested in this subject in the first place...

I say she's sounding like she's making an unfavarable comparison of women and the Bible and women and the Koran , but the article was cut short--wasn't it ? She was probably pointing out some missunderstanding, and what she says, or seems to be saying ,sounds bad because it's out of context. Where's the rest of her speech ?

Otherwise---I can't believe it--I'm shocked !!!
............................

This sort of thing is quite common, Prophet—in fact, it is almost an automatic reaction by some otherwise genuinely caring people in the West.

There are two factors—firstly, they are worried about offending the people who they are trying to help—or those who can hurt the people they are trying to help—and so they rush to assure them that they do not consider Islam to be the problem (even though it so clearly is).

Then there is the usual leftist self-hatred—it is not enough to laud Islam; the Judeo-Christian tradition has to be knocked, as well. Partly they realize that Jews and Christians and other Westerners are unlikely to react in a lethal manner, and partly that they probably believe that by "praising" Islam as an egalitarian creed, that they can make it so.

From what I know, Mavis Leno *does* genuinely care about the plight of Afghan women—but at the same time, she will never admit—either to herself or others—that it is Islam that lies at the root of that plight, and that so long as Islam does not change, neither will the condition of Muslim women...

She could be on Jaywalking! What's with this chin thing? She looks like Jay's sister!

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter