Afghanistan: Half of women in prisons are there for "moral crimes," EU documentary deemed too dangerous to women to be shown

"Amnesty International says it is important to "lift the lid on one of Afghanistan's most shameful judicial practices." That shameful practice is part of Sharia, under which four witnesses must support allegations of a sex crime. Thus, a woman making accusations of rape opens the door to charges of adultery if she has not obtained the necessary witnesses, in accordance with Qur'an 24:13.

Such a rule may not be officially on the books yet, but Sharia is enshrined as the highest law of the land in Afghanistan, and the constitution says nothing can go against it. It is already being enforced in practice, and any prospective reforms will come up against protests in the name of protecting the integrity of Islamic law.

"A decade after the Taliban were overthrown, Afghan women are still waiting for justice," because of fantasy-based policy-making that proceeded on the assumption that a moderate state would more or less fall into place once the Taliban were moved out of the way. Moreover, there certainly appears to have been the assumption that "real" Sharia would be a vast improvement over "Taliban" Sharia. That is also the fruit of politically correct, fantasy-based policy.

"EU censors own film on Afghan women prisoners," by Orla Guerin for BBC News, November 10:

The European Union has blocked the release of a documentary on Afghan women who are in jail for so-called "moral crimes".
The EU says it decided to withdraw the film - which it commissioned and paid for - because of "very real concerns for the safety of the women portrayed".
However, human rights workers say the injustice in the Afghan judicial system should be exposed.
Half of Afghanistan's women prisoners are inmates for "zina" or moral crimes.
A statement from the EU's Kabul delegation said the welfare of the women was the paramount consideration in its decision.
No official from the delegation was prepared to be interviewed about the film.
No new dawn
Some of the women convicted of "zina" are guilty of nothing more than running away from forced marriages or violent husbands.
Human rights activists say hundreds of those behind bars are victims of domestic violence.
Amnesty International says it is important to "lift the lid on one of Afghanistan's most shameful judicial practices".
The documentary told the story of a 19-year-old prisoner called Gulnaz.
After she was raped, she was charged with adultery. Her baby girl, born following the rape, is serving her sentence with her.
"At first my sentence was two years," Gulnaz said, as her baby coughed in her arms. "When I appealed it became 12 years. I didn't do anything. Why should I be sentenced for so long?"
Stories like hers are tragically typical, according to Heather Barr, of Human Rights Watch, who is carrying out research among Afghan female prisoners.
"It would be reassuring to think that the stories told in this film represent aberrations or extreme case," she said. "Unfortunately that couldn't be further from the truth."
She has interviewed many women behind bars, who were victims twice over - abused by their husbands, or relatives, and then by those who were supposed to protect them.
"You hear the story again and again of women going to the police and asking for help and ending up in prison instead," Ms Barr said.
A decade after the Taliban were overthrown, Afghan women are still waiting for justice, campaigners say.
Ms Barr said: "It's very important that people understand that there are these horrific stories that are happening now - 10 years after the fall of the Taliban government, 10 years after what was supposed to be a new dawn for Afghan women."
For many that new dawn has not come, but for Gulnaz there is now the hope of freedom.
Her name is on a list of women to be pardoned, according to a prison official, but as she has no lawyer, the paperwork has yet to be processed.
Gulnaz's pardon may be in the works because she has agreed - after 18 months of resisting - to marry her rapist.
"I need my daughter to have a father," she said.
| 34 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

34 Comments

| Leave a comment

Typical politically correct crap from the communist EU who can't handle the truth. Enjoy your power while it lasts EU, things are collapsing like a deck of cards around you, Greece, Italy etc are bankrupt, the EU won't exist in a years time. Notice these are the countries where muslims have illegally immigrated in their millions? At least the Euro countries can go back to protecting their borders when the EU comes crashing down.

Out of the frying pan, into the fire. Poor woman. It must have been an agonizing decision for her.
As soon as the rapist father can get his hands on his baby girl, he will start raping her, too.
Are the sexually abused children also required to provide four witnesses under sharia, or are they convicted right out of hand?
The Taliban may no longer be in power but nothing has really changed. We cannot save these barbarians from themselves.

"Notice these are the countries where muslims have illegally immigrated in their millions?"

Greece yes, but Italy - no way. I just hate it when some American conflates all European countries as if they are all the same.

There aren't many Muslims in Italy. The countries that do have them: France, Sweden, Norway, UK, etc. are pretty much OK for now. I wouldn't be surprised if this were used as an excuse for importing more Muslims ("see, if you don't import Muslims like France, you are going to go bankrupt like Italy!")

While the number of Muslim and African immigrants ruining downtown Athens is definitely not a plus, Greece's bankruptcy is mainly due to the hundreds of years of Ottoman Muslim occupation with its regular 'inshallah' fatalism, as well as the fact that it is an Orthodox country. These factors kept the Greeks away from the civilized Germanic-Anglo-Saxon world and its values of hard work and honesty, but closer to other values such as cheating others. Eventually, rampant cheaters are caught.

Obama bows to sauds who allow 6o year old wahabis to seize 10 year old girls in rape matrimony. nobody passes on similar stories in arabic.

http://international.daralhayat.com/ksaarticle/324325

Hello guys,

Please sign the petition to free Asia Bibi,the Christian in Paksitan who is in danger of death due to the evil blasphemy law(remember Charlie Hebdo).Why in Pakistan the journalists of Charlie-Hebdo would be DEAD by now

Already 475,000 have signed,dont be the only one not to:

http://www.callformercy.com/

PLUS


Check out the new website by Nabeel Qureshi,ex-Ahmadiya Muslim,now Christian,friend of David Wood(of answeringmuslims.com)

http://creed26.com/

And a NEW BOOK is coming out,one I find fascinating:

It is called "Satan's Trinity:Hitler,Stalin and Muhammad",buy it

http://satanstrinity.wordpress.com/

PLUS

1.answeringmuslims.com

2.answering-islam.org

3.thereligionofconquest.com

4.See the videos (click on "online videos") of abnsat.com(like "Jihad Exposed","Debate","Jesus or Muhammad").
The videos are also on youtube,write "abnsat".

Plus a new blog about the Persecution of Christians(mostly by Muslims)

http://www.persecutedfourchrist.blogspot.com

5.Also PYEM Ministry:

http://pyemministry.blogspot.com/

(very critical of Islam)

6.The blog "Debunking Quranic Science":

http://debunkingquranicscience.blogspot.com/

7.WIKISLAM(with 1,400 articles):

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Main_Page

8."Confident Christianity by Mary Jo Sharp":

Home Page:

http://confidentchristianity.com/

Her blog:

http://www.confidentchristianity.blogspot.com/

Also read:

antisharia.com and:

avraidire.com:

http://www.avraidire.com/

(in French and English),you can translate the French by copying and pasting with Google Translate:

http://translate.google.com/#

Reading the article, I was so glad, towards the end, that Gulnaz was expecting to be released - until I read the reason why.

24:2 "(adulterers) flog each of them with a hundred stripes"

24:4 "flog them with eighty stripes"
If a raped woman cannot show four male witnesses,
it will be seen from the coward sadist al-Lah (so-called "Allah") as adultary

http://schnellmann.org/i-will-fear-no-evil.html

Islam a religion? By what standards? It is political, it is military, it is sexual. It appeals to the basest instincts of male chauvinist, ignorant and savage cavemen who are completely devoid of conscience after having had that part of the brain lobotomized by Islam. In this, they are abetted by the leftists and feminists who reserve their primary anger for the 20th century and earlier white male who has long since been absent from their vaulted positions and is now docilely led around by a leash.

This is Islam 101, keep women under control by any means. The West doesn't understand this and is always astonished to find out atrocities on women in Islamic world.

Why can't we accept that we can't change or force these morons to behave like human beings as long as they keep following their hate manual.

Islam is a male chauvinistic, domestic violence abuser fantasy which rationalizes abuse of women and punishes women for being abused. Any sexual crimes under Sharia, including something as harmless as standing next to a man or speaking to a man, can bring an allegation of sexual misconduct. Under U.S. law, the standard of law is reasonableness (what a reasonable person would do or think) and crimes must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Under Sharia law, which enforces Islamic principles, conviction can be on the allegation alone and women cannot testify on their own behalf as that would be considered inappropriate (for her to talk about sex in public). A woman's testimony is also considered half of a man's. So, the accuser, whoever he can get to back him up, and the imam can be enough to stone a woman to death for no good reason.

Such an evil system attracts men who wish to dominate and control women, as sexual abuse is really about domination and humiliation of the victim. It also attracts insecure, inadequate men who feel low in the pecking order and lazy men who do not wish to be burdened with having to be reasonable with their wives. The Qur'an tells husbands to (sexually) plow their fields as they see fit and that they can beat their wives if they "suspect" them of being disobedient to them, giving them complete control under Sharia. Is it any wonder the recruitment efforts in the West are mostly aimed at prisons and macho, anarchist groups?

And Heather Barr of Human Rights Watch has become a member of SIOA, finally realizing that Spencer and Geller have been 100% accurate in their descriptions of Islam and its practices.

I SO wish your prediction becomes reality.

After over a decade and a Trillion dollars, with our young men coming home in bloody pieces, brain damaged or maimed for life, this is what our 'War' in Afghanistan has achieved. Obama is pulling a Nixon on the American people, using the promise of ending a senseless war to get elected TWICE.

The word 'fool' does not adequately capture the moral and intellectual fiber of the political and military clowns who are running the USA. This country will never win another war because it believes in nothing. The biggest military on earth cannot win a contest against scattered savages because it refuses to defend any principles whatsoever.

The EU. Nuff said.

I hate to say it, but for purposes of truth, it is important to note that the position of women is far better under the current Afghan government than under the Taliban. Look at the film "Osama":
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368913/

This is not to deny that the situation of women under the current government is horrible. As Robert (I believe) said, "In the Middle East, things always get worse." (Afghanistan is not in the Middle East, but is close enough).

We all know that as soon as the NATO troops leave, the current government will make a deal with the Taliban and the Haqqani tribe.

Hopefully, we in the Western countries will learn the futility of nation-building in Muslim countries. We have the power to topple regimes, but have very little control over what replaces them. The most we can hope for is to impress on Muslim governments that sponsoring attacks on the West is suicidal. So far, we've screwed up even that. Ghaddafi explicitly renounced terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and NATO air power toppled him.

Mary, I agree almost entirely with your comment. But how do you explain the numgers of Western women who convert to Islam? For my part, I can't imagine any reason why a woman would convert.

Dang! Make that "numbers of Western women".

Four witnesses must support allegations of a sex crime.. why? Because it was the only way for Muhammad to save his honor when his beloved Aisha spent the night with the handsome Safwan. Muhammad wanted to save his honor and at the same time he needed little Aisha (she was 13 at the time)so badly.
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/10/aisha-and-safwan.html

As those in prison and in macho, anarchist groups (such as private militias) are wooed, so are vulnerable, even beaten down (conditioned), weak, or somewhat childish women who cannot cope with or do not want the responsibility of an adult. Also, look at the tagiyya (Mohammad's deceit of war - against the West and non-Muslims). Women are told that all the covering up is to "protect" them and their modesty, that it is a positive, self-affirming "right" to wear the veils. They do not realize that they are in effect agreeing to be responsible for any man's lust for them, even for being raped. Even fully veiled, Muslim men have made the argument that a woman's eyes are too seductive, thus making her responsible for their lust. And, Western women do not realize that once women convert to Islam and start wearing the veils they are in submission, and if they stop wearing the veils they are in danger of being killed as apostate.

Gulnaz's pardon may be in the works because she has agreed - after 18 months of resisting - to marry her rapist.

"I need my daughter to have a father," she said.


Stay in jail, honey. It will be a much easier sentence.

Maybe this could be a storyline for one episode of "All American Muslim" and be turned into a spin-off..."All American Muslim: Fun with my Afghani Cousin".

The NATO/US invasion of Afghanistan was as disasterous as the Soviet Union debacle.

The similarities are quite striking.

NATO's leadership is in many ways a mirror image of the Soviet Union leadership at that time.

Laziness of thought, arrogance, a complete inability to look at possible pessimistic scenarios, no end game in sight, an underestimation of the problems in the country, an underestimation of the enemy, corruption both moral and economic, implementing conflicting strategies at the same time, no understanding of Afghan society, no desire to understand Afghan society, countless billions squandered while the hometown burns, critics being sacked, constructive criticism being labelled treason.....

And so it goes on.

And we could also talk about the (im)morality of invading a country.

You wrote:

'And we could also talk about the (im)morality of invading a country."
________

Well, I suppose we could talk about it, but I wouldn't be involved in the conversation very long except to say:

1.) Following what appears to be your line of reasoning, then the USA's "invasion" of the sovereign nation of Germany in WWII was immoral, right?

2.) The USA invaded Afghanistan after due warning was given to the ruling junta, the Taliban, to fork over Bin Laden after 9-11. They didn't. To equate our motivation for going in with those purely hegemonic motivations of the then-USSR is absurd.
_______________________

and you say...

"no desire to understand Afghan society".

That's just nonsense. You paint an extremely general painting without qualifying anything, which is not to say that I put much stock, anyway, in attempting to "understand" a bunch of Psychotic Barbarians hooked on a Cult of Personality and Pseudo-religion.

From the article - "I need my daughter to have a father," she said.

Some 'father'.

What if he gets a bee in his bonnet when the little girl is 10, or 12, or 13, or 14 (if he hasn't forcibly married her off by then), and 'honor' murders her?

Islam programs men to become 'killer roosters'.

In 1992, Irish journalist and author, Conor Cruise O'Brien, said this about Afghanistan: C ‘There are places where a lot of men prefer war, and the looting and raping and domineering that go with it, to any sort of peacetime occupation. One such place is Afghanistan. “

And places like that are not good places to be a woman, or a little girl.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/06/16/3244981.htm?section=justin

'Afghanistan most dangerous place for women'

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-26/afghanistan-dangers-of-childbirth/28

'Birth a deadly challenge in Afghanistan'.

And in the comments to the following article:

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/10/24/obama-adminstration-bans-the-truth-about-islam-and-jihad/2/

I found this, written by someone who had been a soldier in Afghanistan, and in Iraq:

"...I served 1 14 month tour in Afghanistan from Nov 2001 to Jan 2003.

"I can skip all the suicide bomber and IED attacks that killed innocent people that were committed by Jihadists, but I will tell about how I saw Muslims treating each other.

"One of the hardest things I ever saw was how Afghan men would treat their own families.

"I routinely saw Afghan men beat the living hell out of their young children and wives.

"In one villiage we had to helivac a 20 something yr old woman because the husband broke both of her eye sockets because she came and had took advantage of our humanitarian medical mission (to win hearts and minds)

"somehow the husband felt dishonored so he beat his wife and punched and kicked her wives face so badly she had 2 broken eye sockets and lost over a dozen teeth.

"Because we Americans are supposed to "respect their noble culture" nothing whatsoever happened to that husband...".


Thanks for replying.

I didn't say that all invasions are immoral, I said there is a moral dimension to invading a country. Sorry if it's confusing.

You wrote "The USA invaded Afghanistan after due warning was given to the ruling junta, the Taliban, to fork over Bin Laden after 9-11. They didn't. To equate our motivation for going in with those purely hegemonic motivations of the then-USSR is absurd."

So why waste 1,000's of Infidel soldier's lives then? Just launch a few cruise missiles. The downside to that of course was NATO/US would need decent intel which in turn means understanding the people. Senior US Generals have returned from Afghanistan and - to their credit - are openly admitting NATO still don't have a clue about the place. 10 years on.

The Soviet Union invaded the country in a brilliantly orchestrated military operation. NATO likewise.

Then what?

For the next 10 years or so, The Soviet Union suddenly realised it was there for no good reason and spent the following 10 years just clinging to the cities and main roads in the forlorn hope the Afghan Communist party would stop trying to kill itself. They invaded and had no exit strategy. The KGB had advised aginst invading. Only a bunch of elder old duffers 1,000's of miles away could possibly expect the feuding to stop and all those myriad tribes to suddenly live the socialist ideal.

Look at NATO. What on earth have they been doing in Afghanistan for the last 10 or so years? Ah yes, building democracy. Only people of such breathtaking arrogance and laziness could even think about throwing soldier's lives away on democracy in Afghanistan.

The great John Loftus and ( even greater ) Joseph Bodansky (sp) had a great chat on one of John Loftus' radio programmes a while back. It might still be possible to get it on the net. Mr Bodansky, who gets a lot of his intel from Mossad, shook his head at the sheer stupidity of NATO and their hopelessly naive "Operation Democracy" in Afghanistan.

To invade a country and not to bother looking at the make up of the society - tribal, economic, ethnic, religious etc - is of a crassness that borders on the insane.

Democracy in a tribal place like Afghanistan is just as dumb as expecting to build a socialist Utopia there.

Those old bastards in the Kremlin were lazy when they ordered the invasion of the country and so were NATO.

Heck, if you want to kill someone use a couple of cruise missles.

I wouldn't throw one increasingly worthless Euro or a dime at the country.


ewha1,

I agree with a lot, but not all, of what you say. You are perfectly correct that a war to establish democracy in Afghanistan is the height of stupidity, and also correct that the occupation gave very little thought to an exit strategy.

However, I remind you that the Clinton administration sent a flock of cruise missiles against an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan, with no effect. As you pointed out, cruise missiles have no effect without strong intelligence.

I think our invasion of Afghanistan was far more justified than our invasion of Iraq. Afghanistan had just hosted a very costly attack on US soil. If that doesn't justify an invasion, then what does?

Our mistake was to treat the invasion as an exercise in nation-building. That led to the initial escape of Osama bin Laden, when our troops entrusted Afghan fighters with the task of actually capturing bin Laden, who was in the Tora Bora region. The Afghans, quite predictably, let him escape.

The correct strategy would have been to go in, topple the Taliban government, capture and extract bin Laden, and leave the country to the tender mercies of the Northern Alliance. In all likelihood, the Taliban would have soon recaptured control of most of the country. That's fine. They would have been taught the lesson that they are much better off not hosting attacks on other countries.

The huge delusion, in both Iraq and Afghanistan, was that the US occupation would have any influence in changing the basically tribal and Islamic point of view of the people. I won't even talk about the utter disaster of the Iraq invasion, who's main accomplishment was to take out the only formidable natural enemy of Iran in the region, other than Israel.

Thanks for the reply

"I think our invasion of Afghanistan was far more justified than our invasion of Iraq. Afghanistan had just hosted a very costly attack on US soil. If that doesn't justify an invasion, then what does?

Very true.

Thanks for the reply

You wrote

"I think our invasion of Afghanistan was far more justified than our invasion of Iraq. Afghanistan had just hosted a very costly attack on US soil. If that doesn't justify an invasion, then what does?"

Very true.

I'll start at the end of your reply, and work through the rest, willy-nilly:
_________________

You said:

"Heck, if you want to kill someone use a couple of cruise missles."
_______

This speaks to a lack of understanding of warfare. You can't just lob missiles at bin Laden to get him. Besides, our stated objective (under Bush - everything that follows, I will not argue about) was to punish the Taliban that harbored him, and hopefully, get Binnie and have him face justice in America. We, and everybody else, have to put boots on the ground in order to dislodge a regime.
___________________

You also said:

"I didn't say that all invasions are immoral, I said there is a moral dimension to invading a country. Sorry if it's confusing."

No, you didn't say that ALL invasions were immoral, but as I said before, you failed to qualify the statement carefully enough to not suggest what you are now walking back. Also, you DID NOT say, specifically, that "there is a moral dimension to a country". It's not confusing - just don't claim to have not said things, or to have said other things which you didn't. Otherwise, I wouldn't have replied, in the first place.
___________________________

Also, this...

"The correct strategy would have been to go in, topple the Taliban government, capture and extract bin Laden, and leave the country to the tender mercies of the Northern Alliance. In all likelihood, the Taliban would have soon recaptured control of most of the country. That's fine. They would have been taught the lesson that they are much better off not hosting attacks on other countries."
_______________

Well, Sir/Madame, that is exactly the strategy we employed under Bush. We came, we destroyed, we missed Binnie, then, basically, left Afghanistan to its own devices while we went off to invade Iraq. In fact, the Taliban DID regain control of most of the country.
_____________________________

Finally, this...

"The Soviet Union invaded the country in a brilliantly orchestrated military operation."

Actually, not so much, by today's standards. They were ill-equipped to fight in cold weather, and what's more, had an active, powerful adversary in that our own government funded, trained and worked alongside the Muslims there in their fight against the Soviets. The real thing that brought down the Soviets in Afghanistan was shoulder-fired stingers, which caused such havoc with helicopters that the Soviets couldn't take it any longer...

Thanks for the reply.

You wrote

Actually, ( the Soviet invasion ) not so much, by today's standards.

I'm sorry but the Soviet invasion was indeed brilliantly carried out. It was the occupation that was a disaster. Much like NATO's. Great invasion crappy occupation.

I mean why would you honestly want to occupy a place like Afghanistan? I mean really, why?

"They......had an active, powerful adversary in that our own government funded, trained and worked alongside the Muslims there in their fight against the Soviets"

I'm glad you brought that up. Weren't the muslims in fact Mujahideen. And wasn't a certain Bin Laden one of those Mujahideen? Those were the days. Bin Laden and the US on the same side.

Not only the US of course.

I remember seeing then Prime Ministe Thatcher on the Pakistan/Afghan border surrounded by Mujahideen proudly talking about this proud alliance. She referred to "the believers" and pointing accross the border to Afghanistan, the "unbelievers". Dear me, the Mujahideen must have been pissing their britches laughing.

Also:"You can't just lob missiles at bin Laden to get him"

Why not? Is it illegal or something? Bad taste perhaps? Not gentlemanly warfare? The Marquis of Queensbury never mentioned Cruise missiles?

Your wrote "Besides, our stated objective (under Bush - everything that follows, I will not argue about) was to punish the Taliban that harbored him

Yes the Taliban did harbour him and it was certainly morally right to topple them. But, and lets be honest here, the difference between the taliban and tribe B or tribe C is pretty small, so what's the point of it all? Let Iran send their soldiers to deal with the Taliban, heck, they really hate them for what happened to the Shiites under Taliban rule.

So the alternative to smart intel and a few cruise missiles is 1,000's of dead servicemen, 10's of 1,000's seriously wounded, even more with PTS, trillions of dollars, quagmire, fiasco and the occupation of several mountains for the next zillion years......

Whoops, I printed too early.

a) That should have been "Marquess of Queensberry"

and

b) "Let Iran have the never ending headache of sorting out the Taliban." near the end.

Isnt it interesting that things are worse in the parts of the Muslim World (outside of Sub-Sahara Africa) that never were colonies.....

Afhganistan, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Yemen (at least most of it).

Turkey got better Europeized under Ataturk then any "colonialist" could have done, but mostly the non colonized countrys are far more barbaric then the colonized once.....

I mean wasnt there a poster here who argued that strictnes of Sharia in modern times is the product of "colonialism"....
Maybe he can tell us whous colony Afhganistan ever was?

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter