Three Michigan Congressmen write to Lowe's demanding it advertise on All-American Muslim

To: All knuckleheaded Congressmen and any state representatives who care to join them,

Re: Channelling Gen. McAuliffe,

Message: NUTS!

our corupt elected officails at work!!
m

Quislings and dhimmwits! In the breathless chase for votes, principles get kicked into the long grass.

All 3 utter and complete morons. They should be deported to Yemen.

There is a lesson corporations will retain: do not ever sponsor a TV show about Muslims. Stay away, the best advice.

Lowe's stick with your decision. Side with the people who do not want sharia in America. Lowe's you are making history and stick to your guns! Thank you Lowe's!

Have any of these IDIOTS ever heard of free enterprise?
The spokesperson for Lowes cleared the air on why they backed out.Quote:We reviewed the show and it sucks!What part of that statement don't these IDIOTS get.

I did a couple of sorties at the Low's facebook page this AM supporting their actions. A few posters have been attemting to dominate the site being highly critical of Low's actions.
If you can visit their site please show your support. bellow are some of my own commentary.

Thanks Low's for not helping this thinly veiled attempt at whitewashing the truth. Most Americans realize the show is nothing but propaganda which fails to educate the public regarding the two faces of islam, the jihad and the superficial face it puts on.

http://www.facebook.com/lowes

Lowe's, Stick to your guns and go down in history as being in the side of freedom.

Okay, class, I've had a wonderful time teaching this past semester. "Islamo-American Relations: Its Challenges" will again be offered next year. Please recommend it to your friends.

Your final exam will be next week. If you've been paying attention in class, you'll have no problem answering the questions. So that you may properly review and be prepared, here are some sample questions.

1. Hiring Muslims is a sound business decision. T or F? Explain (limit your answer to 250 words or fewer).
2. American corporations should go out of their way to support Muslim activities in the United States and should disregard the stated tenets of Islam to convert the world to Islam by any means necessary. T or F? Explain (limit your answer to 250 words or fewer).
3. Bringing more Muslims into the US is helpful to American relations and brings harmony to the country as a whole. T or F? Explain (limit your answer to 250 words or fewer).

Why don't they go the whole hog, and force, by law, the top ten companies in the US to advertise on it? They may as well the way they're going...

Metro Detroit is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in United States and I’m proud of our diverse culture."

Well your culture won't stay diverse for long if the British experience is anything to go by...
http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/multiculturalism-does-islam-bring.html

These Us congressmen are morons and do not know they assisting committing harakiri!! How are these stupid people ever get elected to the congress is a BIG mystery - or the general Us population is stupid and elects all these stupid people all the way to Presidency. case of dumb and dumber!!!

Why don't they go the whole hog, and force, by law, the top ten companies in the US to advertise on it? They may as well the way they're going...

Islam is more like an all-or-nothing political party, offering a complete displacement of all secular institutions and operated or directed from mosques by imams.

The shake down needs to be viewed as something politicians routinely do to extract campaign donations. Threaten negative action . . . get paid . . . put a temporary hold on the negative action until the next election cycle, repeat. In isolation, it does not matter which political party is doing it because the principal is the same.

But, the 32 congresspeople should do some research on the imam of the Karbala Mosque in Dearborn and ask him whether they have a future in the Hezbollah (Party of God) style replacement government that he would command. He too is a politician, and you should all get along just fine, provided the he always lands on top in every dispute.

Did I not read somewhere that several other companies also pulled their ads from the show? Why is Loews being specifically singled out?

Next they will be writing to every American demanding they watch the TV show.

I just can't wait for my letter....

ROBERT: "...three Michigan (what a coincidence) Congressmen..."

Sarcasm noted. Now, how about this....

"three Michigan, Democratic (what a coincidence) Congressmen..."

..odd....I don't ever remember any campaign by non-muslims calling for the boycott of companies because they sponsored this show. Anybody else find that strange?? (sarc)

anyways...Act 4 America has a petition going to support Lowes. Its up top 25000 signatures already.
Please go there to sign it.

http://www.act4america.org/

"Nearly 25,000 people have already added their name to our petition in support of Lowe’s. If you haven’t signed yet, please add your name here! "

unacceptable and it appears the decision was made out of intolerance for Muslims.

I don't think so, but even if that's the case so what? There is no natural force of the universe that says Lowe's has to love Mahoundians...Well maybe Allah, but he's not natural...

Being intolerant of Mahoundians is being intolerant of Islam which means being intolerant to Mahound and Allah, which means blasphemy...According to Mahoundians...Blasphemy is a serious violation of sharia law...These 'officials' are bowing to sharia, and trying to force Lowe's to do the same..Are their terms up soon?

funny thing l noticed these three congressmen are DEmocrats! how can they even look their fellow Americans in their eyes when they support such a travesty!

Ya' think Lowes has learned its lesson about
jumping into the pool with muslims? And how about those other 63 corporates who know it could've been--and could still be--them on the blunt end of this nonsense. These outfits are in business to sell their products, please their customers, make a profit. Getting dragged into a dirty political fustercluck like this one is NOT in their business plan!
And the more these muslims and their tools scream and bitch, the more obvious it is to people in positions to make these decisions that islam and free enterprise do not mix.

So, the bad guys find themselves in a hole and predictably, choose to keep digging. And, as usual with muslims, the more they talk...the worse it gets--for THEM...

If Lowe's is so hateful and anti-Muslim, why did they agree to sponsor All-American Muslim in the first place? Congressmen, use some common sense.

Lowe's was led to believe that All-American Muslim would be a nice, friendly documentary about nice, friendly Muslims in order to show the whole community that there were good reasons to be tolerant of one another.

Once the programme started running, it was discovered that a major character and several minor ones had links to terrorism. But this was never investigated or followed up. Nor was there any commentary on the intrinsic intolerance promoted by the Amen family (the Catholic family conceded everything to the Shia; the Shia conceded nothing to the Catholics). The programme gave viewers some reasons to be intolerant, but it dishonestly ignored the most serious issues of all.

The Lowe's sponsorship money was not going where they were advised it would go. Is it surprising that they withdrew?

I assume that nominations will soon be beginning for the Dhimmi and Anti-Dhimmi Awards, National (i.e. USA) and International, 2011.

I think a few new subcategories need to be created. In the past, the focus has been on individuals as individuals.

But I think that in America, in particular, there should be a subcategory for 'business or corporation'.

Lowes, if they refuse to give in to this despicable shakedown - an attempt to force them to pay for advertising on a show they have decided NOT to advertise on - should be a shoo-in for 'Anti-Dhimmi American Business of the Year, 2011'. Hertz, if they maintain and win their case against Muslim taxicab drivers who have been skiving off for 'prayers', should also get an honorable mention. And there may well be small business owners who deserve either commendation - for saying NO to Muslim demands - or condemnation - for cravenly caving in.

Any hotel chain that proudly hosts conferences by counter-jihad groups, whether in the USA or in countries such as Australia, should get due honour. (In Australia, the Q Society was able to find small and middle-range hotels willing to host Mr Spencer's seminars; all due respect to the owners or managers of those establishments, who ran a real risk of being attacked verbally and/ or physically, if their willingness to let Mr Spencer speak on their premises had gotten out).

I think there should be subcategories for journalists and / or media outlets (e.g. newspapers and radio stations), and for individual academics and for schools, colleges or universities.

Think of how the Oscars work.

*The* big awards are 'Best Actor' 'Best Actress' 'Best Picture'...but there are plenty of other, lesser awards, no less significant in their own way. And then, over against the Oscars, are the Golden Turkey Awards, and the Raspberries.

Think of the "Anti-Dhimmi' awards as equivalent to the Oscars. *The* big prize is the one given to the two individuals - in the USA and internationally - who have defied Islam/ Islamisation most publicly and effectively in 2011.

But then there could be the other categories, each an honour in its degree. Lowes might receive an award for 'Least Dhimmified/ Most Freedom-Loving American Business Corporation'.

Same deal with 'Dhimmi of the Year'. The individual resident in a non-Muslim country, that is, at least theoretically less threatened by the scimitar of Islam, who has exhibited the most public, craven and generally damaging display of grovelling pre-emptive submission or caving-in to Muslim demands, gets the Big Raspberry. But there are plenty of other entities, among educational establishments, media outlets, and in the world of business and finance, who deserve to be named and shamed as well: who get the rest of the Raspberries.

It's NOT a coincidence that all three suck-ups here are Democrats. Part of a pattern. One by now knows this or should know it.

In short, the Democratic Party in America has become a facilitator of Islamic supremacist designs, and under the guise of tolerance no less. Can't make up this kind of stupidity.

Again can be seen that truth is stranger than fiction. And this specific example of truth is a mortal danger to liberty, something which both major parties in America traditionally have prized, but which is now reduced to only one of these two political organizations (and the Republicans don't look too healthy here either). This in itself is damn sad---and telling.

Freedom requires certain things for freedom to continue. One of them is common sense. Another is the realization that freedom isn't free. And yet another is the understanding that one should not be so open-minded that one's brains fall out. Problematical right now.

Apologies for any cross posting.

Trio sentenced to 18 years' jail over terror plotBy court reporter Sarah Farnsworth, ABC Updated December 16, 2011, 11:39 pm
Three men who conspired to plan a terrorism attack on the Holsworthy Army base have been sentenced to 18 years in jail.

Last December a jury found Wissam Fattal, 35; Nayef El Sayed, 28; and Saney Aweys, 27, guilty of terrorism offences after a six-week trial in the Victorian Supreme Court.

Before sentencing began Friday, Fattal stood in the dock and yelled about hostilities in Afghanistan and Syria, forcing Justice Betty King to order his removal from the court.

As Fattal was led away he pointed vehemently towards the judge, calling out "corruption".

He did not return to the court even when his sentence was read out.

After the men were sentenced a woman cried out "Oh my God" and began sobbing loudly.

As Sayed was led away he said: "Allah gives us justice, not these courts."

The men, originally from Lebanon and Somalia, plotted a shooting at the Sydney Army base, intending to kill as many people as they could until they themselves were shot dead.

The court heard the intent of the attack was to advance Islam through violence.

Justice King called the plans "evil".

"A totally horrific event if it ever came to pass," she said.

But she described the plot, which took 10 months to plan, "amateurish".

"This was far from a sophisticated plan that was hatched," she said.

Surveillance

In 2009, Fattal travelled to New South Wales to conduct surveillance of the Holsworthy base. His visit was captured on CCTV.

But the court heard he carried no camera, no writing materials and no plans.

He was arrested by police on the same day on a separate assault charge.

The court heard all three men support Al Shabaab in Somalia and both Aweys and Fattal were prepared to train and fight for the terror group.

Justice King said because the men had not recanted their belief in jihad, they remained a danger to the community.

She added the men should hang their heads in shame for plotting against a country that had welcomed and nurtured them.

'Intolerant Muslim'

Justice King described Fattal as a simple man, but said his low intelligence did not make him any less dangerous.

She said the former champion kickboxer was a devout man with extremist views, adding that he was an "intolerant Muslim" who had a fervent belief in religious martyrdom.

Justice King told the court it was clear Fattal believed that Australia, its Government and its troops were all at war with Islam, and he considered all non-Muslims as infidels.

All three are held in protection and are likely to remain there.

For the past 989 days, Fattal has been kept in protection, mainly at the Melbourne Remand Centre, due to his behaviour.

He will not obey prison guards, tries to convert other prisoners, and it is considered a management problem.

The men must serve 13-and-a-half years before they are eligible for parole.

Democracy and consent of the governed demands recognition of the supremacy of man made law.

Hillary Clinton falsely says:

"there is no contradiction between having strong religious beliefs and having the freedom to exercise them and to speak about them and to even have good debates with others."

To freely exercise Islam is to expel non-Muslims from positions of power over Muslims.

What is it that we fear? I think it is this:

Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 367 US 1 (1961)

"The characteristics of a 'totalitarian dictatorship' [] are * * *"

Defending freedom and human rights for all can be ugly and imperfect. Labeling the enemy correctly necessarily compels effective follow-up action. Shaming alone is not enough.

Is the OIC's Islamic supremacist package-deal purely and exclusively spiritual stuff about a theoretical after-life? If not, then what? We would have to detail in proposed legislation each and every element of authoritative Islamic text that threatens our secular governmental institutions and its prime directive of preserving individual liberty, then introduce it with remedial measures for consideration. We would have to neuter the repulsive elements of Islam, at least as practiced in the US, and decouple it from the foreign agitators.

At a minimum we would have to sever the spiritual elements from the political elements. For example, we must be free to vilify anyone that would propose to introduce legislation to punish adulterers by stoning. Shaming criticism of Islam means shaming -- silencing -- criticism of any individual feature of Islam (or Islam-based governments), which is the single-issue campaign of the OIC . . . in America, for now.

Anybody know the names of the other 29 Congressmen who shigned the letter? So far, I've been unable to find any besides the three listed. I'd like to know if mine is one of them.
In a way, I guess we should be thankful it was "only" 32 who signed. Congress is so full of fools, crooks, dopes, and blowhards that I wouldn't have been surprised if there were 132 signers.

Well for heaven's sake, if the show gives such great bang for the advertising buck, let these Congressmen advertise on it.

So the government wants to tell you where to spend your advertising dollars? Maybe next they will tell you which car to buy, which brand of gas to buy, which neighborhood you can move into and which house you have to buy...they will tell you what you must study, where you will go to school and which job you can have....hey wait a minute!!!That sounds a lot like communism...

"Metro Detroit is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in United States and I’m proud of our diverse culture."

We would all like to believe in the myth of the moderate Muslim, but this footage from the Dearborn Arab Festival shows that Muslims behave as a cultural block. Remember, this is the community that Romney held up as an example of moderate Muslims:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EA4zr7xLyk

Add Hansen Clarke, Gary Peters and John Dingell to the list of fascists. What utter morons. The very idea that you can make a company pay to show its ads on a particular tv show is so much bullshit it is unbelievable those guys even have brains. This is America not whatever Nazi or Communist country you fucktards think it is.

Folks, if you don't have a Lowe's in your neighborhood, order something online from them for Hanukkah or Christmas.

Here's there website:

http://www.lowes.com/?cm_mmc=search_google-_-Brand%20Core-_-Core%20Terms%20Exact-_-lowes

Folks, if you don't have a Lowe's near you, order something from their website:

http://www.lowes.com/?cm_mmc=search_google-_-Brand%20Core-_-Core%20Terms%20Exact-_-lowes

Sorry for the double post!

Ali Sina makes an analogy between HIV and Islam:

There are people who are HIV positive but do not show any sign of AIDS. This does not mean HIV is harmless. You may have good resistance but someone else can catch this virus from you and get AIDS. Likewise most Muslims have good resistance to Islamic disease. They are infected by it but don’t show any sign of madness. However, they transmit this disease to others and to their children and millions of innocent people catch the disease of Islam and are transformed into monsters.

If I am HIV positive and sleep around, I am just an immoral person, but if I know I have HIV and still sleep around, I am a criminal.

So far you ["Shakila," a letter writer to Ali Sina] did not know that Islam is evil, but now you know. From now on it is criminal to call yourself a Muslim. I have more respect for the suicide bomber than I have for shameless deceivers such as Zuhdi Jasser, Irshad Manji, Tarik Fatah and others like them who denounce everything Islam teaches and say Islam is not this. They are deceiving the people.

How the hell do you demand someone buy ad space for a crappy program? These congressional clowns posture for votes, full well knowing they have no legal recourse constitutionally. This is cynical politics at its worst, but it spells out how ridiculous they get when praying to the alter of multiculturism.

I wonder if Mr. Lieu would show such indignation if sponsors decided to withdraw ads from 'Keeping Up with the Kardashians'? Bigotry against US citizens of Armenian heritage living in Ted's own state? Could the world survive?

I am sure that these Congressmen have our best interest at heart as in oil from the muslim lands.

US Representatives Hansen Clarke (D-Detroit), Gary Peters (D-Bloomfield Twp.) and John Dingell (D-Dearborn) were among 32 congressmen who authored a letter asking Lowe's chairman and chief executive to reconsider his advertising decision regarding "All-American Muslim."

WHO ARE THE OTHER 29?? Names and the States they represent..

For the voters in Michigan, remember these three names when they are up for reelection and vote their asses OUT! How DARE they try to interfere with a business decision of a private company. Voters too often forget that these Congressmen work for US; WE don't work for THEM!

Super well done to Lowe's, and I really hope they don't cave in - but why are *they* being the ones singled out by the supremacists and leftard enablers ?

Lowes Christmas gift ideas.

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15888&pc=JJCT207

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15888&pc=JJCT185

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15888&pc=JJCM005

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15889&pc=JJCT161

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15889&pc=JJCM126

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH121

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH111

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH087

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH115

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH098

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH116

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Product.aspx?cp=15833_15890&pc=JJCH112

http://jimmiejohnson.shop.sportstoday.com/Dept.aspx?cp=15833_24312

Maybe with a bit of luck all three Congressmen may have the good fortune (for us) to
be schooled by Ms Barnhardt of recent memory. Now there would be a video well worth
going viral. You could put that on pay for view ad I'd shellout the dough for the popcorn.

Lowe's pulled out support in response to customer dissatisfaction. It was a business decision which they are free to make. Obama and his cronies are doing what Hitler did before he became violent, an active campaign to "shame" and "humiliate" those opposed to Hitler's socialist party. We need to stop Obama from doing more damage to this country, vote in a new president who will reverse all the damage, and demand "change" back to Constitutional strength and to a Sharia-free country. It was not out of intolerance for Muslims that American object to the All-American Muslim show, it is out of intolerance of the supremacist ideology enforced by Sharia law.

Let's write to Lowe's (add/change, send, and pass it on):

To: customercare@lowes.com

Dear President of Lowe's:

I am glad that Lowe's pulled out support for the All-American Muslim show in response to customer dissatisfaction. It was a business decision which you are free to make. President Obama and his cronies are doing what Hitler did before he became violent, an active campaign to "shame" and "humiliate" those opposed to Hitler's socialist party. We need to stop Obama from doing more damage to this country, vote in a new president who will reverse all the damage, and demand "change" back to Constitutional strength and to a Sharia-free country. It was not out of intolerance for Muslims that American object to the All-American Muslim show, it is out of intolerance of the supremacist ideology enforced by Sharia law and of Mohammad's tagyya (lying to non-Muslims) embodied by the show. Muslims have every right to believe whatever they want in this country, but they do NOT have the right to enforce Sharia on anyone in the U.S. We have and favor Constitutional law in this country.

Thank you much,