U.K.: Gang of Muslim women who savagely beat non-Muslim woman let off because "they weren't used to drinking because they're Muslims"

There are many more examples of Muslims in Britain being granted immunity from normal laws and receiving numerous special privileges not available to the rest of the population. Scroll down to Removing the benefits and increasing the costs of being Muslim at http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2011/03/how-to-destroy-islam-non-violently.html

As Andy Choudary would say: "Only Muslims are innocent". Miss Page is guilty of two things; being white and a Kufar.

Love is in the air...

The really startling thing in this report is the expression "girl gang". These thugs were not "girls". They were grown women, older than their victim, who was herself old enough to hold a responsible job and mind her own business in public.

I can understand that a 15-year-old who sneaks an illegal drink really might not be accustomed to drinking and really might be too immature to predict the lowering of inhibition. But an adult in her mid-20s ought to understand the implications of drinking regardless of whether she is personally "accustomed" to it. Alcohol is never an excuse for behaviour performed while under its influence.

umm... where was the boyfriend?  No one would have blamed him for laying into the attackers - female or otherwise.

It's the judge who should be in jail over this one. What sane person could give such a ruling thats sets these women free.
Why are we always surprised when this favouring of the muslim happens in the west? It is because that our Lib/Con government are nothing more than apologist lefties.
Time to boot the problem (islam) out of our countries for ever.

So , how is this NOT a racial hate crime?

Imagine if the word was "muslim" instead of "white".

The UK is in serious trouble.

What happened with the boyfriend? Was he just standing by?

This is yet another appalling example of perverting the course of justice in the UK. Emma West is remanded in custody after verbally venting her frustration on immigrants, whilst seated on a tram with her son on her lap. It was started by an immigrant spitting on the floor in the vicinity of the child. A camera just happened to be around to record the episode - no doubt contrived by another immigrant! Emma was not violent - no blows were struck, she remained seated. Compare that to the above vicious assault and you will see that our justice system is not only not fit for purpose, it is positively corrupt.It is claimed that she is in custody 'for her own protection' following alleged death threats. Are the police prosecuting the issuers of such threats? No mention of that! Those alleged threats are far more serious than Emma's alleged offence!No way can Emma receive a fair trial, anyway, since the video of the episode went viral on U-Tube! Theresa May, Kenneth Clarke, David Camoron and all their privileged, dhimmi, Chamberlainesque, appeasing apologists are selling Britain out - and Camoron is about to get mugged in the EU by Merkozy and will return, waving a copy of The Beano ( Bullingdon Times ), declaring 'Fleeced in our time'! Pity they can't re-open Heston aerodrome to make his return more historically accurate.Britain is now truly broken! Camoron - SHAPE UP, OR SHIP OUT!

Anyone know if the judge was a Muslim ?

Solomani asked, "Where was her boyfriend"? If you'd watched the video, you'd see he was fighting these four hellions. But as soon as he'd turn and lash out at one of them, the other three would hover over Page and kick her. At times they would gang up on him. He couldn't cover all the bases. He's to be credited with probably saving Page's life. Watch the video. And while watching it, ask yourself why the judge isn't dismissed from the bench and locked up for derelection of responsibility, because he watched the same video.

A story like this can induce either an anger-laced incredulity....or a chuckle at the utter absurdity of the human condition.

When I first read it, I felt the former. Now, I choose the latter.

This British judge is a clueless dhimmi who - if there was any justice in the world - would someday soon be assaulted and viciously beaten by a teetotaler on a drunken binge.

"Do as I say, not as I do." That's the operating mantra of Islam and Muslims. "Don't accuse us of intolerance, bigotry, racism, misogyny, pedophilia, murder, and torture, or we’ll scream ‘hate speech’ and Islamophobia. We’re here to conquer, not to assimilate. And we’ve got your infidel ‘justice’ system on our side. Get used to it.”

Where Islam is there is no justice for the non-Muslim. The judge in this case should be removed from office and penalized for his behavior. The Muslim women should have been locked up. Instead, they are free (multi-culturalism) bragging and well on their way to doing it again. Are there not any non-Muslim women int the UK who could find them and exact a little "street justice"? Another example of a "peaceful Islam" at work. Disgusting.

From looking at the video I suspect that the boyfriend was too drunk to defend his girlfriend properly...coupled with the state brainwashed fear of hurting/offending "minorities." I also think that the muslim slime were not particulary drunk..if at all. Their religious/cultural based defence should not be allowed ....just as it would not be allowed of foreigners in the shithole where this scum were conceived ...by other equally repulsive vermin.......Islam has got to go...the UK is heading for civil war due to this unwanted religion...sorry....fascist ideology.

Further thought.

Miss Page said:

‘I honestly think they attacked me just because I am white. I can’t think of any other reason.’

Actually, although they did curse her as a 'white slag', I don't think it was her whiteness so much as her nonMuslimness that was the real object of their killing rage.

Had she been a black Caribbean Christian girl wearing a cross pendant, or a brown Hindu girl in a sari with a bindi on her forehead, or a Chinese girl, she'd likely have been targeted with just as much murderous savagery - for being non-Muslim. Whereas, had she been a white Bosniak or Albanian Muslim, blonde and blue-eyed but suitably be-hijabbed, I suspect she'd have been perfectly safe.

This case should go to appeal - we look to the CPS to do just that!

is the judge a idiot
im muslim who supports the salafi ideology
and even i think they should have gotten maximum jail sentence

If this is whites attacking a muslim for no reason it goes down as a hate crime & they will be in in jail for 10 years. Way to go judge, this is how civil wars start, when the general population lose all faith in their officials.

So now what's to prevent them from finishing the job?

As I always post, no one should be surprised to find that "hate crime" laws are not enforced equally across all ethnic and religious lines. They were never intended to be. They were, from the start, envisioned as a weapon to be used by leftists against the culture of the traditional West.

Maybe this is a time when Sharia should have been applied. I imagine it carries a pretty heavy penalty for drinking -- maybe 50 lashes or so. Also it would carry penalties for each of these muslimas being out in public without her owner, plus he would have to kill her for dishonoring him.

It's that demon rum...devils juice, fire water...the ruinous curse of many good men...Mahound was right in banning this trouble maker...There is a hadith that has Mahound and his gang beating a drunk with shoes and palm branches simply because he was drunk...According to sharia, each of these vicious Muslimahs are due for 80 public lashes...I would expect them to be hauled before a sharia court, found guilty and lashed in the public square...Of course I'm sure these woman would convince the sharia court that they were not drinking at all, and beat the woman because she was kuffar...The court will excuse them because there is no sharia penalty for beating, robbing, or killing kuffar...

Same old same old, Rule number 1 Muslims are never guilty, they are always innocent. Rule number 2 Muslims are always the victim, never the aggaressor.

Clearly this must have been the kuffars fault. Simply because of being a kuffar. In this case the Muslim women did nothing wrong, in the eyes of Islam.

Non-Muslims should leave those unstable countries at once for their own safety. The U.S. should cut off all funding to Islam until the killings have stopped. Or perhaps put 5 million it a bank ear marked Islam. Then every time a Muslim kills a kuffar remove 1 million from the fund.

(video) Sahih Bukhari Vol 8, Book 81, #771 "The Prophet lashed him because of drinking (alcohol)"
Allah forbidds to drink alcohol (haram)

http://schnellmann.org/bukhari--the-prophet-lashed-him-because-of-drinking-alcohol.html

Qur'an 5:90 "Wine, Intoxicants (alcohol) is a great sin"
2:219 "wine is a great sin"

Punishment in Bukhari
Sahih Bukhari, Book 81: Limits and Punishments set by Allah (Hudood)

Bukhari Vol. 8, Book 81, No. 764, 767 "The Prophet beat a drunk with palm-leaf stalks and shoes. And Abu Bakr [close companion of Muhammad & father of Aisha] gave (such a sinner) forty lashes."

fatwa No. 237 "What is the punishment for one who drinks alcohol....?"

When barbarism attacks civilization, it's as if children are attacking grownups. That's why, when a gang of Muslimas aged 24-28 beat up a 22-year old female member of a Western society, we might naturally say 'girls beat up woman.'

To follow Islam is to be the worst kind of child -- spoiled, ignorant, un-empathetic -- regardless of age.

thats england for you.

here in germany the PC has even a worse stance. today the killers !! of a 44 year old biological german man were set free by the appeal judge since they were only 19 and therefore only kids and muslims as well. if the killer had been a biological german and christian he would have gotten probably 10 years but....had the dead man be a muslim then probably a life sentences would have been the result .i mean i can´t quite understand the reasoning , they beat the man who was on his way home from work to death ,because he refused to give them 20 cents . i mean in germany you can go to jail for not paying a parking ticket in time !!! but if you are muslim then total freedom from the law is the result !!thats already dhimmitum , unbelievable. anyway in europe generally it is now forbidden to critize islam or jail is waiting !

europe is lost ....USA you better take good care or you end the same way.

Now you know why muslims and alcohol don’t mix. Since alcohol makes you lose all inhibitions, the muslim’s inner jihadi comes out. Alcohol makes that go after the first 1st kaffur they see. It’s just as bad as Friday night prayer where they get hopped up over the Koran and then are ready to do jihad against kaffurs. All muslim should be banned from any bar or club.

1. The video makes clear that the boyfriend was indeed in the middle of the fray. Looks like he got in a couple of punches to at least two of the attackers' heads.

But they kept coming, and he was overwhelmed by the four attackers.

2. Note this, after viewing the video:

"But he [the judge] said he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend, and handed the defendants a suspended sentence."

Unreasonable force?

What is the matter with that judge?

I do hope the girl has recourse to additional legal actions against her attackers.

Who turned on the spigot that has let in the flood of such "refugees?" Where is the spigot located? How do we turn off that spigot and bring those responsible to account?

For a start, does anyone have Judge Robert Brown's email address? I'd like to ask him not only why he didn't put these harpies in jail but why he didn't recommend their deportation back to Somalia following their sentence.

The other side of the British injustice system today:

"'Woman on a tram' to spend Christmas behind bars 'for her own protection' after court views video of alleged racist rant."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070647/Racist-woman-tram-spend-Christmas-bars-protection.html#ixzz1frcIPoXO

Muslim women not used to drinking walk free after attack on woman

A gang of Somalian women who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were "not used to being drunk" because they were Muslim.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8937856/Muslim-women-not-used-to-drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html

Muslim women not used to drinking walk free after attack on woman

A gang of Somalian women who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were "not used to being drunk" because they were Muslim.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8937856/Muslim-women-not-used-to-drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html

Re:

Ambaro Maxamed,
Ayan Maxamed,
Hibo Maxamed,
Ifrah Nur

These four Muslim women are not only racist scumbags, but kicking someone in the head while yelling "kill the white sl--!", plus the apparently premeditated targeting of the victim, altogether looks like attempted murder. There was certainly a clear attempt to kill Miss Page, and she may well have been killed had her boyfriend not defended her from the four assailants.

Re:
"Judge" Robert Brown

This incredibly stupid, immoral, perverse, treasonous scumbag should himself be prosecuted for helping these would-be killers.

I hope that Miss Page and Mr. Moore appeal this "decision", and don't let up until this gang of murderous thugs is either behind bars or deported, and this "judge" is appropriately punished for his totally illegal and unethical "decision."

This incident also highlights the need for people to learn self-defense.

Another major concern is the unjustifiably hostile attitude that some judges have toward legitimate attempts at self-defense.

As far as I'm concerned, if you are being attacked by four people who are stating that they are going to kill you and are engaging in possibly lethal actions like kicking you in the head, at that point the only sensible actions are either to escape if you can, or, if you can't, then stand and fight to, at minimum, disable the people who are attempting to kill you, including by using whatever weapons may be on hand (bricks, rocks, etc.), yelling and making as much noise as possible to alert others to help. You have no choice but to do so if you can't escape, your assailants won't stop, and you don't want to die. If, in your attempt to defend yourself, your would-be killer dies, that should not be held against you--the person who is rightly trying to defend herself or himself from a deadly attack.

"‘Even after the police came and they all ran away, one of them came running back to kick me in the head one last time."

The police let her do it. It's disgraceful. Police officers on the scene who allow these kinds of murderous assaults to continue are at minimum incompetent and should be fired.

p.s. dda,

Ignore the "reply to" above. I was initially going to reply to your comment on the anti-white vs anti-Non-Muslim motives. On that point I would note that the statements quoted only indicate an anti-white motive. Yet it is probable that, if there was an anti-Non-Muslim motive here, that the fact that the victim was white--and visibly so with Islamic head covering etc--was used as the primary means of reaching that assumption.

typo correction: "and visibly so without Islamic head covering etc"

On the issue of the conduct of the judge I will be writing to the Office for Judicial Complaints:

Office for Judicial Complaints
Steel House
11 Tothill Street
3rd Floor
3.01-3.03
London, SW1H 9LJ

On the issue of appealing against the sentence and the decision to not charge for racially aggravated assault, I will be writing to the CPS:

Keir Starmer QC
The Crown Prosecution Service
Rose Court
2 Southwark Bridge
London, SE1 9HS

I suggest all UK JWers do the same.

uk_infidel
Islam is not a religion, it's an organised crime syndicate.

The video doesn't lie....the Muslim women were on a seek and destroy mission....clearly the attack was unprovoked...Infidels should walk the streets in large numbers for better security...

These garbage Muslim women must have promised the judge one hell of a good time to get him to dismiss the charges. Maybe they promised to drink liquor before, during and after sex?!!

Her boyfriend was absolutely pathetic - watch the video.
Any decent boyfriend would knock these slugs unconscious
in no time - he was just standing there and pushing them around, absolutely pathetic, he's constantly bending and picking up his hoodie/sweater like that was the most important thing for him at that time, what a disgrace !

uk infidel, thanks for providing all those addresses.

What strikes me on reading the Daily Mail report is Hibo Maxamed's total absence of empathy or rempentance.

Speaking at her home, Hibo Maxamed said: "I’m not proud of it, it’s not something I want to talk about. I just want to get on with my life."

When asked if she wanted to apologise, she replied: "What, to the public? I really don’t care."

Actually she does owe an apology to the British public, as crimes of this nature are considered to be committed against the whole community. Gravenimage touched on that by pointing out that a group of innocent autistic children have now lost their teacher. Lewis Moore also has to live with a traumatised woman while dealing with his own traumas, and the public purse has to fund counselling.

But far more than that, Hibo Maxamed and her kinswomen owe the apology to Rhea Page. If they still don't understand this, they haven't learned anything worthwhile from their experience in the lawcourts. Yes, I'm glad they now owe us 450 hours of voluntary work. But how does this compare with the hours of work that Rhea Page has lost?

The assailants apparently feel victimised by the fact that the "white slag" hit back. They don't seem to have noticed that, even if the attack had stopped in the instant Lewis Moore struck out, what they had done before that moment should have been enough to condemn them.

I don't believe these immature women are Muslims in any meaningful sense. They don't wear the hijab and they drink alcohol. I doubt they have ever heard of the Pact of Omar. Yet they do seem to have imbibed its spirit.

A dhimmi forfeits protection if he defends himself against a Muslim attack.

It's the good luck of Miss Page and Mr Moore that there is the video. Or they might very well have been put behind bars - not suspended - for a racist hate crime.

I wrote the 1:59 am comment before I'd seen any video -- didn't know there was video till WhupTdu pointed it out to me. I advise people to watch the video:

http://bcove.me/boiukbqq

You'll get very angry at the three attackers. A judge who sees that video and lets those attackers off without a severe sentence deserves to be fired and disbarred from the legal profession.

The attackers, at least in the video, appear to be black, and they apparently called the victim white, not kafir, or some religious term, so this may have been as much or more a racial attack than a religious attack.

You are too hard on him, I think. He punched one of them out. I too think he should have kicked the crap out of the other two when they kept coming back and back at the girlfriend on the ground. But I think you underestimate the challenge he was facing. He had four things to attend to simultaneously: three surprise attackers all at once, and an injured girlfriend on the ground. He could well have had several motives to keep things from escalating if possible. He may have felt some ingrained habitual restraint as a male, against using violence on females. Further, if you escalate without being certain you can disable all three of the attacking women at once in short order, then you risk leaving an opening for the one or two you don't quickly stop to do serious damage to the girlfriend injured on the ground. If you are not an experienced fighter, it could be dangerous for the girlfriend injured on the ground if you escalated the fight. The attacking women were good-sized, not petite at all. He may also have been concerned about the potential to severely injure or accidentally kill one of the attackers. If you knock someone unconscious and they hit the sidewalk, they may never get up.

Looking at the video, I don't think we can judge the boyfriend. He was like a hockey player who has to play offense and goalie simultaneously, an often impossible task. He has to stick by his girlfriend to keep her from getting attacked, but he has to go on the offense at the same time to put down the attackers. An experienced fighter could probably have handled it better, but he did ok.

Okay, watched it yet again. At first there were only three, but then there were four attackers.

The boyfriend hesitated too long at first before intervening. When the four kept coming on time and again to attack the girl, he should have thrown a few more punches than he did. But I still don't judge him. He threw several good punches and did what he could in a very difficult situation he probably had no preparation for.

Those girls should go away for a long time. That judge should be severely punished himself.

The judge should be bashed as Miss Page was.
If I was Miss Page I will buy a gun, drink a bottle of alcohol - drugs and go and KILL a few of them. Don't forget also to wear a full burda that is the key of success it seems.

Then if I get caught I will blame it on been under the influence of drugs and psychological distress.

Now I know why justices in England still wear wigs. They wear them to disguise an intromittant shaped cranium.

Let’s see… As you’re not so average American. I absolutely blame the boyfriend for the severity of the attack. If he would have been more worried about protecting his girlfriend and not keeping his jacket on his left arm they would not have had the chance to get to her as freely. I watched the video several times. There were 3 women attackers at first. The ticker was at 10 seconds when the attack started. They attacked for 5 seconds with the boyfriend in the fray. Time stamp 15 seconds. At 16 seconds he hits an attacker. He then watches for another 8 seconds before he moves in again. He finally starts to really fight and falls down at the 37 second mark. Now he has his jacket in the crook of his left arm up until this time. He gets back up at the 40 second mark at about the 48 second mark he knocks one of the women down. He dropped his jacket at about the 39 second mark. At the 59 second mark he picks his jacket back up! His girlfriend keeps getting attacked up till the 66 second mark before he resumes his retaliation. It is at the 77 second mark that the fourth woman walks up from the right hand side of the street out of camera range. There is no fighting going on until the 80 second mark. At that mark three of the women are attacking. One is sitting on the sidewalk. At 82 seconds he falls down. At 90 seconds he is back on his feet and finally attacking in earnest. He attacks up till the 99 second mark. But!! He has his jacket in the crook of his left arm again which renders that arm basically useless. At the 111 second mark he reaches down for his girlfriend. He was doing nothing constructive for 12 seconds other than walk around. At 113 second mark an attacker kicks the girlfriend. The police show up at the 120 second mark. So the question was did the boyfriend do all he could. No. Seconds are like hours in an attack. Drop the damn jacket and fight.
As far as the punishment the attackers got. Payback is a MF. And none of those women attackers were amazons! All in all he is a dumbass. Jeez! Throw the jacket down dude and fight!
Ohh. and one more thing.. If you are getting attacked like that you have the right to use deadly force. Your life is in danger. Kill them and move on with your life.

I've done a bit of googling, and it seems the British judiciary is usually lenient with drunken brawls. Basically, people have been bashed up every weekend ever since the hours for sale of alcohol were extended, and nobody ever goes to jail.

So the leniency to the Maxamed gang was probably not about race, religion, fear of Islamic reprisals or being PC about immigrant crime. It was simply about being PC about light sentencing for assault.

Yes, it's a ludicrous contrast that Emma West was locked away for six months for a purely verbal offence. If only she'd thrown a few punches on that tram, she too would have been let off on a warning. Her rant really was despicable, and maybe a stiff cash fine would have taught her a lesson, leaving space in our overcrowded jails for people who are actually violent.

The real lessons to be learned here seem to be: (1) Return to restricting alcohol sales - Britain is not mature enough handle unrestricted drinking; (2) Continue with video surveillance, since we apparently need it; (3) Maintain a sense of proportion; (4) Take all assaults more seriously. I actually agree that community service is more appropriate than incarceration for first offenders, but how meaningless is a sentence of only twenty working days?

I don't blame Lewis Moore. He knew he would have to demonstrate in a court of law that he had used the minimum necessary force. He actually used less than the "necessary", since the assailants did not give up. However, if he had succeeded in driving them off, he would probably have been convicted of excessive force. He had to be very careful not to do any actual harm to the assailants. However, another lesson we can learn is (5) the laws that prevent us standing up for ourselves are ridiculous.

I also checked out Ambaro Maxamed's Facebook account. It seems she was born in Sweden. Not sure what this means overall (perhaps that (6) we should get ourselves out of the EU!), but it does mean she didn't grow up in Somalia.

People

I have just waded through the 1000+ comments at the Daily Mail article.

It was most instructive.

And what was particularly interesting was the number of Muslims who posted comments, claiming to be sooo shocked! shocked!, and proclaiming earnestly that Islam doesn't condone this kind of mob violence or attacks on 'innocent people'...ROFLMAO...nobody asks them to define 'innocent'....they can tell that one to the Copts, the Hindus, the Indonesian Christians, the Assyrian Christians, the Nigerian Christians...

I can only conclude that, sensing the mood of the assembled kuffar growing less accommodating, the Muslims are rushing to try to put people back to sleep

Where is my comment from yesterday? Don't tell me Jihad Watch deleted it in case it gave offence to those lovely Muslims.

Her boyfriend needs to be trained in Aikido.

Some people think this was just a drunken brawl. Drunken brawl implies a bunch of hooligans all fairly equally culpable fight for no justifiable reason. The evidence suggests that this was not the case. Brawl isn't really the word you use when a group of people attack one person, with no provocation. There is no evidence of any provocation, and there is no evidence that the victims used excessive force in trying to defend themselves.

There is also no evidence, from what I've seen, that the attackers were all intoxicated, as they claimed. I would want to see blood alcohol levels reported for each of them in order to assess this claim. Yet if they were intoxicated, then they should have been charged for that as well (drunk and disorderly, etc.), not just for the extended assault where they attempted to cause the maximum damage to the victim.

To kick someone in the head, when you have no weapons and it is just physical combat, is to use the maximum amount of percussive force that you have against the most vulnerable and vital part of the person you are striking. A kick delivers far more force than a punch. A single kick to the head, not even with full force, can cause death either immediately or days later due to hemorrhaging of the brain. The maximum force you can generate with a kick to someone's head is when you are standing up and their head is on or near the ground (think of a soccer ball). That's exactly what these young women did to the victim in this case, and they did so deliberately, repeatedly, persistently, and they continued to do so even when the police were present.

There is no reason to suppose that these four women did not know how much damage a kick in the head can do. Someone who is just trying to rough you up is probably not going to kick you in the head, certainly not repeatedly, and certainly not when you are on the ground and they are standing--the position where they can get maximum leverage and force. Someone who kicks you in the head when you are on the ground is either trying to kill or permanently disable you and destroy your life, or is out of control and doesn't care if you die or if your life is destroyed due to massive injury to the brain. The idea that someone can intentionally kick someone else in the head and not know that this action could kill or permanently disable the victim is simply not plausible. These women knew what they were doing, the action was prepared in advance, they announced their intention to murder the victim, and throughout the episode they acted exactly like they wanted to murder the victim and did not stop until the police finally, reluctantly, stopped them from doing so. Had the victim's boyfriend not defended her, and had the police arrived any later, the victim could easily have been killed.

I would not at all be surprised if this victim has suffered, and continues to suffer, from brain injuries from the physical force of the kicks, besides the emotional trauma of the event which persists.

I finally had a chance to watch the video. Several things struck me:

When the ambulance arrives, one of the attackers was able to get close enough to the victim to kick her again *by going up to the ambulance*. I don't know what she said, but my guess is she posed as a concerned passerby, *rather than one of the assailants*. This is why the EMTs initially seem unconcerned with her close presence.

Moreover, the assailants *continue* to prevent the EMTs from treating the victim. This may have led to her further injury—it *might even have led to her death*.

The judge didn't even *mention* that aspect of it.

By the way, I don't blame the boyfriend, either. How many of us would do better if suddenly attacked on a dark street by a horde of Muslim thugs? Some of us would do better, no doubt—and likely many of us considerably worse.

I put the blame where it belongs—on these vicious Muslimahs, and on the dhimmi courts for sending the message that you can get away with such savagery in Britain today with *very few consequences*.

This one's for Rhea Page. http://bit.ly/u4i3nC

reply @ toastandmarmalade [i]From looking at the video I suspect that the boyfriend was too drunk to defend his girlfriend properly...coupled with the state brainwashed fear of hurting/offending "minorities."[/i]

No excuse.  Agree with Łukasz Lech and Tom Bennett on this.  Not to "toot my own horn" if anybody, let alone WOMEN, attacked my wife I would be hitting so hard the "they keep coming" and "your outnumbered" situation would be a non-issue as each in turn wouldn't recover.  Pound for pound a man is significantly stronger than a women even without training.  That situation is no time for half measures or concerns about self-preservation... would happily go to gaol for it as well.

Having said that A) He was surprised and B) outnumbered and C) possibly drunk?  So credit to him for doing anything at all.  Guys just need to be mentally prepared ahead of time that if X happens you will do Y so you don't have to think when X does happen you just do Y.  No martial arts or combat training is required to have this type of protective attitude.  Also, its not his fault, blame still lies with the attackers and the judge.

Regarding self-defence bias in the UK.   I tend to think the USA has the right idea with their 2nd amendment (and of course the wonderful 1st amendment).  The US courts tend to make more sense in cases of self-defence.  Most recent article I read a guy caught someone stealing his TV and XBOX, he confronted him, thief pulled a knife, guy takes the knife and stabs the thief with it.  Thief in hospital no charges laid against the home owner.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/114555-Thief-Attempts-to-Steal-Xbox-360-Instigates-Knife-Fight-Loses

That's reasonable - no charges laid, thief got what he deserved.