Iran to continue nuke program despite new sanctions

The toothless response from the West has not deterred the mullahs. So what now? The Europeans want to negotiate. They will do anything to avoid the war the Iranians are itching to provoke. And certainly another Wilsonian adventure would be as misguided and foredoomed as the last two. Still, something must be done. Iranian nuclear scientists should be careful getting into their cars. But not all that careful. "Iran to continue nuke program despite new sanctions," from MSNBC.com, January 23:

Updated at 12:30 p.m. ET: Hours after the European Union imposes an oil embargo and sanctions on Iran's central bank, France, Britain and Germany say they are willing to negotiate with Iran if it is ready to talk seriously about its nuclear program.

"We call on Iran's leadership immediately to suspend its sensitive nuclear activities and abide fully by its international obligations," the European countries say in a joint statement. "Until Iran comes to the table, we will be united behind strong measures to undermine the regime's ability to fund its nuclear program."

In response, the offices of Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issues the following statement, according to NBC News:

"We welcome today's decision by the European Union to ban imports of Iranian crude oil and petroleum products, freeze the assets of the Iranian central bank, and take additional action against Iran's energy, financial, and transport sectors."

Updated at 12 p.m. ET: Iran says a European Union decision Monday to impose new sanctions over its nuclear program is "psychological warfare," Reuters reports.

"... Imposing economic sanctions is illogical and unfair but will not stop our nation from obtaining its rights," Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast is quoted as saying by state television, referring to Iran's nuclear energy ambitions.

Updated at 11 a.m. ET: Russia's Foreign Ministry says the European Union was wrong to impose an oil embargo on Iran over its controversial nuclear program, The Associated Press reports.

"It's apparent that in this case there is open pressure and diktat, aimed at 'punishing' Iran for uncooperative behavior. This is a deeply mistaken policy, as we have told our European partners more than once. Under pressure of this sort, Iran will not make any concessions or any corrections to its policies," the ministry says.

Updated at 9:45 a.m. ET: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised a European Union decision to place sanctions on Iranian oil exports, Reuters reports. "I think this is a step in the right direction," Netanyahu said at a meeting of his Likud faction in parliament. "For now, it is impossible to know what the result of these sanctions will be. Heavy and swift pressure is needed on Iran and the sanctions must be evaluated according to their results."...

| 9 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

9 Comments

Iran to continue nuke program despite new sanctions
............................

And no one here is surprised...

Why am I not surprised? They will stall, lie, cheat and steal, until to get their murderous "Allah Bomb". The West, the UN, the EU, the UK, the USA, all be damned, they want that Bomb. Nothing to be done, but to keep up pressure on the mullahs until they scream "Allah-uncle". I fear it's going to be messy, unless 'saved' by Persian Spring. Either that or their collapsing currency start fanning a Zimbabwean-sized inflation. Otherwise... only Allah knows. ;-)

All mouth and no trousers. Regardless of the posturing of British naval forces building up in the Gulf, one thing for sure is that the MoD top brass are praying the Iranians don't send out a rowing boat to arrest the fleet.

You mean to say that the forces of justice and peace who overthrew the evil, evil Muhammad Riza Shah Pahlavi won't listen to an EmCee PeeCee Social Democratic judge f back in 1979 rom Belgium?

Shouldn't we worry more about the nukes Pakistan already has than the nukes Iran doesn't have but apparently wants?

If not, why not?

Answer to question #1:

No, because Pakistan already has nukes. Having anymore in the region (Iran) would only exacerbate things.
_______________________________________

Answer to question #2:

Because the Heads of State of Pakistan aren't calling to "wipe Israel off the map", for starters.

What are the odds of civil war in Iran--the human Islamic drones versus the Awakened Ones? Is anyone awake in Iran? Is there an underground like the White Rose organization in Nazi Germany? There must be someone there who escaped the matrix. How can we help them?

Pres. Obama has claimed that he's pursued a "smart" sanctions policy. Which is smarter, more targeted, and more effective? Bank and oil sanctions or killing their nuclear scientists?

If you're a logical human rights advocate (a rare commodity I'm sure), then you would conclude that it's far more surgical and precise to pick off their scientists rather than even the most tightly tailored sanctions regime.

The EU decision is massive! We've got Iran over a barrel now! :))

Clowns!

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter