Even Hillary Clinton has acknowledged that the Iranians want a bomb. They have already made their genocidal dreams abundantly clear. This nuclear scientist was part of a program that clearly is aspiring to murder of millions. Taking him out could have saved millions of lives.
"Santorum: US wrong to condemn Iran scientist death," by Thomas Beaumont in the Associated Press, January 14 (thanks to Wimpy):
GREENVILLE, S.C.—Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said Saturday the U.S. was wrong to condemn the killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist this week.The Obama administration's public posture on the death Wednesday of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan does not reflect the hard line Santorum supports in keeping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, the former Pennsylvania senator said while campaigning in conservative upstate South Carolina.
"Our country condemned it. My feeling is we should have kept our mouth shut," Santorum told about 200 people packed into a popular breakfast diner in Greenville....
And while Santorum stresses values issues, he has also argued for a tough stand on Iran's nuclear capability. Responding to a question in Greenville, he said he supports missile strikes to stop its nuclear program, if Iran refuses to submit to inspections.
"If these are people who are developing a weapon to be used to either destroy the state of Israel or to spread terror -- a reign of terror -- around the world, we shouldn't be sitting on the sidelines and letting it happen," he said. "They cannot have a nuclear weapon, because you, in Greenville, will not be safe."...
"No comment" might be the best... or a pro-forma condemnation. Either is fine by me **as long as the next targets are being identified and pursued....**
Then we can issue more "no comments" or pro-forma condemnations.
War IS deceit after all..... (Note - I am not pretending to be a holy founder of a peaceful "religion" when I point that out...
Last time Jihad Watchers!
As you may know, Shia Islam is lacking in comparison to Sunni Islam.
Sunnis have more followers, Sunnis have more published literature, and are more influential.
Shia have barely any works of Tafsir on the Qur'an, Hadeeth books, Islamic law books etc. in general, not to mention in English...
Until I found a website that has those resources.
Shia Hadeeth
Shia Tafsir
Shia Islamic law
This is an invaluable collection to English speakers who don't know much about Shia Islam, as well as Arabic speakers who don't care to spend 150.00$ on one collection of books.
Here is an excerpt from Kitab al-jihad:
"[س من يجاهد من] الكفار على ضربين:
1 - ضرب يقاتلون إلى أن يسلموا أو يقتلوا أو يقبلوا الجزية.
وهم ثلاث فرق: اليهود، والنصارى، والمجوس.
2 - والآخر لا يقبل منهم الجزية، ويقاتلون حتى يسلموا أو يقتلوا: وهم كل من عدا الثلاث الفرق المذكورين.
[The ones against whom one does jihad from] the kuffar are of two types:
1 – The type that are fought against until they accept Islam, or until they are killed, or until they accept the jizya.
And they are three groups: the Jews, the Christians, and the Zoroastrians.
2 – The others from whom the jizya is not accepted. They are fought until they accept Islam or until they are killed. And they are everyone apart from the three mentioned groups."
Another reason why Santorum is the best candidate!.
Thanks for the post Smredneck. Atheists feel that they are not involved in the War for Civilization and will be left alone should the Muslims win. Haha.
We're not talkng about your run of the mill innocuos scientist, we're talking about evil henchmen here. Read this great article from the Sydney Morning Herald http://www.j.mp/xtZ2Td
Obama's incalculably great and catastrophic failure in checking iran's maniacal drive to create nuclear bomb factories will assuredly leave America and the world doomed, with a future devoid of a chance to achieving national security for all of perpetuity. It will be irreversible, always tending downwards , spiraling towards a cataclysmic armageddon. Even before the question of genocide is reluctantly accepted, the cost of attempting to protect our cities and people will be ruinous financially and leave our citizenry , children and women, in a constant state of insecurity and justifiable fear. All the think tanks in the world have as of yet not been able to assess the total sum of effects and costs for the never ending islamic republics hoarding and development of nukes. Let the cries of humanity from the not to distant future not be futilely ignored or denied.
Obama is not sufficiently afraid of islamic nukes, this to the unprecedented detriment our future.
The Sydney Morning Herald's web site is http://www.smh.com.au/. Where your URL goes is anyone's guess.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Obama favors Iran armed with nuclear weapons.
I actually think that the US is lying about the condemnation. We are up to our eyeballs in these assinations but are denying any association or comments. As long as the job's getting done, I don't really care.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:22:02:29:00 I wanna change subjects now because-- foreign policy was-- Speaker Gingrich caused something of a stir overnight in the Middle East with comments he made in interview with the Jewish channel in which he called the Palestinians an invented people.
Speaker Newt Gingrich: 22:04:50:00 Somebody oughta have the courage to tell the truth: These people are terrorists.
Governor Mitt Romney: 22:05:51:00 They-- Israel does not want us to make it more difficult for them to sit down with the Palestinian (terrorists - wj).
Governor Mitt Romney: 22:06:03:00 --and the-- and the United States of America should not jump ahead of Bibi Netanyahu and say something that makes it more difficult for him to-- to do his job (i.e., negotiate with the terrorists - wj).
Romney: 22:07:30:00 If-- if-- if-- if Bibi Netanyahu wants to say what you said, let him say it. But our ally, b-- the-- the people of Israel, should be able to take their own positions and not have us negotiate (with the terrorists - wj) for them.
Romney: 22:08:29:00 And I'm president of the United States, I will exercise sobriety, care, stability. And make sure that in a setting like this, anything I say that can affect a place with-- with rockets going in, with people dying, I don't do anything that would harm that-- that ("peace"? - wj) process.
SENATOR RICK SANTORUM: 22:11:50:00 If I can finish my s-- comment, I'll get to that, George. (LAUGHTER) That-- that we-- we have an ally here that we have to work closely with. And I think Mitt's point was-- was the correct one. We need to be working with the Israelis to find out, you know what? Is this a wise thing for us to do, to step forward and to engage this issue? Maybe it is.
22:12:10:00 My guess is, at this point in time, it's not. Not that we shouldn't tell the truth, but we should be talking to our allies. It's their fight....
("It's their fight?" It's not our fight?)
To be fair, Santorum continued: ....And I'm-- I-- I've been out here very publicly-- that the Israelis have the right to determine what happens in their land. And all of Israel, including the quote-- you know, West Bank, is Israeli land.
(Why then did he agree with Romney? Why did Santorum join Romney in piling on Gingrich?)
Bottom line: Santorum, Gingrich and Romney would all be more realistic than Obama respecting what to do with Iran as long as it's run by religious zealots. But regarding Ron Paul, it's disconcerting to note that this utterly clueless man could be worse than Obama on this matter and related matters. Paul is actually to the left of Obama on Islam. Exceedingly difficult to do to be sure, but Paul has somehow, with his profound ignorance of Islam, "succeeded" here.
BTW: Saudi Arabia is no enthusiast of the Iranian stealth atomic program either:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-saudis-iran
"Al-Jubeir recalled the King's frequent exhortations to the US to attack Iran and so put an end to its nuclear weapons program. "He told you to cut off the head of the snake," he recalled to the Charge', adding that working with the US to roll back Iranian influence in Iraq is a strategic priority for the King and his government."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/150519
The best response to these unfortunate accidents that keep on happening inside Iran, is...silence.
Deep, dark silence.
Let the Mohammedans sweat.
Obama likes the "Iranian" mullahs.
He has been sucking up to them since day one.
He's acting in the grand tradition of Jimmy the dhimmi Carter.
Hi Meryl Petkoff,
Even if the scientist who was assassinated could somehow be proven only a "run of the mill innocuous scientist," his work on the Iranian nuclear bomb would still justify the U.S. or any sane nation in killing him, I think. At this point it's not necessary to show he's an evil "henchman" to justify his assassination. It's enough to see that his work could easily lead to the deaths of millions.
That is a pretty good article, Meryl...
Obama likes the "Iranian" mullahs.
Well, that is not obvious,or terribly relevant, but he certainly respects them.
He sees in them one of the tools of history that contributes directly, or indirectly, to the demise of the West and gradual emergence of the New World Order where Western civilization will play no greater, or rather lesser, role than other contenders and is doomed to disappear swamped by billions of aliens settling in its lands.
Obama believes in inevitability of such development brought about by "iron laws of history" and wants to stand on the right side of history. In the meantime he recognizes that at this point in time mullahs are doing (for whatever reasons)their share of assault against the West and he will hold back American reaction as long as possible without revealing his treason.
He's acting in the grand tradition of Jimmy the dhimmi Carter.
Well, Jimmy C. is an idiot. Obama is a clever maniac.
Don't worry, Mahdi will appear and straighten this mess out...
Why do we assume it was someone other than the Iranian government themselves? Perhaps this scientist was failing to do what was needed or the Iranians are looking to cause their own chaos and blame Israel/USA?
Does Obama really think we can apologizing our way out of Muslim terrorism?
Yes & that is his problem.
Islam, the religion of peace sees that as weakness.
Israel's problem is our problem & the problem of the civilized world !
I was writing flippantly.
I certainly don't disagree with you.
I know it very well, Joe.
Still, I detest the man so much that it is difficult for me to restrain myself. Take care, my friend.
MOSSAD