UK: Man gets year in prison for posting material "offensive to the Islamic faith" in his front window

Is England Saudi Arabia now? Is Sharia in effect? Is it now illegal to post material "offensive to the Islamic faith" in a window? If Conway had posted material "offensive to the Christian faith," would he have been arrested or jailed? Who decides what is offensive?

I haven't seen what Conway posted, and I do not support the BNP or any group with race-based policies or any truck with antisemitism, but this is a free speech issue. His political views are as irrelevant as his marijuana possession: he got the year in jail for the material on Islam, and another three months for the cannabis.

Unless what he posted in his window was calling for violence or genocide, it shouldn't matter how offensive it may have been to any group or individual. Clearly there is no more freedom of speech regarding Islam in Britain; under the guise of "hate speech" laws, Sharia blasphemy laws have become the law of the land. The arbiters of what constitutes "offensive" material control the discourse, and no dissent is allowed. This is the road to tyranny.

"Gainsborough man jailed over anti-Islam images in his flat window," from This Is Lincolnshire, March 9 (thanks to Ima):

A GAINSBOROUGH man who plastered his front window with vile anti-Islamic hate literature has been jailed for a year.

Darren Conway, a self-confessed supporter of right-wing organisations, was given a 12-months' sentence at Lincoln Crown Court.

The court was told on Tuesday that carer Conway had covered the front window of his ground floor flat in Heaton Street in Gainsborough with 17 photographs and posters.

Many were offensive – attacking both the prophet Mohammed and the Muslim religion.

Conway, 44, had denied displaying the religiously aggravated hate material on April 16 last year.

But he was convicted following a short trial earlier this year, when sentencing was postponed for reports to be prepared.

Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate custodial sentence."

Conway was also given a three-month concurrent jail sentence – to run alongside the longer term – after admitting unlawful production of cannabis.

Sixteen cannabis plants were found growing in his home when police visited to investigate the hate crime.

Christopher Lowe, prosecuting, said that Conway, who admitted to supporting both the BNP and the English Defence League, was caught after a member of the public complained to police.

"Later that day police attended the premises and found 17 posters and images in the front window in full public view," said Mr Lowe.

"The majority of the displayed posters and images were undoubtedly offensive to the Islamic faith.

"Conway was arrested at the scene and taken into police custody.

"He appeared to make out that those posters were, more or less, an opportunity to get back at his landlord.

"He was trying to justify them on a political and religious basis.

"In the back room was found a small grow of cannabis plants. Sixteen plants were growing under heated lamps."...

| 39 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

39 Comments

| Leave a comment

A year in prison for some anti-Islam posters, and 3 months for growing cannabis - sounds about right for modern Britain.

The concept of freedom of speech is disappearing in the nation of the United Kingdom. We must not stop the fight to get freedom. In Tunisia again there has been clashes with the Islamist

Their concerns mirror those of secularists and Western diplomats across the region, but they are especially poignant in Tunisia. Not only was Tunisia the starting point of last year’s Arab revolts, but it had one of the most settled secular traditions in the region and perhaps the best prospects for realizing a liberal democracy.

Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/03/10/even-in-tunisia-islamist-rattle-liberals/#ixzz1ojCMduHj

Youssef

Plus thank you Jihad watch for the work you have done in this website. Excellent!

It would be interesting to see a clear photograph of the material Conway posted. The court records may eventually emerge, or we'll have to wait 'till he's released to hear his side of the story. However, as you say Mr Spencer, it does not bode well if one cannot even protest from the privacy of your living quarters. I see plenty of things I find offensive out in public view, but I'd never go squealing to the authorities like a big wus.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate custodial sentence."

Funny that, judges like this one don't say the same about radical izlumic clerics like Anjem Choudary,Abu Hamza al Masri and their ilk when they openly preach hatred, mayhem and murder on the streets of the U.K.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087734/Abu-Qatada-deportation-Human-rights-mean-terror-cleric-CANNOT-sent-Jordan.html#comments

I just took a look at the "This is Lincolnshire" website and read the article and the comments on it. They were about 90% in support of Conway and critical of the judge and of the double standards of British courts. Here's one comment that gives some idea of what was on Conway's posters:

“Have any of you seen these pictures?? I have! So has my wife (who often walked past this house with my 2 young children). Surely pictures of people who have been tortured and beheaded is offensive!!??”

So apparently at least some of the pictures were of Moslem atrocities. I can see that such pictures might be upsetting to sensitive souls. But surely they're not offensive to Moslems; Moslems usually delight in photos of mutilated unbelievers, apostates, and disobedient wives.

There has been a dramatic increase in hate crime prosecutions since 2006 in the UK. Apparently some 13,276 people came before the UK courts for such crimes in 2010-11. The Crown Prosecution Service said many had involved assaults or verbal abuse. Note you can now get prosecuted and go to jail for "verbal abuse". Apparently at what point does freedom of expression become verbal abuse in the UK that can find you behind bars or does it matter who it is directed at, the prosecution rate is at 80 percent? The UK is clearly lost to an ever increasing political correctness in a once proud country that has lost its way, and fails to protect its culture. It is allowing sharia courts everywhere and it bends to the aggressive Islamist like Anjem Choudary at every turn.

In the end what Western Country will defend its culture,its laws, it foundations against the ever increasing threat that is the not so stealth jihad anymore in the EU Countries?

America needs to learn from what is happening to Eurabia day after day over the past 35 years.

I'm tempted to put a sign in my window that says I am "offended" by the arrogance of Islamic supremacism and the Qur'anic suras which say to abuse non-Muslim until they "feel subdued" and women are merely fields to be (sexually) plowed as the husband sees fit and that Jews and Christians are pigs and dogs.

I guess that is pigs and apes.

We need solidarity. The Muslim "world" is being courted by Obama. Maybe it is time U.S. citizens courts the Jewish "world" and the Christian "world" and the Buddist "world" and the Hindu "world" and the non-Muslim "world."

In the Ummah Kalifate

Possession of Cannibis - 3 months
Offending Islam - 12 months

I'm not a White, but had I been living in Britain, I'd support the BNP, despite their apparently not wanting the membership of people like me. Reason is simple - I'll support anybody who wants to show Mohammedans their place. As it is, anyone who insults Islam or Muslims is called racist anyway, regardless of whether or not he shares the same race as any group of Muslims.

Displaying porcelain pigs in your window will attract the attention of the Shariah-enforcing dhimmi British police:

POLICE are understood to have confiscated a collection of porcelain pigs from the front window of a woman's house in the same road as Leicester's main mosque following a complaint from local Muslims that the display was offensive.

Nancy Bennett, a 49-year-old foster mother from the Highfields area of Leicester, said the complaint about the pigs was made after she went to the police to report harassment. She has alleged that she has been targeted by local youths since the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, when she decorated her house with red, white and blue bunting. It is understood that the pigs were displayed alongside a quote from the Koran which said: "Let there be no coercion in religion."

A spokesman for Leicestershire Police said it was investigating the matter and that a file would be submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service, which would take the final decision on whether to press charges under the Public Order Act.

Leicester Federation of Muslim Organisations spokes-man Yaqub Khan said that more than 1,000 worshippers attending weekly Friday prayers at the nearby mosque passed the collection of pigs. He said that Mrs Bennett was aware of the potential for offence to be caused - that the pig is mentioned as being "unclean" in the Koran, and is regarded as an offensive animal by Muslims, who are forbidden from eating it.

Mrs Bennett said: "I arrived home to find police about to break into my house. They had got a warrant. They said they had had complaints about the pigs from neighbours. They considered it was a public order matter and took about 17 of them. I have been told not to replace them. I am sure I am not the only person in Britain who collects ceramic pigs." http://www.independent.co.uk/news/police-intervene-in-battle-of-offensive-china-pigs-1157337.html

I'm not a White, but had I been living in Britain, I'd support the BNP, despite their apparently not wanting the membership of people like me. Reason is simple - I'll support anybody who wants to show Mohammedans their place.

That's the bottom line. Aren't we supposed to be fearless in the face of the "Leftists" and the PC who are trying to dictate public discourse on the problem of Islam? (e.g., as Spencer recently promulgated: "We should never bow to them, never apologize to them, never play the game they want us to play.") So why are influential leaders of the still ill-organized anti-Islam movement so afraid they may get BNP/EDL cooties as defined by the Left and the PC crowd?

I have yet to see sufficiently reliable and credible evidence that the BNP (let alone the EDP) is antisemitic or racist. The best evidence thus far has been a tissue of innuendos and rumors (sorry, that should be "rumours") often resolved down to an anecdote about a friend of a friend of a cousin who overheard some "BNP toughs" in a pub make racist remarks; or some blurry photograph of a BNP leader standing a few yards (sorry, "meters") away from someone else who happens to be holding a sign of a swastika; or some grainy archival footage of Tommy Robinson waving to a friend with his palm caught instantly upside-down -- of course! a Nazi salute!

As far as I know the BNP are as racist and anti-Semitic as they come. The problems were that this party was the only party that would address certain issues which would encourage people to join even though some of the policies were distasteful.

Consider the EDL, set up with good intentions and some people who were BNP members joined this new organisation, presumably because unlike the BNL the EDL stood for (what I would consider) the right things. However, look what happened when the newspapers got wind that some EDL members were once BNP members. There were no questions of why, just an immediate smear along the lines of "EDL full of BNP activists". I once considered joining the BNP because I was so frustrated with the lack of understanding amongst the main political parties but I was put off by some of their policies. I was glad when the EDL emerged for what I hope, are obvious reasons.

Back on topic though, I really wish we could know what this person had displayed in his window. I mean, even a picture of a decapitated body, placed for no other reason than the poster liked it should be no reason for imprisonment. So why would a picture of something that was done for no other reason than Islam mandated it (for whatever reason) be suddenly worthy of porridge (English slang for doing prison time!)? There has to be more to this story because if there isn't then we (the English) are now officially Royally screwed!

Regards

P.S. pop along to the local newspaper and let them know what you think

http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/Gainsborough-man-jailed-anti-Islam-images-flat/story-15455418-detail/story.html

"Moslems usually delight in photos of mutilated unbelievers, apostates, and disobedient wives."

"If God gives me victory over Quraysh in the future I will mutilate 30 of their men.' When the Muslims saw the apostle's grief and anger against who had thus treated his uncle, they said, 'By God, if God gives us victory over them in the future we will mutilate them as no Arab has ever mutilated anyone' (613)."
Biography of the Prophet, Ibn Ishaq p.387

Any similarities purely coincidental!!!

http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2012/03/muhammad-and-torture.html

London Jim, hello again from South America, La Paz, Bolivia.

I´m not quite in the thick of things jihadi here but I am still keeping up with this site daily and hope in time to move on to West Africa.

I would like to point out that the impression most people in the West will likely have of Bolivia is wrong. It is not a socialist police state crushing peasants and whipping them into frenzies of support for the imams in Iran. Far from that, here I have more freedom than anywhere in the West at this time. I can do almost anything here without a raised eyebrow or a raised voice. We in the West live a fascist tyranny gone mad. Bolivia is free. That is some kind of shock to me, and no doubt to anyone who accepts that I know this place well enough and am not on drugs. England is hell. Come live here and see for yourselves, dear readers.

Of hate speech and prison, I have a book out now that I hope will qualify at least in England.

http://nodhimmitude.blogspot.com/2012/03/my-book-occasional-walker-is-now.html

It´s not much about Islam, but it might be enough to get me a few years in gaol. That would be free rent, so please pass this along to those who can arrange it for me.

Cheers from La Paz. Freer than anywhere in England.

"As far as I know the BNP are as racist and anti-Semitic as they come."

Oh, okay. I guess that settles that then. No need for evidence. Just claim that "as far as I know" it's true -- and it's true. How would you like it if I said "As far as I know, your father is a murdering pedophile" without offering proof?

The worrying line from the comment describing the porcelain pigs case was: "...which would take the final decision on whether to press charges under the Public Order Act."

Sharia law could be enforced on a very large scale if transgressionss could be characterised as behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace.

Street preaching when there are a number of Muslims around, walking a dog past a mosque, any sort of window display (it seems) which might arouse the ire of local 'youths,' making disrespectful comments about Islam or the 'prophet' that happen to be overheard by a nearby Muslim, without their being intended to hear - the could all come under some charge of provocation. The list of things which offend Muslims (i.e. infidels disobeying their obligation to act as dhimmis) is notoriously long. The 'breach of the peace angle' would come from the fact that islam encourages vigilantism in the enforcement of shariah. British plods wishing to maintain order rather than support the rights of freeborn Englishmen, could be counted on to be accommodating.
Having been accused of being institutionally racist, put through ideological minority awareness courses and sure that their superiors would be likely to leave them swinging in the wind if they put a foot wrong in this sensitive area, I'd imagine the boys in blue would be quite enthusiastic about this kind of enforcement of sharia.Cameron's eagerness for the local election of chief constables might well exacerbate the problem (particularly if postal voting is allowed!)

What would his sentence have been if he had posted a picture of "Piss Christ"?

Absolutely incredible. I really do feel sorry for England. I wish you all the best of luck. We have our own battles here in the US but we'll be glad to have you here. Here there is still a right to free speech, that moron magistrate in Pennsylvania notwithstanding.

Aloha Dag !!! Good to hear from you. .been a'while. So glad to see that you got that book of your's printed-up. Can't wait to get a read of it. La Paz is still a few hurdles away for me at present, yet The Impossibles are working hard at it. First beer is on me, an' I'll be wearing a poncho. :-|

Hi there. I know what you mean. Coming back to Australia from South Sudan was awful - the political correctness, the inane denial and frivolity if you try to talk about anything serious, the ignorance ("Where is Sudan? Is it in India?" for example)...and then the Aussie voices on top of it. Even in Islamic Sudan...they are Muslim, true, but not PC, which feels(gulp) worse and harder to handle. What has happened to my people?

I still do not understand how they got away with this.If they used the hate laws and he wasn't calling for violence then I guess he's being jailed for his beliefs. Britain is doomed.

I thought the British people had more chutzpah than this. They should all be taping anti-islam material to their windows and forcing the government to deal with that. I'm sure there aren't enough police to arrest them or jails to hold them ( the muslims have filled those up).

If they do not stand together with their fellow Brits when the government decides to punish them for not following the party line then they can expect that their turn is coming too, unless of course they decide it's easier to tow the line and let the government dictate what they think, say, feel and do. I consider that the height of cowardice and laziness.

Britain is finished! Dhimmi government, legal system no longer fit for purpose and political correctness that turns everything on its head! Our government is engaged on a social engineering project worthy only of Hitler -they are appeasing their way toward the eradication of heritage, ethnic, British people - another holocaust, genocide by subterfuge - our human rights are disappearing fast under an alien occupation of our land. We are being subjugated without firing a shot - wake up British sheeple!

Looks like we pulled their ass out of the ringer for nothing. Same with France. Same with Holland. Same with....

You don't have to belong to the BNP to support their aims. They are the only political party that openly opposes Islamification of our country. They were the first and only party that countered political correctness by first raising the grooming of young white girls for sex by Muslim gangs when the government, social services and the police refused to have anything to do with the issues. Love them or loath them you have to admire their tenacity and patriotism which is gaining them votes nationwide and not just amongst white people but also immigrants that have experienced Islamic brutality first hand.

Britain is lost to Islam & their useful idiot left allies, soon anyone not praying 5 times a day to Mecca will be hauled before the courts. When the revolution to free themselves comes it will make the London riots look like nothing.

In many place in america public display of just picture can be illegal, nothing new here. The 1st Amendment doesnot allow pronographic pictures to display in public.

"Moslems usually delight in photos of mutilated unbelievers, apostates, and disobedient wives."

"If God gives me victory over Quraysh in the future I will mutilate 30 of their men.' When the Muslims saw the apostle's grief and anger against who had thus treated his uncle, they said, 'By God, if God gives us victory over them in the future we will mutilate them as no Arab has ever mutilated anyone' (613)."
Biography of the Prophet, Ibn Ishaq p.387

Any similarities purely coincidental!!!

It didnot happen it was just talk.

DoI demon-strates again that he/she is as thick as a short plank of wood.
Yawn . .verging on Growel.

"This is the road to tyranny."

No, it is tyranny. Britian's already traveled the road, and "speech rime" is already punishable there. And that the terminus of a once-free country.

Hi, PGJ, and yes, the West is seriously difficult to like anymore. I look at the streets of La Paz, for example, and there are no parking meters. That might seem trivial, but without parking meters one is left to park as one can, the one winning the spot being the one happy. For the other? He moves on. There is no income from parking meters for the government to use to oppress the people while bureaucrats line their pockets and build empires of public oppression. There are few traffic lights, a few policemen directing traffic at rush hour, and the streets themselves are in such poor shape only a maniac would speed. So people use common sense when crossing a street or when they confront people crossing, no big deal, no lives lost, no government watching and waiting to take money from all they can for nothing. This is personal, unregulated freedom of the kind we in the West can hardly imagine, and many could not accept. And I pick trivial examples to make this point.

Bolivia is a poor country by most measures, but it is rich in freedom, all of which is glaringly obvious in the nature of the people here who live quietly and peacably for the sake of private and family life. The West is drowning in publicity, in the State enforcing a utopian ideology on the masses from some gnostic belief that the self-appointed elite has a special knowledge about the perfect and universal right way of life, and damn the dissenters. Modernity has been overrun by neo-medievalists, the West turning into a dictatorship of people-farmers. It tells when we prefer the freedom of South Sudan to crushing commands of San Franscico conformity hippies. Bolivia-- of all places!-- is free. The government at high levels here is mad, but it hasn´t got much power, that being in the hands of the people who live pretty well when one considers the alternate world of Britain.

Jim, sell off the wife and children and the dog and join me for a beer in a land free unlike anything left in Europe.

Uh, maybe not so drastic as that. But I would love to tip a mug with you when we meet at last.

P., next year in Juba.

Darren Conway should have known that negative pictures, words, thoughts, or publications against Islam is a serious offense of Sharia Law. They simply aren't prepared for it. They prefer to be refered to as "the religion of peace", and or "innocent victims".

Please address your oppinions towards Christians they can handle it much better, no doubt because they have always been disrespected and discrminated against. So they can deal with it emotionaly and mentally much better than Muslims.

Because the Christian religion isn't so easily deflatable.
I know because I'm one of them.

The offensive material Darren Conway posted in his window must have been very offensive and personal. The U.K 2006 Racial and Religious Hatred Act, does not permit one to make personal ctiticism of a Muslim or Hindu, Sikh or Christian etc. However it does permit 'criticism, expessions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of a particular religion or the beliefs and practices of its adherents.'

The lady with the pigs in her window, was probably committing no offence, but the Police illegally pressured her. The Muslims complained and in the interest of community harmony the police took advantage of the ladies ignorance about the law.

The police have attempted to pressure me into removing anti-Islam signs from my car. I challenged them to arrest me and let a court decide my innocence or guilt. So far they have backed off. My Lawyer assures me I am committing no offence. But will further pressure from local Muslims 'encourage'the police to have another go at me. ???

Query: do you display, on your car, one or more of the following:

Cross of St George sticker.

Cross of St Andrew sticker (if you have Scots relatives).

The Red Dragon of Wales.

The Israeli flag, or else a Star of David?

One can offend Muslims without saying anything at all about Islam...

Just the sight of a cross really sends them *ape-sh*t*.

(Go to Dr Mark Durie's blog and read his post about the Muslim tradition of breaking crosses).

Hey DDA, have you ever checked out the insignia of the Portuguese Air Force? If not take a look on Wikipedia.

How do you like that? That's the cross of the Knight's Templar. Pretty big in Portugal way back when, but they are still using it on their planes today. When I first saw that I thought, wow, that's not very PC. This is a NATO country. Where they involved in the Libya thing?

I'm intrigued that a country has this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/5474620/Nick-Griffin-profile-of-BNP-leader.html

Griffin is anti-semitic, and a racist. Just google his name and you can come up with not only articles in the telegraph ( conservative) but youtube film of him actually saying it.

Also party funds (donated by supporters) have been embezzled by the leadership, and the party has mostly lost credibility.

The best alternative for those of us in the UK who want a party that will deal with muslims, islam and sharia, is the British Freedom Party, who are also looking into working closely with the EDL.

Tommo, google British Freedom Party. Paul Weston, leader, writes for GatesofVienna also. Their policies make a lot of sense to me. See what you think.

UK: Man gets year in prison for posting material "offensive to the Islamic faith" in his front window

Is England Saudi Arabia now? Is Sharia in effect? Is it now illegal to post material "offensive to the Islamic faith" in a window?
......................................

It may well be. This is *appalling*.

More:

I haven't seen what Conway posted, and I do not support the BNP or any group with race-based policies or any truck with antisemitism, but this is a free speech issue.
......................................

Exactly so. One need not necessarily be in full agreement with Conway's views to understand how important it is to defend his right to freedom of speech.

More:

Unless what he posted in his window was calling for violence or genocide, it shouldn't matter how offensive it may have been to any group or individual.
......................................

**Yes**. Unless he was inciting violence, he should be free to post what he likes. Whether you, or I, or "Islam" finds it offensive *should be irrellevant*.

More:

Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate custodial sentence."
......................................

So—a Briton's posting offensive material in the window of his own home has no place in a civilized society, but *imprisoning a man for a year* if such is arbitrarily deemed "offensive" *does*? An odd definition of "civlised society", then...

More:

Sixteen cannabis plants were found growing in his home when police visited to investigate the hate crime.
......................................

"Hate crime". You have Muslim clerics openly calling for British blood to run in the streets, and—insanely—you don't find *them* accused of hate crimes.

More:

"The majority of the displayed posters and images were undoubtedly offensive to the Islamic faith.
......................................

*Lots" of things are "offensive to the Islamic faith"—criticism of the Qur'an and the "Prophet" Muhammed, resistance to forced child marriage, unveiled woman, and freedom of speech.

Well—perhaps they won't have to worry about this last so much in Britain now...

Ebonystone wrote, quoting a comment fomr "Thhis is Lincolnshire":

Here's one comment that gives some idea of what was on Conway's posters:

“Have any of you seen these pictures?? I have! So has my wife (who often walked past this house with my 2 young children). Surely pictures of people who have been tortured and beheaded is offensive!!??”
......................................

Note to this poster: actually, *no*, I do not find pictures of people who have been tortured and beheaded to be offensive. Rather, I find *torture and beheading to be offensive*. I find *those who torture and behead people to be offensive*.

Sean wrote:

Displaying porcelain pigs in your window will attract the attention of the Shariah-enforcing dhimmi British police
................................

What a horrendous story, Sean. I had a nice neighbor lady when I was a kid who had a collection of porcelain pigs in her kitchen window. I thought they were cute.

If you had told me at the time that within a few short decades you would find the police *breaking into a woman's home to remove such a collection* I would not have believed it.

"DefenderofIslam" wrote:

"If God gives me victory over Quraysh in the future I will mutilate 30 of their men.' When the Muslims saw the apostle's grief and anger against who had thus treated his uncle, they said, 'By God, if God gives us victory over them in the future we will mutilate them as no Arab has ever mutilated anyone' (613)."
Biography of the Prophet, Ibn Ishaq p.387

Any similarities purely coincidental!!!

It didnot happen it was just talk.
............................................

Well, that's what I like to see in a "prophet"—threats to mutilate his enemies as "no Arab has ever mutilated anyone".

What could be more indicative of sanctity than threatening to mutilate your foes? What could offer a more perfect model of conduct to devout Muslims today? sarc/off

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter