As many as 100,000 women in Britain have undergone female genital mutilation

This article says that female genital mutilation is a cultural practice that is widespread across Africa. In fact, while others may practice it, it is justified in Islam: "Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)" -- 'Umdat al-Salik e4.3

Muhammad himself did not condemn it, but merely cautioned against going overboard: "A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband." - Sunan Abu Dawud 41.5251

And as such, it is not practiced just in Africa, but in other Muslim areas, such as Iraq and the Maldives. Oh, and Britain.

Until its Islamic justifications are confronted, and the denial that this piece represents with its attribution of the practice to "culture" ends, more girls will suffer.

"100,000 British women mutilated," from the Telegraph, April 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

As many as 100,000 women in Britain have undergone female genital mutilations with medics in the UK offering to carry out the illegal procedure on girls as young as 10, it has been reported.

Investigators from The Sunday Times said they secretly filmed a doctor, dentist and alternative medicine practitioner who were allegedly willing to perform circumcisions or arrange for the operation to be carried out. The doctor and dentist deny any wrongdoing.

The practice, which involves the surgical removal of external genitalia and in some cases the stitching of the vaginal opening, is illegal in Britain and carries up to a 14 year prison sentence.

It is also against the law to arrange FGM.

Known as "cutting", the procedure is traditionally carried out for cultural reasons and is widespread across Africa.

It is thought to be needed as proof of a girl's "purity" for when she marries, but victims are rarely given anaesthetic and frequently suffer long-term damage and pain.

Research suggests that every year up to 6,000 girls in London are at risk of the potentially fatal procedure, and more than 22,000 in the UK as a whole.

The Metropolitan Police said since 2008, it had received 166 reports of people who fear they are at risk of FGM.

It is the same story for all 43 forces across England and Wales with no convictions for the offence ever taking place, according to The Sunday Times.

The newspaper added that only two doctors have been struck off by The General Medical Council since 1980.

According to Forward, a charity which campaigners against FGM, an estimated 100,000 women in the UK have undergone mutilation.

Supermodel Waris Dirie, who was mutilated as a child, is a vociferous opponent of the practice.

Calling for a crackdown on FGM, she said: "If a white girl is abused, the police come break down the door. If a black girl is mutilated, nobody takes care of her. This is what I call racism."

Indeed. Or multiculturalism. Or fear of being labeled "Islamophobic."

| 30 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

30 Comments

| Leave a comment

FGM is one more aspect of the sick, twisted sexual repression that provides the psychological driving force for Islam: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/islam-is-powered-by-muslim-sexual.html

Well, if the women in question come forward and protest, I will support their protest. But, at the moment, I am suffering from severe compassion fatigue when it comes to Muslim women.

In The Times article, the doctors and dentists named in the 'sting' video are all Muslim. But the only mention Islam gets is that the practice "predates Islam and Christianity by thousands of years."

So I guess that's alright then...

I have a question. A few days ago, I was arguing in another site on whether FGM is an Islamic practice or not, and I pointed out how it is mandatory under the Shafiis, recommended under the Hanbalis and glorified under the Hanafis, while stating that I was unclear about the Maliki & Shia schools.

The person who was arguing w/ me stated that it was nowhere in the quran, and amongst the hadiths, it was just there in one of the weak, unreliable hadiths.

Does anyone here know whether that is true? Is there anything about that in

  • Quran
  • Hadiths
    • Sahih
    • Daif
Also, can someone also mention what the Malikis and Shia schools actually say about this practice?

Classic example of how liberals can ruin a country. When you open the door to immigrants, what do you think your going to get? The best of the best? Smart, educated, intelligent teachers, scientists, professional business people? NO!! You get what those countries want to throw out.
Then they come to our civilized land and the demands start. They can't speak the language. They don't want too, they don't care. They won't assimilate. No education, very little intelligence. Well, you don't need many brains to hump a goat or fire an AK47 at children.
Basically...they come with their traditions and culture and vision to change our countries to theirs.
Remember....experiencing different cultures is not always as pleasant as eating foreign foods. Sometimes those cultures are violent, demeaning, repulsive, disgusting and most often...unlawful and illegal?
Stop immigration now!!

Read the introduction to the above article written by Robert Spencer! That'll answer your questions.

Thanks - just saw the Sunan Abu Dawud. However, on the basis of that alone, it does seem a tad strange that 3 of the 4 Sunni schools would be endorsing it, and one of them mandatorily.

The most disturbing aspect of FGM (apart from the mutilation itself) is that it is instigated, enforced, and carried out by women. The mothers and grandmothers of these little girls are the ones pushing for the 'cutting'. I would think that the bonds of mother/daughter trust would forever be broken. How can a woman (a mother and protector) subject their own child to this mutilation?

And how many in the USA? And where is Naomi Wolf and the feminists?

Mark Durie points out that the section from The Reliance of the Traveller is mis-translated by Kim & that this was "allowed to pass" by Al Azhar. "removing the prepuce ... not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert" is not correct. The Arabic actually says "cut out" not cut off. Little bit of taqiyya there...

According to my numbers about 50% of Muslim women worldwide have sufferred this.

Women make sure their girls have it because of the religious exhortation but also because there is the real fear that the girl will grow up to be a prostitute. In Egypt 97% of females have it done which is of even greater concern as 12% of the population is Coptic Christian. This shows that even the Copts, with no basis for the practice at all in Christianity, will do it to their daughters to save them being considered "prostitutes" by the wider Muslim community and treated even worse than they currently are.

What fear for their daughter's safety those parents must have to conduct this barbaric ritual. It is though, merely an extension of the practice of indigenous French women being abused and spat on in certain parts of France for not having head scarves. Life as an oppressed minority in their own countries...

Where are Naomi Wolf and the the other feminists? Silent... forever silent

The feminists are silent out of fear for being called racists or Islamophobes. Instead of calling out Islam for their treatment (or mistreatment) of women(FGM, honor-killings,child brides, etc) they cover it up, ignore it, or make excuses for it. Shame on all these so-called feminists who don't speak out!

How dare the supermodel complain about racism against blacks in Britain when the authorities routinely ignore the sexual grooming and abuse of white teen girls by muslim men.

Being called racists or Islamophobes should be a badge of courage! Why, because it's a lie; just like their "silence is a "lie" to the cause they say they hold dear!

The feminists are a joke, a sad sick joke! Women's rights was their cry... The fight against the oppression of women was that what they wee fighting for! They didn't just loose the war, they walked away from it! In silence! What a bunch of bold face liar's.

Here's a bottom line of bottom lines: Islam and true equality for women are as antithetical to one another as it is possible to be.

Have Islam, then you have females subordinate to males---guaranteed, notwithstanding the garbage, i.e., taqiyya, of how Mohammed improved the lot of women. Even the clitoris of a woman is not safe from the overindulged mediocrity which is the Muslim male.

Defending such Muslim male mediocrity is akin to arguing that the kinder slave masters in the ante-bellum American South were solicitous of their slave property and treated them well, which they did, for instance Jefferson Davis, but who the hell wants to be a well-treated slave if they are fully aware of their human dignity, as Frederick Douglass so poignantly wrote about in his magnificent autobiography? For the record, I would like to note here that while Jefferson Davis and his kind were wrong on slavery (and secession), they were still light years ahead of the typical Islamic male through the centuries, down to the present day I might add.

Islam creates slaves all around. Muslims are slaves of Allah and non-Muslims are, in effect, slaves of Muslims. Islam and the slave mentality go so well together. This alone should be a flashing red light to all who have true knowledge of Islam and who still have kept fine tuned the built-in crap detector they were born with.

Sadly, the people in charge of Britain are so deficient here. This is an extra shame since the British have arguably influenced the course of human history over the past thousand years (mostly for the better I would argue) more than any other people on the planet. And so it is extra sad to see what post-Churchillian Britain has done to immolate itself.

"They therefore redefine what is good and evil in order to fit their lives into what is preached by Islam, instead of examining Islam to see if it fits within the good life. Backwards thinking, imposed by a backward religion." (Bertrand Russell)

http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/12/perfect-man-of-islam.html

There is a storm quietly brewing in the English Isles and to be honest I am not at all upset about it. This may sound harsh but having met many Brits over the years and having heard their hate filled opinions on Jews / Israelis, Irish Catholics (non-Ulster) and the like I kinda support the Muslims in their quest to destroy the underpinnings of the once great UK. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

You are a idiot! If you care about freedom you should not support Muslims against anyone! Because if muslims win, they will have one more bastion to launch from against the rest of free world.

Don't call me an idiot, I say what I mean. While I completely reject Islam and it's hate filled prophet don't beg me to cry for the demise of the insane Britannia which works to demonize Israel (seen BBC lately?) and at the same time protects scumbags like the Abu Qatada. The British deserve everything they get coming down the pipe, as Shakespeare would say "Something is rotten in the state of Britain".

no_mo,

No one is asking you to "cry." You are needlessly sowing division between the Brits and the others. Don't judge the ordinary British people for the nonsense of their mainstream politicians and media. Likewise, all Americans are not to blame for Obama's dangerously and foolishly pro-Islamic, pro-sharia attitudes. The ordinary Brits are by and large fed up with Islam.

Liam,

50%? Can you share the source of these figures with us?

IP,

"I have a question. A few days ago, I was arguing in another site on whether FGM is an Islamic practice or not, and I pointed out how it is mandatory under the Shafiis, recommended under the Hanbalis and glorified under the Hanafis, while stating that I was unclear about the Maliki & Shia schools."

1. Female circumcision is a mainstream orthodox Islamic practice in all the major schools of Islamic jurisprudence, insofar as it is at least recommended, regulated, and viewed favorably in the hadith; whereas uncircumcised women were viewed unfavorably. Female (and male) circumcision is considered an aspect of the fitra (see below).

2. It is also considered sunnah, praiseworthy, and recommended among Malikis.
http://islamqa.info/en/ref/60314/female%20circumcision
http://bewley.virtualave.net/Rissac.html#circumcision
"29.9b Female circumcision
and female circumcision (khifad) is praiseworthy (makruma).
[To remove what the woman has of excess. It is recommended according to at-Tata'i. It is worthy because it brightens the complexion and makes intercourse pleasurable.]"

I have read that according to the Shia it is also recommended.
http://healthipod.tripod.com/Enzy-to-Gluc/female_circumcision.html

I've read an account that a Pakistani Shia group practices it.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=106581
Pakistani Shia
Women Expose Secret Genital Cutting Rite
By Zofeen Ebrahim

"The person who was arguing w/ me stated that it was nowhere in the quran, and amongst the hadiths, it was just there in one of the weak, unreliable hadiths."

It's true that it's not in the Quran, but lots of mainstream aspects of Islam are not in the Quran (e.g., the five daily prayers, any details about Muhammad and his commands and conduct (whom the Quran tells Muslims to follow [33:21] and orders them to obey [4:80])). Sounds like the person you were talking with was an apologist, as judging by the old "it's not in the Quran" line. It's mentioned in multiple sahih hadiths. There is one hadith whose status is disputed, with some classifying it as sahih and others considering it weak (daif). However, the validity of the practice doesn't depend on that hadith alone.

From Islam q and a:

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/60314/female%20circumcision
EXCERPTS:

"Circumcision is not an inherited custom as some people claim, rather it is prescribed in Islam and the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is prescribed. Not a single Muslim scholar – as far as we know – has said that circumcision is not prescribed.

Their evidence is to be found in the saheeh ahaadeeth of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), which prove that it is prescribed, for example:

1-
The hadeeth narrated by al-Bukhaari (5889) and Muslim (257) from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him), that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "The fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, cutting the nails, plucking the armpit hairs, and trimming the moustache."
This hadeeth includes circumcision of both males and females.

2-
Muslim (349) narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory.”
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) mentioned the two circumcised parts, i.e., the circumcised part of the husband and the circumcised part of the wife, which indicates that a woman may be circumcised just like a man.

3-
Abu Dawood (5271) narrated from Umm ‘Atiyyah al-Ansaariyyah that a woman used to do circumcisions in Madeenah and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.” But the scholars differed concerning this hadeeth. Some of them classed it as da’eef (weak) and others classed it as saheeh. It was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. The fact that circumcision for women is prescribed in Islam is confirmed by the ahaadeeth quoted above, not by this disputed hadeeth. But the scholars differed concerning the ruling, and there are three opinions:

1 – That it is obligatory for both males and females. This is the view of the Shaafa’is and Hanbalis, and is the view favoured by al-Qaadi Abu Bakr ibn al-‘Arabi among the Maalikis (may Allaah have mercy on them all).
Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo’ (1/367): Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women in our view. This is the view of many of the salaf, as was narrated by al-Khattaabi. Among those who regarded it as obligatory is Ahmad… it is the correct view that is well known and was stated by al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him), and the majority stated definitively that it is obligatory for both men and women. end quote.
See Fath al-Baari, 10/340; Kishshaaf al-Qinaa’, 1/80

2 – That circumcision is Sunnah for both males and females. This is the view of the Hanafis and Maalikis, and was narrated in one report from Ahmad. Ibn ‘Aabideen al-Hanafi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in his Haashiyah (6/751): In Kitaab al-Tahaarah of al-Siraaj al-Wahhaaj it says: Know that circumcision is Sunnah in our view – i.e., according to the Hanafis – for men and for women. end quote.
See: Mawaahib al-Jaleel, 3/259

3 – That circumcision is obligatory for men and is good and mustahabb for women. This is the third view of Imam Ahmad, and it is the view of some Maalikis such as Sahnoon. This view was also favoured by al-Muwaffaq ibn Qudaamah in al-Mughni.

See: al-Tamheed, 21/60; al-Mughni, 1/63

It says in Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (5/223):

Circumcision is one of the Sunnahs of the fitrah, and it is for both males and females, except that is it obligatory for males and Sunnah and good in the case of women. End quote

Thus it is clear that the fuqaha’ of Islam are agreed that circumcision is prescribed for both males and females, and in fact the majority of them are of the view that it is obligatory for both. No one said that it is not prescribed or that it is makrooh or haraam.
[...]"

END OF EXCERPTS
------------------

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/9412/female%20circumcision
EXCERPT:
"Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about whether women should be circumcised or not. He replied:
Praise be to Allaah. Yes, they should be circumcised, i.e., the top of the piece of skin that looks like a rooster’s comb should be cut. The Messenger of Allaah (S) said to the woman who did circumcisions: “Leave something sticking out and do not go to extremes in cutting. That makes her face look brighter and is more pleasing to her husband.” That is because the purpose of circumcising a man is to make him clean from the impurity that may collect beneath the foreskin. But the purpose of circumcising women is to regulate their desire, because if a woman is not circumcised her desire will be strong. Hence the words “O son of an uncircumcised woman” are used as an insult, because the uncircumcised woman has stronger desire. Hence immoral actions are more common among the women of the Tatars and the Franks, that are not found among the Muslim women. If the circumcision is too severe, the desire is weakened altogether, which is unpleasing for men; but if it is cut without going to extremes in that, the purpose will be achieved, which is moderating desire. And Allaah knows best."

END OF EXCERPT

--------------------

Hadiths:

Sahih Bukhari:

Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "Five practices are characteristics of the Fitra: circumcision, shaving the pubic region, clipping the nails and cutting the moustaches short." (Book #72, Hadith #777)

Narrated Abu Huraira : I heard the Prophet saying. "Five practices are characteristics of the Fitra: circumcision, shaving the pubic hair, cutting the moustaches short, clipping the nails, and depilating the hair of the armpits." (Book #72, Hadith #779)

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said "Five things are in accordance with Al Fitra (i.e. the tradition of prophets): to be circumcised, to shave the pelvic region, to pull out the hair of the armpits, to cut short the moustaches, and to clip the nails.' (Book #74, Hadith #312)

Sahih Muslim:

Abu Huraira reported: Five are the acts quite akin to the Fitra, or five are the acts of Fitra: circumcision, shaving the pubes, cutting the nails, plucking the hair under the armpits and clipping the moustache. (Book #002, Hadith #0495)

Abu Huraira reported: Five are the acts of fitra: circumcision, removing the pubes, clipping the moustache, cutting the nails, plucking the hair under the armpits. (Book #002, Hadith #0496)

Abu Musa reported: There cropped up a difference of opinion between a group of Muhajirs (Emigrants and a group of Ansar (Helpers) (and the point of dispute was) that the Ansar said: The bath (because of sexual intercourse) becomes obligatory only-when the semen spurts out or ejaculates. But the Muhajirs said: When a man has sexual intercourse (with the woman), a bath becomes obligatory (no matter whether or not there is seminal emission or ejaculation). Abu Musa said: Well, I satisfy you on this (issue). He (Abu Musa, the narrator) said: I got up (and went) to 'A'isha and sought her permission and it was granted, and I said to her: 0 Mother, or Mother of the Faithful, I want to ask you about a matter on which I feel shy. She said: Don't feel shy of asking me about a thing which you can ask your mother, who gave you birth, for I am too your mother. Upon this I said: What makes a bath obligatory for a person? She replied: You have come across one well informed! The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When anyone sits amidst four parts (of the woman) and the circumcised parts touch each other a bath becomes obligatory. (Book #003, Hadith #0684)

[Also reported in Malik's Muwatta]

Sunan Abu Dawud

Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah: A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband. (Book #41, Hadith #5251)

Malik’s Muwatta:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Said ibn Abi Said al-Maqburi from his father that Abu Hurayra said, "There are five things from the fitra: cutting the nails, trimming the moustache, removing the hair from the armpit, shaving the pubic region and circumcision." (Book #49, Hadith #49.3.3)

Our dhimmi, un-elected 'government' and police do nothing. Muslims can do what they like here and nobody lifts a finger out of the P-C fear of being labelled 'racist' and because of the uproar from extreme nazi muslims (viz: all of them ) bent on our destruction, and civilisation with us. The 20% Patriotic poll in France is an early warning to multi-culti appeasement administrations - the writing is on the wall. They either stand up and defend their people, country, its heritage, standards, morals, laws and traditions, or they will find themselves rather rudely ejected from power - think carefully, Camoron and Milipede

Wellington, it's not just the British that are deficient. FGM occurs regularly and routinely in my SUBURB of the Twin Cities, Minnesotastan. Authorities completely ignore / refuse to prosecute it, even though it is against State law, in the name of PC/MC.

KoK

Thanks in particular for filling in what the Sahih hadiths say about it. The guy I was arguing w/ was making the case that there was only one hadith, and that too a daif one. It was probably the Abu Dawud one that he was referring to, but your citation of Bukhari makes this one much easier to prove that it's an Islamic custom.

I understand full well, CGW, that it's not just the British who are deficient in comprehending Islam's many nefarious aspects. But my comment above was made specific to Britain since the article only dealt with Britain. The entire West, as I know you know, is asleep to be sure, and it is a potentially lethal slumber if ever there were one.

Time for all the West to wake up, eh? But this won't happen with the current elites in charge, that's for sure. Hope you and yours are doing well.

I despair of my state authorities "waking up". MN is too "blue", too entrenched in PC/MC politics.

Little girls suffer the lifelong effects in the meantime. In my community, little girls (under "puberty age" nine) walk around in hijabs.

I know how you feel, but the truth is that only the submissive defenders of muhammadianism are allowed to speak. Woman against their oppression are silenced by fear and powerlessness. And the free women in non Islamic societies are " 'Silent' is CONSENT".

How can there be real "Mother & Daughter" bond/love if you can't object to your child/daughter being raped under the guise of marriage.

As many as 100,000 women in Britain have undergone female genital mutilation
...............................

Every Westerner should be shocked and horrified by this.

More:

Until its Islamic justifications are confronted, and the denial that this piece represents with its attribution of the practice to "culture" ends, more girls will suffer.
...............................

Yes.

As many as 100,000 women in Britain have undergone female genital mutilations with medics in the UK offering to carry out the illegal procedure on girls as young as 10, it has been reported.
...............................

**Horrifying**. These must be mostly Muslim doctors—they should be prosecuted, barred from ever practicing medicine again, and deported if possible.

And this doesn't even address all the British girls who are spirited back to Dar-al-Islam to be mutilated, nor the girls who are simply cut up by their own relatives on the kitchen table.

Kepha wrote:

Well, if the women in question come forward and protest, I will support their protest. But, at the moment, I am suffering from severe compassion fatigue when it comes to Muslim women.
...............................

I understand your point, Kepha—but consider *this*: even if you cannot bring yourself to care about these girls, how much do you think it will embolden Muslims to find that their bloody mutilation of their own children is ignored in the West, and that Muslim doctors can violate the Hippocratic Oath and all the laws of civilized Britain with such impunity?

When it comes to imposing other aspects of Shari'ah on the Infidels, they will believe—for good reason—that they have carte blanche...

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter