Egypt's Islamic supremacist-dominated Parliament mulling laws legalizing child marriage and sex with corpses

Here is yet more delightful evidence that Sharia is benign and completely compatible with U.S. Constitutional values, as we are constantly told. "Egypt’s women urge MPs not to pass early marriage, sex-after-death laws: report," by Abeer Tayel for Al Arabiya, April 25 (thanks to Stephen):

Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws on the minimum age of marriage and allowing a husband to have sex with his dead wife within six hours of her death according to a report in an Egyptian newspaper.

The appeal came in a message sent by Dr. Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker, Dr. Saad al-Katatni, addressing the woes of Egyptian women, especially after the popular uprising that toppled president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011.

She was referring to two laws: one that would legalize the marriage of girls starting from the age of 14 and the other that permits a husband to have sex with his dead wife within the six hours following her death.

According to Egyptian columnist Amro Abdul Samea in al-Ahram, Talawi’s message included an appeal to parliament to avoid the controversial legislations that rid women of their rights of getting education and employment, under alleged religious interpretations....

The controversy about a husband having sex with his dead wife came about after a Moroccan cleric spoke about the issue in May 2011.

Zamzami Abdul Bari said that marriage remains valid even after death adding that a woman also too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband.

Two years ago, Zamzami incited further controversy in Morocco when he said it was permissible for pregnant women to drink alcohol.

But it seems his view on partners having sex with their deceased partners has found its way to Egypt one year on.

Egyptian prominent journalist and TV anchor Jaber al-Qarmouty on Tuesday referred to Abdul Samea’s article in his daily show on Egyptian ON TV and criticized the whole notion of “permitting a husband to have sex with his wife after her death under a so-called ‘Farewell Intercourse’ draft law.”

“This is very serious. Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues? Did Abdul Samea see by his own eyes the text of the message sent by Talawi to Katatni? This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right! Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?”

Many members of the newly-elected, and majority Islamist parliament, have been accused of launching attacks against women’s rights in the country.

They wish to cancel many, if not most, of the laws that promote women’s rights, most notably a law that allows a wife to obtain a divorce without obstructions from her partner. The implementation of the Islamic right to divorce law, also known as the Khula, ended years of hardship and legal battles women would have to endure when trying to obtain a divorce.

Egyptian law grants men the right to terminate a marriage, but grants women the opportunity to end an unhappy or abusive marriages without the obstruction of their partner. Prior to the implementation of the Khula over a decade ago, it could take 10 to 15 years for a woman to be granted a divorce by the courts.

Islamist members of Egyptian parliament, however, accuse these laws of “aiming to destroy families” and have said it was passed to please the former first lady of the fallen regime, Suzanne Mubarak, who devoted much of her attention to the issues of granting the women all her rights....

| 64 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

64 Comments

| Leave a comment

and the other that permits a husband to have sex with his dead wife within the six hours following her death,

*****

File that one under EEEEEUUUUUWWWWW !!!

Only from "great" Islamic minds !

And I thought that was the funny part. In more than one way.

Egypt's Islamic supremacist-dominated Parliament mulling laws legalizing child marriage and sex with corpses
............................

More of the baleful legacy of the "Prophet" Muhammed.

It is well documented that Muhammed married Aisha when she was just six years of age, and consummated the marriage when she was was a little nine-year-old child.

As to necrophilia, this is from a book called "Kanz Al Umal" (The Treasure of the Workers), in the chapter of "The issues of women", authored by Ali Ibn Husam Aldin, commonly known as Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi. He based his book on the hadiths and sayings listed in "Al-Jami Al-Saghir," written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

Here is the Hadith:

Narrated by Ibn Abbas:

"I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I slept with her in her coffin that I may lessen the pressure of the grave." ("The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali.)

The Arabic word used here for slept is "Id'tajat," and literally means "lay down" with her. It is often used to mean, "Lay down to have sex."

Father Zakaria Botros has cited this numerous times.

Some Muslims deny that the Hadith above indicated that Muhammed actually had sex with the poor woman's corpse, but that he simply slept in her grave—which is rather disturbing in and of itself, of course.

In any case, though, in the above instance these are not some "Islamophobes" referring to Islam's approval of necrophilia, but *Muslims themselves*.

Of course, as shocking as the necrophilia passage is, I'm even more concerned about the further condoning of child rape, which has caused so much suffering all over the Muslim world.

Whenever a society becomes more Islamic—as are the countries of the "Arab Spring", pedophilia raises its ugly head, per the model of Islam's "ideal man".

There once was a Muslim named Dave
who found a dead whore in a cave
Now you must admit
she did smell like sh_t
but think of the money he saved


"that permits a husband to have sex with his dead wife within the six hours following her death."

Can we assume that the husband doesn't get an answer when, afterwards, he asks, "Was it good for you?" (though such consideration may be haram in islam)

"...a woman also too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband."

Umm, there could be some...umm, MECHANICAL problems there? I mean, uhhhh, you know, ummmm, well, ahhhh...

Never mind...


Even the Bizarro World out of the old Superman comic books was less bizarre than Islam. A major key to Islam's eventual destruction is to just let more and more about Islam keep coming out over the years. Islam will help to do itself in. The modern world is passing Islam by and Islam will never catch up. It can't, and this is because it is indeed, as Ataturk is alleged to have said, "the immoral theology of a seventy-century Bedouin, a rotting corpse that poisons our lives." I would only add that the "rotting corpse" part of this quote takes on additional meaning in light of what is reported in this article.

Yep, can't make this stuff up. And Bizarro World is startin' to look almost normal like.

That's "seventh-century" and not "seventy-century." Mea culpa for that bizarre spelling.

They are saying the corpse sleeping thing - came from the Morocco fatwa - where a man asked [just joking - the next time his wife dies] could he sleep with her.

And the Imam answered yes!

But the adult breastfeeding and the intercourse with the dead woman 'controversies', likely were stirred up by Father Zakaria Botros - reading the Hadiths - the obscure ones that perhaps Muslims would rather forget.

[It was after this - we began hearing talk about putting these strange Islamic findings into law - embarrassingly so!]

Shocking what Muhammad did or what he thought he was 'guided' to do. And that this is the legacy Muslims are obliged to follow.

Muslims: "We love death more than you love life."

The Egyptian parliament is bound to prove it.

But a man having sex with a dead woman who was NOT his wife? What about that? Halal or haram?! Yes, I know, of course haram, and no doubt he would be severely punished...

A new spin on an old classic -

Outside the Persian gates - We Love Death - More Than You Love Your Wine!

Imagine if Persia said - we'll keep the wine!!

::

This was really about war with the infidel - on Muhammad's battlefield there were no limits.

Unless she was either a dead slave or a dead non-Muslima captive perhaps.

remember, this is just a starting point to ease the people into shariah...

Time to send more money to Muslim Brotherhood.

Come on guys, it's not as bad as it sounds, there are rules to follow...
"Do not re-wash the deceased after having a sexual intercourse with"
"Do not put any limit on the intercourse with a dead woman"
(Al-Sharwani, v.1, p.263)
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/03/necrophilia-in-islam-necrophilie-en.html

It's any woman I'm afraid.

The Islamic Hadith is called 'Intercourse with a Dead Woman'

Which retells how Muhammad goes into a woman he admired burial chamber or crypt and has intercourse with her.

In a separate Hadith - specific instructions are given on how to wash the body [actually it instructs that the body not be washed] before the act.


It is permissible in Islam to sleep with the dead.

This was really about war with the infidel - on Muhammad's battlefield there were no limits.

War has a way of going out of control - a way of straying from its original reasons, whether the reasons are justifiable or not, to become only about itself. It was not for nothing that among the Greeks, Ares was the most hated god.

Even the idiots who wrote the Qur'an may have known this, yet they said:

Fighting is obligatory for you, much as you dislike it. But you may hate a thing although it is good for you, and love a thing although it is bad for you. God knows, but you know not. (2:216)


Must coitus be completed within the six hour window or must only the initial penetration be made in that time?

This is an interesting question for Honest Ibe Hooper and all libtarded dhimmis to consider.

Islam: pure evil

MY COMMENT ON MOHAMMED AND NECROPHILIA

When I posted my comment earlier today on Robert's new book about necrophilia possibly being one of the disgusting details that Ibn Hisham may have purged from Mohammed's biography I said that to mock the prophet never realizing it could be true. Could what I said about Mohammed eating the flesh and drinking the blood of his murdered enemies also be true? What about his sodomizing of boys and bestiality and marrying a mule? Do these now seem farfetched after reading this piece about Islam and after death sex? Is it much different than making love to a statue or stone? Maybe Muhammad had the hots for the Kaaba?

Here's a short Moslem poem that's apropos:

We love death
More than you love life
And that includes having sex
With our dear departed wives.
It differs little from making love
To a statue or stone
But our great prophet had the hots
For the Kaaba you know.

"...a woman also too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband."

Umm, there could be some...umm, MECHANICAL problems there? I mean, uhhhh, you know, ummmm, well, ahhhh...

Never mind...

---------------------------------
Comment:

Well, actually, with a little help of her hands, mouth, and rigor mortis (“stiffness of death”), he might be hard enough! And, she could get 6 months of pleasure out of him – more than she’d probably gotten during their entire marriage.

He’d even get that eternal erection those martyr-wannabees struggle for!

I guess, in Arabia, a corpse would still be intact enough to have sex with for six months.

Islamic science (education) at its best.

Leave no corpse behind! Or, leave no corpse's behind alone.

If ever there was a case about, "You can't make this stuff up..." this has to be it!

Muslim men can marry additional, wives, regardless of whether their current wive(s) are jealous. Muslim men can also beat the wive(s) if they disobey commands to submit to sex.
It's not difficult to imagine that when these women submit to their husband's commands for sex, they are likely to not be thrilled to do so... probably just lay there like a corpse. Therefore, having sex with a dead Muslima wife is probably quite similar to when they are still alive.

Sharia = imprisonment of the mind---and of the body and spirit too. Have Sharia to the extent that it does exist and you have man as robot to the extent that man can be such.

Sharia doesn't expand the human condition. Rather it diminishes it to the extent that it is applied.

Islam is the religion which puts straight-jackets on people and it calls this both proper and virtuous. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Islam makes slaves of Allah and Muslims in turn make slaves of non-Muslims. A more wretched belief system would be hard to find.

I hope people will now understand why I want to crusade for children's rights in canada and expose these canadian Corporations that do Business with the Sex-Tourism islamic nations that actually aid and abet canadian men to go there have have sex with young girls and the return to canada.

If we remain silent on our Creeping Shariah from the likesof Imam Steve Rockwell and Aly Hindy along with Dr.Sheema khan form CAIR canada, it will be just a matter of time until they DEMAND Shariah in the no-go zones for the muslim hell-holes imported to Toronto from Gaza and Iran. Pedophila and gay-bashing will be the norm for muslims and the COPS with Hijabs and Niqabs won't lift a finger to stop it and thus... more Honour killings and child rapes by muslim males since muhammad is their example of the Perfect man that raped Aisha at 53 as she was 9 years old.

The odd thing though is that the leftist/liberals/feminists and gay community have a unholy romance with the islamic-supremacy thugs and will be killed once they fullfilled their purpose as usefull-idiots for dawah and Taqqiyah.
When i tried to save gays from the Pro-hamas goons in the PRIDE parade in Toronot canada, I got the usual Homophobe label when i really was against the pro-hamas people since gays are murdered in gaza and most OIC armpit nations.

Medina is a A$$hole of islam, and Mekkah is about 100 miles up it with one huge boil that muslims face and pray to 5 times a day .

As the Arab Spring contiunes to wither on the vine....

Did this story make the front page of the NYT? Was it covered on the NBC evening news? If not, why not?

"When i tried to save gays from the Pro-hamas goons in the PRIDE parade in Toronot canada, I got the usual Homophobe label..."

Trying to save radical Leftists from Islam is only one microscopic increment in useless absurdity away from trying to save Muslims from Islam.

There is something hugely more important for freedom and the free world than Muslims in Egypt marrying children or having sex with corpses according to Islamic law - the coming American elections.

Obama needs to be voted out and you guys need to get behind Romney, or else you might think that Allah sux, but sux you will.

Islamist members [i.e., plain old Muslims] of Egyptian parliament, however, accuse these laws [the Khula, "that allows a wife to obtain a divorce without obstructions from her partner"] of “aiming to destroy families” and have said it was passed to please the former first lady of the fallen regime, Suzanne Mubarak, who devoted much of her attention to the issues of granting the women all her rights....

"Suzanne" Mubarak, eh? I can see her now, in a pastel pantsuit.

And let us not forget, by repeating:

...the former first lady of the fallen regime, Suzanne Mubarak, who devoted much of her attention to the issues of granting the women all her rights....

Oh, those terrible dictators of Muslim countries. In fact, if it weren't for most of the dictators of modern Muslim countries, life would have devolved into sheer Talibanesque Shaba'abian shiskabob Hell in those countries, what with the natural appetite of most Muslims for their slavish submission to Muhammad and the Koran.

"Suzanne" Mubarak, eh? I can see her now, in a pastel pantsuit.

Oh and -- how could I forget? -- a fashionable Capri-blue Jackie-Onassisian scarf & Jackie O sunglasses dark enough to shield viewers from the sadness with which her eyes must have been weighed down all those years, haunted by a Mephistophelian love she couldn't help have for the godfather of all oppression, Mohammed himself.

I apologize to everyone in advance, but I can't help it.

===============================

If a man gives a woman
an explosive suicide vest,
is she a blow-up doll?
I ask only half in jest.

Sex with the dead! Yugh! But necrophilia is too clumsy a word to use. From now on, I'll refer to this disgusting act as 'Shari'a shafting'.

Clowns!

Bizarro World indeed.

But you know, the explanation will be that those are "Pre-modern Practices", nothing to do with us! Or only in backward places!

And the ghost of the late Jameela Barnette will appear, and spout rantings about "cannibal Christians".

Abusing and disrespecting women is what we've come to expect from mohammedans while women are alive, and now it seems after women are dead, as well. I guess it isn't enough to abuse and disrespect women while they are alive. No, it doesn't stop there, and this final gross sex act really punctuates how evil mohammedans are and how low they will go to prove just how worthless women are to them. Ironically, these men are revealing their own lack of character and worth--not women's, and how barbaric and vile islam & company truly are.

Not in the case of muhammad. Apparently he died fully armed and there was quite a furore as to how to deal with it. I forget which hadith I read that in but it's there somewhere, however I don't recall there were any takers for the pleasure of having conjugal relations with his corpse.

Muslims are more than welcome to have sex w/ their dead wives. It's when they have sex w/ their living wives that i have a problem - b'cos they then expand the population of islam, w/ all its societal implications.

This from the same country that gave islam the 'Reliance of the Traveller', and all that stuff about the sacredness of Mohammed's urine, and so on. Isn't it wonderful that they're debating all these things now? With some luck, other countries like Pakistan, Libya, Saudi Arabia and so on can adapt them, so that they can move towards a more islamic future.

"The Islamic Hadith is called 'Intercourse with a Dead Woman'

Which retells how Muhammad goes into a woman he admired burial chamber or crypt and has intercourse with her."

Please tell me this is a joke?

Pope Benedict XVI quoted a 14th-Century Christian emperor who said Muhammad had brought the world only "evil and inhuman" things . . .

And do you promise to take this woman to be your lawfully wedded wife until death do you part, ..... and, eh, up to around six hours after, if you're in the mood?

Clowns!

Is the Egyptian Parliament a legislative body, or a dead body?

Once again, Islam shows that its "sexual ethics" are merely granting blessing to every sexual lust of the male sex.

In contrast:

For the woman which have a husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband (Rom. 7:2). Hence the "...till death do us part" in traditional Christian marriage vows.

It's strange, but I didn't see 'sex with your wife within six hours of her death' at the '1001 islamic inventions' exhibition in Istanbul...

To be honest, I'm all for Islamic countries becoming more Islamic. Because that means they will become even more backward, retarded, and primitive than they already are, making life worse and much harder for muslims.

Has anyone ever been to a muslim country? I've been all over north africa and the middle east, and it's like stepping into a worm-hole in the fabric of the space time continuum. Like a parallel universe where left is right, right is wrong, black is white, and up is down.

They should really rename the middle east 'The Twilight Zone'.

A domestic altercation one afternoon and a subsequent revelation about faith conversion changed the lives of Christian couple Amin Masih and Shehnaz. While the couple decided to stick with each other, they were shunned by their hometown and the kindness once shown by their Muslim neighbours soon turned into disapproval and threats

Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/04/26/christian-couples-on-the-run-in-pakistan/#ixzz1t8oruo6H

Youssef

As usual, when Muslim men do something atrocious the focus is always on the woman and the negative affect she has on society. But let's honestly ask ourselves, and contemplate the answer, what is the character of a man who will stick his ding dong in a dead person and seek to have an orgasm while the soul and life of that person has left the body? It appears that Muslim men have no soul bonding experiences with the people they have sex with. They use sex as a weapon, as a means to create more jihadi soldiers or as a pleasurable release only for themselves. But they don't use it for what it was intended for. Perhaps this provides a clue into why so many Muslim men who "look" normal walking around in our society are emotionally retarded. Indulged in every way by their families just for being male, told fantastic stories of never ending sex with virgins if they kill themselves in the cause of furthering Islam and constantly reminded that they are superior to everyone else must make them feel invincible. Curious then that while having no shame for screwing a corpse they fall apart like little girls if one of their women embarrasses them.

Perhaps screwing the corpse of their dead wife is the ultimate revenge against women, literally and figuratively.

johnmatt,

You posted "To be honest, I'm all for Islamic countries becoming more Islamic. Because that means they will become even more backward, retarded, and primitive than they already are, making life worse and much harder for muslims."

I tend to agree, in principle. The only problem is, as islamic countries become more backward and even less productive, they will demand more aid - jizya, in fact - from Western nations, and our deluded "leaders" will pay it.

If Western nations would only find the balls to stand up and say "Enough! No more aid, no more military assistance, no more anything!" then I wouldn't care what muslims do in their own countries, nor give a damn what becomes of them.

"Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues?"

This is the most sadly hilarious part. Imagine for a moment, the 1787 Constitutional Convention of the newly created United States, with Madison and Hamilton and Franklin discussing the permissibility of sex with a dead body.

Clearly Islam is the religion of the insane...

EliasX wrote, replying to George:

"...a woman also too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband."

Umm, there could be some...umm, MECHANICAL problems there? I mean, uhhhh, you know, ummmm, well, ahhhh...

Never mind...

---------------------------------
Comment:

Well, actually, with a little help of her hands, mouth, and rigor mortis (“stiffness of death”), he might be hard enough! And, she could get 6 months of pleasure out of him – more than she’d probably gotten during their entire marriage.

He’d even get that eternal erection those martyr-wannabees struggle for!
......................................

Elias, "hands" and "mouth" would do *nothing* for the dead, and rigor mortis is a pretty short-lived phenomenon, and would hardly result in anything resembling the "desired" state, in any case...

But then, it is insanity that we are even discussing such issues.

I have never noted *any* creed as f*cked-up as Islam when it come to love and sex—or, really, mostly just sex, since Islam is a loveless a faith as can be imagined.

Virtually *every* aspect of Islam mitigates *against* love—FGM for little girls, the bans against even the most innocent mixing of the sexes, child marriage, forced marriage, general oppression of women, wife beating, polygamy, the "Triple Talaaq" divorce, "honor killing", and now, sex with corpses.

What normal person would even want to have sex with their spouse's corpse? It is either posthumous marital rape, or else an attempt at a final "intimacy" that one would only attribute to the temporarily insane.

Sane people would consider anything beyond a final kiss to be a *desecration* of their loved one's body.

But then, nothing about Islam is either sane or normal—or decent.

In Denmark we have a cabbie, a Turk according to his name, who strangled a female passenger. She faked death, whereupon he raped her dead body, as he thought it.
He was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment for attempted murder, rape and indecency with a corpse (he did believe her to be dead!).

It is a strange thought that in a Muslim country the cabbie might very well be punished very severely (he did shame the honor of her father/husband/guardian/brother) if the deed could be at all proven (the lack of a sufficient number of witnesses), but indecency with a corpse would not come into it.

necrophilia!!!!! I can tell is this:
this guy muhamad was one sexualy twisted SOB. he was into evrything, from pedophilia to necrophila and everything in between! if he is done, the muslims find a was to sanitize and make it ok to do.
M

Sharia law is basically what does the Qur'an say and what would Mohammad do. If Mohammad had a desire to have sex with the corpse of any female no doubt he would have had a "revelation" telling him it was okay.

"But then, nothing about Islam is either sane or normal—or decent."

But remember, Muslims are human. Therefore, what...?

Georgio-

I haven't read any of the other comments yet, because I'm still howling with laughter over yours!

I HAVE heard, though, that when a man dies, he has one, final, MECHANICAL "gift" from Allah, so to speak, though I don't know how long that gift "lasts".

Dowsie

Ok. I can't resist...

There once was an old man from Mecca
Who was blessed with a gargantuan Pecker
But on the day that he died, something went awry,
And his pecker looked more a Gecko.

crap

"And his pecker looked more like a Gecko" is how it should read.

sorry.

You're forgetting Calvin and Augustine. The Fall. What the church calls Sin.

Yes, Muslims are human, children of Adam. Fallen humans. Sinful humans. Evil humans, merely exhibiting to the nth degree all the things that evil humans do and have always done...including in the millennia of human history prior to Islam. Old-fashioned Presbyterian clergymen wouldn't have been in the least surprised or shocked by the things that Muslims do or by the fact that the Muslim cult permits and prescribes and even praises and exalts such things. It's only because many in the west have lost that gritty, bleak Christian realism about unredeemed human nature and the depths to which it can sink, that people like you get all puzzled and shocked and decide that Muslims can't possibly be human.

There is no evil that Muslims do that other groups of humans haven't done or don't do. The figure of Mohammed, which Spencer is arguing is primarily fictional, 'rings true' when one compares it with real life historical figures such as Hitler, Stalin, and Chairman Mao...not to mention the likes of Pol Pot.

Sure, Muslims seem to go in for more of a variety of evil practices all at once and systematised and sacralised, at a level other groups don't do *today*. But leave the present day, start digging around in history and archaeology, and they don't look all that much out of the common way.

Surely you've read Petronius and Tacitus. Surely you know of the orgiastic cults of Bacchus and Cybele. Surely you know what the Aztecs got up to, and the Thuggees and the Aztecs. The Thuggees might have been influenced by Islam, but the Aztecs thought up their industrial-scale human sacrifice system all on their lonesome.

And in the PNG jungle there was a tribe or group of tribes that had something a whole hell of a lot like the Mohammedan exaltation of taqiyya - when told the story of the betrayal of Jesus by Judas, they cheered and grinned and thought Judas was just the most amazingly clever and admirable guy. (This tribe differed from Muslim, however, in that they had actually realized that they had painted themselves into a corner, and they had come up with a method of making a peace that could sorta kinda be trusted. See a book called 'Peace Child').

I don't know whether you've read M Scott Peck's 'People of the Lie'. He wasn't thinking of Muslims at all. Islam wasn't a blip on his radar screen - in his one mention of it he seems to think it is a respectable 'moral' religion. He figured out his definition of human evil - individual and group - and spiritual evil (after observing a couple of exorcisms - not the Hollywood caricature but the real thing [and successful; the patients, who had *asked* for help and consented to the process, were healed] where he encountered a Presence that he couldn't explain scientifically at all) - from experience within America, with common-or-garden westerners, rich and poor, of both secular and nominally religious backgrounds. Yet everything he says about evil and evil people and how they operate - including the title of his book, 'People of the Lie ' - perfectly describes Muslims and Islam.

For that matter, anyone who's read Dante's Inferno and Charles Williams' analysis of same in his book 'The Figure of Beatrice' will find that Dante's analysis of the processes of corruption of the city and of the soul - an analysis based overwhelmingly upon *non-Muslim* examples of same - 'fits' with the sort of thing one sees when one tries to figure out Muslim psychology or observes the goings on in a Muslim polity.

Muslim evil is *human* evil. A particularly obvious and glaring exhibition of same, but nothing all that novel about it, when you stop and think.

LemonLime wrote:

"But then, nothing about Islam is either sane or normal—or decent."

But remember, Muslims are human. Therefore, what...?
....................................

Dear LemonLime, I addressed this issue at some length here:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/04/norway-mass-murderer-breivik-reveals-his-true-inspiration-we-have-drawn-from-al-qaida-and-militant-i.html#comment-874478

I wrote, in part:

"...but I *do* believe that truly devout Muslims—those who take the tenets of their barbaric creed to heart—the murder of Infidels, the genocide of Jews, child "marriage", the rape of young boys, the condoning of "Honor Killing"—do render themselves "inhuman" in the moral sense.

"Certainly, while I have in the broad sense a very positive view of humans as a species, and as I regard our long-term prospects, I also am all too well aware of the evil of which humans are capable.

"The horrors of sending slaves to the arena in Rome, of Aztecs sacrificing those they captured to their bloody gods, of torture and unjust war, of Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot. The practitioners of the terrible savagery of Fascism and hard-core Communism and Islam are still "human", but present a side of humanity few in the civilized world would condone or embrace.

"So, while embracing the barbarity of Islam does not strip one of one's humanness in the literal sense, it certainly strips them of their humanity, as does the embrace of any inhumane creed."

Perhaps screwing the corpse of their dead wife is the ultimate revenge against women, literally and figuratively.

That’s probably true Isabellathecrusader. It's depravity to please the Marquis de Sade. The farewell law is a final insult.

To read what Muslim women complain about, it’s not as if Muslim men are paying attention to what their wives say or want.

In those six hours, it’s the only time in a Muslim man’s life that his wife’s silence can’t possibly mean “no.”


David Dowse—OT, but how is your father doing? I hope he is well.

"You're forgetting Calvin and Augustine. The Fall."

If that were a sufficient explanation, the problem would dissolve the ideological-cultural borders of Islam, and we would just have a general human problem. There is obviously something systemic about Islam that makes it, and its human carriers, singular and distinct from garden-variety sin and evil.

You don't get my point.

From a Christian POV, this is how the world looks:

Fallen, sinful humans, inclined to evil, created the Thuggee Cult, and created the Bacchic frenzies, and the self-castration of the devotees of Cybele. And the sacrifices of Moloch.

Fallen, sinful humans made certain centres in West Africa - and Uppsala, too, way back in the day - and the Aztec pyramids centres of wholesale human sacrifice.

Fallen, sinful humans produced Pol Pot and his cronies and the Cambodian genocide, and Stalin and his cronies and *their* mass murders, and the Rwanda genocide.

And fallen humans, at a very late stage in human history (given that humans have been around in a form like us, for at least 50 000 years already) came up with Mohammedanism: *possibly* the worst of the many appalling religio-political systems that the depraved human mind has thought up, or at least about the worst that we currently know of; but given that we only know about those systems that have been invented since people had writing, and that were practised (or described) by partly literate people we still can't say for sure. Worse may have existed, and destroyed themselves or been destroyed by the exasperated neighbours, without any record being left; humanity has been around on this planet perhaps 100 times longer than Mohammedanism has existed. Plenty of time to experiment...

There are different varieties and subsets of evil empires and evil ideologies and what I would call evil black-magic cults.

Muslims didn't *invent* either slavery or polygyny and all the associated evils; both had been practised in many parts of the world for millennia before Islam decided to sacralise them. They didn't even invent FGM, merely adopted and perpetuated it.

It's ironic that you - who if I recall correctly, are not in any sense of the word a practising Christian, but some type of oh-so-sophisticated and superior agnostic? - are more inclined to view Islam in apocalyptic terms, as if it is some entirely surprising, unique and extraordinary visitation upon the earth, than I who am the stupid, primitive, unphilosophical and clumsily literalistic believer-in-an-actual-incarnation-and-actual-resurrection that I am.

It's ironic that you - who if I recall correctly, are not in any sense of the word a practising Christian, but some type of oh-so-sophisticated and superior agnostic? - are more inclined to view Islam in apocalyptic terms, as if it is some entirely surprising, unique and extraordinary visitation upon the earth, than I who am the stupid, primitive, unphilosophical and clumsily literalistic believer-in-an-actual-incarnation-and-actual-resurrection that I am.

There is no way that you are a stupid primitive, a clumsy literalist, or an un-philosophical rube. You are one of the best-read posters on this site, if not the best. [That takes care of that primitive idea. I don't know many Anglicans or Episcopalians who are literalists; and I don't know anyone who has spent any time on farms who isn't philosophical, even if some are not formal philosophers.] I've learned a lot from you, and would never have got to know of some interesting and important books without you.

Your phrase, "fallen, sinful humans," captures in six syllables the Christian view of human nature. It is not an easy idea or one that seems hopeful - at first. Perhaps that's why there have been centuries of theology on the nature of humanity and sin.

You mention Tacitus. In his Annales, who is more prideful or evil than Lucius Aelius Sejanus? What does it earn him? A trip down the Gemonian Stairs.

If Islam is in part an old Christian heresy, then the Muslim's "submission" was perhaps the attempt to rule pride. In any case, the results have been a disaster, and Islam will trip down a flight of stairs one day too.

OT - You wrote a few days ago about your eye problems. You're on my prayer list now. All the best to you dumbledoresarmy. Take care.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter