UK: County councillor investigated for distributing leaflet criticizing Muslims

What exactly did Graham Partner say that was false? We see the victimhood game play out again and again and again, after every jihad terror plot and attack -- most recently after the Toulouse jihad massacre.

"Leicestershire councillor facing probe over message criticising Muslims," from the Leicester Mercury, April 6 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Leicestershire county councillor is being investigated after distributing a leaflet which criticised Muslims.

Earlier this year, Graham Partner – who quit the BNP to sit as an independent – sent out a New Year message to voters in his Coalville division.

It featured part of an article from a national newspaper which said victimhood "comes easily" to followers of Islam.

The article added: "Every terrorist atrocity, every blood- soaked massacre is justified by reference to imagined grievances. But the greatest persecutors of other faiths are Muslim, themselves.

"The response from the Western church leaders is deafening silence, afraid to accept that their ideological paradise of multi-cultural, multi-faith, left-wing society is nothing more than a fantasy."

Two county councillors and two parish councillors lodged a complaint, and the county council's standards board is now investigating.

Is truth a defense any more in Dhimmi Britannia? If so, I can give Partner reams of documentation of his assertions.

| 34 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

34 Comments

| Leave a comment

Robert, you screwed up big time this time. Graham Partner is an anti-Semite and an Iran-regime apologist. I personally am opposed to preemptive Israeli strikes on Iran (I'm also an old-fashioned moderate who supports the two-state solution), and as a Jew I understand, unlike the anti-Semites who put out this video (link provided below) that the term "Chosen People" means in the sense of giving a moral message to the people of the world and to act morally yourself; it does not mean "superior above all people" in the sense of Nazi or similar "ubermensch" superior race theory. Please investigate your 'friends' with a little more diligence, especially if you are bothering to wish us all a happy Passover, then slap us in the face with (mistaken and unintended, I hope) glowing encomia to a worm like Graham Partner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eptPeSmA37U

Please view the video and tell me if you think Jews by and large are arrogant people who believe themselves to be 'chosen' in the way meant in this obnoxious and disgusting video and if you think Graham Partner and his ilk should be praised to the skies on your website. Please tell me then whether your wishes over the last 24 hours for Chag Pesach Sameach were just words or whether you really meant them.

What a surprise. Let`s hope they have a thorough investigation and come to the conclusion that everything said is true. won`t hold my breath.

I don`t think Robert was endorsing everything said and written by this person. This man may be everything you say he is but that does not mean that what he has written on this occasion is not true.

What exactly did Graham Partner say that was false?

*****

Robert, I know that you know. What Partner said was the simple truth. Truth has become hate speech, but only to leftists and totalitarians.

This must change, and that will only occur as we take more and more control of news/information dissemination. Thank the Lord for the internet.

And the left knows that, explaining all the continuing attempts to saddle government control over the internet, not the largely open structure it presently has.

But the greatest persecutors of other faiths are Muslim, themselves. (from Graham Partner's leaflet)

This is demonstrably true, but it needs a little refinement to avoid the criticism levelled at it by apologists for Jihad.

It should have read: 'But the greatest persecutors of other faiths is Islam'.

Islam sanctifies murder and violence against unbelievers and must be criticized and refuted whenever and wherever the opportunity arises.
To Macck: "for who ever is not against us, is for us" said Jesus.

Turkey‘s top Muslim cleric has stepped into an international row over Christianity on the Arabian Peninsula, rejecting comments attributed to the Saudi grand mufti that all churches there should be destroyed.

Mehmet Gormez, head of the Religious Affairs Directorate in Ankara, told a Turkish newspaper that Islam respected the rights of other faiths and calls for the destruction of churches went against centuries of tolerance.

Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/04/07/top-turkish-imam-raps-saudi-view-on-arabia-churches/#ixzz1rMcNJkRG

Youssef

"Robert, you screwed up big time this time. Graham Partner is an anti-Semite and an Iran-regime apologist... "

I don't know if that true, but one thing is one thing and another thing is another thing. Robert didn't screwed up anything, he's just referring to this letter/leaflet, to this news story, nothing more nothing less. The background of the people involved doesn't matter cause it's something very specific, it's about free speech, it's about critizicing the most violent, hateful and bigoted ideology on earth: Islam.

"Graham Partner and his ilk should be praised to the skies on your website... "

Nobody is praising Graham, you either have serious reading comprehension issues or you're just trolling.

their ideological paradise of multi-cultural, multi-faith, left-wing society is nothing more than a fantasy."

He can't get away with saying that he is hurting the feelings of every liberal, leftist and Mahoundian, with the word 'fantasy', how dare he?...Besides we all know Allah has no Partner, just three daughters...

@ macck

You wrote, rather bizarrely: 'Robert, you screwed up big time this time.'

Asking why it wrong to criticize Islam is not 'screwing up' by any stretch of the imagination. You also try the guilt-by-association schtick by describing Graham Partner as one of Robert's 'friends'.
You add, falsely, that asking why Islam can not be criticized is a 'glowing encomia' for Graham Partner. That's a bizarre piece of reasoning.

You claim to be a Jew, a moderate; but why should we just accept that as true? Your final flourish is to doubt Robert Spencer's sincerity by saying, 'Please tell me then whether your wishes over the last 24 hours for Chag Pesach Sameach were just words or whether you really meant them.'

I think you're just another Muslim troll trying to split the camp and make trouble. Strange how JW has been deluged with so many of these characters lately.

JW must be getting under Islam's skin! Jihad by the pen fits your attack perfectly, macck. After all, your self-appointed so-called prophet said; "The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr."

Not that you're much of a scholar!

The guy was a member of the BNP - that implies racist views - I think the broader issue is around freedom of speech - and even those with racist views - have the same rights.

In addition - what makes the case more bizarre - is that he copied the script from an article in a daily newspaper.

::

For many of the Left if you asked them - they would say everything is going fine with Christians in the Muslim world.

To read articles such as the ones we read are beneath them - so they automatically expect that their imagination should be substituted for reality.

There was an interesting article in the Guardian - Comment Free section - which went on about how wonderfully tolerant the Egyptian state and Muslim people were towards - the Coptic population - but this article coincided with a report - from some international human rights body - or the US religious freedom report - which spoke of the impunity with which the Copts are being attacked in Egypt.

And it not like these details aren't known or are hard to find - but if you cited any of this report's details - the Guardian - who couldn't be on a higher horse - would call you and everyone who dares posit the idea - a racist and an Islamophobe.

They have manufactured their own dream world about Islam - its laws and the treatment of others under it and they want it to remain intact.

Unfortunately though - their view has nothing to do with reality. Covering one's eyes and hoping that by not looking - it will go away - simply won't work!


As for Macck's "two-state" solution, we already have it -- Israel and Jordan. And Jordan got the lion's share; it's over four times the size of Israel. Plenty of room there to accomodate the Gazans and West Bankers.

macck,

Where did Mr. Spencer praise Graham Partner to the skies? Where did he call him a "friend"? All he did was defend Partner's right to tell the truth, a right which is obviously in danger in the UK.

"The guy was a member of the BNP - that implies racist views - ... "

Err... to a degree maybe, if you go to the BNP website- http://j.mp/aV9229 - they seem outright xenophobic, they're against ALL forms of immigration, against ALL immigrants, they don't differentiate between illegal and legal immigrants and between immigrants that integrate, assimilate and are respectful, tolerant and immigrrants who are intolerant, hateful, violent, bigoted, who don't assimilate, integrate.

Immigrants should be allowed in any country, legally, immigrants who want to study, live, work, contribute to society. It doesn't matter if they're indian, thai, latinos, black africans, polynesian... etc. If they're tolerant, if they don't try to impose their views and culture onto others then that's good enough, the immigrants that shouldn't be allowed are the ones like most muslims, who try to impose their views, ideology onto others, who are intolerant and don't respect the host culture. Even in their countries muslims don't have any right to impose their views onto others, universal human rights are UNIVERSAL.

A shame that the BNP tookthe path of hating ALL immigrants, that doesn't help at all; The irony here? muslims are one of the most racist and xenophobic people on earth!. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

I can see nothing untrue in the leaflet as it describes Muslims. Muslims love to wallow in victimhood especially after some Muslim commits an atrocity. One look at almost any newspaper anywhere on the planet will reveal the Muslim involvement in almost all religious violence on one or both sides. Muslims have lately been involved in bombing Churches
or imprisoning Christians over Mohammed cartoons.

One of the issues here is that if the BNP said the sky is blue - then are we going to harp on and say that's a racist view.

Further this man has left the BNP - never heard of him before - and so don't know his views - so therefore 'implies racist views' must be used.

Firstly - if we let him be mauled because of his former connection to the BNP - next thing it's you who is being mauled -

Look at the [CoE] church's position - aspect of shari'a law are inevitable - a system of law that discriminates against non-Muslims - which literally enforces an apartheid system upon the people who don't join with it. [Which Christians in Muslim countries - even Anglican - live under.]

And for this we must say we respect or be called a racist!!

And further lose the right to speak freely? To be denied freedom of expression?

The BNP - because of its position - would have trouble attracting broad based support - that why I think they are not worth making that much fuss over.

OT

Saeed calls for jihad against US to save Pak

Lahore: Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed has called for a jihad against the United States to save Pakistan and Islam.

“Come to us. We will teach you the meaning of jihad… The time to fight has come,” The Express Tribune quoted Saeed, as saying at a sermon.
http://zeenews.india.com/news/south-asia/saeed-calls-for-jihad-against-us-to-save-pak_768750.html

I think 'macck' is Death Mask with a new handle! Same aggressive stance, same insolence. Betcha!

Clown!

I think so too, particularly given the obsession w/ Jews being greeted for Passover.

This man is a true Brit who is doing what he feels he must
to counter the subjugation of Great Britain.

I support the right of Israel to be the jewish home of the jews,to include Judea and Samaria. I don't know what this mans views are on this, but in answer to Miss Petkoff and
others, we wish to control who comes and stays in our small
island without being called a racist.

We are grossly overcrowded and short of everything from water to work.By 2030 my white children will be an ethnic
minority in the land of their forefathers because of the
actions of HMG to strip us of our country, identity, rights
and culture.

Since when was it a crime for a people,proud of their identity and heritage, to wish to stand or fall by the sweat
of their brows and the free excercise of their talents?

One last point, no one should be called a Racist for NOT
wanting his country to be swamped by foreigners, was Ghandi
called a Racist for wanting India for Indians? NO, the time
when this word could be thrown about to silence and cow is
past, finished gone.

As someone noted, the "hate speech" Partner is being investigated for are not his words, but from some unnamed "national newspaper". I'm amazed that a "national newspaper" exists in the UK with such an unremarkably rational viewpoint as demonstrated in the words Partner quoted.

I'm also curious how that "national newspaper" got away with publishing those words, and whether they too are being "investigated".

Burag wrote:

It should have read: 'But the greatest persecutors of other faiths is Islam'.

That would be a misuse of the English language and of basic logic -- for the word "persecutor" denotes an agent (such as a human being, or an animal, or a god, or a fictitious character) of an action; and a religion or ideology cannot be an agent in this sense.

The second problem with your solution is that those who are unduly affected by PC MC will not be mollified by such an apparent softening of the stance: they will still call the person who communicated those words a "bigot" and sometimes even a "racist".

So I say we stop worrying about hurting the precious sensibilities of the PC MCs in our society and call a spade a spade. We're damned if we do or don't, anyhow. If we are thus going to be damned for clarity and accuracy, let's be damned!

I don't see any indication from that youtube video which macck linked that it was created by Partner. All it says is that someone named "alawson911" uploaded it -- and that same person uploaded 46 other videos (none of which I bothered to watch, except for one to make sure the person was not indulging in 911 conspiracy theory -- and apparently, he was not).

Everything I read that he said about muslims was absolutely true.As Pamela Geller says: "The truth is the new hate speech"

re the Muslim attempts to pose as victims - I recall Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali saying something pretty acerbic on that topic, and his remarks being published in a British newspaper.

It was discussed right here in jihadwatch in 2006.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2006/11/bishop-attacks-victim-muslims.html

Bishop attacks 'victim' Muslims

"THE Church of England’s only Asian bishop, whose father converted from Islam, has criticised many Muslims for their “dual psychology”, in which they desire both “victimhood and domination”.

"In the most outspoken critique of Muslims by a church leader, Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, said that because of this view it would never be possible to satisfy all their demands.

“Their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when Muslims are victims, as in Bosnia or Kosovo, and always wrong when the Muslims are the oppressors or terrorists, as with the Taliban or in Iraq,” said Nazir-Ali.

“Given the world view that has given rise to such grievances, there can never be sufficient appeasement and new demands will continue to be made.”...

This wasn't the article that Parsons quoted, but it does show that every now and again the truth *has* managed to sneak past the gatekeepers.

I'm not a Muslim, etc. Maybe I was too harsh on Robert. The vid link I got was directly from Graham Partner's blog- nowhere else. I always look into the people mentioned on this site, and Graham Partner's unsavory associations jumped out immediately.

Again, I apologize if I was overly harsh on Robert. But I don't think Robert's blog should be careless about promoting people who profess outright bigotry. I know many on this site hate Muslims and Islam, whereas my view is that the Muslims as a community need to be more forthright about anti-Semitism, anti-Christianity, other forms of Islamist bigotry, rationalization of jihadism, terrorism, and Islamic supremacism/imperialism, and I agree that CAIR, ISNA, etc. are merely shills for this type of thing and not "Islamic civil rights organizations" as they and (the now shameful and lying) Southern Poverty Law Center claim. But rejecting these people shouldn't mean embracing Partner.

As for Partner's "free speech"- yes, he should have the right to say those things, but Robert has an obligation, in the name of full truth, to display ALL of Partner's beliefs and associations before he (Robert) portrays Partner and his ilk as a victim. After all, plenty of people who are justifiably vilified on this site- Reza Aslan, etc.- could also claim victim status based on attacks on their speech and/or ethnicity. This does not make them people that Robert should endorse.

As for any ally in a storm (including anti-Semites like Partner because they also happen to be Muslim-haters)- get real. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

As for attacks on me as a "troll," etc. Expectable, given the nature of many of the regular commenters on here. I'm not naive and I know what web anonymity allows for, but many of the people on here are nothing more than vicious bigots with sadistic fantasies of violence but without the courage (for which we can be grateful) not to carry them out in real life.

The fact is that you have not addressed the freedom of speach issue. Partner has copied a statement regarding islam that is undoubtably true. He is now being called over the coals for it. I have no idea of all his political views but on this issue I would back him 100%. I don`t see why you should complain about attacks on you when your attack on Robert was needless and badly thought out. Anyway happy Passover and happy Easter.

I think ecosse14 has clarified the point very well.

Parsons may very well be a bigot, but he is being *investigated* because he distributed a negative article on *islam* which had been *already printed* in a mainstream newspaper. It's not only a free speech issue, it's about the *protected status* conferred on islam by politicians, the msm etc. A protected status afforded to no other 'religion.'

You said:

''... many of the people on here are nothing more than vicious bigots with sadistic fantasies of violence but without the courage (for which we can be grateful) not to carry them out in real life.''

If you're going to make statements like that, then you need to put your money where your mouth is. Give names, and the statements made which you consider to be examples of vicious bigotry aand sadistic fantasies of violence.

Jihad Watch has a very clear policy on such things, and if flagged up to Marisol, those comments are deleted. Note bene - such comments which have appeared in the past have very frequently been the work of trolls, and leftist apologists for islam, in order to smear the site, and give 'evidence' for their claim that those who oppose jihad and sharia are 'racist, bigoted, islamophobes.' (Such a silly word).

Bother. 'Partner', not 'Parsons'. I need to start previewing.

Well put Jan. i liked the way you unmasked the Mark Dast idiot.

Call me old fashioned if you like macck, but I believe in prosecuting people for what they do, rather than what they are or how they think. The contents of his pamphlet as copied here seem quite reasonable to me.

The U.K. is is out of control. A little while ago a member of Parliament mentioned publicly that he has put on a hijab and that in his opinion it was like wearing a paper bag over his head. He received a visit from the police and a warning about his racial utterings.

Darren Conway of Gainsborough was recently jailed for posting criticisms of Islam, including "offensive" photographs of beheadings etc. on the windows of his own apartment. He was no angel either, but thought crime really is a crime there now and the truth is no longer a defense, which in turn means that Britain is defenceless against Islam.

>As for attacks on me as a "troll," etc. Expectable, given the nature of many of the regular commenters on here. I'm not naive and I know what web anonymity allows for
>many of the people on here are nothing more than vicious bigots with sadistic fantasies of violence but without the courage (for which we can be grateful) not to carry them out in real life.

Tsk, tsk, tsk... that post started good but went downhill so fast, what a shame. That's the buffoonish verbiage and paroxysm i'd expect from a 4chan post, a typical anonymous user-probably a basement dweller- judging by his condition all while trying to portray himself as an internet reicarnation of Sigmund Freud, a FBI psychological profiler and Dr. Phil, spewing ridiculous, haggardish ad hominems; Like the other user said, if you dont' back up your verbal incontinence with factual evidence then it's nothing more than calumnies, libel and slander against this website, admins. and its userbase.

These type of posters are one of the most pathetic on the internet, ever. Why?, well there's something called 'psychological projection' a.k.a projection bias, look it up. The subconscious tricks the mind. A thief judges by his condition.

I too am under investigation by my local police in the U.K because I have anti-Islam signs on my car. The police have called me a racist and xenophobe.

I am not in the least right-wing and certainly do not support the rent-a-mob style English Defence League. I lean to the left politically and as all my publications clearly state, I support "sanity, democracy, free speech, genuine religious tolerance and multiculturalism."

At the moment because of a complaint by a nameless woman the police are investigating me for a sign on my car which states 'Isalm is a far greater threat to the well-being of mankind than Fascism and Communism ever were.'

The nameless woman from the city of Plymouth (from where the Pilgrim Fathers sailed) states the sign is racist. The police claim they must investigate because she perceives the sign to be racist.

Note the United Kingdom 2006 Racial and Religious Hatred Act, under the heading PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION states:-

'Nothing in this part shall be read or given effect which in any way prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism, or expressions of antipathy, dislike, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system, or the beliefs or practices of the adherents, or proselytizing or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practicing the religion or belief system.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter