CIA unraveled latest jihad underwear bomb plot from within

Well, for once Saudi Arabia does something helpful. Now, I hope no Julian Assange gets hold of the cable traffic mentioning who helped us on this one.

The Federal government and U.S. Pentagon have seen that military and civilians alike are endangered due to their inept, myopic view of Islam.

Our War Plan is to ignore reality and fall on the sword.

CIA unraveled latest jihad underwear bomb plot from within
........................................

OK—*ew*! Really, that's quite a headline...

I heard about this on FOX News this morning. Really, though, I'm hardly surprised that we're seeing more sophisticated panty bombs.

It often seems that the only "creative" outlet pious Muslims have is waging destructive Jihad...somehow, "Bi'da"—innovation—doesn't appear to be considered Haram when it's applied to weapons of mass destruction...

..... an elaborate espionage operation in which the CIA tracked the bomb’s movements for weeks and then killed suspected plotters in a drone strike after the device was seized.

Well done, lads! Now, I wonder if this attempted jihad attack might be added to the CIA training materials with the critical info that the double agent was readily accepted into the Islamic supremacist terrorist group because he said he was willing to die '..in the way of Allah', as per Al Qur'an.

In Muslim civilization there has never been any abolitionist movement,but check this out:

"The First Declaration of the Aboliton of Black Slavery,in Mexico in 1642,by the Man who Inspired Zorro"

http://www.antisharia.com/2012/05/09/the-first-declaration-of-the-aboliton-of-black-slaveryin-mexico-in-1642by-the-man-who-inspired-zorro/

AND ALSO

"One of the Most Sacred Hindu Temples,that of Shiva in Somnath,was Destroyed 6 Times by the Muslims"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/06/12/one-of-the-most-sacred-hindu-templesthat-of-shiva-in-somnathwas-destroyed-6-times-by-the-muslims/

"Article IV about the Enslavement of Christians by Muslims in Literature:French Novelist Lesage and Islam"

http://www.antisharia.com/2012/03/10/article-iv-about-the-enslavement-of-christians-by-muslims-in-literaturefrench-novelist-lesage-and-islam/

Hey Robert, guess what? people weren't supposed to know this. The New York Times at it again, putting America and its agents, informants in grave danger:

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/09/world/meast/al-qaeda-plot/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

But the NYT just doesn't care, the same scumbags who refused to publish Geller's innocuous ad!.

One of Mohammed’s Muslim friends advised him to see the Coptic priest and ask him to pray. God used that priest to cast out all his demons, and he was healed. Another friend suggested he go on the pilgrimage to Mecca to prevent the demons from coming back in the future. While in Mecca, Mohammed dreamed every day about that Coptic priest, and he saw the cross everywhere he looked.

Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/05/09/man-declared-insane-sent-to-mental-hospital-for-faith-in-christ/#ixzz1uMEOb300

Youssef

"Senior U.S. officials continued to withhold certain details"

why not withhold all the details?

@Peter

First of all, your post has nothing to do with mine, i'm staying on topic, talking about the CIA and the leaking of secret, classified info. by the NYT.

Second of all. Skinheads, nazis -and fascists and communists- are comrades with pedohammedans, they share the same pathological hatred for jews and Israel. You fail miserably trying to divert attention from pedohammedan 'shenanigans' and the topic discussed in this news story posted by Robert.

http://j.mp/aGJjhd

Also, please... reading comprehension, learn some!.

I wonder when they will hide bombs in breast implants ?? Penal implants ?

My guess us that the leak was intentional occurring after the operative was safely back on US soil !

Peters white supremacist were also infiltrated !

"The arrests were based on evidence from a confidential informant who infiltrated the neo-Nazi organization known as the American Front 17 months ago, according to an arrest affidavit."

They are psychos who can't trust each other causing increased paranoia !

A few of these corn dog rectal bombs get through TSA and you should just buy stock in AmTrak.

These people are possibly the stupidest government boobs I've ever seen.

Seriously, do you think letting us know that the capture of one bomb by one double-agent is going to alleviate the concern that this administration lied to us that there was no risk on the anniversary of the wiping up of so much doggie doo from the face of the earth?

Morons. When has one cell ever, ever known what the other members of the cell are doing? Do we think there was just one special order bomb being made for just one very special devout Muslim? Are we supposed to conclude that they got the only one?!

God, I just despair...first at those who don't know that this is no reassurance, and second at this incompetent government who cannot allow the professionals to do the job they really need to be doing.

Idiots.

Does this ring false to anyone else? The news comes out, then for several days there are taunts about "I thought the war on terror was over," AND THEN suddenly, the obama group comes out in one evening, just bursting with facts, and there was a double agent, and the CIA was involved, and the Saudis, and....

It reminds me of somebody tripping and then saying "I meant to do that." Maybe I've just been lied to by these people so much that I don't believe anything they say anymore.

Did anybody ever prove definitively that obama, not pantetta gave the osama order? Or that he was really, oddly enough, buried at sea? And what ever happened to Breitbart's autopsy, and why did his next-in-line Shapiro say it's all over, nothing to look at now, move on? Boy, obama was only hours away from being exposed when the heart attack happened...now that's some lucky timing! (Sorry for getting OT; it DOES all tie together eventually, y'know?)

Ladies and gentlemen

I observe that 'Peter' the Mohammedan-in-a-mask, formerly 'loveverybody', also formerly '45ch' is back here peddling his taqiyya-and-tu-quoque.

Neither Mao nor Stalin nor Pol Pot combined can match the death toll racked up by Mohammedan jihad butchers and human sacrificers in the course of a 1400 year rampage on three continents - Africa, Asia and Europe. Not to mention the millions enslaved, many of whom died due to atrocious treatment (to get an idea of that, think how the Saudi Arabian Muslims treat their Filipino and Indonesian and Indian and Sri Lankan maids, today; a lot of those girls go home in body bags, the ones that don't just ...disappear). Not to mention the millions who probably died because of starvation due to Mohammedan raids destroying crops, orchards, pasture and livestock.

'Peter' keeps harping on Iraq and Afghanistan; the vast bulk of the civilian casualties there are and have been due to mass-murderous attacks by Muslims upon those of their fellow Muslims whom they deem insufficiently Islamic, or the wrong kind of Muslim.

And let's not get into 'honor' murders, which are NOT the same kind of thing as the 'crimes passionelles' or family violence seen in other cultural groups, but which, rather, much of the time, seem to function as de facto human sacrifices, satisfying allah's insatiable lust for blood, blood and more blood.

Also, I observe that 'Peter' is conspicuously absent from the threads discussing the Mohammedan gangs who were preying upon vulnerable under-age non-Muslim girls in the UK (similar gangs prey upon under-age non-Muslim girls in the Netherlands, I understand).

Of course, in Pakistan and Egypt Mohammedan males regularly seize, rape, and forcibly 'convert' any non-Muslim girl or woman they can get their hands on; in one case in Pakistan a 13 year old Christian girl was dragged **out of her own home** in front of her family, by gun-toting Mohammedan thugs. (Which is probably one of the many, many reasons why 'miriam rove', above - who, for Peter's information, is an APOSTATE from Islam, shock, horror!! - speaks with such contempt of Islamic Pakistan, where things like that are winked at every day). Hundreds - and indeed, over the past decades, probably *thousands* of non-Muslim girls, many of them under-age, and also many MARRIED women - have been thus seized and 'disappeared', in Egypt and in Pakistan. (There are of course the many others who are simply raped and dumped - one of them was a toddler - or are raped and then murdered and *then* dumped, like so much rubbish).

And 'Peter' thinks we don't know that all of that predatory behaviour - the murder, the rapes, the robberies, the extortion, the taking of slaves, and most disgusting of all, the endless brazen lying - is not modelled precisely on what Mohammedans firmly believe to be the conduct of Mohammed the Warlord himself, and that therefore none of it - so long as the victims are non-Muslims - is regarded as immoral. No, not even kidnapping and raping a married woman is immoral and adulterous, so long as she and her husband are non-Muslim. ::spit::

Dumble,

you stated : " Neither Mao nor Stalin nor Pol Pot combined can match the death toll racked up by Mohammedan jihad butchers and human sacrificers in the course of a 1400 year rampage on three continents - Africa, Asia and Europe."

Comment:

If one compares apples to apples,

you have to compare the record of all non-muslims to muslims and

not just compare Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot to all muslims over 1400 years

Ladies and gentlemen

observe.

'peter', who has pretended to be a Christian, but who does not talk or write or argue like any Christian I have ever met, here or anywhere else, spends all his time here zealously defending Muslims and trying to deflect attention from the manifest evils of Islam.

'Peter' is a Mohammedan dust-thrower, here to waste our tim and to try to distract us, derail the thread, and chew up bandwidth.

Note how he keeps on mindlessly deploying the 'tu quoque' logical fallacy, and how he avoids examining and criticising the core texts of Islam that mandate warfare against and subjugation of and discrimination against non-Muslims; core texts that are NOT parallelled by the texts of any other major world religion practised today. Neither the Jews nor the Christians nor the Sikhs nor the Hindus nor the Jains nor the Buddhists nor the Taoists nor the Zoroastrians possess texts that are so thoroughly saturated with injunctions to violence.

None of the founders of any of those other systems - whether viewed as real or as legendary - was a mass-murderous raping thieving slave-taking treaty-breaking warlord like Mohammed ha-Meshugga, the Mad One (or, if Mohammed was a fiction, then what kind of person or group sets up a creature like *that* as their 'ideal man'? Who would write a book or deliberately create a mythos in which somebody like Voldemort was the *hero* and the model whom everyone was supposed to emulate and admire? Even if Mohammed as commonly envisaged was not real, he was *invented* by real people, by a mind or minds who - in setting up an evil idol to be imitated- must already themselves have said, "Evil, be thou my good").

Observe our Mohammedan-in-a-mask trying to pretend that abortion in the modern western world is the same kind of thing as jihad, or worse than jihad, or that we must focus on abortion whilst at all costs refraining from mentioning, criticising, condemning, or - God forbid! - actually *doing* anything to stop the advance of the Jihad (or rescue its victims) within our countries or anywhere else.

(BTW: legalised abortion on a large scale in the USA has *only* happened in the past forty years. Forty times 1.3 million still does not match, say, the estimated 80 million Hindus slaughtered by invading and occupying Muslims when Islam took over and ruled India).

I will make the following observations.

Neither Judaism nor Christianity sanctify abortion nor command it as a duty.

But Islam *commands* and sanctifies and praises jihad against non-Muslims - to subject the entire *planet* to the insane unlaw that is sharia, to exterminate everyone who will not convert nor accept the near-slave status of Dhimmi. Jihad, and the insane sadism of Sharia, is Islam's raison d'etre. Joseph Schacht summed it up, in his 'An Introduction to Islamic Law': "the Islamic attitude toward unbelievers is the law of war: they must be converted, or subjugated, or killed".

It is perfectly possible to walk and chew gum at the same time: that is, it is perfectly possible for those who regard abortion-on-demand (i.e. for nonmedical reasons) as wrong and wish to create more woman-friendly child-friendly societies, to do that and **at the same time** to recognise Jihad and Sharia as Evil and to resist, up to and including endorsing the use of temporal power - armed force - to halt Muslim predation (e.g. in the South Sudan . I know that at least one regular poster on this site, a devout Catholic, is *both* pro-life and *also* a fervent and active member of Brigitte Gabriel's ACT for America organisation. There are doubtless many, many more doing exactly the same - opposing abortion and ALSO denouncing and resisting Islamisation by every legal means available. I would like to see fewer abortions; I would *also* applaud (*because* I love life) if the Israelis, in order to avert a second - atomic - Shoah of six million people, decide to use suitablly forceful means to put a massive spanner in the works of Iran's little nuke project. If they drop a bomb down the chimneys of Natanz, I will sleep easier in my bed at night.

'Peter' is attempting to make 'resisting jihad' and 'stopping abortion in America' an either-or.

Why can't those two campaigns - for many, many people - be a 'both-and'?

I wonder whether 'Peter' would support stopping all further immigration of Muslims into non-Muslim countries, including America, Australia, Canada, India (mobs of Muslims are illegally entering India's West Bengal from Bangladesh, causing mayhem wherever they settle)? *I* certainly would; and I would see nothing unChristian about border fences, border patrols, and Returning to Sender boatloads full of Mohammedan males of military age.

Or does 'Peter' believe that Christians worldwide must, in order to be obedient to Christi, capitulate, bare their necks to the scimitar and spread their legs for the rapists and become dhimmis, handing over the jizya in order to be permitted grudgingly to exist - silently, with their crosses hidden and their voices subdued - as barely-tolerated chew toys, punching bags, scapegoats, milch cows, sex toys and, every now and again, Designated Prey for Human Sacrifice rituals? Dwindling steadily as the Copts have done, from a majority to a small minority? Not even the Romans at their persecuting worst, or the Chinese communists, treated Christians as the Muslims have done. The Roman Empire in four centuries never killed as many Christians as the Muslims did in just twenty or thirty years, in Anatolia in the 1890s and 1915-1917.

Muslims have been waging Jihad on three continents for 14 centuries, butchering and enslaving millions...most of it during eras when total world population was much, much smaller than it is now, so that the *percentage* of the world's humans butchered by Muslims in any given year between the 7th and the 18th centuries would have been quite shocking.

Modern abortion-on-demand has been practised in parts of the modern world - including not only the USA for some 50 years at most. And it is NOT taught and sacralised as a 'religious duty', as Jihad is among Muslims (Jihad - *any* kind of jihad - is sometimes called "the sixth pillar of Islam").

And let any come-by-chance reader, googling in here to this old thread, take note of the weasel-word 'self defensive' jihad. What, pray, is "peter's' attitude toward 'offensive' jihad? He seems to be entangling himself a little, here.

Most jihad is and always has been **offensive**.

But Muslims have 1001 excuses for *claiming* that they are killing in 'self-defense' when in fact they are not; they are just waging jihad, and making up an excuse for it.

They *always* have the grievance du jour to justify their murders.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/11/dangers-of-legitimizing-islamic.html
Sunday, November 13, 2011
The Dangers of Legitimizing Muslim Grievances

and this

WHEN IS ISLAM OPPRESSED? – ABUL KASEM
http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/IslamOppressed.htm

When is Islam Oppressed?
by Abul Kasem
20 Nov, 2005

"I am telling you that my religion doesn't tolerate other religion. It doesn't tolerate. The only one law which needs to be spread, it can be here or anywhere else has to be Islam."

**That** is what we are up against.

There is no religion extant that includes abortion as one of its rites.

But there are 1.3 million Mohammedans, a large percentage of whom *admire* - as pious, as religious, as admirable and to be emulated - those who saw off the head of a helpless, bound captive whilst chanting 'allahu akbar'.

And though Peter seems to think this isn't a big deal and nobody in the West should worry about it nor lift a finger to prevent Islamisation of the non-Muslim world, *I* think otherwise.