He says he has plenty of authorities to back him up. And once again those who differ will not bother to offer any of their own to refute him. Now, why is that? "Curtailing ‘immodesty’: Ex-lawmaker ‘decrees’ against female education," by Muhammad Sadaqat for the Express Tribune, May 6 (thanks to David):
A former lawmaker and cleric from Kohistan district, Maulana Abdul Haleem, termed formal education for women un-Islamic and asked parents to pluck their daughters from school, or else they would be ‘doomed’.The nonagenarian, who was elected to the National Assembly from Kohistan on the now-defunct Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal’s ticket in 2002, also railed against non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in the region in his Friday sermon, calling them ‘hubs of immodesty’.
Nestled in the Himalayas, the Kohistan district is picturesque, but also one of the least-literate and least developed in the country.
Fiery sermon
Maulana Haleem, who was an office-bearer of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl until recently, was delivering a Friday sermon, at Jamia Masjid Komila, on who is dayoos, or those liable to be condemned to hell.
“It’s beghairti (immodesty) to equip girls with secular education,” the cleric said, adding that those Kohistani parents who were sending their girls to schools were acting against ‘Islamic shariah’ and the local customs.
“The Kohistani culture does not allow parents to send their pardadar (modest) girls to schools,” the former lawmaker said.
He did not spare female NGO workers either.
“Some women from these NGOs visit our houses frequently, mobilising naïve Kohistani women to follow their agenda in the name of health and hygiene education,” he said, adding that this was ‘unacceptable to Kohistani culture’. He threatened them with ‘dire consequences’, saying that married female NGO workers will be sent back to their husbands, and the unmarried ones will be wedded to Kohistani men.
During his stint as a parliamentarian, Maulana Haleem had also declared poppy cultivation in Kohistan ‘in accordance with Islam’.
Keeping women at home
When approached for comments, the cleric stood by the contents of his sermon, and insisted that several Hadith books prohibit girls from receiving degrees and certificates in ‘secular education’.
He did not actually quote any reference though. Asked to explain how parents would be doomed for their daughters’ education, the cleric said that formal education paves the way for girls to enter the job market. “When they permit their women to work, they give them a free hand to mix with na-mehrum (men they are not related to by blood) – by doing so, the girl’s father, brother or husband become dayoos in the eye of the shariah,” he said.
Such people will never enter Paradise, he added.
The only responsibility men owe to women is their sustenance, and not education, he said. In return, the women should stay at home and look after their children and family members, he added.
Asked if Islamic states like Saudi Arabia and Iran were violating shariah by spending billions on women’s education, Maulana Haleem termed their steps un-Islamic....
RSS Feed
The way the above article and the introduction was written, it took me a few seconds to guess which country this was about. My guess was Afghanistan or Pakistan, until I saw the reference to 'Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal', which in 2000 was the Taliban's political subsidiary in Pakistan.
The last para - Saudi Arabia spends billions on women's education? That must be something the interviewer made up on his own - in Saudi Arabia, female literacy rates, as per Wiki, is something b/w 70-80%, far lower than that of men, and also, in the Saudi context, education is mainly about people knowing the quran, sunnah and other islamic teachings. Functionally, a woman who's only going to learn the quran and sunnah is better off w/ no education whatsoever - on that aspect, I agree w/ the mullah.
As for Iran, it's a Shia state, so how does anybody expect a Taliban chief to endorse what they are doing?