Germany: Cop suspended for misunderstanding Islam

Salafists have been making headlines in Germany recently following violent clashes provoked by a far-right political party in North Rhine-Westphalia, in which 29 police officers were injured.

What do we know about the "far-right" pro-NRW party? Are they really neo-Nazis? Wasn't it the Salafists, who injured the 29 police officers and allowed the counter protesters to take the blame?

On Wednesday morning German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich said the Salafists were in close ideological proximity to al-Qaida terrorists. Speaking on ARD television, he said, "We will not allow Salafists who are prepared to be violent to disturb the peace in this country."

whoops...too late.

"Background checks showed that he was a Muslim but had no fundamentalist beliefs at that time."

Maybe they should upgrade their background check critera to check for Islamic fundamentalist beliefs...does anyone seriously believe an Islamic fundamentalist is going to tell the truth on a police job application form or interview? And what about those possible Islamic fundamentalist holding positions in airport? military? taxis? political offices? fuel and chemical delivery companies? pharmacies? child care? schools? .... many opportunities to spread Islamic fundamentilism and the death that inevitably follows...

ProNRW is dubious outfit. People who just run on an anti-Islam agenda without saying much about their other plans.
They are extremist. People bragging that Monsieur LePen will join them for a conference (though he then didn't show up) are not the type I would vote for.

who was doing the back ground check? 10 year old kids?
M

Those darned "Salafists"! Once we get rid of them, we'll have solved the problem of Islam, and can more comfortably continue to embrace and swallow up many more millions of "non-Salafist" Muslim immigrants into the multicultural mosaics and tapestries of our Western societies.

PLEASE HELP.

Albert Lea, MN pediatrician advocates Female Genital Mutilation:

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION:

http://www.change.org/petitions/fire-dr-hatem-elhagaly-and-revoke-his-certifications

Muslims in the police force in any majority-kafir country is just as dangerous as - perhaps even more dangerous than - Muslims in the army.

Some commonsense re. the latter, from returned soldier, pastor and politician Fred Nile, in the upper house of the New South Wales parliament, Australia, uttered in the wake of the Fort Hood jihad massacre carried out by a Muslim soldier.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-11-09/muslims-in-ranks-a-recipe-for-disaster-nile/1135314

'Muslims in ranks a recipe for disaster: Nile'

"Christian Democrat MP Fred Nile has warned of the risks of allowing Muslims to serve in Australia's armed forces.

"Reverend Nile says last week's killing spree in the United States in which an army officer shot dead 13 people should cause "all associated with the free world's military forces to feel serious concern".

The NSW MP and former army officer said the Australian Defence Force could already harbour Muslim personnel who may be a threat to their comrades in arms...".

If they are a potential threat in the army, they will be a threat in the police force as well.

Of course, the awful truth is that never mind about the army or the police force, there is basically *nowhere* that a Muslim employee is *not* a potential threat. Think, for example, of the multiple murderous opportunities presented to ...the kind of person who cleans the toilets at a shopping centre, or who is employed to clean or to service a train or a bus or an aeroplane. On their own account, or in cahoots with a jihad gang, they can do immense damage. And it only takes one, or two, or three, here and there.

There was one jihad plotter in Australia, who was working as a *baggage handler* at Sydney Airport.

"Background checks showed that he was a Muslim BUT had no fundamentalist beliefs at that time."

Blimey, that sounds as though one should expect all Muslims to have fundamentalist beliefs.

No British or American newspaper would get away with using such words. I think we should get CAIR onto this case.

From the article: "Salafists have been making headlines in Germany recently following violent clashes provoked by a far-right political party in North Rhine-Westphalia, in which 29 police officers were injured."

What it should have said:
'
"Salafists have been making headlines in Germany recently following their violent attack upon police - injuring 29 officers - and members of a political party in North Rhine-Westphalia who were publicly criticising Islam."

It also emerged that the 31-year-old, identified only as Ali K., had worked with the police intelligence service, spending six months in 2009 with a mobile observation team who were instructed to keep an eye on extremist activity.
................................

Oh. well—this is just brilliant. I'm sure the Salafist kept a close eye on those "extremists". Good grief...

More:

Background checks showed that he was a Muslim but had no fundamentalist beliefs at that time.

They wouldn't know "fundamentalist beliefs" if they detonated a suicide belt right in front of them.
................................

So true...

More:

He has also admitted to having contact with radical Salafists who promote violence towards non-believers.

Among the material being given out were videos featuring speeches from prominent Salafist Bilal Philips, who believes that homosexuals should be killed.
................................

Bilal Philips is also fine with the "marriage" of small girls to grown Muslim men.

In April 2011 he was *banned from re-entering Germany* as persona non grata.

You have to wonder how many more Muslim police officers like "Ali K." there are, all over the West...