This was great to see.
Video courtesy Pamela Geller.
Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Sean Hannity believes in the “War on Terror?” Terror is a (political) tactic, not an “enemy.” Orthodox Islam is the ideological enemy.
Hannity would do well to interview Molly Norris, who lost her freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of the press, etc. And the FBI, whose employees number one value is to obey the U.S. Constitution, advised to lose her freedoms rather than to expect them to uphold their oaths of office and her rights as a U.S. citizen.
This isn’t a “European problem.”
“Radical Islam”(?) … to Sean Hannity: There is only ONE Islam
(only ONE Qur’Ã¢n … only ONE Allah)
5:73 Allah hates Trinitarian (i.e. Christians) & free speech
All things considered, it is refreshing to see that Sean Hannity understands the Islamic threat. He did use the term “war on terror” (the politically correct term for the war Islam has declared against the Kuffar) but he understands the situation Geert Wilders is in and the threat Islam poses to the United States and all free countries.
I do believe that others in the media are waking to the Islamic threat, but on the whole the Mainstream Media just does not “get it”, and certainly our current Administration doesn’t…
Laphroaig and Sheep Dip to ya my friend, we raise the glasses!
Yesterday’s Washington Post has an extensive article about Wilders which (unsurprisingly) may be contain misleading information.According to WaPo the freedom party stood against Poles taking jobs from the Dutch, and has a web page devoted to reporting Poles who “took you parking space” or “your job”
This story sounds very fishy. Could you please see that it gets addressed?
Antonio Chaves, I am Dutch and I know about this website, put up by the Freedom Party of Wilders, about reporting about problems with Poles in Holland. it was in the spring of this year.
Yes, there are problems with Poles in Holland. Some are here illegal. Some cause disturbances, while being drunk. There is also evidence and suspicion that not just Poles, but also Bulgarians and Rumanians are overly represented in the crime statistics.
And all Dutch know that Poles, East Europeans, do a lot of, often, or mostly, illegal work, that is cheap, and yes, the East Europeans enjoy a fine reputation as good, hard workers. As such they seem to be a big competition for Dutch people, or Turkish-Moroccan people in Holland too.
And for many, including prime-minister Mark Rutte, and me too, it is perfectly legitimate, under freedom of choice, to create a reporting-website for reports specifically about Poles, AND other East Europeans. Many of us feel it is unnecessary to report specifically on East European mischief, but also that it is not necessarily racist or discriminatory as opponents scream.
But, it was received very bad, by both political opponents and ordinary Dutch people, and of course by Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, the EU. They protested vehemently. And Wilders and his party were much vilified over it and a prominent member, Hero Brinkman, left the Freedom Party because of it.
This episode did leave me “bewildered” though, because shortly after this incident Geert Wilders also abandoned Mark Rutte’s government.
My problem now is that I supported Wilders” very legitimate and logical fight against Islam, or at least it’s totalitarian influence.
But now, the Freedom Party unnecessarily, in my view, opposed the Euro, the European Union, and Eastern Europeans (admittedly more criminal than average, but still unnecessarily).
It did this for electoral reasons, but all of the above is against my own choices, and well, the fight against Totalitarian Islam get’s only second place now, it seems, and is weakened much by the predominance of these other policies.
And especially, I feel, it is highly irresponsible and stupid, or indicative of an unjustified antipathy to Eastern Europeans, who should be our allies against totalitarian Islam. That attitude of Wilders particularly “bewildered” me. And I am not sure I’ll vote for him again. And in this I am not the only one, for the freedom party is declining in the polls.
Misundestanding of Islam? Misunderstanding of Islam? Misundertanding of Islam? Anyone can explained?
Nabram, Consider that there are:
Islam I: The Holy Texts of Islam.
Islam II: Then the influential authoritative Islamic Jurisprudence schools; shafi, hanafi, hanbali, maliki. And Al Azhar university in Cairo.
Islam III is then all the interpretations of Islam I + II. This is enormously diversified.
Critical Islam Experts like Robert Spencer, alarmed at certain aspects of Islam I, II and III, have for, say, a decade now studied, described and exposed Islam I + II, as totalitarian, misogynistic, supremacist, anti-democratic, untrue too and more.
Enter the so-called moderate Muslims and Islam-apologists, and also the Political – Correct people, influenced by Muslims or just of good will but ignorant.
The Islam-apologist endeavor to contradict what the Critical Islam Experts describe and expose as Islam and they paint a more innocent and rosy picture of Islam I, mostly ignoring Islam II.
But in the world it is now well monitored what all sorts of Muslims say and do motivated by Islam, as they themselves explain.
And now the Critical Islam Experts cynically say: OK, what the Islam-apologists tell us, is supposed to be the real, benign, peaceful Islam.
OK, but ….. then surely the Muslims who interpret Islam much more supremacist, much more violent, women-oppressing, infidel-oppressing etc MISUNDERSTAND Islam when they say and do words and deeds so contradictive to what the Islam-apologists are saying real Islam is.
The odd situation namely is that very, very often, very influential Islamic leaders, and hundreds of millions of Muslims, speak and act in accordance with what the Critical Islam Experts are saying and in contradiction to what the Islam-apologists are saying that Islam is and is not, wants and wants not.
But the Islam-apologists only turn viciously on the Critical Islam experts but mankind barely hears a peep out of the apologists when other Muslims apparently misunderstand the Islam of the apologists and really confirm big time what the Criticals are saying, by the words and deeds of these other Muslims.
FBI…Federal Bureau of Islam.
Indeed, correct, eliasx, but for me, and very many others, it is islam, truly fundamental, orthodox and pure, but EQUALLY, the mere EXISTENCE OF ANY DEGREE OF PRACTICE OR BELIEF IN ISLAM, or sect or offshoot of it, including bahai, any belief in any portion of it is necessarily the belief in the propriety of a violent, domineering gang, a myth as a religion, a masquerade of a religion, as an excuse to, and authorization to, execute the most criminal acts of mankind, imaginable and unimaginable.
It is a matter of EQUALLITY between the statements “There are no good nor acceptable nazis, there are no good mafioso” AND “There are no good muslims” The belief system between islam and nazism is hatred and supremacy, hatred over all others, and even their own lesser believers, and supremacy, of them, as being better than all others in existence, forever! THAT IS THE ROOT OF THE MATTER, always, as long as islam is not wiped out from the globe, as a viable and acceptable system of belief in evil hatred and dominance. And remember, a smoldering tiny core of evil, criminal, nazism, still exists, and frankly is nurtured at the teat of islam!
The only reason nazism was destroyed, and is not resurgent, tenuous as that becomes (remember “NEVER AGAIN”?), as the ages continue, is the POPULAR KNOWLEDGE of what nazism truly was and is, a kind of islam in sheep’s clothing (a slightly different breed of sheep, but still the same sheep, aryans, not arabs, et al), but only when people looked for the wolf, underneath, and came to know the evil that is nazism, as is true of communism, fascism, anarchy, and totalitarianism, and dictatorships. All those regime’s methods are bad and evil in execution, just to slightly different degrees, and methods. The same ends for the individual’s under those several regimes, exists, which is improper death, freedoms taken away, always, and lack of individual striving, always, and unending unfairness and degradation of minds, always.
As with the KKK, the mafia, the thuggees, nazis, some motorcycle gangs, and numerous other criminal practicing gangs, it takes exposure and education of the public, to learn the biblical quote paraphrased “you shall know them by their works, their deeds, not by their proclamations.” And of course, when the gang is allowed to go too far, too long, war, hellish violent war, as happened with the Crusades, Charles Martel, John Sobieski, Vlad the Impaler Tsepes, etc.
America practices the good it preaches, repeatedly, and seeks to improve itself, and does, and neither practices nor seeks imperialism, but islam always practices the crimes it preaches, for 14 crime ridden centuries, and can never improve, by its basic tenants and written requirements, and seeks imperialism the same as nazis, but writ larger and for all to see!
Righ on, EH, I was shocked when I noticed the great Geert Wilders on Sean yesterday, but oh so pleased to see the discussion of reality of islam’s evil, right on the public TV!
My fondest dream would be to see Robert get a ten minute interview on Sean and others, once a week, and occaisionaly, other heroes, including articulate apostates willing and able to go that public, every week, to educate the public on every criminal evil aspect of islam and fast.
For Miriam, Laphroaig and Sheep Dip to ya my friend, we raise the glasses!
I too am surprised and somewhat dismayed by this affaire re. the East Europeans, too, they being mostly Catholic or secular. A while ago here at jihadwatch we had a British poster – of Scots ancestry, I think – who called himself ‘Hard Rain’ and identified himself as having a devoutly Catholic Polish wife and at least two children, daughters. He said his wife was staunchly opposed to Islamisation; they were a team.
And we should never forget the Poles at Vienna in 1683; and the sufferings of the Romanians and Bulgarians under the Turkish Muslim yoke, and how hard they fought to free themselves from it.
Furthermore, I understand Wilders’ own wife is from Hungary. It’s odd that he would get entangle in this western Europe vs central/ eastern Europe squabble.
The ethnic and/ or religious feuds, divisions and antagonisms and suspicions between different groups of non-Muslims in Europe – as also in other places, e.g. the assorted non-Muslim tribes in South Sudan – are a luxury no-one can afford right at the moment; they are hindering and weakening the Resistance against Islam no end and delivering everyone into the hands of the Muslims.
It might be an idea, Demsci, for you to write a letter to Mr Wilders and to the Freedom Party and express your disappointment.
A more constructive thing for the counter-jihadists to do in western Europe would be to try to ascertain the level of Islamo-awareness among modern Eastern European immigrants and residents, and endeavour to get them on side.
Memo to Catholic western Europeans who are Jihad-aware; attend your parish church, welcome the Polish and other Eastern European Catholics if they are there (I gather that in Britain, for example, many Catholic parish churches have been suddenly filled with Poles), encourage them in their faith (which is also *your* faith), and then find out what they know about Islam and Islamisation, in your own country and elsewhere. If they don’t know much – if they’ve forgotten their own heroic history – remind them, and educate them.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Contact Jihad Watch
Spambot blocker question
7 + 9 =
Articles at Jihad Watch by