Taliban poison 120 schoolgirls and three teachers for the crime of educating females

CNN (video) Official: 122 girls, 3 teachers poisoned at Afghan school

Dr Karen Woo who saved 2,000 Afghans killed by Taliban
— Allah‘s willing executioners 9:5

While I am 100% in favor of us getting out of that cesspool ASAP, it does pose the moral dilemma of: What about the girls and women?? Do we just throw them under the bus (or rather, to the Islamic wolves??)

Here's a modest proposal - why not "buy" Afghan girls for adoption in the civilized world?? At $1000 each, saving a million girls would only cost $1 billion. Heck of a deal if you ask me, and then they will no longer be there as breeding stock for future jihadis..

Men that follow an ideology that promotes the poisoning of little girls.

We will return to fight and kill these men one day – or enough of them ‘till the rest have our absolute attention and obedience.

There is no other way.

Whining about how difficult it is, or how much it will cost, just puts off the inevitable.

"Last month, 150 schoolgirls were poisoned in Takhar province after they drank contaminated water...."

According to the great "prophet" of the greatest religion on earth, water is PURE and is not defiled by anything. (Dawud 1.66)

Muhammad used to make ablutions and DRINK from the well of Buda'ah, a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown!!!

http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2010/04/muhammad-and-menses-mahomet-et-les.html

Ah, Reuters bastaridizes the English language again. The term "conservative radicals" doesn't even make any sense. The term "radical" is best reserved for those on the far left and its complement for those on the far right is "reactionary."

Even assuming one wants to use the term "radical" for those also on the the far right (personally I avoid doing this because I think it's sloppy use of the language), calling someone a "conservative radical" is either incorrect because conservatives are main streamers on the right, not extremists, or because, assuming one wants to use the term "conservative" as a synonym for those on the far right (an extra egregious bastardization of language), "conservative radicals" then becomes redundant, assuming once again that the term "radical" can be used to describe far rightists as well as far leftists.

No matter how one looks at this, Reuters is wrong one way or another. Of course, what's really going on is the continued campaign by leftists to discredit the word "conservative," but at least Reuters could do a better job of pushing their agenda here. One term you'll never see from Reuters, however, is the term "radical liberals." Nope, you'll never see this one, not because of sound logic by Reuters but because of Reuters' agenda.

Strange as it may seem - there are a number of Western girls flocked to Islam. Afghanistan will have gone back to square one - can Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama explain it to us the worthiness of our sacrifices made over the past 11 years?
Let us try to get our ladies back to civilization before thinking about adopting Afgani girls. If I can figure this one correctly, adopting an Islamic girl is considered marrying her off young, so it will be hard to imagine they will ever let their young girls to be given to infidels - it is a kind of family honor thing for them.

So, either we should eliminate Talibans and their pathetic anti-female practice or we wash our hands come home and let them rot in their self made cesspool. Do NOT let anyone into the US from Afghansatn and pakistan.

Sorry to sound harsh, but really there is no way western countries should waste their limiited resources on any muzlums, female or otherwise. We have so many deserving and needy people among ourselves, this is where our resources should be spent. The izlumic world has made their bed, most of their female population side with their ideological bretheren, this has been seen time and time again, even in western countries with western upbringing, their females have conspired and sided with honour killings and every other rotten thing izlum has to offer.

I just can't bring myself to care anymore about them, we should take care of our own battered and abused women and children, not one more PENNY for muzlums, male or female; they want their precious allah they can have him!

Those barbarian brutes in the Taliban certainly are obsessed with female education. I guess they're terrified that a little education will encourage girls to reject their miserable plights as sex slaves, child brides, brood mares and chattel. The muslim male beasts always freak out when their lord and master position is threatened. They might prefer young boys to young girls but they all want sons, so women are a necessary evil.

There is no hope for these tribal savages; they are the rotten products of centuries of inbreeding and centuries of islam so it will take centuries to reverse the damage, if it can be reversed. There is nothing noble about the Afghan people although many self-hating, Western fools consider them noble savages, the purest and most laudable citizens of the world. And no, we don't need any more of these primitive throw-backs in the West.

Ah, particularly rancid news like this always brings out the best of the JW crowd. [/sarcasm]

Notice how it's the conservatives who are responsible. It's those damn Republicans

And there are people who claim the Taliban do not have WMDs. If they can kill their own women and children like this, why do people still believe they would never attack major cities in the West? The Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad has declared the U.S. conquered for Islam and would have no qualms about poisoning a major city and holding the country hostage with the threat of attacking another city (ironic since they have only two major cities, Mecca and Medina).

Our soldiers were there a long time.
No orders were given to build a safety zone for women on the border with another country, a bunker, a mini West Berlin. American slaves had the Underground road (I believe), Eastern Europeans had the Berlin Wall to jump through (many died, but went for it). What did our stay in Afghanistan do specifically for Afghani women? Nothing. They talked to the men. Some of these women will gladly have a country give them a piece of desert to live in,it doesn't have to be the US... they'll dig wells with their bare hands. Some of these women are so traumatized that they do not want to "breed", and they find men despicable and abhorrent. Some of these women feel abandoned and betrayed, as their safety and well being was neither a prerogative or a priority in our Afghan "mission". Inbred, burned with acid and locked indoors, they know now that there's life elsewhere, but no one created an open road for them to migrate, no country offered asylym in exchange for work in the fields. If that had happened, if our convoys would have secured just one road of escape, thousands of them women would have walked out. Just look at the Time magazine page from last year, Aisha, her nose cut. Her eyes are full of knowledge and bitterness. She was taken to the US and had surgery, but it was done in secret, she was smuggled ,... by regular people who cared.
Politicians do not really want to stress on that.... if they had empowered women and given them a voice, our mission in Afghanistan would have been a success.
Now all the news of abuse and death of women appear as isolated events. Well, every death in an Aushwitz crematorium was also an isolated event, was it? But there was a pattern of extermination and dehumanization, wasn't it?
Politicians are itching, they want these women to stay quiet and die quiet, it's too much trouble, for nothing.
I mean, they're just women, arent' they?

I can sum up the solution to Afghanistan with one word, "Victory".
That is what is needed to help Afghan women Afghan men and anyone else in that unfortunate oountry that needs help.
Wars cannot be won by half way measures. It did not work in South Vietnam, it did not work in the Middle East and it will not work in Afghanistan.
Do not try to tell me that 21st century armies cannot defeat a
bunch of fanatics who think they still live in the 10th century.
In WW2 we defeated the much stronger armies of Hitler and the Imperial Japanese, so why are these rag heads such a big problem?
The answer is lack of political will. The fact is if we cannot defeat them in conventional warfare ( a fact I still find hard to accept), we can end the conflict by bombing the country and making them start all over again as we did with Germany and Japan.
Leaving women in that country to become slaves to the taliban is simply not an option, in my view.