UK: Sikhs and Hindus complain about media use of "Asian" to describe Muslims

Good.

It's about time. This has gone on for far too long. Of course, I can't discuss this because I'm a whitey and my views don't count - I have been waiting for the right person, ie an Asian - to make a fuss.

Japanese, Chinese, South Koreans, Taiwanese, Singaporeans. Filipinos... every asian should speak up against this BS, trying to label them and pedohammedans with the same etiquette. What can you expect from the socialist Euro media?.

I heard about this a while back that the UK guys stack up all Asians together. I am a little surprised it has taken a long while for these communities to speak out. I hope they press the Government into action to do something about the media's disproportionate biasing in the favor of the Pakistani Muslim community.

That's barge pole material.

You don't want to be connected to that.

And besides in places like Pakistan - it would be the Hindu and likely Sikh girls who would be raped, kidnapped and forcibly married [converted to Islam] - all with the blessing of the Pakistani state and judiciary.

Over there everyone is 'Asian' - but as was starting to happen in the UK - Muslims [men] are given priority under Pakistani law.

The media will probably have to find another term.

I'm sure they'll think of something - look at the creative way they have worked to portray Islam in the news.

OT

Swedish TV station goes undercover at 10 mosques
(hat tip thereligionofpeace.com)

http://www.thelocal.se/40866/20120516/
Mosques' advice: 'don't report abusive husbands’
Published: 16 May 12 10:06 CET

To confuse the issue in Australia, the PC correct media now omits a description, while the PC incorrect media still uses the term "of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean appearance;" a synonym for a Muslim who is often Lebanese. Now it seems that it's more important to protect our "vulnerable and persecuted" Muslim community than find the perpetrators of home invasions, violent assaults, robberies, carjackings, drive by shootings and the sexual predations that are now daily occurrences that make life unbearable for the rest of the "multicultural community". As if anyone would confuse a bearded thug with an Italian, Greek or Spaniard. I note that recently, violent knife assaults of people in cars are described as as "road rage" incidents.

Given that most Brtish Asians are law abiding non-Muslims, it is unfair to lump them with the 'religion of peace' criminals.
The Orwellian lamestream media will have to find another politcal correct term for Muslims who wreak havoc in the name of their devilish hate cult.

And...it would be just as offensive to refer to muslims here in the USA as "Americans..."

Finally some law-abiding Asians have noticed they are getting poor treatment being lumped in with Muslim criminals.

In India it is called " Love Jihad" and common among Wahabi induced Muslims to convert Christian and Hindu girls by making them falling in love.

Absolutely! I have posted on many sites protesting at the use of the term 'Asian' to describe these muslim paedophile rape gangs. Asians, apart from muslims, do not carry out these outrageous crimes. Whether white, black or brown the one single common denominator is that they are muslims. The media are not that stupid - they know - but political correctness dictates that they cannot say 'muslims' in connection with any crime. This is simply moral cowardice and does nothing to solve the problem. Meantime, muslims and their dhimmi supporters are coming up with all manner of ways to show that the perpetrators, the paedophiles, are the victims and the child victims are the criminals. Sikhs, Hindus and any other non-muslims ( 'kuffars' ) are just as vulnerable and just as likely to be victims as Christians. Non-muslim Asians really do need to start speaking up about this travesty - it is not a racial problem - it is a muslim problem - now, which part of that do the media and government and police not understand?

The media is protecting its profits from jihad. They know the Muslim world will gladly seek revenge for any criticism of Islam or Mohammad or of any Muslim, and they want to prevent any damage to property or abuse of personnel they might have to pay for. It is amazing that the Leftist Liberal (supremacist) elitist seem to think they will hold on to their wealth if the global jihad succeeds. They do not seem to realize that jizya (tribute extracted by Muslims) has historically been 50 percent of non-Muslim wealth. When jizya is systematically extracted, Leftist Liberal elitists will be the loudest whiners and belly-achers and will demand everyone do something (for them).

This is now the Code-word or PC-Speak in canada for our MSM because they fear the Human Rights Commissions that are pro-Shariah and will rake them over the coals, plus, after the failed mass-slaughter plot by a groups of Pakistani-canadian muslims awhile back that the MSM fears for their workers lives and fears bomb attacks on their buildings.

So the answer to solve terrosims is to appease the muslim thugs and not offend their thin-skin.
The other MSM self-censor is the jamaican violence and gang murders in Toronto because we all know now that when the Police put out a APB for a killer as non-white with an accent and the murder took place in little-Jamaica, it's code for another Black-2-Black drug deal gone bad.
The ex-mayor of Toronto tried to solve the crime problme in Black areas by building basket ball courts , but that fizzed out when a guy was shot on the Court because the killer knew where the punks were to be killed.
Typical solution from the wealthy white liberal leftists like David Miller who thought Blacks could be tricked into putting down their guns if they saw a basket ball bounce by them. Truely and amazing white-guilt racism that the mSM never calls to the carpet for insulting all Blacks in Toronto when we know it's a Jamaican problem not Afro-Canadian one.

It had to happen sometime.

Media "neutrality" exposed again.

We Brits have no complaints about Hindus and Sikhs. Their deities, while no more real than Allah, Jehovah or Jesus's dad, do not advocate jihad, killing, converting or subjugating to dhimmi status. They quietly go about their business without demanding special treatment. They are quite right to complain about the blanket term Asian. The groomers are Muslim. Repeat Muslim.

Finally! Yes, Chinese and other Confucians, Buddhists and taoists should join the protest, in the uk and Asia. Boycott the British media.

Ruslan Tokhchukov.

If the UK media's terminology were really based on multicultural principle, they wouldn't victimize Sikhs and Hindus and other Asians just to provide cover for Muslims. So if multicultural principles of noble intent are not the motivator of the UK media terminology, what is? Pure terror of 1) being attacked physically and otherwise by Muslims and 2) being thought xenophobes or racists. Much of the UK media richly deserve contempt for surrendering to this terminology that protects only their own hides at the expense of minority Hindus, Sikhs, and other non-Muslim Asians.

But it's also been disgusting to find for years now that even the best of the resistance to Islam in the UK -- the anti-racist resistance to Islam -- frequently yields to this idiotic terminology of "whites" as against "Asians." That is precisely the way Islamic totalitarianism wants this situation framed. Why are you adopting the enemy's terminology? This is not about race, it's about Muslims against non-Muslims. If non-Muslims of all shades fail to unite in defense of a free culture, the UK will lose what freedom it has left. You in the UK should get it through your skulls, please, this is not about "Asians" or "whites"!