Always the victim: Convicted Muslim child sex trafficker says "my only crime was to be Muslim"

"What race is Muslim?"

The bigoted and buffoonish one.

Permanent offended Muslims!!

ALL what Muhammad ("excellent example" 33:21) did is "perfect" (halal)

(video) The Child Bride of Muhammad - 65:4
http://schnellmann.org/the-child-bride-of-muhammad.html

Ahmed said: “I will never accept that verdict here or tomorrow.

Tough, you'll accept it whether you like it or not!

"If an Islamic supremacist ever takes responsibility for his own acts of violence and hatred, or admits those done by any other Muslim, I will faint dead away from the shock."

I don't think you'll have to worry about that Robert... "faint dead away from the shock" because for the chances of that to ever happen is - 0%.

mulims and their blame game. it is gettong old.
M

"--not of the majority race,” he added....

Thank heavens for that! And, Heaven help us if it ever is...

No Muslim anywhere has ever admitted responsibility for anything, ever. I challenge Muslims to find ONE instance in history to prove me wrong.

From the infinitely slimy Mohammedtroll, who forgets that even if a girl is 'offering', a man always has the option of saying NO:

"No Pakistani went knocking on the doors in Heywood saying ‘have you got any young girls, can we have sex with them?’"

Yet.

In Pakistan and in Egypt and probably in a number of other places, the Mohammedan mobsters don't knock on doors and *ask* if there are young girls to be had. They don't ask; they grab.

They grab *any* infidel girl or woman (including respectable married women) straight off the streets. Or even, in one case in Pakistan, they come to the non-Muslim family home armed with guns, and barge in and grab the terrified 13 year old *virgin* and drag her off to be raped, brutalised, and 'converted' to Islam.

In the UK, they're not snatching the vicar's twelve-year-old daughter or his pretty wife out of the family home...YET.

But if the Mohammedan mob grows stronger in the UK, then one day they *will* do that sort of thing, besides doing what they do now - preying on the vulnerable.

NO kuffar female is, in Mohammedan eyes, a 'good' girl who is off-limits. ALL kuffar females are 'bad girls'.

If she's not dressed in the Slave Rag that defines her as a Mohammedan Gang Moll, she's uncovered meat and any mohammedan male who thinks he can get away with it, is free to grab and rape.

A number of the girls who were gang-raped by Mohammedans in Australia could not by any stretch of the imagination be defined as 'little tarts'; they were perfectly ordinary sensible Aussie girls who were unlucky enough to be on public transport at a time when the Mohammedan mobsters were on the prowl looking for something to rape.

Supplementary.

"Victim's relief as beast at heart of Rochdale child sex ring is unmasked"

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/crime/s/1581746_victims-relief-as-beast-at-heart-of-rochdale-child-sex-ring-is-unmasked

There is racism in Islam, the Arab race is considered more pure as Muhammad was an Arab. That is why rape is a standard weapon in violent, genocidal jihad, to not only convert but replace the native peoples.

This man is, in a roundabout way, admitting that it is his Islamic faith that is in opposition to the criminal law. Shariah law, which merely enforces Islamic principles, sanctifies what U.S. law criminalizes. Such things as taking non-Muslims captive as sex slaves is sanctioned and encouraged by Islam (Sura 4 and Muhammad's example), but it is a crime under U.S. Constitutional and any reasonable law.

“The girls were already selling their bodies. No Pakistani went knocking on the doors in Heywood saying ‘have you got any young girls, can we have sex with them?’"

What Mr Ahmed is betraying here is his complete lack of understanding of the nature of consent. He didn't go around asking fathers to hand over their under-age daughters (which is how it is done in Muslim countries). He went directly to the girls and asked them in person. The underlying assumption is: if the girls were on the streets, available to be asked, they must have wanted to be asked.

There is zero evidence that the girls were "already selling their bodies" in any other sense. They did not have prior histories of prostitution before they sold out to the groomers. They were only "already selling" in the sense that they were walking home from school or walking out to the shops, whereas a "non-consenting" girl would presumably be at home for the whole time.

Mr Ahmed showed no understanding of British law, which states that the age of consent is 16. If a child is under 16, then her "consent" is irrelevant - it is the responsibility of the adult to reject her interest in him. The confused law-makers usually turn a blind eye to a 17-year-old who prevails on his 15-year-old girlfriend, but if an adult over 21 exploits the "consent" of a child, this is always considered a severe crime.

The law did not pick on "Pakistanis" or "Muslims". Indeed, it went to ridiculous lengths to protect them unfairly. But in the end, the law, as it should, picked on paedophiles.

''DESPITE being warned by trial judge Mushtaq Khokhar not to reveal his previous convictions to the jury, Shabir Ahmed ignored the advice.''

Is this legal judicial behaviour ? I would have thought it was the defence's job to warn this scumbag, not the judge's, (who is clearly another mohammedan).

Anyway, thank God this vile monster got what was coming to him. It will be instructive to see what happens, if the case does in fact go to appeal.

My only crime was to be Muslim — which part and parcel includes a roster of other crimes; all of which, opn their faces, are heinous violations of society.

"‘My only crime was to be Muslim,’"

Always innocent and always the victim. On the other hand certain clerics and imams are declairing jihad on all non-Muslims.

Taqiyya is alive and will.

Always the victim: Convicted Muslim child sex trafficker says "my only crime was to be Muslim"
........................

Well, I suppose this is true in its way—sex trafficking and sex slavery of under-aged girls, Bachi Bazi and the rape of "pearly" boys, rampant incest, and the marrying off of girls as young as nine on the model of the "Prophet"—sexual abuse of children is part and parcel of Islam.

More:

Ahmed said: “I will never accept that verdict here or tomorrow.

“Myself along with my countrymen were convicted — this was conspiracy by the police. It had nothing to do with justice.
........................

That's because he does not recognize the authority of an Infidel court. It is unlikely that he would have been convicted or even charged under Shari'ah.

More:

"No Pakistani went knocking on the doors in Heywood saying ‘have you got any young girls, can we have sex with them?’"
........................

Even if this were true—and in the case of most of the girls, it plainly was not—this is statutory rape.

But these cases were even uglier than this implies. Read more here about the gang rapes and other forms of abuse these girls suffered. In one case, a girl was raped by *20 men in a single night*:

"UK: Muslim forced prostitution gang found guilty"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/05/grooming-gang-found-guilty-nine.html

"Judge in Muslim rape and prostitution case gets a clue, says gang targeted victims by religion"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/05/judge-in-muslim-rape-and-prostitution-case-gets-a-clue-says-gang-targeted-victims-by-religion.html

And sharp insight from Dumbledore's Army and Diana Summers above, on the kidnapping, rape, and exploitation of Infidel girls under Islam.

These under-age girls were 'already selling their bodies' - according to this guy.

If you go to the Muslim world - you'll see this goes to the heart of how Muslim men/and women think about women who are non-Muslim.

It is the norm to think of western women as prostitutes. And simply available.

Because without all of the restrictions - placed on Muslim women - which far exceed the clothing - and that lends itself closely to the idea of the woman as property - where if a woman speaks to a man - he instantly assumes she is under his control [- or that he owns her.]

So that Muslim woman and girls would be forbidden to speak to men - unknown to them for this reason.

Where older women in the west - would tell these men to F*off - the vulnerable under 16 year old - who happen to be in foster homes - or have serious family issues - could more easily come under their influence.

The under 16's are called jail-bait for a reason - you end up in jail - when you go with them.

Capisce!!

Last ditch attempt to claim islamophobia!