Hamas-linked CAIR demands that DoD drop ex-Muslim lecturer; Pentagon assures them he doesn't speak about Islam

"He does not lecture on or about Islam or any religious treatise, and his personal beliefs are his own.”...

That is exactly what he should be doing to educate others about the most dangerous THREAT to humanity, ISLAM.

What is wrong AMERICA? Why cant you wake up?

Next up, Hamas Linked cair will require all Western weapons of nations dumb or fearful enough, to be set to miss all ilamic targets.....or return to sender, even already, for the smart ones......

Funny, if ol' mo's al is so hot, how come he can't do his own taking care of his'self, in any matter at all. Nada, he can't seem to do anything, nada.

If all islams walked out on imaginary al, not a thing would happen to them, except by the hand of the pre-brainwashed programmed dummies of islam who were left holding empty burkas and niqs and hijs and their cold steel, who would be otherwise left without power.

So in the meantime, islams run scared of their enemy's (that's the West) military and security learning the truth of the large gang, 'till the gang grows big enough to take over. It's all about the gang, people, not mo' and al'.

No ol' al' will ever take over, in 14 centuries he never did, just the bully gang, what it is all about, and their imaginary BS al'. And in spite of ol' al', the West took them at Poitiers, and Vienna, and elsewhere, and much of the Crusades.

But the petulents of the gang have risen yet again, feeding on our outrageously excessive oil revenues, and of course they know no gratefulness, just their eternally required hate, for any reason of the moment at all, especially the dictates of the dreamed up book.

I wonder how many Nazi advisers Patton would have tolerated? None of this is by accident. Barakbar should be marched to prison right after Romney is sworn in.

So CAIR has obtained the list of guest lecturers at what appears to be a pretty sensitive DoD training academy? These names should be "confidential" at the very least and not subject to public scrutiny.

The village of El Majene Freha, has often been disrupted high voltage, last Friday. And for good reason, an altercation between villagers and religious Christians erupted. Our sources add that the two antagonists have failed even come to blows at some point.

Pray for the nation of Algeria as they want to close a church in the North part of Algeria

Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/07/27/conflict-around-a-church-in-algeria/#ixzz21oDeky6b

Youssef

The deluded and devious “Mohammedan slaves of Allah” at CAIR are trying to prevent any critical examination of Islam because they know that Islam does not hold up to critical examination.

To paraphrase Richard Dawkins:

"I and a great many others who have studied Islam in depth, regard the Islamic religion and its accompanying ideology as one of the great evils in the world.

There is a common belief amongst Muslims that every word of the Qur'an is literally true and that the Islamic religion and its prophet Mohammed are perfect and must not be criticized or subjected to critical examination.

There are millions of Muslims who simply say, 'Islam is right, and we are going to impose our will.' There's an asymmetry. I think in a way we are being too nice. I think that it's possible to be naively overoptimistic, and if you reach out to people who have absolutely no intention of reaching back to you, then you may be disillusioned.

Islam deserves criticism on account of the logical consequences of its dogma, namely, that the murder of fellow human beings is to be rewarded with sensual pleasure in a hedonistic “Paradise” - a concept born in the fantasies of an Arab warlord some fourteen centuries ago. The religion of Mohammed is a dangerous system when the teachings and example of the "prophet" are believed and followed."

We ex-Muslims living with Islam's formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know for certain that Islam is an evil religion/ideology both in part and on the whole.

Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

"One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur'an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way...

The statement continues,

Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified."

>>>

Ex-Muslim Ali Sina's ongoing challenge to Muslims can be found over at Faith Freedom.org:

THE CHALLENGE

If you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically. Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is a true religion. I will also pay

$50,000 U.S. dollars

to anyone who can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:

a narcissist
a misogynist
a rapist
a pedophile
a lecher
a torturer
a mass murderer
a cult leader
an assassin
a terrorist
a madman
a looter

...You simply can’t disprove them because they are reported in Islamic sources and as such they are as good as confession...

http://www.faithfreedom.org/the-challenge/the-challenge/

One's message trimming is another's sense of a capitulating enemy.

Back in the days when I had left leaning friends I did notice that any moderation of language on my part, rather than being seen as an indication of good manners or bi-partisan compromise was akin to the dutchboys removal of finger from dyke.

In it poured, a gushing torrent of negativity and my accomodation relegated to surrender rather than good will.

It's how both Islam and the left works. They score a self perceived point and from then on that's the new starting block. Until the next one comes along, that is.

Thus with each incremental shift so do the ground rules and before too long the ideological island on which you base a life view is reduced. And reduced. And reduced until you can take no more.

It boils down to either a stand or total wipe out. Capitulation or whatever it takes to retain self respect.

The West right now is capitulating itself into obliteration as it prostrates before that false image of diversity, Islam.

We are promised some florid fantasy of rich and diverse urban landscapes where the spice of the souk blends in a vibrant broth with western modernity but as we all can see, that isn't panning out quite as offered.

Instead we are witnessing an infiltration of unbending dogma and those famed bridges of so called mutual tolerance lead only to a one way street of shariah.

We may mincingly mince our mealy mouth words. We may dance around true meaning with euphemism and flannel but it's all a chimaera.

It's the mirage that both Islamists and their silly support cast of leftist idiots propogate. Give us a bit more and we'll be happy.

I can only apply the anology of Gaza. The Jews are gone but has that stopped the rockets or barrages of anti-semitic bile and threat?

The limits of compromise are well past sell by. A busted flush with enough evidence in a true court to reality and honest judgement.

Trouble right now is that true courts, reality and honest judgements are a tad thin on the ground.

We've seen what's happening with the Bachman quintet.

Mauled and villified, even by the dhimmis on their own side and merely for pointing out and providing rock solid evidence of that pointing out of MB infiltration into the highest levels of this administration.

The Orwellvilles of Washington and Brussels, dominated by the left have invented a whole new narrative whereby reality is just another mode of thought. An option in a vapid a la carte menu of bewilderment.

Meanwhile in the Islamovilles of Cairo, Tehran and Jedda they're rubbing hands and wiping tears of joy from their mirthful eyes.

Ten years back, who'd have thought it? Ten years hence? I shudder to think.

Islam doesn't give a damn what the west says or thinks. Why? Because they truly believe all non-Muslims (kaffirs) are evil and unable to escape Satans domenance over us.

Bullets and bombs wont ever change that ideology. It only confirms it. To defeat this sick upside down ideology we must find a way to debate in public. It is the truth and honesty that Islam can not defend against.

The west must stop asking Muslims what we should do. The west must stop asking Muslims what we should say and do.Commen sense should tell all western nations that much.

The United States legislators and administration should certainly know that much. But they just can't put the truth ahead of political correctness. Therefor they should all be removed from office. A good share of them should be charged with treason. And I know the perfect couple to began with.

I'm begining to think the FBI and the CIA should be independent from the administration and other such powers. Other wise why even have them? In fact perhaps we should do away with the justice system, military, and the department of defense and just let the administration handle it all? They are all puppets for the powers that be.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would like that....

The Quran is the record of a psychotic Arab talking to himself...That's why nearly everything Mahoundians do is crazy...CAIR should be called Crazy American Islamic Relations...It is crazy for the Obama administration to join Mahoundians in their insanity...but it appears that is exactly what they are doing...

Its amassing that an organisation like CAIR can force the PENTAGON to give up there rights to appease CAIR and especialy after all they have been through by having a plane crashed into there building killing people by a group called
AL-Qaeda who are aligned with the Moslem Brotherhood who are aligned with Hamas and who support or run CAIR.
America needs McCarthyism to bring it back to what it stands for in the world today. Your present President has no allegiance to the principals of the Founding Fathers of America the day he removed the bust of Winston Churchill from the oval office was the day I knew America was in trouble he has a diffrent agenda ? and its not in Americas interest or the Free World either. Lets hope you wont lose your First Amendment FREE SPEECH while he still Presedent as things are a foot he has invited the United Nations Arab Block to Washington to install new laws for the UN to stop free speech ie you cant criticize or complaine about Islam.
The world going backwoods we need help anybody ?.

Patton and Churchill on the politicization of the war:

We are seeing a "remake" of events that allowed the Soviets to occupy Eastern Europe, but with a different cast of characters. Winston Churchill proposed using what was left of German forces to oppose the Red Tide (which was supported largely by American war matériel). General Patton, also seeing the threat of Soviet advances, wished to see Germany act as a bulwark against the Soviets, and in fact proposed fighting them then because they had not kept their Yalta promises to not occupy or loot Europe. Both men were told to shut up. Patton was ordered to not beat the Soviets to Berlin. The result was not only two million German women being raped by the Soviets, but the dismantling of what was left of German industrial plant for shipment back to Russia – and not a few German rocket and atomic scientists being bundled off to work for the Soviets. Churchill's reward was to be voted out of office and replaced with a Labor Party functionary, to impose the same kind of socialism on Britain that it had just defeated. Patton (who had more good points than bad), who wouldn't keep quiet about the duplicity of the Soviets (who weren't supposed to occupy Europe), died mysteriously in Bavaria.

All this was the work of Eisenhower, Roosevelt, and other policymakers, who wanted to help make the Soviets look good. We are seeing the same policy at work in regards to Islam. "Let them make progress, Islam is just a religion, not an ideology." Patton was confident that American forces could not only stop the Soviets, but beat them back to Moscow. That would not happen.

Our current policies similarly favor the Islamic supremacists, who have made no bones about their intention to conquer the West. In the meantime, our military leaders are towing the politically correct line and purging its educational materials of anything that is remotely "Islamophobic," and releasing its best strategists.

http://www.natvan.com/national-vanguard/assorted/patton.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1209041/Operation-unthinkable-How-Churchill-wanted-recruit-defeated-Nazi-troops-drive-Russia-Eastern-Europe.html

http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Buchenwald/Liberation8.html

Anyone for Western suicide?

B..but Cair's 'fatwa against terrorism' clearly states that "It is the civic and religious duty of Muslims to cooperate with law enforcement authorities to protect the lives of all civilians"

Why are CAIR so obstructive when it comes to cooperating with national security? I wonder.

Also, I wish CAIR would clarify the meaning of the word 'Innocent' used here and there in their 'fatwa', it would make our lives so much easier.

1.] Our Leaders are failing us. We Americans are suffocating under a blanket of 'political correctness'. We're (we who are out of Government) bringing this on ourselves with our flippant use of our precious votes. Remember always the infamous 52% who put this Chameleon creature in that Oval Office, with his claque of do-gooder naifs.

2.] As long as Muslim activist organizations such as the C.A.I.R. are permitted to dictate United States Federal Policies, in the name of this lethal 'political correctness' we will be.... "hoist on our own petard".

3.] It must be forcefully shown that 'political correctness' isn't necessarily bringing in the political results needed for our national survival. 'Political correctness' must be revealed for its political shallowness and superficiality.

4.] Now, our problem comes when we don't accept that we are fighting our war against Islam and its Muslims also with carefully selected phrases and words...we seem to lack the acceptance of the reality that we're right now losing the propaganda war with Islam and its Muslims. We need a skillful propaganda arm up to matching wits with
those skilled in Islamist/Muslim word games. This is compounded when we face the reality of the intelligence level of those who so blindly voted for Obama. We need the acceptance of this reality.

5.] The C.A.I.R. (plus like organizations) is every bit our enemy embedded deeply within our current democratically elected government. We must accept that we ourselves have permitted this to happen. Not so easily done. This bit of twisted idealism must be replaced with the concentrated fury and anger which we Americans demonstrated against the Japanese during 1942.

6.] This, in turn, of course means that we've got to accept that we're a nation at war against Islam and its Muslim Fifth Column.

I confess that's an uphill battle in itself, but our very survival as a nation, as we know it right now, depends upon our facing these politically incorrect vital problems. Our leaders are failing us.

"Back in the days when I had left leaning friends I did notice that any moderation of language on my part, rather than being seen as an indication of good manners or bi-partisan compromise was akin to the dutchboys removal of finger from dyke. In it poured, a gushing torrent of negativity and my accomodation relegated to surrender rather than good will."

I've seen that too. There's a simple reason leftists and Muslims (both control-hungry fascists) are like that.

Like their father the Devil, they all know their time is short and the earth itself is passing away so - greedy, benighted souls that they are - they grasp ever more urgently and violently for absolute control of all, when in the end they'll nothing but damnation.

They know this is their father's time - that's what the Book says - so there's no limit to the evil they'll commit (even in ignorance) in service to him.

But the Book also assures us (and them) that their doom is just as certain.

What's wrong with being Islamophobic if Islam is a real and not a perceived threat?

From the post : " so that another 09/11 does not take place".

Comment:

the attacks on 9/11 would never have happened if the US government was not collaterally killing muslims in the gulf war in the 90s

which in turn resulted in the stationing of US government troops in Saudi Arabia

which in turn resulted in a nine year terror campaign by Al-Qaeda to get US troops out of Saudi Arabia,

but Al-Qaeda being tiny failed to get US troops out of Saudi Arabia, even after 9 years

and finally Al-Qaeda decided to attack the US homeland on 9/11/01.

Only after the attacks on 9/11/01 did the US government give in to the demands of Al-Qaeda.

The US government finally withdrew its troops in 2003, almost 12 years after the gulf war had ended

" This bit of twisted idealism must be replaced with the concentrated fury and anger which we Americans demonstrated against the Japanese during 1942."

Wouldn't that be nice? But Islim is not Japan, in any way shap or form. Japan wear uniforms and was allegiant to one flag and only one flag. The Japanees war mechine was clearly no ghost or hidding behide a mask, lies, moles in every U.S. Department of Defense, Judication system at local and Federal levels, The put all there cards on the table and said, "here beat this".

Islam has yet to show even 1 card of its war mechine. They've even masked their history from the west. That war was for land and power. This war is for their Allah (their God) and his prophet (Muhammad). This war is for superiority over all things, all they time. This war (according to the Qur'an, Hadith, Sira,) an ideology that demands domenation and subjugation through out the world, all from behind a mask of a lamb. To which the United States has bought in to hook-line-and sinker.

Islam not only gets special treatment, they are also the only political/religious group on earth that does get special treatment. Why? Because of political correctness. Why? Because the thing that Islam does best is, get the simpathy of others because they always play the innocenr victim card, always.. And it works very well.

I have been waiting for a drawing of a breaded Muslim with bloody saber in hand and standing over a non-Muslim, saying but wait I am an innocent victim to all of this.....In the court room the judge and press all agree likewise... And the case is dismissed that very second..

Islam has does its homeword. They know more about the United States than our judges and legislators know. Islam has a goal, commitment, motivation, an ideology and training schools in every nation in the world. The U.S. can only ask Muslims what they should do....

Islam also has control of our news media and net-works. The United States can only ask Muslims what they should do next...

Islam operates under nearly 50 flags and has at least that many allies. The United States operates under one flag and has maybe three allies nations and 75 Muslims as advisers....

And we Americans are making fun of them? Its only laughable if you are on the other side...

The U.S. used to be a tiger you didn't want to mess with. That was in 1942. In 2012 the U.S. is more like a paper-tiger in hidding out od fear because it has not clue how to defend itself. One thing is for sure jet fighters, ships, tanks, and old fashion warfar is not going to work.

Our best weapon today is the truth and total honesty....

In his tome 'An Introduction to Islamic Law', the great scholar Joseph Schacht states succinctly: "The basis of the Islamic attitude towards unbelievers the law of war: they must be converted, or subjugated, or killed".

'Peter' the Mohammedtroll doesn't want us to think about that. He wants us to focus on random non-Muslim psychos like the guy in the cinema in Colorado, instead of on the *millions* of Muslims who are being actively exhorted to Kill the Jews, Kill the Christians, Kill the HIndus, etc etc etc.

He doesn't want us to talk about Jihad, or the doctrine of Jihad, or the goals of Jihad, oh noes, we mustn't breathe a word about what Muslims believe, or what their texts clearly say they want, and what their whole history for 1400 years shows that they are attempting to achieve.

This site isn't just about 'how best to save lives' in general, as 'Peter'/ 45ch so disingenuously pretends.

It is about how best to save the lives - along with the irreplaceable cultural treasures - of about six billion non-Muslims who are being targeted for absorption, subjugation, or extermination, by one billion or so Muslims high as kites on Koranically-derived hatred, contempt and aggression, and currently using petrodollars for mosque-building, nonsense-and-lies propaganda campaigns, and weaponry, including nuke projects and WMD.

No matter what 'Peter' says, all of us regular posters here will go on relentlessly discussing and criticising the texts of Islam and the ugly fruits of Islam, which is to say, the atrocious behaviour of many, many, many Muslims.

If he doesn't like that he can lump it.