France: Muslims who attacked police refused to recognize French law

As the number of Muslims in France and other Western countries continues to rise, we will see more and more of this rejection of Infidel law. Muslims will demand more and more accommodation to Sharia, and increasingly ignore the laws of the secular society -- and once their numbers grow large enough, some of these Muslims will attempt to impose Sharia in its entirety upon the Infidel polity.

"Muslims Who Attacked Police Refused to Recognise French Law," by Cheradenine Zakalwe for Islam Versus Europe, July 28 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A couple of days ago, I posted France24's account of the Muslim mob attack on police in Marseilles while they were trying to do an identity check on a burka-wearing woman.
Le Figaro also published a report on it, which has some interesting details the France 24 account left out, notably those that relate to the Muslims declaring that they refused to recognise French law.

It is around midnight. Two police officers are patrolling in the IIIe arrondissement of the city, close to the Es-Suna mosque. They then see a woman dressed in a burka. As the law authorises them to do, they decide to check her identity. When the officers approach the young woman, she starts to yell and tries to strike one of them. According to the statements of the police officers, Louise-Marie, 18 years old, said that she refused to submit to the identity check "because she didn't recognise French law".
Immediately, a man of around 40, intervenes to help the young woman. According to the statement, he yells that "this was his place and the police don't make the law here." Within a few minutes, around 50 people are encircling the two police officers. Several of them start to strike them and try to knock them down. However one of the police officers manages to make a radio call to colleagues. A police woman arrives to reinforce them and tries in her turn to arrest the veiled young woman. But she reacts violently and bites her forearm....

« Previous Entry | Home Page | Next Entry »

26 Comments

| Leave a comment

exsgtbrown | July 29, 2012 1:49 PM | Reply

If you don't obey Muslim law in Muslim countries you will find yourself either in prison or just graveyard dead...

John David Galt | July 29, 2012 2:04 PM | Reply

I hope this starts happening to TSA "agents" in the US. It is the only way we'll get our Bill of Rights back from the terrorists.

Sam Arisan | July 29, 2012 2:26 PM | Reply

And OBAMA says "I will not tolerate any unfair criticism of ISLAM" This guy is our president. I am ashamed.

Istanbul_Chick | July 29, 2012 2:33 PM | Reply

I find it interesting that the burka'd bint was named "Louise-Marie" and one of the thugs that came to her "rescue" was named "Michel."

When other groups, religious or otherwise, inspire or command it's adherents to reject the laws of the country of residence, they are deemed subversive and dangerous.

Yet again we have another, out of many, case of islam being the impetus for non-muslim converts shirking and outright defying the laws of their native country. And yet again, islam is given a free pass.

Enough is enough.

Anushirvan | July 29, 2012 2:53 PM | Reply

Maybe you should write an article about Al Wala wal Bara and send it to politicians and MSM journos alike. Because that's basically what this is all about: Al Wala wal Bara in action.

Isabella | July 29, 2012 3:56 PM | Reply

"she refused to submit to the identity check "because she didn't recognise French law".

Well, the solution is simple : you do no want to obey the laws that exist in France for French people, then you cannot live in France. That burka lady has chosen that she cannot respect the law in France, then she should leave France. Enough is enough with people who want to cause trouble.
France wake up and Hollande stand up.

Wellington | July 29, 2012 4:43 PM | Reply

Invite the Mohammedan into your country and this is what you can expect.

JDC | July 29, 2012 6:02 PM | Reply

I really pray that i am WRONG..
I would be HAPPY if i am wrong..
Wrong about muslim intentions in our nation
Wrong about obama beingt an illegal muslim
Wrong about the liberals total quest to destroy america as we know it..
Wrong that DHS isnt buying 450 MILLION rounds of ammunition
(more than enough to kill every one 1.5 times) in the usa..

I PRAY that i am wrong about all of these ominious signs
i really do..

For peace is always much better than violence or even worse attacks or open warfare..

But you know what scares me the most about all of this

The sheer fact that the police cannot handle these muslims (who are unarmed) shows me that when the Crap hits the fan here (either economically or judicially or worse politically)

I guarantee you this..
I pray that i am wrong because the only other option i have is to believe that the muslims, along with their liberal supporters (useful idiots).. will try to destroy our nation

All to sacrifice our freedoms to allah on the alter of liberal tolerance..

I pray i am wrong for i would be happy to admit it..

ala sux | July 29, 2012 6:24 PM | Reply

The muslim Tamils in Toronto , canada assaulted the Cops and used babies as human shields to storm a highway and occupy it for almost 9 hours to show support for the Tamil-Tigers TERRORISTS back home.

Most muslims in canada do NOT suppport canada's laws , but, the Liberal leftist white Politicians have bought the Taqqiayah and visit the Mosques for a Photo-OP to show how peaceful islam is.
Most muslims love the welfare cheques from the infidels and jewish taxpayer each month, but as for becoming canada they spit on canada and want Shariah law under a caliphate.
Sure canada has a few "Moderates" that cling to the myth that islam was-and can be- utopic and will return to its glory once all the Misunderstanders are gone. But, there are 99.9996% of the worlds muslims outside of canada that should not be judge by the actions of a few Moderates with peaceful English Qurans. There is at least 300'000'000 msulim that embrace armed jihad and Shariah law that want it for the world.

I wanted to be fair with islam after 9/11 , but 10 years of a near 20'000 acts of Terrorism by muslims to other muslims says more in Volumes than any Volumes of islam books that claim to offer peace and love.
It's a death-cult started by a misogynistic/pedophile orphan that heard voices in his head to rape a little girls and kill the Jooooos.

Stop all muslim immigration and deport the radical Imams, actually , all Imams currently because there doesn't seem to be any Peaceful Mosques that opens their doors on friday to expose what the spew to the Moderate.

gerard | July 29, 2012 7:00 PM | Reply

France, and other Western countries, have to decide what they want their future to be. If they want their future to be Islamic, then they should just carry on as they are. If they want their future to be democratic/Judaeo-Christian/rational then they will have to deal with Islam. My own view is that Islam should be banned since it is clearly destructive of every value that Western Civilisation has held and holds dear. Banning Islam won't be easy and will probabably involve the use of force. But conflict is coming anyway. The longer the problem is not dealt with the bigger it grows and the harder and more violent it will be to deal with. A very firm "no" must be said to Islam. They won't like it. Too bad. As others have said: If you don't like this country then leave. If you choose to live here then you must obey our laws. These laws must be enforced, especially where muslims are concerned. Time to get tough.

CapitalistGig | July 29, 2012 7:55 PM | Reply

It's been over in France for years.

pdxnag replied to comment from gerard | July 29, 2012 7:58 PM | Reply

It is impossible to ban what people believe.

You can however treat the embrace of Islam and loyalty to the Islamic Ummah just like you would the renunciation of citizenship loyalty by someone who chooses to become French. And you can insist on immediate emigration. (* * * so long as there is some patch of Sharia-compliant land that is as large -- I suppose -- as present day Israel * * *)

Could I ban the fraud of claiming the existence of perpetual life? This is not possible. I can only make an assessment of conduct that is benign or not. Islam is today uniquely hostile, indeed hyperhostile, to freedom. This is revealed by the conduct of some, and by public pronouncement of affiliation by others.

Deport. Assimilate and embrace and protect freedom for all, or get deported. It is a choice.

If Ibrahim Hooper had to emigrate as part of his conversion would he have chosen to not convert?

If the headbag girls and their violent male slave-masters faced immediate deportation would they choose instead to assimilate?

blangwort | July 29, 2012 8:19 PM | Reply

@pdxnag: Precisely! They are not in an Islamic Paradise any more.

When in Rome, do as Romans do. When in Saudi Arabia, do as Saudis do. And when in a Western Country, their laws apply.

If anyone from anywhere should refuse this simple concept, do not admit them. This should be explained to them upon entry and it should be on their visa form. If they refuse, send them back. I can guarantee that it will be cheaper to do that than to prosecute them for whatever misdeeds their arrogant views will put upon them.

Nevertheless, I doubt most countries would be willing to implement such a simple measure.

John Magee | July 29, 2012 8:58 PM | Reply

The English Catholic historian Hillaire Belloc (his mother was French) wrote an excellent book in 1936 entitled "The Great Heresies". His chapter about Islam is prophetic for 2012 since it was written by Belloc before the publication of his book over 75 years ago:

"Millions of modern people of the white civilization-that is, the civilization of Europe and America- have forgotten all about Islam. They never come in contact with it. They take for granted that it is decaying, and that, anyway, it is just a foreign religion which will not concern them. It is, as a fact, the most formidable and persistent enemy which our civilization has had, and may at any moment become as large a menace in the future as it has been in the past."

This book is available on Amazon and on Ebay.

pennswoodswest replied to comment from ala sux | July 29, 2012 9:28 PM | Reply

The morning of September 11,2001 should have been a screaming siren about the meaning of Islam and it's 1,400 year old dream to convert the world, especially the Christian West, to Islam using Jihad. Instead, after 911, the liberal and left wing media in Europe and even in Canada gleefully twisted the meaning of the attacks on the WTC, the Pentagon, and that plane that crashed into a field in Pennsylvania into an 8 year long hate American and hate Bush circus and full of lies and amazing conspiracy fantasies. I guess when Canadians faced their own brush with a possible 911 on their own soil after those radical Muslims were caught planning to blow up the RCMP Headquarters in Toronto and your Houses of Parliament in Ottawa that dropped the scales from your eyes. Welcome to the horrible reality of Islamic Jihad 21st century style.

www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003546219302 | July 30, 2012 3:16 AM | Reply

Thousands of hardcore Muslims chant against Jews. Youths rampage through cities at night in protest of “blasphemous” art. A sit-in by religious students degenerates into fist fights and the desecration of Tunisia’s flag.

Youssef

Steffen Larsen | July 30, 2012 3:47 AM | Reply

In this age of the mobile phone and instant communication it doesn't even have to be a set-up anymore.

Steffen Larsen | July 30, 2012 4:15 AM | Reply

In these days of the mobile phone and instant communication it doesn't even have to be a set-up.

I read an interesting piece in the newspaper the other day. A large group of young Danes had gathered and were minding their own business and their own interests: hot cars. An uninvited group of Arabs turned up armed with chains and iron rods and began began the crap out of everyone: they mistakenly had assumed the young Danes were some of their "enemies". Now, the headline would make everyone believe it was a mere scuffle between to groups of equally responsible "youths". Only be reading the article it became clear the young Danes were victims and victims only and only thought of one thing: to get away as fast as possible.
What I am saying: everything can be twisted and half-truths can hide many a truth. Never satisfy yourself with the headline in big print, such as "Sectarian violence in Nigeria".

gerard replied to comment from pdxnag | July 30, 2012 7:36 AM | Reply

Indeed, you cannot ban peoples' beliefs but you can ban institutions and behaviours. eg polygamy was not allowed for Mormons.
Islam could effectively be banned.
1. Close the mosques. Demolish them. Close the Madrassas.
2. Ban the Koran. Make the possession of the Koran an offence, which it is anyway if you read it. Confiscate all copies of the Koran and dump them in the nearest ocean.
3. Arrest the Imams. Deport them if they refuse to give up Islam.
4. Ban the Burkha and those silly white hats the men wear. Ban any outward expression of Islam such as public islamic prayers: "Allahu Akhbar" etc.
What people do in the privacy of their own homes is their own business.
4. Stop immigration from Islamic countries.
5. As far as possible cease trading with Islamic countries.
6. Seek energy independence. Stop giving petro-dollars to our enemies.
7. Stop aid to enemy (Islamic) countries.
8. Ban Muslims from Police and Military and any sensitive areas such as Airports.
9. Ban Muslims from holding any political office or having access to any sensitive information. ie Muslims should not be allowed in FBI or CIA or any other or any Governmental Department.
10.Job done.

Les Dessins replied to comment from John Magee | July 30, 2012 12:51 PM | Reply

Thanks, John Magee, for that Hillaire Belloc mention. Will read it as soon as I can. Off-Post, but relevant: I believe that in the movie "Raiders of The Lost Arc,' the French man is named Belloc... Belloc wants to get his hands on 'the mouthpiece for talking to God' and he and Indy have some issues. But the choice of the character's name is no coincidence.

Anyway, the Muslims are going to crash a jumbo jet into The Louvre. That will happen. They will blow up The Louvre and the whole world will watch the art museum burning up in a jet fuel fire. www.lesdessins.com

Stuart Parsons | July 30, 2012 3:22 PM | Reply

Oh dear me. Another storm in a teacup. We can be sure the many moderate Muslims in Marseilles will point out to their more militant co-religionists that it is not right to hinder the police in the execution of their duty. Perhaps Allah will send a revalation informing His submissives that they should cooperate fully with the police and French law. Remember the word ISLAM means PEACE.... doesn't it ?

I am sure Allah's 'Prophet and Messenger' was most upset to,learn that his 'in life' peaceful example is not being followed in Marseilles.

Brandon O'Connor replied to comment from gerard | July 30, 2012 6:46 PM | Reply

"My own view is that Islam should be banned since it is clearly destructive of every value that Western Civilisation has held and holds dear."

-----------------------------------------

Cannot agree more.

nth replied to comment from ala sux | July 31, 2012 5:32 AM | Reply

I'm pretty sure Tamils are largely Hindu and the majority Sinhalese are Buddhist. More of an ethnic/political battle there. Definitely terrorists though!

Jan replied to comment from pdxnag | July 31, 2012 6:39 PM | Reply

You said:

''It is impossible to ban what people believe''.

Very true. It is, however, possible to ban them from forcing their beliefs on others. The laws are there, they simply need to be applied without fear or favour, and with stringency. Our 'leaders' get away with their pusillanimity because not enough of us are getting angry, and demanding *our* rights, and *organising.*

However, more and more of us *are* getting angry. Hence the growth in groups like the EDL in my country, and the British Freedom Party, the sterling work done by Ms. Geller and Mr. Spencer, Geert Wilders, and many more.

But, hence *also*, the determined demonisation of our position by the Left, the majority of the msm, and those on the Right who put political careers before what *is right.*

So we just have to keep fighting for what we *know* is right, and never give in.

You also say:

''If Ibrahim Hooper had to emigrate as part of his conversion would he have chosen to not convert?''

I expect he would have simply lied, and carried on working underground. At least groups like CAIR etc are out in the open. What needs to be done is the *will* to enforce the laws *we already have.* If CAIR had immediately been dealt with for treason when they told people not to co-operate with the FBI, what would have been the result ?

''If the headbag girls and their violent male slave-masters faced immediate deportation would they choose instead to assimilate?''

Again, they could simply pretend ! You can't really force people to assimilate, any more than you can ''ban belief.'' What we can do, is *force people to obey the laws of the country they live in.* And make the penalties for refusing to obey the law, *immediately* painful and unpleasant.

If laws are passed making the wearing of a veil in public illegal, and infractions are immediately *enforced, stringently*, what will be the result ? If that French woman is charged, not only with refusing to remove the veil, but also for *assaulting* a police officer, and is immediately jailed, and fined, what message is being sent ?

If, every time muslims try to force us to bend/change our laws in their favour, we simply *refuse* to bend or change, what will be the result ? If the IOC had simply said to the Saudis, ''no, if you're not prepared to comply with the judo rules, you cannot compete.'' What would have been the result ?

If my government had simply *refused* to countenance 'sharia' courts in the UK, what would have been the result ?

The muslims can believe whatever rubbishy, vicious claptrap they like, for all I care. But they *must* be forced to comply with our laws. If they simply refuse to do so, we arrest, try, and imprison. Found guilty, all benefits are taken away, and once sentences have been served, if they break the law once more, out they go. Strip them of citizenship, and send them to a sharia state, where they can live under the law they prefer.

But for any of the above to happen, we have to kick our governments up the arse. And *never* give in.

gravenimage | August 1, 2012 2:26 PM | Reply

France: Muslims who attacked police refused to recognize French law
...................................

This is standard for pious Muslims—all they recognize is Shari'ah law.

But as they near 10% of the population in France, Muslims are becoming more brazen.

When the officers approach the young woman, she starts to yell and tries to strike one of them. According to the statements of the police officers, Louise-Marie, 18 years old, said that she refused to submit to the identity check "because she didn't recognise French law".
...................................

"Louise-Marie"? Must be a convert. I wonder what she calls herself now? You can bet it isn't "Louise-Marie"...

Immediately, a man of around 40, intervenes to help the young woman. According to the statement, he yells that "this was his place and the police don't make the law here."
...................................

Enforcing Muslim "No-Go" zones...

Within a few minutes, around 50 people are encircling the two police officers. Several of them start to strike them and try to knock them down.
...................................

That most Islamic phenomenon—the "instant mob". Ready at a moment's notice to burn down Christians' homes in Dar-al-Islam, or to attack the police in Dar-al-Harb...

However one of the police officers manages to make a radio call to colleagues. A police woman arrives to reinforce them and tries in her turn to arrest the veiled young woman. But she reacts violently and bites her forearm....
...................................

*Bites her*. Muslim savagery in action...

dumbledoresarmy replied to comment from gravenimage | August 2, 2012 1:29 AM | Reply

Y'know what gets me about the *biting*?

As you already remarked, this isn't a born-Muslim.

This isn't someone steeped in Muslim suspicion and aggression from birth.

This is someone who grew up French: Louise-Marie is a classic French name. Even if she was Caribbean French, the name bespeaks at least a nominal Christian or a secular background.

One wonders: was she *always* the kind of out-of-control person who would bite a policewoman, and who has therefore gravitated to Islam out of a kind of spiritual suction, *attracted* by its viciousness that repels most normal, sane non-Muslims?

Or did she get into Islam by, say, 'marriage jihad', or drift into it out of sheer idiocy, and then...*become* violent as a result of absorbing its full malignity after her conversion/ recruitment?

As for the 'insta-mob'...want to bet that this whole thing might have been a set-up, an ambush, from the start?

The Mohammedans know about the French law against the burqa.

They know that the police - if conscientious - *will* attempt to enforce it.

So they send out the new or recent convert as a 'goat', in the burqa, and..*the Muslim male mob is lurking in the wings ready to pounce*.

Two cops versus **fifty** Mohammedan males. I don't know whether French cops are armed; but if they are mustering up their courage to enforce the law, for example by enforcing the burqa ban, they are going to *have* to be armed, and they are going to have to be prepared to shoot to kill, if necessary, if they don't want to be lynched and torn limb from limb, like those two Israeli reservists were in Ramallah, not so very many years ago.

I would advise the French police to *assume* that the insta-mob is going to appear *whenever* a Slave-Sacked/ Slave-Masked female is apprehended; and, therefore, to be prepared to deploy overwhelming force immediately. And: always, always, always take a couple of big black dogs on patrol with them.

I recall that a couple of years ago, the Aussie police had to execute a series of search warrants on Mohammedan-inhabited premises, during Ramadan.

When each team went in the Riot Squad, complete with dogs and helicopter backup, was prominently in evidence, as backup; confronted from the start with a display of overwhelming force, the Mohammedans pulled in their horns.

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

FrontPageMag.com

Books by Robert Spencer

The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert Spencer

Islamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian Future

Muslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer

The Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks

“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
— Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
— Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
— Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
— Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
— Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
— Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
— Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
— Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
— Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
— Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
— Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
— Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
— Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
— Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
— Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
— Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
— New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
— Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
— New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
— Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
— Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
— Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
— Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
— Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
— Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
— Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
— Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”