Islamic antisemitism is still illegal in California. How long before Hamas-linked CAIR cries "Islamophobia"?
An update on this story. "California Hotel Found Liable in Civil Rights Case," by Michael Cieply in the New York Times, August 15 (thanks to Kenneth):
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — A jury in a state court here found the Hotel Shangri-La, an ocean-view stop for the Hollywood set, and Tehmina Adaya, its proprietor, liable in a case that accused Ms. Adaya of violating a California civil rights law by attempting to evict a Jewish group in 2010, people on both sides of the dispute said on Wednesday.The case, which has been on trial in the Santa Monica division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court since late July, raised rare claims of anti-Semitism here.
In 2010, Ms. Adaya, who is a Pakistani-born Muslim, ordered the shutdown of a poolside event sponsored by the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, but eventually allowed the group to stay after insisting that signs and literature identifying its purpose be removed. In testimony by a former employee and others, she was said to have couched the order with an obscenity aimed at the Jews who had assembled for the event, and to have said her family members would cut off financing if they learned of the gathering.
In her testimony, Ms. Adaya denied those claims.
After deliberating for a week, jurors on late Wednesday found Ms. Adaya and a company that owns the hotel liable for the civil rights violation and for inflicting emotional distress and other violations. They awarded over $1.2 million to a group of plaintiffs that included 18 individuals and Platinum Events, a company that had worked with the hotel in setting up the event, said James Turken, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.


























In her testimony, Ms. Adaya denied those claims [and denying the testimony of other witnesses who did not have a financial stake in denying the plaintiffs' claims].
*****
Since lying is an inherent part of Islam, Adaya's testimony should count for shiitte. Whenever a Muslim is cross-examined the concept of Taqiyya should be introduced during the process of impeaching the witness. For any lawyer NOT to do that is an indication of malpractice. Believe me, there are sets of questions that can be asked of the Muslim who is bound and determined to lie. He/she will give so many conflicting accounts of the requirements of Islam that no one will believe the witness.