For how much can you now buy Iran's nuclear warhead?

To any readers who may be interested enough to care. The recent internet newsletter that I recived from
"actforamerica.com founded by Brigitte Gabriel gave the information that by October the Islamic "republic" will have made much progess in their schemes in going nuclear.

On this web site, before the obama/Mccain election, I tried to warn people that Obama had attended many palestinian rallies in the United States. Many who post here knew that. Many of the brain dead, post JFK democrats either didn't know or didn't care. I always thought obama's attendance at these rallies was significant, in a very bad way, for Israel and the United States. His attendance at these rallies was pretty much ignored by the MSM.

Since that time I have become convinced that obama is a muslim at heart. I have stated he is, in effect, a muslim "Manchurian Candidate". Those who remember that great movie realize there is one flaw in this comparison. In the movie, a communist is elected president. But he is an American, portrayed by Laurence Harvey, who has been brainwashed to be communist.

obama is doing all this with his eyes wide open.

The people who vote for him, for whatever reason, are voting for him with eyes wide open.

obama is not going to stop Iran from getting the nuclear bobmb.

... so who are targets #1 and #2 of the long list of infidel countries that Iran would like to destroy? ... Israel and the United States.

I believe Bibi is going to strike sometime in the next few months, because of the imminent nuclear threat of Iran.

This will undoubtedly spark another major middle east war.

Remember many years ago when Israel blew up the Iraqui nuclear project? Remember, more recently a similar strike in Syria by the Israelis?

Funny how history repeats itself, and those who don't learn the lessons of mistakes made in the past, are doomed to repeat them.

Wait a second..
Iran is selling electricity?
sending it to iraq, turkey and syria?

I thought they were short on electricity
and thats why they needed the NUKES.. err plants..

So now all of a suddend (cough cough) what a surprise
they have a huge surplus of electic power
and their selling it to 3 countries..

Is it just me or do i think like everyone else
that iran LIED to the UN, the USAS, clinton and the muslim in chief obama just to garner enough time to miniturize the nukes to make them small enough to put them on the tip
of their rockets which can now almost reach all of europe?

Hmmm the countdown has already begun
it started in 1992 with clinton - went through bush
and is now ticking so loud all the muslim world is drooling in anticipation of a crap load of nukes being cranked out and sold like candy to any muslim with the money to buy one..

Oh yea and the taliban and their plan hiroshima for the simultaneous destruction of 48 us cities have the money
From all the DRUGS they sold to all the liberal pot heads and crack addicts in the usa..

So when you see the flash, and your skin burns at 10000 C
just remember..
You paid for it with your drugs
You enabled it with your liberal policies
You wanted it to counter the usa and israels power..
Now you got it..

Flash bang
Your all dead..
Enjoy...

5:33 The punishment in this world for unbelievers (who make "mischief" i.e. 7:103 "reject Allah's signs", e.g. Christians & Jews who refuse to pay jizyah 9:29) is: "crucifixion ... cutting off hands and feet"

5:34 "Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."

(video) 12th Imam: Who is Mahdi? - Let's listen to Ahmadinejad

http://schnellmann.org/who-is-mahdi.html

"With each passing day Iran and the Islamic world come closer to developing nuclear weapons."

Pakistan already has them.
And word is that Saudi Arabia has purchased some from Pakistan for its own use.

One hopes that the U.S. and allies have strongly penetrated Iran with technological and human intelligence about Iranian activities toward development of a bomb. One hopes that through methods like Stuxnet and assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, the U.S. and allies, working behind the scenes, can indefinitely foil Iran's attempts.

But whatever clandestine control the U.S. and Israel may have in Iran must be tenuous and uncertain at best.
If we had secure control of the situation, why would Israeli leaders and society be so heavily debating an attack on Iran? That public debate has emerged strongly in Israel of late.

According to some news stories, most of the security officials in Israel think an overt Israeli attack on Iran is a bad idea, and only the political leaders B. Netanyahu and Ehud Barak are promoting attack. If that's the case, it suggests that the U.S. and Israel do have things under some significant degree of control by means of our spies and technology inside Iran, and that Western interests are best served for now by continuing along those lines. Perhaps Netanyahu, against Israel's security officials, finds that tenuous security through espionage insufficient and wants to more overtly destroy Iranian efforts, though that might only set the Iranians back a few years in developing nukes, while provoking worldwide mobilization and organization efforts by the Umma, energizing them, destabilizing the international order, and risking the outbreak of wars whose outcomes are impossible to predict. But Netanyahu may be relying on projections that predict relatively little international downside to an Israeli attack.

If overt war against Iran can be avoided, and if they can be dominated by clandestine methods -- Stuxnet, spies, sabotage, and the like -- avoiding overt war would surely be preferable, since quiet methods provoke far less mobilization/organization by the enemy. But it's difficult for outsiders not privy to U.S. intelligence and U.S. efforts in Iran to know what's really going on. Are the Obama administration and the U.S. military really reconciled to Iran getting the Bomb? Or do they have things under control by means of espionage and sabotage behind the scenes?

Or is there a third possibility: we don't have things that well under control clandestinely, but an overt attack is pointless anyway, because accelerating worldwide advances in technology are soon going to make it impossible to stop WMD creation and proliferation by militarily attacking a finite number of government facilities. I don't even want to spell out specifically the developments I'm referring to, though it's not that hard to find out about them. If that near term future scenario is correct, then an overt attack on Iran might be counterproductive. Quiet, and very numerous behind the scenes attacks would be most effective -- a vast clandestine sieve or net, rather than a fruitless attempt at total obliteration leading to huge and unmanageable costs.

To clarify the somewhat confusing language in my above comment, I should have written:

...an overt attack is pointless anyway, because the accelerating worldwide advances in technology are soon going to make destroying a finite number of enemy government facilities a completely inadequate way to stop WMD proliferation and creation.

As the great Pat Condell said-

"....for the first time since the middle ages, faith and politics go together like sex and violence, only this time space age weapons are controlled by stone age minds, and right now, especially in the Middle East, things are shaping up quite nicely to blow us all to kingdom come"

God bless you Pat.

Re: "With each passing day Iran and the Islamic world come closer to developing nuclear weapons."

There are already Islamic nuclear weapons. They are in Pakistan.