Fort Hood jihad mass murderer's Muslim beard still causing case delay

HasanBeard.jpg


"Hasan has grown a beard in violation of Army regulations, saying it's an expression of his Muslim faith." So what? His jihad murders were also an expression of his Muslim faith. He has violated army regulations, but what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces fails to understand is that he is not in the army at all, in any real sense. He is a jihadi, a soldier of Allah, by his own account (as I explained here). Shave him, try him, execute him.

"Fort Hood suspect's beard still causing case delay," from the Associated Press, August 22 (thanks to Kenneth):

FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) -- The government has a Wednesday deadline to tell an appeals court why an Army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage should be clean-shaven during his murder trial.

Last week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces delayed Maj. Nidal Hasan's court-martial while it considers his objection to being forcibly shaved.

Hasan has grown a beard in violation of Army regulations, saying it's an expression of his Muslim faith. The judge, Col. Gregory Gross, has banned Hasan from courtroom hearings but said he will be forcibly shaved before the trial if he does not shave the beard himself.

Hasan faces the death penalty if convicted of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the attack on the Texas Army post.

| 69 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

69 Comments

| Leave a comment

Beard or no beard - try him, convict him, punish him. Let the matter be closed!

Too bad for the judge. He's in one of those situations where a decision, a meaningful decision, must be made. Every pol, every public officer, each one having sworn the Article VI oath to "this Constitution" dreads the approach of such a day. It means they must, they have ta, they gotta make a decision.

"Am I gonna put my foot down, or am I gonna wimp out?"

"Do I possess courage, or am I just another Profile in Putty?"

"Do the rules, enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 14, really mean something or not?"

High noon draws nigh for Col. Gross.

Not in a joking way this really is splitting hairs. Matters not a jot whether he is cleanshaven or not. Just charge him also with violation of army regulations but get on with the main case. I'm with softlybob on this one. Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obeyance of fools.

He should have been shot down that dreadful day. He's already had a few years life he was not entitled to. Shaved or not, quickly convict the bastard then execute him at sundown.

I find it disturbing that Muslims tend to get away with pissing anyone off from top to bottom including Judges throughout the country. If it was me or someone who is not standing up for Islam, this case would been closed way back. I think the person who committed such a crime in the US military would been long incinerated and spat on for thousand years. This f...ing waste-bag has so much backing, including from our President, it is just a waste of tax $ by the mother lode. I am getting very tired of politicians pondering to the scum-bags to fill their vote banks. Let us use every resource we have to make sure Obama is never elected again.

Protests by Muslim activists in 5,4,3,2,1...

If he gets shaved, they'll be vowing to avenge the dead severed facial hairs

Just try the f... and get it over.
M

I don't believe the real issue here is whether this miserable piece of human waste will indeed agree to shave his beard as much as the strong and tragic indication of the American Judicial system's utter failure at being able to carry out it's primary mandate of justice. "With justice for all" has a rather hollow these days.

I am all for this mockery of our legal system to continue. That way few more clueless liberals may learn how these "soldiers of ALLAH" are ready to kill any and all of us infidels as dictated by their perfect man MOHAMMAD.

Well maybe not, the liberals will blame America and Israel for the reason of this poor HASAN's killing our own in our own backyard. OK, fry the SOB with or without the beard.

No doubt, the inmates are running the asylum.

Obviously also the typical journalist is 100% ignorant that the Greater Jihad is War for Islam,and not any Spiritual Struggle,just read:

"The Story that the Historical Muhammad talked of a Greater,Spiritual Jihad/Struggle and a Lesser,Military Jihad is False"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/05/21/the-story-that-the-historical-muhammad-talked-of-a-greaterspiritual-jihadstruggle-and-a-lessermilitary-jihad-is-false/

AND ALSO

"The False Conversion to Islam by Henryk Broder,the Most Famous Jewish Intellectual in Germany"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/08/08/the-false-conversion-to-islam-by-henryk-broderthe-most-famous-jewish-intellectual-in-germany/

The worms don't care if he has a beard or not. Justice must be done for the sake of society. Murder/treason in the time of war calls for the death penalty.

Well, you had to think that our wussified, PC/MC military would let this get out of control and become an islamic circus--and it's already happening--and the trial hasn't even STARTED yet! Thats OK--before he's done here Hasan will leave no doubt that his was an islamically-motivated "Man-Caused-Disaster..." Or was it "Workplace Violence?"

Well, out of deference to the 'religion of peace' I suppose the firing squad could be told to aim an inch or so above the beard, so as not to muss it up!

Honestly, the things we do for that 'religion'! :))

Secretly put pork in his food.

The bullets pass through a beard just fine.

We've shown that in Iraq and Afghanistan...

However, the blood of the dead cries from the ground and it's time to get this trial underway and then ended. Justice delayed is justice denied for those families of the dead at Ft. Hood.

Side Bet: I will bet you that if he'd been turned over to Texas jurisprudence that he'd be moldering in the grave by now.

I can understand you, but this is a matter of principle. As a member of the army he's got to abide by army rules. You've got to show the world how to enforce your rules.

As for tanstaafl's idea to secretly put pork in his food, you've got to tell him later, that's more fun. I know what I'm talking about, as a Jew I don't eat pork myself.

I'm so sick of seeing that punk's face.

Go ahead - break the rules of the Army. Make an exception in this case, then try and execute his sorry ass - not at sundown - but at sunup, so the foul Mohammedist can see the sun rise for all of us, and "set" 12 hours too early for his miserable self.

This man was and is a traitor and a murderer.

Leave the beard, if we must, but make him pay with his life, beard and all!

Can we bury him with a dead pig?

It should be repeated that the reason the this villain will not shave of his Islamic beard is because he is a murderous Muslim who has engaged at Fort Hood in the heinous and brutal actions of Islam's militant jihadism. His religion drove him to it. He was and is a Muslim who is a jihadist.
Therefore ,he is guilty of murder and likewise his religion,Islam, is also guilty of Murder.

This has more to do with defiance and contempt than anything else. Hasan was clean shaven before he murdered his fellow soldiers. His mind set then, was to kill for the sake of Allah and Islam. His mind set now, is to be contemptuously defiant for the same reasons.

Unlike these demonically possessed murderers for Allah and Islam, we as a civilised society, will never debase ourselves by having someone force shaved. However, this needs to be said by the court and Hasan demeaned for it, before he's allowed to enter the court room with his unshaven face.

he is just getting unnessaecery publicity. his beard is testiment to him being a jihadists. perhaps our people will wake up sooner than later by seeing it. as for you being a jew and not eating pork, i thought most of the jews who visit this site are submarines jews, meaning they surface twice a year, on passover and Yum Kipur!!! like my girl friend does!!!!!!! let me just tell you something my friend: try pork! bacon for sure!!! then you will know what it means to go to haven!!!!!!
M

This Fort Hood shooter yelled out "Allahu Akbar" all the while his was commiting these viscious and muredrous acts of jihadism. Then to top this all off some PC people try to call what happen just an act of "work place violence." Lets get with reality by is own words he exposed himself to be a believer in Islam and thus was engaging in the cruel, brutal acts of Islam's militant jihadism. Thus all these PC people need to wake up to how things really are and speak the truth. if they can.

Just an act of workplace violence was it? Then why grow the beard? All good Muslim men have beards!

Typical brain dead muslim ploy!

Obviously this asshole is going to the "Rip Van Winkle" defense. Stall, stall, stall, until your captors forget why they captured you, or just give up trying to bring you to justice. Not unlike the way the Iranians are going about building their nuclear bomb.

The Devotions sang about this defense:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fjfV8LjBuM

They made a movie about this defense:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVIE8UteHb0&feature=relmfu

So, I guess Nidal Hasan's next step is to fake a 20 year coma, and hope everything blows over.

The jury's still out (pun intended) on whether enemy terrorists who do not abide by Geneva Convention rules should be, by those same rules to which the USA subscribes, afforded a trial before execution after they have killed our citizens and/or our military personnel. I have yet to see evidence that a trial is required for such.

Part of the definition of a non-Geneva-compliant combatant is that they don't wear uniforms. Even if Hasan had been wearing the American uniform we stupidly issued him, that would not qualify as complying with Geneva, since he would arguably have been wearing that uniform to deceive in order to destroy, not to uphold, what the uniform stands for. As it is, however, on the day of his putting jihad into full-blooded practice, he donned Islamic garb; which, perhaps, should be deemed an enemy uniform, but which nevertheless is not -- and thus should contribute to his non-Geneva-compliant definition, under which, again, I have yet to see evidence of a requirement for a trial prior to execution.

P.S.: I recall that the Muslim-American (apologies for that indigestible hyphenation) Sergeant who killed fellow American soldiers in Iraq a few years ago was executed swiftly by the Bush Administration. I don't recall any trial, much less an O.J.ishly protracted one.

If you mean Hasan Akbar aka Mark Kools, he's not dead. He's living on the taxpayers' dime and waiting for what I believe is his last appeal.

If he loses this last one then he'll be executed.

He's another numbnut who converted, albeit at a young age due to his whore of a mother marrying a muslim supremacist, and magically became brother to all of the lunatics in the tribe of islam. Never mind he was born and raised as one of the tribe of America. mo's mad cult magically makes one a member of the knuckle dragging tribe of troglodytes eschewing one's own actual tribe, often violently, in the process.

I am so sick of islam, muslims, and their lap dogs on the left.

The beard is a distraction. Well for that matter, when considering human existence in all its dimensions, so is Islam except in a much bigger way. But I digress.

LJP, just put him in chains... firing squad... and facial hair will not matter! l am sure a hundred years ago.. a bringing up a coward like this monster a beard would not matter!

Agreed - lets get on with this already. Its salt in the wounds of the families of people he killed to avoid bringing this creep to justice because the army can't find a barber.

If he won't follow regulations, which didn't bother him before he decided to commit mass murder, then don't let him wear his uniform either. He should go to court just as he appears in his photo, orange jump suit and all. It is ridiculous that he is getting away with this. The more guilty he looks the better.

He should be force shaved with an old dull, rusty bait knife...Is it possible to have zero sympathy for this guy? Yuuup, it certainly is...

The only relationship this guy has with the U.S. Army is that he is a declared enemy.

...and while they're at it they should shave that revolting chest hair, ew!

When the democratic niceties are over and Nidal Hasan is finally tried and convicted, if he is executed Muslims the world over will regard that as an act of genocide against Islam.

Actually just half his moustache, beard and chest hair should be shaven - verticallly. Then he will receive just half of his unjust reward in the Islamic hellhole - or only half of the 72 virgins and little boys...from the waist up!

BTW His protestations about keeping his beard are nonsense.
Did he not expect to be killed when murdering those fourteen souls in his close-shaven state?

Surely the judge should deny his hirsute plea on those grounds alone?


Shave him, then shoot him.

OMG, get rid of him already, then drench his carcass in pig fat.

That's one way to deny him his 72 goats in hell.

He's still in the army, collecting his paycheck, so let him follow the dress code. He'll have plenty of time after his court marshall to grow another beard. His concern was dying without a beard, so he said.

I noted before this has entered the bureaucratic 'too hard' basket (1.Prisoner must be shaved, 2.Prisoner refuses, 3.can't use force,... so stalemate) and that the only 'out' is to command the judge to acquiesce or be replaced.

That prediction is still looking good.

Sorry folks,

Despite Hasan's own, delusional belief, he's not, as one poster suggests, an "enemy terrorist".

He is--I hate this part, an "alleged" murderer who remains (per the rules) a U.S. Army Major until the appropriate time.

The rules, disgusting as this situation seems, is still the rules.

If he had jumped up and down screaming at the top of his lungs that he is a jihadi "on a mission from God", he would not have simply been politely sent home as a civilian.

The rules, the regulations, and the procedures is the rules, the regulations, and the procedures.

"Our" rules, "our" laws, do not consider "jihad" to be a crime. Those specific acts committed by Muslims while carrying out their idiotic jihads are what "our" laws deal with.

Let's us forever keep it that way.

Looks like this story was posted Wednesday morning. Why have no further stories been posted today? Where is Spencer?

Traeh,

I was wondering the same thing...

G

Istanbul Chick, you may be right.

That Muslim Sergeant did his violent jihad against American soldiers in 2003 (throwing a grenade in a tent killing two, then picking up a gun to try to kill more).

In 2007, I had read stories like the following:

By Steve Esack Of The Morning Call
January 29, 2007

Sgt. Hasan Akbar was sentenced to death Thursday night for killing Army Airborne Capt. Christopher Scott Seifert and another officer during a grenade and rifle attack in Kuwait two years ago.

"Sgt. Hasan K. Akbar, it is my duty as the president judge of the military panel of this court-martial to inform you...it is the unanimous decision of us all that you should be put to death," the jury foreman said.

...

"We are satisfied with the verdict and believe that the panel has sent forth the appropriate sentence," Seifert's widow, Terri Seifert, said later. The decision means Akbar, a Muslim, has become the first U.S. soldier since the early Vietnam era to receive death for murdering a comrade during wartime.

...

It took seven hours for the jury to decide unanimously that Akbar deserved the ultimate punishment for killing Seifert, 27, and Stone, 40, of Boise, Idaho.

However, later in the story, it does go on to report:

The verdict, however, does not mean Akbar -- who prosecutors said attacked his comrades to prevent them from going to war against Muslims -- has an inevitable date with a lethal needle. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, death sentences undergo a five- step review, which can take years to complete.

So if Akbar is still un-executed, that would mean justice has not been served for nearly 10 years -- at this point 5 years after a jury sentenced him to death!

I still need to see evidence that such a delay of justice is required for enemy terrorists (which is what Akbar and Hasan should be defined as, irregardless of the fact they are not currently).

The demurrer of JW reader "PRCS" above, that Muslim murderers like Akbar and Hasan are not currently defined as enemy terrorists, only reflects our current PC MC disposition. The USA and any Western country could easily -- without breaking or bending any existing laws -- consider a Muslim who murders us (or plans to murder us) in the name of jihad to be ipso facto always an enemy terrorist -- regardless of whether he's a "citizen" or even a member of our military or intelligence. The fact that no Western country does this doesn't mean there is some magical wall preventing them from doing so. They should do it. They could do it. They will eventually do it -- the only question is not if, but when. Will the West wake up and readjust its definition of Muslim killers before the latter mass-murder hundreds of thousands of us in various places? Or after...?

American Muslim criminals should never, ever, ever be redefined as enemy terrorists; for to do so plays right into their hands, giving them the notoriety they crave and into the hands of those of their fellow American Muslim slaves who want us to believe that the strict compliance with the shari'ah that actually does apply to every Muslim is not their Islam; that it's the Islam of "fanatics".

No special treatment or definitions for Muslims who commit crimes here.

Just the law, as it applies to you and me. And them.

Hasan is still in the Army because that's the law.

Hold him accountable for his criminal acts, convict him, sentence him, and carry out his sentence.

And, above all, let his excuses and assertions about jihad help the American people understand just what Islam really teaches and how out of place it is here.

"Hasan has grown a beard in violation of Army regulations, saying it's an expression of his Muslim faith." So what? His jihad murders were also an expression of his Muslim faith."

Excellent, Robert.

PRCS,

If violent jihad were merely a "crime", I'd agree with you. But it's an ideology motivating plans to use WMDs against civilian populations in places, and at times, we will not always be able to predict.

This isn't about treating Muslims with more, or less respect, or about not giving them the notoriety they seek.

This is about saving thousands of lives. That requires that we treat them worse than criminals. That's how you treat fanatical megalomaniacs plotting to mass-murder random populations with WMDs. You don't treat them like a criminal with legal rights.

You figure out ways to stop them from killing us.

For fuck sake.

Good idea, I think you should shoot him with bullets laced with lard.

You might also feed his corpse to the pigs, but I'm afraid that would upset the poor creatures' stomach

Every time the court-martial is delayed, it's a victory for Jihad.
Get on with it!

Indian Rebellion of 1857 was caused by pork fat in the cartridges. The (muslim)soldiers had to bite the end of the cartridge to release the powder. Cow fat was also used...which offended the Hindus. Seems you can't win!

"His concern was dying without a beard, so he said."
I don't think he had a beard when he went on his murder spree... He expected to die then.

My approach to this:

Give Hasan 10 minutes to shave and declare, "Either shave now or we wheel you out to the firing squad at the 11th minute. Your body will be tossed into a hog pen."

Isn't this a military trial?

Letting Hasan get away with this power play serves to embolden like-minded Muslims!

The answer is simple and quick: Shave him, try him, execute him, and the sooner the better.

If you google JAG Operational Law Handbook, you will find the instructions/rules for cases such as this. More interesting, the Office of Military Commissions has a page with open cases to view. I wasn't really amazed at all the Arabic/Muslamic names of defendants. This is the place of places to research just how far down the road we've gone with military justice. Can't blame it all on the Eddie Slovik case of 1944 or the Lt. Callie case of 1971.

Really, Hesperado.

As the bright, articulate, and impressive writer that you are, that last sentence is truly beneath you.

Violent jihad--as a component of the Islamic ideology--IS a crime, here. How it’s handled in Muslim countries is irrelevant to us.

While I fully agree that Islam's overt violence is part of THEIR ideology, I can think of no reason that our legal system should reflect that. Such acts are already covered by established codes and punishments.

Today’s JW article on Ramzi Yousef is a reminder of that; as with the chargings, trials, and sentencings of the “shoe bomber”, the “underwear bomber”, Carlos Bledsoe, Sergeant Akbar, and numerous other “jihadists”—all of whom made their stupid religious reasons known—to the American public—before being sentenced to long, long terms in Kuffar prisons.

Unfortunately, we are generally unable to foresee or prevent acts of violence in our open society—jihad or otherwise; as several recent mass murders attest. Though few of us, I’m sure, want a Romanian style police state, I personally support the kind of aggressive police work needed to bring potential jihadists to our man-made legal system.

But, even if clueless military “leaders” had done their duty during his many years in the Army, they could not have foreseen that Hasan would actually act out violent jihad—if they even knew what that is.

And, of course, Hasan is on trial for murder. Not for jihad.

How would YOU prevent the introduction and use of WMD here?

"Violent jihad--as a component of the Islamic ideology--IS a crime, here."

Did I say it wasn't?

PRCS,

I'm not going to repeat myself. All your straw men and questions are answered by me already. Life's too short to repeat arguments for dense people.

PRCS,

As for your final question, if you can't think of an answer, and if your inability in this regard reflects most Westerners, then we're fucking doomed.

Your arguments make no sense.

As you freely admit, violent jihad, here, is a crime. Even planning it is a crime.

End of subject.

"That requires that we treat them worse than criminals. That's how you treat fanatical megalomaniacs plotting to mass-murder random populations with WMDs."

No, you put them in prison and continue police/intelligence actions to prevent such actions to the extent humanly possible.

Even you know that a dedicated jihadist--maybe living amonst us at this very moment--WILL be able to circimvent even the most thourough attempts to prevent him/her from carrying out the plot.

I asked what YOU would do, but you know there's nothing you can do that would be 100% effective.

Dense?

Adios, idiot.

LemonLime, I've left a comment at your blog, under your August 21 post.

Cut his Dam beard and get over it! Who in Hell is the Boss? The Killer or the Judge! Hey! this is America, What's Up!!!!! What about the Victims???
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Strap his arms, put his head in a gripping device (the rest of him is already suitably restrained because of his paralysis) and shave him.

The judge has already threatened that he (the judge) will do it himself; so let him (that is, the judge) carry out that threat. With a rusty razor, pig-fat soap, and an expression of infinite contempt.

Film the ceremonial shaving and (once the trial is over, and the mass-murderer executed) put the video clip up somewhere, with a 'pay per view' button, for the enjoyment of the Infidel public; I reckon you'd just about recoup the cost of the trial, and then some. I suspect any number of infidels - and not just in the USA, think of the Indian market! - would be willing to shell out fifty cents to a dollar to see an American military judge ruthlessly removing the face fungus from this vile creep, prior to subjecting him to the full force of the Law.

One of President Romney's "things to do": As CIC, tell the Military that "PC" is over and adherence to the UCMJ is in. There is no way this Court Martial should take more than two weeks. The Appeals are mandated by the UCMJ, so it will take some time to execute sentence.

All of those suggestions about disposing is his body reminds me of how the Black Hole of Calcutta started. The first lots of new ammunition used Tallow to keep the powder dry, so the Hindus complained. Then, they switched to Lard and that made the Muslims unhappy. At that point, both groups identified the Brits as the Problem and went about solving it...

So, where will I be able to buy the view? Web or DirecTV?

PRCS adverts to his rhetorical question:

I asked what YOU would do, but you know there's nothing you can do that would be 100% effective.

There must be a name for the second logical fallacy PRCS is indulging in here (aside from the straw man); for the failure to come up with an elemnetary management of a problem is not justified because any given management of the problem is (or might be) "not 100% effectve".

If Western civilization in all its myriad obligations from the technological to the sociopolitical refrained from doing anything that was "not 100% effective" we'd never get anything done.

Surely, PRCS didn't intend to go down that road. Though I wouldn't put anything, no matter how dense, past him.

Nor would I put any idea, no matter how idiotic, or illegal, past you.

"That requires that we treat them worse than criminals."

Really.

In your world, Hesperado, what does that entail and when would your fantastic soulutions be enacted?

When a jihadist is thinking about jihad?

When a jihadist is plotting jihad?

Before the jihadist carries out the jihad?

After the jihadist carries out the jihad?

At what point in that process has a jihadist become "more than a criminal" in our legal system?

And would your "solutions" include every Muslim in America, Hesperado?

Of course, if life's too short to bother answering, why do you keep doing so?

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter