Afghan soldier turns his gun on his American “allies,” murdering two

Barack Obama and General John Allen should be prosecuted for the deaths of every one of the fifty troops murdered by their Afghan “allies” this year. They are all victims of the politically correct unwillingness to accept unpleasant realities about Islam: that it teaches hatred of and warfare against unbelievers, the virtue of deceit in war, and the impermissibility of cooperating with or allying with infidels on a permanent and lasting basis. “Afghan inside attack kills 2 Americans, 2 Afghans, marking 2,000 US troop deaths,” from the Associated Press, September 30 (thanks to Kenneth):

An Afghan soldier turned his gun on American troops at a checkpoint in the country’s east, killing two Americans and at least two fellow members of Afghanistan’s army in a shooting that marked both the continuance of a disturbing trend of insider attacks and the 2,000th U.S. troop death in the long-running war, officials said Sunday.

The string of insider attacks is one of the greatest threats to NATO’s mission in the country, endangering a partnership key to training up Afghan security forces and withdrawing international troops.

Saturday’s shooting took place at an Afghan army checkpoint just outside a joint U.S.-Afghan base in Wardak province, said Shahidullah Shahid, a provincial government spokesman.

“Initial reports indicate that a misunderstanding happened between Afghan army soldiers and American soldiers,” Shahid said. He said investigators had been sent to the site to try to figure out what happened….

Afghan soldiers and policemen — or militants in their uniforms — have gunned down more than 50 foreign troops so far this year, eroding the trust between coalition forces and their Afghan partners. An equal number of Afghan policemen and soldiers also died in these attacks, giving them reason as well to be suspicious of possible infiltrators within their ranks.

The attacks are taking a toll on the partnership between international and Afghan forces, prompting the U.S. military to restrict operations with small-sized Afghan units earlier this month.

The military didn’t restrict them enough.

The close contact — with coalition forces working side by side with Afghan troops as advisers, mentors and trainers — is a key part of the U.S. strategy for preparing the Afghans to take the lead in security operations as the U.S. and other nations prepare to pull out their last combat troops at the end of 2014, just 27 months away….

And obviously it’s working very, very well.

Newsday: Pro-freedom ads should come down because they might anger jihadis
Sacramento: Popular radio hosts absent from show after calling for "anti-Muhammad ads"
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    Barack Obama and General John Allen should be prosecuted for the deaths of every one of the fifty troops murdered by their Afghan “allies” this year.

    Absolutely. Can you imagine what would be happening in the private sector if something like this was going on? There would be valid lawsuits galore over what these imbeciles and/or traitors are responsible for.

  2. says

    “Barack Obama and General John Allen should be prosecuted for the deaths of every one of the fifty troops murdered by their Afghan “allies” this year. ”

    Indeed. And their families should sue them in civil court for millions.

  3. says

    Well, congratulations to him and a successful military operation. If the USA, which is the country that invaded and occupied two countries and in the process killed, maimed, raped, and tortured millions, had succeeded in placing agents who joined the Taliban/Al Qaeda and then took a few out the USA would be celebrating it as a major success. Well, armed resistance to invasion and occupation is, according to the UN, both morally and legally justified. Once again congratulations on eliminating terrorist that murder, rape, and torture civilians and pretty much everyday humiliate innocent Afgans/Iraqis. Just because the mainstream news does not show it, does not mean that it does not happen.

  4. says

    Gen Allen will be on 60 Minutes tonight. If he starts with the warrior man cry, I’m going to throw up.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen him interviewed, so this should be good.

  5. says

    Our military force is also politized to our detriment. Before we can have some hope to save our freedom we need to say goodbye to OBAMA and all these current generals of the military should be retired. Obama is waiting just before elections to bring troops from Afganistan to score political points. What a traitor of our poor soldiers in Afganistan waiting to be slaughtered by his “allies”. How come we have no protests against thst on our streets? Well it is because of our ENEMEDIA. Covering up for Obama. Committing suicide at the same time. What a shame!!!!

  6. says

    I guess the group hugs aren’t working out. I think they’d prefer a circle jerk or something. Read Sennels articles:

    Nicolai Sennels 2010 articles “Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society” and ” The connection between Muslim inbreeding and terrorism.” here’s a quote: Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1,400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool.”

    I attached to these articles a copy of a poster of a bunch of raving, ranting Muslims beside a picture of a stout fellow wearing glasses standing in a laboratory with the caption: “In 2007 Islam and Judaism’s holiest holidays overlapped for 10 days. Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies in 94 terror attacks across 10 countries during this time…while Jews worked on their 159th Nobel Prize.”

  7. says

    Just because the mainstream news does not show it, does not mean that it does not happen.

    Just because the mainstream media doesn’t show your prophet Muhammad was a pig it does not mean that he wasn’t one.

  8. says

    Another day, another clown! You wrote: ‘Well, armed resistance to invasion and occupation is, according to the UN, both morally and legally justified.’

    NATO is in Afghanistan with the official approval of the government. For what it’s worth, Pakistan is a NATO ally. So, ‘invasion’ it is not! NATO is there to help these governments fight Islam, represented by the Taliban and a host of other psychos that want to establish Sharia.

    The raping, maiming and torture is all being done by Islam’s slaves. Building hospitals, schools and digging wells is NATO’s contribution. The Taliban blow them up and throw acid in girls’ faces.

    You’re a red-nosed, baggy-trousered, wire-wigged clown!

  9. says

    Just because the mainstream news does not show it, does not mean that it does not happen.

    Just because a low-life dirty liar says it does happen it, most certainly, doesn’t.

    May you choke on your hate, scum.

  10. says

    Nope the clown is actually YOU. NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. UN is the United Nations! NATO is a military alliance comprising of North Atlantic countries, whereas UN is an organisation that incorporates world nations without any military commitments. So I think you will find that the clown is actually YOU!

    Process: Invasion, occupation and then the installment of a faux democratic parliament. As we have seen, when given genuine democracy the people from Muslim countries tend to vote for Islamic leaning parties.