Indonesian President at UN calls for legally binding Sharia blasphemy law criminalizing criticism of Islam

Religion in a product of man's imagination. Why protect a pure fantasy from criticism?

This is where science is superior. Science is open to changes. Of all religion, mohammedism is the most reluctant to change and they are going berserk now because they are losing the survival of the fittest. Cultures evOlve and cultures that do not adapt to necessary changes die out.

"Ban blasphemy against religious symbols"---

Ok, then... but we would have to build prisons that can hold up more than 1 billion people. Muslims are the most intolerant, bigoted and blasphemous against non-muslim "religious symbols" and even between each other-sufi vs shia vs ahmadiyya vs sunni vs alawite... etc.-. Here's some of that hatred and blasphemous behavior:

memritv.org

Besides thief, buffoon.

'Must'?

I say "No!".

Against "religious symbols"?

Was Mohammad a "symbol" or an historical person?

Who defines "blasphemy"? Zealots?

Imams are heavily rewarded each time his members threaten the American embassy. A pacifier soon arrives in the form of a suitcase full of hundred dollar bills. But in reality Muslims care little about Muhammad’s reputation, they only care about the free goat meat and camels milk they get from the rewarded Imam.

The President said that the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights underlined that all people must observe morality and public order in exercising their freedom of expression.

Who is the UN to tell me what I must and must not do? They have no mandate over individuals surely, governments may choose to be bound by them but I do not.

Sooner or later, and hopefully sooner, the West and Muslims will have to make up their minds if we can live together in the West. At this moment in time, it does not appear that we can. Certainly in Muslim nations, I see no future for Christians.

They are concerned, and see a major block, of global scope, to their successful takeover. Freedom of Speech, is the primary firewall, in their way, they know it. That is their wedge issue, along with their insiders, chief of which is hussein. Tens of millions of armed militia, in America, is another block in their way, and there is more. Will not mention. They will find out to their surprize.

What does dialogue between different faiths mean? Jews can talk to Hindus, Christians to Buddhists? That's fine, no problem at all. But dialogue with Mohammedans means, they demand that barbaric sharia is imposed globally. At the moment it's especially about their stupid idea of blasphemy. But it won't stop at that. They'll carry on until there will be only two groups on this planet: Mahoundians and dhimmis. This has to be nipped in the bud.

UN i.e. Mafia organization

http://schnellmann.org/islamophobia.html

(video) Islamophobia vs. Q.5:38 "(thieves) cut off his or her hands" … also from kids for stealing a 50 cent candy bar in the supermarket

“Freedom of expression is therefore not absolute,” Yudhoyono said in an address that principally focused on global security....

Either one is free, or not!

Your wife is also a little bit preganant
(not "whole" pregnant), Mr. dhimmi Q.9:29 Yudhoyono

http://www.schnellmann.org/counterjihad.html

These paintings were done by "celebrated" (and now dead) Indian artist M.F. Hussain:

http://users1.jabry.com/pg211/site/coll/pras/hussain/hussain.htm

Hindus didn't go around killing people or burning mosques. There were some protests of course but the Indian Government and MSM branded them as Hindu fanatics. They said this is freedom of expression.

These paintings were done by "celebrated" (and now dead) Indian artist M.F. Hussain:

http://users1.jabry.com/pg211/site/coll/pras/hussain/hussain.htm

Hindus didn't go around killing people or burning mosques. There were some protests of course but the Indian Government and MSM branded them as Hindu fanatics. They said this is freedom of expression.

QUOTE
"In other words, pass international Sharia blasphemy laws, and the riots will stop. But the implication is that if we maintain free speech, more "armed conflicts" will erupt."

Ah, yes...Extortion & Rackateering, one of the Fave Combos of SO many other criminal organizationss, and let's not kid ourselves folks, that's all islam is, a big criminal organiztion-cult attempting to masquerade as a religion.

In order to give Islam credibility, you must first believe that an incoherent angel named Gabriel whispered all that dark and evil...stuff...into the ear of a psychotic Arab...
Not only that, but the psychotic Arab remembered it word for word, even the long drawn out...stuff...Idiot savant maybe?
Or completely fabricated story?
Since I don't believe in incoherent angels, I lean toward fabrication...Most likely Robert is right...Mahound did not really exist...He has been fabricated...

Check out this strange situation:

"About Saparmurat Niyazov(1940-2006),the Turkmen and Muslim President who wrote a Book that he said was the Equal of the Koran"

http://www.antisharia.com/2012/09/27/about-saparmurat-niyazov1940-2006the-turkmen-and-muslim-president-who-wrote-a-book-that-he-said-was-the-equal-of-the-koran/

AND ALSO

"Article and Video about the Barbary Wars when the US smashed the Muslim Pirates of the Mediterranean"

http://www.antisharia.com/2012/06/03/article-and-video-about-the-barbary-wars-when-the-us-smashed-the-muslim-pirates-of-the-mediterranean/

Its ridiculous statement came from someone like him. Where is he and what he did when churches persecuted and burned in Indonesia? as president he did NOTHING. Many churches destroyed because some fanatic muslim don't like it there, and police do nothing, just watching as it legal by law to expel christian from their church (actually its not legal in Indonesian law) and he did NOTHING. Even the persecuted christian asked him to help them, but he gave no response. I think persecution is more than blasphemy. BUT when there's film about islam, he talking to the world. President, Indonesia is not a muslim country, so you MUST (not should) treat other religion as the same as muslim. And the more important, its better to solve your own country problem first, not just about religion only, but also corruption that spreading like cancer in your goverment.

A definitive plan to halt Sharia Law must be devised and coordinated on a global basis. Please visit our website:
www.thefinalcrusade.org

If God exists, can He not speak?
re: "Religion". Because there exists bad religion does not mean all religion is bad.
Thus, apply that idea to anything else...bad music exists therefore all music is bad?
Should one rule out the possibility of God revealing Himself? "God spoke to Moses". Exodus 33:11
I do not believe God or an Angel spoke to Muhammad. That does not mean that God has never spoken to anyone.

From the article -" to ban blasphemy against religious symbols and to promote dialogue between different faiths, civilizations and cultures."

Translation: "to ban all criticism and questioning of Islam, and to promote Muslim da'wa toward non-Muslims".

Whenever one hears Muslims talk about 'dialogue' and 'interfaith', think: 'da'wa'.

"to prevent incitements to violence based on religion"

Translation: to prevent Islamosavvy persons from using words and/ or actions to defend themselves against Jihad or encouraging other non-Muslims to defend themselves against Jihad" The Muslim attitude is that resisting jihad is a crime. If you are attacked by Muslims, you must silently submit. The Muslims of Gaza feel entitled to attack Israel; they also view it as a terrible evil if Israel hits back. The Pact of Omar, the legendary template of all the 'rules for dhimmis', makes that quite clear: no dhimmi is allowed to possess or bear arms, and no dhimmi is allowed to strike a Muslim...ever, under any circumstances whatsoever. Self-defence is **not permitted**. Islam is the epitome of non-reciprocity: Muslims are allowed to hit non-Muslims, and non-Muslims (so Muslims firmly believe) are nasty wicked creatures if they *dare* to hit back. Muslims are the savages described in G K Chesterton's essay on 'the barbarism of Berlin': "he laughs when he hurts you, and howls when you hurt him".

More: "a dialogue was needed to build cooperation globally".

Translation: Everybody must listen to Muslim da'wa, so as to be 'groomed' for conversion or dhimmi submission.

I am assuming that in this variety of Islamspeak, 'dialogue' = da'wa and 'cooperation' = acceding to Muslim demands and commands.

"These communities will become bulwarks for peace and they will make it difficult, if not impossible, for any kind of armed conflict to erupt"

Translation: once there are enough brainwashed dhimmis, resistance to Jihad will become difficult, even impossible for the others who *don't* want to submit.

More:
"all people must observe morality and public order in exercising their freedom of expression."

Translation: "all people must submit to the sharia definition of 'morality' and 'public order' when writing, speaking, or producing any kind of artwork."

In the Islamic worldview, whatever sharia permits (including polygyny, keeping of multiple concubines, 'temporary' 'marriage', Muslim seizure and rape of wives and daughters of non-Muslim men, slavery, and sex with and beating of your prepubescent nine year old 'wife') is 'moral' and whatever sharia forbids is 'immoral' (like pet dogs, church-bells, pictures and statues of living beings, drinking wine, and unrelated men and women sharing a work-place); and 'public order' = Muslims rule, dhimmis submit and pay jizya, and anyone who doesn't want to be a Muslim or a dhimmi gets killed.