Libyan official says protests were planned, not spontaneous, and had nothing to do with movie

Susan Rice v. Mohammed el-Megarif:

Given that some of Megarif's colleagues in the revolt against Qaddafi were known Qaida followers and sympathizers, he'd probably be in a position to get at least some useful intelligence.

Susan Rice's view that the riots were spontaneous reactions to a video by obscure persons,and the Obama administration's initial, strident condemnations of the film, suggest that Susan Rice was saying lines given her by an administration that may very well harbor ambitions to severely curtail First Amendment freedoms.

We need to have more videos - well made ones. All the brouhaha seems to build up audience interest and points to a new and lucrative genre. Maybe Disney could be enticed.

As Chico Marx, now parading around in the person of Susan Rice (career hack), once said, "Who are ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?"

Let's see, who has more credibilty; the Obama Administration...or the Libyans? Perhaps the question should be put another way: Who has LESS credibility? Unfortunately, it's a tough call...

Oh good, now Obama isn't even waiting for the Muslims to destroy our embassies, now he's destroying them himself.
Diplomats at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut have started to destroy classified material

If he'd treat our embassies like the sovereign soil of the United States (which they are) instead of like sitting ducks in a shooting gallery, we'd be better off.
Col. Hunt: Libya Embassy Guards had No Bullets - The State Department just allowed our guys to get killed

Who's side is Obama on anyway?

From the photos I saw of the Libyan consulate, your average 7-Eleven has more security than our consulate in Libya, is that how you defend the lives of Americans in a war zone?

Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif told NPR, “The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous.” It was, he claimed, a military-style attack. This matches claims that there was no obvious protest presence before the strikes on the Benghazi consulate and that grenades were used. It remains to be seen if al-Qaeda was involved, but it has urged a campaign of terror against US representatives.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100181345/what-the-obama-administration-did-wrong-in-the-middle-east/

This administration is the worst ever America has elected. Apologizing to muslims at the expense of our freedom. Even the muslims are contradicting Obama. How bad can it get guys? OBAMA = Enemy mumber one of USA

Quick video clip from Fox News:

Obama answers to the Qur'an first and the constitution second

Australia;

Girl of 8 calls for jihad and global caliphate...

http://www.news.com.au/national/video-of-8-year-old-jihad-girl-urging-islamic-uprising/story-fndo4bst-1226476305453

Hey Hey !!! Talking about film making, why not let us Brits get in on the act. How about 'Muhammad and Gromit' ... well Muhammad liked dogs didn't he ?

While it is manifestly true that Obama is fostering tension between his administration and Israel, the other two charges seem empty. I presume you must have the early warning radar in Czech lands and the anti-missiles on the Polish soil in mind. There is no betrayal there, I am sure. To the contrary, Obama had respected the Czech public opinion, which was rather strongly against any foreign bases. Chalk one up for him..
Although Obama does hurt North American national interests by his pro Sharia policies, the notion that he is the worst American president in modern times is debatable. After all, he had nothing to do with setting the disastrous course the USA sails in foreign policy ever since the fall of communism in the USSR.
Who was it that betrayed the Russian people by claiming victory over them? They had thought that they themselves were the winners; they lost a powerful enemy and gained a great ally in addition to freedom, and democracy. Next they knew, however, they were and still are being put down as losers! This point was driven especially deep into the Russian psyche, when USA and NATO attacked the Serbian people multiple times in recent history, helping their enemies steal territory from them, while the media regularly made reference to the fact that Russia was Serbia's traditional best ally and friend! "Look, Ma, I'm beating the Russian bear's little brother, and he's too pussy-like to do anything about it!."
It also was not Obama, who envisioned Ukraine and Georgia in NATO, nor did he betray the nations of Abkhazia and Ossetia by denying them rights to nationhood and sovereignty. This last one is especially egregious transgression against the very principles the Free West claims to uphold.
For those a little weak on the historical context here, Abkhazia had been a sovereign state already some three-thousand years ago. It went into the Russian Empire as a sovereign state just like Georgia, since both had asked for annexation so as not to be left hanging low on the branch for the Turks to pluck; therefore, one might expect that both should have the right to regaining sovereignty upon the falling apart of the empire, or of its heir - the USSR. But meanwhile, someone had waved a magic-wand and made Abkhazia and South Ossetia into parts of Georgia. Who was the culprit, you ask? A Georgian, of course!
Why is NATO/USA carrying out Stalin's will? If elected, will Romney continue this foolishness? Interestingly, the answer is already a firm Yes! Romney had unequivocally stated that that Russia will retain her designation as a Number One geopolitical foe! This is presented as not a declaration of enmity, but just a natural fact common in relationships between big countries. You know, you are not my bitter foe, but just a geopolitical one..
The assertion that Russia is America's greatest enemy {and vice-versa} just because of geopolitics is seriously vulnerable: The notion lacks tradition. For instance, if America had seemed destined to be Russia's enemy to the Russian tzar, he would not sell it Alaska, would he? Let's not even get into how important the two countries were to each other as allies during WWII, rather let's look into the present day American interests regarding Russia. Firstly, is it the very country that bothers American politicians? Would they like to see the planet Earth diminished by one-sixth of its dry land by having Russia go Poof? Would the world be that much better off? The answer is No, obviously, since Russia is a sparsely populated country, which is no ecological burden on the world, but rather a great plus for it due to its natural resources, the vast forests producing oxygen, etc. Therefore, it is not the land but the Russian people whose existence feels like a burden (to the American politicians}. Let's consider this idea as reasonable for a moment - then the question is, who would we like to see peopling Russia instead. With Germanics out of contention since WWII, there are only three theoretically possible candidates for substituting Russians: muslims, Indians, and Chinese.
Treating Russia as #1 geopolitical foe may very well lead, directly or indirectly, to one or all of these candidates' over-running of Russia. The mechanism of this changing of possession is very simple, we already see it in progress - in order to sustain its economical capability to compete in armaments with her self-professed Number One geopolitical enemy, the USA, Russia is allowing in ever greater numbers of foreigners. Muslims are taking over Moscow, Chinese labourers and businessmen are flooding into Siberia. Soon, in fifty years or so, we should see Romney's dream come true - the Russian Islamic Federation. I suppose that the rationale is that it will be the only way to keep peace in Europe, for it is a given that otherwise a powerful Christian Russia would be too great a provocation to the Great Islamic Britain, Islamic France, Spain, Denmark, Austria, Germany, etc. Of course, Islamic Russia might not like the heathen USA much, but that's nothing a little Jizzya could not take care of.
One thing is for sure, the Arabs, Pakis, Indonesians and other muslims have been beside themselves these past seventy years from laughing at how both the heathen West and East compete for their favors. Divide et regnum..
I know this will sound outrageous to you, but I believe that America should think of Russia as a big Israel, whose existence is beneficial to the Free World, and act adequately before it's too late.
So, who is better, Obama or Romney? Wrong question - it should be Who is Worse?